Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:21:18.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The poverty of (rights) jurisprudence

from Part I - All kinds of everyone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

By
Costas Douzinas
Edited by
Conor Gearty  and
Costas Douzinas
Conor Gearty
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Costas Douzinas
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

When, in 1983, I ran the first-ever human rights course in my Law School only four brave and idealistic students registered, making me almost abandon the exercise. I told these pioneers that human rights are the conscience of law, practised by a few idealistic lawyers and invoked by dissidents and rebels. How different things look today. If only thirty years ago rights were the repressed conscience of the profession, they have now become its dominant rhetoric. No law student graduates without having taken a specialist course in human rights. Human rights have crept up everywhere in the curriculum. Textbooks on human rights and contract, tort, company, crime, trade, the environment and every other part of the law’s empire appear with an alarming regularity. As friends complain, all law teaching today seems to be about human rights. The dissident pioneers have become the established majority, the repressed idealism dominant consciousness, the protest ruling ideology.

‘Sooner or later, every discussion of law in contemporary society seems to turn to the subject of rights’ opens an influential collection on rights. Liberal jurisprudence has set itself the task to explain and celebrate this amazing turnaround. ‘The discourse of rights is pervasive and popular in politics, law and morality’ a more recent textbook opens boldly. ‘There is scarcely any position, opinion, claim, criticism or aspiration relating to social or political life that is not asserted and affirmed using the term “rights”. . . It is not enough to hold that a proposal will lead to an improvement in wellbeing or a reduction in suffering, unless it can also be presented as a recognition of someone’s rights, preferably their human rights.’ According to Robert Nozick’s ode to extreme liberalism: ‘Individuals have rights and there are things no person or group may do to them (without violating their rights).’

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law , pp. 56 - 78
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, W. and Hallet, J. (eds.), Left Legalism/Left Critique (Durham, NC: Duke University Press 2002)CrossRef
Campbell, T., Rights: A Critical Introduction (London: Routledge 2006)Google Scholar
Cheah, P., Inhuman Conditions: On Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douzinas, C., The End of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart, 2000)Google Scholar
Douzinas, C. and Gearey, A., Critical Jurisprudence (Oxford: Hart 2005)Google Scholar
Douzinas, C. and Gearty, C., The Meanings of Human Rights: The Philosophy and Social Theory of Rights (Cambridge University Press 2013)Google Scholar
Gewirth, A., The Community of Rights (Oxford University Press 1996)Google Scholar
Grear, A., Redirecting Human Rights: Facing the Challenge of Corporate Legal Humanity (London: Palgrave Macmillan 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivison, D., Rights (Stocksfield: Acumen 2008)Google Scholar
Hoffman, S.-L. (ed.), Human Rights in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge University Press 2011)
Moyn, S., The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2010)Google Scholar
Sarat, A. and Kearns, T. (eds.), Legal Rights: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives (University of Michigan Press 2000)
Shapiro, I., The Evolution of Rights in Liberal Theory (Cambridge University Press 1989)Google Scholar
Sarat, A. and Kearns, T., ‘Editorial Introduction’, in Sarat, A. and Kearns, T. (eds.), Legal Rights: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives (University of Michigan Press 2000) 1Google Scholar
Campbell, T., Rights: A Critical Introduction (London: Routledge 2006) 3Google Scholar
Nozick, R., Anarchy, State, Utopia (Oxford: Blackwell 1974) 1Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth 1977) xi, 90–4Google Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press 1972);Google Scholar
The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1999)
Ignatieff, M., Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Princeton University Press 2001)Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F., ‘After Neoconservatism’, New York Times, February 19, 2006;
Douzinas, C., The End of Human Rights (Oxford, Hart 2000)Google Scholar
Moyn, S., The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2010);Google Scholar
Hoffman, S.-L. (ed.), Human Rights in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge University Press 2011);
Mazower, M., No Enchanted Place (Princeton University Press 2009)Google Scholar
The Last Utopia 216. Rawls does not mention human rights in his Theory of Justice but uses them extensively in The Law of Peoples. Gewirth uses the same arguments for rights in his Reason and Morality (University of Chicago Press 1978)
Human Rights: Essays in Justification and Application (University of Chicago Press 1982)
Griffin, J., On Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyleveld, D., The Dialectical Necessity of Morality (University of Chicago Press 1991)Google Scholar
Glendon, M. A., A World Made New (New York: Random House 2001) 77Google Scholar
Rorty, R., ‘Human Rights, Rationality and Sentimentality’, in Shute, S. and Hurley, S. (eds.), On Human Rights (New York: Basic Books 1993)Google Scholar
Douzinas, C. and Gearey, A., Critical Jurisprudence (Oxford: Hart 2005)Google Scholar
Ivison, D., Rights (Stocksfield: Acumen 2008) 30Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A., After Virtue (London: Duckworth 1989) 67Google Scholar
O’Neill, O., Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning (Cambridge University Press 1996) 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, R., History and Illusion in Politics (Cambridge University Press 2001) 146Google Scholar
Gewirth, A., The Community of Rights (Oxford University Press 1996) 111Google Scholar
Kleinig, J., ‘Human Rights, Legal Rights and Social Change’, in Kamenka, E. and Ehr-Soon Tay, A., Human Rights (New York: St Martin’s Press 1978) 46.Google Scholar
Douzinas, C., Human Rights and Empire (London: Routledge 2007)Google Scholar
Bourke, J., What it Means to be Human (London: Virago 2011)Google Scholar
Darian-Smith, E., Religion, Race, Rights (Oxford: Hart 2010)Google Scholar
Ovid, , Metamorphoses (Oxford Paperbacks 2008) VII, 20Google Scholar
Shapiro, I., The Evolution of Rights in Liberal Theory (Cambridge University Press 1986) 5Google Scholar
Domokos, J. and Taylor, D., ‘Asylum Seekers: Britain’s Shadow People’ 16 March 2009,
Losurdo, D., Hegel and the Freedom of Moderns (Durham, NC: Duke University Press 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, T., ‘Thoughts on Race Equality and Human Rights’, in King, M. and Thornhill, C., Luhmann on Law and Politics (Oxford: Hart 2006) 73Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×