Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T14:51:13.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - A world of indicators: The making of governmental knowledge through quantification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

Richard Rottenburg
University of Halle
Sally Engle Merry
New York University
Richard Rottenburg
Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
Sally E. Merry
New York University
Sung-Joon Park
Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
Johanna Mugler
Universität Bern, Switzerland
Get access



Why another contribution to metrology?

There is something new about the use of quantitative knowledge for governing social life in the twenty-first century. In the words of Alain Desrosières in this volume, ‘the recent extension of the use of [such] indicators by New Public Management raises new questions and introduces a discontinuity in the longstanding traditional usage of statistics by governments, which dates back to the eighteenth century’.

From the United Nations’ efforts to improve the statistical capacity of resource-poor countries to local school districts’ penchant for measuring children's achievements in order to evaluate teachers, governance increasingly requires numerical data. Quantitative evidence is seen as essential for developing reasonable policy at local, national and international levels. The promise of evidence-based policy-making is that it is not only more objective and less prone to misuse, but also more transparent, more democratic, and more open to public debate than decisions taken by politicians and business leaders with reference to qualitative forms of knowing. Yet, the creation of these systems is rarely transparent or public. The rapid development and proliferation of more and more sophisticated measurement and quantification systems pose crucial questions about how knowledge produced by measurement and quantification influences the ways we set the norms we wish to follow, the technologies and instruments we regard as indispensable for organising collective life, and the role numeric representation should play in contemporary world orders (Rottenburg 2000; Espeland and Stevens 2008; Heintz 2010; Merry 2011).

The broad field of numeric representation – here used synonymously with quantification and with measurement as the translation of (assumed) realities into numbers – includes various elementary forms of counting and measuring along with several increasingly sophisticated forms of aggregating numbers. As a study in metrology, this book focuses on the making and use of indicators as one of these forms. The word ‘index’ is often used for aggregated indicators but also frequently synonymously with ‘indicator’ and hence refers to the same type of numeric representation. Indicators and indexes used in governance are a particular form of quantification that focuses primarily on finding an answer to policy questions such as: ‘Is our intervention making an impact? Is this the impact we want?’.

The World of Indicators
The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification
, pp. 1 - 33
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Berg, Marc 1997. Rationalizing Medical Work: Decision Support Techniques and Medical Practices. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe, Hughes, Thomas and Pinch, Trevor 1987/1993. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Bloor, David 1976/1991. Knowledge and Social Imagery. 2nd edn, London: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey and Star, Susan Leigh 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Bruno, Isabelle and Didier, Emmanuel 2013. Benchmarking: l'État sous pression statistique. Paris: Éditions La DécouverteGoogle Scholar
Bruno, Isabelle, Didier, Emmanuel and Prévieux, Julien 2014. Statactivisme: comment lutter avec des nombres. Paris: Editions La DécouverteGoogle Scholar
Brunsson, Nils and Jacobsson, Bengt (eds.) 2000. A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Callon, Michel, Millo, Yuval and Muniesa, Fabian 2007. Market Devices. Chichester: Wiley BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Bruce G. and Espeland, Wendy Nelson 1991. ‘Accounting for Rationality: Double-Entry Bookkeeping and the Rhetoric of Economic Rationality’, American Journal of Sociology 97(1): 31–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine 1988. Classical Probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Desrosières, Alain 1998. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; original in French 1993Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Sauder, Michael 2007. ‘Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds’, American Journal of Sociology 113(1): 1–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Sauder, Michael 2014. Fear of Falling: How Media Rankings Changed Legal Education in America. Russell Sage Foundation, forthcoming
Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Stevens, Mitchell L. 2008. ‘A Sociology of Quantification’, European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie 49(3): 401–36Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy Nelson and Vannebo, Berit Irene 2007. ‘Accountability, Quantification and Law’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3: 21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1966/1973. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage BooksGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian 1975. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas about Probability Induction and Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heintz, Bettina 2010. ‘Numerische Differenz. Überlegungen zu einer Soziologie des (quantitativen) Vergleichs’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 39(3): 162–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Kregg 2011. Guerrilla Auditors: The Politics of Transparency in Neoliberal Paraguay. Durham N.C.: Duke University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopwood, Anthony and Miller, Peter 1994. Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kopp, Johannes and Schäfers, Bernhard 1995. Grundbegriffe der Soziologie. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; chapter on ‘Figuration’ written by Norbert Elias, pp. 75–8Google Scholar
Krüger, Lorenz, Daston, Lorraine J. and Heidelberger, Michael (eds.) 1987. The Probabilistic Revolution, vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald A., Muniesa, Fabian and Siu, Lucia 2007. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Mennicken, Andrea and Vollmer, Hendrik (eds.) 2007. ‘Zahlenwerk. Kalkulation, Organisation und Gesellschaft’, Fokus ‘Herrschaft der Zahlen 1’ and ‘Herrschaft der Zahlen 2’. WestEnd Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung
Merry, Sally Engle 2006. ‘Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle’, American Anthropologist 108(1): 38–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle 2011. ‘Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance’, Current Anthropology 52(S3): 83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle and Coutin, Susan 2014. ‘Technologies of Truth in the Anthropology of Conflict’, American Ethnologist 41(1): 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W. and Rowan, Brian 1977/1991. ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’ in Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, pp. 41–62Google Scholar
Miller, Peter 2001. ‘Governing by Numbers: Why Calculative Practices Matter’, Social Research 68(2): 379–96Google Scholar
Miller, Peter, Hopper, Trevor and Laughlin, Richard 1991. ‘The New Accounting History: An Introduction’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 16(5–6): 395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Thomas and Rose, Nikolas 2003. ‘Do the Social Sciences Create Phenomena? The Example of Public Opinion Research’, British Journal of Sociology 50(3): 367–96Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary 1998. A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Theodore 1986. The Rise of Statistical Thinking 1820–1900. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Porter, Theodore 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Porter, Theodore 2012. ‘Thin Description: Surface and Depth in Science and Science Studies’, Osiris 27: 209–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, Michael 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Prince, Jane Ruth and Marsland, Rebecca 2014. Making and Unmaking Public Health in Africa: Ethnographic and Historical Perspectives. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University PressGoogle Scholar
Rottenburg, Richard 2000. ‘Accountability for Development Aid’ in Kalthoff, Herbert, Rottenburg, Richard and Wagener, Hans-Jürgen (eds), Facts and Figures: Economic Representations and Practices. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag, pp. 143–73Google Scholar
Rottenburg, Richard 2009a. Far-Fetched Facts: A Parable of Development Aid, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press (first published in German in 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottenburg, Richard 2009b. ‘Social and Public Experiments and New Figurations of Science and Politics in Postcolonial Africa’, Postcolonial Studies 12(4): 423–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottenburg, Richard 2012. ‘On Juridico-political Foundations of Meta-codes’ in Renn, Jürgen (ed.), The Globalization of Knowledge in History. Berlin: Max Planck Research Library for the History and Development of Knowledge, pp. 483–500Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven and Schaffer, Simon 1985. Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Speich Chassé, Daniel 2013. Die Erfindung des Bruttosozialprodukts. Goettingen: Vandenhoek and RuprechtGoogle Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn (ed.) 2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. London and New York: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turshen, Meredeth 1999. Privatizing Health Services in Africa. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats