Burrell, Barbara C.A Woman's Place Is in the House. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994Google Scholar

Carroll, Susan J.The Impact of Women in Public Office. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Cooper, Joseph, ed. Congress and the Decline of Public Trust: Why Can't the Government Do What's Right. Boulder: Westview Press, 1999Google Scholar

Gertzog, Irwin N.Women and Power on Capitol Hill: Reconstructing the Congressional Women's Caucus. Boulder: Lynne Reinner Publishers, 2004Google Scholar

Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. Congress as Public Enemy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hibbing, John R.Congressional Careers: Contours of Life in the U.S. House of Representatives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991Google Scholar

Loomis, Burdett A.The New American Politician: Ambition, Entrepreneurship, and the Changing Face of Political Life. New York: Basic Books, 1988Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R.America's Congress: Actions in the Public Sphere – James Madison through Newt Gingrich. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000Google Scholar

Mikulski, Barbaraet al. Nine and Counting: The Women of the Senate.New York: William Morrow and Company, 2000Google Scholar

Ornstein, Norman J., Mann, Thomas E., and Malbin, Michael. Vital Statistics on Congress, 2001–2002. Washington: AEI Press, 2002Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Cindy S., ed. Women Transforming Congress. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2002Google Scholar

Schaffner, Brian F., Schiller, Wendy J., and Sellers, Patrick J.. “Tactical and Contextual Determinants of U.S. Senators' Approval Ratings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28, no. 2 (2003): 203–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Corbetta, Renatto. “Gender Turnover and Roll-Call Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29, no. 2 (2004): 215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth. “The Changing Textbook Congress,” In Can the Government Govern?, edited by Chubb, John E. and Peterson, Paul E.. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1989Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. The Transformation of the U.S. Senate. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Swain, Carol. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993Google Scholar

Swers, Michele L.The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002Google Scholar

The Year of the Woman: Myths and Reality, edited by Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Thomas, Sue, and Wilcox, Clyde. Boulder: Westview, 1994Google Scholar

Thomas, Sue. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994Google Scholar

Tolchin, Susan, and Tolchin, Martin. Glass Houses: Congressional Ethics and the Politics of Venom. Boulder: Westview Press, 2003Google Scholar

Whitby, Kenny J.The Color of Representation: Congressional Behavior and Black Interests. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998Google Scholar

Anderson, Thorton. Creating the Constitution: The Convention of 1787 and the First Congress. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993Google Scholar

Barclay, John M.Constitution of the United States of America with the Amendments thereto: To Which are Added Jefferson's Manual of Parliamentary Practice, The Standing Rules and Orders for Conducting Business in The House of Representatives and Senate of the United States and Barclay's Digest of the Rules of Proceeding in the House of Representatives of the United States. Washington: Government Printing Office. 1860, 1863, 1867, 1868, 1872Google Scholar

Bates, Ernest S.The Story of Congress: 1789–1935. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1936Google Scholar

Bessette, Joseph M.The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah. “Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–96.” American Political Science Review 93 (1999): 519–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrd, Robert C.The Senate, 1789–1989. Vol. 4. Historical Statistics, 1789–1992. 100th Congress, 1st session. S. Doc. 100–20. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1993Google Scholar

Cooper, Joseph. Congress and its Committees: A Historical Approach to the Role of Committees in the Legislative Process. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1988Google Scholar

Cooper, Joseph. The Origins of the Standing Committees and the Development of the Modern House. Houston: William Marsh Rice University, 1970Google Scholar

Currie, David P.The Constitution Congress: The Federalist Period, 1789–1801. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger, and Oleszek, Walter. Congress Against Itself. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard Jr.The United States Senate: A Bicameral Perspective. Washington: American Enterprise Institute, 1982Google Scholar

Grant, J. Tobin, and Rudolph, Thomas J.. “The Job of Representation in Congress: Public Expectations and Representative Approval.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29, no. 3 (2004): 431–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haynes, George H.The Election of Senators. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1906Google Scholar

Haynes, George H.The Senate of the United States: Its History and Practice. 2 vols. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1938Google Scholar

Jefferson, Thomas. A Manual of Parliamentary Practice for the Use of the Senate of the United States. First Edition 1801 With Annotations by the Author. Washington: Samuel Harrison Smith, 1801. Reprint, Washington: Government Printing Office (page references are to the reprint edition), 1993Google Scholar

Jillson, Calvin, and Wilson, Rick. Congressional Dynamics: Structure, Coordination, and Choice in the First American Congress, 1774–1789. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994Google Scholar

Morgan, Donald. Congress and the Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rakove, Jack N.Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Vintage, 1997Google Scholar

Riker, William H. “The Senate and American Federalism.” American Political Science Review 49, no. 2 (1955): 452–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothman, David J.Politics and Power: The United States Senate, 1869–1901. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schickler, Eric. Disjointed Pluralism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Schiller, Wendy. Partners and Rivals: Representation in U.S. Senate Delegations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000Google Scholar

Swift, Elaine K.The Making of an American Senate: Reconstitutive Change in Congress, 1787–1841. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Woodrow. Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1885 [1985]Google Scholar

Young, James S.The Washington Community, 1800–1828. New York: Columbia University Press, 1966Google Scholar

U.S. Senate History Website. http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/g_three_sections_with_teasers/origins.htm

Abramowitz, Alan I., and Segal, Jeffrey. Senate Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992Google Scholar

Baretto, Matt A., Segura, Gary M., and Woods, Nathan D.. “The Mobilizing Effect of Majority-Minority Districts on Latino Turnout.” American Political Science Review 98, no. 1 (2004): 65–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biersack, Robert, Green, John, Herrnson, Paul, Powell, Lynda, and Wilcox, Clyde. The Financiers of Congressional Elections: Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003Google Scholar

Brady, David W.Critical Elections and Congressional Policy Making. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988Google Scholar

Burden, Barry, and ball, David Kim. Why Americans Split Their Tickets: Campaigns, Competition, and Divided Government. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, James E.The Presidential Pulse of Congressional Elections. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1993Google Scholar

Canon, David T.Race, Redistricting, and Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991Google Scholar

Canon, David. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999Google Scholar

Citrin, J., Schickler, Eric, and Sides, John. “What if Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 1 (2003): 75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corrado, Anthony, Mann, Thomas E., and Potter, Trevor, eds. Inside the Campaign Finance Battle: Court Testimony on the New Reforms. Washington: The Brookings Institution Press, 2003Google Scholar

Currinder, Marian L. “Leadership PAC Contributions Strategies and House Member Ambitions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28, no. 4 (2003): 551–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dion, Douglas. Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dwyer, Diane, and Farrar-Meyers, Victoria. Legislative Labyrinth: Congress and Campaign Finance Reform. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2000Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard Jr.Congress at the Grassroots: Representational Change in the South, 1970–1998. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard Jr.Senators on the Campaign Trail: The Politics of Representation. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1996Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P.Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Fowler, Linda, and McClure, Robert. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Glazer, Amihai, and Grofman, Bernard. “Two Plus Two Plus Two Equals Six: Tenure of Office of Senators and Representatives, 1953–1983.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12, no. 4 (1987): 555–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gronke, Paul. The Electorate, the Campaign, and the Office: A Unified Approach to Senate and House Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, Christian, and Yoshinaka, Antoine. “The Electoral Consequences of Party Switching by Incumbent Members of Congress, 1947–2000.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28, no. 1 (2003): 55–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herrnson, Paul S.Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington, 3rd ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2000Google Scholar

Jacobson, G. and Kernell, S.. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C.The Politics of Congressional Elections, 5th ed. New York: Longman, 1994Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary, Kernell, Samuel, and Lazarus, Jeffrey. “Assessing the President's Role as Party Agent in Congressional Elections: The Case of Bill Clinton in 2000.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29, no. 2 (2004): 159–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, David R., and McDermott, Monika L.. “The Responsible Party Government Model in House and Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 48, no. 1 (2004): 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahn, Kim F., and Kenney, Patrick J.. The Spectacle of U.S. Senate Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999Google Scholar

Kazee, Thomas, ed. Who Runs for Congress? Ambition, Context, and Candidate Emergence. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1994Google Scholar

Lewis-Beck, Michael, and Rice, Tom. Forecasting Elections. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1992Google Scholar

Lipinski, Daniel L., Bianco, William T., and Work, Ryan. “What Happens When House Members ‘Run with Congress’? Consequences of Institutional Loyalty.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28, no. 3 (2003): 413–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maisel, L. Sandy. From Obscurity to Oblivion: Running in the Congressional Primary. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1982Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas E.Unsafe at Any Margin: Interpreting Congressional Elections. Washington: American Enterprise Institute Press, 1978Google Scholar

Nelson, Candice J., Dulio, David A., and Medvic, Stephen K.. Shades of Gray: Perspectives on Campaign Ethics. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2002Google Scholar

Peterson, Davidet al. “Congressional Response to Mandate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 3 (2003): 411–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stone, Walter L.Maisel, Sandy, and Maestas, Cherie. “Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence.” American Journal of Political Science 48, no. 3 (2004): 479–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tate, Katherine “Black Opinion on the Legitimacy of Racial Redistricting and Minority-Majority Districts.” American Political Science Review 97, no. 1 (2003): 45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thurber, James. ed. The Battle for Congress: Consultants, Candidates, and Voters. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2000Google Scholar

West, Darrell M.Air Wars: Television Advertising in Election Campaigns 1952–1996. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1997Google Scholar

Wolfensberger, Donald. Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999Google Scholar

Websites: Federal Election Commission. http:/www.fec.gov/

Census Bureau (Districts and Apportionment). http://fastfacts.census.gov/home/cws/main.html

Adler, E. Scott. Why Congressional Reforms Fail. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2002Google Scholar

Bach, Stanley, and Smith, Steven S.. Managing Uncertainty in the House of Representatives: Adaptation and Innovation in Special Rules. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1988Google Scholar

Alexander, DeAlva S.History and Procedure of the House of Representatives. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1916Google Scholar

Beeman, Richard R. “Unlimited Debate in the Senate: The First Phase.” Political Science Quarterly 83, no. 3 (1968): 419–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah, and Smith, Steven S.. Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States Senate. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1997Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah. “Partisanship and Procedural Choice: Institutional Change in the Early Congress, 1789–1823.” Journal of Politics 57, no. 4 (1995): 1093–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. Cambridge, U.K.; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burdette, Franklin L.Filibustering in the Senate. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1940Google Scholar

Foley, Michael. The New Senate: Liberal Influence on a Conservative Institution, 1959–1972. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980Google Scholar

Oleszek, Walter. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 5th ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2001Google Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth, and Weingast, Barry. “When Do Rules of Procedure Matter?” Journal of Politics 46, no. 1 (1984): 206–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress, 2nd ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2000Google Scholar

Tiefer, Charles. Congressional Practice and Procedure. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1989Google Scholar

Wolfensberger, Donald. Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2000Google Scholar

Websites:

House Rules. http://www.house.gov/rules

Senate Rules. http://www.senate.gov/reference/reference_index_subjects/Rules_and_Procedure_vrd.htm

Library of Congress (Thomas). http://thomas.loc.gov/

Bill Process (brief). http://www.house.gov/house/Tying_it_all.shtml

Bill Process (long). http://thomas.loc.gov/home/holam.txt

Abramson, Paul, Aldrich, John, and Rohde, David. “Progressive Ambition Among United States Senators: 1972–1988.” Journal of Politics 49, no. 1 (1987): 3–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Ross K.Friend and Foe in the U.S. Senate. New York: Free Press, 1980Google Scholar

Bianco, William. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canon, David. Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts: Political Amateurs in the United States Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990Google Scholar

Cook, Timothy E.Making Laws and Making News: Media Strategies in the U.S. House of Representatives. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1989Google Scholar

Davidson, Roger H.The Role of the Congressman. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969Google Scholar

Dodd, Lawrence C. “Congress and the Quest for Power,” edited by Dodd, L. C. and Oppenheimer, B.. Congress Reconsidered. New York: Praeger, 1977Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard Jr.Going Home: Black Representatives and Their Constituents. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard Jr.Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown, 1978Google Scholar

Fowler, Linda, and McClure, Robert. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress? New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Fox, Harrison Jr., and Hammond, Susan W.. Congressional Staffs: The Invisible Force in American Lawmaking. New York: Free Press, 1977Google Scholar

Lee, Frances E., and Oppenheimer, Brice I.. Sizing Up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999Google Scholar

Lee, Frances E. “Bicameralism and Geographic Politics: Allocating Funds in the House and Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29, no. 2 (2004): 185–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loomis, Burdett. The New American Politician. New York: Basic Books, 1988Google Scholar

Matthews, Donald. U.S. Senators and their World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1960Google Scholar

Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57, no. 1 (1963): 45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, Glenn R.Homeward Bound: Explaining Changes in Congressional Behavior. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1986Google Scholar

Price, David E.The Congressional Experience: A View from the Hill, 2nd ed. Boulder: Westview Press, 2000Google Scholar

Rocca, Michael S. “Military Base Closures and the 1996 Congressional Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28, no. 4 (2003): 529–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wawro, Gregory. Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Websites:

Current Representatives. http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.shtml

Current Senators. http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Congressional Budget Office. http://www.cbo.gov/

Government Accountability Office. http://www.gao.gov/

Aldrich, John, and Rohde, David. “The Transition to Republican Rule in the House: Implications for Theories of Congressional Politics.” Political Science Quarterly 112, no. 4 (1997): 541–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John, Mark Berger, and David Rohde. “The Historical Variability in Conditional Party Government, 1877–1994.” In Parties, Procedure and Policy: Essays on the History of Congress, edited by Brady, D. and McCubbins, M.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002Google Scholar

Aldrich, John H.Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James Jr., and Stewart, Charles III. “The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26, no. 4 (2001): 533–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bawn, Kathleen. “Congressional Party Leadership: Utilitarian versus Majoritarian Incentives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23, no. 2 (1998): 219–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David, Epstein, David, and McCubbins, Mathew, eds. Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002Google Scholar

Burden, Barry C., and Frisby, Tammy N.. “Preferences, Partisanship, and Whip Activity in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29, no. 4 (2004): 569–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caro, Robert A.The Years of Lyndon Johnson: Master of the Senate. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002Google Scholar

Connelly, William Jr., and Pitney, John. Congress' Permanent Minority? Republicans in the U.S. House. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1994Google Scholar

Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew. Legislative Leviathan Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcomingGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993Google Scholar

Forgette, Richard. “Party Caucuses and Coordination: Assessing Caucus Activity and Party Effects.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29, no. 3 (2004): 407–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frohman, Lewis Jr., and Ripley, Randall. “Conditions for Party Leadership: The Case of the House Democrats.” American Political Science Review 59, no. 1 (1965): 52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gamm, Gerald, and Steven S. Smith. “The Dynamics of Party Government in Congress.” In Congress Reconsidered, 7th ed., edited by Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2001Google Scholar

Gamm, Gerald, and Steven S. Smith. “The Emergence of Senate Party Leadership,” in Senate Exceptionalism, edited by Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2002Google Scholar

Hasbrouck, Paul D.Party Government in the House of Representatives. New York: Macmillan, 1927Google Scholar

Hess, Stephen. The Ultimate Insiders. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1986Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. “Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection,” in Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, edited by Bond, J. and Fleischer, R.. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2000Google Scholar

Jenkins, Jeffrey, and Stewart, Charles III. “Out in the Open: The Emergence of Viva Voce Voting in House Speakership Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28, no. 4 (2003): 481–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, Charles O.The Minority Party in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown, 1970Google Scholar

Kolodny, Robin. Pursuing Majorities: Congress Campaign Committees in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1998Google Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest. Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manley, John F.The Politics of Finance. Boston: Little, Brown, 1970Google Scholar

Nokken, Timothy, and Poole, Keith. “Congressional Party Defection in American History.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29, no. 4 (2004): 545–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peabody, Robert. Leadership in Congress: Stability, Succession, and Change. Boston: Little, Brown, 1976Google Scholar

Peters, Ronald M.The American Speakership: The Office in Historical Perspective, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997Google Scholar

Ripley, Randall B.Majority Party Leadership in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown, 1969Google Scholar

Rohde, David W.Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking: The U.S. House of Representatives in the Postreform Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. Majority Leadership in the U.S. House. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S., and Gerald Gamm. “The Dynamics of Party Government in Congress.” In Congress Reconsidered, edited by Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2001Google Scholar

Websites:

House Party Leaders & Organizations. http://www.house.gov/house/orgs_pub_hse_ldr_www.shtml

Senate Party Leaders & Organizations. http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/senators/a_three_sections_with_teasers/leadership.htm

Aldrich, John, and Rohde, David W.. “The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee.” Journal of Politics 62, no. 1 (2000): 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgartner, F., Jones, B., and MacLeod, M.. “The Evolution of Legislative Jurisdictions.” Journal of Politics 62, no. 2 (2000): 321–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Roger H. “Subcommittee Government: New Channels for Policy Making.” In The New Congress, eds. Mann, Thomas and Ornstein, Norman. Washington: American Enterprise Institute Press, 1981Google Scholar

Deering, Christopher J., and Smith, Steven S.. Committees in Congress, 3rd ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, C. Lawrence, and Olezsek, Walter. Congress under Fire: Reform Politics and the Republican Majority. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1997Google Scholar

EvansLawrence, C.. Leadership in Committee: A Comparative Analysis of Leadership Behavior in the U.S. Senate. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard Jr.Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown, 1973Google Scholar

Fenno, Richard Jr.The Power of the Purse. Boston: Little, Brown, 1966Google Scholar

Goodwin, George. The Little Legislatures: Committees of Congress. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1970Google Scholar

Hall, Richard I.Participation in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996Google Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991Google Scholar

King, David. Turf Wars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longley, Lawrence, and Oleszek, Walter. Bicameral Politics: Conference Committees in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Mayhew, David R.Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974Google Scholar

McConachie, Lauros G.Congressional Committees: A Study of the Origins and Development of Our National and Local Legislative Methods. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1898Google Scholar

Schickler, Eric, McGhee, Eric, and Sides, John. “Remaking the House and Senate: Personal Power, Ideology, and the 1970s Reforms.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28, no. 3 (2003): 297–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth. The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978Google Scholar

Smith, Steven S.Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1989Google Scholar

Strahan, Randall. New Ways and Means: Reform and Change in a Congressional Committee. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990Google Scholar

Websites:

House Committees. http://www.house.gov/house/CommitteeWWW.shtml

Senate Committees. http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/committees/d_three_sections_with_teasers/committees_home.htm

Historical Committees. http://web.mit.edu/17.251/www/data_page.html#1

Anderson, William, Box-Steffensmeier, Janet, and Sinclair-Chapman, Valerie. “The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28, no. 3 (2003): 357–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, R. Douglas. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990Google Scholar

Bach, Stanley, and Smith, Steven S.. Managing Uncertainty in the House of Representatives: Adaptation and Innovation in Special Rules. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1988Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah, and Smith, Steven S.. Politics or Principle? Filibustering in the United States Senate. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1997Google Scholar

Calvert, Randall, and Fenno, Richard F. Jr. “Strategy and Sophisticated Voting in the Senate.” Journal of Politics 56, no. 2 (1994): 349–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clausen, Aage. How Congressmen Decide. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1973Google Scholar

Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review 98, no. 2 (2004): 355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loomis, Burdette, ed. Esteemed Colleagues: Civility and Deliberation in the U.S. Senate. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2001Google Scholar

Frantzich, Stephen, and Sullivan, John. The C-SPAN Revolution. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1999Google Scholar

Gamm, Gerald, and Steven S. Smith. “Last Among Equals: The Presiding Officer of the Senate.” In Esteemed Colleagues: Civility and Deliberation in the United States Senate, edited by Loomis, B.. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2000Google Scholar

Jackson, John, and Kingdon, John. “Ideology, Interest Group Score, and Legislative Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 36, no. 3 (1992): 805–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, David C., and Zeckhauser, Richard L.. “Congressional Vote Options.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28, no. 3 (2003): 387–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kingdon, John W.Congressmen's Voting Decisions, 3rd ed. Ann Arbor: University Of Michigan Press, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996Google Scholar

Roberts, Jason M., and Smith, Seven S.. “Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives: 1971–2000.” American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 2 (2003): 305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Steven S.Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1989Google Scholar

Websites:

Library of Congress (Thomas).http://thomas.loc.gov

Roll-Call Voting Data, NOMINATE Scores. http://www.voteview.com

Recent Roll-Call Voting Data, Raw Voting Files. http://web.mit.edu/17.251/www/data_page.html#3

House Committee on Rules. http://www.house.gov/rules/

Aberbach, Joel D.Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1990Google Scholar

Binder, Sarah. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–1996.” American Political Science Review 93, no. 3 (1999): 519–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2003Google Scholar

Binkley, Wilfred. President and Congress. New York: Knopf, 1947Google Scholar

Bond, Jon, and Fleisher, Richard. The President and the Congress in a Partisan Era. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2000Google Scholar

Bond, John, and Fleisher, Richard. The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990Google Scholar

Brady, David W., and Volden, Craig. Revolving Gridlock. Boulder: Westview, 1998Google Scholar

Cameron, Charles. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collier, Kenneth E.Between the Branches: The White House Office of Legislative Affairs. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ripley, Randall, and Lindsay, James, eds. Congress Resurgent: Foreign and Defense Policy on Capitol Hill. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodd, Lawrence C., and Schott, Richard. Congress and the Administrative State, 2nd ed. Boulder: Westview, 1994Google Scholar

Edwards, George C.At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989Google Scholar

Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharon. Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making Under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fenno, Richard F. Jr.Divided Government. New York: Allyn and Bacon, 1995Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P.Divided Government, 2nd ed. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon, 1996Google Scholar

Fisher, Louis. Congressional Abdication on War and Spending. College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2000Google Scholar

Fisher, Louis. Constitutional Conflicts Between Congress and the President, 4th ed. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1997Google Scholar

Fisher, Louis. The Constitution Between Friends: Congress, the President, and the Law. New York: St. Martin's, 1978Google Scholar

Fisher, Louis. The Politics of Shared Power: Congress and the Executive. College Station: Texas A&M Press, 1998Google Scholar

Foreman, Christopher J. Jr.Signals from the Hill: Congressional Oversight and the Challenge of Social Regulation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988Google Scholar

Gilmour, John B.Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hersman, Rebecca K. C.Friends and Foes: How Congress and the President Really Make Foreign Policy. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2000Google Scholar

Hinckley, Barbara. Less Than Meets the Eye: Foreign Policy Making and the Myth of the Assertive Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994Google Scholar

Jones, Charles O.Separate but Equal Branches: Congress and the Presidency, 2nd ed. New York: Chatham House, 1999Google Scholar

Kernell, Samuel. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1986Google Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindsay, James. Congress and the Politics of U.S. Foreign Policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994Google Scholar

Light, Paul. The President's Agenda. Rev. ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991Google Scholar

Lowenthal, Mark M.Intelligence: From Secrets to Policy. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1999Google Scholar

Mann, T., ed. A Question of Balance: The President, the Congress, and Foreign Policy. Washington: Brookings Institution, 1990Google Scholar

Mayer, Kenneth R.With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Mayhew, David. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigating: 1946–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan. “The Appointments Dilemma.” American Journal of Political Science 48, no. 3 (2004): 413–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mezey, Michael L.Congress, the President, and Public Policy. Boulder: Westview, 1989Google Scholar

Moe, Terry. “An Assessment of the Positive Theory of ‘Congressional Dominance.’” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12, no. 4 (1987): 475–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moe, Terry. “The Presidency and the Bureaucracy: The Presidential Advantage.” In The Presidency and the Political System, edited by Nelson, M., Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2003. 425–357Google Scholar

Neustadt, Richard E.Presidential Power. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1980Google Scholar

Peterson, Mark A.Legislating Together: The White House and Capitol Hill from Eisenhower to Reagan. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990Google Scholar

Spitzer, Robert J.President and Congress: Executive Hegemony at the Crossroads of American Government. New York: McGraw Hill, 1993Google Scholar

Thurber, Jamess, ed. Rivals for Power: Presidential-Congressional Relations. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1996Google Scholar

Wayne, Stephen J.The Legislative Presidency. New York: Harper, 1978Google Scholar

Wildavsky, Aaron. “The Two Presidencies.” In Perspectives on the Presidency, edited by Wildavsky, A.. Boston: Little, Brown, 1975Google Scholar

Websites:

White House and Executive Agencies. http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/

Abraham, Henry J.Justices, Presidents, and Senators: A History of the U.S. Supreme Court Appointments from Washington to Clinton. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999Google Scholar

Barnes, Jeb. Overruled?: Legislative Overrides, Pluralism, and Contemporary Court-Congress Relations. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004Google Scholar

Berger, Raoul. Congress v. The Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binder, Sarah, and Maltzman, Forrest. “The Limits of Senatorial Courtesy.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29, no. 1 (2004): 5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Charles, Cover, Albert, and Segal, Jeffrey. “Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees: A Neoinstitutional Model.” American Political Science Review 84, no. 2 (1990): 525–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carson, Jamie L, and Kleinerman, Benjamin A.. “A Switch in Time Saves Nine: Institutions, Strategic Actors, and FDR's Court-Packing Plan.” Public Choice 113 (2002): 301–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen Bell, Lauren. Warring Factions: Interest Groups, Money, and the New Politics of Senate Confirmation. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2002Google Scholar

Frickey, Philip, and Smith, Seven S.. “Judicial Review, the Congressional Process, and the Federalism Cases: An Interdisciplinary Critique.” The Yale Law Journal 111, no. 7 (2002): 1707–1756CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoekstra, Valerie J.Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katzmann, Robert A.Courts and Congress. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 1997Google Scholar

Lovell, George I.Legislative Deferrals: Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003Google Scholar

Maltzman, Forrest, Spriggs, James F., and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000Google Scholar

Moraski, Byron J., and Shipan, Charles R.. “The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices.” American Journal of Political Science 43, no. 4 (1999): 1069–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shipan, Charles R.Designing Judicial Review: Interest Groups, Congress, and Communications Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997Google Scholar

Solberg, Rorie L. Spill., and Heberlig, Eric S.. “Communicating to the Courts and Beyond: Why Members of Congress Participate in Amici Curiae.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29, no. 4 (2004): 591–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yalof, David. Pursuit of Justices: Presidential Politics and the Selection of Supreme Court Nominees. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999Google Scholar

Websites:

Supreme Court.http://www.supremecourtus.gov

Federal Court System. http://www.uscourts.gov/

Supreme Court Opinions. http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/supreme.html

Biersack, Robert, Herrnson, Paul, and Wilcox, Clyde, eds. After the Revolution: PACs, Lobbies, and the Republican Congress. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999Google Scholar

Austen-Smith, David, and Wright, John R.. “Counteractive Lobbying.” American Journal of Political Science 38, no. 1 (1994): 25–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austen-Smith, David, “Campaign Contributions and Access.” American Political Science Review 89, no. 3 (1995): 566–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Balla, Steven J., and Wright, John R.. “Interest Groups, Advisory Committees, and Congressional Control of the Bureaucracy,” American Journal of Political Science 45, no. 4 (2001): 799–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumgartner, Frank, and Leech, Beth, “The Multiple Ambiguities of ‘Counteractive Lobbying.’” American Journal of Political Science 40, no. 2 (1996): 521–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birnbaum, Jeffrey, and Murray, Alan S.. Showdown at Gucci Gulch: Lawmakers, Lobbyists, and the Unlikely Triumph of Tax Reform. New York: Random House, 1987Google Scholar

Caldeira, Greg, and Wright, John R., “Lobbying for Justice: Organized Interests, Supreme Court Nominations, and United States Senate.” American Journal of Political Science 42, no. 2 (1998): 499–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cater, Douglas. Power in Washington. New York: Random House, 1964Google Scholar

Cigler, Alan J., and Burdette A. Loomis, “Always Involved, Rarely Central: Organized Interests in American Politics.” In Interest Group Politics, 6th ed., edited by Cigler, Alan and Loomis, Burdette. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2002Google Scholar

Campbell, Colton, and Stack, John S. Jr., eds. Congress Confronts the Court: The Struggle for Legitimacy and Authority in Lawmaking. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001Google Scholar

Dexter, Lewis A.How Organizations Are Represented in Washington. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969Google Scholar

Hall, Richard L. and Wayman, F. W.. “Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees.” American Political Science Review 84, no. 3 (1990): 797–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, Susan W.Congressional Caucuses in National Policymaking. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997Google Scholar

Hansen, John Mark. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991Google Scholar

Heclo, Hugh. “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.” In The New American Political System, edited by King, Anthony. Washington: American Enterprise Institute Press, 1978Google Scholar

Hojnacki, Marie, and Kimball, David C.. “Organized Interests and the Decision of Whom to Lobby in Congress.” American Political Science Review 92, no. 4 (1998): 775–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cigler, Allan, and Loomis, Burdette, eds. Interest Group Politics, 6th ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2002Google Scholar

Loomis, B. and A. Cigler. “The Changing Nature of Interest Groups.” In Interest Group Politics, 6th ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2002

Lowi, Theodore J.The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton, 1979Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Mathew. “Who Controls? Information and the Structure of Legislative Decision Making.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19, no. 3 (1994): 361–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackenzie, G. C., with Hafken, Michael. Scandal Proof: Do Ethics Laws Make Government Ethical? Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2002Google Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew, and Schwartz, Thomas. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms.” American Journal of Political Science 28, no. 1 (1984): 59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCubbins, Mathew, Noll, Roger and Weingast, Barry. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 10, no. 2 (1987): 243–277Google Scholar

McCune, Wesley. The Farm Bloc. New York: Doubleday, Doran, and Company, 1943Google Scholar

Moe, Terry M. “Control and Feedback in Economic Regulation: The Case of the NLRB.” American Political Science Review 79, no. 4 (1985): 1094–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965Google Scholar

Ornstein, Norman, and Elder, Shirley. Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Policymaking. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1978Google Scholar

Salisbury, Robert H.et al. “Who You Know Versus What You Know: The Uses of Government Experience for Washington Lobbyists.” American Journal of Political Science 33, no. 1 (1989): 175–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salisbury, Robert H. “An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 13, no. 1 (1969): 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schlozman, Kay, and Tierney, John. Organized Interests and American Democracy, New York: Harper & Row, 1986Google Scholar

Shipan, Charles R.Designing Judicial Review: Interest Groups, Congress, and Communications Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000Google Scholar

Truman, David. The Governmental Process, 2nd ed. New York: Knopf, 1971Google Scholar

Walker, Jack L. Jr., Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, John R.Interest Groups and Congress: Lobbying, Contributions, and Influence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1996Google Scholar

Websites:

Federal Election Comission. http://www.fec.gov/

House Lobbying Disclosure. http://clerk.house.gov/pd/index.html

Senate Lobbying Disclosure. http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/legislative/g_three_sections_with_teasers/lobbyingdisc.htm

Krutz, Glen S.Hitching a Ride: Omnibus Legislating in the U.S. Congress. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2001Google Scholar

Palazzolo, Daniel J.Done Deal? The Politics of the 1997 Budget Agreement. New York: Chatham House, 1999Google Scholar

Rubin, Irene S.Balancing the Federal Budget. New York: Chatham House, 2003Google Scholar

Schick, Allen. Congress and Money. Washington: Urban Institute Press, 1980Google Scholar

Schick, Allen. The Federal Budget: Politics, Policy Process. Rev. ed. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2000Google Scholar

Sinclair, Barbara. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress, 2nd ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2000Google Scholar

Websites:

Congressional Budget Office. http://www.cbo.gov/

Office of Management and Budget. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/