The Big Typescript: TS 213. Ed. and trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Malden, M. A. E. Aue. MA and Carlton, Vic.: Blackwell, 2003 (German–English Scholars’ Edition).Google Scholar

The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958; 2nd ed., 1960.Google Scholar

Culture and Value. Eds. von Wright, G. H., Nyman, H., and Pichler, A., trans. Winch, P.. 1st ed., 1977; 2nd ed., 1980; revised ed., with a new translation by Winch, P.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998.Google Scholar

Geheime Tagebücher 1914–1916. Ed. Baum, W.. Vienna: Turia & Kant, 1991.Google Scholar

Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 1: Preliminary Studies for Part II of the Philosophical Investigations. Eds. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, H., trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, M. A. E.. University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 2: The Inner and the Outer, 1949–1951. Eds. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, H., trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, M. A. E.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar

Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung: Kritische Edition. Eds. McGuinness, B. and Schulte, J.. Contains text of Tractatus, Prototractatus, and Notebooks; shows correspondences between Tractatus and Wittgenstein’s previous writings. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar

Notebooks, 1914–1916. Eds. von Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1961; 2nd ed., 1979.Google Scholar

On Certainty. Eds. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Paul, D.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969.Google Scholar

Philosophical Grammar. Ed. Rhees, R., trans. Kenny, A.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974.Google Scholar

Philosophical Investigations. Eds. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, R., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1953; 2nd ed., 1953; 3rd ed., 1973; 4th revised ed., eds. Hacker, P. M. S. and Schulte, J., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., Hacker, P. M. S., and Schulte, J.. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell, 2009 [German–English parallel text].Google Scholar

Philosophical Occasions, 1912–1951. Eds. Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1993. Includes short publications, lecture notes from Wittgenstein and others, and correspondence, and more.Google Scholar

Philosophical Remarks. Ed. Rhees, R., trans. Hargreaves, R. and White, R.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1964; 2nd ed., 1975.Google Scholar

Public and Private Occasions. Eds. Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A.. Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003. Includes biographical information, diary entries, lectures, discussions in the Cambridge Moral Science Club, and more.Google Scholar

Prototractatus. Eds. McGuinness, B. F., Nyberg, T., and von Wright, G. H., trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971; 2nd ed. 1996. Includes facsimile of the author’s manuscript.Google Scholar

Remarks on Colour. Ed. Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. McAlister, L. and Schättle, M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1977.Google Scholar

Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Eds. von Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1956; 2nd ed., 1967; 3rd ed., 1978.Google Scholar

Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 1. Eds. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 2. Eds. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, H., trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, M. A. E.. University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. Ogden, C. K.. London: Routledge, 1922. Trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B.. London: Routledge, 1961.Google Scholar

Vermischte Bemerkungen, Eine Auswahl aus dem Nachlass. Ed. von Wright, G. H., assisted by Nyman, H.. Revision by Pichler, A.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994.Google Scholar

Wiener Ausgabe/Vienna Edition, Introduction and Vols. 1–5, 8.1 and 11. Ed. Nedo, M.. Vienna and New York: Springer Verlag. (1993–). [This is presently incomplete. The volumes so far published contain early parts of the Nachlass, with the original paginations. In addition to an Introduction and Concordance, it is projected to comprise 15 volumes.]Google Scholar

Wörterbuch für Volksschulen. Eds. Leinfelner, W., Leinfelner, E., and Hubner, A.. Vienna: Holder–Pichler–Tempsky, 1977.Google Scholar

Zettel. Eds. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H., trans Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967; 2nd ed., 1981.Google Scholar

The Published Works of Ludwig Wittgenstein. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex, 1993. Part of the Past Masters electronic text database series.Google Scholar

The Collected Works of Ludwig Wittgenstein. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex, 1998. Part of the Past Masters electronic text database series.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein: Gesamtbriefwechsel/Complete Correspondence. Innsbruck Electronic Edition. 2nd Release. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex, 2011. Part of the Past Masters electronic text database series.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein: Letters, Lectures, Conversations, Memoirs. Electronic Edition. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex, 2001. Part of the Past Masters electronic text database series.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein’s Nachlass. Bergen Electronic Edition. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex, 2003. Part of the Past Masters electronic text database series.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein: Tagebücher und Briefe. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex, 2002. Part of the Past Masters electronic text database series.Google Scholar

The Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen website, http://wab.uib.no/, provides free access to Wittgenstein primary sources, including the Bergen Facsimile Edition (BFE) and the Bergen Nachlass Edition.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition, in Pichler, A., ed., Wittgenstein Source. Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 2015–, wittgensteinsource.org.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein Source Facsimile Edition of Moore’s Notes on Wittgenstein’s Lectures, in Pichler, A., ed., Wittgenstein Source. Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 2015, wittgensteinsource.org.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein Source Facsimile Edition of Tractatus Publication Materials, in Pichler, A., ed., Wittgenstein Source. Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 2016, wittgensteinsource.org.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein Source Prototractatus Tools, in Pichler, A., ed., Wittgenstein Source. Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 2016–, wittgensteinsource.org.Google Scholar

The University of Iowa Tractatus Map, http://tractatus.lib.uiowa.edu/.Google Scholar

“Bibliographie der deutsch- und englischsprachigen Wittgenstein-Ausgaben.” Pichler, A., Biggs, M. A. R., and Szeltner, S. A., www.ilwg.eu/files/Wittgenstein_Bibliographie.pdf.Google Scholar

Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief. Ed. Barrett, C.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1978.Google Scholar

Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein, with a Memoir. Ed. Engelmann, P.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967; New York: Horizon, 1968.Google Scholar

Letters to C. K. Ogden with Comments on the English Translation of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Ed. von Wright, G. H.. Oxford and London: Blackwell and Routledge, 1973.Google Scholar

Letters to Russell, Keynes and Moore. Eds. von Wright, G. H. and McGuinness, B. F.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974.Google Scholar

Ludwig Hänsel–Ludwig Wittgenstein: Eine Freundschaft. Ed. Somavilla, I.. Innsbruck: Brenner Studien, Vol. 14, 1994. Contains Wittgenstein’s correspondence with Hänsel.Google Scholar

Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir. Malcolm, N., with biographical sketch by von Wright, G. H.. Oxford University Press, 1986; 2nd ed. Includes Wittgenstein’s letters to Malcolm.Google Scholar

Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle: Conversations Recorded by Friedrich Waismann. Ed. McGuinness, B., trans. Schulte, J. and McGuinness, B.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979.Google Scholar

Philosophical Occasions, 1912–1951. Eds. Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1993.Google Scholar

The Voices of Wittgenstein: The Vienna Circle. Ed. Baker, G., trans. Baker, G., Mackert, M., Connolly, J., and Politis, V.. London and New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein: Conversations, 1949–1951. Bouwsma, O. K.; eds. Craft, J. L. and Hustwit, R. E.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1986.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents, 1911–1951. Ed McGuinness, B.. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 3rd ed., 2008; revised 3rd ed., 2012.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein: Lectures, Cambridge 1930–1933, From the Notes of G. E. Moore. Ed. Stern, D., Rogers, B., and Citron, G.. Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein: Sources and Perspectives. Ed. Luckhardt, C. G., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1930–1932. Ed. Lee, D.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980; Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1982.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1932–1935. Ed. Ambrose, A.. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield & Adams, 1979.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein’s Lectures on Philosophical Psychology 1946–47. Ed. Geach, P. T.. London: Harvester, 1988.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein’s Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cambridge 1939. Ed. Diamond, C.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976; University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar

The Big Typescript: TS 213. Ed. and trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Malden, M. A. E. Aue. MA and Carlton, Vic.: Blackwell, 2003 (German–English Scholars’ Edition).Google Scholar

The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958; 2nd ed., 1960.Google Scholar

Culture and Value. Eds. von Wright, G. H., Nyman, H., and Pichler, A., trans. Winch, P.. 1st ed., 1977; 2nd ed., 1980; revised ed., with a new translation by Winch, P.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1998.Google Scholar

Geheime Tagebücher 1914–1916. Ed. Baum, W.. Vienna: Turia & Kant, 1991.Google Scholar

Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 1: Preliminary Studies for Part II of the Philosophical Investigations. Eds. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, H., trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, M. A. E.. University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Last Writings on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 2: The Inner and the Outer, 1949–1951. Eds. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, H., trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, M. A. E.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar

Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung: Kritische Edition. Eds. McGuinness, B. and Schulte, J.. Contains text of Tractatus, Prototractatus, and Notebooks; shows correspondences between Tractatus and Wittgenstein’s previous writings. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar

Notebooks, 1914–1916. Eds. von Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1961; 2nd ed., 1979.Google Scholar

On Certainty. Eds. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Paul, D.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969.Google Scholar

Philosophical Grammar. Ed. Rhees, R., trans. Kenny, A.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974.Google Scholar

Philosophical Investigations. Eds. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Rhees, R., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1953; 2nd ed., 1953; 3rd ed., 1973; 4th revised ed., eds. Hacker, P. M. S. and Schulte, J., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., Hacker, P. M. S., and Schulte, J.. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell, 2009 [German–English parallel text].Google Scholar

Philosophical Occasions, 1912–1951. Eds. Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1993. Includes short publications, lecture notes from Wittgenstein and others, and correspondence, and more.Google Scholar

Philosophical Remarks. Ed. Rhees, R., trans. Hargreaves, R. and White, R.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1964; 2nd ed., 1975.Google Scholar

Public and Private Occasions. Eds. Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A.. Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, and Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003. Includes biographical information, diary entries, lectures, discussions in the Cambridge Moral Science Club, and more.Google Scholar

Prototractatus. Eds. McGuinness, B. F., Nyberg, T., and von Wright, G. H., trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971; 2nd ed. 1996. Includes facsimile of the author’s manuscript.Google Scholar

Remarks on Colour. Ed. Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. McAlister, L. and Schättle, M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1977.Google Scholar

Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Eds. von Wright, G. H., Rhees, R., and Anscombe, G. E. M., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1956; 2nd ed., 1967; 3rd ed., 1978.Google Scholar

Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 1. Eds. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. Vol. 2. Eds. von Wright, G. H. and Nyman, H., trans. Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, M. A. E.. University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trans. Ogden, C. K.. London: Routledge, 1922. Trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B.. London: Routledge, 1961.Google Scholar

Vermischte Bemerkungen, Eine Auswahl aus dem Nachlass. Ed. von Wright, G. H., assisted by Nyman, H.. Revision by Pichler, A.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994.Google Scholar

Wiener Ausgabe/Vienna Edition, Introduction and Vols. 1–5, 8.1 and 11. Ed. Nedo, M.. Vienna and New York: Springer Verlag. (1993–). [This is presently incomplete. The volumes so far published contain early parts of the Nachlass, with the original paginations. In addition to an Introduction and Concordance, it is projected to comprise 15 volumes.]Google Scholar

Wörterbuch für Volksschulen. Eds. Leinfelner, W., Leinfelner, E., and Hubner, A.. Vienna: Holder–Pichler–Tempsky, 1977.Google Scholar

Zettel. Eds. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H., trans Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967; 2nd ed., 1981.Google Scholar

The Published Works of Ludwig Wittgenstein. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex, 1993. Part of the Past Masters electronic text database series.Google Scholar

The Collected Works of Ludwig Wittgenstein. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex, 1998. Part of the Past Masters electronic text database series.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein: Gesamtbriefwechsel/Complete Correspondence. Innsbruck Electronic Edition. 2nd Release. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex, 2011. Part of the Past Masters electronic text database series.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein: Letters, Lectures, Conversations, Memoirs. Electronic Edition. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex, 2001. Part of the Past Masters electronic text database series.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein’s Nachlass. Bergen Electronic Edition. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex, 2003. Part of the Past Masters electronic text database series.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein: Tagebücher und Briefe. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex, 2002. Part of the Past Masters electronic text database series.Google Scholar

The Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen website, http://wab.uib.no/, provides free access to Wittgenstein primary sources, including the Bergen Facsimile Edition (BFE) and the Bergen Nachlass Edition.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition, in Pichler, A., ed., Wittgenstein Source. Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 2015–, wittgensteinsource.org.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein Source Facsimile Edition of Moore’s Notes on Wittgenstein’s Lectures, in Pichler, A., ed., Wittgenstein Source. Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 2015, wittgensteinsource.org.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein Source Facsimile Edition of Tractatus Publication Materials, in Pichler, A., ed., Wittgenstein Source. Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 2016, wittgensteinsource.org.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein Source Prototractatus Tools, in Pichler, A., ed., Wittgenstein Source. Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 2016–, wittgensteinsource.org.Google Scholar

The University of Iowa Tractatus Map, http://tractatus.lib.uiowa.edu/.Google Scholar

“Bibliographie der deutsch- und englischsprachigen Wittgenstein-Ausgaben.” Pichler, A., Biggs, M. A. R., and Szeltner, S. A., www.ilwg.eu/files/Wittgenstein_Bibliographie.pdf.Google Scholar

Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief. Ed. Barrett, C.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1978.Google Scholar

Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein, with a Memoir. Ed. Engelmann, P.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967; New York: Horizon, 1968.Google Scholar

Letters to C. K. Ogden with Comments on the English Translation of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Ed. von Wright, G. H.. Oxford and London: Blackwell and Routledge, 1973.Google Scholar

Letters to Russell, Keynes and Moore. Eds. von Wright, G. H. and McGuinness, B. F.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974.Google Scholar

Ludwig Hänsel–Ludwig Wittgenstein: Eine Freundschaft. Ed. Somavilla, I.. Innsbruck: Brenner Studien, Vol. 14, 1994. Contains Wittgenstein’s correspondence with Hänsel.Google Scholar

Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir. Malcolm, N., with biographical sketch by von Wright, G. H.. Oxford University Press, 1986; 2nd ed. Includes Wittgenstein’s letters to Malcolm.Google Scholar

Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle: Conversations Recorded by Friedrich Waismann. Ed. McGuinness, B., trans. Schulte, J. and McGuinness, B.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979.Google Scholar

Philosophical Occasions, 1912–1951. Eds. Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1993.Google Scholar

The Voices of Wittgenstein: The Vienna Circle. Ed. Baker, G., trans. Baker, G., Mackert, M., Connolly, J., and Politis, V.. London and New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein: Conversations, 1949–1951. Bouwsma, O. K.; eds. Craft, J. L. and Hustwit, R. E.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1986.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents, 1911–1951. Ed McGuinness, B.. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 3rd ed., 2008; revised 3rd ed., 2012.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein: Lectures, Cambridge 1930–1933, From the Notes of G. E. Moore. Ed. Stern, D., Rogers, B., and Citron, G.. Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein: Sources and Perspectives. Ed. Luckhardt, C. G., Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1930–1932. Ed. Lee, D.. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980; Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1982.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1932–1935. Ed. Ambrose, A.. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield & Adams, 1979.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein’s Lectures on Philosophical Psychology 1946–47. Ed. Geach, P. T.. London: Harvester, 1988.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein’s Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cambridge 1939. Ed. Diamond, C.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976; University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Addis, M. Wittgenstein: Making Sense of Other Minds. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999.Google Scholar

Ahmed, A., ed. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albritton, R. “On Wittgenstein’s Use of the Term ‘Criterion’.” Journal of Philosophy 56 (1959), 845–57. Reprinted in Pitcher, G., ed., Wittgenstein: The Philosophical Investigations. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1968, 231–50.Google Scholar

Allen, R. and Turvey, M., eds. Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts. London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Ammereller, E. and Fischer, E., eds. Wittgenstein at Work: Method in the Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. “On the Form of Wittgenstein’s Writing,” in Klibansky, R., ed., Contemporary Philosophy: A Survey, Vol. 3. Florence: La Nuova Italia, 1969, 373–8.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. 3rd ed. London: Hutchinson, 1971.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. “The Question of Linguistic Idealism,” in Anscombe, G. E. M., From Parmenides to Wittgenstein. Vol. 1 of Collected Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981, 112–33.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. “The Reality of the Past,” in Anscombe, G. E. M., Metaphysics and Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981, 103–19.Google Scholar

Arrington, R. L. and Addis, M., eds. Wittgenstein and Philosophy of Religion. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar

Arrington, R. L. and Glock, H.-J., eds. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: Text and Context. London: Routledge, 1991.Google Scholar

Baker, G. P. Wittgenstein, Frege and the Vienna Circle. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar

Baker, G. P. Wittgenstein’s Method: Neglected Aspects. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar

Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S.. Scepticism, Rules, and Language. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar

Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S.. An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, Vol. 1, Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning. 2 Parts. Revised 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005, extensively revised by Hacker.Google Scholar

Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S.. An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, Vol. 2, Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar, and Necessity. Revised 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell, 2009, extensively revised by Hacker.Google Scholar

Bambrough, R. “Universals and Family Resemblances.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 61 (1960–1961), 207–22.Google Scholar

Bartley, W. W. Wittgenstein. Philadelphia and New York: Lippencott, 1973; revised 2nd ed., with response to critics. LaSalle, IL: Open Court, 1985.Google Scholar

Baz, A. When Words are Called For. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bazzocchi, L. “A Better Appraisal of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Manuscript,” Philosophical Investigations 38.4 (2015), 333–59.Google Scholar

Bazzocchi, L. ed. The Tractatus According to Its Own Form. Raleigh, NC: Lulu, 2014.Google Scholar

Beaney, M., ed. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Early Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Bearn, G. C. F. Waking to Wonder: Wittgenstein’s Existential Investigations. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Biesenbach, H. Anspielungen und Zitate im Werk Ludwig Wittgensteins. Sofia University Press. 2nd enlarged ed., 2014.Google Scholar

Biletzki, A. (Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein. Dordrecht and London: Kluwer, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biletzki, A. “Ludwig Wittgenstein: Middle Works.” Oxford Bibliographies Online. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Biletzki, A. and Matar, A.. “Ludwig Wittgenstein.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2014 ed., Edward N. Zalta, ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/wittgenstein/.Google Scholar

Black, M. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. Spreading the Word. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. “The Individual Strikes Back.” Synthese 58.3 (1984), 281–301.Google Scholar

Blackburn, S. “Wittgenstein, Wright, Rorty and Minimalism.” Mind 107.425 (1998), 157–81.Google Scholar

Block, I., ed. Perspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981.Google Scholar

Bloor, D. “Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the Sociology of Mathematics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4.2 (1973), 173–91.Google Scholar

Bloor, D. Wittgenstein: A Social Theory of Knowledge. London: Macmillan, 1983.Google Scholar

Bloor, D. Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions. London: Routledge 1997.Google Scholar

Bloor, D. “Wittgenstein’s Behaviourism,” in Donahue, W. O. and Kitchener, R., eds., Handbook of Behaviourism. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Bloor, D. “Wittgenstein as a Conservative Thinker,” in Kusch, M., ed., The Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge. Dordrecht and Boston, MA: Kluwer, 2000, 1–14.Google Scholar

Boghossian, P. “The Rule-Following Considerations.” Mind 98 (1989), 507–49.Google Scholar

Boncompagni, A. Wittgenstein and Pragmatism: On Certainty in the Light of Peirce and James. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouveresse, J. Wittgenstein Reads Freud: The Myth of the Unconscious. Trans. Cosman, C.. Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bouwsma, O. K. “The Blue Book.” Journal of Philosophy 58 (1961), 141–62.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Braver, L. Groundless Grounds: A Study of Wittgenstein and Heidegger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bridges, J. “Rule-Following Skepticism, Properly So Called,” in Conant, J. and Kern, A., eds., Varieties of Skepticism: Essays after Kant, Wittgenstein, and Cavell. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2014, 249–88.Google Scholar

Budd, M. Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology. London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar

Cahill, K. The Fate of Wonder: Wittgenstein’s Critique of Metaphysics and Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Candlish, S. and Wrisley, G.. “Private Language.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall 2014 ed., Edward N. Zalta, ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/private-language/.Google Scholar

Canfield, J. V. “The Community View.” Philosophical Review 105 (1996), 469–88Google Scholar

Canfield, J. V., ed. The Philosophy of Wittgenstein. New York: Garland, 1986.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. The Metaphysics of the Tractatus. Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. In Quest of the Ordinary: Lines of Skepticism and Romanticism. University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. “The Argument of the Ordinary: Scenes of Instruction in Wittgenstein and Kripke,” in Cavell, S., Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism. University of Chicago Press, 1990, 64–100.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. Philosophical Passages: Wittgenstein, Emerson, Austin, Derrida. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays. Cambridge University Press. 1st ed., 1969; updated ed., 2002.Google Scholar

Cerbone, D. “Don’t Look But Think: Imaginary Scenarios in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy.” Inquiry 37 (1994), 159–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Child, W. Wittgenstein. New York and London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Christensen, A.-M. “Wittgenstein and Ethics,” in Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press, 2011, 796–817.Google Scholar

Cioffi, F. Wittgenstein on Freud and Frazer. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Coates, J. The Claims of Common Sense: Moore, Wittgenstein, Keynes and the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Coliva, A. Moore and Wittgenstein: Scepticism, Certainty and Common Sense. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coliva, A. and Moyal-Sharrock, D.. “Ludwig Wittgenstein: Later Works.” Oxford Bibliographies Online. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Conant, J. “The Search for Logically Alien Thought: Descartes, Kant, Frege, and the Tractatus.” Philosophical Topics 20 (1991), 115–80.Google Scholar

Conant, J. “The Method of the Tractatus,” in Reck, E., ed., From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002, 374–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conant, J. “What ‘Ethics’ in the Tractatus is Not,” in Phillips, D. Z. and von der Ruhr, M., eds., Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005, 39–88.Google Scholar

Conant, J. “Mild Mono-Wittgensteinianism,” in Crary, A., ed., Wittgenstein and the Moral Life: Essays in Honor of Cora Diamond. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007, 31–142.Google Scholar

Conant, J. “Wittgenstein’s Methods,” in Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press, 2011, 620–45.Google Scholar

Conant, J. and Diamond, C.. “On Reading the Tractatus Resolutely: Reply to Meredith Williams and Peter Sullivan,” in Kölbel, M. and Weiss, B., eds., Wittgenstein’s Lasting Significance. London: Routledge, 2004, 46–99.Google Scholar

Cook, J. “Wittgenstein on Privacy.” The Philosophical Review 74 (1965), 281–314; and in Pitcher, G., ed., Wittgenstein: The Philosophical Investigations. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1968, 286–323.Google Scholar

Cook, J. “Solipsism and Language,” in Ambrose, A. and Lazerowitz, M., eds., Ludwig Wittgenstein: Philosophy and Language. London: Allen & Unwin, 1972, 37–72.Google Scholar

Cook, J. “Human Beings,” in Winch, P., ed., Studies in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969, 117–51.Google Scholar

Cook, J. Wittgenstein’s Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Coope, C. et al. A Wittgenstein Workbook. Oxford: Blackwell, 1970.Google Scholar

Copi, I. M. and Beard, R. W., eds. Essays on Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. New York: Macmillan and London: Routledge, 1966.Google Scholar

Crary, A. and Read, R., eds. The New Wittgenstein. London and New York, Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar

Day, W. and Krebs, V. J., eds. Seeing Wittgenstein Anew: New Essays on Aspect-Perception. Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, C. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, C. “Ethics, Imagination, and the Method of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus,” in Crary, A. and Read, R., eds., The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge, 2000, 149–173.Google Scholar

Diamond, C. “What if x isn’t the number of sheep? Wittgenstein and Thought-Experiments in Ethics.” Philosophical Papers 31.3 (2002), 227–50.Google Scholar

Diamond, C. “Criss-Cross Philosophy,” in Ammereller, E. and Fischer, E., eds., Wittgenstein at Work: Method in the Philosophical Investigations. London and New York: Routledge, 2004, 201–20.Google Scholar

Diamond, C. “Logical Syntax in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” The Philosophical Quarterly 55.218 (2005), 78–89.Google Scholar

Diamond, C. “Wittgenstein on Religious Belief: The Gulfs Between Us,” in Phillips, D. Z. and von der Ruhr, M., eds., Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005, 99–137.Google Scholar

Diamond, C. “The Tractatus and the Limits of Sense,” in Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press, 2011, 620–45.Google Scholar

Diamond, C. “‘We Can’t Whistle It Either’: Legend and Reality.” European Journal of Philosophy 19.3 (2011), 335–56.Google Scholar

Diamond, C. “Reading the Tractatus with G. E. M. Anscombe,” in Beaney, M., ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2013, 870–905.Google Scholar

Dilham, I. “Universals: Bambrough on Wittgenstein.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 79 (1978–1979), 35–58.Google Scholar

Donatelli, P. “The Problem of ‘The Higher’ in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus,” in Phillips, D. Z. and von der Ruhr, M., eds., Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005, 11–38.Google Scholar

Dreben, B. and Floyd, J., “’Tautology’: How Not to Use a Word.” Synthese 87.1 (1991), 23–49.Google Scholar

Dummett, M. “Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” The Philosophical Review 68 (1959), 324–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagleton, T. Wittgenstein: The Terry Eagleton Script/The Derek Jarman Film. London: British Film Institute, 1993.Google Scholar

Edmonds, D. and Eidenow, J.. Wittgenstein’s Poker: The Story of a Ten-Minute Argument between Two Great Philosophers. New York: Ecco, 2001.Google Scholar

Edwards, J. C. Ethics without Philosophy: Wittgenstein and the Moral Life. Tampa, FL: University Press of Florida, 1985.Google Scholar

Egan, D., Reynolds, S., and Wendland, A., eds. Wittgenstein and Heidegger. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Eldridge, R. “The Normal and the Normative: Wittgenstein’s Legacy, Kripke, and Cavell.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46.4 (June 1986), 555–75.Google Scholar

Eldridge, R. Leading a Human Life: Wittgenstein, Intentionality, and Romanticism. University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Ellis, J. and Guevara, D., eds. Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engelmann, M. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Development: Phenomenology, Grammar, Method and the Anthropological View. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar

Fann, K. T. Wittgenstein’s Conception of Philosophy. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, D. H. Expression and the Inner. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

III Flowers, F. A. and Ground, I., eds., Portraits of Wittgenstein. 2 vols. 2nd ed. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.Google Scholar

Floyd, J. “Wittgenstein on 2, 2, 2 …: The Opening of Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics.” Synthese 87.1 (1991), 143–80.Google Scholar

Floyd, J. “On Saying what you Really want to Say: Wittgenstein, Gödel, and the Trisection of the Angle,” in Hintikka, J., ed., From Dedekind to Gödel: Essays on the Development of the Foundations of Mathematics. Dordrecht and Boston, MA: Kluwer, 1995, 373–425.Google Scholar

Floyd, J. “The Uncaptive Eye: Solipsism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” Boston University Studies in Philosophy and Religion 19 (1998), 79–108.Google Scholar

Floyd, J. “Prose versus Proof: Wittgenstein on Gödel, Tarski and Truth.” Philosophia Mathematica 9.3 (2001), 280–307.Google Scholar

Floyd, J. “Number and Ascriptions of Number in the Tractatus,” in Reck, E., ed., From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2002, 308–52.Google Scholar

Floyd, J. “Wittgenstein on Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics,” in Shapiro, S., ed., Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics. Oxford University Press, 2005, 75–128.Google Scholar

Floyd, J. “Recent Themes in the History of Early Analytic Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 47.2 (2009), 157–200.Google Scholar

Floyd, J. “Turing on ‘Common Sense’: Cambridge Resonances,” in Floyd, J. and Bukolich, A., eds., Philosophical Explorations of the Legacy of Alan Turing: Turing 100. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2017, 103–52.Google Scholar

Floyd, J. and Putnam, H.. “A Note on Wittgenstein’s ‘Notorious Paragraph’ about the Gödel Theorem.” The Journal of Philosophy 97.11 (2000), 624–32.Google Scholar

Floyd, J. and Shieh, S., eds. Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Fogelin, R. “Negative Elementary Propositions.” Philosophical Studies 25 (1974), 189–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fogelin, R. Wittgenstein. London: Routledge, 1976; 2nd ed., 1987.Google Scholar

Fogelin, R. “Wittgenstein and Classical Skepticism.” International Philosophical Quarterly 21 (1981), 3–15.Google Scholar

Fogelin, R. “Wittgenstein’s Operator N.” Analysis 42.3 (1982), 124–7.Google Scholar

Fogelin, R. Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Fogelin, R. Taking Wittgenstein at his Word. Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Forrester, J. “Freud in Cambridge.” Critical Quarterly 46.2 (2004), 1–26.Google Scholar

Forster, M. N. Wittgenstein on the Arbitrariness of Grammar. Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Frascolla, P. Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

Frascolla, P. “The Tractatus System of Arithmetic.” Synthese 112 (1997), 353–78.Google Scholar

Frascolla, P. Understanding Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. London: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

Frongia, G. and McGuinness, B.. Wittgenstein: A Bibliographical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar

Galison, P. “Aufbau/Bauhaus: Logical Positivism and Architectural Modernism.” Critical Inquiry 16 (1990), 709–52.Google Scholar

Garver, N. This Complicated Form of Life: Essays on Wittgenstein. LaSalle and Chicago: Open Court, 1994.Google Scholar

Geach, P. “Saying and Showing in Frege and Wittgenstein,” in Hintikka, J., ed., Essays on Wittgenstein in Honour of G. H. von Wright. Amsterdam: North- Holland, 1976, 148–64.Google Scholar

Geach, P. “Wittgenstein’s Operator N.” Analysis 41.4 (1981), 168–71.Google Scholar

Geach, P. “More on Wittgenstein’s Operator N.” Analysis 42.3 (1982), 127–8.Google Scholar

Genova, J. Wittgenstein: A Way of Seeing. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar

Gerrard, S. “Two Ways of Grounding Meaning.” Philosophical Investigations 14 (1991), 95–114.Google Scholar

Gerrard, S. “Wittgenstein’s Philosophies of Mathematics.” Synthese 87 (1991), 125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerrard, S. “One Wittgenstein?,” in Reck, E., ed., From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2002, 52–74.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. and Huemer, W., eds. The Literary Wittgenstein. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Gibson, K. “Is the Numbering System in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus a Joke?” Journal of Philosophical Research 21 (1996), 139–48.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, H. “Primitive Normativity and Skepticism about Rules.” The Journal of Philosophy 108.5 (2011), 227–54.Google Scholar

Glendinning, S. On Being with Others: Heidegger, Wittgenstein, Derrida. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. “Cambridge, Jena, or Vienna? The Roots of the Tractatus.” Ratio 5 (1992), 1–23.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. “Sense and Meaning in Frege and the Tractatus,” in Oliveri, G., ed., From the Tractatus to the Tractatus and Other Essays. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2001, 53–68.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. “The Development of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy,” in Glock, H.-J., ed., Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001, 1–25.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. “Was Wittgenstein an Analytic Philosopher?” Metaphilosophy 35 (2004), 419–44.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. “Truth in the Tractatus.” Synthese 148 (2006), 345–68.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. “Perspectives on Wittgenstein: An Intermittently Opinionated Survey,” in Kahane, G., Kanterian, E., and Kuusela, O., eds., Wittgenstein and His Interpreters: Essays in Memory of Gordon Baker. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2008, 37–65.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J., ed. Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.Google Scholar

Glock, H.-J. and Hyman, J., eds. A Companion to Wittgenstein. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley– Blackwell, 2017.Google Scholar

Goldfarb, W. “I Want You to Bring Me a Slab: Remarks on the Opening Sections of the ‘Philosophical Investigations’.” Synthese 56 (1983), 265–82.Google Scholar

Goldfarb, W. “Kripke on Wittgenstein on Rules.” Journal of Philosophy 82 (1985), 471–88.Google Scholar

Goldfarb, W. “Metaphysics and Nonsense: On Cora Diamond’s The Realistic Spirit.” Journal of Philosophical Research 22 (1997), 57–73.Google Scholar

Goldfarb, W. “Wittgenstein’s Understanding of Frege,” in Reck, E., ed., From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2002, 185–200.Google Scholar

Goldfarb, W. “Das Überwinden: Anti-Metaphysical Readings of the Tractatus,” in Read, R. and Lavery, M. A., eds., Beyond the Tractatus Wars: The New Wittgenstein Debate. London: Routledge, 2011, 6–21.Google Scholar

Goodman, R. B. Wittgenstein and William James. Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grève, S. S. and Mácha, J., eds. Wittgenstein and the Creativity of Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972; 2nd ed., 1986.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations. Vol. 3, Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. 2 Parts. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth-Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations. Vol. 4, Wittgenstein: Mind and Will. 2 Parts. Revised ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. “Was He Trying to Whistle It?,” in Crary, A. and Read, R., eds., The New Wittgenstein. London and New York: Routledge 2000, 353–88.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. “When the Whistling Had to Stop,” in Charles, D. and Child, W., eds., Wittgensteinian Themes: Essays in Honour of David Pears. Oxford University Press, 2001, 13–48.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. Wittgenstein: Connections and Controversies. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. “How the Tractatus was Meant to be Read.” The Philosophical Quarterly 65 (2015), 648–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallett, G. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hamilton, A. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Wittgenstein and On Certainty. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Harré, R. and Tissaw, M. A.. Wittgenstein and Psychology: A Practical Guide. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar

Harris, R. Language, Saussure and Wittgenstein: How to Play Games with Words. London: Routledge, 1988.Google Scholar

Hertzberg, L. “Primitive Reactions – Logic or Anthropology?,” in French, P. A., Uehling, T. E. Jr., and Wettstein, H. K., eds., Midwest Studies in Philosophy 17. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 1992, 24–39.Google Scholar

Heyes, C. , ed. The Grammar of Politics: Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Hilmy, S. S. The Later Wittgenstein: The Emergence of a New Philosophical Method. Oxford: Blackwell, 1987.Google Scholar

Hintikka, J. “An Impatient Man and His Papers.” Synthese 87 (1991), 183–201. Reprinted as Chapter 1 of J. Hintikka, Ludwig Wittgenstein: Half-Truths and One-and-a-Half Truths. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.Google Scholar

Hintikka, J. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Half-Truths and One-and-a-Half-Truths. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996.Google Scholar

Hintikka, M. B.. and Hintikka, J.. Investigating Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar

Horwich, P. Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy. Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Hrachovec, H. “Wittgenstein’s Paperwork. An Example from the “Big Typescript,” http://sammelpunkt.philo.at:8080/1315/. Enlarged version of a paper by the same name in the Papers of the 29th International Ludwig Wittgenstein-Symposium (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2006), 131–3.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. F. M. “Forms of Life in Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations.” American Philosophical Quarterly 5.4 (1968), 233–43.Google Scholar

Hutto, D. D. Wittgenstein and the End of Philosophy: Neither Theory nor Therapy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.Google Scholar

Hylton, P. “Functions, Operations, and Sense in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus,” in Tait, W. W., ed., Early Analytic Philosophy: Frege, Russell, Wittgenstein: Essays in Honor of Leonard Linsky. Chicago: Open Court, 1997, 91–106.Google Scholar

Hymers, M. Wittgenstein and the Practice of Philosophy. Peterborough, ON: Broadview, 2010.Google Scholar

Ishiguro, H. “Use and Reference of Names,” in Winch, P., ed., Studies in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969, 20–50; 2nd ed. Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Ishiguro, H. “Wittgenstein and the Theory of Types,” in Block, I., ed., Perspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981, 43–59.Google Scholar

Ishiguro, H. “The So-called Picture Theory: Language and the World in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus,” in Glock, H.-J., ed., Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001, 26–46.Google Scholar

Jacquette, D. Wittgenstein’s Thought in Transition. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Janik, A. Essays on Wittgenstein and Weininger. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1985.Google Scholar

Janik, A. and Toulmin, S. Wittgenstein’s Vienna. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1973.Google Scholar

Johnston, P. Wittgenstein and Moral Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1989/2014.Google Scholar

Johnston, P. Wittgenstein: Rethinking the Inner. London: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Jolley, K. D., ed. Wittgenstein: Key Concepts. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Kaal, H. and McKinnon, A.. Concordance to Wittgenstein’s Philosophische Untersuchungen. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1975.Google Scholar

Kahane, G., Kanterian, E., and Kuusela, O., eds. Wittgenstein and His Interpreters: Essays in Memory of Gordon Baker. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2008.Google Scholar

Kang, J. “On the Composition of the Prototractatus.” The Philosophical Quarterly 55.218 (2005), 1–20.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. “From the Big Typescript to the Philosophical Grammar.” Acta Philosophica Fennica 28 (1976), 41–53. Reprinted in A. Kenny, The Legacy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984, 24–38.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. The Legacy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar

Kenny, A. Wittgenstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973. Revised 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell, 2005.Google Scholar

Kerr, F. Theology after Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar

Kienzler, W. Wittgensteins Wende zu seiner Spätphilosophie 1930–1932: Eine historische und systematische Darstellung [Wittgenstein’s Turn to his Late Philosophy 1930–1932: A Historical and Systematic Presentation]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1997.Google Scholar

Klagge, J. C. Wittgenstein in Exile. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Klagge, J. C., ed. Wittgenstein: Biography and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Klement, K. C. “Putting Form before Function: Logical Grammar in Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein.” Philosopher’s Imprint 4.2 (2004), 1–47.Google Scholar

Klemke, E. D. Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana, IL: Illinois University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Kober, M. Gewißheit als Norm: Wittgensteins erkenntnistheoretische Untersuchungen in Über Gewißheit. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1993.Google Scholar

Kober, M. “Wittgenstein and Forms of Scepticism,” in Meggle, G. and Wessels, U., eds., Analyomen 1, Proceedings of the 1st Conference, “Perspective in Analytic Philosophy.” Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 1994, 187–97.Google Scholar

Kober, M. “On Epistemic and Moral Certainty: A Wittgensteinian Approach.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1997), 365–81.Google Scholar

Kober, M. “Wittgenstein and Religion.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (2006), 87–116.Google Scholar

Kraft, T. “How to Read the Tractatus Sequentially.” Nordic Wittgenstein Review 5.2 (2016), 91–124.Google Scholar

Kreisel, G. “Wittgenstein’s Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (1958–1959), 135–58.Google Scholar

Kremer, M. “Contextualism and Holism in the Early Wittgenstein: From Prototractatus to Tractatus.” Philosophical Topics 25.2 (1997), 87–120.Google Scholar

Kremer, M. “The Purpose of Tractarian Nonsense.” Noûs 35.1 (2001), 39–73.Google Scholar

Kremer, M. “To What Extent is Solipsism a Truth?,” in Stocker, B., ed., Post-Analytic Tractatus. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004, 59–84.Google Scholar

Kremer, M. “The Whole Meaning of a Book of Nonsense: Reading Wittgenstein’s Tractatus,” in Beaney, M., ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2013, 451–85.Google Scholar

Kripke, S. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Kusch, M. A Sceptical Guide to Meaning and Rules: Defending Kripke’s Wittgenstein. Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Kuusela, O. “From Metaphysics and Philosophical Theses to Grammar: Wittgenstein’s Turn.” Philosophical Investigations 28.2 (2005), 95–133.Google Scholar

Kuusela, O. The Struggle against Dogmatism: Wittgenstein and the Concept of Philosophy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Kuusela, O. “The Tree and the Net: Reading the Tractatus Two-Dimensionally.” Rivista di storia della filosofi (2015), 229–32.Google Scholar

Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Landini, G. Wittgenstein’s Apprenticeship with Russell. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Lear, J. “Leaving the World Alone.” The Journal of Philosophy 79 (1982), 382–403.Google Scholar

Lear, J. “The Disappearing ‘We’.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 58 (1984), 219–42.Google Scholar

Lear, J. “Transcendental Anthropology,” in Pettit, P. and McDowell, J., eds., Subject, Thought and Context. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986, 267–98.Google Scholar

Leich, C. and Holtzman, S. H., eds. Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar

Leitner, B. The Wittgenstein House. Nielsen, C. R. and O’Donovan, R., trans. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Lewis, P., ed. Wittgenstein, Aesthetics and Philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar

Lovibond, S. Realism and Imagination in Ethics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Luckhardt, C. G. “Philosophy in the ‘Big Typescript’: Philosophy as Trivial.” Synthese 87 (1991), 255–72.Google Scholar

Luckhardt, C. G., ed. Wittgenstein: Sources and Perspectives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Lugg, A. Wittgenstein’s Investigations 1–133: A Guide and Interpretation. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Maddy, P. The Logical Must: Wittgenstein on Logic. Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir. Oxford University Press, 1958; 2nd ed., 2001.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. “Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations,” in Pitcher, G., ed., Wittgenstein: The Philosophical Investigations. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1998, 65–104.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. “Wittgenstein and Idealism,” in Vesey, G., ed., Idealism Past and Present. Cambridge University Press, 1982, 249–67.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. Nothing is Hidden: Wittgenstein’s Criticism of His Early Thought. Oxford: Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. “Language Game (2),” in Phillips, D. Z. and Winch, P., eds., Wittgenstein: Attention to Particulars: Essays in Honor of Rush Rhees. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1989, 35–44.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. Wittgensteinian Themes: Essays, 1978–1989. von Wright, G. H., ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. and Winch, P.. Wittgenstein: a Religious Point of View? with postscript by Winch, P., “A Discussion of Malcolm’s Essay.” Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Marion, M. Wittgenstein, Finitism, and the Foundations of Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Matar, A. ed. Understanding Wittgenstein, Understanding Modernism. New York: Bloomsbury, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, V. “The Numbering System of the Tractatus.” Ratio 6.2 (1993), 108–20.Google Scholar

McCarthy, T. and Stidd, S. C., eds. Wittgenstein in America. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. “Wittgenstein on Following a Rule.” Synthese 58 (1984), 325–64. Reprinted in A. Miller and C. Wright, eds., Rule-Following and Meaning. Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. “How Not to Read Philosophical Investigations: Brandom’s Wittgenstein,” in McDowell, J., The Engaged Intellect: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009, 96–111.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. “Wittgensteinian ‘Quietism’,” in Perl, J. M., ed., Special Issue: Apology for Quietism: A Sotto Voce Symposium, Part 3. Common Knowledge 15.3 (2009), 365–72.Google Scholar

McGinn, C. Wittgenstein on Meaning: An Interpretation and Evaluation. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar

McGinn, M. “Between Metaphysics and Nonsense: Elucidation in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.” Philosophical Quarterly 49 (1999), 491–513.Google Scholar

McGinn, M. Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy of Logic and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar

McGinn, M. The Routledge Guidebook to Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

McGuinness, B. F. “The Mysticism of the Tractatus.” The Philosophical Review 75.3 (1966), 305–28.Google Scholar

McGuinness, B. F. “The So-called Realism of the Tractatus,” in Block, I., ed., Perspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell, 1981, 60–73.Google Scholar

McGuinness, B. F. Wittgenstein: A Life. Young Ludwig, 1889–1921. London: Duckworth, 1988.Google Scholar

McGuinness, B. F. “Wittgenstein’s Pre-Tractatus Manuscripts.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 33 (1989), 35–47. Reprinted with revisions in B. F. McGuinness, Approaches to Wittgenstein: Collected Papers. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

McGuinness, B. F., ed. Wittgenstein and His Times. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982.Google Scholar

McGuinness, B. F. and Haller, R., eds. Wittgenstein in Focus. Grazer Philosophische Studien 33/34 (1989).Google Scholar

McManus, D. The Enchantment of Words: Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

McManus, D. “Ludwig Wittgenstein: Early Works.” Oxford Bibliographies Online. Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

McManus, D., ed. Wittgenstein and Scepticism. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Medina, J. The Unity of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy: Necessity, Intelligibility, and Normativity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Miller, A. and Wright, C., eds. Rule-Following and Meaning. Montreal: McGill–Queen’s University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Minar, E. “Paradox and Privacy: On §§201–202 of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (1994), 43–74.Google Scholar

Minar, E. “Feeling at Home in Language (What Makes Reading Philosophical Investigations Possible?).” Synthese 102.3 (1995), 415–32.Google Scholar

Misak, C. Cambridge Pragmatism: From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Monk, R. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. New York: Free Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Moore, A. W. “On Saying and Showing.” Philosophy 62 (1987), 473–97.Google Scholar

Moore, A. W. Points of View. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Moore, A. W. “Ineffability and Nonsense.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 77 (2003), 169–93.Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. “Wittgenstein’s Lectures in 1930–33,” in Philosophical Papers (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1959. Reprinted in Wittgenstein, Philosophical Occasions, eds. J. Klagge and A. Nordmann. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1993, ch. 6.Google Scholar

Morris, M. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Wittgenstein and the Tractatus. London: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Mounce, H. O. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: An Introduction. University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Moyal-Sharrock, D. Understanding Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar

Moyal-Sharrock, D., ed. The Third Wittgenstein: The Post-“Investigations” Works. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar

Moyal-Sharrock, D. Perspicuous Presentations: Essays on Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar

Moyal-Sharrock, D. and Brenner, W. H., eds. Readings of Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.Google Scholar

Mühlhölzer, F. Braucht die Mathematik eine Grundlegung?: Ein Kommentar des Teils III von Wittgensteins Bemerkungen über die Grundlagen der Mathematik. [Does Mathematics Need Foundations? A Commentary on Part III of Wittgenstein’s Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics.] Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, 2010.Google Scholar

Mulhall, S. On Being in the World: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects. London: Routledge, 1990.Google Scholar

Mulhall, S. “Seeing Aspects,” in Glock, H.-J., ed., Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001, 246–67.Google Scholar

Mulhall, S. Wittgenstein’s Private Language: Grammar, Nonsense, and Imagination in Philosophical Investigations §§ 243–315. Oxford: Clarendon Press 2007.Google Scholar

Nedo, M. and Ranchetti, M., eds. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Sein Leben in Bildern und Texten. With an introduction by McGuinness, B.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1983; 2nd ed., M. Nedo, ed., Ludwig Wittgenstein: Ein Biographisches Album. Munich: C.H. Beck, 2012.Google Scholar

Nielsen, K. “Wittgensteinian Fideism.” Philosophy 42 (1967), 191–209.Google Scholar

Nielsen, K. and Phillips, D. Z.. Wittgensteinian Fideism? London: SCM Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Nielsen, K. S. The Evolution of the Private Language Argument. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar

Noë, A. “Wittgenstein, Phenomenology and What it Makes Sense to Say.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54.1 (1994), 1–42.Google Scholar

Nordmann, A. “Another New Wittgenstein: The Scientific and Engineering Background of the Tractatus.” Perspectives on Science 10.3 (2002), 356–84.Google Scholar

Nordmann, A. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Nyíri, J. C. “Wittgenstein’s Later Work in Relation to Conservatism,” in Kenny, A. and McGuinness, B. F., eds., Wittgenstein and his Times. University of Chicago Press, 1982, 44–68.Google Scholar

Nyíri, J. C. “Ludwig Wittgenstein as a Conservative Philosopher.” Continuity: A Journal of History 8 (1984), 1–23. Reprinted in S. Shanker, ed., Ludwig Wittgenstein, vol. 4, 29–59 as “Wittgenstein 1929–31: The Turning Back.”Google Scholar

Nyíri, J. C. Tradition and Individuality. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer, 1992.Google Scholar

Ostrow, M. B. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: A Dialectical Interpretation. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Pears, D. “The Relation between Wittgenstein’s Picture Theory of Propositions and Russell’s Theory of Judgment.” Philosophical Review 86 (1977), 177–96.Google Scholar

Pears, D. Ludwig Wittgenstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970; 2nd ed., 1986.Google Scholar

Pears, D. The False Prison: A Study of the Development of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987–1988.Google Scholar

Pears, D. Paradox and Platitude in Wittgenstein’s Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Philips, D. Z. “Ethics, Faith, and ‘What Can Be Said’,” in Glock, H.-J., ed., Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 2001.Google Scholar

Phillips, D. Z. and von der Ruhr, M., eds. Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.Google Scholar

Phillips, D. Z. and Winch, P., eds. Wittgenstein: Attention to Particulars: Essays in Honour of Rush Rhees. London: Macmillan, 1989.Google Scholar

Pichler, A. Untersuchungen zu Wittgensteins Nachlass. Working Papers from the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, no. 8, 1994.Google Scholar

Pichler, A. Wittgensteins Philosophische Untersuchungen: Vom Buch zum Album. Studien zur Österreichischen Philosophie 36. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2004.Google Scholar

Pichler, A. “The Interpretation of the Philosophical Investigations: Style, Therapy, Nachlass,” in Kahane, G., Kanterian, E., and Kuusela, O., eds., Wittgenstein and His Interpreters: Essays in Memory of Gordon Baker. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2008, 123–44.Google Scholar

Pichler, A. and Säätelä, S., eds. Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and his Works. Working Papers from the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, no. 17. Bergen: Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 2005. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag, 2nd ed., 2006.Google Scholar

Pilch, M. “A Missing Folio at the Beginning of Wittgenstein’s MS 104.” Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4.2 (2015), 65–97.Google Scholar

Pinsent, D. H. A Portrait of Wittgenstein as a Young Man. von Wright, G. H., ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar

Pitcher, G. The Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1964.Google Scholar

Pitcher, G. “Wittgenstein, Nonsense, and Lewis Carroll,” in Fann, K. T., ed., Wittgenstein: The Man and His Philosophy. New York: Dell Publishing, 1967, 315–36.Google Scholar

Pitcher, G., ed. Wittgenstein: The Philosophical Investigations. London: Macmillan, 1968.Google Scholar

Pitkin, H. Wittgenstein and Justice: On the Significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for Social and Political Thought. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Plant, B. “The End(s) of Philosophy: Rhetoric, Therapy and Wittgenstein’s Pyrrhonism.” Philosophical Investigations 27.3 (2004), 222–54.Google Scholar

Pleasants, N. “Nothing is Concealed: De-Centring Tacit Knowledge and Rules from Social Theory.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 26 (1996), 233–55.Google Scholar

Pleasants, N. Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory: A Critique of Giddens, Habermas and Bhaskar. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Potter, M. “The Logic of the Tractatus,” in Gabbay, D. and Woods, J., eds., Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 5: From Russell to Church. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2009, 255–304.Google Scholar

Potter, M. Wittgenstein’s Notes on Logic. Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Potter, M. “Wittgenstein’s pre-Tractatus Manuscripts: A New Appraisal,” in Sullivan, P. and Potter, M., eds., Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: History and Interpretation. Oxford University Press, 2013, 13–39.Google Scholar

Pritchard, D. “Wittgensteinian Pyrrhonism,” in Machuca, D. E., ed., Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy. Dordrecht and New York: Springer, 2011, 193–202.Google Scholar

Pritchard, D. Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing. Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Proops, I. “The New Wittgenstein: A Critique.” European Journal of Philosophy 9 (2001), 375–404.Google Scholar

Proops, I. “Wittgenstein on the Substance of the World.” European Journal of Philosophy 12 (2004), 106–26.Google Scholar

Proops, I. “Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2013 ed., Zalta, Edward N., ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/wittgenstein-atomism/.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. “Analyticity and a Prioricity: Beyond Wittgenstein and Quine,” in Putnam, H., Realism and Reason. Vol. 3 of Philosophical Papers. Cambridge University Press, 1983, 115–38.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. “Reply to Conant.” Philosophical Topics 20 (1991), 374–7.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. Renewing Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. “Essays after Wittgenstein.” Part 4 of Putnam, H., Words and Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. “On Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Supp. Vol.) 70 (1996), 243–64.Google Scholar

Ramsey, F. P. “Critical Notice of L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.” Mind 32 (1923), 465–78.Google Scholar

Read, R. and Lavery, M. A., eds. Beyond the Tractatus Wars: The New Wittgenstein Debate. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar

Reck, E. “Wittgenstein’s ‘Great Debt’ to Frege: Biographical Traces and Philosophical Themes,” in Reck, E., ed., From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2002, 3–38.Google Scholar

Reck, E., ed. From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Redpath, T. Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Student’s Memoir. London: Duckworth, 1990.Google Scholar

Rhees, R. “III. Some Developments in Wittgenstein’s View of Ethics.” The Philosophical Review 74 (1965), 17–26.Google Scholar

Rhees, R. Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse, Phillips, D. Z., ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006.Google Scholar

Ricketts, T. G. “Frege, The Tractatus, and the Logocentric Predicament.” Noûs 15 (1985), 3–15.Google Scholar

Ricketts, T. G. “Wittgenstein Against Frege and Russell,” in Reck, E., ed., From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2002, 227–51.Google Scholar

Ricketts, T. G. “Logical Segmentation and Generality in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus,” in Sullivan, P. and Potter, M., eds., Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Oxford University Press, 2013, 125–42.Google Scholar

Rodych, V. “Wittgenstein on Mathematical Meaningfulness, Decidability, and Application.” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38.2 (1997), 195–224.Google Scholar

Rodych, V. “Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2011 ed., Edward N. Zalta, ed., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/wittgenstein-mathematics/.Google Scholar

Rothhaupt, J. Farbthemen in Wittgensteins Gesamtnachlass. [Colour Themes in Wittgenstein’s Complete Writings.] Weinheim: Beltz, 1996, 327–39.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. Essays on Heidegger and Others. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Rubinstein, D. Marx and Wittgenstein: Social Praxis and Social Explanation. London: Routledge, 1981.Google Scholar

Ryle, G. “Ontological and Logical Talk in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus,” in Meyer, R., ed., Aspects of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.Google Scholar

Sass, L. The Paradoxes of Delusion: Wittgenstein, Schreber, and the Schizophrenic Mind. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

von Savigny, E. “Common Behavior of Many a Kind, Philosophical Investigations, §206,” in Arrington, R. L. and Glock, H.-J., eds., Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: Text and Context. London: Routledge, 1991, ch. 5.Google Scholar

von Savigny, E. “No Chapter ‘On Philosophy’ in Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations.” Metaphilosophy 22.4 (1991), 307–19.Google Scholar

von Savigny, E. Wittgensteins Philosophische Untersuchungen: Ein Kommentar für Leser. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. Vol. 1, 1988, Vol. 2, 1989; 2nd revised and improved ed., 1994.Google Scholar

Scheman, N. Engenderings: Constructions of Knowledge, Authority, and Privilege. New York: Routledge, 1993.Google Scholar

Scheman, N. “Individualism and the Objects of Psychology,” in Scheman, N., Discovering Reality. Dordrecht: Springer, 1983, 225–44. Reprinted in N. Scheman, Engenderings: Constructions of Knowledge, Authority, and Privilege. New York: Routledge, 1993, 36–55.Google Scholar

Scheman, N. and O’Connor, P., eds. Feminist Interpretations of Ludwig Wittgenstein. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Schönbaumsfeld, G. A Confusion of the Spheres: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on Philosophy and Religion. Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Schönbaumsfeld, G. The Illusion of Doubt. Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. “Wittgenstein and Conservatism.” Ratio 25.1 (1983), 69–80. Reprinted in S. Shanker, ed., Ludwig Wittgenstein: Critical Assessments. Vol. 4. London: Routledge, 2004, 60–9.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. Chor und Gesetz: Wittgenstein im Kontext. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1990.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. Wittgenstein: An Introduction. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. Experience and Expression: Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology. Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. “Wittgenstein’s Quietism,” in Meixner, U. and Simons, P., eds., Metaphysics in the Post-Metaphysical Age. Vienna: Öbv&hpt Verlag, 2001, 37–50.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. “Wittgenstein’s ‘Method’,” in Haller, R. and Puhl, K., eds., Wittgenstein and the Future of Philosophy: A Reassessment after 50 Years. Vienna: Öbv & hpt Verlag, 2002, 399–410.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. “What is a Work by Wittgenstein?,” in Pichler, A. and Säätelä, S., eds., Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and His Works. Working Papers from the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, no. 17. Bergen: Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 2005; 2nd ed., 2006. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag, 356–63.Google Scholar

Schulte, J. “The Pneumatic Conception of Thought.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (2006), 39–55.Google Scholar

Sedmak, C. Kalkül und Kultur: Studien zu Genesis und Geltung von Wittgensteins Sprachspielmodell. [Calculus and Culture: Studies of the Genesis and Validity of Wittgenstein’s Language-Game Model.] Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1996.Google Scholar

Shanker, S., ed. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Critical Assessments, 4 vols. London: Croom Helm, 1986. Reprinted London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Shanker, S. and Kilfoyle, D., eds. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Critical Assessments. Vols. 5–8. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar

Shanker, S. and Shanker, V. A.. A Wittgenstein Bibliography. London: Croom Helm, 1986.Google Scholar

Sinnott-Armstrong, W., ed. Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Sluga, H. “Subjectivity in the Tractatus,” Synthese 56.2 (1983), 123–39.Google Scholar

Sluga, H. “‘Whose House is That?’ Wittgenstein on the Self,” in Sluga, H. and Stern, D., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, 1996, 320–53.Google Scholar

Sluga, H. “What Has History to Do with Me? Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy.” Inquiry 41 (1998), 99–121.Google Scholar

Sluga, H. “Wittgenstein and Pyrrhonism,” in Sinnott-Armstrong, W., ed., Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Oxford University Press, 2004, 99–120.Google Scholar

Sluga, H. “Family Resemblance,” in Kober, M., ed., Deepening our Understanding of Wittgenstein. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2006, 1–22.Google Scholar

Sluga, H. Wittgenstein. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell, 2011.Google Scholar

Sluga, H. “Simple Objects: Complex Questions,” in Zalabardo, J. L., ed., Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 2012, 99–118.Google Scholar

Sluga, H. “Beyond the New Wittgenstein,” in Greif, H. and Weiss, M., eds., Ethics, Society, Politics: Proceedings of the 35th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Berlin: De Gruyter Ontos, 2013, 11–34.Google Scholar

Staten, H. Wittgenstein and Derrida: Philosophy, Language and Deconstruction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984.Google Scholar

Stenius, E. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: A Critical Exposition of Its Main Lines of Thought. Bristol: Thoemmes, 1996.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. “Models of Memory: Wittgenstein and Cognitive Science.” Philosophical Psychology 4.2 (1991), 203–18.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. “The ‘Middle Wittgenstein’: From Logical Atomism to Practical Holism.” Synthese 87.2 (1991), 203–26.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. Wittgenstein on Mind and Language. Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. “The Availability of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy,” in Sluga, H. and Stern, D., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, 1996, 442–76.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. “The Methods of the Tractatus: Beyond Positivism and Metaphysics?,” in Parrini, P., Salmon, W., and Salmon, M., eds., Logical Empiricism: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, a volume in the Pittsburgh–Konstanz Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science series. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press, 2003, 125–56.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. “The Practical Turn,” in Turner, S. P. and Roth, P., eds., The Blackwell Guidebook to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003, 185–206.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. “How Many Wittgensteins?,” in Pichler, A. and Säätelä, S., eds., Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and his Works. Working Papers from the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, no. 17. Bergen: Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 2005, 164–88; 2nd ed. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag, 2006, 205–29.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. “Wittgenstein, the Vienna Circle, and Physicalism: A Reassessment,” in Richardson, A. and Uebel, T., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. Cambridge University Press, 2007, 305–31.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. “Another Strand in the Private Language Argument,” in Ahmed, A., ed., Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: A Critical Guide. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010, 178–96.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. “The Bergen Electronic Edition of Wittgenstein’s Nachlass.” European Journal of Philosophy, 18:3 (2010), 455–67.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. “Private Language,” in Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford University Press, 2011, 333–50.Google Scholar

Stern, D. G. and Szabados, B., eds. Wittgenstein Reads Weininger: A Reassessment. Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Sterrett, S. Wittgenstein Flies a Kite: A Story of Wings and Models of the World. London: Penguin Books, Pi Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Stocker, B., ed. Post-Analytic Tractatus. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. “Critical Notice: L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations.” Mind 63 (1954), 70–99. Reprinted in P. F. Strawson, Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays. London and New York: Methuen, 1974, 133–68. Also in G. Pitcher, ed., Wittgenstein: The Philosophical Investigations. London: Macmillan, 1968 and J. V. Canfield, ed., The Philosophy of Wittgenstein. New York: Garland, 1986.Google Scholar