Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:55:25.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

34 - Creativity in Craft

from Part VI - Creativity in Everyday Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2017

James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Vlad P. Glăveanu
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Bergen, Norway
John Baer
Affiliation:
Rider University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Abstract

This chapter reviews research in the area of creativity and craft in psychology and connected disciplines. It stars by asking whether craft can be considered a domain and, in particular, if it is a creative one. Reflecting on the meaning of creativity in craftwork, it is argued both that a new definition of creativity is needed to capture aspects specific for this domain and that craft-like practices underpin creative activity in most other creative domains. Research on creative craft is presented in relation to its focus on creative actors, audiences, actions, artifacts, and affordances. Methodological issues associated with the study of craft are also reviewed and proposals made for a more comprehensive approach to craft creativity. In the end, four themes are abstracted from this domain and their relevance for the broader field of creativity studies is discussed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1978). Arts and crafts. American Journal of Sociology, 83(4), 862889.Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 7379.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. (1938). The principles of art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, P., & Allen, N. B. (1999). The quilters: Women and domestic art, an oral history. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.Google Scholar
Crook, T. (2009). Craft and the dialogics of modernity: The Arts and Crafts movement in late-Victorian and Edwardian England. The Journal of Modern Craft, 2(1), 1732.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dalidowicz, M. (2015). Crafting fidelity: pedagogical creativity in kathak dance. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 21, 838854.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fine, G. A. (2004). Everyday genius: Self-taught art and the culture of authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Creativity in context: The ecology of creativity evaluations and practices in an artistic craft. Psychological Studies, 55(4), 339350.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2012a). A multiple feedback methodology for the study of creativity evaluations. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 25(4), 346366.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2012b). Habitual creativity: Revisiting habit, reconceptualising creativity. Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 7892.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013a). Creativity and folk art: A study of creative action in traditional craft. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(2), 140154.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013b). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 6981.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013c). Creativity development in community contexts: The case of folk art. Thinking Skills & Creativity, 9, 152164.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165180.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2016). Craft. In Glăveanu, V. P., Tanggaard, L., & Wegener, C. (Eds.), Creativity – A new vocabulary (pp. 2835). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., & Lahlou, S. (2012). Through the creator’s eyes: Using the subjective camera to study craft creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 152162.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., & Tanggaard, L. (2014). Creativity, identity, and representation: Towards a socio-cultural theory of creative identity. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 1221.Google Scholar
Gowlland, G. (2009). Style, skill and modernity in the Zisha pottery of China. The Journal of Modern Craft, 2(2), 129141.Google Scholar
Guth, C. M. E. (2010). The multiple modalities of the copy in traditional Japanese crafts. The Journal of Modern Craft, 3(1), 718.Google Scholar
Hughes-Freeland, F. (2007). ‘Tradition and the individual talent’: T.S. Eliot for anthropologists. In Hallam, E. & Ingold, T. (Eds.), Creativity and cultural improvisation (pp. 207222). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Ings, W. (2015). Malleable thought: The role of craft thinking in practice-led graphic design. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 34(2), 180191.Google Scholar
Junaidy, D. W., Nagai, Y., & Ihsan, M. (2013). Craftsmen versus designers: The difference of in-depth cognitive levels at the early stage of idea generation. In Chakrabarti, A., & Prakash, R. V. (Eds.), ICoRD’13, Lecture notes in mechanical engineering (pp. 223234). New Delhi: Springer.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A., & Durmysheva, Y. (2007). Lifespan creativity in a non-Western artistic tradition: A study of Japanese ukiyo-e printmakers. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(1), 2351.Google Scholar
Lehmann, U. (2012). Making as knowing: Epistemology and technique in craft. The Journal of Modern Craft, 5(2), 149164.Google Scholar
Li, J. (1997). Creativity in horizontal and vertical domains. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2–3), 107132.Google Scholar
Mace, M. A., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the creative process: A grounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 179192.Google Scholar
Mall, A. S. (2007). Structure, innovation and agency in pattern construction: The Kōlam of Southern India. In Hallam, E. & Ingold, T. (Eds.), Creativity and cultural improvisation (pp. 5578). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Negus, K., & Pickering, M. (2004). Creativity, communication and cultural value. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The philosophical roots of Western and Eastern conceptions of creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 26(1–2), 1838.Google Scholar
Pöllänen, S. (2013). The meaning of craft: Craft makers’ descriptions of craft as an occupation. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(3), 217227.Google Scholar
Pye, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship. London: The Herbert Press.Google Scholar
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In Wertsch, J. V., del Rio, P. & Alvarez, A. (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scarlett, S. F. (2011). The craft of industrial patternmaking. The Journal of Modern Craft, 4(1), 2748.Google Scholar
Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. New Have: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shiner, L. (2012). “Blurred boundaries”? Rethinking the concept of craft and its relation to art and design. Philosophy Compass, 7(4), 230244.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1989). Age and creative productivity: Nonlinear estimation of an information-processing model. The International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 29(1), 2337.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, P. D. (2001). Variability, constraints, and creativity: Shedding light of Claude Monet. American Psychologist, 56(4), 355359.Google Scholar
Yokochi, S., & Okada, T. (2005). Creative cognitive process of art making: A field study of a traditional Chinese ink painter. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2, 3), 241255.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×