Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 3
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
October 2021
Print publication year:
2021
Online ISBN:
9781009004510

Book description

Can we really trust the things our bodies tell us about the world? This work reveals how deeply intertwined cultural practices of art and science questioned the authority of the human body in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Focusing on Henry Fuseli, Anne-Louis Girodet and Philippe de Loutherbourg, it argues that romantic artworks participated in a widespread crisis concerning the body as a source of reliable scientific knowledge. Rarely discussed sources and new archival material illuminate how artists drew upon contemporary sciences and inverted them, undermining their founding empiricist principles. The result is an alternative history of romantic visual culture that is deeply embroiled in controversies around electricity, mesmerism, physiognomy and other popular sciences. This volume reorients conventional accounts of romanticism and some of its most important artworks, while also putting forward a new model for the kinds of questions that we can ask about them.

Reviews

‘Stephanie O’Rourke’s Art, Science, and the Body in Early Romanticism is an exemplary book … Amply illustrated with numerous color images and framed by a substantial concluding chapter, the book presents a capstone vision of how histories of art and science can be told together.’

Matthew Hunter Source: Nineteenth-Century Art World Wide

‘O’Rourke forces us not only to think anew about familiar paintings, but to reflect on how we establish relationships between art and science in other cases … an approach that has the potential to reconceptualize not just the work of individual artists, but the entire Romantic era’

Oliver Wunsch - Boston College Source: CAA Reviews

‘As her wide reading and close looking show, these artists' attempts to make the body legible hit at every juncture upon instability of the self, invisibility of the causes of action, and other sources of error and indeterminacy in scientific method and Enlightenment efforts to apply it to modern life. The results have not always been appreciated as art. To reveal them as vibrant applications of-and challenges to-the most iconoclastic science of their time is the task O'Rourke sets herself.’

Andrei Pop Source: Review 19

‘Each chapter focuses on a different scientific discourse and a different artist’s engagement with that discourse, which collectively map out a variety of historical approaches to the mind, the body, and their intersection with issues of representation … O’Rourke debuts as equal parts erudite scholar and exceptional storyteller, which is an all-too-rare gift in academic prose.’

Nina Amstutz Source: H-France Forum

‘Since the 1960s, we’ve been exiting a period in which we harbored thoughts of reason’s dominance in the human mind. Reason and vision had always been correlated, at least since the seventeenth century (call this empiricism). But what is this new landscape we are entering by which rational vision takes its place beside other modes of being - various, diverse ways of inhabiting the world? O’Rourke’s beautifully written, crisply argued book begins to ask this question.’

Kevin Chua Source: H-France Forum

‘I really enjoyed reading this book. It’s beautifully illustrated with nearly fifty images that exhibit many beautiful and strange artworks produced during the Romantic period.’

Sharon Ruston Source: The Charles Lamb Bulletin

‘Written in fluid, alert and lively prose, these elegant analyses offer captivating hypotheses, with a great deal of oratorical precaution and sometimes a restraint that does credit to the author.’

Muriel Adrien Source: H-France Forum

‘O'Rourke makes a bold proposal, which opens up a whole field of possibilities for writing the relationship between scientific and artistic practices. Indeed, the great originality of this book lies in its object of study: the visual arts and in particular the formal issues that characterize them.’

Sarah Gould Source: H-France Forum

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.