Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Åkerman, Nordal. On the Doctrine of Limited War. Lund: Berlingska Boktryckeriet, 1972.Google Scholar
Akers, Joshua K. “Limited War, Limited Enthusiasm: Sexuality, Disillusionment, Survival, and the Changing Landscape of War Culture in Korean War-era Comic Books and Soldier Iconography.” MA thesis, James Madison University, 2013.
Albert, Stuart and Luck, Edward C., eds. On the Endings of Wars. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Alexander, Martin S. and Keiger, John F. V.. “France and the Algerian War: Strategy, Operations, and Diplomacy.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 25, No. 2 (2002): 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Martin S. and Keiger, John F. V. “Limiting Arms, Enforcing Limits: International Inspections and the Challenges of Compellance in Germany Post-1919, Iraq Post-1991.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 29, No. 2 (2006): 345–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blight, James G.“‘Limited’ Nuclear War?: The Unmet Psychological Challenge of the American Catholic Bishops.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 10, No. 4 (autumn 1985): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boemke, Manfred F., Chickering, Roger, and Förster, Stig, eds. Anticipating Total War: The German and American Experiences, 1871–1914. German Historical Institute. Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesche, Roger. “Kautilya’s Arthaśāstra on War and Diplomacy in Ancient India.” The Journal of Military History, Vol. 67, No. 1 (January 2003): 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolger, Daniel. Why We Lost: A General’s Inside Account of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2014.Google Scholar
Bond, Brian. War and Society in Europe, 1870–1970. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Boulé II, John R. “Operational Planning and Conflict Termination.” JFQ (Joint Force Quarterly) (autumn–winter, 2001–02): 97–102.CrossRef
Bracken, Paul. “War Termination.” In Carter, Ashton B., Steinbruner, John D., and Zraket, Charles A., eds. Managing Nuclear Operations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute, 1987, 197–214.Google Scholar
Braestrup, Peter. “Limited Wars and the Lessons of Lebanon.”The Reporter, Vol. 20 (April 30, 1959): 25–27.Google Scholar
Braim, Paul F.The Will to Win: The Life of General James A. Van Fleet. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Bratton, Patrick C. “When Is Coercion Successful? And Why Can’t We Agree on It?” Naval War College Review, Vol. 58, No. 3 (summer 2005): 99–120.Google Scholar
Brazier-Creagh, K. R. “Limited War.” Brassey’s Annual (1957): 35–45.
Breines, Norman. “The Debate on Limited War, 1957–1959: A Study of Attitudes.” MA thesis, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, 1961.
Brennan, Brian W. “Limited vs. Total War.” Armor, Vol. 111, No. 5 (September–October 2002): 8–11.Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard. Escalation and the Nuclear Option. Princeton University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard. General André Beaufre on Strategy: A Review of Two Books.Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1965.Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard. “Learning to Fight a Limited War.” In Gerbering, William P. and Brodie, Bernard. The Political Dimension in Strategy: Five Papers.Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Press, 1968, 26–32. Reprinted from Los Angeles Times (December 3, 1967).Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard. The Meaning of Limited War. US Air Force Project Rand Research Memorandum, RM-2224. Santa Monica CA: RAND, 1958.Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard. “Politique de dissuasion et guerre limitée.” Politique étrangère, No. 6 (1990): 543–552.Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard. Review essay, “More about Limited War.” World Politics, Vol. 10, No. 1 (October 1957): 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, Bernard. Strategy in the Nuclear Age. Princeton University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard. “Unlimited Weapons and Limited War.” The Reporter, Vol. 8 (November 18, 1954): 16–21.Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard. War and Politics. New York: Macmillan, 1973.Google Scholar
Brom, Shlomo and Elran, Meir, eds. The Second Lebanon War: Strategic Perspectives. Tel Aviv: Institute for National Security Studies, 2007.Google Scholar
Brooks, David C. “Lessons from Limited Wars. Cutting Losses: Ending Limited Interventions.” Parameters, Vol. 43, No. 3 (2013): 99–110.Google Scholar
Brown, Arthur E.“The Strategy of Limited War.” In Lykke, Arthur F.Jr., ed. Military Strategy: Theory and Application (Carlisle Barracks, PA: United States Army War College, 1993), 213–227. Reprinted from Military Strategy, Vol. 3 (August 1973): 25–40.Google Scholar
Brown, Neville. Limited World War? Canberra Papers on Strategy and Defence, No. 32. Canberra: Australian National University, 1984.Google Scholar
Broyles, Arthur A., Wigner, Eugene P., and Drell, Sidney D.. “Civil Defense in Limited War – A Debate.” Physics Today, Vol. 29, No. 44 (1976): 44–57.Google Scholar
Carr, Eldon. The Role of the Military in Ending Limited War. USAWC Research Paper. Carlisle Barracks, PA: US Army War College, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Berenice A. “How Wars End: An Analysis of Some Current Hypotheses.” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 6, No. 4 (1969): 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Berenice A. “War Termination and Conflict Theory: Value Premises, Theories, and Policies.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 392 (November 1970): 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, Steven. Selling the Korean War: Propaganda, Politics, and Public Opinion in the United States, 1950–1953. Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, Robert. M.“Why Great Powers Fight Small Wars Badly.”Military Review, Vol. 82, No. 5 (September–October 2000): 41–53.Google Scholar
Catudal, Honoré M.Soviet Nuclear Strategy from Stalin to Gorbachev: A Revolution in Soviet Military and Political Thinking. Berlin: Arno Spitz, 1988.Google Scholar
Chandran, D. Suba. Limited War: Revisiting Kargil in the Indo–Pak Conflict.Safdarjung Enclave, India: India Research Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Chandran, D. Suba. “Limited War with Pakistan: Will It Secure India’s Interests?” ACDIS Occasional Paper. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne: Program in Arms Control, Disarmament, and International Security, August 2004.
Changwen, Chai. “The Korean Truce Negotiations.” In Li, Millett, and Yu, trans. and eds. Mao’s Generals Remember Korea, 184–232.
Chatterjee, Partha. “On the Rational Choice Theory of Limited Strategic War.” The Journal of Political Science, Vol. 34, No. 2 (April–June 1973): 157–172.Google Scholar
Check, Terence. “‘Clean’ Bombs and ‘Limited’ War: Edward Teller’s Cold War Arguments.” In Klumpp, James F., ed. Argument in a Time of Change: Definitions, Frameworks, and Critiques. Annandale, VA: National Communications Association, 1998, 304–309.Google Scholar
Cheema, Zafar Iqbal. “The Strategic Context of the Kargil Conflict: A Pakistani Perspective.” In Lavoy, ed. Asymmetric Warfare in South Asia, 41–63.CrossRef
Chickering, Roger. “Total War: The Use and Abuse of a Concept.” In Boemke, Chickering, and Förster, eds. Anticipating Total War, 13–28.CrossRef
Chickering, Roger and Förster, Stig. “Introduction.” In Chickering and Förster, eds., The Shadows of Total War, 1–9.CrossRef
Chickering, Roger and Förster, Stig, eds. Great War, Total War: Combat and Mobilization on the Western Front, 1914–1918 (Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chickering, Roger and Förster, StigThe Shadows of Total War: Europe, East Asia, and the United States, 1919–1939. German Historical Institute. Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chickering, Roger, Förster, Stigand Greinder, Bernd, eds. A World at Total War: Global Conflict and the Politics of Destruction, 1937–1945 (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Chu, Shulong, “The PRC Girds for Limited, High-Tech War.” Orbis (spring 1994): 177–191.CrossRef
Cigar, Norman. “Croatia’s War of Independence: The Parameters of War Termination.” The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2 (1997): 34–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimbala, Stephen J., ed. Strategic War Termination. New York: Praeger, 1986.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. Limited Nuclear War: Political Theory and Conventions. Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Clarke, Bruce B. G. “Conflict Termination: A Rational Model.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, Vol. 16, No. 1 (1993): 25–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Bruce C., Gates, Thomas, and Douglas, James H.. “Limited War: Where Do They Stand?” The Army, Navy, Air Force Register and Defense Times (May 23, 1959): 24–25.
Clarke, Michael. “The Ending of Wars and the Ending of Eras.” The RUSI Journal, Vol. 160, No. 4 (2015): 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausewitz, Carl von. Carl von Clausewitz: Two Letters on Strategy. Paret, Peter and Moran, Dan, trans. and eds. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute, US Army Command and General Staff College, 1984.Google Scholar
Clausewitz, Carl vonOn War.Howard, Michael and Paret, Peter, trans. and eds. Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Clausewitz, Carl vonStrategie. Marc Guarin, trans., Stoker, Donald and Bassford, Christopher, eds. Fort Bragg, NC: Clausewitz.com, 2019.Google Scholar
Clayton, Anthony. The Wars of French Decolonization. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Clodfelter, Mark. “Air Power and Limited War: An Analysis of the Air Campaigns against North Vietnam as Instruments of National Policy.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1987.Google Scholar
Clodfelter, Mark. The Limits of Air Power: The American Bombing of North Vietnam. New York: Free Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Clodfelter, Mark. “Nixon and the Air Weapon.” In Showalter, Dennis E. and Albert, John G., eds. An American Dilemma: Vietnam, 1964–1973. Chicago: Imprint Publications, 1993, 167–186.Google Scholar
Cordesmann, Anthony H. and Wang, Michael. Chinese Military Strategy and Military Modernization in 2015: A Comparative Analysis. Washington, DC: CSIS, 2015.Google Scholar
Corum, James S. “Building the Malayan Army and Police – Britain’s Experience during the Malayan Emergency, 1948–1960.” In Gott, Kendall D., ed. Security Assistance: US and International Historical Perspectives.Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. “The Termination of Conflict.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 5, No. 4 (December 1961): 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Conrad C. “Exerting Air Pressure and Globalizing Containment: War Termination in Korea.” In Moten, ed. Between War and Peace, 237–258.
Crane, Conrad C. “From Korea to Kosovo: Matching Expectation with Reality for Modern Airpower in Limited Wars.” In Morton, Jeffrey S., Nation, R. Craig, Forage, Paul, and Bianchi, Stefano, eds. Reflections on the Balkan Wars: Ten Years after the Break-up of Yugoslavia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Conrad C. “To Avert Impending Disaster: American Military Plans to Use Atomic Weapons during the Korean War.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 23, No.2 (2000): 72–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Audrey Kurth. “The ‘War on Terrorism’: What Does It Mean to Win?” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2 (2014): 174–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, Brian. A Theory of Conflict. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1974.Google Scholar
Daalder, Ivo H. and O’Hanlan, Michael E.. Winning Ugly: NATO’s War to Save Kosovo. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Danchev, Alex and Keohane, Dan, eds. International Perspectives on the Gulf Conflict, 1990–91.Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar
Darling, Roger. “A New Conceptual Scheme for Analyzing Counterinsurgency.” Military Review, Vol. 54, No. 6 (June 1974): 54–66.Google Scholar
Darling, Roger. “A New Conceptual Scheme for Analyzing Insurgency.”Military Review, Vol. 54, No. 2 (February 1974): 27–38.Google Scholar
Daugherty, William, Levi, Barbara, and Frank, von Hippel. “The Consequences of ‘Limited’ Nuclear Attack on the United States.” International Security, Vol. 10, No. 4 (spring 1986): 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Charles-Philippe and Roche, Jean-Jacques. Théories de la sécurité: Définitions, approches et concepts de la sécurité internationale. Paris: Montchrestien, 2002.Google Scholar
DeWeerd, H. A. “The Triumph of the Limiters: Korea.” Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1968.
Dickey, Jeffrey V., Everett, Thomas B., Galvach, Zane M., Mesko, Matthew J., and Soltis, Anton V.. “Russian Political Warfare: Origin, Evolution, and Application.” MA thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, 2015.
Diehl, Paul F., ed. War. 6 vols. London: Sage Publications, 2005.Google Scholar
Dolman, Everett Carl. Pure Strategy: Power and Principle in the Space and Information Age.Abingdon, UK: Frank Cass, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donner, Michael. Die neutrale Handelsschiffahrt im begrenzten militärischen Konflikt: Eine völkerrechtliche Untersuchung am Beispiel des Konfliktes zwischen Irak und Iran (1980–1988).Kehl am Rhein, Germany: N. P. Engel Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
Doughart, Jackson. “Neoconservatism in the Political Thought of Albert Camus: A Preliminary Inquiry.” The Journal of Camus Studies (2012): 41–52.
Dougherty, Kevin. The United States Military in Limited War: Case Studies in Success and Failure. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2012.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. W., Jr. and Greene, T. E., “The Contextual Study: A Structured Approach to the Study of Political and Military Aspects of Limited War.” Operations Research, Vol. 8, No. 5 (September–October 1960): 639–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elowitz, Larry. “Korea and Vietnam: Limited War and the American Political System.” Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Florida, 1972.
Evans, Martin. Algeria: France’s Undeclared War. Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Finletter, Thomas K.Power and Policy: US Foreign and Military Policy in the Hydrogen Age. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1954.Google Scholar
Fisher, Thomas L. “Limited War – What Is It?” Air University Quarterly Review, Vol. 9 (winter 1957–58): 127–142.Google Scholar
Flavin, William. “Planning for Conflict Termination and Post-Conflict Success.” Parameters (autumn 2003): 95–112.
Fleck, Janice. Limited War Theory in Vietnam: A Critique according to Clausewitz.Washington, DC: National Defense University, National War College, 1994.Google Scholar
Flynn, Michael T. “How about Winning Our Nation’s Wars instead of Just Participating in Them?” Military Review (March–April 2016): 8–15.
Foot, Rosemary. A Substitute for Victory: The Politics of Peacemaking at the Korean Armistice Talks. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Forsén, Björn and Annette, Forsén. “German Secret Submarine Exports, 1919–35.” In Stoker, Donald J.Jr. and Grant, Jonathan A., eds. Girding for Battle: The Arms Trade in a Global Perspective. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003, 113–134.Google Scholar
Förster, Stig and Nagler, Jörg. “Introduction.” In Förster and Nagler, eds., On the Road to Total War, 1–25.CrossRef
Förster, Stig and Nagler, JörgOn the Road to Total War: The American Civil War and the German Wars of Unification, 1861–1871. German Historical Institute. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Fortna, Virginia Page. “Scraps of Paper? Agreements and the Durability of Peace.”International Organization, No. 57 (spring 2003): 337–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, James L. and Brewer, Garry D.. “And the Clocks Were Striking Thirteen: The Termination of War.” Policy Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 2 (June 1976): 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, William T.R. “The Causes of Peace and Conditions of War.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 392 (November 1970): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, William T.R. “Foreword.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 392 (November 1970): viii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Richard. “Ending the Pacific War: ‘No Alternative to Annihilation.’” In Marston, Daniel, ed. The Pacific War Companion. Oxford, UK: Osprey Publishing, 2005, 227–245.Google Scholar
Franklin, William D. “Clausewitz on Limited War.” Military Review, Vol. 47, No. 6 (1967): 23–29.Google Scholar
Fravel, M. Taylor. “China’s Changing Approach to Military Strategy: The Science of Military Strategy from 2001 to 2013.” In McReynolds, Joe, ed. China’s Evolving Military Strategy. Washington, DC: Brookings, 2016, 40–73.Google Scholar
Garg, Rahul. “Positive Prospects for Limited War in South Asia.” Journal of Defence Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2 (April 2011): 90–108.Google Scholar
Garnett, John C. “Limited ‘Conventional’ War in the Nuclear Age.” In Howard, Michael, ed. Restraints on War: Studies in the Limitation of Armed Conflict. Oxford University Press, 1979, 79–102.Google Scholar
Garnett, John C. “Limited War.” In Baylis, John, Booth, Ken, Garnett, John, and Williams, Phil. Contemporary Strategy: Theories and Policies. New York: Holmes & Meier, 1982, 114–131.Google Scholar
Garnter, Scott Sigmund. Strategic Assessment in War. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Gat, Azar. A History of Military Thought: From the Enlightenment to the Cold War. Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Gates, Robert M.Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War. New York: Knopf, 2014.Google Scholar
Gavin, James M. “Why Limited War?” Ordnance, Vol. 42 (April 1958): 809–813.Google Scholar
Gelpi, Christopher, Feaver, Peter D., and Reifler, Jason. “Success Matters: Casualty Sensitivity and the War in Iraq.” International Security, Vol. 30, No. 3 (winter 2005–06): 7–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, Paul H. B. “Chinese Military Strategy Revised: Local and Limited War.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 519 (January 1992): 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, H. E.War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Andrew. “Social Protest in Imperial Japan: The Hibiya Riot of 1905,” The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol. 12, No. 3 (July 20, 2014): 1–22.Google Scholar
Gray, Colin S.Categorical Confusion? The Strategic Implications of Recognizing Challenges Either as Irregular or Traditional. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Colin S.Defining and Achieving Decisive Victory. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Colin S. and Payne, Keith. “Victory is Possible.”Foreign Policy, No. 39 (summer 1980): 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greathouse, Ronald. H. “Profile of a Dilemma: Limited Nuclear War.” The Marine Corps Gazette, Vol. 43 (January 1959): 24–26.Google Scholar
Greentree, Todd R. “A War Examined: Afghanistan.” Parameters, Vol. 43, No. 3 (2013): 87–97.Google Scholar
Haun, Phil and Colin, Jackson. “Breaker of Armies: Air Power in the Easter Offensive and the Myth of Linebacker I and II in the Vietnam War.”International Security, Vol. 40, No. 3 (winter 2015–16): 139–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, William R. “Imposing Peace: Total vs. Limited Wars, and the Need to Put Boots on the Ground.” Parameters (summer 2000): 72–82.
Hawkins, William R. “The Man Who Invented Limited War.” MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History, Vol. 4, No. 1 (autumn 1991): 105–109.Google Scholar
Hayden, Bill. “Opening Address.” In Young, ed. Defence and the Media in the Time of Limited War, 5–14.
Hayes, John D. “Peripheral Strategy … Littoral Tactics … Limited War.” The Army Combat Forces Journal, Vol. 5 (September 1954): 36–39.Google Scholar
Hess, Gary R.Presidential Decisions for War: Korea, Vietnam, and the Persian Gulf. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Heuser, Beatrice. The Evolution of Strategy: Thinking about War from Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuser, Beatrice. “Regina Maris and the Command of the Sea: The Sixteenth-Century Origins of Modern Maritime Strategy.” Journal of Strategic Studies (2015): 1–38.CrossRef
Higgins, Trumbull. Korea and the Fall of MacArthur: A Précis in Limited War. New York: Oxford University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Highland, , Curteis, H. M.. “The Doctrine of Limited Liability.” Royal United Services Institution, Vol. 83, No. 532 (1938): 695–701.Google Scholar
Hildreth, Charles H.USAF Logistics Preparations for Limited War, 1958–1961. Washington, DC:USAF Historical Division Liaison Office, October 1962.Google Scholar
Hilsman, Roger. From Nuclear Military Strategy to a World Without War: A History and a Proposal. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1999.Google Scholar
Hirano, Ryuji. “The First Sino–Japanese and the Russo–Japanese War from the Viewpoint of a ‘Maritime Limited War’: From the Perspective of Julian Corbett’s Strategic Theory.” Briefing Memorandum. National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS) News. Japan Ministry of Defense (June 12, 2015).
Hoag, Malcolm W.On Local War Doctrine. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1961.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Frank G.Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Arlington, VA: Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, 2007.Google Scholar
Holmqvist, Caroline. Policing Wars: On Military Intervention in the Twenty-First Century. Houndsmill, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J.The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homan, C. “Nucleaire Strategie.” In Teitler, Bosch, and Klinkert, eds. Militaire Strategie, 231–260.
Honig, Jan Willem. “Problems of Text and Translation.” In Strachan, Hew and Herberg-Rothe, Andreas, eds. Clausewitz in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press, 2007, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horne, Alistair. A Savage War of Peace: Algeria, 1954–1962. New York:New York Review of Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Horne, John. “Introduction: Mobilizing for ‘Total War,’ 1914–1918.” In Horne, John, ed. State, Society, and Mobilization in Europe during the First World War. Cambridge University Press, 1997, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Michael. “The Classical Strategists.” The Adelphi Papers, Vol. 9, No. 54 (1969): 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Michael. “Constraints on War.” In Howard, Michael, Andreopolous, George J., and Shulman, Mark R., eds. The Laws of War: Constraints on Warfare in the Western World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994, 1–11.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael, Andreopolous, George J., and Shulman, Mark R. “The Forgotten Dimension of Strategy.” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 57, No. 5 (1979): 975–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Michael, Andreopolous, George J., and Shulman, Mark R. ed. Restraints on War: Studies in the Limitation of Armed Conflict. Oxford University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael, Andreopolous, George J., and Shulman, Mark R. “Temperamenta Belli: Can War be Controlled?” In Howard, ed. Restraints on War, 1–16.
Howard, Michael, Andreopolous, George J., and Shulman, Mark R. “The Transformation of Strategy.” The RUSI Journal, Vol. 156, No. 4 (2011): 12–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, Wayne Wei-Siang. “Total War and the American Civil War Reconsidered: The End of an Outdated ‘Master Narrative.’”The Journal of the Civil War Era, Vol. 1, No. 3 (September 2011): 394–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, Haroro J. and Whiteside, Craig. “Outshouting the Flea: Islamic State and Modern Asymmetric Strategic Communications.” In Dew, Andrea, Genest, Marc, and Payne, S. C. M., eds. From Quills to Tweets: How America Communicates War and Revolution. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Interavia Study Group. “‘Little Wars’ Need Big Battalions.” Interavia, Vol. 11, No. 10 (October 1956): 773–776.
Ivey, Ramon A.“Limited War, National Will, and the All Volunteer Army.” Study Project. Carlisle Barracks, PA:US Army War College, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, Tan Kwoh. “The Korean War June–October 1950: Inchon and Stalin in the ‘Trigger vs. Justification’ Debate.” Working Paper No. 105. Singapore Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (January 2006).
Jackson, Colin F. “Lost Chance or Lost Horizon? Strategic Opportunity and Escalation Risk in the Korean War, April–July 1951.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 33, No. 2 (2010): 255–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, , Clayton, D., with Sharp Wells, Anne. Refighting the Last War: Command and Crisis in Korea. New York: Free Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Janda, Lance. “Shutting the Gates of Mercy: The American Origins of Total War, 1860–1880.” Journal of Military History, Vol. 59, No. 1 (January 1995): 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janecek, Frank P.“In Limited War – Victory before the Culminating Point.”Joint Maritime Operations paper. Newport, RI: US Naval War College, May 1995.Google Scholar
Jarausch, Konrad H.“The Illusion of Limited War: Chancellor Bethmann Hollweg’s Calculated Risk, July 1914.”Central European History, Vol. 2, No. 1 (March 1969): 48–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jian, Chen. China’s Road to the Korean War: The Making of the Sino-American Confrontation. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Jordan, Jenna. “Attacking the Leader, Missing the Mark: Why Terrorist Groups Survive Decapitation Strikes.” International Security, Vol. 38, No. 4 (spring 2014): 7–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josephson, Matthew. “The Fantasy of Limited War.” The Nation (August 31, 1957): 89–91.
Joshi, Shashank, “India’s Military Instrument: A Doctrine Stillborn.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4 (2013): 512–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy, C. Turner. How Communists Negotiate. New York: Macmillan, 2013 .Google Scholar
Kagan, Donald, Cohen, Eliot, Doran, Charles F., and Mandelbaum, Michael. “Is Major War Obsolete? An Exchange.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, Vol. 41, No. 2 (1999): 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Herman. “Issues of Thermonuclear War Termination.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 392 (November 1970): 133–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Eugenia C.“‘Total War, Total Nonsense’ or ‘The Military Historian’s Fetish.’” In Neiberg, Michael S., ed. Arms and the Man: Military History Essays in Honor of Dennis Showalter. Leiden:Brill, 2011, 223–227.Google Scholar
Kilgour, D. Marc and Zagare, Frank C.. “Explaining Limited Conflicts.” Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 24, No. 1 (2007): 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Arm-San. “A Note on Sunzi’s Art of War and Limited War: A Modern Interpretation.” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Vol.6, No. 1 (1994): 245–257.Google Scholar
Kim, Taewoo. “Limited War, Unlimited Targets: US Air Force Bombing of North Korea during the Korean War, 1950–1953.” Critical Asian Studies, Vol. 44, No. 3 (2012): 467–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriner, Douglas and Shen, Francis. “Limited War and American Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics, Vol. 71, No. 4 (October 2009): 1514–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krizanovic, Gary. Operational Art in Limited War Termination: The Bridge between the Strategic and the Operational Levels of War. Joint Maritime Operations paper. Newport, RI: US Naval War College, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklick, Bruce. Blind Oracles: Intellectuals and War from Kennan to Kissinger. Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Ladwig, Walter C., III. “A Cold Start for Hot Wars? The Indian Army’s New Limited War Doctrine.” International Security, Vol. 32, No. 3 (winter 2007–08): 158–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, , Yu-jen, Nathan. “United States Policy and the Diplomacy of Limited War in Korea, 1950–1951.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, 1974.
Nicholas, Lambert. Review essay, “False Prophet?: The Maritime Theory of Julian Corbett and Professional Military Education.” The Journal of Military History, Vol. 77, No. 3 (July 2013): 1055–1078.Google Scholar
Layton, Peter. “The Idea of Grand Strategy.” The RUSI Journal, Vol. 157, No. 4 (2012): 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBow, Richard Ned. “Thomas Schelling and Strategic Bargaining.” International Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3 (summer 1996): 555–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBow, Richard “Reason Divorced from Reality: Thomas Schelling and Strategic Bargaining.” International Politics, Vol. 43 (2006): 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Cheminant, P. de L. “Tactical Deterrence or Limited War?” Brassey’s Annual (1961): 112–121.
Lee, Bradford A.“Strategic Interaction: Theory and History for Practitioners.” In Mahnken, Thomas, ed. Competitive Strategies for the 21st Century. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012, 28–46.Google Scholar
Lee, Bradford A. “Winning the War but Losing the Peace? The United States and the Strategic Issues of War Termination.” In Lee, Bradford A. and Walling, Karl F. eds. Strategic Logic and Political Rationality: Essays in Honor of Michael I. Handel. London: Frank Cass, 2003, 248–273.Google Scholar
Lee, Steven. “Morality, the SDI, and Limited Nuclear War.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 17, No. 1 (winter 1988): 15–43.Google Scholar
Lee, Wayne E. “Plattsburgh 1814: Warring for Bargaining Chips.” In Moten, ed. Between War and Peace, 43–63.
LeGro, William E. “The Why and How of Limited War.” Military Review, Vol. 50, No. 7 (July 1970): 32–39.Google Scholar
Lemmer, George F. “USAF Manpower in Limited War, 1964–1967.” USAF Historical Division Liaison Office, 1968.
Lepgold, Joseph and Sterling, Brent L.. “When Do States Fight Limited Wars? Political Risk, Policy Risk, and Policy Choice.” Security Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4 (2000): 127–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesh, Bruce A. “Limited War or Rollback of Communism?: Truman, MacArthur, and the Korean Conflict.”OAH Magazine of History, Vol. 22, No. 4 (October 2008): 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Irving W. “A New Paradigm for an Old Conflict: The Mexico–United States War.” The Journal of Military History, Vol. 73, No. 2 (April 2009): 393–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, Jonathan Samuel. The Soviet View of US Strategic Doctrine: Implications for Decision Making. Foreword by Gouré, Leon. New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1983.Google Scholar
Lockyer, Adam. “How Democracies Exit Small Wars: The Role of Opposition Parties in War Termination.” The Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 66, No. 3 (2012): 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofgren, Charles A. “How New Is Limited War?” Military Review (July 1967): 16–23.
Long, Austin. On “Other War”: Lessons from Five Decades of RAND Counterinsurgency Research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2006.Google Scholar
Lucas, George R. “Postmodern War.” Journal of Military Ethics, Vol. 9, No. 4 (2010): 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, Edward C. and Albert, Stuart. “Introduction.” In Albert, Stuart and Luck, Edward C., eds. On the Endings of Wars. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press, 1980, 3–6.Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N.On the Meaning of Victory: Essays on Strategy. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986.Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N.Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard, 1987.Google Scholar
Lyall, Jason. “Do Democracies Make Inferior Counterinsurgents? Reassessing Democracy’s Impact on War Outcomes and Duration.” International Organization, Vol. 64, No. 1 (2010): 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lybrand, William A., ed. Proceedings of the Symposium: The US Army’s Limited-War Mission and Social Science Research, March 26, 27, 28, 1962.Washington, DC:Special Operations Research Office, American University, 1962.Google Scholar
Lynn, John A. “Patterns of Insurgency and Counterinsurgency.” Military Review (July–August 2005): 22–27.
Tse-Tung, Mao. On Guerrilla Warfare. Samuel B. Griffith II, trans. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Tse-Tung, Mao “The Three Stages of Protracted War.” In Selected Military Writings. Peking: Foreign Language Press, 1967, 210–219.Google Scholar
Marighella, Carlos. “The Minimanual of the Urban Guerrilla.” In Sarkesian, Sam. C., ed. Revolutionary Guerrilla Warfare. Chicago: Precedent Publishing, 1975, 507–530.Google Scholar
Marolda, Edward J. “The Influence of Burke’s Boys on Limited War.” US Naval Institute Proceedings, Vol. 107, No. 942 (August 1981): 36–41.Google Scholar
Marquis, Jefferson P. “The ‘Other War’: An Intellectual History of American Nation-Building in South Vietnam, 1954–1975.” Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University, 1997.
Martel, William C.Victory in War: Foundations of Modern Military Policy. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Martin, Lawrence. “Limited Nuclear War.” In Howard, ed. Restraints on War, 103–122.
Martin, , Richard, Wayne. “An Analysis of United States International Relations before and during Limited War.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California, 1970.
Matray, James I. “Truman’s Plan for Victory: National Self-Determination and the Thirty-Eighth Parallel Decision in Korea.” The Journal of American History, Vol. 66, No. 2 (September 1979): 314–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Neville. China’s “Aggression” of 1962 and the Unresolved Border Dispute. Oxford: Court Place Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Mazarr, Michael J. “The Folly of ‘Asymmetric’ War.” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 3 (July 2008): 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazarr, Michael J.Mastering the Gray Zone: Understanding a Changing Era of Conflict. Carlisle, PA: US Army War College Press, 2015.Google Scholar
McCallion, JosephJr. “Achieving Total War Goals with a Limited War Force: Convincing the Enemy to Accept Defeat.” MA thesis, School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army Command and General Staff College, 2005.CrossRef
McClintock, Robert. The Meaning of Limited War. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1967.Google Scholar
McCuen, John J.The Art of Counter-Revolutionary Warfare: A Psycho-Politico-Military Strategy of Counter-insurgency. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole, 1966.Google Scholar
Milevski, Lukas. The Evolution of Modern Grand Strategic Thought. Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milevski, Lukas. “The Modern Evolution of Grand Strategic Thought.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading, 2014.
Milevski, Lukas.“The Nature of Strategy versus the Character of War.” Comparative Strategy, Vol. 35, No. 5 (2016): 438–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milevski, Lukas. “Prospective Strategy for Baltic Defense: The Russian Public and War Termination in the Baltic States.” Military Review (January–February 2018): 58–70.
Milevski, Lukas.“Revisiting Wiley’s Dichotomy of Strategy: The Effects of Sequential and Cumulative Patterns of Operations.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 35, No. 2 (2012): 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milevski, Lukas.The West’s East: Contemporary Baltic Defense in Strategic Perspective. Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Miller, Paul D.Armed State Building: Confronting State Failure, 1898–2012. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, Alan R.The Korean War: The Essential Bibliography Series. Washington, DC: Potomac Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Millett, Alan R.The War for Korea, 1945–1950: A House Burning. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2005.Google Scholar
Millett, Alan R.The War for Korea, 1950–1951: They Came from the North. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2010.Google Scholar
Millett, Allan R. and Maslowski, Peter. For the Common Defense: A Military History of the United States of America. 2nd edn. New York: Free Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Millstein, (Mil’shtein), M. and Slobodenko, A.. “‘Limited War’ – Weapon of Unlimited Aggression.” New Times (October 1958): 13–15.
Milne, David.“‘Our Equivalent of Guerrilla Warfare’: Walt Rostow and the Bombing of Vietnam, 1961–1968.” The Journal of Military History, Vol. 71, No. 1 (January 2007): 169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mlyn, Eric. The State, Society, and Limited Nuclear War. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Mochalov, V. “Concerning the ‘Theory of Limited Wars.’” Soviet Military Review, No. 2 (February 1965): 40–42.Google Scholar
Mochalov, V.“What Lies behind the Theory of ‘Limited Wars’?”Soviet Military Review, No. 8 (August 1969): 54–56.Google Scholar
Mochalov, V. and Dashichev, V., “The Smoke Screen of the American Imperialists.” Red Star (December 17, 1957). Leon Gouré, trans. Published as Soviet Commentary on the Doctrine of Limited Nuclear War. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1958.
Nitze, Paul. H., with Smith, Ann M. and Rearden, Steven L.. From Hiroshima to Glasnost: At the Center of Decision – A Memoir. New York: Grove Weidenfeld, 1989.Google Scholar
Nitze, Paul. H., with Smith, Ann M. and Rearden, Steven L. “Limited Wars or Massive Retaliation?” Review of Henry A. Kissinger, Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. The Reporter (September 5, 1957): 40–41.
Nowlin, David V. and Stupak, Ronald J.. War as an Instrument of Policy: Past, Present, and Future. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1998.Google Scholar
“NSC 68: A Report to the National Security Council, 14 April 1950.”Naval War College Review, Vol. 27, No. 6 (May–June 1975): 51–108.
Oberst, David J.Why Wars End: An Expected Utility War Termination Model.Carlisle Barracks, PA: US Army War College, 1992.Google Scholar
O’Brien, William. The Conduct of Just and Limited War. New York: Praeger, 1981.Google Scholar
O’Brien, William “Guidelines for Limited War.” Military Review, Vol. 59, No.2 (February 1979): 64–72.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. “Just War, Limited War, and Vietnam.” Journal of Social Philosophy, Vol. 1, No. 4 (January 1973): 16–18.Google Scholar
O’Connell, D.P. “Limited War at Sea since 1945.” In Howard, ed. Restraints on War, 123–134.
O’Connor, Raymond G. “Victory in Modern War.” Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 6, No. 4 (1969): 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, William. “The Concept of Small Wars.” Small Wars & Insurgencies, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1990): 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, Robert E. “Limited War and Korea.” In Freedman, Lawrence, ed. War. Oxford University Press, 1994, 336–341.Google Scholar
Osgood, Robert E.Limited War Revisited. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Osgood, Robert E. “Limited War Strategy.” Army, Vol. 9 (December 1958): 53–54.Google Scholar
Osgood, Robert E.Limited War: The Challenge to American Strategy. Chicago University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Osgood, Robert E. “Nuclear Arms: Uses and Limits.” The New Republic (September 10, 1962): 15–18.
Osgood, Robert E. “The Post-War Strategy of Limited War: Before, during and after Vietnam.” In Martin, Laurence, ed. Strategic Thought in the Nuclear Age. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979, 93–130.Google Scholar
Martin, Laurence “The Reappraisal of Limited War.” The Adelphi Papers, Vol. 9, No. 54 (1969): 41–54.Google Scholar
Martin, Laurence “The Reappraisal of Limited War.” In Problems of Modern Strategy. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1970, 92–120.Google Scholar
Martin, Laurence “The Reappraisal of Limited War.” In Freedman, Lawrence, ed. War. Oxford University Press, 1994, 348–351.Google Scholar
Palit, D. K.War in the Deterrent Age. London: Macdonald, 1966.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert. Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Paret, Peter. “A Total Weapon of Limited War.” Royal United Services Institute, Vol. 105, No. 617 (1960): 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paret, Peter. “Eine totale Waffe in begrenzten Krieg.” Wehrwissenschaftliche Rundschau: Zeitschrift für die europäische Sicherheit, Vol. 9, No. 10 (1959): 555–564.Google Scholar
Paret, Peter. French Revolutionary Warfare from Indochina to Algeria. London: Pall Mall Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Paret, Peter. ed. Makers of Modern Strategy: From Machiavelli to the Nuclear Age. Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Paret, Peter. Understanding War: Essays on Clausewitz and the History of Military Power. Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Park, Tae-Gyun, “US Policy Change toward South Korea in the 1940s and the 1950s.” Journal of International and Area Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2 (2000): 89–104.Google Scholar
Paschall, Rod. “Low-Intensity Conflict Doctrine: Who Needs It?” Parameters, Vol. 15, No. 3 (fall 1985): 33–45.Google Scholar
Pate, Randolph McC. “How Can We Cope with Limited War?” The Army, Navy, Air Force Register and Defense Times, Vol. 80 (November 28, 1959): 16–17.Google Scholar
“Peace or Piecemeal? The Army’s Role in Limited War.” Army Information Digest, Vol. 13 (June 1958): 2–3.
Pike, Douglas. Viet Cong: The Organization and Techniques of the National Liberation Front of South Vietnam. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Pillar, Paul R.Negotiating Peace: War Termination as a Bargaining Process. Princeton University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimentel, David and Burgess, Michael. “Nuclear War Investigation Related to a Limited Nuclear Battle with Emphasis on Agricultural Impacts in the United States.” Ambio, Vol. 41, No.8 (December 2012): 894–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohl, James W.Exhibition review of Korea: America’s First Limited War. Exhibition at the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum, Austin, Texas, May 12, 1988 – January 8, 1989. The Southwest Historical Quarterly, Vol. 92, No. 2 (October 1988): 389–392.Google Scholar
Quester, George H. “Wars Prolonged by Misunderstood Signals.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 392 (November 1970): 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghavan, V. R. “Limited War and Nuclear Escalation in South Asia.” The Nonproliferation Review, Vol. 8, No. 3 (2001): 82–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsey, Kristopher W. “Settling It on the Field: Battlefield Events and War Termination.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 52, No. 6 (December 2008): 850–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randle, Robert. “Peace in Vietnam and Laos: 1954, 1962, 1973.” In Smith, David and Randle, Robert, eds. From War to Peace: Essays in Peacemaking and War Termination. New York: Trustees of Columbia University, 1974, 42–67.Google Scholar
Ranft, Brian. “Restraints on War at Sea before 1945.” In Howard, ed. Restraints on War, 39–56.
Rauchensteiner, Manfried and Schmidl, Erwin A., eds. Formen des Krieges: Vom Mittelalter zum “Low Intensity Conflict.”Graz: Verlag Styria, 1991.Google Scholar
Read, Thornton. “Limited Strategic War and Tactical Nuclear War.” In Knorr and Read, eds. Limited Strategic War, 67–116.
Rhodes, Quinn J. “Limited War under the Nuclear Umbrella: An Analysis of India’s Cold Start Doctrine and Its Implications for Stability on the Subcontinent.” MA thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, 2010.
Richardson, James L.Review of Klaus Knorr and Thornton Read, eds., Limited Strategic War. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 7, No. 4 (December 1963): 781–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Robert C., III. “Do We Need Unlimited Forces for Limited War?” Air Force, Vol. 42 (March 1959): 53–56.Google Scholar
Richelson, Jeffrey T. “Soviet Strategic Doctrine and Limited Nuclear Operations: A Metagame Analysis.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 23, No. 2 (June 1979): 326–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rid, Thomas. “Cyber War Will Not Take Place.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1 (2012): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgway, Matthew B.The Korean War. New York: Da Capo, 1967.Google Scholar
Ridgway, Matthew B.The War in Korea: How We Met the Challenge, How All-Out Asian War Was Averted, Why MacArthur Was Dismissed, Why Today’s War Objectives Must Be Limited. London: Barrie and Rockliff, 1967.Google Scholar
Ritter, Gerhard. Frederick the Great: A Historical Profile. Paret, Peter, ed. and trans. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Rose, Gideon. How Wars End: Why We Always Fight the Last Battle. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2010.Google Scholar
Rosen, , Peter, Stephen. Vietnam and the American Theory of Limited War. Harvard Center for International Affairs. Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense, December 1981.Google Scholar
Rosen, Stephen “Vietnam and the American Theory of Limited War.” International Security, Vol. 7, No. 2 (fall 1982): 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, William. “The Kennedy Administration, US Foreign Internal Security Assistance, and the Challenge of ‘Subterranean War,’ 1961–63.” Small Wars & Insurgencies, Vol. 14, No. 3 (2003): 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosencrance, R. N. “Can We Limit Nuclear War?” Military Review, Vol. 38 (March 1959): 51–59.Google Scholar
Ross, Andrew L. “The Origins of Limited Nuclear War Theory.” In Larsen, and Kartchner, , eds. On Limited Nuclear War in the 21st Century, 21–48.
Rostow, W. W.The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Rovner, Joshua. “Delusion of Defeat: The United States and Iraq, 1990–1998.” Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2014): 482–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Donald.“What’s in a Name? Clausewitz’s Search to Define ‘Strategy.’” Infinity Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2 (spring 2016): 11–15.Google Scholar
Stoker, Donald.“What’s in a Name II: ‘Total War’ and Other Terms that Mean Nothing.”Infinity Journal, Vol. 5, No. 3 (fall 2016): 21–23.Google Scholar
Stoker, Donald and Westermann, Edward B., eds. Expeditionary Police Advising and Militarization: Building Security in a Fractured World. Solihull, UK: Helion & Co., 2018.Google Scholar
Stoker, Donald and Jones, Michael W.. “Colonial Military Strategy.” In Stoker, Donald, Hagan, Kenneth J., and McMaster, Michael T., eds. Strategy in the War of American Independence: A Global Approach. London: Routledge, 2010, 5–34.Google Scholar
Tarapore, Arzan. Holocaust or Hollow Victory: Limited War in Nuclear South Asia. New Delhi: Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, 2005.Google Scholar
Taylor, Maxwell D. “Improving Our Capabilities for Limited War.” Army Information Digest, Vol. 14 (February 1959): 2–9.Google Scholar
Taylor, Maxwell D. “On Limited War.” Army Information Digest, Vol. 13 (June 1958): 4–5.Google Scholar
Taylor, Maxwell D.The Uncertain Trumpet. New York: Harper, 1960.Google Scholar
Teitler, G. “Oorlogvoering: Eenvormigheid en Verscheidenheid.” In Teitler, Bosch, and Klinkert, eds. Militaire Stratégie, 77–106.
Teitler, G., Bosch, J. M. J., and Klinkert, W., eds. Militaire Stratégie. Amsterdam: Mets & Schilt, 2002.Google Scholar
Teller, Edward. “The Way the US Army Would Fight in Little Wars.” US News & World Report (November 9, 1956): 56–59.
Tellis, Ashley J., Christine Fair, C., Medby, Jamison Jo. Limited Conflicts under the Nuclear Umbrella: Indian and Pakistani Lessons from the Kargil Crisis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2002.Google Scholar
Terhune, Kenneth W. and Firestone, Joseph M.. “Global War, Limited War, and Peace: Hypotheses from Three Experimental Worlds.” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 2 (June 1970): 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrill, , Andrew, W.. Escalation and Intrawar Deterrence during Limited Wars in the Middle East. Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 2009.Google Scholar
Tinch, Clark W. “Quasi-War between Japan and the USSR, 1937–1939.” World Politics, Vol. 2, No. 2 (January 1951): 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc, ed. The Development of American Strategic Thought. Vol. I.Basic Documents from the Eisenhower and Kennedy Periods, including the Basic National Security Policy Papers from 1953 to 1959. New York: Garland, 1987.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, MarcThe Development of American Strategic Thought. Vol. II. Writings on Strategy, 1945–1951. New York: Garland, 1987.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, MarcThe Development of American Strategic Thought. Vol. III (in three volumes). Writings on Strategy, 1952–1960. New York: Garland, 1987.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, MarcThe Development of American Strategic Thought. Vol. IV. Writings on Strategy, 1961–1969, and Retrospectives.New York: Garland, 1987.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, MarcHistory and Strategy. Princeton University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc “Strategic Thought in America, 1952–1966.” Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 104, No. 2 (summer 1989): 301–344.CrossRef