Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:02:53.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - On Attachment and Evolution: Recounting the Story of, and Stories in, Attachment Theory

from Part III - Postcopulatory Adaptations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2022

Todd K. Shackelford
Affiliation:
Oakland University, Michigan
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, we provide a review of human attachment and bonding, from the perspective of attachment theory and with an eye towards evolutionary psychology and narrative methodologies. Attachment theory, a dominant paradigm in contemporary psychological science, is used to understand the processes by which people form, and the implications of, adaptive and maladaptive attachments across the lifespan. Distinct from its predecessors, including object relations theory and social learning theories of dependence, attachment theory is a curious combination of psychoanalytical, ethological, and evolutionary principles. Attachment theory was born out of an interest in understanding why infants desire a close physical proximity to their caregivers. This phenomenon is explained by the existence of an innate attachment behavioral system, a system that has evolved to aid the likelihood of survival throughout infancy and childhood and, later, reproduction. At the heart of the attachment behavioral system lies the internal working model of close relationships, believed to be largely formed on the basis of experiences in infancy and, to a lesser degree, beyond. Caregivers who are available and appropriately responsive are thought to contribute to the development of a secure attachment model, one in which the individual is comfortable depending on caregivers, and later being depended upon. When caregivers are less reliable, the attachment behavioral system may become upregulated, leading to an anxious orientation, defined by hypersensitivity to others’ availability and a preoccupation with potential loss and separation, or downregulated, leading to an avoidant orientation, defined by a desire for separation and independence. The attachment construct, which has been assessed using behavioral, projective, interview, and self-report methodologies, carries implications for functioning from the infant to the elderly, as well as the varied relationships that are entertained between these periods. In adulthood, romantic attachment may be plotted along continuous dimensions of anxiety and avoidance. These constructs are most often considered via self-report measures in which participants rate their affect, behaviors, and cognitions within romantic relationships. Incorporating evolutionary principles and life history theory, some have predicted, and some have found, sex differences in levels of insecure romantic attachment, with males demonstrating comparably heightened levels of avoidance and females demonstrating comparably heightened levels of anxiety. Here, we further exemplify this finding via the life stories of a small number of male and female cases with varying levels of avoidance and anxiety. As a species, we have evolved to possess both (i) a complex attachment behavioral system designed to help us thrive in the social world, and (ii) a tendency to perceive the social world, ourselves, and our relationships as a story. We conclude by signaling the need for further work exploring attachment, evolution, and lived experience.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, J. M., Dunlop, W. L., Fivush, R., Lilgendahl, J. P., Lodi-Smith, J., McAdams, D. … & Syed, M. (2017). Research methods for studying narrative identity: A primer. Social and Personality Psychological Science, 8, 519527. doi: 10.1177/1948550617698202Google Scholar
Adler, J. M., Lodi-Smith, J., Philippe, F. L., & Houle, I. (2016). The incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting well-being: A review of the field and recommendations for the future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 142175. doi: 10.1177/1088868315585068Google Scholar
Adler, J. M., Turner, A. F., Brookshier, K. M., Monahan, C., Walder- Biesanz, I., Harmeling, L. H., … & Oltmanns, T. F. (2015). Variation in narrative identity is associated with trajectories of mental health over several years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 476496. doi: 10.1037/a0038601Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1967). Infancy in Uganda: Infant care and the growth of love. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1969). Object relations, dependency and attachment: A theoretical review of the infant-mother relationship. Child Development, 40, 9691025. doi: 10.2307/1127008Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1974). Citation for the G. Stanley Hall Award to John Bowlby. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1990). Epilogue. In Greenberg, M. T., Ciccheti, D., & Cummings, E. M. (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years (pp. 463488). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1969). Some contemporary patterns of mother-infant interaction in the feeding situation. In Ambrose, A. (Ed.), Stimulation in early infancy (pp. 133170). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41, 4967. doi: 10.2307/1127388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bell, S. M., & Stayton, D. J. (1971). Individual differences in strange-situation behaviour of one-year-olds. In Shaffer, H. R. (Ed.), The origins of human social relations (pp. 1757). London & New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E. & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 46, 333341. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.4.333Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Wittig, B. A. (1969). Attachment and exploratory behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. In Foss, B. M. (Ed.), Determinants of infant behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 111136). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2009). The first 10,000 Adult Attachment Interviews: Distributions of adult attachment representations in clinical and non-clinical groups. Attachment & Human Development, 11, 223263. doi: 10.1080/14616730902814762Google Scholar
Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 147178. doi: 10.1177/0265407590072001Google Scholar
Bartholomew, K. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226244. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.2.226CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motive. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497529. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497Google Scholar
Beckes, L., & Simpson, J. A. (2009). Attachment, reproduction, and life history trade-offs: A broader view of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 2324. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, K. Y., Hesse, E., & Main, M. (2007). Mothers’ attachment status as determined by the Adult Attachment Interview predicts their 6-year-olds’ reunion responses: A study conducted in Japan. Developmental Psychology, 43, 15531567. doi: 0.1037/0012–1649.43.6.1553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beller, E. K. (1955). Dependency and independence in young children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 87, 2535. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1955.10532913Google Scholar
Beller, E. K. (1959). Exploratory studies of dependency. Transactions of New York Academy of Sciences, 21, 414426. doi: 10.1111/j.2164Google Scholar
Belsky, J. (2002). Why the “transmission gap” in attachment research: Differential susceptibility to rearing influence? Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 2, 163183. doi: 10.1080/15289168.2002.10486426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647670. doi: 10.2307/1131166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosmans, G., & Kerns, K. A. (2015). Attachment in middle childhood: Progress and prospects. In Bosmans, G. & Kerns, K. A. (Eds.), Attachment in middle childhood: Theoretical advances and new directions in an emerging field. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 148, 114. doi: 10.1002/cad.20100Google Scholar
Borelli, J. L., David, D. H., Rifkin-Graboi, A., Sbarra, D. A., Mehl, M. R., & Mayes, L. C. (2013). Language use in the Adult Attachment Interview: Evidence for attachment-specific emotion regulation. Personal Relationships, 20, 2337. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01394.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borelli, J. L., Sbarra, D. A., Mehl, M., & David, D. H. (2011). Experiential connectedness in children’s attachment interviews: An examination of natural word use. Personal Relationships, 18, 341351. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01294.xGoogle Scholar
Borelli, J. L., Somers, J., West, J. L., Coffey, J. K., De Los Reyes, A., & Shmueli-Goetz, Y. (2015). Associations between attachment narratives and self-report measures of attachment in middle childhood: Extending evidence for the validity of the Child Attachment Interview. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 12351246. doi: 10.1007/s10826-015-0310-8Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1953). Critical phases in the development of social responses in man and other animals. New Biology, 14, 2532.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In Simpson, J. A. & Rholes, W. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 4676). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology, 28, 759775. doi: 10.1037/0012–1649.28.5.759Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54, 1132.Google Scholar
Bühler, J., & Dunlop, W. L. (2019). The narrative identity approach and romantic relationships. Social and Personality Psychological Compass, e12447. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12447Google Scholar
Campbell, L., & Marshall, T. (2011). Anxious attachment and relationship processes: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Personality, 79, 12191249. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00723.xGoogle Scholar
Campos, J. J., Barrett, K. C., Lamb, M. E., Goldsmith, H. H., & Stenberg, C. (1983). Socioemotional development. In Haith, M. M. & Campos, J. J. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Infancy and psychobiology (pp. 783915). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Chen, B-B., & Li, D. (2009). Avoidant strategy in insecure females. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 2627. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000016Google Scholar
Davila, J., & Sargent, E. (2003). The meaning of life (events) predicts change in attachment security. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 13831395. doi: 10.1177/0146167203256374Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 121. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09000016Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M. (2011). Sex differences in romantic attachment: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 193214. doi: 10.1177/0146167210392789Google Scholar
Del Giudice, M., & Belsky, J. (2010). Sex differences in attachment emerge in middle childhood: An evolutionary hypothesis. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 97105. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00125.xGoogle Scholar
Dollard, J., & Miller, N. E. (1950). Personality and psychotherapy. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2010). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types: Issues and controversies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 10701083. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.xGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, W. L. (2015). Contextualized personality, beyond traits. European Journal of Personality, 29, 310325. doi: 10.1002/per.1995Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L. (2019). Love as story, love as storytelling. Personal Relationships, 26, 114136. doi: 10.1111/pere.12271Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Bühler, J., Maghsoodi, A., Harake, N., Wilkinson, D., & McAdams, D. P. (2020). The stories couples live by. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. doi: 10.1177/0265407520969900Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Hanley, G. E., & McCoy, T. P. (2019). The narrative psychology of love lives. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 761784. doi: 10.1177/0265407517744385Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Harake, N., Gray, J., Hanley, G. E., & McCoy, T. P. (2018). The rises and falls of romance: Considering redemption, contamination, and affective tone in the narrative construction of love lives. Journal of Research in Personality, 74, 2329. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.01.003Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., Karan, A., Harake, N., & Wilkinson, D. W. (2020). Love in the first degree: Individual differences in first-person pronoun use and adult romantic attachment styles. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11, 254265. doi: 10.1177/1948550619847455Google Scholar
Dunlop, W. L., & Tracy, J. L. (2013). Sobering stories: Narratives of self-redemption predict behavioral change and improved health among recovering alcoholics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 576590. doi: 10.1037/a0031185Google Scholar
Ein-Dor, T., Mikulincer, M., Doron, G., & Shaver, P. R. (2010). The attachment paradox: How can so many of us (the insecure ones) have no adaptive advantage? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 123141. doi: 10.1177/1745691610362349Google Scholar
Figueredo, A. J., Vásquez, G., Brumbach, B. H., Schneider, S. M. R., Sefcek, J. A., Tal, I. R., … & Jacobs, W. J. (2006). Consilience and Life History Theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26, 243275. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2006.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraley, R. C. (2002). Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: Meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 123151. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_03Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C. (2019). Attachment in adulthood: Recent developments, emerging debates, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 401422. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102813Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., Brumbaugh, C. C., & Marks, M. J. (2005). The evolution and function of adult attachment: A comparative phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 731746. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.751Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132154. doi:10.1O37//1089-2680.4.2.132Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., & Spieker, S. J. (2003). Are infant attachment patterns continuously or categorically distributed? A taxometric analysis of strange situation behavior. Developmental Psychology, 39, 387404. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.39.3.387Google Scholar
Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350365. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350Google Scholar
Freeman, H., & Brown, B. B. (2001). Primary attachment to parents and peers during adolescence: Differences by attachment style. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 653674. doi: 0047-2891/01/1200-0653$19.50/0Google Scholar
Freud, A. (1946). The psychoanalytic study of infantile feeding disturbances. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 2, 119132. doi: 10.1080/00797308.1946.11823541Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1938). An outline of psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1996). Adult Attachment Interview protocol. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Granqvist, P. (2020). Attachment, culture, and gene-culture co-evolution: Expanding the evolutionary toolbox of attachment theory. Attachment & Human Development. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2019.1709086Google Scholar
Gray, J., & Dunlop, W. L. (2019). Structure and measurement invariance of adult romantic attachment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101, 171180. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1391274Google Scholar
Hammack, P. L. (2008). Narrative and the cultural psychology of identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 222247. doi: 10.1177/1088868308316892Google Scholar
Harake, N., & Dunlop, W. L. (2020). Storying the heartbreak: The transformational processing of romantic breakups. Narrative Inquiry, 30, 1840. doi: 10.1075/ni.18064.harGoogle Scholar
Harlow, H. F. (1959). Love in infant monkeys. Scientific American, 200, 6886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartup, W. W. (1963). Dependency and independence. In Stevenson, H. W. (Ed.), Child psychology: The sixty-second yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 333363). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511524. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511Google Scholar
Hesse, E. (2008). The Adult Attachment Interview: Protocol, method of analysis, and empirical studies. In Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 552598). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Klein, M. (1932). The psychoanalysis of children (The International Psycho-analytical Library, No. 22).Google Scholar
Klein, M. (1952). Some theoretical conclusions regarding the emotional life of the infant. In Klein, M., Heimann, P., Isaacs, S., & Riviere, J. (Eds.), Developments in psychoanalysis (pp. 198236). London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Leary, M. R., & Buttermore, N. R. (2003). The evolution of the human self: Tracing the natural history of self-awareness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33, 365404. doi:10.1046/j.1468-5914.2003.00223.xGoogle Scholar
Lilgendahl, J. P., & McLean, K. C. (2019). Narrative identity processes and patterns of adjustment across the transition to college: A developmentally contextualized approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000277Google Scholar
Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1998). Adult attachment scoring and classification system, Version 6.0. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Main, M., Goldwyn, R., & Hesse, E. (2003). Adult attachment scoring and classification system, Version 7.2. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50, 66104. doi: 10.2307/3333827Google Scholar
Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1990). Procedures for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In Greenberg, M. T., Cicchetti, D., & Cummings, M. E. (Eds.), Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention (pp. 121160). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63, 365396. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00500.xGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (2008). The life story interview. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 272295. doi: 10.1177/1745691612464657Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P. (2019). First we invented stories, then they changed us: The evolution of narrative identity. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 3, 118. doi: 10.26613/esic.3.1.110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new big five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204217. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204Google Scholar
McAdams, D. P., Reynolds, J., Lewis, M., Patten, A., & Bowman, P. J. (2001). When bad things turn good and good things turn bad: Sequences of redemption and contamination in life narrative, and their relation to psychosocial adaptation in midlife adults and in students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 472483. doi: 10.1177/0146167201274008Google Scholar
McCoy, T. P., & Dunlop, W. L. (2016). Contextualizing narrative identity: A consideration of assessment settings. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 1621. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2016.08.006Google Scholar
McLean, K. C., & Syed, M. (2015). Personal, master, and alternative narratives: An integrative framework for understanding identity development in context. Human Development, 58, 318349. doi: 10.1159/000445817Google Scholar
McLean, K. C., Syed, M., Pasupathi, M., Adler, J. M., Dunlop, W. L., Drustrup, D., … & McCoy, T. P. (2020). The empirical structure of narrative identity: The initial big three. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, 920944. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000247Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., Birnbaum, G., Woddis, D., & Nachmias, O. (2000). Stress and accessibility of proximity-related thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual components of attachment theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 509523. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.509Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53152). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Pianka, E. R. (1970). On r- and K-selection. The American Naturalist, 104, 592596.Google Scholar
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Barrett, L. F. (2000). The internal working model concept: What do we really know about the self in relation to others? Review of General Psychology, 4, 155175. doi: 10.1037/1089–2680.4.2.155Google Scholar
Roisman, G. I., Holland, A., Fortuna, K., Fraley, R. C., Clausell, E., & Clarke, A. (2007). The Adult Attachment Interview and self- reports of attachment style: An empirical rapprochement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 678697. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.678Google Scholar
Sarbin, T. (Ed.). (1986). The narrative as a root metaphor for psychology. Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 321). New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Scharfe, E. (2017). Sex differences in attachment. In Shackelford, T. K. & Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 15). New York, NY: Springer International.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Is short-term mating the maladaptive result of insecure attachment? A test of competing evolutionary perspectives. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 31, 747768. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271843Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. (2008). Evolutionary perspectives on romantic attachment and culture: How ecological stressors influence dismissing orientations across genders and geographies. Cross-Cultural Research, 42, 230247. doi: 10.1177/1069397108317485Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, I. U., Austers, I., Bannett, K. L., … & Zapancic, A. (2003). Are men universally more dismissing than women? Gender differences in romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions. Personal Relationships, 10, 307331. doi: 10.1111/1475-6811.00052Google Scholar
Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment theory and research: Resurrection of the psychodynamic approach to personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 2245. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.002Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971980. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971Google Scholar
Simpson, J. A., & Belsky, J. (2008). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework. In Shaver, P. R. & Cassidy, J. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, 2nd ed. (pp. 131157). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Spitz, R. A. (1965). The first year of life. New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A. (2005). Attachment and development: A prospective, longitudinal study from birth to adulthood. Attachment & Human Development, 7, 349367. doi: 10.1080/14616730500365928CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sroufe, L. A., Carlson, E. A., Levy, A. K., & Egeland, B. (1999). Implications of attachment theory for developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 113. doi: 10.1017/s0954579499001923Google Scholar
Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., & Kreutzer, T. (1990). The fate of early experience following developmental change: Longitudinal approaches to individual adaptation in childhood. Child Development, 61, 13631373. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02867.xGoogle Scholar
Szepsenwol, O., & Simpson, J. A. (2019). Attachment within life history theory: An evolution perspective on individual differences in attachment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 6570. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.03.005Google Scholar
Target, M., Fonagy, P., Shmueli-Goetz, , Data, A., & Schneider, T. (2007). The Child Attachment Interview (CAI) protocol. London: University College LondonGoogle Scholar
van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (1996). Attachment representations in mothers, fathers, adolescents, and clinical groups: A meta- analytic search for normative data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 821. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.1.8Google Scholar
van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2019). Bridges across the intergenerational transmission of attachment gap. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 3136. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.014Google Scholar
Van Rosmalen, L., Van der Veer, R., & Van der Horst, F. C. P. (2015). Ainsworth’s Strange Situation procedure: The origin of an instrument. Journal of the Behavioral Sciences, 51, 261284. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.21729Google Scholar
Waters, E., Weinfield, N. S., & Hamilton, C. E. (2000). The stability of attachment security from infancy to adolescence and early adulthood: General discussion. Child Development, 71, 703706. doi: 0009-3920/2000/7103-0016Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. (2005). Foreword from the scientific side. In Gottschall, J. & Wilson, D. S. (Eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative (pp. viixi). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. (1963). The child, the family, and the outside world. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Winnicott, D. W. (1986). Home is where we start from: Essays in psycholanalysis. Compiled and edited by Winnicott, C., Shepherd, S., & Davis, M.. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×