Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Cited by 27
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: August 2009

13 - Hidden costs and disparate uncertainties: trade-offs in approaches to climate policy



As policy-makers struggle to define the policy agenda to address the challenge of climate change, three distinct influential approaches to climate policy are emerging in the climate change literature: implementing climate change adaptation; reducing social vulnerability; and managing ecosystem resilience. Each of these approaches has been developed in specific policy contexts associated respectively with natural hazard mitigation, poverty and social welfare investment, and natural resource management. In these contexts each approach has met with varying levels of past success. The fact that climate change is characterized by a high probability of surprise events; significant scientific uncertainty; and a need for long-term planning horizons only makes policy development more difficult.

In this chapter we argue that each of the three approaches involves implicit trade-offs in both the process of policy formation and in policy outcomes. These trade-offs are rarely considered in the evaluation of policy options, yet may have important implications for social welfare and sustainability. Through the analysis of case studies of adaptation to climate variability and change, we illustrate how the different ways of approaching the process of adjusting to future change can inadvertently lead to, for example, the privileging of efficiency over equitable distribution of resources (for example, risk-based adaptation approach), equity at the expense of cost (for example, social vulnerability approach), or intergenerational equity over political legitimacy (resilience approach).

In the next section, we first create caricatures of the three approaches to climate policy: risk-based adaptation, vulnerability and resilience.

Adger, W. N. 2006. ‘Vulnerability’, Global Environmental Change 16: 268–281.
Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Fairbrass, J., Jordan, A., Paavola, J., Rosendo, S. and Seyfang, G. 2003. ‘Governance for sustainability: towards a “Thick” understanding of environmental decision-making’, Environment and Planning A 35: 1095–1110.
Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W. and Tompkins, E. L. 2005. ‘Successful adaptation to climate change across scales’, Global Environmental Change 15: 77–86.
Anderies, J. M. 2005. ‘Minimal models and agroecological policy at the regional scale: an application to salinity problems in southeastern Australia’, Regional Environmental Change 5: 1–17.
Anderies, J. M. 2006. ‘Robustness, institutions and large-scale change in social–ecological systems: the Hohokam of the Phoenix Basin’, Journal of Institutional Economics 2: 133–155.
Anderies, J. M., Rodriguez, A. A., Janssen, M. A. and Cifdaloz, O. 2007. ‘Panaceas, uncertainty and the robust control framework in sustainability science’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 15 194–15 199.
Burton, I., Kates, R. W. and White, G. F. 1993. The Environment as Hazard. New York: Guilford.
Carpenter, S. R., and Brock, W. A. 2004. ‘Spatial complexity, resilience and policy diversity: fishing on lake-rich landscapes’, Ecology and Society 9: 8.
Defra, 2000. Climate Change: The UK Programme. London: Defra.
Eakin, H. and Lemos, M. C. 2006. ‘Adaptation and the state: Latin America and the challenge of capacity-building under globalization’, Global Environmental Change 16: 7–18.
Eakin, H. and Luers, A. 2006. ‘Assessing the vulnerability of social–environmental systems’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 365–394.
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S. and Walker, B. 2002. ‘Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations’, Ambio 31: 437–440.
Gunderson, L. H. 2001. ‘Managing surprising ecosystems in southern Florida’, Ecological Economics 37: 371–378.
Gunderson, L. H. 2003. ‘Adaptive dancing: interactions between social resilience and ecological crises’, in Berkes, F., Colding, J. and Folke, C. (eds.) Navigating Social–Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–52.
Gunderson, L. H. and Holling, C. S. (eds.) 2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Hewitt, K. 1983. ‘The idea of calamity in a technocratic age’, in Hewitt, K. (ed.) Interpretations of Calamity (Risks and Hazards). Winchester: Allen and Unwin, pp. 3–32.
Holling, C. 1973. ‘Resilience and stability of ecological systems’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 2–23.
,IPCC 2007. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M. and Miller, H. L. (eds.) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kates, R. W. and Clark, W. C. 1996. ‘Expecting the unexpected’, Environment 38: 6–18.
Liverman, D. M. 2001. ‘Vulnerability to global environmental change’, in Kasperson, J. X. and Kasperson, R. E. (eds.) Global Environmental Risk. Tokyo: United Nations University, pp. 201–216.
Markandya, A. and Halsnaes, K. 2001. ‘Costing methodologies’, in Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 451–498.
McKenzie-Hedger, M., Gawith, M., Brown, I., Connell, R. and Downing, T. E. (eds.) 2000. Climate Change: Assessing the Impacts – Identifying Responses. The First Three Years of the UK Climate Impacts Programme. Oxford: UKCIP and DETR.
McKenzie-Hedger, M., Connell, R. and Bramwell, P. 2006. ‘Bridging the gap: empowering decision-making for adaptation through the UK Climate Impacts Programme’, Climate Policy 6: 201–215.
Social, Ministério da Previdência. 2005. ‘Previdência e estabilidade social: curso formador em previdência social’, in Coleção Previdência Social. Brasília: Ministério da Previdência Social/Secretaria de Previdência Social, p. 125.
Mortimore, M. and Manvell, A. 2006. ‘Climate change: enhancing adaptive capacity’, in Nrsp, (ed.) NRSP Briefs. Hemel Hempstead: Natural Resources Systems Programme, p. 8.
Moss, R. H. and Schneider, S. H. 2000. ‘Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR: recommendations to lead authors for more consistent assessment and reporting’, in Pachauri, R., Taniguchi, T. and Tanaka, K. (eds.) Guidance Papers on the Cross-Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization, pp. 33–51
Nelson, D. R. and Finan, T. J. 2009. ‘Weak winters: dynamic decision making and extended drought in Ceará, Northeast Brazil’, in Jones, E. C. and Murphy, A. D. (eds.) The Political Economy of Hazards and Disasters. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N. and Brown, K. 2007. ‘Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32: 395–420.
O'Brien, K. L. and Leichenko, R. M. 2003. ‘Winners and losers in the context of global change’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93: 89–103.
O'Brien, K., Eriksen, S., Schjolden, A. and Nygaard, L. P. 2004. What's in a Word? Conflicting Interpretations of Vulnerability in Climate Change Research, Working Paper No. 2004:04. Oslo: CICERO.
Paavola, J. and Adger, W. N. 2006. ‘Fair adaptation to climate change’, Ecological Economics 56: 594–609.
Perrings, C. 2007. ‘Future challenges’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104: 15 179–15 180.
,Pew Research Foundation. 2007. World Publics Welcome Global Trade – But not Immigration, Global Attitudes Project Report. Washington, DC: Pew Research Foundation.
Redman, C. L. 1999. Human Impact on Ancient Environments. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Sarewitz, D., Pielke Jr, R. and Keykhah, M. 2003. ‘Vulnerability and risk: some thoughts from a political and policy perspective’, Risk Analysis 23: 805–810.
Simms, A. 2005. Africa: Up in Smoke? The 2nd report from the Working Group on Climate Change and Development. London: New Economics Foundation and International Institute for Environment and Development.
Smit, B. and Wandel, J. 2006. ‘Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability’, Global Environmental Change 16: 282–292.
Sperling, F. (ed.) 2003. Poverty and Climate Change: Reducing the Vulnerability of the Poor through Adaptation. London: World Bank and Department for International Development.
Timmerman, P. 1986. ‘Nature myths and how systems cope (or fail to cope) with surprise’, in Clark, W. C. and Munn, R. E. (eds.) Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 445–449.
Tompkins, E. L. and Adger, W. N. 2004. ‘Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change?’, Ecology and Society 9: 10.
,United Nations 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations.
Vogel, C. and O'Brien, K. L. 2004. ‘Vulnerability and global environmental change: Rhetoric and reality’, Aviso: An Information Bulletin on Global Environmental Change and Human Security 1: 1–8.
Walker, B., Gunderson, L. H., Kinzig, A., Folke, C. and Schultz, L. 2006. ‘A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social–ecological systems’, Ecology and Society 11: 13.
West, C. C., and Gawith, M. J. (eds.) 2005. Measuring Progress: Preparing for Climate Change through the UK Climate Impacts Programme. Oxford: UKCIP.
White, G. F. 1986. ‘Human adjustment to floods’, in Kates, R. and Burton, I. (eds.) Geography Resources and Environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 11–25.
Willows, R. and Connell, R. (eds.) 2003. Climate Adaptation: Risk, Uncertainty and Decision-Making. Oxford: UKCIP.
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T. and Davis, I. 2004. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disasters. London: Routledge.