Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:54:07.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - Do People Know the Law? Empirical Evidence about Legal Knowledge and Its Implications for Compliance

from Part V - Capacity and Opportunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2021

Benjamin van Rooij
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Amsterdam
D. Daniel Sokol
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Abstract: Legal knowledge is a core aspect in compliance. For law to shape behaviour, people whose conduct the law tries to influence should know the law. This chapter reviews the body of existing empirical research about legal knowledge. It assesses the extent to which laypersons and professionals know and understand legal rules across various domains including employment, family affairs, criminal justice, education and health care. This body of work shows that ignorance and misunderstanding of the law are common across these domains. There is variation and for some laws, amongst some people and in some jurisdictions, there is more or less legal knowledge. Also, the review shows that there is evidence that people tend to equate their own norms with the rules of the law. The chapter concludes by discussing what these findings mean for compliance and the way our laws try to steer human and organisational conduct. Here it questions compliance approaches that view it as a linear process from rule to behaviour.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., Levi-Faur, David and Snidal, Duncan. 2017. ‘Theorizing Regulatory Intermediaries: The RIT Model’. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 670 no. 1: 1435.Google Scholar
Abegglen, W. P. (1986). ‘Knowledge of United States Supreme Court Decisions Affecting Education Held by Selected Tennessee Public School Personnel (Law)’. PhD Thesis, East Tennessee State University. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2621.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Stan L., and Green, Miles. 1977. ‘Cognitive Barriers to Equal Justice before the Law’. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 14 no. 2: 206–21.Google Scholar
Apel, Robert. 2013. ‘Sanctions, Perceptions, and Crime: Implications for Criminal Deterrence’. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 29 no. 1: 67101.Google Scholar
Bench-Capon, Trevor J. M. 2015. Knowledge-Based Systems and Legal Applications, Vol. 36. Brighton, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bench-Capon, Trevor J. M., and Coenen, Frans P.. 1992. ‘Isomorphism and Legal Knowledge-Based Systems’. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 no. 1:6586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowal, Peter. 1998. ‘A Study of Lay Knowledge of Law in Canada’. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 9: 121.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, Caitlin, and Cauffman, Elizabeth. 2017. ‘What They Don’t Know Can Hurt Them: Mothers’ Legal Knowledge and Youth Re-offending’. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 23 no. 2: 141.Google Scholar
CCH Tax Law Editors. 2016. Internal Revenue Code: Income, Estate, Gift, Employment and Excise Taxes. New York: Wolters Kluwer CCH.Google Scholar
Chate, R. A. C. 2008. ‘An Audit of the Level of Knowledge and Understanding of Informed Consent amongst Consultant Orthodontists in England, Wales and Northern Ireland’. British Dental Journal 205 no. 12: 665.Google Scholar
Clark, T. R. 1990. ‘Mississippi Superintendents’ and Secondary Educators’ Knowledge of School Law as It Relates to Student Rights in Selected Areas’. PhD Thesis, University of Southern Mississippi. https://aquila.usm.edu/theses_dissertations/2745/.Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. Jr 1991. ‘Does Unlawful Mean Criminal?: Reflections on the Disappearing Tort/Crime Distinction in American Law’. Boston University Law Review 71: 193.Google Scholar
Cortese, Charles. 1966. ‘A Study in Knowledge and Attitudes toward the Law: The Legal Knowledge Inventory’. Rocky Mountain Social Science Journal 3: 192204.Google Scholar
Darley, John M., Carlsmith, Kevin M. and Robinson, Paul H.. 2001. ‘The Ex Ante Function of the Criminal Law’. Law and Society Review:165–90.Google Scholar
Darley, John M., Sanderson, Catherine A. and LaMantia, Peter S.. 1996. ‘Community Standards for Defining Attempt Inconsistencies with the Model Penal Code’. American Behavioral Scientist 39 no. 4: 405–20.Google Scholar
Denvir, Catrina, Balmer, Nigel J. and Buck, Alexy. 2012. ‘Informed Citizens? Knowledge of Rights and the Resolution of Civil Justice Problems’. Journal of Social Policy 41 no. 3: 591614.Google Scholar
Denvir, Catrina, Balmer, Nigel J. and Pleasence, Pascoe. 2013. ‘When Legal Rights Are Not a Reality: Do Individuals Know Their Rights and How Can We Tell?’. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 35 no.1: 139–60.Google Scholar
Eberwein III, Howard Jacob. 2008. Raising Legal Literacy in Public Schools: A Call for Principal Leadership: A National Study of Secondary School Principals’ Knowledge of Public School Law. University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., and Talesh, Shauhin A.. 2011. ‘To Comply or Not to Comply – That Isn’t the Question: How Organizations Construct the Meaning of Compliance’. Explaining Compliance: Business Responses to Regulation:103–22.Google Scholar
Edwards, Deborah L., and Mahling, Dirk E.. 1997. ‘Toward Knowledge Management Systems in the Legal Domain’. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work: The Integration Challenge.Google Scholar
Estlund, Cynthia L. 2002. ‘How Wrong Are Employees about Their Rights, and Why Does It Matter?New York University Law Review 77: 6.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Mary E. 2006. ‘Mobilizing the Law in China: “Informed Disenchantment” and the Development of Legal Consciousness’. Law & Society Review 40 no. 4: 783816.Google Scholar
Ginther, Matthew R., Shen, Francis X., Bonnie, Richard J. and Hoffman, Morris B.. 2014. ‘The Language of Men’s Rea’. Vanderbilt Law Review 67: 1327.Google Scholar
Ginther, Matthew R., Shen, Francis X., Bonnie, Richard J., Hoffman, Morris B., Jones, Owen D. and Simons, Kenneth W.. 2018. ‘Decoding Guilty Minds: How Jurors Attribute Knowledge and Guilt’. Vanderbilt Law Review 71: 241.Google Scholar
Givelber, Daniel J., Bowers, William J. and Blitch, Carolyn L.. 1984. ‘Tarasoff, Myth and Reality: An Empirical Study of Private Law in Action’. Wisconsin Law Review: 443.Google Scholar
Goodwin-De Faria, Christine, and Marinos, Voula. 2012. ‘Youth Understanding & Assertion of Legal Rights: Examining the Roles of Age and Power’. International Journal of Children’s Rights 20 no. 3: 343–64.Google Scholar
Gray, G., and Pelisse, J.. 2019. ‘Frontline Workers and the Role of Legal and Regulatory Intermediaries’. Sciences Po LIEPP Working Paper, n°94, 2019–10–12.Google Scholar
Grisso, Thomas, Steinberg, Laurence, Woolard, Jennifer, Cauffman, Elizabeth, Scott, Elizabeth, Graham, Sandra, Lexcen, Fran, Dickon Reppucci, N. and Schwartz, Robert. 2003. ‘Juveniles’ Competence to Stand Trial: A Comparison of Adolescents’ and Adults’ Capacities as Trial Defendants’. Law and Human Behavior 27 no. 4: 333–63.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1982. ‘Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy’. Journal of Legal Education 32: 591.Google Scholar
Kim, Pauline T. 1998. ‘An Empirical Challenge to Employment at Will’. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations 23 no. 2: 91.Google Scholar
Kim, Pauline T. 1999. ‘Norms, Learning and Law: Exploring the Influences of Workers’ Legal Knowledge’. University of Illinois Legal Review 1999 no. 2: 447516.Google Scholar
Leary, Thomas B. 1990. ‘The Commission’s New Option That Favors Judicial Discretion in Corporate Sentencing’. Federal Sentencing Reporter 3: 142.Google Scholar
Littleton, Mark. 2008. ‘Teachers’ Knowledge of Education Law’. Action in Teacher Education 30 no. 2: 71–8.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari. 1988. ‘Affirmative Action and Legal Knowledge: Planting Seeds in Plowed-Up Ground’. Harvard Women’s Law Journal 11: 1.Google Scholar
Militello, M., Schimmel, D. and Eberwein, H. J.. 2009. ‘If They Knew, They Would Change: How Legal Knowledge Impacts Principals’ Practice’. NASSP Bulletin 93 no. 1: 2752.Google Scholar
Moore, S. J. 1997. ‘An Assessment of Selected Knowledge of School Law from Public Educators in the State of Tennessee’. PhD Thesis, Tennessee State University. https://digitalscholarship.tnstate.edu/dissertations/AAI9806345/.Google Scholar
Pleasence, Pascoe, and Balmer, Nigel J.. 2012. ‘Ignorance in Bliss: Modeling Knowledge of Rights in Marriage and Cohabitation’. Law & Society Review 46 no. 2: 297333.Google Scholar
Pleasence, Pascoe, Balmer, Nigel J. and Denvir, Catrina. 2017. ‘Wrong about Rights: Public Knowledge of Key Areas of Consumer, Housing and Employment Law in England and Wales’. Modern Law Review 80 no. 5: 836–59.Google Scholar
Reifman, Alan, Gusick, Spencer M. and Ellsworth, Phoebe C.. 1992. ‘Real Jurors’ Understanding of the Law in Real Cases’. Law and Human Behavior 16 no. 5: 539–54.Google Scholar
Riles, Annelise. 2006. ‘Anthropology, Human Rights, and Legal Knowledge: Culture in the Iron Cage’. American Anthropologist 108 no. 1: 5265.Google Scholar
Rudy, Jesse. 2002. ‘What They Don’t Know Won’t Hurt Them: Defending Employment-at-Will in Light of Findings That Employees Believe They Possess Just Cause Protection’. Berkeley Journal of Employment & Labor Law 23: 307.Google Scholar
Saltstone, Scot P., Saltstone, Robert and Rowe, Brian H.. 1997. ‘Knowledge of Medical-Legal Issues: Survey of Ontario Family Medicine Residents’. Canadian Family Physician 43: 669.Google Scholar
Sametz, L., McLoughlin, C. and Streib, V.. 1981. ‘Teacher’s Survey of Knowledge of School Law and Child Abuse’. Kent, OH. ED218243.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 1975. ‘Support for the Legal System: An Analysis of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior’. American Politics Quarterly 3 no. 1: 324.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 1976/7. ‘Studying American Legal Culture: An Assessment of Survey Evidence’. Law & Society Review 11: 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Felstiner, William L. F.. 1989. ‘Lawyers and Legal Consciousness: Law Talk in the Divorce Lawyer’s Office’. Yale Law Journal: 1663–88.Google Scholar
Saunders, LaVell E. 1975. ‘Collective Ignorance: Public Knowledge of Family Law’. Family Coordinator:6974.Google Scholar
Saunders, LaVell E. 1981. ‘Ignorance of the Law among Teenagers: Is It a Barrier to the Exertion of Their Rights as Citizens?Adolescence 16 no. 63: 711.Google Scholar
Schimmel, David, and Militello, Matthew. 2007. ‘Legal Literacy for Teachers: A Neglected Responsibility’. Harvard Educational Review 77 no. 3: 257–84.Google Scholar
Shaw, F. W. I. 1984. ‘Principals’ Knowledge of the Law of Public Education and Its Relation to Job Satisfaction’. Dissertation, University of Utah.Google Scholar
Shen, Francis X., Hoffman, Morris B., Jones, Owen D. and Greene, Joshua D.. 2011. ‘Sorting Guilty Minds’. New York University Law Review 86: 1306.Google Scholar
Shuman, Daniel W., and Weiner, Myron S.. 1981. ‘Privilege Study: An Empirical Examination of the Psychotherapist–Patient Privilege’. North Carolina Law Review 60: 893.Google Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin A. 2009. ‘The Privatization of Public Legal Rights: How Manufacturers Construct the Meaning of Consumer Law’. Law & Society Review 43 no. 3: 527–62.Google Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin A. 2015. ‘Rule‐Intermediaries in Action: How State and Business Stakeholders Influence the Meaning of Consumer Rights in Regulatory Governance Arrangements’. Law & Policy 37 nos. 1–2: 131.Google Scholar
Talesh, Shauhin, and Pélisse, Jérôme. 2019. ‘How Legal Intermediaries Facilitate or Inhibit Social Change’. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 79: 111–45.Google Scholar
Thornton, Dorothy, Gunningham, Neil and Kagan, Robert A.. 2005. ‘General Deterrence and Corporate Environmental Behavior’. Law & Policy 27 no. 2: 262–88.Google Scholar
Van McCrary, S., and Swanson, Jeffrey W.. 1999. ‘Physicians’ Legal Defensiveness and Knowledge of Medical Law: Comparing Denmark and the USA’. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 27 no. 1: 1821.Google Scholar
Van McCrary, S., Swanson, Jeffrey W., Perkins, Henry S. and Winslade, William J.. 1992. ‘Treatment Decisions for Terminally Ill Patients: Physicians’ Legal Defensiveness and Knowledge of Medical Law’. Law, Medicine and Health Care 20 no. 4: 364–76.Google Scholar
White, Ben, Willmott, Lindy, Cartwright, Colleen, Parker, Malcolm H. and Williams, Gail. 2014. ‘Doctors’ Knowledge of the Law on Withholding and Withdrawing Life‐Sustaining Medical Treatment’. Medical Journal of Australia 201 no. 4: 229–32.Google Scholar
White, Ben, Willmott, Lindy, Parker, Malcolm, Cartwright, Colleen and Williams, Gail. 2012. ‘What Do Emergency Physicians Think of Law?Emergency Medicine Australasia 24 no. 4: 355–6.Google Scholar
Williams, Martha, and Hall, Jay. 1972. ‘Knowledge of the Law in Texas: Socioeconomic and Ethnic Differences’. Law & Society Review 7 no. 1: 99118.Google Scholar
Winter, S., and May, P. J.. 2001. ‘Motivation for Compliance with Environmental Regulations’. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 no. 4: 675–98.Google Scholar
Zirkel, Perry A. 1996. ‘The Law or the Lore?Phi Delta Kappan 77 no. 8: 579.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×