Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T09:44:27.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Cusp–core dichotomy of elliptical galaxies: the role of thermal evaporation

from Part IV - Models and numerical simulations: methods and results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

Vincenzo Antonuccio-Delogu
Affiliation:
Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), Catania, Italy
Joseph Silk
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Introduction

There are two families of luminous elliptical galaxies: cusp galaxies and core galaxies. Cusp galaxies have steep power-law surface-brightness profiles down to the centre (hence the name ‘power-law’ galaxies, often used as a synonym for cusp galaxies), corresponding to intrinsic stellar density profiles with inner logarithmic slope γ > 0.5; core galaxies have surface-brightness profiles with a flat central core, corresponding to γ < 0.3 (Faber et al. 1997; Lauer et al. 2007). Cusp galaxies are relatively faint in optical, rotate rapidly, have disky isophotes, host radio-quiet active galactic nuclei (AGN) and do not contain large amounts of X-ray-emitting gas; core galaxies are brighter in the optical, rotate slowly, have boxy isophotes, radio-loud AGN and diffuse X-ray emission (for a summary of these observational findings see Nipoti and Binney 2007; Kormendy et al. 2009, and references therein). The most popular explanation for the origin of such a dichotomy is that cusp galaxies are produced in dissipative, gas-rich (‘wet’) mergers, while core galaxies are produced in dissipationless, gas-poor (‘dry’) mergers (Faber et al. 1997), the cores being a consequence of core scouring by binary supermassive black holes (Begelman et al. 1980). The actual role of galaxy merging in the formation of elliptical galaxies is still a matter of debate (e.g. Naab and Ostriker 2009). What is reasonably beyond doubt is that cores must be produced by dissipationless processes, while cusps are a signature of dissipation (Faber et al. 1997; Kormendy et al. 2009, and references therein).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×