Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:15:55.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Contest behaviour in ungulates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2013

Ian C. W. Hardy
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Mark Briffa
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth
Get access

Summary

Summary

This chapter reviews our current understanding of ungulate contest behaviour. Before proceeding to the meat and bones we offer a caveat: following Yeats’ question as to whether we can separate the dancer from the dance, we recognise that no single aggressive action employed by a contestant can be considered independent of all other actions. Nevertheless, for reasons of structure and economy we have presented an overview of the competitive process by portraying contests more as parts of their sum rather than vice versa. The reader should keep this in mind when considering the various sections on display behaviour, contest structure, assessment processes and opponent choice. Many ungulates vocalise and appear to show their body and weapon size to opponents during contests, and so we begin with a review of how ungulates communicate their competitive ability prior to physical confrontation. Following this, we consider factors that might affect how ungulates structure their fights: do body size, resource availability and the level of familiarity between opponents influence contest duration? What assessment processes might be driving the willingness of a competitor to engage in a fight and how might this influence contest structure and subsequent outcome? We conclude with a review of the literature concerning what factors might be involved in mediating the decision for one individual to escalate an interaction with a particular group member to fighting.

Introduction

Ungulates comprise approximately 257 species classified broadly within two different orders, the even-toed (order Artiodactyla) and uneven-toed (order Perissodactyla) ungulates. They represent the majority of large herbivores and, with the exception of the Antarctic, are currently resident in all continental regions. The numerous and diverse members of these orders and their wide geographic distribution is reflected in a complex range of social systems that extend from monogamous pair bonds to a variety of large group polygamous breeding systems. Despite the range and complexity of ungulate societies, competition to secure or defend access to resources is a common feature.

Type
Chapter
Information
Animal Contests , pp. 304 - 320
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, F (1993) Risks of fighting in relation to age and territory holding in fallow deer. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 71, 376–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, F (1995) Functional directional asymmetry in fallow deer (Dama dama) antlers. Journal of Zoology, London, 236, 563–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, M (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Appleby, MC (1982) The consequences and causes of high social rank in red deer. Behaviour, 80, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleby, MC (1983) Competition in a red deer stag social group: rank, age and relatedness of opponents. Animal Behaviour, 31, 913–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleby, MC (1993) How animals perceive a hierarchy: reactions to Freeman et al. Animal Behaviour, 46, 1232–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnott, G & Elwood, RW (2009) Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 77, 991–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrette, C (1977) Fighting behavior of muntjac and the evolution of antlers. Evolution, 31, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrette, C (1986) Fighting behavior of wild Sus scrofa. Journal of Mammalogy, 67, 177–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrette, C & Vandal, D (1986) Social rank, dominance, antler size and access to food in snow-bound wild woodland caribou. Behaviour, 97, 118–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barroso, FG, Alados, CL & Boza, J (2000) Social hierarchy in the domestic goat: effect on food habits and production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 69, 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartoš, L & Losos, S (1997) Response of antler growth to changing rank of fallow deer buck during the velvet period. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 75, 1934–1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartoš, L, Perner, V & Losos, S (1988) Red deer stags rank position, body weight and antler growth. Acta Theriologica, 33, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartoš, L, Fričová, B, Bartošová-Víchová, J, et al. (2007) Estimation of the probability of fighting in fallow deer (Dama dama) during the rut. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergeron, P, Grignolio, S, Apollonio, M, et al. (2010) Secondary sexual characteristics signal fighting ability and determine social rank in Alpine ibex (Capra ibex). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64, 1299–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergerud, AT (1974) Rutting behaviour of Newfoundland caribou. In: Geist, V & Walther, F (eds.) The Behaviour of Ungulates and its Relation to Management, pp. 395–435. Morges: IUCN.Google Scholar
Blood, DA, Flook, DR & Wishart, WD (1970) Weights and growth of Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep in western Alberta. Journal of Wildlife Management, 34, 451–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobek, B, Perzanowski, K & Weiner, J (1990) Energy expenditure for reproduction in red deer. Journal of Mammalogy, 71, 230–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowyer, RT (1986) Antler characteristics as related to social status of male southern mule deer. Southwest Naturalist, 31, 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briffa, M & Elwood, RW (2009) Difficulties remain in distinguishing between mutual and self-assessment in animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 77, 759–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubenik, AB (1998) Evolution, taxonomy, and morphophysiology. In: Franzmann, AW & Schwartz, CC (eds.) Ecology and Management of the North American Moose, pp. 77–123. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Caro, TM, Graham, CM, Stoner, CJ, et al. (2003) Correlates of horn and antler shape in bovids and cervids. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55, 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carranza, J, Alvarez, F & Redondo, T (1990) Territoriality as a mating strategy in red deer. Animal Behaviour, 40, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceacero, F, Landete-Castillejos, T, García, AJ, et al. (2007) Kinship discrimination and effects on social rank and aggressiveness levels in Iberian red deer hinds. Ethology, 113, 1133–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, BD, Reby, D & McComb, K (2007) Female red deer prefer the roars of larger males. Biology Letters, 3, 382–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, DL & Seyfarth, RM (2007) Baboon Metaphysics: The Evolution of a Social Mind. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciuti, S & Apollonio, M (2011) Do antlers honestly advertise the phenotypic quality of fallow buck (Dama dama) in a lekking population. Ethology, 117, 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, TH (1982) The functions of antlers. Behaviour, 79, 108–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, TH & Albon, SD (1979) The roaring of red deer and the evolution of honest advertisement. Behaviour, 69, 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, TH, Albon, SD, Gibson, RM, et al. (1979) The logical stag: adaptive aspects of fighting in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Animal Behaviour, 27, 211–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, TH, Guinness, FE & Albon, SD (1982) Red Deer: The Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Côté, SD (2000) Dominance hierarchies in female mountain goats: stability, aggressiveness and determinants of rank. Behaviour, 137, 1541–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugatkin, LA (1998a) Breaking up fights between others: a model of intervention behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 433–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugatkin, LA (1998b) A model of coalition formation in animals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 265, 2121–2125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engh, AL, Siebert, ER, Greenberg, DA, et al. (2005) Patterns of alliance formation and postconflict aggression indicate spotted hyaenas recognize third-party relationships. Animal Behaviour, 69, 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enquist, M & Leimar, O (1983) Evolution of fighting behaviour: decision rules and assessment of relative strength. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 102, 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enquist, M, Leimar, O, Ljungberg, T, et al. (1990) A test of the sequential assessment game: fighting in the cichlid fish Nannacara anomala. Animal Behaviour, 40, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, RD (1991) The Behavior Guide to African Mammals. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Festa-Bianchet, M, Appllonio, M, Mari, F, et al. (1990) Aggression among lekking male fallow deer (Dama dama): territory effects and relationship with copulatory success. Ethology, 85, 236–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festa-Bianchet, M, Coltman, DW, Turelli, L, et al. (2004) Relative allocation to horn and body growth in bighorn rams varies with resource availability. Behavioral Ecology, 15, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floody, DR & Arnold, AP (1975) Uganda kob (Adenota kob thomasi) territory and spatial distribution of sexual and agonistic behaviours at a territorial ground. Zeitschrift fűr Tierpsychologie, 37, 192–212.Google Scholar
Frädrich, H (1974) A comparison of behaviour in the Suidae. In: Geist, V & Walther, F (eds.) The Behaviour of Ungulates and its Relation to Management, pp. 133–143. Morges: IUCN.Google Scholar
Freeman, LC, Freeman, S & Romney, AK (1992) The implications of social structure for dominance hierarchies in red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). Animal Behaviour, 44, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fričová, B, Bartoš, L, Bartošová, J, et al. (2007) Female presence and male agonistic encounters in fallow deer, Dama dama during the rut. Folia Zoologica, 56, 253–262.Google Scholar
Gammell, MP & Hardy, ICW (2003) Contest duration: sizing up the opposition?Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 491–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geist, V (1966a) The evolutionary significance of mountain sheep horns. Evolution, 20, 558–566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geist, V (1966b) The evolution of horn-like organs. Behaviour, 27, 175–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geist, V (1971) Mountain Sheep: A Study in Behaviour and Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Geist, V (1991) Bones of contention revisited: did antlers enlarge with sexual selection as a consequence of neonatal security strategies? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 29, 453–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geist, V & Walther, F (1974). The Behaviour of Ungulates and its Relation to Management. Morges: IUCN Publications.Google Scholar
Greenberg-Cohen, D, Alkon, PU & Yom-Tov, Y (1994) A linear dominance hierarchy in female Nubian ibex. Ethology, 98, 210–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, CC & Jenni, DA (1991) Structure and ontogeny of dominance relationships among bighorn rams. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 69, 471–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirth, DH (1977) Social behavior of white-tailed deer in relation to habitat. Wildlife Monographs, 53, 1–55.Google Scholar
Hoem, SA, Melis, C, Linnell, JDC, et al. (2007) Fighting behaviour in territorial male roe deer Capreolus capreolus: the effects of antler size and residence. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 53, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, Y, Lee, SP, Chen, MH, et al. (2008) Switching assessment strategy during a contest: fighting in killifish Kryptolebias marmoratus. Animal Behaviour, 75, 1641–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, DJ (2007) The effect of chemical immobilization on dominance rank in the fallow deer. Animal Behaviour, 74, 1107–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, DJ (2012) Right-sided bias in the decision to terminate fallow deer parallel walks. Evidence for lateralization during a lateral display. Animal Behaviour, 83, 1427–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, DJ, Gammell, MP, Carlin, CM, et al. (2002) Does lateral presentation of the palmate antlers during fights by fallow deer (Dama dama) signify dominance or submission?Ethology, 108, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, DJ, Gammell, MP, Carlin, CM, et al. (2003) Is the parallel walk between competing male fallow deer (Dama dama) a lateral display of quality?Animal Behaviour, 65, 1005–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, DJ, Gammell, MP, Carlin, CM, et al. (2004) Effect of body weight, antler length, resource value and experience on fight duration and intensity in fallow deer. Animal Behaviour, 68, 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, DJ, Gammell, MP, Payne, RJH, et al. (2005) An investigation of assessment games during fallow deer fights. Ethology, 111, 511–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, DJ, Gammell, MP, Carlin, CM, et al. (2006) Is difference in body weight, antler length, age or dominance rank related to the number of fights between fallow deer (Dama dama)?Ethology, 112, 258–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, DJ, Carlin, CM & Gammell, MP (2009) A winner effect supports third-party intervention behaviour during fallow deer, Dama dama, fights. Animal Behaviour, 77, 343–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, DJ, Carlin, CM, Hayden, TJ, et al. (2010) Investment in fighting in relation to body condition, age and dominance rank in the male fallow deer, Dama dama. Animal Behaviour, 79, 1293–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, DJ, Carlin, CM, Hayden, TJ, et al. (2011) Third-party intervention behaviour during fallow deer fights: the role of dominance, age, fighting and body size. Animal Behaviour, 81, 1217–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, DJ, Elwood, RW, Carlin, CM, et al. (2012) Vocal rate as an assessment process during fallow deer contests. Behavioural Processes, 91, 152–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, P & Yngvesson, J (1998) Aggression between unacquainted pigs – sequential assessment and effects of familiarity and weight. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 58, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, HE, Bleich, VC, Krausman, PR, et al. (2007) Effects of antler breakage on mating behavior in male tule elk (Cervus elaphus nannodes). European Journal of Wildlife Research, 53, 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, NM & Sambraus, HH (1998) ‘Interveners’ in agonistic interactions amongst domesticated goats. International Journal of Mammalian Biology, 63, 266–272.Google Scholar
Kitchen, D & Bromley, PT (1974) Agonistic behaviour of territorial pronghorn bucks. In: Geist, V & Walther, F (eds.) The Behaviour of Ungulates and its Relation to Management, pp. 365–381. Morges: IUCN.Google Scholar
Komers, PE, Meissier, F & Gates, CC (1994) Plasticity of reproductive behaviour in wood bison bulls: on risks and opportunities. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution, 6, 481–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komers, PE, Pélabon, C & Stenström, D (1997) Age at first reproduction in male fallow deer: age-specific versus dominance-specific behaviors. Behavioral Ecology, 8, 456–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladete-Castillejos, T, Currey, JD, Estevez, JA, et al. (2010) Do drastic weather effects on diet influence changes in chemical composition, mechanical properties and structure in deer antlers?Bone, 47, 815–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, GA (1972) The role of antlers in the behaviour of red deer. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 182, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, GA, Youngson, RW & Short, RV (1970) The social and sexual behaviour of the red deer stag. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 11(Suppl.), 71–103.Google Scholar
Loehr, J, Carey, J, Hoefs, M, et al. (2007) Horn growth rate and longevity: implications for natural and artificial selection in thinhorn sheep (Ovis dalli). Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 818–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lott, DF (1979) Dominance relations and breeding rate in mature male American bison. Zeitschrift fűr Tierpsychologie, 49, 418–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundrigan, B (1996) Morphology of horns and fighting behavior in the family Bovidae. Journal of Mammalogy, 77, 462–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malo, AF, Roldan, ERS, Garde, J, et al. (2005) Antlers honestly advertise sperm production and quality. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 149–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattiangeli, V, Mattiello, S & Verga, M (1998) Factors affecting the duration of fights in fallow deer (Dama dama) during the rut. Ethology, Ecology and Evolution, 10, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McComb, KE (1991) Female choice for high roaring rate in red deer, Cervus elaphus. Animal Behaviour, 41, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McComb, K, Reby, D, Baker, L, et al. (2003) Long-distance communication of acoustic cues to social identity in African elephants. Animal Behaviour, 65, 317–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElligott, AG & Hayden, TJ (2001) Postcopulatory vocalizations of fallow bucks: who is listening? Behavioral Ecology, 12, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesterson-Gibbons, M, Marden, JH & Dugatkin, LA (1996) On wars of attrition without assessment. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 181, 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mloszewski, MJ (1983) The Behaviour and Ecology of the African Buffalo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moen, RA & Pastor, J (1998) A model to predict nutritional requirements for antler growth in moose. Alces, 34, 59–74.Google Scholar
Moen, RA, Pastor, J & Cohen, Y (1999) Antler growth and extinction of Irish elk. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 1, 235–249.Google Scholar
Moore, NP, Kelly, PF, Cahill, JP, et al. & Hayden, TJ (1995) Mating strategies and mating success of fallow (Dama dama) bucks in a non-lekking population. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 36, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, WG & Marchington, L (1974) Marking behaviour and its social function in white-tailed deer. In: Geist, V & Walther, F (eds.) The Behaviour of Ungulates and its Relation to Management, pp. 447–456. Morges: IUCN.Google Scholar
Morrell, LJ, Backwell, PRY & Metcalfe, NB (2005) Fighting in fiddler crabs Uca mjoebergi: what determines duration?Animal Behaviour, 70, 653–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, PD, Sykes, AR & Barrell, GK (187) Calcium metabolism in red deer (Cervus elaphus) offered herbages during antlerogenesis: kinetic and stable balance studies. Journal of Agricultural Science, 109, 357–364.CrossRef
Mysterud, A, Meisingset, E, Langvtan, R, et al. (2005) Climate-dependent allocation of resources to secondary sexual traits in red deer. Oikos, 111, 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, RJH (1998) Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model. Animal Behaviour, 56, 651–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peek, JM, Vanballanberghe, V & Miquelle, DG (1986) Intensity of interactions between rutting bull moose in central Alaska. Journal of Mammalogy, 67, 423–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plard, F, Bonefant, C & Galliard, JM (2011) Revisiting the allometry of antlers among deer species: male–male competition as a driver. Oikos, 120, 601–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, JH (1987) Rutting behaviour in African elephants: the phenomenon of musth. Behaviour, 102, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, JH (1989) Announcing intent: the aggressive state of musth in African elephants. Animal Behaviour, 37, 140–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, JH (1999) Signals and assessment in African elephants: evidence from playback experiments. Animal Behaviour, 58, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prenter, J, Elwood, RW & Taylor, PW (2006) Self assessment by males during energetically expensive contests over precopula females in amphipods. Animal Behaviour, 72, 861–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reby, D & McComb, K (2003) Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags. Animal Behaviour, 65, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reby, D, Joachim, J, Lauga, J, et al. (1998) Individuality in the groans of fallow deer (Dama dama) bucks. Journal of Zoology, London, 245, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reby, D, Izquierdo, M, Hewison, AJM, et al. (2001) Red deer (Cervus elaphus) hinds discriminate between the roars of their current harem holder stag and those of neighbouring stags. Ethology, 107, 951–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reby, D, McComb, K, Cargnelutti, B, et al. (2005) Red deer stags use formants as assessment cues during intrasexual agonistic interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 272, 941–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reby, D, André-Obrecht, R, Galinier, A, et al. (2006) Cepstral coefficients and hidden Markov models reveal idiosyncratic voice characteristics in red deer (Cervus elaphus) stags. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 4080–4089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riechert, SE (1998) Game theory and animal conflict. In: Dugatkin, LA & Reeve, HK (eds.) Game Theory and Animal Behavior, pp. 64–93. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roden, C, Vervaecke, H & , Elsacker L (2005) Dominance, age and weight in American bison males (Bison bison) during non-rut in semi-natural conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 92, 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, LJ & Andrew, RJ (2003) Comparative Vertebrate Lateralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, DI & Hack, M (1992) Horse signals: the sounds and scents of fury. Evolutionary Ecology, 6, 254–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Miranda, CR, Szymanski, MD & Ingals, JW (1994) Physical characteristics of the vocalization of domestic goat does Capra hircus in response to their offspring's cries. Bioacoustics, 5, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushen, J (1988) Assessment of fighting ability or simple habituation – what causes young pigs (Sus scrofa) to stop fighting? Aggressive Behaviour, 14, 155–167.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutberg, AT (1986) Dominance and its fitness consequences in American bison cows. Behaviour, 96, 62–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, GB (1967) The Deer and the Tiger. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Searby, A & Jouventin, P (2003) Mother–lamb acoustic recognition in sheep: a frequency coding. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 270, 1765–1771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, J & Dunbar, RIM (2006) Feeding competition within a feral goat population on the Isle of Rhum, NW Scotland. Journal of Zoology, 24, 117–124.Google Scholar
Silk, JB, Alberts, SC & Altmann, J (2004) Patterns of coalition formation by adult female baboons in Amboseli, Kenya. Animal Behaviour, 67, 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, ARE (1974) The social organization of the East African buffalo. In: Geist, V & Walther, F (eds.) The Behaviour of Ungulates and its Relation to Management, pp. 676–689. Morges: IUCN.Google Scholar
Suttie, JM (1980) The effect of antler removal on dominance and fighting behaviour in farmed red deer stags. Journal of Zoology, London, 190, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taillon, J & Côté, SD (2006) The role of previous social encounters and body mass in determining social rank: an experiment with white-tailed deer. Animal Behaviour, 72, 1103–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, PW & Elwood, RW (2003) The mismeasure of animal contests. Animal Behaviour, 65, 1195–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennenhouse, E, Weladji, RB, Holland, Ø, et al. (2011) Mating group composition influences somatic costs and activity in rutting dominant male reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirgood, SJ (1990) Alternative mating strategies and reproductive success in fallow deer. Behaviour, 116, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vannoni, E & McElligott, AG (2009) Fallow bucks get hoarse: vocal fatigue as a possible signal to conspecifics. Animal Behaviour, 78, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanpé, C, Gaillard, JM, Kjellander, P, et al. (2010) Assessing the intensity of sexual selection on male body mass and antler length in roe deer Capreolus capreolus: is bigger better in a weakly dimorphic species?Oikos, 119, 1484–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahlström, LK (1994) The significance of male–male aggression for yearling dispersal in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35, 409–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahome, JM (1995) Changes in interactions among tule elk bulls, Cervus elaphus nannodes. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Walther, FR (1974) Some reflections on expressive behaviour in combats and courtship of certain horned ungulates. In: Geist, V & Walther, F (eds.) The Behaviour of Ungulates and its Relation to Management, pp. 56–98. Morges: IUCN.Google Scholar
Weary, DM & Fraser, D (1995) Signalling need: costly signals and animal welfare assessment. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 44, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkenson, PF & Shank, CC (1976) Rutting fight mortality among musk oxen on Banks Island, Northwest Territories, Canada. Animal Behaviour, 24, 756–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willisch, CS & Neuhaus, P (2010) Social dominance and conflict reduction in rutting male ibex, Capra ibex. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 372–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, JO (1998) Breeding strategies, mate choice, and reproductive success in American bison. Oikos, 83, 529–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahavi, A (1975) Mate selection – a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×