Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-kpmwg Total loading time: 0.739 Render date: 2021-12-05T22:03:26.798Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

1 - Methodological Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2019

Markus Vinzent
King's College London
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Writing the History of Early Christianity
From Reception to Retrospection
, pp. 5 - 76
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Aguirre Rojas, Carlos Antonio. 2004. Die ‘Schule’ der Annales gestern, heute, morgen (Leipziger University Press: Leipzig).Google Scholar
Aldiss, Brian W. 1967. An Age (Faber: London).Google Scholar
Aldiss, Brian W. 1979. Cryptozoic (Panther: London).Google Scholar
Amis, Martin. 1991. Time’s Arrow, or The Nature of the Offence (Penguin Books: London).Google Scholar
Andresen, Carl, Ritter, Adolf Martin and Seebaß, Gottfried. 1995. Geschichte des Christentums (Kohlhammer: Stuttgart [u.a.]).Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2012. The Green Guide: Washington, DC (Michelin: Greenville, SC).Google Scholar
Ashplant, T.G. and Wilson, Adrian. 1988. ‘Present-centred history and the problem of historical knowledge’, The Historical Journal, 31: 253–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, Karl. 1928. Die Theologie und die Kirche (Kaiser: München).Google Scholar
Barton, Carlin A. and Boyarin, Daniel. 2016. Imagine No Religion: How Modern Abstractions Hide Ancient Realities (Fordham University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Basch, Rivka. 2011. ‘Zwischen Tradition und Revolution: Die Exegese von Hugo von St. Viktor und Rabbi Schemuel Ben Meir (“Raschbam”)’ in Bauer, Dieter R. and Köpf, Ulrich (eds.), Kulturkontakte und Rezeptionsvorgänge in der Theologie des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts (Aschendorff Verlag: Münster).Google Scholar
Batovici, Dan and de Troyer, Kristin (eds.). 2016. Authoritative Texts and Reception History: Aspects and Approaches, Biblical Interpretation Series, 151 (Brill: Leiden).Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1995. The Gulf War Did Not Take Place (Indiana University Press: Bloomington).Google Scholar
Bauer, Dieter R. 2000. Hagiographie im Kontext: Wirkungsweisen und Möglichkeiten historischer Auswertung (Steiner: Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity (Polity Press: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2005. Liquid Life (Polity Press: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Becker, Eve-Marie. 2005. Die antike Historiographie und die Anfänge der christlichen Geschichtsschreibung (de Gruyter: Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belting, Hans. 1987. The End of the History of Art? (University of Chicago Press: Chicago).Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter and Tiedemann, Rolf. 1999. The Arcades Project (Belknap Press: Cambridge, MA [u.a.]).Google Scholar
Bennett, Tony and Joyce, Patrick. 2010. Material Powers: Cultural Studies, History and the Material Turn (Routledge: London).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. 2008. ‘The conversation that never happened (Gadamer/Derrida)’, The Review of Metaphysics, 61: 577603.Google Scholar
Binmore, K.G. 1994. Game Theory and the Social Contract (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Binmore, K.G. 1998. Just Playing (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Boyd, Jennifer. 1993. Frank Norris: Spatial Form and Narrative Time (P. Lang: New York).Google Scholar
Branzi, Andrea. 1988. Learning from Milan: Design and the Second Modernity (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Branzi, Andrea. 2006a. ‘Postface’ in Branzi, A. (ed.), No-Stop City: Archizoom Associati (Editions HYX: Le Plessis-Robinson).Google Scholar
Branzi, Andrea. 2006b. Weak and Diffuse Modernity: The World of Projects at the Beginning of the 21st Century (Skira: Milan).Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. 1977. Afterthoughts on Material Civilization and Capitalism (Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore).Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand and Reynolds, Sian. 2002. Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century (Phoenix: London).Google Scholar
Breed, Brennan W. 2014. Nomadic Text: A Theory of Biblical Reception History (Indiana University Press: Indianapolis).Google Scholar
Bremmer, Jan N., Dijkstra, Jitse H.F., Kroesen, J.E.A. and Kuiper, Y.. 2010. Myths, Martyrs, and Modernity: Studies in the History of Religions in Honour of Jan N. Bremmer (Brill: Leiden).Google Scholar
Brent, Allen. 1999. The Imperial Cult and the Development of Church Order: Concepts and Images of Authority in Paganism and Early Christianity Before the Age of Cyprian (Brill: Boston).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brent, Allen. 2007. ‘Ignatius’ Pagan background in second century Asia Minor’, Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum, 10: 207–32.Google Scholar
Brent, Allen. 2009. Ignatius of Antioch: A Martyr Bishop and the Origin of Monarchial Episcopacy (T & T Clark: London).Google Scholar
Browning, Gary K. 2000. Lyotard and the End of Grand Narratives (University of Wales Press: Cardiff).Google Scholar
Buckland, Warren. 2009. Puzzle Films Complex Storytelling in Contemporary Cinema (Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester [u.a.]).Google Scholar
Bulgakowa, Oksana. 2008. ‘The ear against the eye: Vertov’s symphony’, Kieler Beiträge zur Filmmusikforschung, 2: 142–58.Google Scholar
Burgess, R.W. and Kulikowski, Michael. 2013. Mosaics of Time: The Latin Chronicle Traditions from the First Century BC to the Sixth Century AD (Brepols: Turnhout).Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. 1990. The French Historical Revolution: The Annales School, 1929–89 (Polity: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert. 1931. The Whig Interpretation of History (Bell: [S.l.]).Google Scholar
Cameron, Averil. 1999. ‘Remaking the past’ in Bowersock, Glen (ed.), Late Antiquity. A Guide to the Postclassical World (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Canzler, Weert, Kaufmann, Vincent and Kesselring, Sven. 2008. Tracing Mobilities: Towards a Cosmopolitan Perspective (Ashgate: Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT).Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de. 1974. ‘L’opération historique’ in Le Goff, Jacques and Nora, Pierre (eds.), Faire de l’histoire. Nouveaux problèmes (Gallimard: Paris).Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de and Conley, Tom. 1988. The Writing of History (Columbia University Press: New York; Guildford).Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. 1988. Cultural History: Between Practices and Representations (Polity in association with Blackwell: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. 1989. ‘Texts, printing, readings’ in Hunt, Lynn (ed.), The New Cultural History (University of California Press: Berkeley).Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. 1994. The Order of Books: Readers, Authors and Libraries in Europe between the Fourteenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Polity: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. 1995a. Forms and Meanings: Text, Performances, and Audience from Codex to Computer (University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartier, Roger. 1995b. ‘L’Histoire Culturelle entre “Linguistic Turn” et “Retour au sujet”’ in Lehmann, Hartmut (ed.), Wege einer neuen Kulturgeschichte (Göttingen), 2958.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. 1997. On the Edge of the Cliff: History, Language, and Practices (Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore).Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. 2005. Inscrire et effacer: culture écrite et littérature, XIe-XVIIIe siècle (Gallimard: Paris).Google Scholar
Chiesa, Laura. 2016. Space as Storyteller: Spatial Jumps in Architecture, Critical Theory, and Literature (Northwestern University Press: Evanston, IL).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, Catherine. 2017. ‘Marvelous things heard: On finding historical radiance’, The Massachusetts Review, 58: 478–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, Catherine M. and Vidas, Moulie (eds.). 2015. Late Ancient Knowing: Explorations in Intellectual History (University of California Press: Oakland).Google Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth A. 2004. History, Theory, Text: Historians and the Linguistic Turn (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Clark, Gillian. 2013. ‘60 Years (1951–2011) of the International Conference on Patristic Studies at Oxford: Key figures’, Studia Patristica, 53: 34.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R.G. and van der Dussen, W.J.. 1993. The Idea of History: With Lectures 1926–1928 (Clarendon Press: Oxford).Google Scholar
Condé, Larry. 2001. The End of History (Writers Club Press: San Jose).Google Scholar
Cumberland, Richard. 1811. Retrospection: A Poem in Familiar Verse (The Author: London).Google Scholar
Currie, Mark. 2007. About Time: Narrative, Fiction and the Philosophy of Time (Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh).Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur Coleman. 1965. Analytical Philosophy of History (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur Coleman. 1968. Analytical Philosophy of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur Coleman. 1985. Narration and Knowledge: Including the Integral Text of Analytical Philosophy of History (Columbia University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur Coleman. 1997. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
Daughrity, Dyron B. 2012. Church History: Five Approaches to a Global Discipline (P. Lang: New York).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1967a. De la grammatologie (Les Editions de Minuit: Paris).Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1967b. L’écriture et la différence (Éditions du Seuil: Paris).Google Scholar
Dick, Philip K. 1967. Counter-Clock World (Vintage Books: New York).Google Scholar
Didi-Huberman, Georges. 2000. Devant le temps. Histoire de l’art et anachronisme des images (Ed. de Minuit: Paris).Google Scholar
DiTommaso, Lorenzo and Kannengiesser, Charles. 2008. The Reception and Interpretation of the Bible in Late Antiquity. Proceedings of the Montréal Colloquium in Honour of Charles Kannengiesser, 11–13 October 2006 (Brill: Leiden).Google Scholar
Dreyer, Mechthild. 2011. ‘… sequemur Aristotelem, non omittentes ea, quae ex aliis et ex nobis utiliter videbuntur esse addenda. Zur Aristoteles-Rezeption von Albertus Magnus’ in Bauer, Dieter R. and Köpf, Ulrich (eds.), Kulturkontakte und Rezeptionsvorgänge in der Theologie des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts (Aschendorff Verlag: Münster).Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark and Vinzent, Markus. 2013. ‘J.N.D. Kelly’, Studia Patristica, 53: 4354.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Sergei. 2004. Problems of Film Direction (University Press of the Pacific: Honolulu, Hawaii).Google Scholar
Elliott, Mark W. 2012. ‘The promise and threat of Reception, with reference to patristic interpretation of texts in Hebrews and Ephesians’. Scholar
Erlich, Victor. 1973. ‘Russian formalism’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 34: 627–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espagne, Michel and Werner, Michael. 1985. ‘Deutsch-Französischer Kulturtransfer im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert. Zu einem interdisziplinären Forschungsprogramm des C.N.R.S.’, Francia, 13: 502–10.Google Scholar
Evans, Craig A. 2012. The Book of Genesis. Composition, Reception, and Interpretation (Brill: Leiden [u.a.]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Robert. 2016. Reception History, Tradition and Biblical Interpretation. Gadamer and Jauss in Current Practice (Bloomsbury: London).Google Scholar
Falcon, Andrea (ed.). 2016. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity (Brill: Leiden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitschen, Klaus. 2004. ‘Aktuelle Methodendebatten in der protestantischen Kirchengeschichtsschreibung’ in Kinzig, Wolfram, Leppin, Volker and Wartenberg, Günther (eds.), Historiographie und Theologie. Kirchen- und Theologiegeschichte im Spannungsfeld von geschichtswissenschaftlicher Methode und theologischem Anspruch (Evangelische Verlagsanstalt: Leipzig), 3952.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man (Free Press: New York; Maxwell Macmillan Canada: Toronto).Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2006. The End of History and the Last Man (Free Press: New York).Google Scholar
Fulbrook, Mary. 2002. Historical Theory (Routledge: London [u.a.]).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. 2004. Truth and Method (Continuum: London).Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine and Greenblatt, Stephen J.. 2000. Practicing New Historicism (University of Chicago Press: Chicago).Google Scholar
Gavetti, Giovanni and Levinthal, Daniel. 2000. ‘Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 113–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebser, Jean. 1975–[1980]. Gesamtausgabe (Schaffhausen: Noralis).Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. 1997. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree (University of Nebraska Press: Lincoln).Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd P. (ed.). 2010. The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Glancy, Jennifer A. 2010. Corporal Knowledge: Early Christian Bodies (Oxford University Press: Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Philip and Machor, James L.. 2008. New Directions in American Reception Study (Oxford University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Gomel, Elana. 2010. Postmodern Science Fiction and Temporal Imagination (Continuum: London).Google Scholar
Goody, Jack. 2012. The Theft of History (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge [u.a.]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graumann, Thomas. 2002. Die Kirche der Väter Vätertheologie und Väterbeweis in den Kirchen des Ostens bis zum Konzil von Ephesus (431) (Mohr Siebeck: Tübingen).Google Scholar
Green, Anna. 2005. The Houses of History: A Critical Reader in Twentieth-Century History and Theory (Manchester University Press: Manchester).Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1988. Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (University of California Press: Berkeley).Google Scholar
Guignon, Charles. 2005. ‘The history of being’ in Wrathall, Mark A. and Dreyfus, Hubert L. (eds.), A Companion to Heidegger (Blackwell Publishing: Malden, Oxford), 392406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwatkin, Henry Melvill. 1909. Early Church History to A.D. 313 in Two Volumes (Macmillan: London).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. Die neue Unübersichtlichkeit: kleine politische Schriften V (Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main).Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1980. ‘Encoding/Decoding’ in Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (ed.), Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79 (Hutchinson: London), 128–38.Google Scholar
Hanley, Richard. 2009. ‘Memento and personal identity: Do we have it backwards?’ in Kania, Andrew (ed.), Memento (Routledge: London, New York), 107–25.Google Scholar
Hanson, Ellis. 2016. ‘Kink in Time’, b2o: An online journal. Scholar
Harnack, Adolf von. 1894. Zur Überlieferungsgeschichte der altchristlichen Literatur von Adolf Harnack (Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur, XII, 1, [2]) (Hinrichs: Leipzig).Google Scholar
Harris, Horton. 1990. The Tübingen School: A Historical and Theological Investigation of the School of F.C. Baur (Apollos: Leicester).Google Scholar
Harris, W.V. 2005. ‘Morris Keith Hopkins’ in Marshall, P.J. (ed.), Biographical Memoirs of Fellows (Oxford University Press: Oxford), 327.Google Scholar
Harsanyi, John C. and Selten, Reinhard. 1988. A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Harvey, Susan Ashbrook and Hunter, David G.. 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Early Christian Studies (Oxford University Press: Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1889 (1784). ‘Von der Annehmlichkeit, Nützlichkeit und Nothwendigkeit der Geographie’ in Gottfried Herder, Johann (ed.), Sämmtliche Werke, ed. Bernhard Suphan (Weidmann: Berlin), 96110.Google Scholar
Heussi, Karl. 1932. Die Krisis des Historismus (Mohr: Tübingen).Google Scholar
Hodgson, Peter Crafts. 1966. The Formation of Historical Theology: A Study of Ferdinand Christian Baur (Harper & Row: New York).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Keith. 1998. ‘Christian numbers and its implications’, Journal of Early Christian Studies, 6: 185226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, Keith. 1999. A World Full of Gods: Pagans, Jews, and Christians in the Roman Empire (Weidenfeld & Nicolson: London).Google Scholar
Hull, David L. 1979. ‘In defense of presentism’, History and Theory, 18: 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Lynn. 1992. The Family Romance of the French Revolution (Routledge: London).Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn and Biersack, Aletta. 1989. The New Cultural History (University of California Press: Berkeley; London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichijo, Atsuko and Spohn, Willfried. 2005. Entangled Identities: Nations and Europe (Ashgate: Aldershot).Google Scholar
Iggers, Georg G. 1984. New Directions in European Historiography (Wesleyan University Press: Middletown, CN).Google Scholar
Iggers, Georg G. 1995. ‘Zur “linguistischen Wende” im Geschichtsdenken und in der Geschichtsschreibung’, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 21: 557–70.Google Scholar
Iggers, Georg G. 2005. Historiography in the Twentieth Century from Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge (Wesleyan University Press: [Middletown, CN]).Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. 1974. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett (Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore).Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. 1978. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response (Routledge and Kegan Paul: London).Google Scholar
Jakaitis, Jake. 1995. ‘Two cases of conscience: Loyalty and race in The Crack in Space and Counter-Clock World’ in Umland, Samuel J. (ed.), Philip K. Dick: Contemporary Critical Interpretations (Greenwood Press: Westport, CT), 169–95.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nick. 2000. ‘Uses and abuses of anachronism in the history of the sciences’, History of Science 38, 38: 251–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert and Ed Hays, Michael. 1989. Question and Answer: Forms of Dialogic Understanding (University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis).Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1980. Praktische Intersubjektivität die Entwicklung des Werkes von George Herbert Mead (Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main).Google Scholar
Kania, Andrew. 2009. Memento (Routledge: New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapell, Matthew and McVeigh, Stephen. 2011. The Films of James Cameron: Critical Essays (McFarland: Jefferson, NC).Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren and Auden, W.H.. 1999. The Living Thoughts of Kierkegaard (New York Review Books: New York).Google Scholar
Kinzig, Wolfram. 1994. Novitas Christiana: Die Idee des Fortschritts in der Alten Kirche bis Eusebius (Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht: Göttingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzig, Wolfram. 2004. Historiographie und Theologie: Kirchen- und Theologiegeschichte im Spannungsfeld von geschichtswissenschaftlicher Methode und theologischem Anspruch (Evangelische Verlagsanstalt: Leipzig).Google Scholar
Kinzig, Wolfram and Hays, Christopher M.. 2017. Faith in Formulae: A Collection of Early Christian Creeds and Creed-Related Texts (Oxford University Press: Oxford).Google Scholar
Klarer, Mario. 2004. An Introduction to Literary Studies (Routledge: London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köpf, Ulrich. 2011. ‘Rezeption in der Theologiegeschichte. Einleitende Bemerkungen’ in Köpf, Ulrich and Bauer, Dieter R. (eds.), Kulturkontakte und Rezeptionsvorgänge in der Theologie des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts (Aschendorff: Münster), 116.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2004. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time (Columbia University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart and Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2000. Zeitschichten: Studien zur Historik (Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main).Google Scholar
Kracauer, Siegfried. 1969. History: The Last Things before the Last (Oxford University Press: Oxford).Google Scholar
Kubler, George. 1945. ‘Henri Focillon, 1881–1943’, College Art Journal, 4: 71–4.Google Scholar
Kubler, George Alexander. 1962. The Shape of Time: Remarks on the History of Things (Yale University Press: New Haven).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. and Hacking, Ian. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press: Chicago).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern (Harvester Wheatsheaf: New York; London).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2001. ‘Progress or entanglement? Two models for the long term evolution of human civilization’ in Tien, H. and Lo, C. (eds.), Challenges of Civilization in the 21st Century (Institute for National Policy Research: Taiwan), 311–34.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004. ‘Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern’, Critical Inquiry, 30: 224–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford University Press: Oxford).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2007a. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (Oxford University Press: Oxford).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2007b. ‘The recall of modernity: Anthropological approaches’, Cultural Studies Review, 13: 1130.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2010. On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods (Duke University Press: Durham, NC).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno and Woolgar, Steve. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Sage: Beverly Hills).Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1955. ‘The structural study of myth’, The Journal of American Folklore, 68: 428–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Caroline. 2016. ‘Historicism: From the Break to the Loop’, b2o. Scholar
Levine, Joseph. 2009. ‘Leonard’s system: Why doesn’t it work?’ in Kania, Andrew (ed.), Memento (Routledge: London): 4564.Google Scholar
Lieb, Michael, Mason, Emma and Roberts, Jonathan. 2010. The Oxford Handbook of the Reception History of the Bible (Oxford University Press: Oxford).Google Scholar
Lietzmann, Hans. 1932. Geschichte der alten Kirche (Walter de Gruyter: Berlin).Google Scholar
Lietzmann, Hans. 1936. Geschichte der alten Kirche (Walter de Gruyter: Berlin).Google Scholar
Lietzmann, Hans. 1938. Geschichte der alten Kirche (Walter de Gruyter: Berlin).Google Scholar
Lietzmann, Hans. 1944. Geschichte der alten Kirche (Walter de Gruyter: Berlin).Google Scholar
Lieu, Judith M. 2015. Marcion and the Making of a Heretic: God and Scripture in the Second Century (Cambridge University Press: New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsey, Byron. 1988. ‘On the Strugackij brothers’ contemporary fairytale Monday Begins on Saturday’ in Mandelker, Amy (ed.), The Supernatural in Russian Literature (Slavica Publishers: Columbus, OH), 290302.Google Scholar
Lipsitz, George. 2006. The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit from Identity Politics (Temple University Press: Philadelphia).Google Scholar
Looser, Devoney. 2000. British Women Writers and the Writing of History, 1670–1820 (Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore).Google Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1940. ‘Reflections on the history of ideas’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 1: 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1960. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea (Harper Torchbooks: [S.l.]).Google Scholar
Lüsebrink, Hans Jürgen and Reichardt, Rolf (eds.). 1997. Kulturtransfer im Epochenumbruch. Frankreich-Deutschland 1770–1815 (Leipzig).Google Scholar
Luz, Ulrich. 2006. ‘The contribution of reception history to a theology of the New Testament’ in Christopher, Tuckett and Christopher, Rowland (eds.), The Nature of New Testament Theology. Essays in Honour of Robert Morgan (Blackwell: Oxford), 122–34.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François, Bennington, Geoffrey, Massumi, Brian and Jameson, Fredric. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (Manchester University Press: Manchester).Google Scholar
Machor, James L. and Goldstein, Philip. 2001. Reception Study: From Literary Theory to Cultural Studies (Routledge: New York).Google Scholar
Mahnkopf, Claus-Steffen, Cox, Frank and Schurig, Wolfram. 2008. Facets of the Second Modernity (Wolke: Hofheim).Google Scholar
Mailloux, Steven. 1998. Reception Histories: Rhetoric, Pragmatism, and American Cultural Politics (Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelkern, Michael. 1981. ‘Hester Lynch [Thrale] Piozzi’ in Dictionary of Literary Biography (Gale Research: Detroit), 241–60.Google Scholar
Marcus, Joel. 2006. ‘Jewish Christianity’ in Young, Frances M. and Mitchell, Margaret M. (eds.), Origins to Constantine (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge), 87102.Google Scholar
Marius, Richard and Page, Melvin E.. 2010. A Short Guide to Writing about History (Longman: London).Google Scholar
Markschies, Christoph. 2002. Zwischen Altertumswissenschaft und Theologie zur Relevanz der Patristik in Geschichte und Gegenwart (Peeters: Leuven).Google Scholar
Markschies, Christoph. 2009. Kaiserzeitliche christliche Theologie und ihre Institutionen. Prolegomena zu einer Geschichte der antiken christlichen Theologie (Mohr Siebeck: Tübingen).Google Scholar
Markschies, Christoph. 2012. Das antike Christentum: Frömmigkeit, Lebensformen, Institutionen (C.H. Beck: München).Google Scholar
Martin, Andrew M. 2013. Archaeology beyond Postmodernity: A Science of the Social (AltaMira Press: Lanham a.o.).Google Scholar
Martin, Bauspiess, Landmesser, Christof and Lincicum, David. 2017. Ferdinand Christian Baur and the History of Early Christianity (Oxford University Press: Oxford).Google Scholar
Mayeur, Jean-Marie, Piétri, Charles, Pietri, Luce, Vauchez, André and Venard, Marc. 1996ff. Die Geschichte des Christentums Religion – Politik – Kultur (Herder: Freiburg Basel Wien).Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. 1990. ‘When is historiography Whiggish?’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 51: 301–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, William. 1985. Hester Thrale Piozzi: Portrait of a Literary Woman (University of North Carolina Press: Chapel Hill).Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome J. 1985. The Beauty of Inflections: Literary Investigations in Historical Method and Theory (Clarendon: Oxford).Google Scholar
McGee, Patrick. 2012. Bad History and the Logics of Blockbuster Cinema: Titanic, Gangs of New York, Australia, Inglourious Basterds (Palgrave Macmillan: New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, Alister E. 2013. Christian History. An Introduction (John Wiley & Sons: Chichester).Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1980 (1st ed. 1932). Philosophy of the Present. With Prefatory Remarks by John Dewey (The University of Chicago Press (1st. ed. Open Court Pub Co Chicago, 1932): Chicago).Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert and Edward Murphy, Arthur. 1932. The Philosophy of the Present … Edited by Arthur E. Murphy, etc. (Open Court Publishing Co.: Chicago).Google Scholar
Meier, Mischa. 2004. ‘Prokop, Agathias, die Pest und das “Ende” der antiken Historiographie. Naturkatastrophen und Geschichtsschreibung in der ausgehenden Spätantike’, Historische Zeitschrift, 278: 281310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinhold, Peter. 1967. Geschichte der kirchlichen Historiographie (Alber: Freiburg im Breisgau).Google Scholar
Merkt, Andreas, Nicklas, Tobias and Verheyden, Joseph. 2015. ‘Das Novum Testamentum Patristicum (NTP): Ein Projekt zur Erforschung von Rezeption und Auslegung des Neuen Testaments in frühchristlicher und spätantiker Zeit’, Early Christianity, 6: 573–95.Google Scholar
Merrin, William. 1994. ‘Uncritical criticism? Norris, Baudrillard and the Gulf War’, Economy and Society, 23: 433–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelfelder, Diane P. and Palmer, Richard E.. 1989. Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer–Derrida Encounter (State University of New York Press: Albany).Google Scholar
Middleton, Peter and Woods, Tim. 2004. ‘Textual memory: The making of the Titanic’s archive’ in Street, Sarah and Bergfelder, Tim (eds.), The Titanic in Myth and Memory: Representations in Visual and Literary Culture (I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd: London), 6372.Google Scholar
Miller, J. Hillis. 1992. Ariadne’s Thread: Story Lines (Yale University Press: Yale).Google Scholar
Miller, Patricia Cox. 2009. The Corporeal Imagination: Signifying the Holy in Late Ancient Christianity (University of Pennsylvania Press: Philadelphia).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Sidney W. 1986. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History (Penguin Books: New York).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret Mary, Young, Frances M. and Scott Bowie, K.. 2006. Origins to Constantine (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Moore, Brenna. 2012. ‘How to awaken the dead: Michel de Certeau, Henri de Lubac, and the instabilities between the past and the present’, Spiritus: A Journal of Christian Spirituality, 12: 172–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, Neville. 1999. Writing Ancient History (Duckworth: London).Google Scholar
Muehlberger, E. 2017. ‘Theological anthropology and medicine: Questions and directions for research’, Studia Patristica, 81: 3749.Google Scholar
Muhlack, Ulrich. 2004. ‘Theorie der Geschichte. Schwerpunkte in der gegenwärtigen Diskussion der Geschichtswissenschaften’ in Kinzig, Wolfram, Leppin, Volker and Wartenberg, Günther (eds.), Historiographie und Theologie. Kirchen- und Theologiegeschichte im Spannungsfeld von geschichtswissenschaftlicher Methode und theologischem Anspruch (Evangelische Verlagsanstalt: Leipzig), 1937.Google Scholar
Muldoon, Mark. 2006. Tricks of Time: Bergson, Merleau-Ponty and Ricoeur in Search of Time, Self and Meaning (Duquesne University Press: Lancaster).Google Scholar
Mulsow, Martin. (unpublished). ‘Ideengeschichte als Verflechtungsgeschichte. Impulse für eine Global Intellectual History’ in Mulsow, Martin (ed.), Überreichweiten. Bausteine einer globalen Ideengeschichte.Google Scholar
Nemo, Hartmut. 2000. ‘Letter to Keith Hopkins’, Zeitschrift für Antikes Christentum, 4: 219–24.Google Scholar
Neumann, Birgit and Nünning, Ansgar. 2008. An Introduction to the Study of Narrative Fiction (Klett Lernen und Wissen: Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Norris, Christopher. 1992. Uncritical Theory: Postmodernism, Intellectuals and the Gulf War (Lawrence & Wishart: London).Google Scholar
Nuffelen, Peter van. 2017. ‘The poetics of Christian history in late antiquity’, Studia Patristica, 92: 227–46.Google Scholar
Olbromski, Cezary Jozef. 2011. ‘Social connotations in the category of the “now” in the late writings of Edmund Husserl vs. J. Derrida and B. Waldenfels’ in Tymieniecka, Anna-Teresa (ed.), Phenomenology/Ontopoiesis. Retrieving Geo-cosmic Horizons of Antiquity. Logos and Life (Springer: Dordrecht), 251–67.Google Scholar
Pandel, Hans-Jürgen. 1990. Historik und Didaktik. Das Problem der Distribution historiographisch erzeugten Wissens in der deutschen Geschichtswissenschaft von der Spätaufklärung zum Frühhistorismus (1765–1830) (Frommann-Holzboog: Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt).Google Scholar
Parisi, Paula. 1998. Titanic and the Making of James Cameron: The Inside Story of the Three-Year Adventure that Rewrote Motion Picture History (Orion Media: London).Google Scholar
Parker, D.C. 1997. The Living Text of the Gospels (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pieper, Josef and Bullock, Michael. 1954. The End of Time. A Meditation on the Philosophy of History. Translated by Michael Bullock (Faber & Faber: London).Google Scholar
Pilhofer, Peter. 1990. Presbyteron kreitton: der Altersbeweis der jüdischen und christlichen Apologeten und seine Vorgeschichte (J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck): Tübingen).Google Scholar
Pilkington, Ace G. 2011. ‘Fighting the history wars on the big screen: From The Terminator to Avatar’ in McVeigh, Stephen and Kapell, Matthew Wilhelm (eds.), The Films of James Cameron: Critical Essays (McFarland & Company: Jefferson), 4471.Google Scholar
Pomian, Krzysztof. 1984. L’ordre du temps (Gallimard: Paris).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, James I. 2003. ‘Why Homer? Why now?’, University of Michigan LSA Magazine, Spring: 38–9.Google Scholar
Presley, Stephen O. 2015. The Intertextual Reception of Genesis 1–3 in Irenaeus of Lyons (Brill: Leiden).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prudovsky, Gad. 1997. ‘Can we ascribe to past thinkers concepts: They had no linguistic means to express?’, History and Theory, 36: 1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiche, Claudia. 2015. ‘Dziga Vertovs mediale Epistemologie des Intervalls’, Internationales Jahrbuch für Medienphilosophie, 1: 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. 1974. Geschichte und Wahrheit (List: München).Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. 1984. Time and Narrative (University of Chicago Press: Chicago).Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. 1985. Time and Narrative (University of Chicago Press: Chicago).Google Scholar
Ricœur, Paul. 1988. Time and Narrative (University of Chicago Press: Chicago).Google Scholar
Rosa, Hartmut. 2016. Resonanz: eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung (Suhrkamp: Berlin).Google Scholar
Ruh, Kurt. 1985. Ueberlieferungsgeschichtliche Prosaforschung Beiträge der Würzburger Forschergruppe zur Methode und Auswertung (Niemeyer: Tübingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, Jörg. 2013. The Individual in the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean (Oxford University Press: Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüpke, Jörg and Richardson, David M.B.. 2016. Religious Deviance in the Roman World: Superstition or Individuality? (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüsen, Jörn. 2004. ‘Faktizität und Fiktionalität der Geschichte – Was ist Wirklichkeit im historischen Denken?’ in Eddelbüttel, Antje and Schröter, Jens (eds.), Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. Beiträge aus geschichtstheoretischer, philosophischer und theologischer Perspektive (Walter de Gruyter: Berlin), 1932.Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2009. Avatars of Story (University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis [u.a.]).Google Scholar
Sandler, Kevin S. and Studlar, Gaylyn. 1999. Titanic: Anatomy of a Blockbuster (Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, NJ).Google Scholar
Schenk, Sabine. 2013. Running and Clicking Future Narratives in Film (De Gruyter: Berlin Boston).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöttler, Peter. 1997. ‘Wer hat Angst vor dem “linguistic turn”?’, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 23: 134–51.Google Scholar
Schöttler, Peter. 1999. Geschichtsschreibung als Legitimationswissenschaft 1918 – 1945 (Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main).Google Scholar
Schöttler, Peter. (ed.). 2015. Die ‘Annales’-Historiker und die deutsche Geschichtswissenschaft (Mohr Siebeck: Tübingen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schöttler, Peter. 2018a. ‘Die frühen “Annales” und der Übergang von der “historischen” zur “strukturalen” Linguistik’ in Schöttler, Peter (ed.), Nach der Angst. Geschichtswissenschaft vor und nach dem “linguistic turn” (Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot: Münster), 160–70.Google Scholar
Schöttler, Peter. 2018b. ‘Wer hat Angst vor dem ‘linguistic turn’? Ein Diskussionsbeitrag’ in Schöttler, Peter (ed.), Nach der Angst. Geschichtswissenschaft vor und nach dem “linguistic turn” (Verlag Westfälisches Dampfboot: Münster), 120–39.Google Scholar
Schröter, Jens. 2004. ‘Konstruktion von Geschichte und die Anfänge des Christentums: Reflexionen zur christlichen Geschichtsdeutung aus neutestamentlicher Perspektive’ in Eddelbüttel, Antje and Schröter, Jens (eds.), Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit: Beiträge aus geschichtstheoretischer, philosophischer und theologischer Perspektive (Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, New York), 201–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeliger, Hans Reinhard. 1981. Kirchengeschichte, Geschichtstheologie, Geschichtswissenschaft: Analysen zur Wissenschaftstheorie und Theologie der katholischen Kirchengeschichtsschreibung (Patmos: Düsseldorf).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1969. ‘Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas’, History and Theory, 8: 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, Gabrielle M. 2007. ‘Revising the past/revisiting the present. How change happens in historiography’, History and Theory, Theme Issue: 1–19.Google Scholar
Spoerhase, Carlos. 2004. ‘Zwischen den Zeiten: Anachronismus und Präsentismus in der Methodologie der historischen Wissenschaften’, Jahrbuch für Geschichte der Literatur und der Wissenschaften/Yearbook for the History of Literature, Humanities, and Sciences, 8: 169240.Google Scholar
Spoerhase, Carlos. 2008. ‘Presentism and precursorship in intellectual history’, Culture, Theory and Critique, 49: 4972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreedharan, E. 2004. A Textbook of Historiography, 500 B.C. to A.D. 2000 (Orient Longman: New Delhi).Google Scholar
Straub, Jürgen. 2005. ‘Telling stories, making history: Toward a narrative psychology of the historical construction of meaning’ in Straub, Jürgen (ed.), Narration, Identity, and Historical Consciousness (Berghahn Books: New York, Oxford), 4498.Google Scholar
Strugatsky, Arkady and Boris, Arkady. 1977. Monday Begins on Saturday (DAW Books: New York).Google Scholar
Sturrock, John. 2003. Structuralism (Blackwell: Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Tiffany. 2000. The Classification of Visual Art: A Philosophical Myth and Its History (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Swiffen, Amy and Nichols, Joshua. 2013. The Ends of History: Questioning the Stakes of Historical Reason (Routledge: London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, Graham. 1983. Waterland (Picador in association with Heinemann: London).Google Scholar
Thrale, Hester Lynch. 1801. Retrospection; or a Review of the Most Striking and Important Events, Characters, Situations, and Their Consequences which the Last Eighteen Hundred Years Have Presented to the View of Mankind (J. Stockdale: London).Google Scholar
Trobisch, David. 1994. Paul’s Letter Collection: Tracing the Origins (Fortress Press: Minneapolis, MN).Google Scholar
Trobisch, David. 2000. The First Edition of the New Testament (Oxford University Press: Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turim, Maureen Cheryn. 1989. Flashbacks in Film: Memory & History (Routledge: New York).Google Scholar
Tynianov, Yuri. 1978. ‘Plot and story-line in the cinema’, Russian Poetics in Translation, 5: 20–1.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, Pol. 2016. ‘The enigma of the past: Ricoeur’s theory of narrative as a response to Heidegger’ in Vallée, Marc-Antoine and Davidson, Scott (eds.), Hermeneutics and Phenomenology in Paul Ricoeur. Between Text and Phenomenon (Springer: Cham, Switzerland), 123–39.Google Scholar
Vertov, Dziga and Michelson, Annette. 1984. Kino-Eye: The Writings of Dziga Vertov (Pluto: London).Google Scholar
Veyne, Paul. 1984. Writing History: Essay on Epistemology (Manchester University Press: Manchester).Google Scholar
Veyne, Paul. 1988. Die Originalität des Unbekannten für eine andere Geschichtsschreibung (Fischer-Taschenbuch-Verlag: Frankfurt am Main).Google Scholar
Veyne, Paul. 2010. When Our World Became Christian (Polity Press: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Vinzent, Jutta. 1997. Edlef Köppen – Schriftsteller zwischen den Fronten ein literaturhistorischer Beitrag zu Expressionismus, neuer Sachlichkeit und innerer Emigration; mit Edition, Werk- und Nachlaßverzeichnis (Iudicium: München).Google Scholar
Vinzent, Markus. 2006. Der Ursprung des Apostolikums im Urteil der kritischen Forschung (Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: Göttingen).Google Scholar
Vinzent, Markus. 2011. ‘Re-modernities: Or the volcanic landscapes of religion’, Journal of Beliefs & Values, 32: 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinzent, Markus. 2016a. ‘Embodied early and medieval Christianity: Challenging its “canonical” and “institutional” “origin”’, Religion in the Roman Empire, 2: 203–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinzent, Markus. 2016b. Tertullian’s Preface to Marcion’s Gospel (Peeters Publishers: Leuven).Google Scholar
Wallraff, Martin. 2015. Geschichte als Argument? Historiographie und Apologetik. Akten der Tagung der Patristischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft, Basel, 2. – 5.1.2013 (Peeters: Leuven).Google Scholar
Warnke, Georgia. 1987. Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition and Reason (Polity: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1968. ‘Die ‘Objektivität’ sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis’ in Weber, Max (ed.), Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, ed. Johannes Winckelmann (J.C.B. Mohr: Tübingen), 146214.Google Scholar
Werner, Michael and Zimmermann, Bénédicte. 2006. ‘Beyond comparison: Histoire croisée and the challenge of reflexivity’, History and Theory, 45: 3050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westra, Liuwe H. 2002. The Apostles’ Creed: Origin, History, and Some Early Commentaries (Brepols: Turnhout).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Benjamin L. 2011. ‘How to read a book: Irenaeus and the Pastoral Epistles reconsidered’, Vigiliae Christianae, 65: 125–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. Pearce. 1975. ‘Should philosophers be allowed to write history?’, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 26: 241–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Janet. 1981. The Social Production of Art (Macmillan: London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrall, Julian, Golani Solomon, Erez and Lieberman, Joshua. 2010. 21st century Tokyo: A Guide to Contemporary Architecture (Kodansha International: Tokyo).Google Scholar
Young, Frances M. 2006. ‘Prelude: Jesus Christ, foundation of Christianity’ in Young, Frances M. and Mitchell, Margarate M. (eds.), Origins to Constantine (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge), 134.Google Scholar
Zachhuber, Johannes. 2013. Theology as Science in Nineteenth-Century Germany: From F.C. Baur to Ernst Troeltsch (Oxford University Press: Oxford).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoeller, Guenter. 1988. ‘Habermas on modernity and postmodernism’, The Iowa Review, 18: 151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats