Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-gblv7 Total loading time: 2.603 Render date: 2022-05-23T21:48:40.839Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2019

Emanuel Adler
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
World Ordering
A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution
, pp. 304 - 363
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbate, Janet. 1999. Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 1988a. The System of Professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 1988b. “Transcending General Linear Reality.” Sociological Theory 6 (2): 169–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 1995a. “Sequence Analysis: New Methods for Old Ideas.” Annual Review of Sociology 21: 93113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 1995b. “Things of Boundaries.” Social Research 62 (4): 857–82.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Time Matters: On Theory and Method. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 2005. “The Historicality of Individuals.” Social Science History 29 (1): 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aboulafia, Mitchell. 1999. “A (Neo) American in Paris: Bourdieu, Mead, and Pragmatism.” In Bourdieu: A Critical Reader, edited by Shusterman, R., 153–74. Oxford: Blackwell Oxford.Google Scholar
Aboulafia, Mitchell. 2016. “George Herbert Mead.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/mead/.
Acharya, Amitav. 2004. “How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism.” International Organization 58 (2): 239–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2007. “The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics.” World Politics 59 (4): 629–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2012. “Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time Has Come?The International Spectator 47 (1): 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Amitav, and Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2007. Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Acquisti, Alessandro, Gritzalis, Stefanos, Lambrinoudakis, Costos, and di Vimercati, Sabrina, eds. 2007. Digital Privacy: Theory, Technologies, and Practices. New York: Auerbach.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acuto, Michele, and Curtis, Simon. 2014. “Assemblage Thinking and International Relations.” In Reassembling International Theory, edited by Acuto, Michele and Curtis, Simon, 115. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, W. Neil. 2000. “Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related?Progress in Human Geography 24 (3): 347–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 1986. “Ideas of Progress in International Relations: A Conceptual and Theoretical Analysis.” Unpublished manuscript, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Adler, Emanuel. 1987. The Power of Ideology: The Quest for Technological Autonomy in Argentina and Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 1991. “Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International Relations and Their Progress.” In Progress in Postwar International Relations, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Crawford, Beverly, 4388. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 1992. “The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control.” International Organization 46 (1): 101–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 1997. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 319–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 1998. “Seeds of Peaceful Change: The OSCE’s Security Community-Building Model.” In Security Communities, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael, 119–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2002. “Constructivism and International Relations.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simons, Beth A., 95118. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2005. Communitarian International Relations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2008. “The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post-Cold War Transformation.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (2): 195230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2010. “Europe as a Civilizational Community of Practice.” In Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives, edited by Katzenstein, Peter J., 6790. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. ed. 2012. Israel in the World: Legitimacy and Exceptionalism. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2013. “Constructivism and International Relations.” In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd edition, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simons, Beth A., 112144. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2014. “Epistemic Communities of Practice.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30, Washington, DC.
Adler, Emanuel, and Crawford, Beverly, eds. 1991. Progress in Postwar International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Crawford, Beverly. 2006. “Normative Power: The European Practice of Region Building and the Case of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership.” In The Convergence of Civilizations: Constructing a Mediterranean Region, edited by Adler, Emanuel, Bicchi, Federica, Crawford, Beverly, and Del Sarto, Raffaella, 350. Toronto: Toronto University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Barnett, Michael. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Faubert, Michael. 2018. “Epistemic Communities of Practice.” Draft, University of Toronto.
Adler, Emanuel, and Greve, Patricia. 2009. “When Security Community Meets Balance of Power: Overlapping Regional Mechanisms of Security Governance.” Review of International Studies 35 (S1): 5984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Haas, Peter M.. 1992. “Conclusion: Epistemic Communities, World Order, and the Creation of a Reflective Research Program.” International Organization 46 (1): 367–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent. 2011a. “International Practices: Introduction and Framework.” In International Practices, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, 335. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent. 2011b. “International Practices.” International Theory 3 (1): 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, ed. 2013. Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, 2014a. Opting out of the European Union: Diplomacy, Sovereignty and European Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, 2014b. “Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Relations.” International Organization 68 (1): 239–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Pouliot, Vincent. 2014. “Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (4): 889911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ágh, Attila. 2016. “The Decline of Democracy in East-Central Europe: Hungary as the Worst-Case Scenario.” Problems of Post-Communism 63 (5–6): 277–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Mathias. 2010. “Modern System Theories in World Politics.” In New Systems Theories of World Politics, edited by Albert, Mathias, Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Wendt, Alexander, 4168. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias, and Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2001. “Conclusion.” In Identities, Borders, International Relations: Rethinking International Relations Theory, edited by Mathias, Albert, Jacobson, David, and Lapid, Yosef, 275292. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Alberts, David S., and Czerwinski, Thomas J.. 1997. Complexity, Global Politics, and National Security. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, Howard E., Hodgson, Geoffrey M., Hull, David L., Knudsen, Thorbjørn, Mokyr, Joel, and Vanberg, Viktor J. 2008. “In Defence of Generalized Darwinism.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 18 (5): 577–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, Howard E., and Martinez, Martha. 2003. “Entrepreneurship as Social Construction: A Multi-Level Evolutionary Approach.” In Handbook of Entrepreneurial Research, edited by Acs, Zoltan J. and Audretsch, David B., 359–99. Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006. “Cultural Pragmatics: Social Performance between Ritual and Strategy.” In Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, edited by Alexander, Jeffrey C., Giesen, Berhard, and Mast, Jason L., 2990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2011. Performance and Power. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Alexander, Thomas M. 1987. John Dewey’s Theory of Art, Experience, and Nature. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Alford, John R., Funk, Carolyn L., and Hibbing, John R.. 2005. “Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted?American Political Science Review 99 (2): 153–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, John R., and Hibbing, John R.. 2004. “The Origin of Politics: An Evolutionary Theory of Political Behavior.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 707–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Bentley. 2018. Scientific Cosmology and International Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie. 2006. “Nested and Overlapping Regimes in the Transatlantic Banana Trade Dispute.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (3): 362–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. “The Politics of International Regime Complexity.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, Ash. 2002. “Spatialities of Globalisation.” Environment and Planning A 34 (3): 385–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, Ash, and Cohendet, Patrick. 2004. Architectures of Knowledge: Firms, Capabilities, and Communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 2003. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2006. “The Epistemology of Democracy.” Episteme 3 (1–2): 822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2014. “Dewey’s Moral Philosophy.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dewey-moral/.
Ansell, Christopher K. 2011. Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, John. 1988. The Behavioural Biology of Aggression. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 1982. “Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action.” British Journal of Sociology 33 (4): 455–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 1988. Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 1998. “Realism and Morphogenesis.” In Critical Realism: Essential Readings, edited by Archer, Margaret, Bhaskar, Roy, Collier, Andrew, Lawson, Tony, and Norrie, Alan, 356–82. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 2007. Making Our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1965. On Revolution. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1967. “Truth and Politics.” The New Yorker, February 25.
Arendt, Hannah. 1970. On Violence. Orlando, FL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1973. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Orlando, FL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, vols. I and II, edited by Barnes, J.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 2000. Nicomachean Ethics, translated by Crisp, Roger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnbak, Axel, and van Eijk, Nico A. N. M.. 2012. “Certificate Authority Collapse: Regulating Systemic Vulnerabilities in the HTTPS Value Chain.” Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2031409.CrossRef
Arthur, W. Brian. 1994. “Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality.” The American Economic Review 84 (2): 406–11.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian. 1995. “Complexity in Economic and Financial Markets: Behind the Physical Institutions and Technologies of the Marketplace Lie the Beliefs and Expectations of Real Human Beings.” Complexity 1 (1): 2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian. 1999. “Complexity and the Economy.” Science 284 (5411): 107–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Augier, Mie, and Prietula, Michael. 2007. “Historical Roots of the ‘A Behavioral Theory of the Firm’ Model at GSIA.” Organization Science 18 (3): 507–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1986. “An Evolutionary Approach to Norms.” American Political Science Review 80 (4): 1095–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Cohen, Michael D.. 2000. Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ba, Alice, and Hoffmann, Matthew J., eds. 2005. Contending Perspectives on Global Governance: Coherence and Contestation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baert, Patrick. 1998. Social Theory in the Twentieth Century. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, D., and De Propis, L.. 2004. “A Bridge Too Phare? EU Pre-Accession Aid and Capacity-Building in the Candidate Countries.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (1): 7798.Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A. 2013. “Power and International Relations.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 273–98. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Baldwin, James Mark. 1895. “Consciousness and Evolution.” Science 2: 219–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, James Mark. 1897a. Social and Ethical Interpretations in Mental Development: A Study in Social Psychology. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, James Mark. 1897b. “Organic Selection.” Nature 55.CrossRef
Baldwin, James Mark. 1902. Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, vol. 2. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baldwin, James Mark. 1903. Development and Evolution. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baldwin, James Mark. 1906. Thought and Things: A Study of Development and Meaning of Thought or Genetic Logic. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, James Mark. 1909. Darwin and the Humanities. Baltimore: Review Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Ball, Kirstie, and Snider, Laureen, eds. 2013. The Surveillance-Industrial Complex: A Political Economy of Surveillance. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzacq, Thierry. 2009. “The Frontiers of Governance: Understanding the External Dimension of EU Justice and Home Affairs.” In The External Dimension of EU Justice and Home Affairs: Governance, Neighbours, Security, edited by Balzacq, Thierry, 134. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, Albert. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, Albert. 2001. “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 52 (1): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barab, Sasha A., and Duffy, Thomas. 2000. “From Practice Fields to Communities of Practice.” In The Foundations of Learning Environments, edited by Jonassen, David and Land, Susan, 2555. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Barber, Tony. 2014. “Remembering the Fall of the Berlin Wall.” Financial Times, November 2.
Barnes, Barry. 1995. The Elements of Social Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Barry. 2001. “Practice as Collective Action.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Schatzki, Theodore R., Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Von Savigny, Eike, 1728. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 1998. Dialogues in Arab Politics: Negotiations in Regional Order. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 2009. “Evolution without Progress? Humanitarianism in a World of Hurt.” International Organization 63 (4): 621–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 2010. The International Humanitarian Order. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 2011. Empire of Humanity: A History of Humanitarianism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Janice, Stein. 2017. “Pragmatism, Meaning, and Suffering: Evolutionary Callings and Exhaustions.” Paper presented at the conference “A Celebration of Emanuel Adler’s Scholarship and Career.” Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto, May 12.
Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond. 2005. “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59 (1): 3975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, W. W. 1987. “Philosophy of Biology versus Philosophy of Physics.” In Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge, edited by Radnitzky, Gerard and Bartley, W. W. III, 546. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Bateson, William. 1894. Materials for the Study of Variation. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baumer, Franklin L. 1977. Modern European Thought: Continuity and Change in Ideas, 1600–1950. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 2006. Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 2007. “Beyond Class and Nation: Reframing Social Inequalities in a Globalizing World.” British Journal of Sociology 58 (4): 679705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 2013. German Europe, translated by Livingstone, Rodney. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Beckert, Jens. 2010. “How Do Fields Change? The Interrelations of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets.” Organization Studies 31 (5): 605–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beinhocker, Eric D. 2007. The Origin of Wealth: The Radical Remaking of Economics and What It Means for Business and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R. 2009. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1977. “Die Aufgabe Des Übersetzers.” In Illuminationen: Ausgewählte Schriften, 5062. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bennett, Colin J. 1988. “Different Processes, One Result: The Convergence of Data Protection Policy in Europe and the United States.” Governance 1: 162–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Colin J. 1991. “What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?British Journal of Political Science 21 (2): 215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Luckmann, Thomas. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1910. Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness, translated by Pogson, F. L.. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1998 [1911]. Creative Evolution, translated by Mitchell, Arthur. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George. 1975. Philosophical Works: Including the Works on Vision, edited by Ayers, M. R.. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 1998. The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 2006. The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. 1971. Praxis and Action: Contemporary Philosophy of Human Activity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J. 2018. Why Read Hannah Arendt Now. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J., ed. 1985. Habermas and Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Steven. 2001. The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Steven, and van der Ven, Hamish. 2017. “Best Practices in Global Governance.” Review of International Studies 43 (3): 534–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyerchen, Alan D. 1997. “Clausewitz, Nonlinearity, and the Importance of Imagery.” In Complexity, Global Politics, and National Security, edited by Alberts, David S. and Czerwinski, Thomas J., 7077. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 1997. “On the Ontological Status of Ideas.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27 (2–3): 139–47.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice. 2001. “The Power Politics of Identity.” European Journal of International Relations 7 (3): 349–97.Google Scholar
Bially Mattern, Janice. 2011. “A Practice Theory of Emotion for International Relations.” In International Practices, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, 6386. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchi, Federica. 2006. “‘Our Size Fits All’: Normative Power Europe and the Mediterranean.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (2): 286303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bicchi, Federica. 2014. “Information Exchanges, Diplomatic Networks and the Construction of European Knowledge in European Union Foreign Policy.” Cooperation and Conflict 49 (2): 239–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggart, Nicole Woolsey, and Beamish, Thomas D.. 2003. “The Economic Sociology of Conventions: Habit, Custom, Practice, and Routine in Market Order.” Annual Review of Sociology 29: 443–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigo, Didier. 2013. “Security.” In Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, edited by Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, 114–30. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bilge, Leyla, and Dumitras, Tudor. 2012. “Before We Knew It: An Empirical Study of Zero-Day Attacks in the Real World.” In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 833–44. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 2015. “The Politics of Centralizing Power in the Fed.” Monkey Cage blog. Washington Post, March 10.
Binder, Sarah, and Spindel, Mark. 2013. “Monetary Politics: Origins of the Federal Reserve.” Studies in American Political Development 27 (1): 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, Susan. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bloor, David. 2001. “Wittgenstein and the Priority of Practice.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Schatzki, Theodore R., Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Von Savigny, Eike, 95106. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blumberg, Phillip I. 1986. “Limited Liability and Corporate Groups.” Journal of Corporation Law 11 (4): 573631.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. 1986. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2006. “Great Punctuations: Prediction, Randomness, and the Evolution of Comparative Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 493–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2011. “Ideas, Uncertainty, and Evolution.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, edited by Béland, Daniel and Cox, Robert Henry, 83104. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blyth, Mark, Hodgson, Geoffrey M., Lewis, Orion, Steinmo, Sven, et al. 2011. “Introduction to the Special Issue on the Evolution of Institutions.” Journal of Institutional Economics 7 (3): 299315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockman, Johanna, and Eyal, Gil. 2002. “Eastern Europe as a Laboratory for Economic Knowledge: The Transnational Roots of Neoliberalism.” American Journal of Sociology 108 (2): 310–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, James. 2014. “Jürgen Habermas.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/habermas/.
Boltanski, Luc. 2011. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc. 2012. Love and Justice as Competences: Three Essays on the Sociology of Action. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Chiapello, E.. 2006. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Thévenot, Laurent. 2000. “The Reality of Moral Expectations: A Sociology of Situated Judgement.” Philosophical Explorations 3 (3): 208–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Thévenot, Laurent. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, Robert. 1975. “Plato’s Distinction between Being and Becoming.” Review of Metaphysics 29 (1): 6695.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanya A., ed. 2006. The Disparity of European Integration: Revisiting Neofunctionalism in Honour of Ernst B. Haas. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanya A., and Risse, Thomas. 2007. “Venus Approaching Mars? The European Union as an Emerging Civilian World Power.” Paper presented at European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Conference, May 17–19.
Börzel, Tanya A., and Risse, Thomas. 2009. The European Union and the Diffusion of Ideas. KFG Working Paper, Freie University, Berlin.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanya A., and Risse, Thomas. 2012a. “From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction.” West European Politics 35 (1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanya A., and Risse, Thomas. 2012b. “When Europeanisation Meets Diffusion: Exploring New Territory.” West European Politics 35 (1): 192207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. 2013. “Comparative Regionalism: European Integration and Beyond.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 502–30. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A., and van Hüllen, Vera. 2015. “Towards a Global Script? Governance Transfer by Regional Organizations.” In Governance Transfer by Regional Organizations, edited by Börzel, Tanja A. and van Hüllen, Vera, 321. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1978. Ecodynamics: A New Theory of Societal Evolution. Beverly Hills, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1973. “Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction.” In Knowledge, Education and Cultural Change, edited by Brown, Richard, 71112. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, translated by Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practices. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996. “Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction.” In Knowledge, Education and Cultural Change, edited by Brown, Richard, 71112. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loïc. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bouris, Dimitry, and Schumacher, Tobias. 2016. The Revised European Neighbourhood Policy: Continuity and Change in EU Foreign Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, John. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, John. 2005. “Culture, Adaptation.” In The Innate Mind, vol. 2: Culture and Cognition, edited by Carruthers, Peter, Laurence, Stephen, and Stich, Stephen, 2338. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brachthäuser, Christine. 2011. “Explaining Global Governance: A Complexity Perspective.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 24 (2): 221–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradie, Michael, and Harms, William. 2012. “Evolutionary Epistemology.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Available at http://stanford.library.usyd.edu.au/archives/win2015/entries/epistemology-evolutionary/.
Brake, David. 2014. Sharing Our Lives Online: Risks and Exposure in Social Media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, Jordan. 2011. “Mapping the Sovereign State: Technology, Authority, and Systemic Change.” International Organization 65 (1): 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brand, Fridolin Simon, and Jax, Kurt. 2007. “Focusing the Meaning(s) of Resilience: Resilience as a Descriptive Concept and a Boundary Object.” Ecology and Society 12 (1): 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael E. 2014. Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Susan. 2007. “The Council of Europe’s Convention on Cybercrime.” In Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment, edited by Balkin, Jack, Grimmelmann, James, Katz, Eddan, Kozlovski, Nimrod, Wagman, Shlomit, and Zarsky, Tal, 268–85. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Brey, Philip. 2014. “The Physical and Social Reality of Virtual Worlds.” In The Oxford Handbook of Virtuality, edited by Grimshaw, Mark, 4353. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris. 1992. International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris. 2010. Practical Judgment in International Political Theory: Selected Essays. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, John Seely, and Duguid, Paul. 1991. “Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation.” Organization Science 2 (1): 4057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, John Seely, and Duguid, Paul. 2000. The Social Life of Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Brown, John Seely, and Duguid, Paul. 2001. “Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective.” Organization Science 12 (2): 198213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Don S. 1980. Pluralism and Personality: William James and Some Contemporary Cultures of Psychology. London: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. 2010. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. 2011a. “Interactional International Law and the Practice of Legality.” In International Practices, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, 108–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. 2011b. “Interactional International Law: An Introduction.” International Theory 3 (2): 307–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, William D. 2015. International Conflict and Cyberspace Superiority: Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Büger, Christian. 2014. “Boundary Concepts and the Interaction of Communities of Practice: Cases from the Security-Development Nexus, Political Concepts.” Working Paper Series. Cardiff.
Büger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank. 2014. International Practice Theory: New Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Büger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank. 2015. “The Play of International Practice.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (3): 449–60.Google Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada. 2002. Legitimacy and Power Politics: The American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Society. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, Robert. 2014. “Charles Sanders Peirce.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosopy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Available at http://stanford.library.usyd.edu.au/archives/spr2016/entries/peirce/.
Burns, Tom R., and Dietz, Thomas. 1992. “Cultural Evolution: Social Rule Systems, Selection and Human Agency.” International Sociology 7 (3): 259–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Per-Olof, and Jörgens, Helge. 2005a. “International Patterns of Environmental Policy Change and Convergence.” European Parliament 15 (2): 80101.Google Scholar
Busch, Per-Olof, and Jörgens, Helge. 2005b. “The International Sources of Policy Convergence: Explaining the Spread of Environmental Policy Innovations.” Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5): 860–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, David. 2016. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2005. “Not Hanging Separately: Responses to Dunne and Adler.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34 (1): 183–94.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Barry Jones, R. J.. 1981. Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. 2013. “The Global Transformation: The Nineteenth Century and the Making of Modern International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 57 (3): 620–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Lawson, George. 2015. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Waever, Ole. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, David. 1998. Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrne, David. 2005. “Complexity, Configurations and Cases.” Theory, Culture and Society 22 (5): 95111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabantous, Laure, and Gond, Jean-Pascal. 2011. “Rational Decision Making as Performative Praxis: Explaining Rationality’s Eternel Retour.” Organization Science 22 (3): 573–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, Michel. 1981. “Pour une Sociologie des Controverses Technologiques.” Fundamenta Scientiae 2 (3/4): 381–99.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Sociological Review Monograph, edited by Law, John, 196233. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel. 2007. “What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative?” In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by MacKenzie, Donald, Muniesa, Fabian, and Siu, Lucia, 311–57. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1960. “Blind Variation and Selective Retention in Creative Thought as in Other Knowledge Processes.” Psychological Review 67 (6): 380400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, Donald T. 1965. “Variation and Selective Retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution.” In Social Change in Developing Areas: A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory, edited by Barringer, Herbert R., Blanksten, George I., and Mack, Raymond W., 2627. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1974a. “Evolutionary Epistemology.” In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, edited by Schlipp, Paul A., 413–63. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1974b. “Unjustified Variation and Selective Retention in Scientific Discovery.” In Studies in the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ayala, Francisco J. and Dobzhansky, Theodosius, 139–61. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1987. “Selection Theory and the Sociology of Scientific Validity.” In Evolutionary Epistemology, edited by Callebaut, W. and Pinxten, R.. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kelly, Martin, and Garcia-Swartz, Daniel D.. 2013. “The History of the Internet: The Missing Narratives.” Journal of Information Technology 28 (1): 1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caporaso, James A. 2007. “The Promises and Pitfalls of an Endogenous Theory of Institutional Change: A Comment.” West European Politics 30 (2): 392404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsnaes, Walter. 1992. “The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis.” International Studies Quarterly 36 (3): 245–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Archie B. 2015. “Corporate Social Responsibility: The Centerpiece of Competing and Complementary Frameworks.” Organizational Dynamics 44 (2): 8796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Archie B., and Shabana, Kareem M.. 2010. “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice.” International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (1): 85105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Bruce. 1996. City of Capital: Politics and Markets in the English Financial Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 2002. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caygill, Howard. 1999. “Non-Epistemic Chance: Karl Popper’s Ontology.” Tekhnema Fall. Available at tekhnema.free.fr/5Caygill.html.
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 1994. “Emergent Polarity: Analyzing State-Formation and Power Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 38 (4): 501–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 1997. Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2004. “Conquest and Regime Change: An Evolutionary Model of the Spread of Democracy and Peace.” International Studies Quarterly 48 (3): 603–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chancellor, Edward. 1999. Devil Take the Hindmost: A History of Financial Speculation. New York: Farrar and Giroux.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred Dupont. 1960. “Development, Diversification, and Decentralization.” In Postwar Economic Trends in the United States, edited by Freeman, R. E., 237–88. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred Dupont. 1990. Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred Dupont. 1992. “What Is a Firm? A Historical Perspective.” European Economic Review 36 (2–3): 483–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, Evan, and English, William. 2013. “Genopolitics and the Science of Genetics.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 382–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001. “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change.” International Organization 55 (3): 553–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2005. “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.” International Organization 59 (4): 801–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernoff, Fred. 2009. “Defending Foundations for International Relations Theory.” International Theory 1 (3): 466–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, Robert. 1995. “From Modern to Postmodern Organizational Analysis.” Organization Studies 16 (4): 579604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, Robert. 1996. “The Problem of Reflexivity in Organizational Research: Towards a Postmodern Science of Organization.” Organization 31 (1): 3159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, Robert. 1997. “Essai: Thirty Years on: From Organizational Structures to the Organization of Thought.” Organization Studies 18 (4): 685707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, Robert. 1999. “A ‘Rhizomic’ Model of Organizational Change and Transformation: Perspective from a Metaphysics of Change.” British Journal of Management 10 (3): 209–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, Robert. 2002. “Essai: Time, Duration and Simultaneity; Rethinking Process and Change in Organizational Analysis.” Organization Studies 23 (6): 863–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, Robert, and MacKay, Brad. 2007. “Post-Processual Challenges for the Emerging Strategy-as-Practice Perspective: Discovering Strategy in the Logic of Practice.” Human Relations 60 (1): 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choucri, Nazli. 2012. Cyberpolitics in International Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciccotello, Conrad S. 2014. “The State of the Public Corporation: Not So Much an Eclipse as an Evolution.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 26 (4): 821.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy, and Chalmers, David. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis 58 (1): 719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, David. 2010. “Characterizing Cyberspace: Past, Present and Future.” MIT CSAIL 1: 2016–28.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S., and Cook, James M.. 1999. “Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change.” Annual Review of Sociology 25: 441–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clough, Jonathan. 2012. “The Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime: Defining ‘Crime’ in a Digital World.” Criminal Law Forum 23 (4): 363–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clough, Jonathan. 2014. “A World of Difference: The Budapest Convention on Cybercrime and the Challenges of Harmonisation.” Monash University Law Review 40 (3): 698736.Google Scholar
Coe, Neil M., and Brunell, Timothy G.. 2003. “‘Spatializing’ Knowledge Communities: Towards a Conceptualization of Transnational Innovation Networks.” Global Networks 3 (4): 437–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Harlan G. 2015. “International Precedent and the Practice of International Law.” In Negotiating State and Non-State Law: The Challenge of Global and Local Legal Pluralism, edited by Helfand, Michael A., 268–89. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1993. “Analogy, Homology and Metaphors in the Interactions between Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences, Especially Economics.” In Non-Natural Social Science: Reflecting on the Enterprise of More Heat than Light, edited by de Marchi, Neil, 744. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. Bernard. 1994. “An Analysis of Interactions between the Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences.” In The Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences, edited by Cohen, I. Bernard, 1100. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ira. 1987. “Structuration Theory and Social Praxis.” In Social Theory Today, edited by Giddens, Anthony and Turner, Jonathan H., 273308. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L. 2012. Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colapietro, Vincent. 2009. “A Revised Portrait of Human Agency: A Critical Engagement with Hans Joas’s Creative Appropriation of the Pragmatic Approach.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 1 (1): 124.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dyamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, H. M. 2001. “What Is Tacit Knowledge?” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Schatzki, Theodore R., Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Von Savigny, Eike, 107–19. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Comte, Auguste. 2009 [1853]. The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, William. 2011. A World of Becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, S. D. N., and Brown, John Seely. 1999. “Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing.” Organization Science 10 (4): 381400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, S. D. Noam, and Wagenaar, Hendrik. 2012. “Navigating the Eternally Unfolding Present: Toward an Epistemology of Practice.” American Review of Public Administration 42 (1): 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Michael J., Gulen, Huseyin, and Ovtchinnikov, Alexei V.. 2010. “Corporate Political Contributions and Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance 65 (2): 687724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John. 1987. “From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link.” In The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, edited by Dupre, John, 277306. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda, Tooby, John, and Barkow, Jerome H.. 1992. “Introduction: Evolutionary Psychology and Conceptual Integration.” In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, edited by Barkow, Jerome H., Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John, 315. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cowles, Maria Green, Caporaso, James A., and Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 2001. Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Andrew. 2005. “What Are Communities of Practice? A Comparative Review of Four Seminal Works.” Journal of Information Science 31 (6): 527–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Robert W. 1986. “Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History.” In Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by Keohane, Robert O., 204–54. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W., and Sinclair, Timothy J.. 1996. Approaches to World Order. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Beverly. 1991. “Toward a Theory of Progress in International Relations.” In Progress in Postwar International Relations, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Crawford, Beverly, 438–68. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cudworth, Erika, and Hobden, Stephen. 2011. Posthuman International Relations: Complexity, Ecologism and Global Politics. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Erika, and Hobden, Stephen. 2012. “The Foundations of Complexity, the Complexity of Foundations.” Philosophy and the Social Sciences 42 (2): 163–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cudworth, Erika, and Hobden, Stephen. 2013. “Complexity, Ecologism, and Posthuman Politics.” Review of International Studies 39 (3): 643–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, and Rosenau, James N.. 1989. Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Benjamin. 2004. “Creativity, Habit, and the Social Products of Creative Action: Revising Joas, Incorporating Bourdieu.” Sociological Theory 22 (4): 603–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY.” American Economic Review 77 (2): 332–37.Google Scholar
Dawes, Christopher T., and Fowler, James H.. 2009. “Partisanship, Voting, and the Dopamine D2 Receptor Gene.” Journal of Politics 71 (30): 1157–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1983. “Universal Darwinism.” In Evolution from Molecules to Man, edited by Bendall, D. S., 403–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1989. The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1996. The Blind Watchmaker: Why the Evidence of Evolution Reveals a Universe without Design. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
De Chardin, Pierre. 1959. The Phenomenon of Man. London: Collins.Google Scholar
De Jaegher, Hanne, Di Paolo, Ezequiel, and Gallagher, Shaun. 2010. “Can Social Interaction Constitute Social Cognition?Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (10): 441–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deeks, Ashley. 2016. “Intelligence Services, Peer Constraints, and the Law.” In Global Intelligence Oversight: Governing Security in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Goldman, Zachary K. and Rascoff, Samuel J., 336. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deibert, Ronald. 2012. “Growing Dark Side of Cyberspace (… and What to Do about It).” Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs 1 (20): 260–74.Google Scholar
Deibert, Ronald. 2013. Black Code: Inside the Battle for Cyberspace. Toronto: Signal.Google Scholar
Deibert, Ronald. 2015. “The Geopolitics of Cyberspace after Snowden.” Current History 114 (768): 915.Google Scholar
Deibert, Ronald, Palfrey, John, Rohozinski, Rafal, and Zittrain, Jonathan, eds. 2010. Access Controlled: The Shaping of Power, Rights, and Rule in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deibert, Ronald J., and Crete-Nishihata, Masashi. 2012. “Global Governance and the Spread of Cyberspace Controls.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 18 (3): 339–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deibert, Ronald J., and Rohozinski, Rafal. 2010. “Risking Security: Policies and Paradoxes of Cyberspace Security.” International Political Sociology 4 (1): 1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deibert, Ronald J., and Rohozinski, Rafal. 2012. “Cyclones in Cyberspace: Information Shaping and Denial in the 2008 Russia–Georgia War.” Security Dialogue 43 (1): 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLanda, Manuel. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
DeNardis, Laura, and Raymond, Mark. 2013. “Thinking Clearly about Multistakeholder Internet Governance.” Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2354377.CrossRef
Dennett, Daniel C. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meaning of Life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Depew, David J., and Weber, Bruce H.. 1985. “Innovation and Tradition in Evolutionary Theory: An Interpretive Afterword.” In Evolution at a Crossroads, edited by Depew, David J. and Weber, Bruce H., 227–60. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Deppe, Kristen Diane, Stoltenberg, Scott F., Smith, Kevin B., and Hibbing, John R.. 2013. “Candidate Genes and Voter Turnout: Further Evidence on the Role of 5-HTTLPR.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 375–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessler, David. 1989. “What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?International Organization 43 (3): 441–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deudney, Daniel, and Ikenberry, G. John. 1999. “Realism, Structural Liberalism, and the Western Order.” In Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War, edited by Kapstein, Ethan B. and Mastanduno, Michael, 105–23. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W., et al. 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W., 1963. The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1916. Democracy and Education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1922. Human Nature and Conduct. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1929. The Quest for Certainty. New York: Milton, Balch.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1960 [1929]. The Quest for Certainty: A Study on the Relation of Knowledge and Action. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1983. John Dewey: The Middle Works, 1899–1924, edited by Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1988. The Middle Works of John Dewey, vol. 12: 1899–1924. 1920: Reconstruction in Philosophy and Essays (Collective Works of John Dewey), edited by Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 2008. The Later Works of John Dewey, vol. 4: 1925–1953. 1929: The Quest for Certainty (Collective Works of John Dewey), edited by Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John, and Bentley, Arthur. 1949. Knowing and the Known. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Diffie, Whitfield, and Landau, Susan Eva. 2007. Privacy on the Line: The Politics of Wiretapping and Encryption. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, Thomas, and Burns, Tom R.. 1992. “Human Agency and the Evolutionary Dynamics of Culture.” Acta Sociologica 35 (3): 187200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality on Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1991. “Introduction.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W., 144. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, Simmons, Beth, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2007. “The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, Coercion, Competition or Learning?Annual Review of Sociology 33: 449–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius Grigorievich. 1955. Evolution, Genetics, and Man. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Theodosius Grigorievich. 1962. Mankind Evolving: The Evolution of the Human Species. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dolowitz, David P., and Marsh, David. 2000. “Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making.” Governance 13 (1): 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2012. “The Elements of the Structures of International Systems.” International Organization 66 (4): 609–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, Giovanni. 1988. “Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation.” Journal of Economic Literature 26 (3): 1120–71.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2001. “Globalization and Policy Convergence.” International Studies Review 3 (1): 5378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drieschova, Alena. 2016. “Change of International Orders: Empire, Balance of Power, and Liberal Governance.” PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
Drieschova, Alena. 2017. “Peirce’s Semeiotics: A Methodology for Bridging the Material-Ideational Divide in IR Scholarship.” International Theory 9 (1): 3366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duguid, Paul. 2005. “‘The Art of Knowing’: Social and Tacit Dimensions of Knowledge and the Limits of the Community of Practice.” Information Society 21 (2): 109–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumouchel, Joelle. 2016. “Regulating International Finance: The Genesis and Transformation of Central Bank Practices.” PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
Dunbar, Robin I. M. 2007. “Evolution and the Social Sciences.” History of the Human Sciences 20 (2): 2950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, Tim. 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, Tim. 2005. “International Society and World Society: How Does It All Hang Together?Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35 (1): 157–70.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim, Flockhart, Trine, and Koivisto, Marjo. 2013. “Introduction: Liberal World Order.” In Liberal World Orders, edited by Dunne, Tim and Flockhart, Trine, 122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, William H. 1991. Coevolution: Genes, Culture, and Human Diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1902. Moral Education, translated by Wilson, Everett K. and Schnurer, Herman. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1915. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1938. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1993. Ethics and the Sociology of Morals. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 2014 [1893]. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1991. Regarding Politics: Essays on Political Theory, Stability, and Change. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald M. 1987. Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Edsall, Thomas B. 2017. “Democracy Can Plant the Seeds of Its Own Destruction.” New York Times, October 19.
Efinger, Manfred, and Zürn, Michael. 1990. “Explaining Conflict Management in East-West Relations: A Quantitative Test of Problem-Structural Typologies.” In International Regimes in East-West Politics, edited by Rittberger, Volker, 6489. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel Noah. 2000. “Multiple Modernities.” Daedalus 129 (1): 129.Google Scholar
Eldredge, Niles, and Gould, S. J.. 1972. “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.” In Models in Paleobiology, edited by Schopf, Thomas J. M., 82115. San Francisco: Freeman Cooper.Google Scholar
El-Hani, Charbel Niño, and Pihlström, Sami. 2002. “Emergence Theories and Pragmatic Realism.” Essays in Philosophy 3 (2): article 3. Available at https://commons.pacificu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1061&context=eip.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1956. “Problems of Involvement and Detachment.” British Journal of Sociology 7 (3): 226–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1978. What Is Sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1991. The Symbol Theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 2000. The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 2001. The Society of Individuals. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Elkjaer, Bente, and Simpson, Barbara. 2006. “Towards a Pragmatic Theory of Creative Practice.” Paper presented at the Second Organization Studies Summer Workshop, Return to Practice: Understanding Organization as It Happens, Mykonos, Greece, June 15–16.
Elliott, Euel, and Kiel, L. Douglas. 1997. “Nonlinear Dynamics, Complexity, and Public Policy: Use, Misuse, and Applicability.” In Chaos, Complexity, and Sociology: Myths, Models, and Theories, edited by Eve, Raymond A., Horsfall, Sara, and Lee, Mary E., 6478. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Elsenbroich, Corinna, and Gilbert, Nigel. 2014. “We-Intentionality.” In Modelling Norms, 185–97. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1982. “The Case for Methodological Individualism.” Theory and Society 11: 453–82.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1983. Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989a. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989b. “Social Norms and Economic Theory.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (4): 99117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989c. The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (2): 281317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Goldberg, Chad Alan. 2005. “Pragmatism, Bourdieu, and Collective Emotions in Contentious Politics.” Theory and Society 34 (5–6): 469518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Johnson, Victoria. 2008. “Bourdieu and Organizational Analysis.” Theory and Society 37 (1): 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Mische, Ann. 1998. “What Is Agency?American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 9621023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enderlein, Hendrik, Wӓlti, Sonja, and Zürn, Michael, eds. 2010. Handbook on Multi-Level Governance. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Andreas K., Maye, Alexander, Kurthen, Martin, and König, Peter. 2013. “Where’s the Action? The Pragmatic Turn in Cognitive Science.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (5): 202–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eppink, Derk Jan. 2007. Life of a European Mandarin: Inside the Commission. Tielt, Belgium: Lannoo.Google Scholar
Erskine, Toni, ed. 2003. Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, Toni, 2008. Embedded Cosmopolitanism: Duties to Strangers and Enemies in a World of Dislocated Communities. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estlund, David. 2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esty, Daniel C., and Porter, Michael E.. 1998. “Industrial Ecology and Competitiveness.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 2 (1): 3543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew. 1999. Unarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Eweje, Gabriel. 2006. “Environmental Costs and Responsibilities Resulting from Oil Exploitation in Developing Countries: The Case of the Niger Delta of Nigeria.” Journal of Business Ethics 69 (1): 2756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezrahi, Yaron. 2012. Imagined Democracies: Necessary Political Fictions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagerberg, Jan. 2003. “Schumpeter and the Revival of Evolutionary Economics: An Appraisal of the Literature.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13 (2): 125–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, Eugene F., and Jensen, Michael C.. 1983. “Separation of Ownership and Control.” Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 301–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feather, Norman T. 1982. “Human Values and the Prediction of Actions: An Expectancy-Valence Analysis.” In Expectations and Actions, 263–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Niall. 2010. “Complexity and Collapse: Empires on the Edge of Chaos.” Foreign Affairs 89: 118.Google Scholar
Fernbach, Philip, and Sloman, Steven. 2017. “Why We Believe Obvious Untruths.” New York Times, March 2.
Fincham, Robin, and Clark, Timothy. 2009. “Introduction: Can We Bridge the Rigour-Relevance Gap?Journal of Management Studies 46 (3): 510–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, J. N. 2013. Hegel: A Re-Examination. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. “Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism.” International Organization 50 (2): 325–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioretos, Orfeo. 2011. “Historical Institutionalism in International Relations.” International Organization 65 (2): 367–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioretos, Orfeo, Falletti, Tulia G., and Sheingate, Adam. 2016. “Historical Institutionalism in Political Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, edited by Fioretos, Orfeo, Falletti, Tulia G., and Sheingate, Adam, 330. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fioretos, Orfeo, Falletti, Tulia G., and Sheingate, Adam, eds. 2016. The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 2010. “Pragmatism’s Gift.” New York Times, March 15.
Fiske, Susan T., and Taylor, Shelley E.. 2013. Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, Ludwik. 1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and McAdam, Doug. 2011. “Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields.” Sociological Theory 29 (1): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fligstein, Neil, and McAdam, Doug. 2012. A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florini, Ann. 1996. “The Evolution of International Norms.” International Studies Quarterly 40 (3): 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcese, Craig. 2015. “Law, Logarithms, and Liberties: Legal Issues Arising from CSE’s Metadata Collection Initiatives.” In Privacy, and Surveillance in Canada in the Post-Snowden Era, edited by Geist, Michael A., 127–62. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The Order of Things. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. Archeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1984. The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Fowler, James H., and Dawes, Christopher T.. 2008. “Two Genes Predict Voter Turnout.” Journal of Politics 70 (3): 579–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H., and Dawes, Christopher T.. 2013. “In Defense of Genopolitics.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 362–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Stephen. 2000. “Communities of Practice, Foucault and Actor-Network Theory.” Journal of Management Studies 37 (6): 853–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frega, Roberto. 2012. “The Practice-Based Approach to Normativity of Frederick L. Will.” Transcripts of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (4): 483511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frega, Roberto. 2017. “Pragmatism and Democracy in a Global World.” Review of International Studies 43 (4): 720–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Gerald. 2005. Review of Kathleen Thelen “How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 59 (1): 170–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton.1970. “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.” New York Times Magazine, September 13, 122–26. Available at umich.edu/~thecore/doc/Friedman.pdf.
Frost, Mervyn. 1996. Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Mervyn. 2003. “Constitutive Theory and Moral Accountability: Individuals, Institutions, and Dispersed Practices.” In Can Institutions Have Responsibilities? Collective Moral Agency and International Relations, edited by Erskine, Toni, 8499. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Mervyn. 2009a. “Ethical Competence in International Relations.” Ethics and International Affairs 23 (2): 91100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Mervyn. 2009b. Global Ethics: Anarchy, Freedom and International Relations. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, and Lechner, Silviya. 2016a. “Understanding International Practices from the Internal Point of View.” International Political Theory 12 (3): 299319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, and Lechner, Silviya. 2016b. “Two Concepts of International Practice: Aristotelian Praxis or Wittgensteinian Language-Games?Review of International Studies 42 (2): 334–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Stephan. 1992. The Professional Quest for Truth: A Social Theory of Science and Knowledge. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 1989. “The End of History?National Interest 16: 318.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1969. The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gadinger, Frank. 2017. “The Normativity of International Practices.” Centre for Global Cooperation Research, University of Duisburg-Essen.
Garfinkel, Alan. 1984. Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik, and Lindsay, Jon R.. 2017. “Thermonuclear Cyberwar.” Journal of Cybersecurity 3 (1): 3748.Google Scholar
Gat, Azar. 2008. War in Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gat, Azar. 2009. “So Why Do People Fight? Evolutionary Theory and the Causes of War.” European Journal of International Relations 15 (4): 571–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, Frank W., and Schot, Johan. 2010. “The Dynamics of Transitions: A Socio-Technical Perspective.” In Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long-Term Transformative Change, edited by Grin, John, Rotmans, Jan, and Schot, Johan, 11104. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geer, Daniel E. 2007. “The Physics of Digital Law: Searching for Counterinuitive Analogies.” In Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment, edited by Balkin, Jack, Grimmelmann, James, Katz, Eddan, Kozlovski, Nimrod, Wagman, Shlomit, and Zarsky, Tal, 1336. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gelderblom, Oscar, and Jonker, Joost. 2004. “Completing a Financial Revolution: The Finance of the Dutch East India Trade and the Rise of the Amsterdam Capital Market, 1595–1612.” Journal of Economic History 64 (3): 641–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertler, Brie. 2017. “Self-Knowledge.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/self-knowledge/.
Geyer, Robert. 2003. “Beyond the Third Way: The Science of Complexity and the Politics of Choice.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5 (2): 237–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheciu, Alexandra. 2005. “Security Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the ‘New Europe.’” International Organization 59 (4): 9731012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherardi, Silvia. 2008. “Situated Knowledge and Situated Action: What Do Practice-Based Studies Promise?” In The Sage Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization, edited by Barry, Daved and Hansen, Hans, 516–25. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gherardi, Silvia. 2009. “Communities of Practice or Practices of a Community?” In Handbook of Management Learning, Education and Development, edited by Armstrong, Steven J. and Fukami, Cynthia V., 514–30. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gherardi, Silvia, Nicolini, Davide, and Odella, Francesca. 1998. “Toward a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organizations the Notion of Situated Curriculum.” Management Learning 29 (3): 273–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 2001. “Intentions as Emergent Products of Social Interactions.” In Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition, edited by Malle, Bertram F., Moses, Louis J., and Baldwin, Dare A., 105–22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1986. “Action, Subjectivity, and the Constitution of Meaning.” Social Research 53 (3): 529–45.Google Scholar
Gilady, Lilach, and Hoffmann, Matthew J.. 2013. “Darwin’s Finches or Lamarck’s Giraffe: Does International Relations Get Evolution Wrong?International Studies Review 15 (3): 307–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2005. “The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (1): 84101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret. 1992. On Social Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret. 2014. Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gillman, Max, and Eade, Tim. 1995. “The Development of the Corporation in England, with Emphasis on Limited Liability.” International Journal of Social Economics 22 (4): 2032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladwell, Malcolm. 2002. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Ward, Michael D.. 2006. “Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization.” International Organization 60 (4): 911–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, James. 1988. Choas: Making a New Science. New York: Viking-Penguin.Google Scholar
Glen, Carol M. 2014. “Internet Governance: Territorializing Cyberspace?Politics and Policy 42 (5): 635–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. 2009. “Brokering Change: Networks and Entrepreneurs in International Politics.” International Theory 1 (2): 249–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1956. The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior in Public Place. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1983. “The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address.” American Sociological Review 48 (1): 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin, and Blanchard, Thomas. 2016. “Social Epistemology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/epistemology-social/.
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Tim, Wu. 2006. Who Controls the Internet? Illusions of a Borderless World. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gontier, Nathalie. 2006. “Evolutionary Epistemology and the Origin and Evolution of Language: Taking Symbiogenesis Seriously.” In Evolutionary Epistemology, Language and Culture: A Non-Adaptationist, Systems Theoretical Approach, edited by Gontier, Nathalie, van Bendegem, Jean Paul, and Aerts, Diederek, 195226. Rotterdam: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Barbara. 1978. Social Science and Utopia. Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay, and Eldredge, Niles. 1977. “Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered.” Paleobiology 3 (2): 115–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay, and Lewontin, Richard C.. 1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 205 (1161): 581–98.Google Scholar
Grabbe, Heather. 2002. “Stabilizing the East While Keeping Out the Easterners: Internal and External Security Logics in Conflict.” In Migration and the Externalities of European Integration, edited by Lavenex, Sandra and Uçarer, Emek M., 91104. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Grabbe, Heather. 2014. “Six Lessons of Enlargement Ten Years On: The EU’s Transformative Power in Retrospect and Prospect.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (S1): 4056.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1978. “Threshold Models of Collective Behavior.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (6): 1420–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Great Chain of Being Sure about Things.” The Economist, October 31.
Greenhouse, Linda. 2016. “The Facts Win Out on Abortion.” New York Times, June 29.
Greenwald, Glenn. 2014. No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the US Surveillance State. Toronto: Signal.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner, and Laitin, David. 2003. “How Do Self-Enforcing Institutions Endogenously Change?” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Greif, Avner, and Laitin, David. 2004. “A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change.” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 633–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grodzins, Morton. 1957. “Metropolitan Segregation.” Scientific American 197 (4): 3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronow, Antti. 2011. From Habits to Social Structures: Pragmatism and Contemporary Social Theory. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Neil. 2009. “A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms.” American Sociological Review 74 (3): 358–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunitsky, Seva. 2013. “Complexity and Theories of Change in International Politics.” International Theory 5 (1): 3563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunitsky, Seva. 2017. Aftershocks: Great Powers and Domestic Reforms in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano. 2000. “A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 6 (2): 147–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano. 2010. “Imposing Coherence: The Central Role of Practice in Friedrich Kratochwil’s Theorising of Politics, International Relations and Science.” Journal of International Relations and Development 13 (3): 301–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano. 2016. “International Political Sociology, or: The Social Ontology and Power Politics of Process.” In Routledge Handbook of International Political Sociology, edited by Guillaume, Xavier and Bilgin, Pinar, 368–77. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan. 2006. Pragmatism, Old and New: Selected Writings. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan, and Kolenda, Konstantin. 1977. “Two Fallibilists in Search of the Truth.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 51: 63104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1964. Beyond the Nation-State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1980. “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes.” World Politics 32 (3): 357405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1982. “Words Can Hurt You; Or, Who Said What to Whom about Regimes.” International Organization 36 (2): 207–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1983. “Regime Decay: Conflict Management and International Organizations, 1945–1981.” International Organization 37 (2): 189256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1984. “What Is Progress in the Study of International Organization?” Mimeo. Published in Japanese in Kokusai Seiji: 11–46.
Haas, Ernst B. 1986. “What Is Nationalism and Why Should We Study It.” International Organization 40 (3): 707–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1990. When Knowledge Is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 1997. Nationalism, Liberalism, and Progress, vol. 1: The Rise and Decline of Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Ernst B. 2000. Nationalism, Liberalism, and Progress, vol. 2: The Dismal Fate of New Nations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1989. “Do Regimes Matter? Epistemic Communities and Mediterranean Pollution Control.” International Organization 43 (3): 377403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992a. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46 (1): 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992b. “Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone.” International Organization 46 (1): 187224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M., and Haas, Ernst B.. 2002. “Pragmatic Constructivism and the Study of International Institutions.” Millennium 31 (3): 573601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2: The Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, translated by Burger, Thomas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Community Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. “Further Reflections on the Public Sphere.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Calhoun, Craig J., 421–61. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haeckel, Ernst Heinrich Philipp August. 1905. The Wonders of Life: A Popular Study of Biological Philosophy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Haken, Hermann. 1990. “Synergetics as a Tool for the Conceptualization and Mathematization of Cognition and Behaviour: How Far Can We Go?” In Synergetics of Cognition, edited by Haken, Hermann and Stadler, Michael, 231. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, John R., Grindstaff, Laura, and Lo, Ming-Cheng, eds. 2010. Handbook of Cultural Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., ed. 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A., 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., 2003. “Aligning Ontology and Methodology in Comparative Research.” In Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, edited by Mahoney, James and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, 373406. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David. 2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism.” In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David, 168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce. 1999. National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce. 2008. Central Banking as Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce. 2017. “Deontic Power, Authority, and Governance in International Politics.” International Politics 1–27.
Halpern, Paul, Trebilcock, Michael, and Turnbull, Stuart. 1980. “An Economic Analysis of Limited Liability in Corporation Law.” University of Toronto Law Journal 30 (2): 117–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. 1964. “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour. I.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7 (1):116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hancock, Emily. 2007. “CALEA: Does One Size Still Fit All?” In Cybercrime: Digital Cops in a Networked Environment, edited by Balkin, Jack, Grimmelmann, James, Katz, Eddan, Kozlovski, Nimrod, Wagman, Shlomit, and Zarsky, Tal, 184206. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hannan, Michael T. and Freeman, John. 1984. “Structural Inertia and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review 49 (2): 149–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, Michael T. and Freeman, John. 1989. Organization Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harari, Yuval Noah. 2016. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. Toronto: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom. 1993. Social Reality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom, and Gillett, Grant. 1994. The Discursive Mind. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Harrison, Neil H., ed. 2006. Complexity in World Politics: Concepts and Methods of a New Paradigm. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter, and Rittberger, Volker. 1996. “Interests, Power, Knowledge: The Study of International Regimes.” Mershon International Studies Review 40 (2): 177228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haukkala, Hiski. 2011. “The European Union as a Regional Normative Hegemon: The Case of European Neighbourhood Policy.” In Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by Whitman, Richard G., 4564. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Carl R. 1993. Charles S. Peirce’s Evolutionary Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Carl R. 2002. “Charles Peirce’s Evolutionary Realism as a Process Philosophy.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 38 (1–2): 1327.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. 1996. “Narrating Crisis: The Discursive Construction of ‘The Winter of Discontent.’” Sociology 30 (2): 253–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, Michael V. 2016. Playing to the Edge: American Intelligence in the Age of Terror. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1973. Law, Legislation and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1979. The Counter-Revolution of Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich August. 1989. “The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism.” In The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, vol.1. edited by Bartley, W. W. II. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Healey, Jason, ed. 2013. A Fierce Domain: Conflict in Cyberspace, 1986 to 2012. Vienna, VA: Cyber Conflict Studies Association.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1977. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 2007. Hegel’s Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time, translated by Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1971. Poetry, Language, Thought, translated by Hofstadter, Albert. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Hellmann, Gunther. 2009. “Beliefs as Rules for Action: Pragmatism as a Theory of Thought and Action.” International Studies Review 11 (3): 638–62.Google Scholar
Helmreich, Stefan. 1998. Silicon Second Nature: Culturing Artificial Life in a Digital World. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph. 2016. The Secret of Our Success: Domesticating Our Species and Making Us Smarter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, Geoffrey. 2007. “Cyberspace and Sovereignty: Thoughts on Physical Space and Digital Space.” In Power and Security in the Information Age: Investigating the Role of the State in Cyberspace, edited by Cavelty, Myriam Dunn, Mauer, Victor, and Krishna-Hensel, Sai Felicia, 6794. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Esther, Call, Josep, Hernàndez-Lloreda, María Victoria, Hare, Brian, and Tomasello, Michael. 2007. “Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis.” Science 317 (5843): 1360–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heylighen, Francis. 1992. “Evolution, Selfishness and Cooperation: Selfish Memes and the Evolution of Cooperation.” Journal of Ideas 2 (4): 7084.Google Scholar
Heylighen, Francis. 2009. “Self Organization.” Principia Cybernetica Web. Available at http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/SELFORG.html.
Hildebrand, David L. 2008. Dewey: A Beginner’s Guide. Oxford: One World Publications.Google Scholar
Hillman, Robert W. 1997. “Limited Liability in Historical Perspective.” Washington and Lee Law Review 54 (2): 613–27.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Michal Ben-Josef. 2014. “Ideational Change and the Emergence of the International Norm of Truth and Reconciliation Commissions.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (3): 810–33.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, and Curley, Edwin. 1994. Leviathan: With Selected Variants from the Latin Edition of 1668. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey Martin. 1993. Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey Martin. 2006. “What Are Institutions?Journal of Economic Issues 40 (1): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey Martin. 2007. “Institutions and Individuals: Interaction and Evolution.” Organization Studies 28 (1): 95116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M., and Knudsen, Thorbjorn. 2004. “The Firm as an Interactor: Firms as Vehicles for Habits and Routines.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14 (3): 281305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M., and Knudsen, Thorbjorn. 2006a. “Dismantling Lamarckism: Why Descriptions of Socio-Economic Evolution as Lamarckian Are Misleading.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics (16) 4: 343–66.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M., and Knudsen, Thorbjorn. 2006b. “Why We Need a Generalized Darwinism and Why a Generalized Darwinism Is Not Enough.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 61 (1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M., and Knudsen, Thorbjorn. 2007. “Evolutionary Theorizing beyond Lamarckism: A Reply to Richard Nelson.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17 (3): 353–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M., and Knudsen, Thorbjorn. 2010. Darwin’s Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofferberth, Matthias, and Weber, Christian. 2015. “Lost in Translation: A Critique of Constructivist Norm Research.” Journal of International Relations and Development 18 (1): 75103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew J. 2006. “Beyond Regime Theory: Complex Adaptation and Global Environmental Governance.” In Global Complexity: Agent-Based Models in Global and International Issues, edited by Harrison, Neil, 95120. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew J. 2012. Ozone Depletion and Climate Change: Constructing a Global Response. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew J., and Riley, John. 2002. “The Science of Political Science: Linearity or Complexity in Designing Social Inquiry.” New Political Science 24 (2): 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, John H. 1992. “Complex Adaptive Systems.” Daedalus 121 (1): 1730.Google Scholar
Holland, John H. 1995. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. New York: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Holland, John H. 1998. Emergence: From Chaos to Order. New York: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Holland, John H. 1999. “Echoing Emergence: Objectives, Rough Definitions, and Speculations for Echo-Class Models.” In Complexity, 309–42. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Holling, E. 1976. “Resilience and Stability in Ecosystems.” In Evolution and Consciousness: Human Systems in Transition, edited by Jantsch, Erich and Waddington, Conrad H., 7392. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Hollis, Martin, and Smith, Steve. 1991. “Beware of Gurus: Structure and Action in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 17 (4): 393410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmstrom, Bengt, and Kaplan, Steven N.. 2001. “Corporate Governance and Merger Activity in the United States: Making Sense of the 1980s and 1990s.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (2): 121–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, K. J. 2016. “The Problem of Change in International Relations Theory.” In Kalevi Holsti: A Pioneer in International Relations Theory, Foreign Policy Analysis, History of International Order, and Security Studies, edited by Hans Mosbach, Günter, 3755. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R., Siverson, Randolph M., and George, Alexander L.. 1980. Change in the International System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Holzinger, Katharina, and Knill, Christoph. 2005. “Causes and Conditions of Cross-National Policy Convergence.” Journal of European Public Policy 12 (5): 775–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1992. “Integrity and Disrespect: Principles of a Conception of Morality Based on the Theory of Recognition.” Political Theory 20 (2): 187201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1998. “Democracy as Reflexive Cooperation: John Dewey and the Theory of Democracy Today.” Political Theory 26 (6): 763–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 2007. “Recognition as Ideology.” In Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, edited by Van den Brink, Bert and Owen, David, 323–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23 (1): 171200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, Ted. 2002. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted. 2010. “The Logic of Habit in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 16 (4): 539–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, Ted. 2013. “Common-Sense Constructivism and Hegemony in World Politics.” International Organization 67 (2): 317–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopf, Ted. 2018. “Change in International Practices.” European Journal of International Relations 24 (3): 687711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Michael C. 2010. “Nonstate Actors and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Suicide Terrorism.” International Organization 64 (1): 3364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houmansadr, Amir, Riedl, Thomas J., Borisov, Nikita, and Singer, Andrew C.. 2013. “I Want My Voice to Be Heard: IP over Voice-over-IP for Unobservable Censorship Circumvention.” In the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS). Available at www.freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/ndss13-freewave.pdf.
Howard, Philip N. 2015. Pax Technica: How the Internet of Things May Set Us Free or Lock Us Up. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hronešová, Jessie. 2016. “Might Makes Right: War-Related Payments in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10 (3): 339–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, David L. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1988. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principle of Morals, edited by Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Paul. 1985. “Why Propensities Cannot Be Probabilities.” Philosophical Review 94 (4): 557–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53 (2): 379408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 1995. “Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics.” Review of International Studies 21 (4): 331–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2007a. On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2007b. “One World? Many Worlds? The Place of Regions in the Study of International Society.” International Affairs 83 (1): 127–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2011. “The Theory and Practice of Global Governance: The Worst of All Possible Worlds?International Studies Review 13 (1): 144–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheon, Pat Duffy. 1995. “Popper and Kuhn on the Evolution of Science.” Brock Review 4 (1–2): 2837.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian. 1942. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Ibert, Oliver, and Müller, Felix C.. 2015. “Network Dynamics in Constellations of Cultural Differences: Relational Distance in Innovation Processes in Legal Services and Biotechnology.” Research Policy 44 (1): 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001a. After Victory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001b. “American Power and the Empire of Capitalist Democracy.” Review of International Studies 27 (5): 191212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American International Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2016. “The Rise, Character, and Evolution of International Order.” In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, edited by Fioretos, Orfeo, Falletti, Tulia G., and Sheingate, Adam, 538552. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2017. “The Plot against American Foreign Policy: Can the Liberal Order Survive?Foreign Affairs 96 (2): 29.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2018. “The End of Liberal International Order?International Affairs 94 (1): 723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iser, Mattias. 2013. “Recognition.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/recognition/.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2010. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, and Nexon, Daniel H.. 1999a. “Relations before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 5 (3): 291332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, and Nexon, Daniel H.. 1999b. “Paradigmatic Faults in International-Relations Theory.” International Studies Quarterly 53 (4): 907–30.Google Scholar
Jacobi, Wade. 2001. “Tutors and Pupils: International Organizations, Central European Elites, and Western Models.” Governance 14 (2): 169200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Adam B., Peterson, Steven R., Portney, Paul R., and Stavins, Robert N.. 1995. “Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?Journal of Economic Literature 33 (1): 132–63.Google Scholar
James, William. 1882. “Rationality, Activity and Faith.” Princeton Review 2: 5886.Google Scholar
James, William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology, vol. 1. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
James, William. 1907. “Pragmatism’s Conception of Truth.” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 4 (6): 141–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, William. 1977 [1909]. A Pluralistic Universe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jansen, Julia. 2005. “Phantasy’s Systematic Place in Husserl’s Work: On the Condition of Possibility for a Phenomenology of Experience.” In Edmund Husserl: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, edited by Bernet, Rudolf, Welton, Donn, and Zavolta, Gina, 221–44. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jantsch, Eric. 1975. Design for Evolution: Self-Organization and Planning in the Life of Human Systems. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Jantsch, Eric. 1981. The Evolutionary Vision: Toward a Unifying Paradigm of Physical, Biological, and Socio-Cultural Evolution. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Charlie, and Rowe, Carolyn. 2014. “Bringing the Territory Back In: Towards a New Understanding of the Regional Dimension of the European Union.” In The Oxford Handbook of the European Union, edited by Jones, Erik, Menon, Anand, and Weatherill, Stephen, 749–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenrich, Joseph. 2016. The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Michael C., and Murphy, Kevin J.. 1990. “Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives.” Journal of Political Economy 98 (2): 225–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jepperson, R. L. 1991. “Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Powell, Walter and DiMaggio, Paul J., 143–63. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, Soeren, and Hansen, Michael W.. 2004. “Environmental Upgrading of Third World Enterprises through Linkages to Transnational Corporations: Theoretical Perspectives and Preliminary Evidence.” Business Strategy and the Environment 13 (4): 261–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1972. “Consistency in Foreign Policy Views.” In Communication in International Politics, edited by Merritt, Richard, 272–94. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1997. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1985. George Herbert Mead: A Contemporary Re-Examination of His Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1990a. “Giddens’ Critique of Functionalism.” In Anthony Giddens: Consensus and Controversy, edited by Clark, Jon, Modgil, Celia, and Modgil, Sohan, 91102. Brighton: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1990b. “The Creativity of Action and the Intersubjectivity of Reason: Mead’s Pragmatism and Social Theory.” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26 (2): 165–94.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans, and Knöbl, Wolfgang. 2009. Social Theory: Twenty Introductory Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2001. “Treating International Institutions as Social Environments.” International Studies Quarterly 45(4): 487515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2008. Social States: China in International Relations, 1980–2000. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Roy E. 1981. “The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure.” Review of International Studies 7 (1): 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordana, Jacint, and Levi-Faur, David. 2005. “The Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism in Latin America: Sectoral and National Channels in the Making of a New Order.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598 (1): 102–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordana, Jacint, Levi-Faur, David, and Marin, Fernández Xavier i. 2011. “The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Agencies: Channels of Transfer and Stages of Diffusion.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (10): 1343–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juusola, Katariina, Kettunen, Kerttu, and Alajoutsijärvi, Kimmo. 2015. “Accelerating the Americanization of Management Education: Five Responses from Business Schools.” Journal of Management Inquiry 24 (4): 347–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, translated by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Fred. 2016. Dark Territory: The Secret History of Cyber War. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Steven N., and Strömberg, Per. 2009. “Leveraged Buyouts and Private Equity.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (1): 121–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, David Jason. 2009. “Facts and Values in Politics and Searle’s Construction of Social Reality.” Contemporary Political Theory 8 (2): 152–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, David Jason. 2013. “The Location of International Practices: What Is Human Rights Practice?Review of International Studies 39 (4): 969–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1989. Industry and Politics in West Germany: Toward the Third Republic. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1990. “Analyzing Change in International Politics: The New Institutionalism and the Interpretive Approach.” Paper presented as a guest lecture at the MPI für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln, April 5.
Katzenstein, Peter J. ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 2010. “A World of Plural and Pluralistic Civilizations: Multiple Actors, Traditions, and Practices.” In Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives, edited by Katzenstein, Peter, 140. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., and Seybert, Lucia A., eds. 2018. Protean Power: Exploring the Uncertain and Unexpected in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart A. 1993. The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart A. 1995. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kavalski, Emilian. 2007. “The Fifth Debate and the Emergence of Complex International Relations Theory: Notes on the Application of Complexity Theory to the Study of International Life.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20 (3): 435–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavalski, Emilian. 2012. “Complexity and Public Policy: A New Approach to Twenty-First Century Politics, Policy and Society – by Robert Geyer and Samir Rihani.” Political Studies Review 10 (1): 136–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margeret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2008. “Assessing the Complex Evolution of Norms: The Rise of International Election Monitoring.” International Organization 62 (2): 221–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1982. “The Demand for International Regimes.” International Organization 36 (2): 325–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1993. “Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War.” In Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, edited by Baldwin, David A., 269300. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, Amalia D. 2003. “Limited Liability in Context: Lessons from the French Origins of the American Limited Partnership.” Journal of Legal Studies 32 (2): 511–48.Google Scholar
Kessler, Oliver, and Herborth, Benjamin. 2013. “Recognition and the Constitution of Social Order.” International Theory 5 (1): 155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Oliver, and Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2012. “Systems Theory beyond Explaining and Understanding.” In New Systems Theories of World Politics, edited by Albert, Mathias, Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Wendt, Alexander, 2343. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Khurana, Rakesh, and Spender, J. C.. 2012. “Herbert A. Simon on What Ails Business Schools: More than ‘a Problem in Organizational Design.’” Journal of Management Studies 49 (3): 619–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilpinen, Erkki. 2008. “Pragmatism as a Philosophy of Action.” Paper presented at the First Nordic Pragmatism Conference, Helsinki, Finland, June 2–4.
King, Rachael. 2017. “US Invests $258 Million in Supercomputing Race with China.” Wall Street Journal, June 15.
Kleinrock, Leonard. 2010. “An Early History of the Internet.” IEEE Communications Magazine 48 (8): n.p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knafo, Samuel. 2016. “Bourdieu and the Dead End of Reflexivity: On the Impossible Task of Locating the Subject.” Review of International Studies 42 (1): 2547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Will. 2017. “AI Fight Club Could Help Save Us from a Future of Super-Smart Cyberattacks.” MIT Technology Review, July 20.
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How Scientists Make Sense. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2001. “Objectual Practice.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Schatzki, Theodore R., Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Von Savigny, Eike, 175–88. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2005. “Complex Global Microstructures: The New Terrorist Societies.” Theory, Culture and Society 22 (5): 213–34.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Bruegger, Urs. 2002. “Global Microstructures: The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets.” American Journal of Sociology 107 (4): 905–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondratiev, N. D., and Stolper, W. F. 1935. “The Long Waves in Economic Life.” Review of Economic Statistics 17 (6): 105–15.Google Scholar
Kornprobst, Markus. 2014. “From Political Judgements to Public Justifications (and Vice Versa): How Communities Generate Reasons upon Which to Act.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (1): 192216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2003. “The Dependence of Value on Humanity.” In The Practice of Value by Joseph Raz, edited by Wallace, R. Jay, 6385. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koschut, Simon. 2014. “Emotional (Security) Communities: The Significance of Emotion Norms in Inter-Allied Conflict Management.” Review of International Studies 40 (3): 533–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostman, James. 1987. “Aristotle’s Definition of Change.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 4 (1): 316.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1982. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” International Organization 36 (2): 185205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics.” Comparative Politics 16 (2): 223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2007. “Of False Promises and Good Bets: A Plea for a Pragmatic Approach to Theory Building (the Tartu Lecture).” Journal of International Relations and Development 10 (1): 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2011. “Making Sense of ‘International Practices.’” In International Practices, edited by Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, 3660. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, and Ruggie, John Gerard. 1986. “A State of the Art on an Art of the State.” International Organization 40 (4): 753–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Elizabeth M. 1998. The Metaphysics of Experience: A Companion to Whitehead’s Process and Reality. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus. 1986. “Dissipative Structure.” Principia Cybernetica. Available at http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ASC/DISSIP_STRUC.html.
Krueger, Joel. 2011. “Extended Cognition and the Space of Social Interaction.” Consciousness and Cognition 20 (3): 643–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kugler, Jacek, and Organski, Abramo F. K.. 1989. “The Power Transition: A Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation.” In Handbook of War Studies, edited by Midlarsky, Manus I., 171–94. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuklick, Bruce. 1977. The Rise of American Philosophy: Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1860–1930. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kupchan, Charles A. 2012. “The Democratic Malaise: Globalization and the Threat to the West.” Foreign Affairs, January/February: 62–67.
Kupchan, Charles A., and Trubowitz, Peter L.. 2013. “American Statecraft in an Era of Domestic Polarisation.” In After Liberalism? The Future of Liberalism in International Relations, edited by Friedman, Rebekka, Oksanian, Kevork, and Pacheco Pardo, Ramon, 117–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kustermans, Jorg. 2016. “Parsing the Practice Turn: Practice, Practical Knowledge, Practices.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44 (2): 175–96.Google Scholar
Kuyper, Jonathan W. 2014. “Global Democratization and International Regime Complexity.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (3): 620–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porte, Todd R. 1975. “Organized Social Complexity: Explication of a Concept.” In Organized Social Complexity: Challenge to Politics and Policy, edited by La Porte, Todd R., 339. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lachmann, Niels. 2010. “NATO-CSDP-EU Relations: Sketching the Map of a Community of Practice.” Notes de Recherche du CEPSI 34. Centre for Internatonal Peace and Security Studies, McGill University and University of Montreal.
Lachmann, Niels. n.d. “Communities of Practice and the Dynamics of Relations among International Governmental Organizations.” Available at www.academia.edu/2267599/Communities_of_practice_and_the_dynamics_of_relations_between_international_governmental_organizations.
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2011. “Why ‘isms’ Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (2): 465–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamarck, Jean-Baptiste. 1815–22. Histoire Naturelle des Animaux sans Vertèbres. Paris: Verdière.Google Scholar
Lane, David, and Maxfield, Robert. 1996. “Strategy under Complexity: Fostering Generative Relationships.” Long Range Planning 29 (2): 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, David, and Maxfield, Robert. 1997. “Forsight, Complexity and Strategy.” In The Economy as a Complex, Evolving System, edited by Arthur, W. Bryan, Durlauf, Steven, and Lane, David, 169–98. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Lapid, Yosef. 2001. “Identities, Borders, Orders: Nudging International Relations Theory in a New Direction.” In Identities, Borders, International Relations: Rethinking International Relations Theory, edited by Mathias, Albert, Jacobson, David, and Lapid, Yosef, 120. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Edward John. 2004. Evolution: The Remarkable History of a Scientific Theory. New York: Random House Digital.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Whittlesey House.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar