Askew, S. (2000). Feedback for learning. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213–238.Google Scholar

Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Bennett, N., Desforges, C., Cockburn, A., & Wilkinson, B. (1984). The quality of pupil learning experiences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25.Google Scholar

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.Google Scholar

Colvin, G. (2008). Talent is overrated: What really separates world-class performers from everybody else. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some issues. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and science, sports, and games (pp. 14–64). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hargreaves, E., McCallum, B., & Gipps, C. (2000). Teacher feedback strategies in primary classrooms: New evidence. In Askow, S. (Ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 34–43). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (1999, August). Influences on student learning. Inaugural lecture, professor of education, University of Auckland. Retrieved from www.arts.auckland.ac.nz/staff/index.cfm?P=5049.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. A. C., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.Google Scholar

Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In Lester, J. F. K. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Kennewell, S. (2001). Using affordance and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2), 101–116.Google Scholar

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.Google Scholar

Kroog, H., King Hess, K., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2016). Implement effective and efficient approaches to formal formative assessment that will save time and boost student learning. Educational Leadership, 73(7), 22–25.Google Scholar

Li, M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Thummaphan, P. (2014, April). Students’ use of written feedback in science notebooks. Paper presented at the AERA annual meeting, Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Marshall, B., Carmichael, P., & Drummond, M.-J. (2007). Learning how to learn in classrooms. In James, M., McCormick, R., Black, P., Carmichael, P., Drummond, M.-J., Fox, A., MacBeath, J., Marshall, B., Pedder, D., Procter, R., Swaffield, S., Swann, J., & Wiliam, D. (Eds.), Improving learning how to learn: Classrooms, schools, and network (pp. 56–71). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2012). Learning targets: Helping students aim for understanding in today’s lesson. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar

Nebelsick-Gullett, L., Hamen Farrar, C., Huff, K., & Packman, S. (2013). Design of interim assessment for instructional purpose: A case study using evidence centered design in advanced placement. In Lissitz, R. W. (Ed.), Informing the practice of teaching using formative and interim assessments (pp. 21–48). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning process: Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 5(1), 85–102.Google Scholar

Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2010). Developing and Evaluating Measures of Formative Assessment Practice (DEMFAP) theoretical and methodological approach. Manuscript, Laboratory of Educational Assessment, Research, and Innovation (LEARN), University of Colorado Denver.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers’ practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(3–4), 205–235.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Furtak, E., Ayala, C., Yin, Y., & Shavelson, R. J. (2010). Formative assessment, motivation, and science learning. In Cizek, G. J. & Andrade, H. (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 139–158). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Iverson, H., & Sands, D. (2013). Video logging approach. Document for Second Advisory Board Meeting, Laboratory of Educational Assessment, Research, and Innovation, University of Colorado Denver.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2004). On the use of students’ science notebooks as an assessment tool. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30, 61–85.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2011, April). Looking into the teachers’ feedback practices: How teachers interpret students’ work. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2013a). Examining formative feedback in the classroom context: New research perspectives. In McMillan, J. H. (Ed.), Handbook on research on classroom assessment (pp. 215–232). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2013b). Analyzing teachers’ feedback practices in response to students’ work in science classrooms. Special Issue on Using Evidence to Take Action: Strategies Teachers Use to Deconstruct Student Work. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3), 163–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Kroog, H. (2016). The impact of observation sampling strategies on the accuracy of inferences about teacher’s formative assessment practices. Paper submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Kroog, H., & Sands, D. (2015, August). Teachers’ judgments on-the-fly: Teachers’ response patterns to students’ responses in the context of informal formative assessment. Paper presented at the Symposium “From Teachers’ Assessment Practices to Shared Professional Judgment Cultures” at the European Association for Research on Instruction and Learning, Limassol, Cyprus.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Sands, D. (2009). Developing and Evaluating Measures of Formative Assessment Practices (DEMFAP). Proposal submitted to the Institute of Education Sciences, Cognition and Student Learning. Award ID: R305A100571.Google Scholar

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Sands, D., & Kroog, H. (2016). Developing and Evaluating Measures of Formative Assessment Practices (DEMFAP): Technical report on instrument development and evaluation. Technical report submitted to the Institute of Education Sciences, Washington, DC, IES Grant R305A100571.Google Scholar

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.Google Scholar

Shavelson, R. J., Yin, Y., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Ayala, C. (2008). On the role and impact of formative assessment on science inquiry teaching and learning. In Coffey, J., Douglas, R., & Stearns, C. (Eds.), Assessing science learning: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 21–36). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.Google Scholar

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Syed, M. (2010). Bounce: Mozart, Federer, Picasso, Beckman, and the science of success. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 475–511.Google Scholar