Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Preface
- Organization of This Handbook
- How to Work with This Handbook
- Part I Background and Theory
- Part II Application Areas of Interaction Analysis
- Part III Methodology and Procedures of Interaction Analysis
- Part IV Data Analysis and Data Presentation
- Part V Coding Schemes for Interaction Research
- General Group Process Systems
- Argument, Conflict, and Negotiations
- Coordination and Coherence
- Cognition and Metacognition
- 33 CASoRL
- 34 Coding Scheme for Group Creativity
- 35 Analyzing Critical Thinking in Group Constellations
- 36 Identifying Teacher and Student Contributions during Assessment Conversations
- 37 Hidden Profile Discussion Coding
- 38 TRAWIS
- Personality and Team Behavior
- Roles and Relationships
- Appendix
- Index
- References
35 - Analyzing Critical Thinking in Group Constellations
From Discourse Analysis to Analyzing Social Modes of Thinking
from Cognition and Metacognition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Preface
- Organization of This Handbook
- How to Work with This Handbook
- Part I Background and Theory
- Part II Application Areas of Interaction Analysis
- Part III Methodology and Procedures of Interaction Analysis
- Part IV Data Analysis and Data Presentation
- Part V Coding Schemes for Interaction Research
- General Group Process Systems
- Argument, Conflict, and Negotiations
- Coordination and Coherence
- Cognition and Metacognition
- 33 CASoRL
- 34 Coding Scheme for Group Creativity
- 35 Analyzing Critical Thinking in Group Constellations
- 36 Identifying Teacher and Student Contributions during Assessment Conversations
- 37 Hidden Profile Discussion Coding
- 38 TRAWIS
- Personality and Team Behavior
- Roles and Relationships
- Appendix
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Group Interaction Analysis , pp. 547 - 555Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Apple, M. (Ed.). (2010). Global crisis, social justice, and education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685–730. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956 ). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company.Google Scholar
Bloom, M., & Watt, D. (2003). Solving Canada’s innovation conundrum: How public education can help. Ottawa, ON: Conference Board of Canada.Google Scholar
Bolhuis, S. (2003). Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: A multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 13(3), 327–347. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00008-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correnti, R., & Rowan, B. (2007). Opening up the black box: Literacy instruction in schools participating in three comprehensive school reform programs. American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 298–339, doi:10.3102/0002831207302501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the class-room. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ennis, R. H. (1962). A concept of critical thinking: A proposed basis for research in the teaching and evaluation of critical thinking ability. Harvard Educational Review, 32(1), 81–111.Google Scholar
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research findings and recommendations. Newark, DE: American Philosophical Association.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: The Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Galotti, K. M., Clinchy, B. M., Ainsworth, K. H., Lavin, B., & Mansfield, A. F. (1999). A new way of assessing ways of knowing: The Attitudes Toward Thinking and Learning Survey (ATTLS). Sex Roles, 40(9), 745–766. doi:10.1023/A:1018860702422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giroux, H. (2015). Education and the crisis of public values: Challenging the assault on teachers, students, and public education. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Halpern, D. F. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 69–74. doi:10.1002/tl.8005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henri, F. (1991) Computer conferencing and content analysis. In O’Malley, C. (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 117–136). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Kaye, A. R. (Series Ed.), NATO ASI Series: Vol. F 90. Collaborative learning through computer conferencing (pp. 117–136). Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
hooks, b. (2010). Teaching critical thinking: Practice wisdom. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jeong, A. C. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1701_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Ladson-Billings, G. J., & Tate, W. (2006). Education research in the public interest: Social justice, action, and policy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
McLaren, P. (2016). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Newman, D. R., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 3(2), 56–77.Google Scholar
Nystrand, M., Wu, L. L., Gamoran, A., Zeiser, S., & Long, D. (2003). Questions in time: Investigating the structure and dynamics of unfolding classroom discourse. Discourse Processes, 35(2), 135–198. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3502_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, R. W., & Binker, A. J. A. (1990). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA 94928.Google Scholar
Postman, N., & Weigartner, C. (1969). Teaching as a subversive activity. New York, NY: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Introduction. In Baron, B. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
Thayer-Bacon, B. (2000). Transforming critical thinking: Thinking constructively. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (1980). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal. San Antonio, TX: PsychCor.Google Scholar
Wegerif, R., Fujita, T., Doney, J., Linares, J. P., Richards, A., & Van Rhyn, C. (2017). Developing and trialing a measure of group thinking. Learning and Instruction, 48, 40-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohar, A., Weinberger, Y., & Tamir, P. (1994). The effect of the biology critical thinking project on the development of critical thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 183–196. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by