Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:39:57.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Leading for Creativity

A Tripartite Model

from Collaborative Creativity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2019

By
Michael D. Mumford ,
Robert W. Martin ,
Samantha Elliott  and
Tristan McIntosh
Edited by
James C. Kaufman  and
Robert J. Sternberg
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Robert J. Sternberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Traditionally, leadership has not been viewed as critical to creativity and innovation. In real-world settings, however, the need for multiple people and multiple different groups, in turning creative ideas into viable products, places a premium on leadership. In fact, prior work indicates that leadership is a powerful influence on the success of creative efforts. In the present effort, a tripartite model of the key actions required of those asked to lead creative efforts is presented. This model holds that leaders must (1) plan and direct creative efforts, (2) sell, or champion, creative efforts, and (3) manage interactions among team members working on creative efforts. The implications of these observations for developing people to lead creative efforts are discussed.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity , pp. 546 - 566
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbey, A. & Dickson, J. (1983). R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 362–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinlade, D., Liden, R. C., & El Akremi, A. (2015). Power distance as a moderator between the effect of LMX & intellectual stimulation on creativity. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015(1), 1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allocca, M. A. & Kessler, E. H. (2006). Innovation speed in small and medium‐sized enterprises. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ancona, D., & Caldwell, D. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, H., Barker, P., & Chen, X. (2006). The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, F. M. & Farris, G. F. (1967). Supervisory practices and innovation in scientific teams. Personnel Psychology, 20, 497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atwater, L. & Carmeli, A. (2009). Leader–member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 264–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnowe, J. T. (1975). Leadership and performance outcomes in research organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14, 264–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, B. M. & Bass, R. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Besemer, S. P. & O’Quin, K. (1999). Confirming the three-factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, K. & Sherwin, M. J. (2005). American Prometheus: The triumph and tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Byrne, C. L., Shipman, A. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). The effects of forecasting on creative problem-solving: An experimental study. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinal, L. B. (2001). Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science, 12, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinal, L. B. & Hatfield, D. E. (2000). Internal knowledge generation: The research laboratory and innovative productivity in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinal, L. B., Miller, C. C., Kreutzer, M., & TenBrink, C. (2015). Strategic planning and firm performance: Towards a better understanding of a controversial relationship. In Mumford, M. D. & Frese, M. (eds.), The psychology of planning in organizations: Research and applications (pp. 260–288). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carmeli, A., Cohen-Meitar, R., & Elizur, D. (2007). The role of job challenge and organizational identification in enhancing creative behavior among employees in the workplace. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughron, J. J. & Mumford, M. D. (2008). Project planning: The effects of using formal planning techniques on creative problem‐solving. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17, 204–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Černe, M., Jaklič, M., & Škerlavaj, M. (2013). Authentic leadership, creativity, and innovation: A multilevel perspective. Leadership, 9, 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Tjosvold, D., & Liu, C. (2006). Cooperative goals, leader people and productivity values: Their contribution to top management teams in China. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1177–1200.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R. G. & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2000). New product performance: What distinguishes the star products. Australian Journal of Management, 25, 17–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curral, L. A., Forrester, R. H., Dawson, J. F., & West, M. A. (2001). It’s what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2006). Leadership in team-based organizations: On the threshold of a new era. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Dreu, C. K. W. & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191–1201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dougherty, D. & Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1120–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A. & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sense making perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 286–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenbeis, S. A. & Boerner, S. (2013). A double-edged sword: Transformational leadership and individual creativity. British Journal of Management, 24, 54–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, G. & Ryhammar, L. (1999). The creative climate: Its determinants and effects at a Swedish University. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frese, M., Mumford, M. D., & Gibson, C. (2015). Organizational planning. In Mumford, M. D. & Frese, M. (eds.), The psychology of planning in organizations: Research and applications (pp. 1–8). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedrich, T. L. & Mumford, M. D. (2009). The effects of conflicting information on creative thought: A source of performance improvements or decrements?. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertner, J. (2012). The idea factory: Bell Labs and the great age of American innovation. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. & Mumford, M. D. (2013). Evaluation, criticism, and creativity: Criticism content and effects on creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 314–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. J. (2016). The rise and fall of American growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, V. C., Schniederjans, M. J., & Cao, Q. (2015). Diffusion of innovation: Customer relationship management adoption in supply chain organizations. International Journal of Quality Innovation, 1, 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemlin, S. (2009). Creative knowledge environments: An interview study with group members and group leaders of university and industry R&D groups in biotechnology. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18, 278–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemlin, S. & Olsson, L. (2011). Creativity‐stimulating leadership: A critical incident study of leaders’ influence on creativity in research groups. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiltzik, M. (2016). Big science: Ernest Lawrence and the invention that launched the military industrial complex. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hounshell, D. A. (1992). Du Pont and the management of large-scale research and development. In Galison, P. & Hevly, B. W. (eds.), Big science: The growth of large-scale research (pp. 236–261). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, J. M. & Boies, K. (2004). Champions of technological innovation: The influence of contextual knowledge, role orientation, idea generation, and idea promotion on champion emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J. M. & Higgins, C. A. (1990). Champions of change: Identifying, understanding, and supporting champions of technological innovations. Organizational Dynamics, 19, 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, T .P. (1989). American genesis: A history of the American genius for invention. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Dimensions of creative climate. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 15, 97–116.Google Scholar
Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, R. (2015). Three scenarios for industrial relations in Europe. International Labour Review, 154, 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikeda, K. & Marshall, A. (2016). How successful organizations drive innovation. Strategy and Leadership, 44, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaksen, S. G. (2017). Leadership’s role in creative climate creation. In Mumford, M. D. & Hemlin, S. (eds.), Handbook of research on leadership and creativity (pp. 131–158). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
James, L. R., James, L. A., & Ashe, D. K. (1990). The meaning of organizations: The role of cognition and values. In Schneider, B. (ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 40–84). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelinek, M. & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). The innovation marathon: Lessons learned from high technology firms. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Joo, B. K. B., Song, J. H., Lim, D. H., & Yoon, S. W. (2012). Team creativity: The effects of perceived learning culture, developmental feedback and team cohesion. International Journal of Training and Development, 16, 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, T. A. & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jung, D. I. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, R. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 547–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, R. T. (2006). Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 202–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kickul, J. & Gundry, L. K. (2001). Breaking through boundaries for organizational innovation: New managerial roles and practices in e-commerce firms. Journal of Management, 27, 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidder, T. (1981). The sole of a new machine. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
Kim, K. Y., Eisenberger, R., & Baik, K. (2016). Perceived organizational support and affective organizational commitment: Moderating influence of perceived organizational competence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 558–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapierre, J. & Giroux, V. (2003). Creativity and work environment in a high-tech context. Creativity and Work Environment, 12, 11–23.Google Scholar
Lee, J. (2008). Effects of leadership and leader-member exchange on innovativeness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 670–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of idea appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Y., Cheng, W., Ribbens, B. A., & Zhou, J. (2013). Linking ethical leadership to employee creativity: Knowledge sharing and self-efficacy as mediators. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41, 1409–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, N. R. F. & Solem, A. R. (1962). Improving solutions by turning choice situations and problems. Personnel Psychology, 15, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainemelis, C., Kark, R., & Epitropaki, O. (2015). Creative leadership: A multi-context conceptualization. The Academy of Management Annals, 9, 393–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcy, R. T. & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Social innovation: Enhancing creative performance through causal analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcy, R. T. & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Leader cognition: Improving leader performance through causal analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, S. E. & Smith, J. W. (2017). How can we advise Achilles? A rehabilitation of the concept of the champion for leadership. In Mumford, M. D. & Hemlin, S. (eds.),Handbook of research on leadership and creativity (pp. 29–43). London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Markham, S. K. & Aiman-Smith, L. (2001). Product champions: Truths, myths and management. Research-Technology Management, 44, 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markham, S. K. & Griffin, A. (1998). The breakfast of champions: Associations between champions and product development, environments, practices, and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 436–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marta, S., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Leadership skills and group performance: Situational demands, behavioral requirements, and planning. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medeiros, K. E., Partlow, P. J., & Mumford, M. D. (2014). Not too much, not too little: The influence of constraints on creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A. D. & Goes, J. B. (1988). Organizational assimilation of innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 897–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D. (2006). Pathways to outstanding leadership: A comparative analysis of charismatic, ideological and pragmatic leaders. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Bedell-Avers, K. E., & Hunter, S. T. (2008). Planning for innovation: A multi-level perspective. In Mumford, M. D., Hunter, S. T., & Bedell-Avers, K. E. (eds.), Research in multi-level issues, Vol. 3. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., & Gaddis, B. (2003). How creative leaders think: Experimental findings and cases. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Feldman, J. M., Hein, M. B., & Nago, D. J. (2001). Tradeoffs between ideas and structure: Individual versus group performance in creative problem-solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Gibson, C., Giorgini, V., & Mecca, J. (2014). Leading for creativity: People, products, and systems. The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 757–782). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D. & Gustafson, S. B. (2007). Creative thought: Cognition and problem solving in a dynamic system. Creativity Research Handbook, 2, 33–77.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Higgs, C., Todd, E. M., & Martin, R. (in press). Leading creative groups: What must leaders think about? In Paulus, P. & Nijstad, B. (eds.), Group creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D. & Hunter, S. T. (2005). Innovation in organizations: A multi-level perspective on creativity. In Yammarino, F. J. & Dansereau, F. (eds.), Research in multi-level issues (Vol. 4, pp. 11–74). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Marks, M. A., Connelly, M. S., Zaccaro, S. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2000). Development of leadership skills: Experience and timing. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R., & Van Doorn, J. A. (2001). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology, 5, 213–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Todd, E. M., & Higgs, C. (in press). Leading for innovation: Exercising influence by setting and adapting constraints. Business Creativity and the Creative Economy.Google Scholar
Nijstad, B. A. & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nohria, K. & Gulati, S. (1996). Is slack good for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39, 799–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, G. C. (1998). Market learning and radical innovation: A cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulus, P. B. & Nijstad, B. A. (eds.). (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E. & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Borman, W. C., Jeanneret, P., & Fleishman, E. A. (1999). An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O* NET. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group and Organization Management, 40, 428–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qu, R., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. (2015). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of leader creativity expectations. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., & e Cunha, M. P. (2012). Authentic leadership promoting employees’ psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research, 65, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robledo, I. C., Peterson, D. R., & Mumford, M. D. (2012). Leadership of scientists and engineers: A three‐vector model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1995). Correlations between avocations, scientific style, work habits, and professional impact of scientists. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. (1991), The evaluative, valuative, and divergent thinking of children. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, S. J. & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, S. J. & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1709–1721.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipman, A. S., Byrne, C. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Leader vision formation and forecasting: The effects of forecasting extent, resources, and timeframe. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, P. D. (2008). Creativity from constraints: What can we learn from Motherwell? from Modrian? from Klee?. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, J. M. & Mumford, M. D. (2005). The origins of vision: Effects of reflection, models, and analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 121–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thamhain, H. J. (2003). Managing innovative R&D teams. R&D Management, 44, 297–322.Google Scholar
Thamhain, H. J. & Gemmill, G. R. (1974). Influence styles of project managers: Some project performance correlates. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, P. & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Knippenberg, D. (in press). Leadership and creativity in business. In Mumford, M. D. & Hemlin, S. (eds.), Handbook of research on leadership and creativity. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Vessey, W. B., Barrett, J. D., Mumford, M. D., Johnson, G., & Litwiller, B. (2014). Leadership of highly creative people in highly creative fields: A historiometric study of scientific leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 672–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2015). Toward an integrated theory of insight in problem solving. Thinking and Reasoning, 21, 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, G. (1992). Inventions and corporations in the maturing electrical industry. In Weber, R. J. & Perkins, D. N. (eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 291–310). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yukl, G. (2011). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Zaccaro, S. J., Connelly, S., Repchick, K. M., Daza, A. I., Young, M. C., Kilcullen, R. N., & Bartholomew, L. N. (2015). The influence of higher order cognitive capacities on leader organizational continuance and retention: The mediating role of developmental experiences. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 342–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×