Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T20:17:31.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - From Imperial to Socialist Nature Preservation

Environmental Protection and Resource Development in the Russian Empire, 1861–1925

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2013

Paul Josephson
Affiliation:
Colby College
Nicolai Dronin
Affiliation:
Moscow State University
Ruben Mnatsakanian
Affiliation:
Central European University, Budapest
Aleh Cherp
Affiliation:
Central European University, Budapest
Dmitry Efremenko
Affiliation:
Russian Academy of Sciences
Vladislav Larin
Affiliation:
Russian Academy of Sciences
Get access

Summary

A series of tensions played out in the environmental history of the Russian empire. These tensions had an impact on policies, practices, institutions, and human–nature interactions in the Soviet period. One was top-down pressure to modernize, by which leading officials including such tsars as Peter the Great meant to westernize, in part through adopting enlightenment attitudes toward nature and landscape. By force of will – or force of military and political occupation – Russia would create modern industry and agriculture across an ever-expanding empire. A second tension existed precisely between the power of the state and the private sector, between autocracy and public participation. In the Russian Empire, given the central role of the state, which rivaled or exceeded that in other nations, any environmental concern – alarm about the health of the forest, worries about agricultural performance and quality of soils, or concerns of nascent conservation movements – played out against concerns about the power of the government. The state could be a force of modernization and reform yet also a brake on development through its policies. Granted, the tsarist state had fewer bureaucrats per capita than the major European states and relied on devolving administration on the local population – nobles, peasant communes, and so on. Still, regarding the environment, it had a crucial role. The tsars determined to expand the empire and tame the periphery, push back the frontier, settle the steppe, and create agriculture that met the needs of growing domestic markets and export. No longer would agriculture be subsistence. This required that arable land succumb to agronomy, that polar and subpolar regions reveal their secrets, that Siberia become a part of the patrimony of the tsars and contribute to the economy, and that nomadic and indigenous people in lightly settled areas give way to settlers.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Marks, Stephen, The Road to Power: The Trans-Siberian Railroad and the Colonization of Asian Russia, 1850–1917 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Hays, Samuel, Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1959)Google Scholar
“Current Progress in Conservation Work,” Science, vol. 29 (March 26, 1909), pp. 490–491
Adams, Charles, “The Conservation of Predatory Animals,” Journal of Mammalogy, vol. 6, no. 2 (May 1925), pp. 83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, Henry, “The Conservation Problem of the Paper and Pulp Industry,” Scientific Monthly, vol. 20, no. 3 (March 1925), pp. 225–235Google Scholar
Simms, J. Y., “Economic Impact of the Russian Famine of 1891–92,” The Slavonic and East European Review, vol. 60, no. 1 (January 1982), pp. 63–74Google Scholar
Reeves, Francis, Russia Then and Now, 1892–1917: My Mission to Russia During the Famine of 1891–1892 (New York, London, G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1917)Google Scholar
Kirikov, S. V., Chelovek i Priroda Vostochno-Evropeiskoi Lesostepi v X – nachale XIX v. (Moscow: Nauka, 1979)Google Scholar
Antropogennye Factory v Istorii Razvitiia Sovremenennykh Ekosistem (Moscow: Nauka, 1981)
Rekliu, E., Bakhrushin, S. V., Ocherki po Istorii Kolonizatsii Sibiri v XVI I XVII vv. (Moscow: M. and S. Sabashnikovykh 1927)
Strumilin, S. G., Istoriia Chernoi Metallurgii v SSSR. Feodal'nyi Period (1500–1860 gg.), I, (Moscow: 1954)Google Scholar
Boreiko, B. E., Ekologicheskie Traditsii, Dover'ia, Religioznye Vozzrezniia Slaviansikh i Drugikh Narodov, 2nd ed., I (Kiev: Kievskii Ekolog-Kul'turnyi Tsentr, 1997), p. 224Google Scholar
Prirodnye Sviatyni Rossii (po Materialam Knig Al. A. Grigor'ev Sviatyni Rossii) (St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Izdatel'stvo, 2004)
Grigor'ev, A. A., Prirodnye Sviatyni (St. Petersburg: Obrazovanie, 1997)Google Scholar
Elina, Ol'ga Yur'evna, Ot Tsarskikh Sadov do Sovetskikh Polei: Istoriia Sel'sko-Khoziaistvennykh Opytnykh Uchrezhdenii XVIII-20-e gody XX v. 2 vol. (Moscow: IIEiT RAN, 2008)Google Scholar
Crummey, Robert O., The Old Believers and the World of the Antichrist (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1970)Google Scholar
Teplyakov, V. K., Kuzmichev, Ye. P., Baumgartner, D. M., and Everet, R. L., A History of Russian Forestry and Its Leaders (Pullman, WA: Washington State University, 1998), pp. 2–4, 13Google Scholar
Teplyakov, et al., A History of Russian Forestry and Its Leaders, pp. 5–7
Bassin, Mark, “The Russian Geographical Society, the ‘Amur Epoch,’ and the Great Siberian Expedition, 1855–1863,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 73, no. 2 (1983), pp. 240–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richkov, P. I., “O Sberezhenii i Razmnozhenii Lesov,” in Trudy Vol'nogo Ekonomicheskogo Obshchestva, k Pooshchreniiu v Rossii Zemledeliia i Domostroitel'stva, chap. VI (St. Petersburg: Free Economic Society, 1767), pp. 84–112Google Scholar
Brain, Stephen, Song of the Forest: Russian Forestry and Stalin's Environmentalism, 1905–1953 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2011), chap. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Imaginations of Destruction: The ‘Forest Question’ in Nineteenth Century Russian Culture,” Russian Review, vol. 62, no. 1 (January 2003), pp. 91–118
Baur, F., Lesnaia Taksatsiia, trans. Shafranov, A. S. (St. Petersburg, 1878)Google Scholar
Vrangel, V., Istoriia Lesnogo Zakonodatel'stva Rossiiskoi Imperii (St. Petersburg, 1841)Google Scholar
Bode, A., Ruchnaia Kniga dlia Khoziaistvennago Obrashcheniia s Lesami, trans. Grakhoi, Ia. (St. Petersburg, 1843)Google Scholar
Denisov, V. I., Lesa Rossii, ikh Eksploatatskii i Lesnaia Torgovlia (St. Petersburg, 1911)Google Scholar
Shelgunov, N. and Greve, V., Lesnaia Tekhnologiia (St. Petersburg, 1858)Google Scholar
Popov, A. N., Lesnaia Tekhnologiia (St. Petersburg, 1871)Google Scholar
Bokov, V. E., Drevoobrabotyvaiushaia Promyshlennost’ v Permskoi Gubernoii (Perm, 1899)Google Scholar
Rauner, S. Iu., Gornye Lesa Turkestana i Znachenie ikh dlia Vodnago Khoziaistva Kraia (St. Petersburg, 1901)Google Scholar
Ozerov, Ivan, K Voprosu o Nashikh Severnykh Lesakh (Moscow, 1911)Google Scholar
Strogii, A. A., O Lesakh Sibiri (St. Petersburg, 1911)Google Scholar
Bovin, A. I., Tsepliaev, B. P., and Kovalin, D. T., Lesnoe Khoziaistvo SSSR, 1917–1918 (Moscow-Leningrad: Goslesbumizdat, 1958), pp. 38–39Google Scholar
Weiner, Douglas, Models of Nature (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988), pp. 9–12Google Scholar
Bonhomme, Brian, Forests, Peasants and Revolutionaries (Boulder, CO: East European Monographs, 2005), p. 58Google Scholar
Pinchot, Gifford, “The Relation of Forests to Stream Control,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 31 (January 1908), pp. 219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Foundations of Prosperity,” The North American Review, vol. 188, no. 636 (November 1908), pp. 740–752
Baranetskii, P. V., Lesokhranenie (St. Petersburg, 1880)Google Scholar
Veinberg, Ia., Les, Znachenie ego v Prirode i Mery ego Sokhranenie (Moscow, 1884)Google Scholar
Doklad Vtoroi Kommissii po Voprosu o Merakh Bor'by Protiv Pochvivshagos v Lesakh (Moscow, 1895)
Shimanovskii, N. Iu., Okhrana Lesa (St. Petersburg: S. N. 1910)Google Scholar
Zaitsev, D. M., Nuzhny Li v Rossii Lesookhranitel'nye raboty (St. Petersburg: S. N. 1911)Google Scholar
Kuznetsov, N. I., O Russkom Lese. Pochemu Dolzhno Berech Les (St. Petersburg, 1913)Google Scholar
Chekhov, Anton, Polnoe Sobranie Sochinenii i Pisem (Moscow, 1972–1984), vol. 13, pp. 72–73Google Scholar
Moon, David, “The Debate over Climate Change in the Steppe Region in Nineteenth-Century Russia,” Russian Review, vol. 69 (April 2010), pp. 251–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breyfogle, Nicholas, Schrader, Abby, and Sunderland, Willard, eds., Peopling the Russian Periphery: Borderland Colonization in Eurasian History (London: Routledge, 2007), pp. 81–105
Moon'sThe Russian Peasantry, 1600–1930: The World the Peasants Made, (Boston: Addison Wesley Longman, 1999)Google Scholar
Sunderland, Willard, Taming the Wild Field: Colonization and Empire on the Russian Steppe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Moon, David, “Peasant Migration and the Settlement of Russia's Frontiers, 1550–1897,” Historical Journal, vol. 40, no. 4 (December 1997), pp. 859–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerans, David, Mind and Labor on the Far in Black-Earth Russia, 1861–1914 (Budapest: Central European University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Mironov, Boris, “The Peasant Commune After the Reforms of the 1860s,” Slavic Review, vol. 44, no. 3 (Autumn 1985), pp. 438–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Cathy, “Razdel: The Peasant Family Divided,” Russian Review, vol. 46, no. 1 (January 1987), pp. 35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frierson, Cathy, All of Russia is Burning! (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Pallot, Judith and Shaw, Denis, Landscape and Settlement in Romanov Russia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Kerans, “Toward a Wider View of the Agrarian Problem in Russia, 1861–1930,” Kritika, vol. 1, no. 4 (Fall 2000), pp. 657–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volin, Lazar, A Century of Russian Agriculture (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joravsky, David, The Lysenko Affairs (New York: Harvard University Press, 1970), pp. 18–24Google Scholar
Timiriazev, K. A., The Life of a Plant (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1912)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nauka i Demokratiia (Moscow: Gosizdat, 1920
Polnov, B. B., Vasilii Vasil'evich Dokuchaev (Moscow: Academy of Sciences, 1956)Google Scholar
Krupenikov, I. A., Vasilii Vasil'evich Dokuchaev (Moscow: Molodaia Gvardiia, 1949)Google Scholar
Robbins, Richard, Famine in Russia, 1891–1892 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Moon, David, The Environmental History of the Russian Steppes: Vasilii Dokuchaev and the Harvest Failure of 1891 (London: Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 2005)Google Scholar
Moon, , The Environmental History of the Russian Steppes
Whymper, Frederick, Fisheries of the World (London: C. Cassell and Co., 1884), pp. 333–334Google Scholar
Terent'ev, A. V., “Russkii Prioritet v Mekhanizatsii Rybnoi Promyshlennosti,” Rybnoe Khoziaistvo, no. 11 (1950), pp. 7–10Google Scholar
Kiselev, A. and Krasnobaev, A. I., Istoriia Murmanskogo Tralovogo Flota, 1920–1970 gg. (Murmansk: Murmanskoe Knizhnoe Izdatel'stvo, 1973), pp. 18–25Google Scholar
Usachev, P. I., ed., Sbornik, Posviashchennyi Nauchnoi Deiatel'nosti Pochetnogo Chlena Akademii nauk SSSR, Zasluzhennogo Deiatelia Nauki i Tekhniki, Nikolaia Mikhailovicha Knipovicha (Moscow-Leningrad: Pishchepromizdat, 1939), pp. 5–12
Grimm, O. A., Nikol'skii Rybovodnyi Zavod (St. Petersburg: P. P. Soikin, 1902)Google Scholar
Usachov, P. I., ed., Sbornik, Posviashchennyi Nauchnoi Deiatel'nosti Pochetnogo Chlena Akademii Nauk, Zasluzhennogo Deiatelia Nauki i Tekhniki, Nikolai Mikhailovich Knipovicha (1885–1939) (Moscow: Pishchepromizdat, 1939)
Knipovich, N. M., Ekspeditsiia Nauchnopromyslovykh Issledovanii u Beregov Murmana, I (St. Petersburg: Khudozhestvennaia Pechat’, 1902), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
Mechnikov, L. I., La Civilisation et les Grands Fleuves Historiques (Paris: Hachette et cie, 1889)Google Scholar
Engelgardt, Alexander, Letters from the Countryside, trans. and intro. by Frierson, Cathy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Bailes, Kendall E., Science and Russian Culture in an Age of Revolutions (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Dowler, Wayne, Dostoevsky, Grigor'ev and Native Soil Conservatism (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costlow, “Imaginations of Destruction”; and Ely, Christopher, This Meager Nature: Landscape and national Identity in Imperial Russia (DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
V. V. Dezhkin, V. V Snakin, Zapovednoe Delo: Tolkovyi Terminologicheskii Slovar-Spravochnik s Kommentariiami (Moscow: NIA-Priroda, 2003)
Shtilmark, Feliks, The History of Russian Zapovedniks, 1895–1995, trans. Harper, G. H. (Edinburgh: Russian Nature Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Danilina, Natalia, “The Zapovedniks of Russia,” The George Wright Forum, vol. 18, no. 1 (2001): pp. 48–49Google Scholar
Ipatieff, Vladimir, The Life of a Chemist (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1948)Google Scholar
Knipovich, N. M., Kaspiiskoe More i Ego Promysly (Berlin: Z. I. Grzhebin, 1923), pp. 82–83Google Scholar
Josephson, Paul, “Science Policy in the Soviet Union, 1917–1927,” Minerva, vol. XXVI, no. 3 (Autumn 1988), pp. 342–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×