Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T02:20:08.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Populism and the Crisis of Constitutional Pluralism

from IV - Eu Responses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2022

Martin Krygier
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Adam Czarnota
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Wojciech Sadurski
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

At least for the last two decades, the idea of constitutional pluralism has been a central theme of European constitutional scholarship. Constitutional pluralism imagines the European legal space as a ‘heterarchy’, consisting of multiple autonomous and overlapping constitutional sites, each claiming ultimate authority over their respective domain and yet each respecting and accommodating the other. However, while the theory has always had its critics, especially in recent years constitutional pluralism seems to have gone from à la mode to enfant terrible. Especially with the emergence of autocratic governments in Hungary and Poland and the increased space of tension this has opened, constitutional pluralism is being increasingly decried as ‘unsustainable’, ‘inherently dangerous’, ‘prone to abuse’.1 Critics point to the ways in which illiberals and autocrats in Hungary and Poland have seized upon the idea of constitutional pluralism in order to justify non-compliance with EU law and vindicate their authoritarian constitutional projects against outside criticism. The criticism has culminated in a recently published open letter signed by 27 EU legal scholars in the aftermath of a much-discussed judgment of the German Constitutional Court, calling out what they perceive as the inherent deficiencies of constitutional pluralism and declaring that ‘national courts cannot override CJEU judgments’.2

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avbelj, M, and Komárek, J (eds), ‘Four Visions of Constitutional Pluralism – Symposium Transcript2 European Journal of Legal Studies 44Google Scholar
Bako, B, ‘The Zauberlehrling Unchained? The Recycling of the German Federal Constitutional Court’s Case Law on Identity-, Ultra Vires-, and Fundamental Rights Review in Hungary’ (2018) 78 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 864Google Scholar
Baranski, Marcin, Bastos, Filipe Brito, and Brink, Martijn van den, ‘Unquestioned supremacy still begs the question’ Verfassungsblog (29 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/unquestioned-supremacy-still-begs-the-question/Google Scholar
Bayer, L, and Wanat, Z, ‘EU Top Court’s Authority Challenged by Poland and Hungary’ POLITICO (13 May 2020) politico.eu/article/ecj-authority-challenged-by-poland-and-hungary/Google Scholar
Belavusau, Uladzislau and Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra (eds) Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History (Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Blokker, P, ‘Populism as a Constitutional Project’ (2019) 17 International Journal of Constitutional Law 536Google Scholar
Castillo-Ortiz, P, ‘The Illiberal Abuse of Constitutional Courts in Europe’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 48Google Scholar
Chancellery of the Prime Minister, ‘White Paper on the Reform of the Polish Judiciary’ (2018) premier.gov.pl/files/files/white_paper_en_full.pdfGoogle Scholar
Corrias, L, ‘Populism in a Constitutional Key: Constituent Power, Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Identity’ (2016) 12 European Constitutional Law Review 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, J B, ‘The Legacy of the Maastricht-Urteil and the Pluralist Movement’ (2008) 14 European Law Journal 389Google Scholar
Cruz, J B, ‘Legal Pluralism and Institutional Disobedience in the European Union’ in Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan (eds) Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar
Cruz, J B, ‘Another Look at Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union’ (2016) 22 European Law Journal 356Google Scholar
Drinóczi, T, and Bień-Kacała, A, ‘Illiberal Constitutionalism: The Case of Hungary and Poland’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 1140Google Scholar
Eijsbouts, W T, ‘Wir Sind Das Volk: Notes about the Notion of “The People” as Occasioned by the Lissabon-Urteil’ (2010) 6 European Constitutional Law Review 199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, F, ‘After the OMT Case: The Supremacy of EU Law as the Guarantee of the Equality of the Member States The CJEU’s OMT Decision’ (2015) 16 German Law Journal 1003Google Scholar
Gersdorf, M, ‘Speech to Mark the Occasion of the Conference Organised by the Federal Court of Germany (Bundesgerichtshof): Polish Rule of Law: Missed Opportunities?’ (19 July 2018) sn.pl/aktualnosci/SiteAssets/Lists/Wydarzenia/NewForm/Wyst%C4%85pienie%20PPSN%20w%20Karlsruhe%20-%20wersja%20ang.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gessler, T, ‘The 2016 Referendum in Hungary’ (2017) 45 East European Quarterly 85Google Scholar
Graber, M A, Levinson, S and Tushnet, M (eds) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Häberle, P, ‘Die Entwicklungsstufe Des Heutigen Verfassungsstaates - Paradigmen, Verfassungsthemen, Textstufen Und Tendenzen in Der Weltstunde Des Verfassungsstaates’ [The developmental stage of today’s constitutional state – Paradigms, themes, and tendencies in the global hour of the constitutional state] (1991) 22 Rechtstheorie 431Google Scholar
Halmai, G, ‘Abuse of Constitutional Identity: The Hungarian Constitutional Court on Interpretation of Article E) (2) of the Fundamental Law’ (2018) 43 Review of Central and East European Law 23Google Scholar
Halmai, G, ‘Populism, Authoritarianism and Constitutionalism’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 296Google Scholar
Kelemen, R D, ‘On the Unsustainability of Constitutional Pluralism: European Supremacy and the Survival of the Eurozone’ (2016) 23 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 136Google Scholar
Kelemen, R D, ‘The Dangers of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Davies, Gareth and Avbelj, Matej (eds) Research Handbook on Legal Pluralism and EU Law (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018)Google Scholar
Kelemen, R D, Eeckhout, Piet, Fabbrini, Federico, and Pech, Laurent, ‘National Courts Cannot Override CJEU Judgments: A Joint Statement in Defense of the EU Legal Order’ Verfassungsblog (26 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/national-courts-cannot-override-cjeu-judgments/Google Scholar
Kelemen, R D, and Pech, L, ‘The Uses and Abuses of Constitutional Pluralism: Undermining the Rule of Law in the Name of Constitutional Identity in Hungary and Poland’ (2019) 21 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 59Google Scholar
Koncewicz, T T, ‘On the Politics of Resentment, Mis-Memory, and Constitutional Fidelity: The Demise of the Polish Overlapping Consensus?’ in Belavusau, Uladzislau and Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra (eds) Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History (Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Könczöl, M, ‘Dealing with the Past in and around the Fundamental Law of Hungary’ in Belavusau, Uladzislau and Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra (eds) Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History (Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Kovács, K, and Tóth, G A, ‘Hungary’s Constitutional Transformation’ (2011) 7 European Constitutional Law Review 183Google Scholar
Krastev, I, ‘Is East-Central Europe Backsliding? The Strange Death of the Liberal Consensus’ (2007) 18 Journal of Democracy 56Google Scholar
Kumm, M, ‘Who Is the Final Arbiter of Constitutionality in Europe?: Three Conceptions of the Relationship between the German Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice’ (1999) 36 Common Market Law Review 351Google Scholar
Kumm, M, ‘The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict: Constitutional Supremacy in Europe before and after the Constitutional Treaty’ (2005) 11 European Law Journal 262Google Scholar
Kumm, M, ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State’ in Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Trachtman, Joel P (eds) Ruling the World?: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Kumm, M, ‘Rethinking Constitutional Authority: On the Structure and Limits of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan (eds) Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar
Landau, D, ‘Abusive Constitutionalism’ (2013) 47 UC Davis Law Review 189Google Scholar
Lawrence, J C, ‘Constitutional Pluralism’s Unspoken Normative Core’ (2019) 21 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 24Google Scholar
Lindahl, H, ‘The Purposiveness of Law: Two Concepts of Representation in the European Union’ (1998) 17 Law and Philosophy 481Google Scholar
Lindahl, H, ‘Constituent Power and Reflexive Identity: Towards an Ontology of Collective Selfhood’ in Walker, Neil and Loughlin, Martin (eds) The Paradox of Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Loughlin, M, ‘In Defence of Staatslehre’ (2009) 48 Der Staat 1Google Scholar
Loughlin, M, ‘On Constituent Power’ in Dowdle, Michael W and Wilkinson, Michael A (eds) Constitutionalism beyond Liberalism (Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Loughlin, M, and Walker, N, The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
MacCormick, N, ‘The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty Now’ (1995) 1 European Law Journal 259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N, Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
Maduro, M P, ‘Contrapunctual Law: Europe’s Constitutional Pluralism in Action’ in Walker, Neil (ed) Sovereignty in Transition (Hart, 2003)Google Scholar
Maduro, M P, ‘Three Claims of Constitutional Pluralism’ in Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan (eds) Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar
Mayer, F C, ‘Auf dem Weg zum Richterfaustrecht?’ [Towards a judicial rule of force?] Verfassungsblog (7 May 2020) verfassungsblog.de/auf-dem-weg-zum-richterfaustrecht/Google Scholar
Möllers, C, ‘We Are (Afraid of) the People: Constituent Power in German Constitutionalism’ in Loughlin, Martin and Walker, Neil (eds) The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Mudde, C, ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’ (2004) 39 Government and Opposition 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C, ‘Are Populists Friends or Foes of Constitutionalism?’ (Policy Brief, Foundation for Law, Justice, and Society, 29 October 2013) fljs.org/content/are-populists-friends-or-foes-constitutionalismGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J-W, ‘Populism and Constitutionalism’ in Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira, Taggart, Paul, Espejo, Paulina Ochoa, and Ostiguy, Pierre (eds) Oxford Handbook of Populism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Orbán, V, ‘Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Speech at the 25th Bálványos Summer Free University and Student Camp’ 2010-2015.miniszterelnok.hu/in_english_article/_prime_minister_viktor_orban_s_speech_at_the_25th_balvanyos_summer_free_university_and_student_campGoogle Scholar
Perju, V, ‘On the (De-)Fragmentation of Statehood in Europe: Reflections on Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde’s Work on European Integration’ (2018) 19 German Law Journal 403Google Scholar
Popper, K R, The Open Society and Its Enemies: New One-Volume Edition (Princeton University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Roughan, N, Authorities: Conflicts, Cooperation, and Transnational Legal Theory (Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar
Sadurski, W, Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown (Oxford University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Sajó, A, and Uitz, R, The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction to Legal Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Scheppele, K L, ‘Autocratic Legalism’ (2018) 85 University of Chicago Law Review 545Google Scholar
Scholtes, J, ‘Abusing Constitutional Identity’ [2021] German Law Journal (forthcoming) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3698001Google Scholar
Schönberger, C, ‘Identitäterä: Verfassungsidentität zwischen Widerstandsformel und Musealisierung des Grundgesetzes’ [Constitutional Identity between formula for resistance and the museification of the Basic Law] (2015) 63 Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A-M, ‘A Global Community of Courts’ (2003) 44 Harvard International Law Journal 191Google Scholar
Subotic, J, Yellow Star, Red Star: Holocaust Remembrance After Communism (Cornell University Press, 2019)Google Scholar
Tripkovic, B, The Metaethics of Constitutional Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar
Tushnet, M, and Bugarič, B, ‘Populism and Constitutionalism: An Essay on Definitions and Their Implications’ (Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 20-17, Harvard Law School, 12 June 2020) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3581660Google Scholar
Vergara, C, ‘Populism as Plebeian Politics: Inequality, Domination, and Popular Empowerment’ (2020) 28 Journal of Political Philosophy 222Google Scholar
Walker, N, ‘Flexibility Within a Metaconstitutional Frame: Reflections on the Future of Legal Authority in Europe’ in Burca, Grainne de and Scott, Joanne (eds) Constitutional Change in the EU: From Uniformity to Flexibility? (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar
Walker, N, ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 317Google Scholar
Walker, N, ‘Constitutionalism and Pluralism in Global Context’ in Avbelj, Matej and Komárek, Jan (eds) Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar
Walker, N, ‘Populism and Constitutional Tension’ (2019) 17 International Journal of Constitutional Law 515Google Scholar
Weiler, J H H, ‘In Defence of the Status Quo: Europe’s Constitutional Sonderweg’ in Wind, Marlene and Weiler, Joseph (eds) European Constitutionalism Beyond the State (Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Weiler, J H H, ‘On the Power of the Word: Europe’s Constitutional Iconography’ (2005) 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 173Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M A, ‘Constitutional Pluralism: Chronicle of a Death Foretold?’ (2017) 23 European Law Journal 213Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×