Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-xxrs7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T11:16:03.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Semantic Patterns from an Areal Perspective

from Part I - Issues in Areal Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2017

Raymond Hickey
Affiliation:
Universität Duisburg–Essen
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agbetsoamedo, Yvonne and Di Garbo, Francesca, 2015. Unravelling temperature terms in Sɛlɛɛ. In Koptjevskaja-Tamm, (ed.), pp. 107127.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Aleksandra Y., 2009. ‘Eating’, ‘drinking’ and ‘smoking’: A generic verb and its semantics in Manambu. In Newman, John (ed.), The Linguistics of Eating and Drinking, pp. 91108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Akhunzada, Fakhruddin and Liljegren, Maarit, 2009. Kalkatak: A Crossroads of Cultures in Chitral. FLI Language and Culture Series, vol. 4. Islamabad: Forum for Language Initiatives.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K., 2006. Grammars in contact in the Volta Basin (West Africa): On contact induced grammatical change in Likpe. In Aikhenvald, Aleksandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds), Grammars in Contact: A Cross-Linguistic Typology, pp. 114142. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K., 2011. ‘When I die don’t cry’: The ethnopragmatics of ‘gratitude’ in West African languages. In Goddard, Cliff (ed.), Ethnopragmatics: Understanding Discourse in Natural Context, pp. 231266. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K., 2015. ‘Hard sun, hot weather, skin pain’: The cultural semantics of temperature expressions in Ewe and Likpe (West Africa). In Koptjevskaja-Tamm, (ed.), pp. 4372.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. and Breedveld, Anneke, 2004. Areal cultural scripts for social interaction in West African communities. Intercultural Pragmatics 1 (2): 167187.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. and Wilkins, David P., 1996. Semantics. In Goebl, Hans, Nelde, Peter H., Starý, Zdeněk and Wölck, Wolfgang (eds), Contact Linguistics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, pp. 130138. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Austin, Peter, Ellis, Robert and Hercus, Luise, 1976. ‘Fruit of the eyes’: Semantic diffusion in the Lakes languages of South Australia. Papers in Australian Linguistics 10: 5177.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, 1998. Phasal adverbials. In van der Auwera, Johan (ed.) with Ó Baoill, Dónall P., Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, pp. 25145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, 2011. Standard Average European. In Kortmann, Bernd and van der Auwera, Johan (eds), The Languages and Linguistics of Europe: A Comprehensive Guide, pp. 291306. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Baart, Joan L. G., 1999. A Sketch of Kalam Kohistani Grammar. Studies in Languages of Northern Pakistan, vol. 5. Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Baart, Joan L. G., 2003. Tonal features in languages of Northern Pakistan. In Baart, Joan L. G. and Sindhi, Ghulam Hyder (eds), Pakistani Languages and Society: Problems and Prospects, pp. 132144. Islamabad and High Wycombe: National Institute of Pakistan Studies, Quaid-i-Azam University and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bashir, Elena, 1996. The areal position of Khowar: South Asian and other affinities. In Bashir, Elena and Israr-ud-Din, (eds), Proceedings of the Second International Hindukush Cultural Conference, pp. 167179. Hindukush and Karakoram Studies, vol. 1. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bashir, Elena, 2003. Dardic. In Cardona, George and Jain, Danesh (eds), The Indo-Aryan Languages, pp. 818894. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bashir, Elena, 2009. Wakhi. In Windfuhr, Gernot (ed.), The Iranian Languages, pp. 825862. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berger, Hermann, 1998. Die Burushaski-Sprache von Hunza und Nager, vol. 1: Grammatik. Neuindische Studien, vol. 13. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar and Nichols, Johanna, 2006. Oceania, the Pacific Rim, and the theory of linguistic areas. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 32: 315.Google Scholar
Bielmeier, Roland, 1985. Das Märchen vom Prinzen Čobzaṅ: Eine tibetische Erzählung aus Baltistan: Text, Übersetzung, Grammatik und Westtibetisch vergleichendes Glossar. Beiträge zur Tibetischen Erzählforschung, vol. 6. Sankt Augustin: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert, 2011. ‘Eye of the day’: A response to Urban (2010). Oceanic Linguistics 50 (2): 524535.Google Scholar
Boyeldieu, Pascal, 2008. From semantic change to polysemy: The cases of ‘meat/animal’ and ‘drink’. In Vanhove, (ed.), pp. 303315.Google Scholar
Brown, Cecil, 2011. The role of Nahuatl in the formation of Mesoamerica as a linguistic area. Language Dynamics and Change 1: 171204.Google Scholar
Cacopardo, Alberto M. and Cacopardo, Augusto S., 2001. Gates of Peristan: History, Religion and Society in the Hindu Kush. Reports and Memoirs, vol. 5. Rome: IsIAO.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, 2013. Numeral bases. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/131Google Scholar
Croft, William, 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Edelberg, Lennart and Jones, Schuyler, 1979. Nuristan. Graz: Akadem. Druck- u. Verlagsanst.Google Scholar
Edelman, Dzhoi Iosifovna, 1980. K substratnomu naslediju Central’no-Asiatskogo jazykogo sojuza [Towards the substrate heritage of the Central Asian Sprachbund]. Voprosy Jazykoznanija 5: 2132.Google Scholar
Edelman, Dzhoi Iosifovna, 1983. The Dardic and Nuristani Languages, translated from Russian by Tsipan, E. H.. Moscow: Nauka, Central Department of Oriental Literature.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J. (ed.), 2003. Linguistic Epidemiology: Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J., 2011. Taste in two tongues: A Southeast Asian study of semantic convergence. In Majid, Asifa and Levinson, Stephen C. (eds), The Senses in Language and Culture, pp. 3037. Special issue of The Senses and Society 6 (1).Google Scholar
Epps, Patience, 2013. Inheritance, calquing or independent innovation? Reconstructing morphological complexity in Amazonian numerals. Journal of Language Contact 6: 329357.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, 1992. Multiple semiotic systems, hyperpolysemy, and the reconstruction of semantic change in Australian languages. In Austin, Peter, Dixon, R. M. W., Dutton, Tom and White, Isobel (eds), Language and History: Essays in Honour of Luise A. Hercus, pp. 137155. Pacific Linguistics, vol. C-116. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas and Wilkins, David P., 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76: 546592.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre, 2008. Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemous networks across languages. In Vanhove, (ed.), pp. 163215.Google Scholar
François, Alexandre, 2010. Des valeurs en héritage: Les isomorphismes sémantiques et la reconstruction des langues. In Choi-Jonin, Injoo, Duval, Marc and Soutet, Olivier (eds), Typologie et comparatisme, pp. 129145. Orbis-Supplementa, vol. 29. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Gast, Volker and van der Auwera, Johan, 2012. What is contact-induced grammaticalization? Evidence from Mayan and Mixe-Zoquean languages. In Wiemer, Björn, Wälchli, Bernhard and Hansen, Björn (eds), Grammatical Replication and Borrowability in Language Contact, pp. 381426. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gil, David, 2015. The Mekong-Mamberamo linguistic area. In Enfield, Nicholas and Comrie, Bernard (eds), The Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The State of the Art, pp. 266355. Pacific Linguistics, vol. 649. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin and Tadmor, Uri (eds), 2009. Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hayward, Richard J., 1991. A propos patterns of lexicalization in the Ethiopian language area. In Mendel, Daniela and Claudi, Ulrike (eds), Ägypten im afro-orientalischen Kontext, pp. 139156. Special issue of Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere. Köln: Institute of African Studies.Google Scholar
Hayward, Richard J., 2000. Is there a metric for convergence? In Renfrew, Colin, McMahon, April and Trask, R. L. (eds), Time Depth in Historical Linguistics, pp. 621640. Papers in the Prehistory of Languages, vol. 2. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania, 2003. On contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27 (3): 529572.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Kuteva, Tania, 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Leyew, Zelealem, 2008. Is Africa a linguistic area? In Heine, Bernd and Nurse, Derek (eds), A Linguistic Geography of Africa, pp. 1535. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, 2011. Linguistic typology and language contact. In Song, Jae Jung (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, pp. 568590. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (ed.), 2015. The Linguistics of Temperature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Divjak, Dagmar and Rakhilina, Ekaterina V., 2010. Aquamotion verbs in Slavic and Germanic: A case study in lexical typology. In Hasko, Victoria and Perelmutter, Renee (eds), New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion, pp. 315341. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Rakhilina, Ekaterina V. and Vanhove, Martine, 2015. The semantics of lexical typology. In Riemer, Nick (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, pp. 434454. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koul, Omkar N., 2003. Kashmiri. In Cardona, George and Jain, Danesh (eds), The Indo-Aryan Languages, pp. 895952. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
List, Johann-Mattis, Mayer, Thomas, Terhalle, Anselm and Urban, Matthias, 2014. Database of Cross-Linguistic Colexifications, Version 1.0. Marburg: Forschungszentrum Deutscher Sprachatlas. http://CLICS.lingpy.orgGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Gullberg, Marianne, van Staden, Miriam and Bowerman, Melissa, 2007. How similar are semantic categories in closely related languages? A comparison of cutting and breaking in four Germanic languages. In Majid, Asifa and Bowerman, Melissa (eds), Cutting and Breaking Events: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, pp. 179194. Special issue of Cognitive Linguistics 18 (2).Google Scholar
Markan, LaRaw, 1979. A dictionary of modern Jinghpaw. Unpublished manuscript, quoted in Matisoff (2004).Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A., 1978. Variational Semantics in Tibeto-Burman: The ‘Organic’ Approach to Linguistic Comparison. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A., 2004. Areal semantics: Is there such a thing? In Saxena, Anju (ed.), Himalayan Languages: Past and Present, pp. 347393. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron and Sakel, Jeanette, 2007. Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence, Studies in Language 31: 829865.Google Scholar
Morgenstierne, Georg, 1942. Notes on Dameli: A Kafir-Dardic dialect of Chitral. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 12: 115198.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, 1995. The spread of language around the Pacific Rim. Evolutionary Anthropology 3: 206215.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna and Petterson, David A., 1996. The Amerind personal pronouns. Language 72: 336371.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael, 2003. Recent language contact in the Nepal Himalaya. In Bradley, David, LaPolla, Randy, Michailovsky, Boyd and Thurgood, Graham (eds), Language Variation: Papers on Variation and Change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in Honour of James A. Matisoff, pp. 6587. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pardeshi, Prashant, Hook, Peter, Masica, Colin P. et al., 2006. Toward a geotypology of EAT-expressions in the languages of Asia: Visualizing areal patterns through WALS. Gengo Kenkyu 130: 89108.Google Scholar
Parkin, Robert, 1987. Kin classification in the Karakorum. Man 22 (1): 157170.Google Scholar
Perder, Emil, 2013. A Grammatical Description of Dameli. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Piirainen, Elisabeth, 2012. Widespread Idioms in Europe and Beyond: Toward a Lexicon of Common Figurative Units. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Read, Alfred F. C., 1934. Balti Grammar. London: James G. Forlong Fund.Google Scholar
Ricca, Davide, 1993. I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm, 2007. Calquing and metatypy. Journal of Language Contact 1 (1): 116143.Google Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette, 2015. Temperature terms in Kamang and Abui, two Papuan languages of the Timor-Alor-Pantar family. In Koptjevskaja-Tamm, (ed.), pp. 860887.Google Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette, San Roque, Lila and Hendery, Rachel, 2016. Tree, firewood and fire in the languages of Sahul. In Juvonen, Päivi and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (eds), The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts, pp. 355422. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ruth Laila and Kohistani, Razwal, 2008. A Grammar of the Shina Language of Indus Kohistan. Beiträge zur Kenntnis Südasiatischer Sprachen und Literaturen, vol. 17. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Smith-Stark, Thomas C., 1994. Mesoamerican calques. In MacKay, Carolyn J. and Vásques, Verónica (eds), Investigaciones lingüísticas en Mesoamérica, pp. 1550. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Steingass, Francis Joseph, 2000. A Comprehensive Persian, English Dictionary: Including the Arabic Words and Phrases to Be Met with in Persian Literature Being Johnson and Richardson’s Persian, Arabic and English Dictionary. Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications.Google Scholar
Strand, Richard F., 2013. Richard Strand’s Nuristân Site: Lexicons of Kâmviri, Khowar, and Other Hindu-Kush Languages. http://nuristan.info/lngFrameL.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve, 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tent, Jan, 1998. The structure of deictic day-name systems. Studia Linguistica 52 (2): 112148.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, Bertil, 1999. Archaeological-linguistic correlations in the formation of retroflex typologies and correlating areal features in South Asia. In Blench, Roger (ed.), Archaeology and Language, pp. 138148. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, Bertil, 2008. Some areal phonological isoglosses in the transit zone between South and Central Asia. In Israr-ud-Din, (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Hindu Kush Cultural Conference, pp. 250262. Karachi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toporov, Vladimir Nikolayevich, 1970. About the phonological typology of Burushaski. In Jakobson, Roman and Kawamoto, Shigeo (eds), Studies in General and Oriental Linguistics Presented to Shiro Hattori on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, pp. 632647. Tokyo: TEC Corporation for Language and Educational Research.Google Scholar
Trail, Ronald L. and Cooper, Gregory R., 1999. Kalasha Dictionary with English and Urdu. Islamabad and High Wycombe: National Institute of Pakistan Studies, Quaid-i-Azam University and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Treis, Yvonne, 2010. Perception verbs and taste adjectives in Kambaata and beyond. In Storch, Anne (ed.), Perception of the Invisible: Religion, Historical Semantics and the Role of Perceptive Verbs, pp. 313346. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika, vol. 21. Köln: Köppe.Google Scholar
Sir Turner, Ralph Lilley, 1966. A Comparative Dictionary of the Indo-Aryan Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Urban, Matthias, 2009. ‘Sun’ and ‘moon’ in the Circum-Pacific language area. Anthropological Linguistics 51 (3/4): 328346.Google Scholar
Urban, Matthias, 2010. ‘Sun’ = ‘Eye of the day’: A linguistic pattern of Southeast Asia and Oceania. Oceanic Linguistics 49 (2): 568579.Google Scholar
Urban, Matthias, 2012. Analyzability and Semantic Associations in Referring Expressions: A Study in Comparative Lexicology. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Vanhove, Martine (ed.), 2008a. From Polysemy to Semantic Change: Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vanhove, Martine, 2008b. Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Vanhove, (ed.), pp. 341370.Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke, 1984. The verbs of perception: A typological study. In Butterworth, Brian, Comrie, Bernard and Dahl, Östen (eds), Explanations for Language Universals, pp. 123162. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard, 2005. Co-Compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard, 2009. Motion Events in Parallel Texts. Habilitationsschrift, Philosophisch-historische Fakultät der Universität Bern.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard, 2015. Co-compounds. In Müller, Peter O., Ohnheiser, Ingeborg, Olsen, Susan and Rainer, Franz (eds), Word Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, vol. 1, pp. 707726. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York. Reprinted 1963, The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Willson, Stephen R., 1999. Basic Burushaski Vocabulary. Islamabad and High Wycombe: National Institute of Pakistan Studies, Quaid-i-Azam University and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wohlgemuth, Jan, 2009. A Typology of Verbal Borrowings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zalizniak, Anna A., 2008. A catalogue of semantic shifts: Towards a typology of semantic derivation. In Vanhove, (ed.), pp. 217238.Google Scholar
Zalizniak, Anna A., Bulakh, Maria, Ganenkov, Dmitrij et al., 2012. The catalogue of semantic shifts as a database for lexical semantic typology. In Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria and Vanhove, Martine (eds), New Directions in Lexical Typology, pp. 633669. Special issue of Linguistics 50 (3).Google Scholar
Zemp, Marius, 2013. A Historical Grammar of the Tibetan Dialect spoken in Kargil (Purik). PhD Dissertation, University of Bern.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×