Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity Across Domains
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity Across Domains
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Creativity and Domain
- Part II Creativity in the Traditional Arts
- Part III Creativity in the Sciences
- Part IV Creativity in Business
- Part V Newer Domains for Creativity Research
- Part VI Creativity in Everyday Life
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Part V - Newer Domains for Creativity Research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity Across Domains
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity Across Domains
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Creativity and Domain
- Part II Creativity in the Traditional Arts
- Part III Creativity in the Sciences
- Part IV Creativity in Business
- Part V Newer Domains for Creativity Research
- Part VI Creativity in Everyday Life
- Part VII Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Abstract
Legal research on creativity centers on intellectual property law, a field of law that regulates rights in creations of the mind. Recent studies in this area explore how creativity is evaluated for purposes of awarding intellectual property rights, how the prospect of legal rights affects creativity, whether creativity impacts the valuation of subject works, and how the public conceptualizes creativity in relation to intellectual property rights. This body of research speaks to creativity studies in many domains and to the ability of intellectual property law to function as designed.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains , pp. 445 - 522Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
35 U.S.C. §103 (2012).Google Scholar
American Intellectual Property Law Association (2015). Model Patent Jury Instructions. AIPLA.Google Scholar
Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27(3), 158–163.Google Scholar
Bechtold, S., Buccafusco, C., & Sprigman, C. J. (2016). Innovation heuristics: Experiments on sequential creativity in intellectual property. Indiana Law Review, 91, 1251–1307.Google Scholar
Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co., 188 U.S. 239 (1903).Google Scholar
Brest, P., & Kreiger, L. H. (1999). Lawyers as problem solvers. Temple Law Review, 72(4), 811–832.Google Scholar
Buccafusco, C., & Sprigman, C. J. (2009). The creativity effect. University of Chicago Law Review, 78(1), 31–52.Google Scholar
Buccafusco, C., Burns, Z. C., Fromer, J. C., & Sprigman, C. J. (2014). Experimental tests of intellectual property laws’ creativity thresholds. Texas Law Review, 92(7), 1921–1980.Google Scholar
Burk, D. L., & Lemley, M. A. (2003). Policy levers in patent law. Virginia Law Review, 89(7), 1575–2003.Google Scholar
Burk, D. L., & Lemley, M. A. (2009). The patent crisis and how the courts can solve it. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, M. (2009). One size does not fit all: A framework for tailoring intellectual property rights. Ohio State Law Journal, 70(6), 1361–1434.Google Scholar
Dastar Corporation v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, 539 U.S. 23 (2003).Google Scholar
Eisenberg, R. (1989). Patents and the progress of science: Exclusive rights and experimental use. University of Chicago Law Review, 56(3), 1017–1086.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51(11), 1153–1166.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Incremental effects of reward on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 728.Google Scholar
Federal Circuit Bar Association (2010). Model Patent Jury Instructions. Federal Circuit Bar Association.Google Scholar
Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991).Google Scholar
Fromer, J. C. (2012). Expressive incentives in intellectual property. Virginia Law Review, 98(8), 1745–1824.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, J. C. (2010). “European Copyright Code” – Back to first principles (with some additional detail). Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A., 58(2), 265–300.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79–93.Google Scholar
Gordon, W. J. (1993). A property right in self-expression: Equality and individualism in the natural law of intellectual property. Yale Law Journal, 102(7), 1533–1609.Google Scholar
Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966)Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. (2003). Is the social psychology of creativity really social? Moving beyond a focus on the individual. In Paulus, P. & Nijstad, B. (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 181–201). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hotchkiss v. Greenwood, 52 U.S. 248 (1850).Google Scholar
Jaffe, A.B., & Lerner, J. (2004). Innovation and its discontents. How our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jaszi, P. (1991). Towards a theory of copyright: The metamorphoses of “authorship.” Duke Law Journal, 40(2), 455–502.Google Scholar
Korobkin, R. B. (2003). The endowment effect and legal analysis. Northwestern Law Review, 97(3), 1227–1291.Google Scholar
KSR Int’l Co. v. Teleflex, Inc., 550 U.S. 398 (2007).Google Scholar
Kwall, R. (2001). “Author-Stories:” Narrative’s implications for moral rights and copyright’s joint authorship doctrine, Southern California Law Review, 75(1), 1–64.Google Scholar
Mandel, G. N. (2006). Patently non-obvious: Empirical demonstration that the hindsight bias renders patent decisions irrational. Ohio State Law Journal, 67(1), 1391–1463.Google Scholar
Mandel, G. N. (2007). Patently non-obvious II: Experimental study on the hindsight bias issue before the Supreme Court in KSR v. Teleflex. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 9(1), 1–43.Google Scholar
Mandel, G. N. (2010). Left brain v. right brain: Competing conceptions of creativity in intellectual property law. University of California Law Review, 44(1), 283–361.Google Scholar
Mandel, G. N. (2011). To promote the creative progress: Intellectual property law and the psychology of creativity. Notre Dame Law Review, 86(5), 1999–2026.Google Scholar
Mandel, G. N. (2012). Proxy signals: Capturing private information for public benefit. Washington University Law Review, 90(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Mandel, G. N. (2014). The public perception of intellectual property. Florida Law Review, 66(1), 261–312.Google Scholar
Mandel, G. N. Fast, A. A., & Olson, K. R. (2016). Intellectual property law’s plagiarism fallacy. BYU Law Review 2015, 915–984.Google Scholar
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 132 S. Ct. 1289 (2012).Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1999). Lawyer as problem solver and third-party neutral: Creativity and nonpartisanship in lawyering, Temple Law Review, 72(4), 785–810.Google Scholar
Merges, R. (2011). Justifying intellectual property. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, K. R., & Shaw, A. (2011). “No fair, copycat!”: What children’s response to plagiarism tells us about their understanding of ideas. Developmental Science, 14(2), 431–439.Google Scholar
Parchomovsky, G., & Stein, A. (2009). Originality. Virginia Law Review, 95(6), 1505–1550.Google Scholar
Park, C. (2003). In (other) people’s words: Plagiarism by students – literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471–488.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (2005). The (relatively) generalist view of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 307–312). Mahweh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2008). Creativity, innovation, and obviousness. Lewis & Clark Law Review, 12(2), 461–488.Google Scholar
Shaw, A., & Olson, K. (2014). Whose idea is it anyway? The importance of reputation in acknowledgement. Developmental Science, 18(3), 502–509.Google Scholar
Silbey, J. (2008). The mythical beginnings of intellectual property, George Mason Law Review, 15(2), 319–382.Google Scholar
Silbey, J. M. (2015). The eureka myth: Creators, innovators and everyday intellectual property. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, A. W., & Tomlinson, B. (2009). Patents and the regress of the useful arts. Columbia Science & Technology Law Review, 10, 130–168.Google Scholar
Torrance, A. W., & Tomlinson, B. (2011). Property rules, liability rules, and patents: One experimental view of the cathedral. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 14(1), 138–161.Google Scholar
US Constitution art. I, § 8, cl. 8.Google Scholar
References
Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 37(2), 221.Google Scholar
Anderson, T., & Mossberg, L. (2004). The dining experience: Do restaurants satisfy customer needs. Food Service Technology, 4(4), 171–177.Google Scholar
Balazs, K. (2002). Take one entrepreneur: The recipe for success of France’s great chefs. European Management Journal, 20(3), 247–259.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Hatcher, R. (2015). Applying creativity research to cooking. The Journal of Creative Behavior.Google Scholar
Birdir, K., & Pearson, T. E. (2000). Research chefs’ competencies: A Delphi approach. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 12(3), 205–209.Google Scholar
Brunori, G. (2007). Local food and alternative food networks: a communication perspective. Anthropology of food, (S2).Google Scholar
Fine, G. A. (1992). The culture of production: Aesthetic choices and constraints in culinary work. American Journal of Sociology, 1268–1294.Google Scholar
Gazzoli, J. J. (1995). The recipe for” three star” management success. Trusts and Estates-Atlanta, 134, 8–15.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, J., & Mazursky, D. (2002). Creativity in product innovation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hegarty, J. A. (2006). Developing “subject fields” in culinary arts, science, and gastronomy. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 4(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
Hegarty, J. A., & O’Mahony, G. B. (2001). Gastronomy: A phenomenon of cultural expressionism and an aesthetic for living. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 20(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
Horng, J. S., & Lee, Y. C. (2006). What does it take to be a creative culinary artist? Journal of Culinary Science and Technology, 5(2/3), 5–22.Google Scholar
Horng, J. S., & Hu, M. L. (2008). The mystery in the kitchen: Culinary creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2). 221–230.Google Scholar
Horng, J. S., & Lin, L. (2009). The development of a scale for evaluating creative culinary products. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 54–63.Google Scholar
Horng, J. S., & Tsai, C. T. S. (2010). Government websites for promoting East Asian culinary tourism: A cross-national analysis. Tourism Management, 31(1), 74–85.Google Scholar
Hsu, M. R. (2010). A modified delphi study to identify chefs’ green competencies. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Studies, 16(1). 67–88.Google Scholar
Hu, M. L. M. (2010). Developing a core competency model of innovative culinary development. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(4), 582–590.Google Scholar
Hu, M. L., Horng, J. S., Teng, C. C., & Chou, S. F. (2013). A criteria model of restaurant energy conservation and carbon reduction in Taiwan. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(5), 765–779.Google Scholar
Im, S., & Workman, J. P. Jr (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 114–132.Google Scholar
Kawasaki, H., Kasamatsu, C., & Nonaka, M. (2015). Cognitive structures based on culinary success factors in the development of new dishes by Japanese chefs at fine dining restaurants. Flavour, 4(1), 1.Google Scholar
Kittler, P. G., & Sucher, K. P. (2004). Cultural foods: Traditions and trends. EC LINK LTD.Google Scholar
Klosse, P. R., Riga, J., Cramwinckel, A. B., & Saris, W. H. (2004). The formulation and evaluation of culinary success factors (CSFs) that determine the palatability of food. Food Service Technology, 4(3), 107–115.Google Scholar
Lin, L., & Mao, P. C. (2015). Food for memories and culture: A content analysis study of food specialties and souvenirs. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 22, 19–29.Google Scholar
Okumus, B., Okumus, F., & McKercher, B. (2007). Incorporating local and international cuisines in the marketing of tourism destinations: The cases of Hong Kong and Turkey. Tourism Management, 28(1), 253–261.Google Scholar
O’Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (2006). Using the creative product semantic scale as a metric for results‐oriented business. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), 34–44.Google Scholar
Ottenbacher, M., & Harrington, R. J. (2007). The innovation development process of Michelin-starred chefs. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 19(6), 444–460.Google Scholar
Peng, K. L., Lin, M. C., & Baum, T. (2013). The constructing model of culinary creativity: an approach of mixed methods. Quality & Quantity, 47(5), 2687–2707.Google Scholar
Petruzzelli, A. M., & Savino, T. (2014). Search, recombination, and innovation: Lessons from haute cuisine. Long Range Planning, 47(4), 224–238.Google Scholar
Pratten, J. D. (2003). What makes a great chef? British Food Journal, 105(7), 454–459.Google Scholar
Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy1. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795–843.Google Scholar
Santich, B. (2004). The study of gastronomy and its relevance to hospitality education and training. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 23(1), 15–24.Google Scholar
Sims, R. (2009). Food, place and authenticity: Local food and the sustainable tourism experience. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(3), 321–336.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1988). 16 Creativity, leadership, and chance. The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives, 386.Google Scholar
Stein, S., Hinds, M., & Dern, J. H. (2004). Sustainable kitchen. New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Timothy, D. J., & Ron, A. S. (2013). Understanding heritage cuisines and tourism: Identity, image, authenticity, and change. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 8(2–3), 99–104.Google Scholar
Wilk, R. R. (1999). “Real Belizean food”: Building local identity in the transnational Caribbean. American Anthropologist, 244–255.Google Scholar
References
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cropley, D. H., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Sinnett, S. (2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work?. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 332–340.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 83–91.Google Scholar
Abernethy, B., Baker, J., & Coté, J. (2005). Transfer of pattern recall skills may contribute to the development of sport expertise. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 705–718.Google Scholar
Ashby, F. G., Valentin, V. V., & Turken, A. U. (2002). The effects of positive affect and arousal on working memory and executive attention: Neurobiology and computational models. In Moore, S. & Oaksford, M. (Eds.), Emotional cognition: From brain to behaviour (pp. 245–287). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528012.001.0001Google Scholar
Clemente, F., Couceiro, M., Martins, F. M. L., & Mendes, R. (2012). The usefulness of small-sided games on soccer training. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 12, 93–102.Google Scholar
Conway, A. R. A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M. J., Miyake, A., & Towse, J. N. (2007). Variation in working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Côté, J., Baker, J., & Abernethy, B. (2007). Play and practice in the development of sport expertise. In Tenenbaum, G. & Eklund, R.C. (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 184–202), Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 87–185. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X01003922.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberative practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.Google Scholar
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001–1013.Google Scholar
Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2010). The role of working memory in sports. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 3, 171–194.Google Scholar
Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2012). Working memory capacity as controlled attention in tactical decision making. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 322–344.Google Scholar
Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2013). “Whom should I pass to?” The more options the more attentional guidance from working. PLOS ONE 8(5): e62278. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062278Google Scholar
Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2015). Creativity and working memory capacity in sports: Working memory capacity is not a limiting factor in creative decision making amongst skilled performers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1361. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01361.Google Scholar
Furley, P., Memmert, D., & Heller, C. (2010). The dark side of visual awareness in sport – Inattentional blindness in a real-world basketball task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1327–1337.Google Scholar
Greco, P., Memmert, D., & Morales, J. C. P. (2010). The effect of deliberate play on tactical performance in basketball. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 110, 849–856.Google Scholar
Gréhaigne, J. F., & Godbout, P. (2013). Collective variables for analysing performance in team sports. In McGarry, T., O’Donoghue, P., & Sampaio, J. (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Sports Performance Analysis (pp. 101–114), Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Griffin, L. A., Mitchell, S. A., & Oslin, J. L. (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills: a tactical games approach. Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1013.Google Scholar
Hill-Haas, S. V., Dawson, B., Impellizzeri, F. M., & Coutts, A. J. (2011). Physiology of small-sided games training in football. A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 41, 199–220.Google Scholar
Hirt, E. R., Levine, G. M., McDonald, H. E., Melton, R. J., & Martin, L. L. (1997). The role of mood in quantitative and qualitative aspects of performance: Single or multiple mechanisms? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 602–629.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, P. R. (1990). Morphometric study of human cerebral cortex development. Neuropsychologia, 28, 517–527.Google Scholar
Isen, A. M. (2000). Positive affect and decision making. In Lewis, M. & Haviland-Jones, J. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd edn., pp. 417–435). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122–1131.Google Scholar
Kempe, M., & Memmert, D. (2017). Good, better, creative! The relevance of tactical creativity in world class soccer. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 25, 1608–1618.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S., & Eves, F. F. (2003). The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 376–402.Google Scholar
Memmert, D. (2007). Can creativity be improved by an attention-broadening training program? – An exploratory study focusing on team sports. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 281–292.Google Scholar
Memmert, D. (2010a). Creativity, expertise, and attention: Exploring their development and their relationships. Journal of Sport Science, 29, 93–104.Google Scholar
Memmert, D. (2010b). Testing of tactical performance in youth elite soccer. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9, 199–205.Google Scholar
Memmert, D. (2011). Sports and creativity. Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 373–378). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Memmert, D. (2013). Tactical creativity. In McGarry, T., O’Donoghue, P., & Sampaio, J. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sports performance analysis (pp. 297–308). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Memmert, D. (2015a). Teaching tactical creativity in team and racket sports: Research and practice. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Memmert, D. (2015b). Attention in sports. Fawcett, J., Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (Eds.), The handbook of attention. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Memmert, D. (2015c). Development of tactical creativity in sports. Baker, J., & Farrow, D. (Eds.), The handbook of sport expertise (pp. 363–372). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Memmert, D., & Furley, P. (2007). “I spy with my little eye!” – Breadth of attention, inattentional blindness, and tactical decision making in team sports. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 29, 365–347.Google Scholar
Memmert, D., & Harvey, S. (2010). Identification of non-specific tactical problems in invasion games. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15, 287–305.Google Scholar
Memmert, D., & Roth, K. (2007). The effects of non-specific and specific concepts on tactical creativity in team ball sports. Journal of Sport Science, 25, 1423–1432.Google Scholar
Memmert, D., Baker, J., & Bertsch, C. (2010). Play and practice in the development of sport-specific creativity in team ball sports. High Ability Studies, 21, 3–18.Google Scholar
Memmert, D., Hüttermann, S., & Orliczek, J. (2013). Decide like Lionel Messi! The impact of regulatory focus on divergent thinking in sports. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2163–2167.Google Scholar
Milgram, R. M. (1990). Creativity: An idea whose time has come and gone. In Runco, M. A. & Albert, R. S. (Eds.), Theory of creativity (pp. 215–233). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
Moraru, A., Memmert, D., & van der Kamp, J. (2016). Motor creativity: The roles of attention breadth and working memory in a divergent doing task. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28. DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2016.1201084Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, P. (2013). Sports performance profiling. In McGarry, T., O’Donoghue, P., & Sampaio, J. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sports performance analysis (pp. 127–139). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Palao, J. M., & Morante, J. C. (2013). Technical effectiveness. In McGarry, T., O’Donoghue, P., & Sampaio, J. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sports performance analysis (pp. 213–225). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pinder, R. A., Davids, K. W., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2011). Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33, 146–155.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity – theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sampaio, J., & Leite, N. (2013). Performance indicators in game sports. In McGarry, T., O’Donoghue, P., & Sampaio, J. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of sports performance analysis (pp. 115–126). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2004). Motor learning and performance. A problem-based learning approach (3rd edn.). Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
Smith, M., & Cushion, C. J. (2006). An investigation of the in-game of professional, top level youth soccer coaches. Journal of Sport Sciences 24(4), 355–366.Google Scholar
Williams, A. M., & Ericsson, K. A. (2005). Some considerations when applying the expert performance approach in sport. Human Movement Science, 24, 283–307.Google Scholar
Williams, A.M., Hodges, N.J., North, J.S., & Barton, G. (2006). Perceiving patterns of play in dynamic sport tasks: identifying the essential information underlying skilled performance. Perception, 35, 317–332.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (Ed.). (2013). Science and soccer: Developing elite performance. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
References
Allen, S. J., Bejder, L., & Krützen, M. (2010). Why do Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) carry conch shells (Turbinella sp.) in Shark Bay, Western Australia? Marine Mammal Science, 27(2), 449–454. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748–7692.2010.00409.xGoogle Scholar
Ashe, E. E., Heithaus, M. R., & Marshall, G. J. (2003). Studies of foraging in “southern resident” killer whales during July 2002: Dive depths, bursts in speed, and the use of a “Crittercam” system for examining sub-surface behavior. National Marine Fisheries Service, National Marine Mammal Laboratory.Google Scholar
Auersperg, A. M. I., Szabo, B., von Bayern, A. M. P., & Kacelnik, A. (2012). Spontaneous innovation in tool manufacture and use in a Goffin’s cockatoo. Current Biology, 22(21), R903–904. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.002Google Scholar
Auersperg, A. M. I., van Horik, J. O., Bugnyar, T., Kacelnik, A., Emery, N. J., & von Bayern, A. M. P. (2015). Combinatory actions during object play in parrots (Psittacus erithacus) and corvids (Corvus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 1, 62–71.Google Scholar
Auersperg, A. M. I., von Bayern, A. M. I., Weber, S., Szabadvari, A., Bugnyar, T., & Kacelnik, A. (2014). Social transmission of tool use and tool manufacture in Goffin cockatoos (Cacatua goffini). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1793), 20140972–20140972. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0972Google Scholar
Belzung, C. (2010). Open-field test. In Stolerman, I. P. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychopharmacology (pp. 920–926). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Beran, M. J., & Parrish, A. E. (2012). Sequential responding and planning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Animal Cognition, 15(6), 1085–1094.Google Scholar
Boogert, N. J., Reader, S. M., Hoppitt, W., & Laland, K. N. (2008). The origin and spread of innovations in starlings. Animal Behaviour, 75(4), 1509–1518. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.033Google Scholar
Boogert, N. J., Reader, S. M., & Laland, K. N. (2006). The relation between social rank, neophobia and individual learning in starlings. Animal Behaviour, 72(6), 1229–1239. Retrieved on November 10, 2016, from www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W9 W-4M1DB4 C-1/2/a54cdd8d1e495ece5335553bc0a6b1d8Google Scholar
Bourjade, M., Call, J., Pelé, M., Maumy, M., & Dufour, V. (2014). Bonobos and orangutans, but not chimpanzees, flexibly plan for the future in a token-exchange task. Animal Cognition. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-014–0768-6Google Scholar
Brosnan, S., & Hopper, L. (2014). Psychological limits on animal innovation. Animal Behaviour. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.026Google Scholar
Brydson, R. (2014). Incipient tradition in wild chimpanzees. Physical Sciences, 12, 9–10.Google Scholar
Burkart, J. M., Strasser, A., & Foglia, M. (2009). Trade-offs between social learning and individual innovativeness in common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus. Animal Behaviour, 77(5), 1291–1301. Retrieved on November 15, 2016, from www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W9 W-4VW4VC9-3/2/b5a6092d93262e59736d231c16d00926Google Scholar
Cantor, M., & Whitehead, H. (2013). The interplay between social networks and culture: theoretically and among whales and dolphins. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 368(1618), 20120340. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0340Google Scholar
Cnotka, J., Gunturkun, O., Rehkämpera, G., Gray, R. D., & Hunt, G. R. (2008). Extraordinary large brains in tool-using New Caledonian crows. Neuroscience Letters, 433, 241–245.Google Scholar
Day, R. L., Coe, R. L., Kendal, J. R., & Laland, K. N. (2003). Neophilia, innovation and social learning: A study of intergeneric differences in callitrichid monkeys. Animal Behavior, 65(3), 559–572.Google Scholar
Dellu, F., Mayo, W., Piazza, P. V. V, Le Moal, M., & Simon, H. (1993). Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty in rats. Possible relationship with the sensation-seeking trait in man. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(4), 411–418. http://doi.org/10.1016/0191–8869(93)90069-FGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factor of personality. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 825–858.Google Scholar
Dinets, V., & Brueggen, J. C. J. D. (2013). Crocodilians use tools for hunting. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 27(1), 1–5. http://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2013.858276Google Scholar
Fisher, J., & Hinde, R. A. (1949). The opening of milk bottles by birds. British Birds, 42, 347–357.Google Scholar
Freeman, H. D., Brosnan, S. F., Hopper, L. M., Lambeth, S. P., Schapiro, S. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2013). Developing a comprehensive and comparative questionnaire for measuring personality in chimpanzees using a simultaneous top-down/bottom-up design. American Journal of Primatology. http://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22168Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. (2015). Proto-c creativity? In Kaufman, A. B. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), Animal creativity and innovation (pp. 120–128). Waltham, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, A. S., Lermite, F., Perea, M., & Guez, D. (2013). To innovate or not: contrasting effects of social groupings on safe and risky foraging in Indian mynahs. Animal Behaviour. Retrieved on October 29, 2016 from www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347213004399Google Scholar
Heck, P. S., & Ghosh, S. (2000). A study of synthetic creativity: Behavior modeling and simulation of an ant colony. IEEE Expert Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 15(6), 58–67. http://doi.org/10.1109/5254.895863Google Scholar
Heck, P. S., & Ghosh, S. (2002). The design and role of synthetic creative traits in artificial ant colonies. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 33(4), 343–370. Retrieved on November 15, 2015 from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1015552602374 <Go to ISI>://000175751000001://000175751000001>Google Scholar
Herrmann, E., & Call, J. (2012). Are there geniuses among the apes? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367(1603), 2753–61. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0191Google Scholar
Heyes, C. M. (2012). What’s social about social learning? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 193–202.Google Scholar
Highfill, L. E., & Kuczaj, S. A. (2007). Do bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) have distinct and stable personalities? Aquatic Mammals, 33(3), 380–389.Google Scholar
Huebner, F., & Fichtel, C. (2015). Innovation and behavioral flexibility in wild redfronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons). Animal Cognition, 18(3), 777–787. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015–0844-6Google Scholar
Huffman, M., & Hirata, S. (2003). Biological and ecological foundations of primate behavioral traditions. The biology of traditions: Models and evidence. In Fragaszy, Dorothy M. and Perry, Susan (Eds.), The Biology of Traditions (pp. 267–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. B., Butt, A. E., Kaufman, J. C., & Colbert-White, E. N. (2011). Towards a neurobiology of creativity in nonhuman animals. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125(3), 255–272.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Applying theoretical models on human creativity to animal studies. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 1(1), 78–90. http://doi.org/10.12966/abc.02.01.2014Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. B., & Rosenthal, R. (2009). Can you believe my eyes? The importance of interobserver reliability statistics in observations of animal behaviour. Animal Behaviour, 78(6), 1487–1491. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.09.014Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Kaufman, A. B. (2004). Applying a creativity framework to animal cognition. New Ideas in Psychology, 22(2), 143–155. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2004.09.006Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Opening up openness to experience: A four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 233–255.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Ten years to expertise, many more to greatness: An investigation of modern writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(2), 114–124.Google Scholar
Kawai, M. (1965). Newly-acquired pre-cultural behavior of the natural troop of Japanese monkeys on Koshima islet. Primates, 6(1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Kenward, B., Weir, A. A. S., Rutz, C., & Kacelnik, A. (2005). Behavioural ecology: Tool manufacture by naive juvenile crows. Nature, 433(7022), 121.Google Scholar
Kopps, A. M., Ackermann, C. Y., Sherwin, W. B., Allen, S. J., Bejder, L., Krutzen, M., & Krützen, M. (2014). Cultural transmission of tool use combined with habitat specializations leads to fine-scale genetic structure in bottlenose dolphins. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1782), 20133245–20133245. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3245Google Scholar
Krueger, K., Farmer, K., & Heinze, J. (2014). The effects of age, rank and neophobia on social learning in horses. Animal Cognition, 17(3), 645–55. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013–0696-xGoogle Scholar
Kruetzen, M., Mann, J., Heithaus, M. R., Connor, R. C., Bejder, L., Sherwin, W. B., & Sherman, W. B. (2005). Cultural Transmission of Tool Use in Bottlenose Dolphins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(25), 8939–8943. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500232102Google Scholar
Krützen, M., Kreicker, S., Macleod, C. D., Learmonth, J., Kopps, A. M., Walsham, P., & Allen, S. J. (2014). Cultural transmission of tool use by Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) provides access to a novel foraging niche. Proceedings. Biological Sciences / The Royal Society, 281(1784), 20140374. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0374Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A., & Eskelinen, H. C. (2014). The “Creative Dolphin” revisited: What do dolphins do when asked to vary their behavior? Animal Behavior and Cognition, 1(1), 66–77. http://doi.org/10.12966/abc.02.05.2014Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A., Gory, J. D., & Xitco, M. J. Jr (2009). How intelligent are dolphins? A partial answer based on their ability to plan their behavior when confronted with novel problems. Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology, 59(1), 99–115.Google Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A., Highfill, L., & Byerly, H. (2012). The importance of considering context in the assessment of personality characteristics: Evidence from ratings of dolphin personality. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 25(4), 309–329. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4hg0p6cq.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A., Makecha, R., Trone, M., Paulos, R. D. R. D., & Ramos, J. A. A. J. A. (2006). Role of peers in cultural innovation and cultural transmission: Evidence from the play of dolphin calves. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 19(2), 223–240. Retrieved on October 25, 2016 from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4pn1t50s.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kuczaj, S. A., Xitco, M. J. Jr, & Gory, J. D. (2010). Can dolphins plan their behavior? International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 23(4), 664–670. Retrieved on November 15, 2016, from http://comparativepsychology.org/ijcp-2010–4/07.Kuczaj_etal_Final.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, L. (1995). The opening of milk bottles by birds: Evidence for accelerating learning rates, but against the wave-of-advance model of cultural transmission. Behavioral Processes, 34, 43–54.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Reader, S. M., & Sol, D. (2004). Brains, innovations, and evolution in birds and primates. Brain, Behavior, and Evolution, 63(4), 233–246. http://doi.org/10.1159/000076784Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Reader, S. M., & Sol, D. (2013). Innovating innovation rate and its relationship with brains, ecology and general intelligence. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 81(3), 143–5. http://doi.org/10.1159/000348485Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Timmermans, S., & Rosza, L. (1998). Feeding Innovations and forebrain size in Australasian birds. Behaviour, 135, 1007–1097.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, L., Whittle, P., Lascaris, E., & Finklestein, A. (1997). Feeding innovations and forebrain size in birds. Animal Behavior, 53, 549–560.Google Scholar
Mann, J., Sargeant, B. L., Watson-Capps, J. J., Gibson, Q. A., Heithaus, M. R., Connor, R. C., & Patterson, E. (2008). Why do dolphins carry sponges? PloS One, 3(12), e3868. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003868Google Scholar
Mazur, R., & Seher, V. (2008). Socially learned foraging behaviour in wild black bears, Ursus americanus. Animal Behaviour, 75(4), 1503–1508. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.10.027Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.Google Scholar
Menzel, E. W., Davenport, R. K., & Rogers, C. M. (1961). Some aspects of behavior toward novelty in young chimpanzees. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 54, 16–19.Google Scholar
Mery, F., & Burns, J. (2010). Behavioral plasticity: An interaction between evolution and experience. Evolutionary Ecology, 24, 571–583.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. W., Thompson, N. S., & Miles, H. L. (1997). Taking anthropomorphism and anecdotes seriously. In Mitchell, R. W., Thompson, N. S., & Miles, H. L. (Eds.), Anthropomorphism, anecdotes, and animals. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Monteiro de Almeida Rocha, J., Pedreira dos Reis, P., & de Carvalho Oliveira, L. (2014). Play behavior of the golden-headed lion tamarin in Brazilian cocoa agroforests. Folia Primatologica, 85(3), 192–199. http://doi.org/10.1159/10.1159/000362813Google Scholar
Montgomery, S. H. (2014). The relationship between play, brain growth and behavioural flexibility in primates. Animal Behaviour, 90, 281–286. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.004Google Scholar
Morand-Ferron, J., Lefebvre, L., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., & Elvin, S. (2004). Dunking behaviour in Carib grackles. Animal Behaviour, 68(6), 1267–1274.Google Scholar
Ottoni, E. B., de Resende, B. D., Izar, P., & Resende, B. D. (2005). Watching the best nutcrackers: What capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) know about others’ tool-using skills. Animal Cognition, 24(4), 215–219. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-004–0245-8Google Scholar
Overington, S. E., Morand-Ferron, J., Boogert, N. J., & Lefebvre, L. (2009). Technical innovations drive the relationship between innovativeness and residual brain size in birds. Animal Behaviour, 78(4), 1001–1010. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.033Google Scholar
Patricelli, G. L., Coleman, S. W., & Borgia, G. (2006). Male satin bowerbirds, Ptilonorhunchus violaceus, adjust their display intensity in response to female startling: An experiment with robotic females. Animal Behavior, 71(1), 49–59. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.03.029Google Scholar
Pryor, K. W. (2014). Historical perspectives: A dolphin journey. Aquatic Mammals, 40(1), 104–114.Google Scholar
Pryor, K. W., Haag, R., & O’Reilly, J. (1969). The creative porpoise: Training for novel behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12(4), 653. Retrieved on November 30, 2016, from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1338662/Google Scholar
Ramsey, G., Bastian, M. L., & van Schaik, C. (2007). Animal innovation defined and operationalized. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(4), 393–407; discussion 407–32. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07002373Google Scholar
Reader, S. M., & Laland, K. N. (2002). Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(7), 4436–4441. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.062041299Google Scholar
Reader, S. M., & Laland, K. N. (Eds.). (2003). Animal innovation: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reader, S. M., & Laland, K. N. N. (2001). Primate innovation: Sex, age and social rank differences. International Journal of Primatology, 22(5), 787–805. Retrieved on October 15, 2015, from www.springerlink.com/index/ln47117526184421.pdfGoogle Scholar
Reader, S. M., & MacDonald, K. (2003). Environmental variability and primate flexibility. In Reader, S. M. & Laland, K. N. (Eds.), Animal innovation (pp. 83–116). Oxford: Oxford Univ Press.Google Scholar
Reale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T., Dingemanse, N. J., & Réale, D. (2007). Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biological Reviews, 82(2), 291–318. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00010.xGoogle Scholar
Rendell, L. E., Mesnick, S. L., Dalebout, M. L., Burtenshaw, J., & Whitehead, H. (2011). Can genetic differences explain vocal dialect variation in sperm whales, Physetermacrocephalus? Behavior Genetics, 42(2), 332–43. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-011–9513-yGoogle Scholar
Rendell, L. E., & Whitehead, H. (2001). Culture in whales and dolphins. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(2), 309–382. Retrieved on November 25, 2016, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11530544 <Go to ISI>://000170177900061://000170177900061>Google Scholar
Rymer, T., Schradin, C., & Pillay, N. (2008). Social transmission of information about novel food in two populations of the African striped mouse, Rhabdomys pumilio. Animal Behaviour, 76(4), 1297–1304. Retrieved on November 15, 2016, from www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W9W-4T1SKGD-1/2/05b77926cd3356c31853a5e8e5f24c39Google Scholar
Sargeant, B. L., & Mann, J. (2009). Developmental evidence for foraging traditions in wild bottlenose dolphins. Animal Behaviour, 78(3), 715–721. Retrieved on November 24, 2016, from www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W9W-4WWPFWR-2/2/c599b183fc722418d061b4c8005b81a2Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2003). The Cambridge companion to Greek and Roman philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sirianni, G., Mundry, R., & Boesch, C. (2015). When to choose which tool: Multidimensional and conditional selection of nut-cracking hammers in wild chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 100, 152–165. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.11.022Google Scholar
Sol, D., & Lefebvre, L. (2000). Behavioral flexibility predicts invasion success in birds introduced to New Zealand. Oikos, 90, 599–615.Google Scholar
Sol, D., Timmermans, S., & Lefebvre, L. (2002). Behavioral flexibility and invasion success in birds. Animal Behavior, 60, 495–502.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stöwe, M., Bugnyar, T., Heinrich, B., Kotrschal, K., & Stowe, M. (2006). Effects of group size on approach to novel objects in ravens (Corvus corax). Ethology, 112(11), 1079–1088. http://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1439–0310.2006.01273.xGoogle Scholar
Stöwe, M., & Kotrschal, K. (2007). Behavioural phenotypes may determine whether social context facilitates or delays novel object exploration in ravens (Corvus corax). Journal of Ornithology, 148(S2), 179–184. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-007–0145-1Google Scholar
Thornton, A., & Malapert, A. (2009). Experimental evidence for social transmission of food acquisition techniques in wild meerkats. Animal Behaviour, 78(2), 255–264. Retrieved on October 30, 2016, from www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W9W-4WKJ5GC-1/2/12eb7df91fb86724be45a89cce069b1eGoogle Scholar
Weir, A. A. S., Chappell, J., & Kacelnik, A. (2002). Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science (New York, N.Y.), 297(5583), 981. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073433Google Scholar
Wimpenny, J. H., Weir, A. A. S., Clayton, L., Rutz, C., & Kacelnik, A. (2009). Cognitive processes associated with sequential tool use in New Caledonian crows. PloS One, 4(8), e6471. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006471Google Scholar
Yi, X., Plucker, J. A., & Guo, J. (2015). Modeling influences on divergent thinking and artistic creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 62–68. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.02.002Google Scholar
References
Ackerman, G. (2015). The theoretical underpinnings of terrorist innovation decisions. In Ranstorp, M. and Normack, M. (Eds.), Understanding terrorism innovation and learning learning: Al-Qaeda and Beyond (pp. 19–52). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Asal, V., & Rethemeyer, R. K. (2008). The nature of the beast: Organizational structures and the lethality of terrorist attacks. The Journal of Politics, 70, 437–449. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381608080419Google Scholar
Crenshaw, M. (1981). The causes of terrorism. Comparative Politics, 13(4), 379–399. DOI: 10.2307/421717Google Scholar
Cropley, D. H., Cropley, A. J., Kaufman, J., & Runco, M. A. (2010). The dark side of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105–115. DOI: 10.1080/10400410802059424Google Scholar
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., White, A. E., & Chiera, B. A. (2014). Layperson perceptions of malevolent creativity: The good, the bad, and the ambiguous. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 400.Google Scholar
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: Meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 555–590.Google Scholar
Derrick, D. C., Ligon, G., Harms, M., Mahoney, W., & Crowe, J. (2015). Cyber sophistication assessment methodology for public facing terrorist websites. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Dolnik, A. (2007). Understanding terrorist innovation: Technology, tactics and global trends. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dolnik, A. (2015). “The dynamics of terrorist innovation.” In Ranstorp, M. and Normack, M. (Eds.), Understanding terrorism innovation and learning learning: Al-Qaeda and Beyond (pp. 76–95). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Drake, C. J. (1998). The role of ideology in terrorists’ target selection. Terrorism and Political Violence, 10(2), 53–85. DOI: 10.1080/09546559808427457Google Scholar
Eisenman, R. (1991). From crime to creativity: Psychological and social factors in deviance. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (2002). FinCEN Portal and Query System. The United States Department of the Treasury. Retrieved on April 11, 2017, from www.fincen.gov/Google Scholar
Gates, S., & Podder, S. (2015). Social media, recruitment, allegiance, and the Islamic State. Perspectives on Terrorism, 9(4), 2334–3745. Retrieved on April 11, 2017, from www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/446/htmlGoogle Scholar
Gill, P., Horgan, J., & Lovelace, J. (2011). Improvised explosive device: The problem of definition. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 34(9), 732–748. DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2011.594946Google Scholar
Gill, P., Horgan, J., Hunter, S. T., & Cushenbery, L. D. (2013). Malevolent creativity in terrorist organizations. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(2), 125–151. DOI: 10.1002/jocb.28Google Scholar
Harris, D. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The effect of emotional intelligence and task type on malevolent creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 237–244. DOI: 10.1037/a0032139Google Scholar
Horgan, J. (2009). Walking away from terrorism: Accounts of disengagement from radical and extremist movement. New York: Routeledge.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. C. (2010). Nonstate actors and the diffusion of innovations: The case of suicide terrorism. International Organization, 64, 33–64. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818309990233Google Scholar
Hunter, S. T., Shortland, N., Crayne, M., & Ligon, G. S. (2015). Recruitment and selection in violent extremist organizations: Viewing through an industrial and organizational psychology lens. Manuscript submitted for publication to the American Psychologist.Google Scholar
Ligon, G. S. (2010). Organizational determinants of violence. College Park, MD: Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.Google Scholar
Ligon, G. S. (2013). Organizational determinants of violence: Research Brief. National Consortium for Studies of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), August 2013 Newsletter.Google Scholar
Ligon, G. S., & Derrick, D. C. (2015). Violent extremist organizations decision making. The science of decision making across the span of human activity. A Strategic Multi-Layer (SMA) Periodic Publication. May 2015.Google Scholar
Ligon, G. S., Harms, M., Crowe, J., Simi, P., & Lundmark, L. (2014). ISIL: Branding, leadership culture and lethal attraction. College Park, MD: Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.Google Scholar
Ligon, G. S., Harms, M., & Derrick, D. C. (2015). Lethal brands: How VEOs build reputations. Journal of Strategic Security, 8, 27.Google Scholar
Ligon, G. S., Harms, M., & Harris, D. J. (2014). Organizational determinants of violence and performance: The L.E.A.D.I.R. study and dataset. College Park, MD: Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.Google Scholar
Ligon, G. S., Simi, P., Harms, M., & Harris, D. J. (2013). Putting the ‘O’ in VEO: What makes an organization. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict: Pathways toward Terrorism and Genocide, 6(1–3), 110–134. DOI: 10.1080/17467586.2013.814069Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295–308. DOI: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07Google Scholar
McCauley, C. (1998). Group dynamics in Janis’s theory of groupthink: Backward and forward. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73(2–3), 142–162. DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2759Google Scholar
McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2008). Mechanisms of political radicalization: Pathways toward terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20(3), 415–433. DOI: 10.1080/09546550802073367Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Espejo, J., Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., Eubanks, D. L., & Connelly, S. (2007). The sources of leader violence: A comparison of ideological and non-ideological leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(3), 217–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.005Google Scholar
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter-Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122. DOI: 10.1080/10400419109534380Google Scholar
Rasmussen, M. J., & Hafez, M. M. (2010). Terrorist innovations in weapons of mass effect: Preconditions, causes, and predictive indicators (Report Number ASCO 2010–019). Retrieved on April 11, 2017 from: http://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/25358/2010_019_Terrorist_WME.pdf?sequence=1Google Scholar
Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 483–503.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J. N. (2013). The terrorist’s dilemma: Managing violent covert organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simi, P., & Futrell, R. (2009). Negotiating white power activist stigma. Social Problems, 56, 89–110.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1990). Psychology, science, and history: An introduction to historiometry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sinai, J. (2015). Innovation in terrorists’ counter-surveillance: The case of al-Qaeda and its affiliates. In Ranstorp, M. and Normack, M. (Eds.), Understanding terrorism innovation and learning: Al-Qaeda and Beyond (pp. 196–210). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stern, J., & Berger, J. M. (2015). ISIS: The state of terror. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
Styszyński, M. (2014). Present trends among jihadists after the Arab Spring. Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe, 3, 25–49. Retrieved on April 11, 2017, from http://ksm.ka.edu.pl/tresc/KSM-3–2014-Styszynski.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C. (1996). Evolution and revolution: Mastering the dynamics of innovation and change. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
United States Institutes of Peace (2006). How modern terrorism uses the internet. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace. Retrieved on April 11, 2017, from www.usip.orgGoogle Scholar
Weiss, M., & Hassan, H. (2015). ISIS: Inside the army of terror. New York: Regan Arts.Google Scholar