Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:16:38.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Life Cycle Analysis of Biochar

from Part I - The Interdisciplinary Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2016

By
Richard D. Bergman ,
Hongmei Gu ,
Deborah S. Page-Dumroese  and
Nathaniel M. Anderson
Edited by
Viktor J. Bruckman ,
Esin Apaydın Varol ,
Bașak B. Uzun  and
Jay Liu
Viktor J. Bruckman
Affiliation:
Austrian Academy of Sciences
Esin Apaydın Varol
Affiliation:
Anadolu University, Turkey
Bașak B. Uzun
Affiliation:
Anadolu University, Turkey
Jay Liu
Affiliation:
Pukyong National University, South Korea
Get access

Summary

Abstract

All products, including bioproducts, have an impact on the environment by consuming resources and releasing emissions during their production. Biochar, a bioproduct, has received considerable attention because of its potential to sequester carbon in soil while enhancing productivity, thus aiding sustainable supply chain development. In this chapter, the environmental impacts of producing biochar using a holistic method called life-cycle assessment (LCA) or more generally life-cycle analysis are discussed. LCA is an internationally accepted method that can calculate greenhouse gas (GHG) and other emissions for part or all of a product life cycle. The present chapter will show how LCA can assess environmental impacts of the entire supply chain associated with all steps of the biochar system, from biomass harvesting through biochar production to soil amendment, with a focus on the production stage. Exploring a biochar system from a forestry LCA perspective, a new thermochemical conversion technology developed in the United States and used to process waste woody biomass, will be described. In particular, the conversion unit’s environmental performance based on the LCA research conducted so far will be described. Although this chapter will present LCA mostly from a forestry perspective, non-forestry agricultural activities will also be discussed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Biochar
A Regional Supply Chain Approach in View of Climate Change Mitigation
 , pp. 46 - 69
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASTM (2011). ASTM D3588-98, Standard Practice for Calculating Heat Value, Compressibility Factor, and Relative Density of Gaseous Fuels, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
ASTM (2014). ASTM D1945-14, Standard Test Method for Analysis of Natural Gas by Gas Chromatography, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.Google Scholar
Bare, J. C. (2011). TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 13, pp. 687–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, R. D. and Bowe, S. A. (2011). Life-cycle inventory of manufacturing prefinished engineered wood flooring in the eastern United States with a comparison to solid strip wood flooring. Wood and Fiber Science, 43, pp. 421–441.Google Scholar
Bergman, R. D. and Bowe, S. A. (2012). Life-cycle inventory of hardwood lumber manufacturing in the southeastern United States. Wood and Fiber Science, 44, pp. 71–84.Google Scholar
Bergman, R. D., Han, H-S., Oneil, E. and Eastin, I. (2013). Life-cycle assessment of redwood decking in the United States with a comparison to three other decking materials. University of Washington. Seattle, WA. Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials.Google Scholar
Bergman, R. D. and Gu, H. (2014). Life-cycle inventory analysis of bio-products from a modular advanced biomass pyrolysis system. In: Proceedings, Society of Wood Science and Technology 57th International Convention, 23–27 June 2014. Zvolen, Slovakia, pp. 405–415.Google Scholar
Brewer, C. E., Hu, Y. Y., Schmidt-Rohr, K., Loynachan, T. E., Laird, D. A. and Brown, R. C. (2012). Extent of pyrolysis impacts on fast pyrolysis biochar properties. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 1115–1122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLuca, T. H. and Aplet, G. H. (2008). Charcoal and carbon storage in forest soils of the Rocky Mountain West. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 6, pp. 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutta, B. and Raghavan, V. (2014). A life cycle assessment of environmental and economic balance of biochar systems in Quebec. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 5, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, T. and Andrae, A. S. G. (2006). Attributional and consequential environmental assessment of the shift to lead-free solders. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11, pp. 344–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekvall, T. and Weidema, B. P. (2004). System boundaries and input data in consequential life-cycle analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9, pp. 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FPL (2004). Fuel value calculator. Techline WOE-3. Madison, WI: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. [online] Available at: www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/techline/fuel-value-calculator.pdf. [Accessed 12 March 2015].Google Scholar
Gaudreault, C., Samson, R. and Stuart, P. R. (2010). Energy decision making in a pulp and paper mill: selection of LCA system boundary. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, pp. 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaunt, J. L. and Lehmann, J. (2008). Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, pp. 4152–4158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaunt, J. L. and Cowie, A. (2009). Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology. Chapter 18. Biochar, greenhouse gas accounting, and emissions trading. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Gu, H. and Bergman, R. (2015). Life-cycle GHG emissions of electricity from syngas by pyrolyzing woody biomass. In: Proceedings, Society of Wood Science and Technology 58th International Convention, 7–12 June 2015. Jackson Hole, WY, pp. 376–389.Google Scholar
Guo, Z., Sun, C. and Grebner, D. L. (2007). Utilization of forest derived biomass for energy production in the USA: status, challenges, and public policies. International Forestry Review, 9, pp. 748–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J., Shackley, S., Sohi, S. and Brownsort, P. (2011). Prospective life cycle carbon abatement for pyrolysis biochar system in the UK. Energy Policy, 39, pp. 646–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homagain, K., Shahi, C., Luckai, N. and Sharma, M. (2014). Biochar-based bioenergy and its environmental impact in Northwestern Ontario Canada: a review. Journal of Forestry Research, 25, pp. 737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILCD (2010). ILCD System Handbook – General Guide for Life Cycle Assessment – Detailed Guidance. EUR 24708 EN. European Commission – Joint Research Centre – Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Luxembourg. International Reference Life Cycle Data System. Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Ince, P. J. (1979). How to estimate recoverable heat energy in wood or bark fuels. General Technical Report FPL–GTR–29. Madison, WI: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.Google Scholar
Ippolito, J. A., Laird, D. A. and Busscher, W. J. (2012). Environmental benefits of biochar. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 967–972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ISO (2006a). Environmental Management – Life-cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework. ISO 14040. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO (2006b). Environmental Management – Life-cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines. ISO 14044. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Kammann, C., Ratering, S., Eckhard, C. and Müller, C. (2012). Biochar and hydrochar effects on greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane) fluxes from soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 1052–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304, pp. 1623–1627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehmann, J., Gaunt, J. and Rondon, M. (2006). Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems – a review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 11, pp. 403–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lentz, R. D. and Ippolito, J. A. (2012). Biochar and manure affect calcareous soil and corn silage nutrient concentrations and uptake. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 1033–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loeffler, D. R. and Anderson, N. M. (2014). Emissions tradeoffs associated with cofiring forest biomass with coal: a case study in Colorado, USA. Applied Energy, 113, 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K. and Lal, R. (2014). Biochar application to soil for climate change mitigation by soil organic carbon sequestration. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 177, pp. 651–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKechnie, J., Colombo, S., Chen, J., Mabee, W. and Maclean, H. L. (2011). Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuel. Environmental Science & Technology, 45, pp. 789–795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NETL (2013). NETL Life Cycle Inventory Data – Unit Process: Burning Crowns in Slash Piles. US Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. Last Updated: March 2013 (version 01). [online] Available at: www.netl.doe.gov/LCA [Accessed 23 July 2015].Google Scholar
NREL (2012). Life-cycle inventory database project. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. [online] Available at: www.lcacommons.gov/nrel/search [Accessed 23 July 2015].Google Scholar
Pennington, D. W., Potting, J., Finnveden, G., et al. (2004). Life-cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. Environment International, 30, pp. 721–739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierobon, F., Ganguly, G., Anfodillo, T. and Eastin, I. L. (2014). Evaluation of environmental impacts of harvest residue-based bioenergy using radiative forcing analysis. The Forestry Chronicle, 90, pp. 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K. G., Gloy, B. A., Joseph, S., Scott, N. R. and Lehmann, J. (2010). Life cycle assessment of biochar systems: estimating the energetic, economic, and climate change potential. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, pp. 827–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sackett, T. E., Basiliko, N., Noyce, G. L., et al. (2014). Soil and greenhouse gas responses to biochar additions in a temperate hardwood forest. Bioenergy, 7, 1062–1074.Google Scholar
Spokas, K. A. and Reicosky, D. C. (2009). Impacts of sixteen different biochars on soil greenhouse gas production. Annals of Environmental Science, 3, pp. 179–93.Google Scholar
Spokas, K. A., Cantrell, K. B., Novak, D. A., et al. (2012). Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 973–989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomassen, M. A., Dalgaard, R., Heijungs, R. and de Boer, I. (2008). Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13, pp. 339–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US EPA (1995). Compilation of Air Pollutants Emission Factors. Vol. I. Stationary Point and Area Sources. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
US EPA (2015). eGRID 2012 Summary Tables. Available at: www.epa.gov/sites/production/ files/2015-10/documents/egrid2012_summarytables_0.pdf [Accessed 11 August 2016].Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Dunn, J. B., Han, J. and Wang, M. Q. (2014). Effects of co-produced biochar on life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of pyrolysis-derived renewable fuels. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 8, pp.189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Street-Perrott, F. A., Lehmann, J. and Joseph, S. (2010). Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nature Communications, 1, Article No. 56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoo, G. and Kang, H. (2012). Effects of biochar addition on greenhouse gas emissions and microbial responses in a short-term laboratory experiment. Journal of Environmental Quality, 41, pp. 1193–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×