Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:14:56.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The interdisciplinarity of human rights

from Part II - Interconnections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

By
Abdullahi A. An-Na’im
Edited by
Conor Gearty  and
Costas Douzinas
Conor Gearty
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Costas Douzinas
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College, University of London
Get access

Summary

The subject of this chapter is the interdisciplinarity of the study of human rights, and not of the rights themselves, like freedom of expression or right to health care, in the abstract. A study like this can apply to such matters as the subjective meaning of the right as experienced by the people who claim it and the context in which it is exercised. In my view, however, the study of all aspects of human rights should be for the purpose of informing and facilitating the practical implementation of these rights, rather than as a purely academic exercise. It would therefore follow that the interdisciplinarity of the study of human rights should be directed at guiding policies and struggles for the protection of human rights. As an approach to the study of human rights, reference to interdisciplinarity addresses such questions as what it is, what does it do, and what does it add to disciplinarity and multi-disciplinarity? In other words, the title of this chapter raises questions about the relationship among disciplinarity, multi-disciplinarity and inter-disciplinarity, that is, how are these concepts related yet different, and what each of them means for the study of human rights in ways that are conducive to effective and sustainable implementation of these norms around the world.

A primary concern with any discourse of human rights is to what extent is it, or can it be, as globally inclusive as possible because that is the nature of the subject. As I will explain later, human rights must be by definition universal, if they are to be at all, because they are supposed to be the entitlements of all human beings, equally and without distinction. In other words, the human rights project may be doomed to failure for whatever reason, but if it is to succeed at all, it must be about the universal rights of all human beings. This project has been resisted for a variety of reasons when it was first proposed in the aftermath of the Second World War, and continues to attract strong scepticism. For those like myself who do believe in the necessity and possibility of the universality of human rights, the inquiry would be about what does this belief mean and require, whether in theoretical or conceptual terms, or as a matter of political, legal and cultural practice.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law , pp. 97 - 113
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, J., Lynch, K., Cantillon, S. and Walsh, J., ‘Equality: Putting the Theory into Action’ (2006) 12 (4) Res Publica411–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, T. E. and Kushner, G. (eds.), Human Rights and Anthropology (Cambridge, MA: Cultural Survival 1988)
Glendon, M. A., ‘Interdisciplinary Approaches: Rights in Twentieth-Century Constitutions’ (1992) 59 University of Chicago Law Review519–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, O. A., ‘Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?’ (2001–2) 111 (8) Yale Law Journal1935–2042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landman, T., Protecting Human Rights: A Comparative Study (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press 2005)Google Scholar
McCamant, J. F., ‘Social Science and Human Rights’ (1998) 35 (3) International Organization531–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messer, E., ‘Anthropology and Human Rights’ (1993) 22 Annual Review of Anthropology221–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, K.-M. and Tamm, D. (eds.), Law and Literature: Interdisciplinary Methods of Reading (Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing 2010)
Slaughter, A. -M., Tulumello, A. and Wood, S., ‘International Law and International Relations Theory: A New Generation of Interdisciplinary Scholarship’ (1998) 92 American Journal of International Law367–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson Klein, J., Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice (Michigan, MN: Wayne State University Press 1990)Google Scholar
Thompson Klein, J.Humanities, Culture, and Interdisciplinarity: The Changing American Academy (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press 2005)Google Scholar
Vincent, R. J., Human Rights and International Relations (Cambridge University Press 1986)Google Scholar
Washburn, W. E., ‘Cultural Relativism, Human Rights, and the AAA’ (1987) 89 (4) American Anthropologist939–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (ed.), Human Rights, Culture and Context: Anthropological Perspectives (London: Pluto Press 1997)
(1947) 49 (4) American Anthropologist 539–43
Human Rights, Comments and Interpretations (London and New York: Allan Wingate 1947)
Vincent, A., The Politics of Human Rights (New York: Oxford University Press 2010);Google Scholar
Moyn, S., The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 2010)Google Scholar
An-Na’im, A., African Constitutionalism and the Role of Islam (University of Pennsylvania Press 2006) 27–30Google Scholar
Evans, T., Human Rights in the Global Political Economy: Critical Processes (Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner 2011) 15–16.Google Scholar
An-Na’im, A. (ed.), Human Rights in Cross-Cultural Perspectives: Quest for Consensus (University of Pennsylvania Press 1992)CrossRef
Dalke, A., Grobstein, P. and McCormack, E., ‘Theorizing Interdisciplinarity: The Evolution of New Academic and Intellectual Communities’, (date of last access 12 July 2011)
Strober, M. H., Interdisciplinary Conversations: Challenging Habits of Thought (Stanford University Press 2011) 2.Google Scholar
Soldavenko, M., ‘The Limits of Interdisciplinarity’, in Parker, J., Samantrai, R. and Romero, M. (eds.), Interdisciplinarity and Social Justice (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2010) 208.Google Scholar
Thompson Klein, J. and Newell, W. H., ‘Advancing Interdisciplinary Studies’, in Newell, W. H. (ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature (New York: College Entrance Examination Board 1998) 3.Google Scholar
Moran, J., Interdisciplinarity (New York: Routledge 2010) 15.Google Scholar
Freeman, M., Human Rights: An Interdisciplinary Approach (Cambridge: Polity 2002) 4.Google Scholar
de Feyter, K., ‘Treaty Interpretation and The Social Sciences’, in Coomans, F., Grünfeld, F. and Kaminga, M. T. (eds.), Methods of Human Rights Research (Antwerp/Oxford/Portland, OR: Intersentia 2009) 217–18.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. (2005) ‘Putting Law in Its Place: An Interdisciplinary Evaluation of National Amnesty Laws’, in Meckled-García, S. and Çali, B (eds.), The Legalization of Human Rights: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Human Rights and Human Rights Law (New York: Routledge, 2005) 52–3.Google Scholar
Merry, S., ‘Anthropology and International Law’ (2006) 35 Annual Review of Anthropology99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Feyter, K., ‘In Defence of a Multidisciplinary Approach to Human Rights’, in De Feyter, K. and Pavlakos, G. (eds.), The Tension Between Group Rights and Human Rights: A Multidisciplinary Approach (Portland, OR: Hart 2008) 13.Google Scholar
Coomans, F., Grünfeld, F. and Kaminga, M. T., Methods of Human Rights Research (Antwerp/Oxford/Portland, OR: Intersentia 2009) 12.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×