Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:11:57.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Memory and Aging in Social Contexts

from Part III - Aging in a Socioemotional Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2020

By
Michelle L. Meade ,
Vladimir A. Perga  and
Katherine M. Hart
Edited by
Ayanna K. Thomas  and
Angela Gutchess
Ayanna K. Thomas
Affiliation:
Tufts University, Massachusetts
Angela Gutchess
Affiliation:
Brandeis University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

Older adults often collaborate with others to recreate past events and reminisce. In the current chapter, we discuss the patterns of gains and losses associated with social memory and aging specifically as they relate to research on collaborative remembering and social contagion. Within the collaborative remembering literatures, we focus on different methods of measuring group and individual memory performance and the role of partner familiarity. Within social contagion, we focus on age differences in susceptibility to socially suggested false memories and how perceptions of age influence the effects. Across literatures, there is some disagreement on precisely how and when collaboration benefits and/or disrupts older adults’ memories. However, there is strong agreement that collaboration influences memory and that social influence is an important contextual factor on older adults’ cognition.

Keywords

collaborative memorycollaborative inhibitionsocial contagionmemory conformity
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Aging
A Life Course Perspective
 , pp. 281 - 298
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allan, K., Midjord, J. P., Martin, D., & Gabbert, F. (2012). Memory conformity and the perceived accuracy of self versus other. Memory and Cognition, 40, 280–286. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0141-9Google Scholar
Andersson, J., & Ronnberg, J. (1995). Recall suffers from collaboration: Joint effects of friendship and task complexity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350090303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, J., & Ronnberg, J. (1996). Collaboration and memory: Effects of dyadic retrieval on different memory tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199604)10:2<171::AID-ACP385>3.0.CO;2-DGoogle Scholar
Andrews, J. J., & Rapp, D. N. (2014). Partner characteristics and social contagion: Does group composition matter? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3024Google Scholar
Barber, S. J., Harris, C. B., & Rajaram, S. (2015). Why two heads apart are better than two heads together: Multiple mechanisms underlie the collaborative inhibition effect in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 559–566. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000037Google Scholar
Barnier, A. J., Harris, C. B., & Congleton, A. R. (2013). Mind the gap: Generations of questions in the early science of collaborative recall. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 124–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.05.002Google Scholar
Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., & Thomas, R. L., III. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1176–1189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1176Google Scholar
Blumen, H. M. (2018). Collaborative memory interventions for age-related and Alzheimer’s disease-related memory decline. In Meade, M. L., Harris, C. B., Van Bergen, P., Sutton, J., & Barnier, A. J. (Eds.), Collaborative remembering: Theories, research, and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blumen, H. M., & Rajaram, S. (2008). Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall. Memory, 16, 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701804495Google Scholar
Blumen, H. M., Rajaram, S., & Henkel, L. (2013). The applied value of collaborative memory research in aging: Behavioral and neural considerations. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.03.003Google Scholar
Blumen, H. M., & Stern, Y. (2011). Short-term and long-term collaboration benefits on individual recall in young and older adults. Memory and Cognition, 39, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0023-6Google Scholar
Craik, F. I. M., & McDowd, J. M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 474–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.474Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, O., Danielson, H., Andersson, J., & Ronnberg, J. (2013). The applied value of collaborative memory research in aging – some critical comments. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 122–123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.05.003Google Scholar
Davis, S. D., & Meade, M. L. (2013). Both young and older adults discount suggestions from older adults on a social memory test. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20, 760–765. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0392-5Google Scholar
Dixon, R. A. (1996). Collaborative memory and aging. In Hermann, D., McEvoy, C., Hertzog, C., & Johnson, M. K. (Eds.), Basic and applied memory research: Theory in context. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. A. (1999). Exploring cognition in interactive situations: The aging of N + 1 minds. In Hess, T. M. & Blanchard-Fields, F. (Eds.), Social cognition and aging. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. A. (2013). Collaborative memory research in aging: Supplemental perspectives on application. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 128–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.05.001Google Scholar
Dixon, R. A., Gagnon, L. M., & Crow, C. B. (1998). Collaborative memory accuracy and distortion: Performance and beliefs. In Intons-Peterson, M. J. & Best, D. L. (Eds.), Memory distortions and their prevention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. A., & Gould, O. N. (1998). Younger and older adults collaborating on retelling everyday stories. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0203_4Google Scholar
Echterhoff, G., Hirst, W., & Hussy, W. (2005). How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: Social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristic. Memory and Cognition, 33, 770–782. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193073Google Scholar
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.885Google Scholar
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., Allan, K., & Wright, D. B. (2004). Say it to my face: Examining the effects of socially encountered misinformation. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1348/1355325041719428Google Scholar
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (2007). I saw it for longer than you: The relationship between perceived encoding duration and memory conformity. Acta Psychologica, 124, 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.009Google Scholar
Gabbert, F., & Wheeler, R. (2018). Memory conformity following collaborative remembering. In Meade, M. L., Harris, C. B., Van Bergen, P., Sutton, J., & Barnier, A. J. (Eds.), Collaborative remembering: Theories, research, and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gagnon, L. M., & Dixon, R. A. (2008). Remembering and retelling stories in individual and collaborative contexts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 1275–1297. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1437CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, O. N., & Dixon, R. A. (1993). How we spent our vacation: Collaborative storytelling by young and old adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 10–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.8.1.10Google Scholar
Gould, O., Kurzman, D., & Dixon, R. A. (1994). Communication during prose recall conversations by young and old dyads. Discourse Processes, 17, 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544863Google Scholar
Gould, O. N., Osborn, C., Krein, H., & Moretenson, M. (2002). Collaborative recall in married and unacquainted dyads. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250143000292Google Scholar
Gould, O. N., Trevithick, L., & Dixon, R. A. (1991). Adult age differences in elaborations produced during prose recall. Psychology and Aging, 6, 93–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.6.1.93Google Scholar
Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J., & Keil, P. (2014). Couples as socially distributed cognitive systems: Remembering in everyday social and material contexts. Memory Studies, 7, 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698014530619Google Scholar
Harris, C. B., Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J., Keil, P. G., & Dixon, R. A. (2017). “Going episodic”: Collaborative inhibition and facilitation when long-married couples remember together. Memory, 25, 1148–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1274405Google Scholar
Harris, C. B., Keil, P. G., Sutton, J., Barnier, A. J., & McIlwain, D. J. F. (2011). We remember, we forget: Collaborative remembering in older couples. Discourse Processes, 48, 267–303.Google Scholar
Harris, C. B., Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2008). Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together? Memory, 16, 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701811862Google Scholar
Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1989). Aging and source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 4, 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.4.1.106Google Scholar
Henkel, L. A., & Kris, A. (2018). Collaborative remembering and reminiscence in older adults. In Meade, M. L., Harris, C. B., Van Bergen, P., Sutton, J., & Barnier, A. J. (Eds.), Collaborative remembering: Theories, research, and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henkel, L. A., & Rajaram, S. (2011). Collaborative remembering in older adults: Age-invariant outcomes in the context of episodic recall deficits. Psychology and Aging, 26, 532–545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023106Google Scholar
Hirst, W. (2013). Commentary on: Helena M. Blumen, Suparna Rajaram, and Linda A. Henkel’s “The applied value of collaborative memory research in aging: Behavioral and neural considerations. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 118–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.04.002Google Scholar
Huff, M. J., Davis, S. D., & Meade, M. L. (2013). The effects of initial testing on false recall and false recognition in the social contagion of memory paradigm. Memory and Cognition, 41, 820–831. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0299-4Google Scholar
Jack, F., Zydervelt, S., & Zajonc, R. (2014). Are co-witnesses special? Comparing the influence of co-witness and interviewer misinformation on eyewitness reports. Memory, 22, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.778291Google Scholar
Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 3–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.3Google Scholar
Jaeger, A., Lauris, P., Selmeczy, D., & Dobbins, I. G. (2012). The costs and benefits of memory conformity. Memory and Cognition, 40, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0130-zGoogle Scholar
Johansson, O., Andersson, J., & Ronnberg, J. (2000). Do elderly couples have better prospective memory than other elderly people when they collaborate? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(200003/04)14:2<121::AID-ACP626>3.0.CO;2-AGoogle Scholar
Johansson, O., Andersson, J., & Ronnberg, J. (2005). Compensating strategies in collaborative remembering in very old couples. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00465.xGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. K., Hastroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3Google Scholar
Kwong See, S. T., Hoffman, H. G., & Wood, T. L. (2001). Perceptions of an old female eyewitness: Is the older eyewitness believable? Psychology and Aging, 16, 346–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.346Google Scholar
Levy, B. R. (1996). Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1092–1107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1092Google Scholar
Marion, S. B., & Thorley, C. (2016). A meta-analytic review of collaborative inhibition and postcollaborative memory: Testing the predictions of the retrieval strategy disruption hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1141–1164. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000071Google Scholar
McNabb, J. C., & Meade, M. L. (2014). Correcting socially introduced false memories: The effect of re-study. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3, 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.05.007Google Scholar
Meade, M. L. (2013). The importance of group process variables on collaborative memory. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 120–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.04.004Google Scholar
Meade, M. L., Harris, C. B., Van Bergen, P., Sutton, J., & Barnier, A. J. (Eds.), (2018). Collaborative remembering: Theories, research, and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meade, M. L., McNabb, J. C., Lindeman, M. I. H., & Smith, J. L. (2017). Discounting input from older adults: The role of age salience on partner age effects in the social contagion of memory. Memory, 25, 704–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1207783Google Scholar
Meade, M. L., Nokes, T. J., & Morrow, D. G. (2009). Expertise promotes facilitation on collaborative memory task. Memory, 17, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802524240Google Scholar
Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L. III. (2002). Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory and Cognition, 30, 995–1009. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194318Google Scholar
Meade, M. L., & Roediger, H. L. III (2009). Age differences in collaborative memory: The role of retrieval manipulations. Memory and Cognition, 37, 962–975. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.7.962Google Scholar
Mori, K., & Mori, H. (2008). Conformity among cowitnesses sharing same or different information about an event in experimental collaborative eyewitness testimony. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106, 275–290. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.106.1.275-290Google Scholar
Numbers, K. T., Barnier, A. J., Harris, C. B., & Meade, M. L. (2019). Aging stereotypes influence the transmission of false memories in the social contagion paradigm. Memory, 27(3), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1511809Google Scholar
Numbers, K. T., Meade, M. L., & Perga, V. (2014). The influence of partner accuracy and partner memory ability on social false memories. Memory and Cognition, 42, 1225–1238. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0443-9Google Scholar
Park, D. C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., et al. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 299–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.299Google Scholar
Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2006). Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: The power or co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1083–1099. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1261Google Scholar
Paterson, H. M., Kemp, R. I., & Forgas, J. P. (2009). Co-witnesses, confederates, and conformity: Effects of discussion and delay on eyewitness memory. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710802620380Google Scholar
Paterson, H., & Monds, L. (2018). Forensic applications of social memory research. In Meade, M. L., Harris, C. B., Van Bergen, P., Sutton, J., & Barnier, A. J. (Eds.), Collaborative remembering: Theories, research, and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rajaram, S. (2011). Collaboration both hurts and helps memory: A cognitive perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411403251Google Scholar
Rajaram, S. (2018). Collaborative inhibition in group recall: Principles and implications. In Meade, M. L., Harris, C. B., Van Bergen, P., Sutton, J., & Barnier, A. J. (Eds.), Collaborative remembering: Theories, research, and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roediger, H. L. (1996). Memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 76–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0005Google Scholar
Roediger, H. L. III, & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). Illusory recollections in older adults: Testing Mark Twain’s conjecture. In Garry, M. & Hayne, H. (Eds.), Do justice and let the sky fall: Elizabeth F. Loftus and her contributions to science, law, and academic freedom (pp. 105–136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Roediger, H. L III, Meade, M. L., & Bergman, E. T. (2001). Social contagion of memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 365–371. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196174Google Scholar
Ross, M., Spencer, S. J., Blatz, C. W., & Restorick, E. (2008). Collaboration reduces the frequency of false memories in older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 23, 85–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.85Google Scholar
Ross, M., Spencer, S. J., Linardatos, L., Lam, K. C. H., & Perunovic, M. (2004). Going shopping and identifying landmarks: Does collaboration improve older people’s memory? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1023Google Scholar
Thorley, C. (2015). Blame conformity: Innocent bystanders can be blamed for a crime as a result of misinformation from a young, but not elderly, adult co-witness. PLoS One, 10(70), e0134739. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134739Google Scholar
Thorley, C., & Dewhurst, S. A. (2007). Collaborative false recall in the DRM procedure: Effects of group size and group pressure. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 867–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440600872068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923–929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923Google Scholar
Weldon, M. S. (2001). Remembering as a social process. In Medin, D. L. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (vol. 40, pp. 67–120). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160–1175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1160Google Scholar
Wright, D. B. (2013). Commentary on Blumen, Rajaram, and Henkel. Adding “simulate” to their steps. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 131–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.04.003Google Scholar
Wright, D. B., London, K., & Waechter, M. (2010). Social anxiety moderates memory conformity in adolescents. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1034–1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1604Google Scholar
Wright, D. B., Memon, A., Skagerberg, E. M., & Gabbert, F. (2009). When eyewitnesses talk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01631.xGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. B., Self, G., & Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712600161781Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×