Book contents
Part I - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 December 2019
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Archaeological ScienceAn Introduction, pp. 1 - 10Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Bayley, J. and Heron, C. 1998. Archaeological science in the UK: Current trends and future prospects. Revue d’Archéométrie 22(1):137–140.Google Scholar
Britton, K. 2017. A stable relationship: Isotopes and bioarchaeology are in it for the long haul. Antiquity 91(358):853–864.Google Scholar
Brothwell, D. R. and Pollard, A. M. 2001. Archaeological science: A current perspective. In: `Brothwell, D. R. and `Pollard, A. M. (eds.) Handbook of Archaeological Sciences, pp. xvii–xx. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Killick, D. 2015. The awkward adolescence of archaeological science. Journal of Archaeological Science 56:242–247.Google Scholar
Killick, D. and Young, S. M. 1997. Archaeology and archaeometry: From casual dating to a meaningful relationship? Antiquity 71(273):518–524.Google Scholar
Marciniak, A. and Rączkowski, W. 2001. Archaeology and archaeological science: Past, present and future. Archaeologia Polona 39:5–16.Google Scholar
McGovern, P. E., Sever, T. L., Myers, J. W., Myers, E. E., Bevan, B., Miller, N. F., Bottema, S., Hongo, H., Meadow, R. H., Kuniholm, P.I., Bowman, S. G. E., Leese, M. N., Hedges, R. E. M., Matson, F. R., Freestone, I. C., Vaughan, S.J., Henderson, J., Vandiver, P. B., Tumosa, C. S., Beck, C. W., Smith, P., Child, A. M., Pollard, A. M., Thuesen, I., Sease, C., 1995. Science in Archaeology: A Review. American Journal of Archaeology 99:79–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, A. M. 2007. Analytical Chemistry in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pollard, A. M. and Bray, P. 2007. A bicycle made for two? The integration of scientific techniques into archaeological interpretation. Annual Review of Anthropology 36:245–259.Google Scholar
Pollard, A. M. and Heron, C. 2008. Archaeological Chemistry. Cambridge: RSC Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, L. E. 2015. ‘Leapin’ lizards, Mr. Science’: Old reflections on the new archaeology (and musings on anthropology, art, bioethics, and medicine). Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12(4):531–535.Google Scholar
Szpak, P., Metcalfe, J. Z. and Macdonald, R. A. 2017. Best practices for calibrating and reporting stable isotope measurements in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 13:609–616.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 1991. Science versus anti-science? Archaeological Review from Cambridge 10(1):27–36.Google Scholar
Torrence, R., Martinón-Torres, M. and Rehren, Th. 2015. Forty years and still growing: Journal of Archaeological Science looks to the future. Journal of Archaeological Science 56:1–8.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. 1988. Archaeology’s relations with the physical and biological sciences: A historical review. In: `Farquhar, R. M., `Hancock, R. G. V. and `Pavlish, L. A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th International Archaeometry Symposium. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Wood, R. 2015. From revolution to convention: The past, present and future of radiocarbon dating. Journal of Archaeological Science 56:61–72.Google Scholar