Bibliography

Abbott, J. (2005). Understanding and managing the unknown: The nature of uncertainty in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 24(3): 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamsky, D. (2019). Russian nuclear orthodoxy: Religion, politics, and strategy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Adamson, D. (1995). Blaise Pascal: Mathematician, physicist and thinker about God. Houndsworth: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler-Nissen, R. and Pouliot, V. (2014). Power in practice: Negotiating the international intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations 20(4): 889–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Afflerbach, H. and Strachan, H. (eds.) (2012). How fighting ends: A history of surrender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Airaksinen, T. (2011). Against all the odds: Machiavelli on fortune in politics. In Donskis, L. (ed.) Niccolò Machiavelli: History, power, and virtue. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar

Åkerstrøm Andersen, N. (2010). Luhmann as analytical strategist. In John, R., Henkel, A. and Rückert-John, J. (eds.) Die Methodologien des Systems. Wie kommt man zum Fall und wie dahinter? Berlin: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 97–117.Google Scholar

de Almeida Marques, J. O. (2005). The paths of providence: Voltaire and Rousseau on the Lisbon earthquake. Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência, Campinas, Série 3, 33–57.Google Scholar

Alkon, P. K. (2002). Science fiction before 1900: Imagination discovers technology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Althoff, G. (2000). Saxony and the Elbe Slavs in the Tenth Century. In Reuter, T. (ed.) C.900-c-1024. Vol III of the New Cambridge Medieval History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 267–292.Google Scholar

Andersson, J. (2018). The future of the world: Futurology, futurists, and the struggle for the post-Cold War imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angström, J. and Widen, J. (2015). Contemporary military theory: The dynamics of war. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ansell, C. and Boin, A. (2019). Taming deep uncertainty: The potential of pragmatist principles for understanding and improving strategic crisis management. Administration and Society, 51(7): 1079–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonenko, O. (1999). Russia, NATO and European security after Kosovo. Survival, 41(4): 124–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas (2002). On law, morality, and politics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Aradau, C. and Blanke, T. (2017). Politics of prediction: Security and the time/space of governmentality in the age of big data. European Journal of Social Theory 20(3): 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aradau, C. and Van Munster, R. (2007). Governing terrorism through risk: Taking precautions, (un) knowing the future. European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 89–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aradau, C. and Van Munster, R. (2008). Insuring terrorism, assuring subjects, ensuring normality: The politics of risk after 9/11. Alternatives 33(2): 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Araujo, A. C. (2006a). European public opinion and the Lisbon earthquake. European Review 14(3): 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Araújo, A. C. (2006b). The Lisbon earthquake of 1755: Public distress and political propaganda. E-journal of Portuguese History 4(1).Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1998 [1958]). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arendt, H. (2004). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar

De Armas, F. (2013). The Artful Gamblers: Wagering Danaë in Cervantes’ Don Quixote I.33–35’. In De Armas, F. A. and Barnard, M. E. (eds.) Objects of culture in the literature of imperial Spain. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 54–79.Google Scholar

Armitage, J. (1999). From modernism to hypermodernism and beyond: An interview with Paul Virilio. Theory, Culture & Society 16(5–6): 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Artyukh, M. A. (2020). Cultural and informational confrontation: History and modernity. Military Thought (Voennya Mysl) 29(2): 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augustine, S (2003 [1972]). The city of god. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. and Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science 211(4489): 1390–1396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Azzolini, M. (2013). The Duke and the stars: Astrology and politics in Renaissance Milan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Babich, B. E. (1994). Nietzsche’s philosophy of science: Reflecting science on the ground of art and life. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Baker, P. L. (1993). Chaos, order, and sociological theory. Sociological Inquiry 63(2): 123–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartly, A. R. (1991). Selling the true time: Nineteenth century timekeeping in America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Baudelaire, C. (2010 [1863]). The painter and modern life. In Baudelaire, C. (ed.) The painter and modern life. London: Penguin, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (1993). Modernity and ambivalence. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2000a). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2000b). Modernity and the holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2001). Wars of the globalization era. European Journal of Social Theory 4(1): 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid fear. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Baumlin, J. S. (2002). Ciceronian decorum and the temporalities of renaissance rhetoric. In Siporia, P. and Baumlin, J. S. (eds.) Rhetoric and Kairos: Essays in history, theory and praxis. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 138–164.Google Scholar

Baumlin, J. S. and Baumlin, T. F. (2002). Chronos, Kairos, Aion. Failures of Decorum, Right-Timing, and Revenge in Shakespeare’s Hamlet. In Siporia, P. and Baumlin, J. S. (eds.) Rhetoric and Kairos: Essays in history, theory and praxis. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 165–186.Google Scholar

BBC. (2021). ‘Ilyuziy net, o doverii rech’ne shla’. Putin i Bayden ob itogakh sboyey vstrechi b Zhenebe (‘There are no illusions, there was no talk of trust’. Putin and Biden on the results of their meeting in Geneva). BBC Russian 16 June 2021. www.bbc.com/russian/news-57485355 [Accessed on 2022-12-01].Google Scholar

Beck, U. (1987). The anthropological shock: Chernobyl and the contours of the risk society. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 32: 153–165.Google Scholar

Beck, U. (1992 [1986]). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Beck, U. (1994). The reinvention of politics. In Beck, U., Lash, S. and Giddens, A. (eds.) Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Oxford: Polity Press, pp. 1–55.Google Scholar

Beck, U. (2002). The terrorist threat. World risk society revisited. Theory, Culture and Society 19(4): 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, U. (2006). Cosmopolitan vision. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Beck, U. (2016). The metamorphosis of the world. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Beck, U., Lash, S. and Giddens, A. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Behringer, W. (1999).Climatic change and witch-hunting: The impact of the Little Ice Age on mentalities. Climatic Change 43(1): 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bejczy, I. (2008). Virtue ethics in the middle ages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Bell, C. M. (1997). Ritual: Perspectives and dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellamy, C. (2005). Absolute war: Soviet Russia in the Second World War: A modern history. London: Pan.Google Scholar

Bergström, I., Hedström, C. and Taylor, G. (1956). Dutch still-life painting in the seventeenth century. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Berman, M. (1988[1982]). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar

von Bernhardi, F. (1912). Deutschland und der nächste Krieg. Stuttgart: J. G. Cotta.Google Scholar

Bertelli, S. and Burr Litchfield, R. (2010). The King’s body: Sacred rituals of power in medieval and early modern Europe. Philadelphia: Penn State Press.Google Scholar

Besteman, C. (2017). Experimenting in Somalia: The new security empire. Anthropological Theory 17(3): 404–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betts, R. K. (1982). Surprise attack: Lessons for defense planning. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar

Betts, R. K. (2000). Is strategy an illusion? International Security 25(2): 5–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyerchen, A. (1992). Clausewitz, nonlinearity, and the unpredictability of war. International Security 17(3): 59–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biddle, S. D. (2004). Military power: Explaining victory and defeat in modern battle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, A. (2014). The myth of the Picaro: Continuity and transformation of the Picaresque Novel 1554–1954. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Boardman, M. E. (2005). Known unknowns: The illusion of terrorism insurance. Georgetown Law Journal 93(3): 783–844.Google Scholar

Bobbio, N. (1993). Thomas Hobbes and the natural law tradition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bobbitt, P. (1988). Democracy and deterrence: The history and future of nuclear strategy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bobbitt, P. (2002). The shield of Achilles: War, peace and the course of history. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Bobbitt, P. (2008). Terror and consent: The wars for the twenty-first century. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Book of Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments, and other Rites and Ceremonies of the Church, According to the Use of the Church of England: Together with the Psalter or Psalms of D., Pointed as they are to be sung or said in Churches. (1762 /1662/). London: J. Baskerville.Google Scholar

Booth, K. and Wheeler, N. J. (2008). The security dilemma: Fear, cooperation and trust in world politics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Bousquet, A. (2009). The scientific way of warfare: Order and chaos on the battlefields of modernity. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, R. (2011). Afgantsy: The Russians in Afghanistan, 1979–89. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Briggs, C. F. (2009). The body broken: Medieval Europe 1300–1520. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Brighton, H. and Gigerenzer, G.. (2012). Are rational actor models ‘rational’ outside small worlds. In Okasha, S. and Binmore, K. (eds.) Evolution and rationality: Decisions, co-operation, and strategic behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 84–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, C. (1995). Serpents in the sand: Essays on the nonlinear nature of politics and human destiny. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browne, C. (2017). Habermas and Giddens on Praxis and Modernity: A constructive comparison. Cambridge: Anthem Press.Google Scholar

Bucholz, A. (2001). Moltke and the German wars, 1864–1871. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, H. (2002 [1977]). The anarchical society: A study of order in world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Burckhardt, J. (1995). The civilization of the Renaissance in Italy. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar

Burke, P. (1986). Strengths and weaknesses of the history of mentalities. History of European Ideas 7(5): 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burke, P. (1992). History and social theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Buzan, B. and Albert, M. (2010). Differentiation: A sociological approach to international relations theory. European Journal of International Relations 16(3): 315–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buzan, B. and Lawson, G. (2015). The global transformation: History, modernity and the making of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrne, D. S. and Callaghan, G. (2013). Complexity theory and the social sciences: The state of the art. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, E. (2010). Enchanted Europe: Superstition, reason, and religion, 1250–1750. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camus, A. (1947). La peste. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Carr, G. (2003). Lion’s heads – Or just bricks and tiles? On satirical motifs and chance. In Rasche, H. and Schönfeld, C. (eds.) Denkbilder … Festschrift für Eoin Bourke. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann, pp. 179–190.Google Scholar

Caroll, S. (2005). Distribution of losses from large terrorist attacks under the terrorist risk insurance act. Santa Monica, CA: RAND corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cavallar, O. (1993). Francesco Guicciardini and the ‘Pisan Crisis’: Logic and discourses. The Journal of Modern History 65(2): 245–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cederman, L.-E. (2001). Back to Kant: Reinterpreting the democratic peace as a macrohistorical learning process. American Political Science Review 95(1): 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The climate of history: Four theses. Critical Inquiry 35(2): 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, D. (2006). Empire in denial: The politics of state-building. Pluto, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Charap, S., Treyger, E. and Geist, E. (2019). Understanding Russia’s intervention in Syria. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR3180.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheney, L. De Girolami. (2018). The symbolism of the skull in Vanitas: Homo Bulla Est. Cultural and Religious Studies 6(5): 267–284.Google Scholar

City Council of Siena. (2005). Ordinance May 1349 reprinted in Abert, J. The Black Death. The Great Mortality of 1348–1350. A Brief History with Documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 87–89.Google Scholar

Clark, C. M. (2007). Iron Kingdom. The Rise and Downfall of Prussia 1600–1947. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Clark, C. M. (2013). The sleepwalkers: How Europe went to war in 1914. London: PenguinGoogle Scholar

Clark, I. (1989). The hierarchy of states: Reform and resistance in the international order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, S. (2002). Witchcraft and magic in early modern culture. In Ankarloo, B., Clark, S., and Monter, W. (eds.) Witchcraft and magic in Europe. Vol. 4, The period of the witch trials. London: Athlone, pp. 97–170.Google Scholar

Clarke, I. F. (ed.) (1995). The tale of the next great war, 1871–1914: Fictions of future warfare and of battles-still-to-come. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

von Clausewitz, C. (1976). On war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Clausewitz, C. (1982). On war. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Cochran, M. (2012). Pragmatism and international relations. A story of closure and opening. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 4.IV-1.Google Scholar

Cohn, S. K. (2002). The Black Death: End of a paradigm. American Historical Review 107(3): 703–738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coker, C. (2004). The future of war: The re-enchantment of war in the twenty-first century. Oxford: Blackwell Manifestos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coker, C. (2009). War in an age of risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Collier, R. B. and Collier, D. (2002). Shaping the political arena. Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe. Final Act. Helsinki 1975 www.osce.org/helsinki-final-act?download=true [Accessed 2020-02-03].Google Scholar

Connelly, M. et al. (2012). ‘General, I Have Fought Just as Many Nuclear Wars as You Have’: Forecasts, future scenarios, and the politics of Armageddon. The American Historical Review 117(5): 1431–1460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Contamine, P. (1984). War in the middle ages. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Colby, E. (1927). How to fight savage tribes. American Journal of International Law 21(2): 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conway, D. W. (1997). Nietzsche and the political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium 10(2): 126–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cudworth, E. and Hobden, S. (2015). Complexifying international relations for a posthumanist world. In Kavalski, E. (ed.) World politics and the edge of chaos: Reflections of complexity and global life. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 169–188.Google Scholar

Danilovic, V. (2001). The sources of threat credibility in extended deterrence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45(3), 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dannreuther, R. (2015). Russia and the Arab Spring: Supporting the counter-revolution. Journal of European Integration 37(1): 77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daston, L. (1988). Classical probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, W. (2019). Nervous states: How feeling took over the world. London: Vintage.Google Scholar

Defoe, D. (2005a [1704a]). The storm. In Defoe, D. (ed.) The Storm. London: Penguin Books, pp. 1–180.Google Scholar

Defoe, D. (2005b [1704b]). The lay-man’s sermon upon the late storm. In Defoe, D. (ed.) The storm. London: Penguin Books, pp. 181–200.Google Scholar

Defoe, D. (2018 [1697]). Of wagering. In Defoe, D. (ed.) The complete works of Daniel Defoe. Wroclaw: E-artnow. Amazon fulfilment, pp. 107–108.Google Scholar

De Mesquita, B. B. et al. (2004). Testing novel implications from the selectorate theory of war. World Politics 56(3): 363–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Mesquita, B. B. et al. (2005). The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Descamps, É. (1902). La neutralité de la Belgique au point de vue historique, diplomatique, juridique et politique: Étude sur la constitution des états pacifiques à litre permanent. Bruxelles: Veuve F. Larcier.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. (2003). Discourse on method and related writings. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Deudney, D. H. (1995). The Philadelphian system: Sovereignty, arms control, and balance of power in the American states-union, circa 1787–1861. International Organization 49(2): 191–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deudney, D. H. (2004). Publius before Kant: Federal–republican security and democratic peace. European Journal of International Relations 10(3): 315–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, J. (1930). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Dilthey, W. (1911). Die Typen der Weltanschauung und ihre Ausbildung in den Metaphysischen Systemen. Berlin: Reichl.Google Scholar

DiTommaso, L. (2021). The Four Kingdoms of Daniel in the Early Medieval Apocalyptic Tradition. In Perrin, A. B. and Stuckenbruck, L. T. (eds.) Four Kingdom Motifs before and beyond the Book of Daniel. Leiden: Brill, pp. 205–250.Google Scholar

Dixon, P. (2009). ‘Hearts and minds’? British counter-insurgency from Malaya to Iraq. Journal of Strategic Studies 32(3): 353–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dodge, T. (2013). State and society in Iraq ten years after regime change: the rise of a new authoritarianism. International Affairs 89(2): 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Douglas, M.(1994). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Doyle, M. (1983). Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs. Philosophy and Public Affairs 12(3): 205–235.Google Scholar

Duyvesteyn, I. (2004). How new is the new terrorism? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27(5): 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenstadt, S. N. (2001). The civilizational dimension of modernity: Modernity as a distinct civilization. International Sociology 16(3): 320–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenstadt, S. N. (ed.) (2002). Multiple modernities. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, S. N. (2003). Comparative civilizations and multiple modernities: A collection of essays. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology? London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, A. (2015). Empire of chance: The Napoleonic Wars and the disorder of things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engerman, D. C. and Unger, C. R. (2009). Introduction: Towards a global history of modernization. Diplomatic History 33(3): 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Englund, P. (1994). Ofredsår: om den svenska stormaktstiden och en man i dess mitt. Stockholm: Atlantis.Google Scholar

Englund, P. (2000). Den Oövervinnerlige. Om den svenska stormaktstiden och en man i dess mitt. Stockholm: Atlantis.Google Scholar

Englund, S. (2010). Napoleon: A political life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Engström, M. (2014). Contemporary Russian messianism and new Russian foreign policy. Contemporary Security Policy 35(3): 356–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engström, M. (2022). För Putin har kriget bibliska proportioner. Svenska Dagbladet, Monday 21 March, p. 20.Google Scholar

Erickson, P. et al. (2013). How reason almost lost its mind: The strange career of Cold War rationality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esposito, E. (2011). The future of futures: The time of money in financing and society. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esposito, E. (2012). Kontingenzerfahrung und Kontingenzbewusstsein in systemteoretischer Perspektive. In Toens, K. and Willems, U. (eds.) Politik und Kontingenz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 38–48.Google Scholar

Esposito, E. (2013). The structures of uncertainty: Performativity and unpredictability in economic operations. Economy and Society 42(1): 102–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esposito, E. (2014). Algorithmische Kontingenz. Der Umgang mit Unsicherheit im Web. In Cevolini, A. (ed.) Die Ordnung des Kontingenten. Beiträge zur zahlenmäßigen Selbstbeschreibung der modernen Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esposito, E. (2017). Critique without crisis: Systems theory as a critical sociology. Thesis Eleven 143(1): 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ewald, F. (1986). L’Etat providence. Paris: B. Grasset.Google Scholar

Fagan, B. M. (2000). The Little Ice Age: How climate made history, 1300–1850. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fasolt, C. (2004). The limits of history. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Fearon, J. D. (1994). Signaling versus the balance of power and interests: An empirical test of a crisis bargaining model. Journal of Conflict Resolution 38(2), 236–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Festenstein, M. (2001). Inquiry as critique: On the legacy of Deweyan pragmatism for political theory. Political Studies 49(4): 730–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkel, M. (2011). On flexibility: Recovery from technological and doctrinal surprise on the battlefield. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finkel, M. (2020a). AI singularity and the growing risk of surprise. PRISM 8(4): 30–39.Google Scholar

Finkel, M. (2020b). Military agility: Ensuring rapid and effective transition from peace to war. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar

Finnemore, M. (2003). The purpose of intervention changing beliefs about the use of force. Ithaca: Cornell.Google Scholar

Fitzsimmons, M. (2006). The problem of uncertainty in strategic planning. Survival 48(4): 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleming, J. R. (2010). Fixing the sky: The checkered history of weather and climate control. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Flex, W. (2014). Der Wanderer zwischen beiden Welten: ein Kriegserlebnis. München: Bge-verlag.Google Scholar

Ford, M. (2022). The smartphone as weapon part 2: The targeting cycle in Ukraine. Published on Academia.edu on 29 April 2022.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

France. (2017). Revue Stratégique de Défense et de Sécurité Nationale, pp. 5–6. Downloaded from www.defense.gouv.fr/dgris/presentation/evenements-archives/revue-strategique-de-defense-et-de-securite-nationale-2017 [Accessed 2020-10-12].Google Scholar

Freedman, L. (1996). Vietnam and the disillusioned strategist. International Affairs 72(1): 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, L. (2004). Deterrence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy: A history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Freedman, L. (2018). The future of war: A history. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Freedman, L. (2019). Ukraine and the art of strategy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Freedman, L. and Karsh, E. (1991). How Kuwait was won: Strategy in the Gulf War. International Security 16(2): 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frederick II, King of Prussia. (2016). Military Instructions from the Late King of Prussia to His Generals. In Frederick the Great on warfare. Oakpast Press, pp. 11–95.Google Scholar

French, S. A. et al. (1997). Pricing strategy to promote fruit and vegetable purchase in high school cafeterias. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 97(9): 1008–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Friedrichs, J. and Kratochwil, F. (2009). On acting and knowing: How pragmatism can advance international relations research and methodology. International Organization 63(4): 701–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frühling, S. (2006). Uncertainty, forecasting and the difficulty of strategy. Comparative Strategy 25(1): 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The National Interest (16): 3–18.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (2004). The imperative of state-building. Journal of Democracy 15(2): 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (2005). State-building: Governance and world order in the twenty-first century. London: Profile.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, F. (2007). Blindside: How to anticipate forcing events and wild cards in global politics. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar

Gabriel, L.-M. (2017). Zukunfspessimismus in der Frühen Neuzeit? Zu frühneuzeitlichen Zukunfsvorstellungen am Beispiel des Vanitas-Motives zur Zeit der Barock. BA Thesis, University of Innsbruck Historia Scribere 09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galeotti, M. (2018). I am sorry for creating the Gerasimov doctrine. Foreign Policy 5 March. https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/03/05/im-sorry-for-creating-the-gerasimov-doctrine/ [Accessed 2019-11-01].Google Scholar

Galula, D. (2006[1964]). Counterinsurgency warfare: Theory and practice. Praeger Security Westport, CT: International.Google Scholar

Garrard, G. (2006). Counter-Enlightenments: From the eighteenth century to the present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gat, A. (2001). A history of military thought: From the enlightenment to the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Gay, W. O. ‘Sherlock Holmes and the railways’ published online by the British Transport Police History Group. www.btphg.org.uk/?page_id=4808 [Accessed 2021-04-27].Google Scholar

Gensini, G. F., Yacoub, M. H. and Conti, A. A. (2004). The concept of quarantine in history: From plague to SARS. Journal of Infection 49(4): 257–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gentile, G. P. (2009). A strategy of tactics: Population-centric COIN and the Army. Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gentry, F. G. (1975). Triuwe and Vriunt in the Nibelungenlied. Amsterdam: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gertsman, E. (2010). The dance of death in the Middle Ages: Image, text, performance. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Ghamari-Tabrizi, S. (2005). The worlds of Herman Kahn: The intuitive science of thermonuclear war. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, M. (2006). Dracula and the eastern question: British and French vampire narratives of the nineteenth-century Near East. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giddens, A. (1985). A contemporary critique of historical materialism Vol. 2 The nation-state and violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (2000a). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (2000b). The third way and its critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. and Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 62: 451–482.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilman, N. (2003). Mandarins of the future: Modernization theory in Cold War America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Goerlitz, W. (1995). History of the German General Staff, 1657–1945. London: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Le Goff, J. (1984). The birth of purgatory. London: Scolar.Google Scholar

Goldfarb, A. and Lindsay, J. R. (2021). Prediction and judgment: Why artificial intelligence increases the importance of humans in war. International Security 46(3): 7–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence 1(1): 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstone, J. A. et al. (2010). A global model for forecasting political instability. American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 190–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodhart, D. (2017). The Road to somewhere: The populist revolt and the future of politics. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar

Gorbunova, Y. (2021). Russia’s deadly negligence of domestic violence. Moscow Times, 8 March. www.hrw.org/news/2021/03/08/russias-deadly-negligence-domestic-violence [Accessed 2022-03-18].Google Scholar

Gorski, P. S. (2003). The Disciplinary revolution: Calvinism and the rise of the state in early modern Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Graaf, B. (2020). Fighting terror after Napoleon: How Europe became secure after 1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graeber, D. and Sahlins, M. (2017). On kings. Chicago, IL: Hau Books.Google Scholar

Graham, G. (2005). Counter-Enlightenments: From the eighteenth century to the present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gray, C. S. (2014). Strategy and defence planning: Meeting the challenge of uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grewe, W. G. (2000). The Epochs of international law. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimm, D. (1990). Verfassung (II.) Konstitution, Grundgesetze. In Koselleck, R., Brunner, O. and Conze, W. (eds.) Band 6 St-Vert, Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 863–899.Google Scholar

Gross, G. P. (2008). There was a Schlieffen plan: New sources on the history of German military planning. War in History 15(4): 389–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gross, G. P. (2016). The myth and reality of German warfare: Operational thinking from Moltke the Elder to Heusinger. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar

Grotius, H. (2013). On the law of war and peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Guicciardini, F. (1984 [1969]). The history of Italy. Translated, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gustav II Adolf (1861a). Krigsfolks-ordning. In Styffe, C. G. (ed.) Konung Gustaf II Adolfs Skrifter. Stockholm: P.A. Norstedt & Söner, pp. 1–68.Google Scholar

Gustav II Adolf (1861b). K. Gustaf Adolfs egen historia. In Styffe, C. G. (ed.) Konung Gustaf II Adolfs Skrifter. Stockholm: P.A. Norstedt & Söner, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity. Twelve lectures. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1975). The emergence of probability: A philosophical study of early ideas about probability, induction and statistical inference. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, I. (2006). The emergence of probability: A philosophical study of early ideas about probability, induction and statistical inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldén, P. (2012). A call for hermeneutical perspectives on climate change and conflict: The case of Ethiopia and Eritrea. Journal of International Relations and Development 15(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldén, P. (2013a). Republican continuities in the Vienna Order and the German Confederation (1815–66). European Journal of International Relations 19(2): 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldén, P. (2013b). A non-sovereign modernity: Attempts to engineer stability in the Balkans 1820–90. Review of International Studies 39(2): 337–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldén, P. (2014). Reconceptualizing state formation as collective power: Representation in electoral monarchies. Journal of Political Power, 7(1): 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldén, P. (2016). From total to minimal transformation: German Oaths of Loyalty 1871–2014. In Haldén, P. and Jackson, P. (eds.) Transforming warriors: The ritual organization of military force. London: Routledge, pp. 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldén, P. (2018). Organized armed groups as ruling organizations. Armed Forces & Society 44(4): 606–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldén, P. (2020). Family power: Kinship, war and political orders in Eurasia, 500–2018. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haldén, P. and Tjällén, B. (2017). Inledning. In Haldén, P. and Tjällén, B. (eds.) Mod i strid och filosofi. Dygdetiska perspektiv från Aristoteles till drönarkriget. Lund: Nordic Academic Press, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar

Hall, J. A. (1986). Powers and liberties: The causes and consequences of the rise of the West. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Hamblyn, R. (2005 [1704]). Introduction. In Defoe, D. (ed.) The Storm. London: Penguin Books, pp. x–xl.Google Scholar

Hamilton, C., Bonneuil, C. and Gemenne, F. (2015). Thinking the Anthropocene. In Hamilton, C., Bonneuil, C. and Gemenne, F. (eds.) The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hampson, N. (1999). The Enlightenment. In Cameron, E. (ed.) Early modern Europe: An Oxford history. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 265–297.Google Scholar

Harrison, N. E. (ed.) (2006). Complexity in world politics: Concepts and methods of a new paradigm. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haushofer, K.(1934). Weltpolitik von heute. Berlin.Google Scholar

Haushofer, K. (1936). Geopolitische Grundlagen. Berlin.Google Scholar

Hedström, P. and Wittrock, B. (2009). Introduction: Frontiers of sociology. In Hedström, P. and Wittrock, B. (eds.) Frontiers of sociology. Leiden: Brill, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heezen-Stoll, B. A. (1979). A vanitas still life of 1621 by Jacques de Gheyn II: A reflection of neo-stoic ideas. Oud Holland – Journal for the Art of the Low Countries 93(4): 246–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hefernan, M. (2000). Fin de siècle, fin du monde? On the origins of European geopolitics, 1890–1920. In Dodds, K. and Atkinson, D. (eds.) Geopolitical traditions: A century of geopolitical thought. London: Routledge, pp. 27–52.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1956 [1837]). The philosophy of history. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Hegre, H., Oneal, J. R. and Russett, B. (2010). Trade does promote peace: New simultaneous estimates of the reciprocal effects of trade and conflict. Journal of Peace Research 47(6): 763–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hegre, H., et al. (2013). Predicting armed conflict, 2010–2050. International Studies Quarterly 57(2): 250–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, M. (2006). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer, M.Google Scholar

Hellerstedt, A. (2009). Ödets teater. Ödesföreställning i Sverige vid 1700-talets början. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.Google Scholar

Heng, Y-K. (2006). The ‘transformation of war’ debate: Through the looking glass of Ulrich Beck’s world risk society. International Relations 20(1): 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hengstmengel, J. (2019). Divine providence in early modern economic thought. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henriksen, D. (2008). Inflexible response: Diplomacy, airpower and the Kosovo Crisis, 1998–1999. Journal of Strategic Studies 31(6): 825–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herz, J. H. (1950). Idealist internationalism and the security dilemma. World Politics, 2(2): 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Hilgers, P. (2000). Eine Anleitung zur Anleitung. Das taktische Kriegsspeil 1812–1824. Board Game Studies 3: 59–77.Google Scholar

Hill, L. (2001). The hidden theology of Adam Smith. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 8(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hitler, A. (1939). Mein Kampf. London: Houghton-Mifflin Company.Google Scholar

Hobden, S. and Hobson, J. M. (eds.) (2002). Historical sociology of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. J. (2000). The age of empire: 1875–1914. London: Phoenix, London.Google Scholar

Hobson, C. (2011). Towards a critical theory of democratic peace. Review of International Studies 37(4): 1903–1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hobson, J. A. (2020 [1905]). Imperialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st century: The rise of hybrid wars. Arlington, VA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, www.potomacinstitute.org/images/stories/publications/potomac_hybridwar_0108.pdf [Accessed 2019-11-06].Google Scholar

Hogle, J. E. (2002). The Cambridge companion to gothic fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holborg, H. (1986). The Prusso-German School: Moltke and the rise of the General Staff. In Paret, P., Craig, G. A. and Gilbert, F. (eds.) Makers of modern strategy: From Machiavelli to the nuclear age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1991). Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Holm, I. W. (2012). Earthquake in Haiti: Kleist and the birth of modern disaster discourse. New German Critique 39(1): 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, T. M. (2003). Asking Schlieffen: A Further Reply to Terence Zuber. War in History 10(4): 464–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, T. M. (2007). Planning versus Chaos in Clausewitz’s on war. Journal of Strategic Studies 30(1): 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hölscher, L. (1999). Die Entdeckung der Zukunft. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Vlg.Google Scholar

Honig, J. W. (2012). Reappraising late medieval strategy: The example of the 1415 Agincourt Campaign. War in History 19(2): 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honig, O. (2008). Surprise attacks – Are they inevitable? Moving beyond the orthodox–revisionist dichotomy. Security Studies 17(1): 72–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hont, I. (1994). The permanent crisis of a divided mankind: ‘Contemporary crisis of the nation state’ in historical perspective. Political Studies 42(1): 166–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horkheimer, M. and Adorno, T. W. (2002 [1944]). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hörnqvist, M. (2004). Machiavelli and empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, J. (2013). Russia and the secession of Kosovo: Power, norms and the failure of multilateralism. Europe-Asia Studies 65(5): 992–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huizinga, J. H. (1990 [1919]). The waning of the Middle Ages. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Huizinga, J. H. (2016 [1938]). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Kettering, OH: Angelico Press.Google Scholar

Hull, I. V. (2005). Absolute destruction: Military culture and the practices of war in Imperial Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Huntington, S. P. (1967). The bases of accommodation. Foreign Affairs 46(4): 642–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iggers, G. G. (1995). Historicism: The history and meaning of the term. Journal of the History of Ideas 56(1): 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International Committee of the Red Cross. (1949). Convention (III) relative to the treatment of prisoners of war. Geneva 12 August 1949. https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/INTRO/375 [Accessed 2020-09-15].Google Scholar

IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (eds.)]. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 151 pp.Google Scholar

Jackson, R., Sørensen, G. and Møller, J. (2019). Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Z. J. (2016). On the ‘arcane science of Kremlinology’ or the case of the vanishing birthdays. Cold War History 16(2):141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jalava, J. (2003). From norms to trust: The Luhmannian connections between trust and system. European Journal of Social Theory 6(2): 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, I. (2007). Paul Virilio. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, W. (2003 [1907]). Pragmatism, a new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar

Japan, (1949 [1937]). Kokutai no hongi: Cardinal principles of the national entity of Japan. Translated by John Owen Gauntlett. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Japp, K. P. and Kusche, I. (2008). Systems theory and risk. In Zinn, J. (ed.) Social theories of risk and uncertainty: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 76–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jay, J., Madison, J. and Hamilton, A. (1987[1788]). The federalist papers. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Jefferson, A. (2015). Genius in France: An idea and its uses. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, T. (1999). Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, R. (2000). Disenchantment, enchantment and re-enchantment: Max Weber at the millennium. Max Weber Studies 1(1): 11–32.Google Scholar

Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Joas, H. (2010). The contingency of secularization: Reflections on the problem of secularization in the work of Reinhardt Koselleck. In Joas, H. and Klein, B. (eds.) The benefit of broad horizons. intellectual and institutional preconditions for a global social science. Festschrift for Bjorn Wittrock on the occassion of his 65th birthday. Leiden, Boston: Brill, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar

Joas, H. (2012). Das Zeitalter der Kontingenz. In Toens, K. and Willems, U. (eds.) Politik und Kontingenz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joas, H. and Knöbl, W. (2013). War in social thought: Hobbes to the present. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence in nuclear warfare: a perfect storm of instability? The Washington Quarterly 43(2): 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jonsson, O. (2019). The Russian understanding of war: Blurring the lines between war and peace. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jünger, E. (1922). Der Kampf als inneres Erlebnis. Berlin: E.S. Mittler & Sohn.Google Scholar

Jünger, E. (2003[1920]). In Stahlgewittern. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1784). Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung. Berlinische Monatsschrift 4: 481–494.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1991a [1797]). The metaphysics of morals. In Kant, I. and Reiss, H. S. (eds.) Kant: Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. (1991b [1795]). Perpetual peace – A philosophical sketch. In Kant, I. and Reiss, H. S. (eds.) Kant: Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kadlec, A. (2006). Reconstructing Dewey: The philosophy of critical pragmatism. Polity 38(4): 519–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kagan, F. W. (2006). Russian war planning, 1815–56. In Imlay, T. C and Toft, M. D. (eds.) The fog of peace and war planning: Military and strategic planning under uncertainty. London: Routledge, pp. 26–50.Google Scholar

Kahn, H. (1965). On escalation: Metaphors and scenarios. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Kahn, H. (2007 [1960]). On thermonuclear war. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Kam, E. (1988). Surprise attack: The victim’s perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kantorowicz, E. H. (1997[1957]). The King’s two bodies: A study in mediaeval political theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kåre, J. M. and Tuorma, S.. (2020). Afterword: Back to the future, forward to the past? Explorations in Russian science fiction and fantasy. In Suslov, M. and Bodin, P-A. (eds.) The post-Soviet politics of Utopia: Language, fiction and fantasy in modern Russia. London: I.B. Tauris, pp. 315–329.Google Scholar

Kaspersen, L. B. (2002). The ‘warfare-paradigm’ in historical sociology: Warfare as a driving historical force. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 3(2): 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaspersen, L. B. (2021). War, survival units and citizenship. A Neo-Elisian processual-relational perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kavalski, E. (2015a). Introduction. Inside/outside and around. Observing the Complexity of global life. In Kavalski, E. (ed.) World politics at the edge of chaos: Reflections on complexity and global life. Albany, NY: Suny Press, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Kavalski, E. (2015b). Conclusion: Complexifying IR. Disturbing the ‘deep Newtonian slumber’ of the mainstream. In Kavalski, E. (ed.) World politics at the edge of chaos: Reflections on complexity and global life. Albany, NY: Suny Press, pp. 253–272.Google Scholar

Kessler, O. and Daase, C. (2008). From insecurity to uncertainty: Risk and the paradox of security politics. Alternatives 33(2): 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keen, M. (2005[1984]). Chivalry. New Haven, CT: Yale Nota Bene.Google Scholar

Keen, M. (2015). The laws of war in the late middle ages. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keene, E. (2005). International political thought: A historical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Kennan, G. (1947). The sources of Soviet conduct. Foreign Affairs 25(4): 566–582.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. (1996). International Law and the nineteenth century: History of an illusion. Nordic Journal of International Law 65:385–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, P. M. (1987). The rise and fall of the great powers: Economic change and military conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on probability. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Killcullen, D. (2009). The accidental guerilla. Fighting small wars in the midst of a big one. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar

King, A. (2017). ‘Then a great misfortune befell them’: The laws of war on surrender and the killing of prisoners on the battlefield in the Hundred Years War. Journal of Medieval History 43(1), 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kinnvall, C., and Mitzen, J. (2020). Anxiety, fear, and ontological security in world politics: Thinking with and beyond Giddens. International Theory, 12(2): 240–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirchner, G. (1969). Fortuna in Dichtung und Emblematik des Barock. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kissinger, H. (2000 [1957]). A world restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the problems of peace 1812–1822. London, Phoenix.Google Scholar

Kjellén, R. (1905). Stormakterna: konturer kring samtidens storpolitik. D. 1, Rent europeiska stormakter. Stockholm: Geber.Google Scholar

Kjellén, R. (1916). Politiska handböcker 3 Staten som lifsform. Stockholm: Hugo Geber.Google Scholar

Kleer, R. A. (2017). Money, politics and power: Banking and public finance in wartime England, 1694–96. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, F. H. (1964[1921]). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: A.M. Kelley.Google Scholar

Knöbl, W. (2012). Kontingenzen und methodologische Konsequenzen – Vom schwierigen Umgang mit einem sperrigen Thema. In Toens, K. and Willems, U. (eds.) Politik und Kontingenz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knox, G. (2000). Common destiny, dictatorship, foreign policy and war in fascist Italy and Nazi-Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korman, S. (1996). The right of conquest. The acquisition of territory by force in International Law and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. (1988). Critique and crisis: Enlightenment and the pathogenesis of modern society. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. (1989). Erfahrungsraum und Erwartungshorizont – zwei historische Kategorien. In Koselleck, R. (ed.) Vergangene Zukunft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 349–375.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. (1992a). Geschichtliche Prognose in Lorenz v. Steins Schrift zur preußischen Verfassung. In Koselleck, R. (ed.) Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. (1992b). Historische Kriterien des neuzeitlichen Revolutionsbegriff. In Koselleck, R. (ed.) Vergangene Zukunft: zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 67–86.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. (2004). Historia Magistra Vitae. The dissolution of the Topos into the perspective of a modernized historical process. In Futures past. On the semantics of historical time. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 26–43.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. (2004 [1975]). Fortschritt. In Brunner, O., Conze, W. and Koselleck, R. (eds.) Band 2 E-G. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexicon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 351–423.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. (2018a). Sediments of time. In Koselleck, R. (ed.) Sediments of time. On possible histories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. (2018b). Does history accelerate? In Koselleck, R. (ed.) Sediments of time. On possible histories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 79–99.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M. (2009). Miserable comforters: International relations as new natural law. European Journal of International Relations, 15(3): 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kragh, M. and Åsberg, S. (2017). Russia’s strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures: The Swedish case. Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(6): 773–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kragh, M., Andermo, E. and Makashova, L. (2020). Conspiracy theories in Russian security thinking. Journal of Strategic Studies, 45(3): 1–35, 334–368.Google Scholar

Krause, K. and Williams, M. C. (eds.) (1997). Critical security studies: Concepts and cases. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar

Kreps, S. E. (2011). Coalitions of convenience: United States interventions after the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kroenig, M. (2018). The logic of American nuclear strategy: Why strategic superiority matters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krüger, L., Gigerenzer, G. and Morgan, M. S. (eds.) (1987). The probabilistic revolution Vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kunish, J. (2004). Friedrich der Grosse. Der König und seine Zeit. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar

Kunreuther, H., Erwann, M-K. and Porter, B. (2003). Assessing, managing, and financing extreme events: Dealing with terrorism. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kunzle, D. (2002). From criminal to courtier. The soldier in Netherlandish Art 1550–1672. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurki, M. (2008). Causation in international relations: Reclaiming causal analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurtulus, E. N. (2011). The ‘new terrorism’ and its critics. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 34(6): 476–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kushnir, O. (2019). Messianic narrations in contemporary Russian statecraft and foreign policy. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies 13(1):37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kustermans, J. and Ringmar, E. (2011). Modernity, boredom, and war: A suggestive essay. Review of International Studies 37(4): 1775–1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lacy, Mark (2014). Security, technology and global politics, thinking with Virilio. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lawrence, F. (2018). The future of war: A history. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Lawrence, P. K. (1997). Modernity and war: The creed of absolute violence. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lawson, G. (2019). Anatomies of revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Layne, C. (1994). Kant or Cant: The myth of the democratic peace. International Security 19 (2):5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lebow, R. N. (2001). Deterrence and reassurance: Lessons from the Cold War. Global Dialogue 3(4): 119–132.Google Scholar

Lebow, R. N. (2006). Reason divorced from reality: Thomas Schelling and strategic bargaining. International Politics 43(4):429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lebow, R. N. (2010). Forbidden fruit: Counterfactuals and international relations. Princeton, PA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lebow, R. N. (2017). Weber’s search for knowledge. In Lebow, R. N. (ed.) Max Weber and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 40–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leeson, P. T. (2011). Trial by battle. Journal of Legal Analysis 3(1): 341–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Leeuwen, M. H. D. (2016). Mutual insurance 1550–2015. From Guild Welfare and Friendly Societies to contemporary micro-insurers. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Leonard, A. (ed.) (2015). Marine insurance: Origins and institutions, 1300–1850. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lexer, M. (1878). Veige. In Lexer, M. (ed.). VF-Z volume 3 of Mittelhochdeutsches Handwörterbuch. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.Google Scholar

Linglebach, W. E. (1933). Belgian neutrality: Its origin and interpretation. The American Historical Review 39(1):48–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Littell, C. F. (1920). The neutralization of states: A study in diplomatic history and international law. Dissertation. New York, NY: Colombia University.Google Scholar

Livingston, J. (2003). War and the intellectuals: Bourne, Dewey, and the fate of pragmatism. Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 2(4): 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Löwith, K. (1949). Meaning in history: The theological implications of the philosophy of history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Luban, D. (2020). What is spontaneous order? American Political Science Review 114(1): 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1968). Vertrauen: ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale systeme: grundriss einer allgemeinen theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (2000). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations 6(1): 94–107.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (2008). Risk. A sociological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (2017). Trust and power. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lynn, J. A. (2003). Battle: A history of combat and culture. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar

Macamo, E. S. (2017). The taming of fate. Approaching risk from a social action perspective. Case studies from Southern Mozambique. Codesria, Senegal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, M. (2014). Overreach: Delusions of regime change in Iraq. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, N. (1998 [1531]). The discourses. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, N. (2013a [1531]). The prince. Cumberland House: Wordsworth editions.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, N. (2013b [1532]). Il Principe. Testo e Saggi. Instituto della Enciclopedia Italiana. Roma: Fondata da Giovanni Treccani.Google Scholar

Mack, A. (1975). Why big nations lose small wars: The politics of asymmetric conflict. World Politics 27(2): 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madison, J. (1987[1788]). The federalist papers. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society 29(4): 507–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maine, H. S. (2012 [1861]). Ancient law: Its connection with the early history of society, and its relation to modern ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malashenko, A. V. (2013). Russia and the Arab Spring. Moscow: Carnegie Moscow Center.Google Scholar

Maleševic´, S. (2010). The sociology of war and violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maleševic´, S. (2017). The rise of organised brutality: A historical sociology of violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mälksoo, M. (2020). Countering hybrid warfare as ontological security management: The emerging practices of the EU and NATO. In Kinnvall, C., Manners, I. and Mitzen, J. (eds.) Ontological insecurity in the European Union. London: Routledge, pp. 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mamdani, M. (2012). Define and rule: Native as political identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, M. (1993). Sources of social power. Volume II of The rise of classes and nation-states, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Manning, R. (2006). An apprenticeship in arms: The origins of the British Army 1585–1702. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcus, Aurelius. (2006). Meditations. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Margolis, J. (2018). Reinventing pragmatism: American philosophy at the end of the twentieth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, J. (2007). Medieval Russia 980–1584. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, W. (2006). Bubbles and skulls: The phenomenology of self‐consciousness in Dutch still‐life painting. In Wrathal, M. and Dreyfus, H. L. (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Phenomenology and Existentialism. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 559–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marx, K. and Engels, F. (2008 [1848]). The Communist Manifesto. Rockville, MD: The Wildside Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mallet, M. (1995). Italy (a) The Northern Italian States’ c. 1415–c. 1500. In Allmand, C. (ed.) Volume 7 of The New Cambridge Medieval History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maul, S. (1999). Der assyrische König-Hüter der Weltordnung. In Watanabe, K. (ed.) Priest and Officials in the Ancient Near East. Papers at the Second Colloquium on the Ancient Near East –The City and its Life, held at the Middle Eastern Cultural Center in Japan, March 22–24, 1996, pp. 201–214.Google Scholar

Mayall, J. (1990). Nationalism and International Society. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, A. J. (2010). The persistence of the old regime: Europe to the Great War. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Mazower, M. (2000). Dark continent: Europe’s twentieth century. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

McCarthy, T. (1990 [1987]). Introduction. In Habermas, J. (ed.) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Twelve Lectures. Cambridge: Blackwell Press, pp. vii–xx.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2014). Why the Ukraine crisis is the West’s fault: The liberal delusions that provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs 93(5):77–89.Google Scholar

Meinander, H. (2012). Republiken Finland i går och i dag: Finlands historia från inbördeskriget till 2012. Helsingfors: Schildts & Söderströms.Google Scholar

Merridee, L. B. and Barclay, K. (eds.) Emotion, ritual and power in Europe, 1200–1920: Family, state and church. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review 1(6): 894–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. The Antioch Review 8(2): 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mica, A. (2018). Sociology as analysis of the unintended: From the problem of ignorance to the discovery of the possible. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michelsen, N. and de Orellana, P. (2020). Pessimism and the Alt-Right: Knowledge, power, race and time. In Stevens, T. and Michelsen, N. (eds.) Pessimism in International relations. Provocations, possibilities, politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milbank, A. (1992). Daughters of the house: Modes of the Gothic in Victorian fiction. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milne, D. (2007). ‘Our equivalent of guerrilla warfare’: Walt Rostow and the Bombing of North Vietnam, 1961–1968. The Journal of Military History 71(1): 169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milovanowitch, M. (1888). Les traités de garantie au 19e siècle. Paris: Librarie nouvelle de droit et de jurisprudence.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (2003[1859]). On liberty. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Mintzberg, H. (2000). The rise and fall of strategic planning. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Miscamble, W. D. (2011). The most controversial decision: Truman, the atomic bombs, and the defeat of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

von Moltke, H. (1993). The nature of war. In Hughes, D. (ed.) Moltke on the art of war. New York: Ballantine Books, pp. 21–74.Google Scholar

Monter, E. W. (1984). Ritual, myth and magic in early modern Europe. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, D. and Wilkinson, I. (2001). The problem of suffering and the sociological task of theodicy. European Journal of Social Theory 4(2): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgan, M. S., Kruger, L. and Gigerenzer, G. (1987). The probabilistic revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mulcahy, K. V. (1995). Walt Rostow as National Security Adviser, 1966–69. Presidential Studies Quarterly 25(2): 223–236.Google Scholar

Murrell, P. (1993). What is shock therapy? What did it do in Poland and Russia? Post-Soviet Affairs 9(2): 111–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nadesan, M. H. (2008). Governmentality, biopower, and everyday life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Najemy, J. M. (2010). Introduction. In Najemy, J. M. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nash, S. J. (2003). On pragmatic philosophy and Knightian uncertainty. Review of Social Economy 61(3): 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

NATO. (2008). Bucharest Summit Declaration Issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Bucharest on 3 April 2008. www.summitbucharest.gov.ro/en/doc_201.html [Accessed 2022-04-05].Google Scholar

NATO. (2021). NATO Climate Change and Security Action Plan. 14 June 2021. From www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_185174.htm [Accessed on 2022-11-10].Google Scholar

Nederman, C. J. (1999). Amazing grace: Fortune, God, and free will in Machiavelli’s thought. Journal of the History of Ideas 60(4): 617–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neff, S. C. (2013). Introduction. In Grotius, H. (ed.) On the law of war and peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. xiii–xxxv.Google Scholar

New York Times. (2018). Cyberattacks Put Russian Fingers on the Switch at Power Plants, U.S. Says. 15 March 2018. www.nytimes.com/2018/03/15/us/politics/russia-cyberattacks.html?referringSource=articleShare [Accessed 2021-02-22].Google Scholar

New York Times. (2019). U.S. Escalates Online Attacks on Russia’s Power Grid. 15 June 2019. www.nytimes.com/2019/06/15/us/politics/trump-cyber-russia-grid.html?referringSource=articleShare [Accessed 2021-02-22].Google Scholar

The New York Times. (2021). Christian Prophets Are on the Rise. What Happens When They’re Wrong? www.nytimes.com/2021/02/11/us/christian-prophets-predictions.html?referringSource=articleShare [Accessed 2021-02-15].Google Scholar

Das Nibeliungenlied. (2006). Translated by Burton Raffel. New Haven: Yale University Press, p. 23, line 150.Google Scholar

Nicholson, H. J. (2004). The Crusades. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Das Niebelungenlied 1190/1200 Rohfassung von Karl Bartschs Edition: Der Nibelunge Nôt, mit den Abweichungen von Der Nibelunge Liet, den Lesarten sämmtlicher Handschriften und einem Wörterbuche, 1. Theil: Text, herausgegeben von Karl Bartsch. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus, 1870–1880 nach der Ausgabe. paragraph 150 www.hs-augsburg.de/~harsch/germanica/Chronologie/12Jh/Nibelungen/nib_n_04.html [Accessed 2020-03-23].Google Scholar

Nikitina, Y. (2014). The ‘Color Revolutions’ and ‘Arab Spring’ in Russian Official Discourse. Connections 14(1): 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nowak, M., and Sigmund, K. (1993). A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Nature 364(6432): 56–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oberholzner, F. (2011). From an act of God to an insurable risk: The change in the perception of hailstorms and thunderstorms since the early modern period. Environment and History 17(1): 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Odysseos, L. and Petito, F. (eds.) (2007). The international political thought of Carl Schmitt: Terror, liberal war and the crisis of global order. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oexle, O. G. (1999). The Middle Ages through Modern Eyes. A Historical Problem. The Prothero Lecture. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 9: 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, N. (2012). History in the plural: An introduction to the work of Reinhart Koselleck. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Olshtynskym, L. I. (2020). The science of war: Continuity and modern development. Military Thought (Voennya Mysl) 29(2): 108–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oneal, J. R. and Russett, B. (1999). The Kantian Peace: The Pacific benefits of democracy, interdependence, and international organizations, 1885–1992. World Politics 52(1): 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppenheimer, J. A. (2010). Rational choice theory. In Bevir, M. (ed.) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Poltical Theory, p. 3. www.gvptsites.umd.edu/oppenheimer/research/rct.pdfGoogle Scholar

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. (1990). Charter of Paris for a New Europe, 21 November 1990. See www.osce.org/mc/39516 [Accessed 2021-02-19].Google Scholar

Ormerod, R. (2006). The history and ideas of pragmatism. Journal of the Operational Research Society 57(8): 892–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osiander, A. (2007). Before the state: Systemic political change in the West from the Greeks to the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osiander, A. (2010). Irregulare Aliquod Corpus Et Monstro Simile: Can Historical Comparisons Help Understand the European Union? Available at SSRN Electronic Journal 1648807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osterhammel, J. (2009). Die Verwandlung der Welt. Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts. München: C.H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ordinances against the spread of plague, Pistoia, (1348). (1994). Reprinted in Horrox, R. (ed.) The Black Death (Manchester Medieval Sources). Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 194–203.Google Scholar

Ostwald, J. (2006). Vauban under siege: Engineering efficiency and martial vigor in the War of the Spanish Succession. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Owen, D. and Strong, T. B. (eds.) (2004). Introduction. In Max Weber The Vocation Lectures. ‘Science as a Vocation’, ‘Politics as a Vocation’. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, pp. ix–lxii.Google Scholar

Paine, T. (1998 [1791]). The rights of man. In Rights of man, common sense and other political writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 83–333.Google Scholar

Paret, P. (1966). Yorck and the era of the Prussian Reform, 1807–1815. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paris, R. and Sisk, T. D. (eds.) The dilemmas of statebuilding: Confronting the contradictions of postwar peace operations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, C. F. and Stern, E. K. (2005). Bolt from the blue or avoidable failure? Revisiting September 11 and the origins of strategic surprise. Foreign Policy Analysis 1(3): 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parker, G. and Smith, L. M. (eds.) (1997). The general crisis of the seventeenth century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Parsons, T. (1991). The social system. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pascal, B. (2008 [1670]). Pensées. Oxford: Oxford Classics.Google Scholar

Patch, H. R. (1927). The goddess Fortuna in medieval literature. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paul, A. T. (2001). Organizing Husserl: On the phenomenological foundations of Luhmann’s systems theory. Journal of Classical Sociology 1(3): 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paul, J. (2014). The use of kairos in Renaissance political philosophy. Renaissance Quarterly 67(1): 43–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersen, K. L. and Tjalve, V. S. (2013). (Neo) republican security governance? US homeland security and the politics of ‘shared responsibility’. International Political Sociology 7(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pitkin, H. F. (1999). Fortune is a woman: Gender and politics in the thought of Niccolò Machiavelli. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

de Pizan, C. (1999). The book of deeds of arms and of chivalry. Sumner Willard (Trans.), Charity Canon Willard (ed.) University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar

Plokhy, S. (2018). Lost kingdom – A history of Russian nationalism from Ivan the Great to Vladimir Putin. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. (2003). The Machiavellian moment: Florentine political thought and the Atlantic republican tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pomerantsev, P. (2017). Nothing is true and everything is possible: Adventures in modern Russia. New York: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar

Porter, P. (2013). Military orientalism: Eastern war through Western eyes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Prados, J. (1995). The hidden history of the Vietnam War. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.Google Scholar

Putin, V. (2007). Speech at the Munich Conference on Security. 10 February. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Speech_and_the_Following_Discussion_at_the_Munich_Conference_on_Security_Policy [Accessed 2022-03-18].Google Scholar

Putin, V. (2021). On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians. 12 July 2021. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181 [Accessed 2022-03-17].Google Scholar

Putin, V. (2022a). Address by the President of the Russian Federation. 21 February. en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67828 [Accessed 2022-03-17].Google Scholar

Putin, V. (2022b). www.spectator.co.uk/article/full-text-putin-s-declaration-of-war-on-ukraine [Accessed 2022-03-04].Google Scholar

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. (2022). Russian Officials Predicted a Quick Triumph in Ukraine. Did Bad Intelligence Skew Russian Decision-Making? 11 March 2022. www.rferl.org/a/russia-invasion-ukraine-intelligence-putin/31748594.html [Accessed 2022-03-17].Google Scholar

Rasmussen, D. C. (2014). The pragmatic enlightenment: Recovering the liberalism of Hume, Smith, Montesquieu, and Voltaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, M. V. (2006). The risk society at war: Terror, technology and strategy in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reill, P. H. (2001). The construction of the social sciences in late eighteenth and early nineteenth century Germany. In Heilbron, J., Magnusson, L. and Wittrock, B. (eds.) The rise of the social sciences and the formation of modernity: Conceptual change in context, 1750–1850. Dordrecht: Kluwer academic publishers, pp. 107–140.Google Scholar

Renz, B. (2016). Russia and ‘hybrid warfare’. Contemporary Politics 22(3): 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Report of the Paris Medical Faculty, October 1348. (1994). Reprinted in Horrox, R. (ed.) The Black Death. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 158–163.Google Scholar

Reuters. (2022). Putin’s warning to ‘traitors’ sends chilling message. 17 March. www.reuters.com/world/europe/putins-warning-traitors-sends-chilling-message-2022-03-17/ [Accessed 2022-03-18].Google Scholar

Reynolds, N. and Watling, J. (2022). Ukraine Through Russia’s Eyes. RUSI Commentary, 25 February 2022. https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/ukraine-through-russias-eyes [Accessed 2022-03-17].Google Scholar

Rich, N. (2018). Losing Earth: The Decade We almost Stopped Climate Change. New York Times, 1 August. From www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/01/magazine/climate-change-losing-earth.html [Accessed on 2022-11-10].Google Scholar

Rohr, Christian. (2007). Writing a catastrophe: Describing and constructing disaster perception in narrative sources from the Late Middle Ages. Historical Social Research 32(3): 88–102.Google Scholar

Rollo-Koster, J. (ed.) (2002). Medieval and early modern ritual: Formalized behavior in Europe, China and Japan. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, R., et al. (1984). Habermas and Lyotard on post-modernity. Praxis International 4(1): 32–44.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosa, H. (2005). Beschleunigung: die Veränderung der Zeitstrukturen in der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Rostow, W. W. (1959). The stages of economic growth. The Economic History Review 12 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rostow, W. W. (1990). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rothenberg, G. E. (1986). Moltke, Schlieffen and the doctrine of strategic envelopment. In Paret, P., Craig, G. A. and Gilbert, F. (eds.) Makers of modern strategy: From Machiavelli to the nuclear age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 296–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rüb, F. W. (2012). Politische Entscheidungsprozesse, Kontingenz und demokratischer Dezisionismus. Eine policy-analytische Perspektive. In Toens, K. and Willems, U. (eds.) Politik und Kontingenz. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 117–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, M. J. (1984). The champion’s master in trial by battle. The Journal of Legal History 5(1): 76–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, M. J. (2008). Trial by Battle in the Court of Chivalry. The Journal of Legal History 29(3): 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russian Federation (2021). Agreement on measures to ensure the security of The Russian Federation and member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 17 December. https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/rso/nato/1790803/?lang=en [Accessed 2022-03-28].Google Scholar

Sabbagh, D. (2022). Would Vladimir Putin actually use nuclear weapons? The Guardian, Monday February 28. www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/28/russia-nuclear-weapons-putin-threat [Accessed 2022-03-04].Google Scholar

Saler, M. (2003). ‘Clap if you believe in Sherlock Holmes’: Mass culture and the re-enchantment of modernity, c.1890–c.1940. Historical Journal 46 (3): 599–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saler, M. (2006). Modernity and enchantment: A historiographic review. The American Historical Review 111(3): 692–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salter, M. B. (2019). Horizon Scan: Critical security studies for the next 50 years. Security Dialogue 50(4): 9–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Saxe, M. (1759). Reveries, or Memoirs concerning the art of war. Edinburgh: Printed by Sands, Donaldson, Murray and Cochran for Alexander Donaldson, at Pope’s Head.Google Scholar

Schmidt, C.M. (2003). David Hume: Reason in history. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar