Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-pf4mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-29T05:03:40.611Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2019

Justin Garson
Justin Garson
Affiliation:
Hunter College, City University of New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
What Biological Functions Are and Why They Matter , pp. 216 - 232
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

References

Abrams, M. 2005. Teleosemantics without natural selection. Biology and Philosophy 20: 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, F. R. 1979. A goal-state theory of function attributions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9: 492–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberts, B., et al. 2012. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 5th ed. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Allen, C., and Bekoff, M. 1995. Biological function, adaptation, and natural design. Philosophy of Science 62: 609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Amundson, R. 2000. Against normal function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31:33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amundson, R., and Lauder, G. V. 1994. Function without purpose: The uses of causal role function in evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy 9: 443–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonini, A., and Stryker, M. P. 1993. Development of individual geniculocortical arbors in cat striate cortex and effects of binocular impulse blockade. Journal of Neuroscience 13: 3549–3573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayala, F. J. 1970. Teleological explanations in evolutionary biology. Philosophy of Science 37: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, H. B. 1988. Neuroscience: A new era? Nature 331: 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, E. 2016. The Minority Body: A Theory of Disability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, B. 2008. Natural selection as a mechanism. Philosophy of Science 75:306–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, G., et al. 1956. Toward a theory of schizophrenia. Behavioral Science 1: 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. 2005. Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 412–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R. C. 1993. Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bedau, M. 1991. Can biological teleology be naturalized? Journal of Philosophy 88: 647–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedau, M. 1992. Where’s the good in teleology? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 781–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigelow, J. and Pargetter, R. 1987. Functions. Journal of Philosophy 84: 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, W. J. and von Wahlert, G. 1965. Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19: 269–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, C. 1975. On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy and Public Affairs 5: 49–68.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. 1976. Wright on functions. Philosophical Review 85: 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, C. 1977. Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science 44: 542–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, C. 2002. A rebuttal on functions. In Ariew, A., Cummins, R., and Perlman, M., eds., Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 63–112.Google Scholar
Boorse, C. 2014. A second rebuttal on health. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39: 683–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, F. 2008. Causal processes, fitness, and the differential persistence of lineages. Philosophy of Science 75: 560–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, F. 2013. How ecosystem evolution strengthens the case for function pluralism. In Huneman, P., ed., Function: Selection and Mechanisms. Dordrecht: Springer, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovet, P. and Parnas, J. 1993. Schizophrenic delusions: A phenomenological approach. Schizophrenia Bulletin 19: 579–597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandon, R. N. 1990. Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brandon, R. N. 2013. A general case for functional pluralism. In Huneman, P., ed., Function: Selection and Mechanisms. Dordrecht: Springer, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromberger, S. 1966. Why-questions. In Colodny, R., ed., Mind and Cosmos. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press., 86–111.Google Scholar
Brown, M. C., Jansen, J. K. S., and Van Essen, D. 1976. Polyneural innervation of skeletal muscle in new-born rats and its elimination during maturation. Journal of Physiology 261: 387–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brüne, M. 2008. Textbook of Evolutionary Psychiatry: The Origins of Psychopathy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buller, D. J. 1997. Individualism and evolutionary psychology (or, in defense of “narrow” functions). Philosophy of Science 64: 74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buller, D. J. 1998. Etiological theories of function: A geographical survey. Biology and Philosophy 13: 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buller, D. J. 2002. Function and design revisited. In Ariew, A., Cummins, R., and Perlman, M., eds., Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 63–112.Google Scholar
Buller, D. J. 2005. Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burge, T. 2010. Origins of Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnet, F. M. 1959. The Clonal Selection Theory of Acquired Immunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. 2008. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind, 3rd ed. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. 1960. Blind variation and selective survival as a general strategy in knowledge processes. In Yovits, M. C., and Cameron, S., eds., Self-Organizing Systems. New York: Pergamon Press, 205–231.Google Scholar
Carey, N. 2015. Junk DNA: A Journey through the Dark Matter of the Genome. Icon: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carleton, R. N., et al. 2013. Intolerance of uncertainty as a contributor to fear and avoidance symptoms of panic attacks. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 42: 328–341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, R. 2012. A teleosemantic approach to information in the brain. Biology & Philosophy 27: 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, T., et al. 2014. The function of zebra stripes. Nature Communications 5:3535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Changeux, J. P. 1985. Neuronal Man. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Changeux, J. P. and Danchin, A. 1976. Selective stabilization of developing synapses as a mechanism for the specification of neuronal networks. Nature 264: 705–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Changeux, J. P. and Dehaene, S. 1989. Neuronal models of cognitive functions. Cognition 33: 63–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chemero, A. 2009. Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, W. et al. 2015. Do glia drive synaptic and cognitive impairment in disease? Nature Neuroscience 18: 1539–1545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. M. 1986. A cognitive approach to panic disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy 24: 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. M. 1997. Panic disorder and social phobia. In Clark, D. M., and Fairburn, C. G., eds., Science and Practice of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 119–153.Google Scholar
Confer, J. C. et al. 2010. Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist 65: 110–126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crane, T. 2003. The Mechanical Mind, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, C. F. 2001. Role functions, mechanisms, and hierarchy. Philosophy of Science 68: 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, C. 2013. Functions and mechanisms: A perspectivalist view. In Huneman, P., ed., Function: Selection and Mechanisms. Dordrecht: Springer. 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, C. F. and Darden, L. 2013. In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the Life Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, F. 1989. Neural edelmanism. Trends in Neurosciences 12: 240–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowley, J. C. and Katz, L. C. 1999. Development of ocular dominance columns in the absence of retinal input. Nature Neuroscience 2: 1125–1130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowley, J. C. and Katz, L. C. 2000. Early development of ocular dominance columns. Science 290: 1321–1324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, R. 1975. Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy 72: 741–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, R. 1983. The Nature of Psychological Explanation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cziko, G. 1995. Without Miracles: Universal Selection Theory and the Second Darwinian Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Darden, L. 2006. Reasoning in Biological Discoveries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, L. and Cain, J. A. 1989. Selection type theories. Philosophy of Science 56: 106–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Volume 2. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Davies, P.S. 2001. Norms of Nature: Naturalism and the Nature of Functions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1982. The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. 1997. The Symbolic Species. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1996. Kinds of Minds. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Deppmann, D. et al. 2008. A model of neuronal competition during development. Science 320: 369–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickinson, A. and Balleine, B. 1994. Motivational control of goal-directed action. Animal Learning and Behavior 22: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doolittle, W. F. 2013. Is junk DNA bunk? A critique of ENCODE. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 5294–5300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doolittle, W. F. 2014. Natural selection through survival alone, or the possibility of Gaia. Biology and Philosophy 29: 415–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doolittle, W. F. 2017. Making the most of clade selection. Philosophy of Science 84: 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dover, G. 2000. Dear Mr. Darwin: Letters on the Evolution of Life and Human Nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1973. Contrastive statements. Philosophical Review 81: 411–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dretske, F. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1986. Misrepresentation. In Bogdan, R., ed., Belief: Form, Content, and Function. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 17–36.Google Scholar
Eddy, S. R. 2012. The C-value paradox, junk DNA and ENCODE. Current Biology 22: R898–R899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edelman, G. M. 1987. Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Eldakar, O. T., et al. 2010. The role of multilevel selection in the evolution of sexual conflict in the water strider Aquarius remigis. Evolution 64: 3183–3189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elliott, T and Shadbolt, N. R. 1998. Competition for neurotrophic factors: Ocular dominance columns. Journal of Neuroscience 18: 5850–5858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enç, B. 2002. Indeterminacy of function attributions. In. Ariew, A., Cummins, R., and Perlman, M., eds., Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 291–313.Google Scholar
ENCODE Project Consortium. 2012. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489: 57–74.CrossRef
Faucher, L. and Blanchette, I. 2011. Fearing new dangers: Phobias and the cognitive complexity of human emotions. In Adriaens, R., and De Block, A.. eds., Maladapting Minds: Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Evolutionary Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–64.Google Scholar
Feinberg, I. 1982/83. Schizophrenia: Caused by a fault in programmed synaptic elimination during adolescence? Journal of Psychiatric Research 17: 319–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, M. B. 2007. Potential implications of the harmful dysfunction analysis for the development of DSM-V and ICD 11. World Psychiatry 6: 158–159.Google ScholarPubMed
Fodor, J. A. 1984. Semantics, Wisconsin style. Synthese 59: 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1990. A Theory of Content and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2006 [1961]. History of Madness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frankland, S. M. and Greene, J. D. 2015. An architecture for encoding sentence meaning in left mid-superior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 11732–11737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fromm-Reichmann, F. 1948. Notes on the development of treatment of schizophrenics by psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Psychiatry 11: 263–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garson, J. 2006. Psychiatric Disorders and Biological Dysfunctions: Some Philosophical Questions Concerning Psychiatry. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Garson, J. 2010. Schizophrenia and the dysfunctional brain. Journal of Cognitive Science 11: 215–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, J. 2011. Selected effects functions and causal role functions in the brain: The case for an etiological approach to neuroscience. Biology and Philosophy 26: 547–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, J. 2012. Function, selection, and construction in the brain. Synthese 189: 451–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, J. 2013. The functional sense of mechanism. Philosophy of Science 80: 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, J. 2015. The Biological Mind: A Philosophical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garson, J. 2016. A Critical Overview of Biological Functions. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, J. 2017a. A generalized selected effects theory of function. Philosophy of Science 84: 523–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, J. 2017b. Against organizational functions. Philosophy of Science 84: 1093–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, J. 2017c. A “model schizophrenia”: Amphetamine psychosis and the transformation of American psychiatry. In Casper, S., and Gavrus, D., eds., The History of the Brain and Mind Sciences: Technique, Technology, Therapy. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 202–228.Google Scholar
Garson, J. 2017d. Mechanisms, Phenomena, and Functions. In Glennan, S. and Illari, P., eds., Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Mechanisms. London: Routledge, 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garson, J. Forthcoming a. How to be a function pluralist. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Garson, J. Forthcoming b. The developmental plasticity challenge to Wakefield’s view. In L. Faucher and D. Forest, eds., Defining Mental Disorder: Jerome Wakefield and His Critics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Garson, J. Forthcoming c. Do constancy mechanisms save distal content? Philosophical Quarterly.
Garson, J. and Papineau, D. In prep. Teleosemantics, selection, and learning.
Garson, J. and Piccinini, G. 2014. Functions must be performed at appropriate rates in appropriate situations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65:1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S. 1992. Nature’s Mind: The Biological Roots of Thinking, Emotions, Sexuality, Language, and Intelligence. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibson, D. A. and Ma, L. 2011. Developmental regulation of axon branching in the vertebrate nervous system. Development 138: 183–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glennan, S. 1996. Mechanisms and the nature of causation. Erkenntnis 44:49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennan, S. 2005. Modeling mechanisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 443–464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glennan, S. 2017. The New Mechanical Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, V. 2011. Prenatal stress and the origins of psychopathology: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 52: 356–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gluckman, P. and Hanson, M. eds. 2006. Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 1989. Misinformation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19: 533–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 1992. Indication and adaptation. Synthese 92: 283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 1993. Functions: Consensus without unity. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74: 196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 1994. A modern history theory of functions. Nous 28: 344–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2000. Information, arbitrariness, and selection: Comments on Maynard Smith. Philosophy of Science 67: 202–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2009. Darwinian Populations and Natural Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, R. and Griffiths, P. E. 1995. The misuse of Sober’s selection of/selection for distinction. Biology and Philosophy 10: 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. 1979. The Spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 205: 281–288.Google Scholar
Grace, A. A. 2000. Gating of information flow within the limbic system and the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Brain Research Reviews 31: 330–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, G. 2010. The Disordered Mind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grantham, T. 2001. Do operant behaviors replicate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 538–539.Google Scholar
Graur, D. et al. 2013. On the immortality of television sets: “Function” in the human genome according to the evolution-free gospel of ENCODE. Genome Biology and Evolution 5:578–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, P. E. 1992. Adaptive explanation and the concept of a vestige. In Griffiths, P., ed., Trees of Life: Essays in Philosophy of Biology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 1993. Functional analysis and proper function. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. 2006. Function, homology, and character individuation. Philosophy of Science 73: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardcastle, V. G. 1999. Understanding functions: A pragmatic approach. In Hardcastle, V. G., ed., Where Biology Meets Psychology: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 27–43.Google Scholar
Harper, K. L., et al. 2016. Mechanism of early dissemination and metastasis in Her2+ mammary cancer. Nature 540: 588–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, R. H. T. P. 1930. Report on the Bionomics of the Tsetse Fly (Glossina pallidipes Aust.) and a Preliminary Report on a New Method of Control. Peitermaritzburg: Provincial Administration of Natal.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. 2011. Is an overdose of paracetamol bad for one’s health? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62: 657–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havstad, J. C. 2011. Problems for natural selection as a mechanism. Philosophy of Science 78:512–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebb, D. O. 1949. The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Heim, C, and Nemeroff, C. B. 2001. The role of childhood trauma in the neurobiology of mood and anxiety disorders: Preclinical and clinical studies. Biological Psychiatry 49: 1023–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helgeson, C. 2015. There is no asymmetry of identity assumptions in the debate over selection and individuals. Philosophy of Science 82: 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Higham, T. E. et al. 2017. Rattlesnakes are extremely fast and variable when striking at kangaroo rats in nature: Three-dimensional high-speed kinematics at night. Scientific Reports 7: 40412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Himsworth, H. P. 1939. The mechanism of diabetes mellitus. The Lancet 234: 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, D. and McCulloch, R. 2010. Molecular mechanisms underlying the control of antigenic variation in African trypanosomes. Current Opinion in Microbiology 13: 700–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hruby, G. G. and Goswami, U. 2011. Neuroscience and reading: A review for reading education researchers. Reading Research Quarterly 46: 156–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, D. L., Langman, R. E., and Glenn, S. S. 2001. A general account of selection: Biology, immunology and behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 511–527.Google ScholarPubMed
Huttenlocher, P. R. 1979. Synaptic density in the human frontal cortex: Developmental changes and effects of aging. Brain Research 163: 195–205.Google ScholarPubMed
Innocenti, G. M. and Price, D. J. 2005. Exuberance in the development of cortical networks. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 955–965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isbell, L. A. 2009. The Fruit, the Tree, and the Serpent: Why We See so Well. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jablonka, E. and Lamb, M. J. 2005. Evolution in Four Dimensions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, P. 1997. What Minds Can Do: Intentionality in a Non-Intentional World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerne, N. 1955. The natural-selection theory of antibody formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 41: 849–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandel, E. R., et al. 2013. Principles of Neural Science, 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Katz, L.C. and Shatz, C. J. 1996. Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science 234: 1133–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauer, J. A. and Malenka, R. C.. 2007. Synaptic plasticity and addiction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8:844–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelemen, D. 1999. The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition 70: 241–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kellis, M., et al. 2014. Reply to Brunet and Doolittle: Both selected effect and causal role elements can influence human biology and disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111: E3366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingma, E. 2010. Paracetamol, poison, and polio: Why Boorse’s account of function fails to distinguish health and disease. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61: 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingma, E. 2015. Situation-specific disease and dispositional function. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67: 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, J. 2006. A proper understanding of Millikan. Acta Analytica 21: 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, J. 2008. Learning and selection. Biology and Philosophy 23: 493–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, S. A and Kutchins, H. 1992. The Selling of DSM. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klein, D. F. 1978. A proposed definition of mental illness. In. Spitzer, R. L., and Klein, D. F., eds., Critical Issues in Psychiatric Diagnosis. New York: Raven Press, 47–71.Google Scholar
Klein, D. F. 1999. Harmful dysfunction, disease, illness, and evolution. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108: 421–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraemer, D. M. 2013. Statistical theories of functions and the problem of epidemic disease. Biology and Philosophy 28: 423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraemer, D. M. 2014. Revisiting recent etiological theories of functions. Biology and Philosophy 29: 747–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krenn, H. and Aspöck, H. 2012. Form, function, and evolution of the mouthparts of blood-feeding Arthropoda. Arthropod Structure and Development 41: 101–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kriegel, U. 2013. The phenomenological intentionality research program. In Kriegel, U., ed., Phenomenological Intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, S. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Krohs, U. and Kroes, P. eds. 2009. Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. 1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A., eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 91–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsberg, J., et al. 2012. Melanomas resist T-cell therapy through inflammation-induced reversible de-differentiation. Nature 490: 412–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larison, B., et al. 2015. How the zebra got its stripes: A problem with too many solutions. Royal Society Open Science. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.140452.CrossRef
Lettvin, J. Y., et al. 1959. What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain. Proceedings of the IRE 47: 1940–1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVay, S., Stryker, M. P., and Shatz, C. J. 1978. Ocular dominance columns and their development in layer IV of the cat’s visual cortex: A quantitative study. Journal of Comparative Neurology 179: 223–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeVay, S., Wiesel, T. N., and Hubel, D. H. 1980. The development of ocular dominance columns in normal and visually deprived monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology 191: 1–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, A. 2013. Three kinds of new mechanism. Biology and Philosophy 28: 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewens, T. 2001. Sex and selection: A reply to Matthen. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52: 589–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewens, T. 2004. Organisms and Artifacts: Design in Nature and Elsewhere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. K. 1973. Counterfactuals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. K. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewontin, R. C. 1998. The evolution of cognition: Questions we will never answer. In Scarborough, D., and Sternberg, S., eds., An Invitation to Cognitive Science, vol 4: Methods, Models, and Conceptual Issues, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 107–132.Google Scholar
Lichtman, J. W., Burden, S. J., Culican, S. M., and Wong, R. O. L. 1999. Synapse formation and elimination. In Zigmond, M. J., Bloom, F. E., Landis, S. C., Roberts, J. L., and Squire, L. R., eds., Fundamental neuroscience. San Diego: Academic Press, 547–580.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O., and Marino, L. 1995. Mental disorder as a Roschian concept: A Critique of Wakefield’s “harmful dysfunction” analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 104: 411–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lilienfeld, S. O. and Marino, L. 1999. Essentialism revisited: Evolutionary theory and the concept of mental disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108: 400–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewer, B., 1987. From information to intentionality. Synthese 70: 287–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K. 2002 [1963]. On Aggression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ludewig, S. et al. 2005. Information-processing deficits and cognitive dysfunction in panic disorder. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 30: 37–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Macdonald, D. W. 2009. Encyclopedia of Mammals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Machamer, P., Darden, L., and Craver, C. F. 2000. Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclaurin, J. and Sterelny, K. What Is Biodiversity? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maley, C. J. and Piccinini, G. 2018. A unified mechanistic account of teleological functions for psychology and neuroscience. In Kaplan, D., ed., Integrating Psychology and Neuroscience: Prospects and Problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 236–256.Google Scholar
Marten, G. G. 2001. Human Ecology: Basic Concepts for Sustainable Development. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Matthen, M. 1999. Evolution, Wisconsin style: Selection and the explanation of individual traits. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50: 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, M. 2002. Origins are not essences in evolutionary systematics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32: 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthen, M. and Ariew, A. 2002. Two ways of thinking about fitness and natural selection. Journal of Philosophy 99: 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, L. 2016. On closing the gap between philosophical concepts and their usage in scientific practice: A lesson from the debate about natural selection as a mechanism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 55: 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthewson, J. 2015. Defining paradigm darwinian populations. Philosophy of Science 82: 178–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 1990. Explanation in biology. In Knowles, D., ed., Explanation and its Limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 65–72.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. 2000. The concept of information in biology. Philosophy of Science 67: 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, P. O. et. al. 2009. Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse. Nature Neuroscience 12: 342–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaughlin, P. 2001. What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, R. L., and Sperry, R. W. 1976. Retinotectal specificity: Chemoaffinity theory. In Gottlieb, G., ed., Studies on the Development of Behavior and the Nervous System. Vol. 3: Neural and Behavioral Specificity. New York: Academic Press, 111–149.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1882. A System of Logic, 8th ed. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1989a. In defense of proper functions. Philosophy of Science 56: 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1989b. Biosemantics. Journal of Philosophy 86: 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. G. 1993. White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. 2004. Varieties of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, R. 2013. Reply to Neander. In Ryder, D., Kingsbury, J., and Williford, K., eds., Millikan and Her Critics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 37–40.Google Scholar
Millstein, R. L. 2009. Populations as individuals. Biological Theory 4: 267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam-Taaheri, S. 2011. Understanding pathology in the context of physiological mechanisms: The practicality of a broken-normal view. Biology and Philosophy 26: 603–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno, A. and Mossio, M. 2015. Biological Autonomy: A Philosophical and Theoretical Inquiry. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, L. 2012. Is the philosophy of mechanism philosophy enough? Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43: 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossio, M., Saborido, C., and Moreno, A. 2009. An organizational account for biological functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 813–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, D. 2005. Can evolution explain insanity? Biology & Philosophy 20: 745–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, D., and Stich, S.. 2000. Darwin in the madhouse: Evolutionary psychology and the classification of mental disorders. In Carruthers, P. and Chamberlain, A., eds., Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language, and Meta-Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 62–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, E. 1953. Teleological explanation and teleological systems. In Ratner, S., ed., Vision and Action. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 537–558.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. 1961. The Structure of Science, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanay, B. 2013. Success semantics: The sequel. Philosophical Studies 165: 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 1983. Abnormal Psychobiology. Dissertation, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.Google Scholar
Neander, K. 1988. What does natural selection explain? Correction to Sober. Philosophy of Science 55: 422–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 1991. Functions as selected effects: The conceptual analyst’s defense. Philosophy of Science 58: 168–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 1995a. Pruning the tree of life. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46: 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 1995b. Misrepresenting and malfunctioning. Philosophical Studies 79:109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 1999. Fitness and the fate of unicorns. In. Hardcastle, V. G., ed., Where Biology Meets Psychology: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–26Google Scholar
Neander, K. 2012. Teleosemantic theories of mental content. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/content-teleological/
Neander, K. 2013. Toward an informational teleosemantics. In Ryder, D., Kingsbury, J., and Williford, K., eds., Millikan and her Critics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 21–36.Google Scholar
Neander, K. 2017a. Functional analysis and the species design. Synthese 194: 1147–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K. 2017b. A Mark of the Mental: In Defense of Informational Teleosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, K., and Rosenberg, A. 2012. Solving the circularity problem for functions. Journal of Philosophy 109: 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesse, R. M. 2000. Is depression an adaptation? Archives of General Psychiatry 57: 14–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesse, R. M. 2007. Evolution is the scientific foundation for diagnosis: Psychiatry should use it. World Psychiatry 6: 160–161.Google Scholar
Okasha, S. 2006. Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, D. 1984. Representation and explanation. Philosophy of Science 51: 550–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, D. 1987. Reality and Representation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Papineau, D. 1993. Philosophical Naturalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Papineau, D. 1997. Teleosemantics and indeterminacy. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, D. 2006. Naturalist theories of meaning. In Lepore, E. and Smith, B. C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–188.Google Scholar
Papineau, D. 2017. Teleosemantics. In Smith, D. L., ed., How Biology Shapes Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, C. 1992. A Study of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piccinini, G. 2010. The mind as neural software? Understanding functionalism, computationalism, and functional computationalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81:269–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piccinini, G. 2015. Physical Computation: A Mechanistic Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piccinini, G., and Craver, C. 2011. Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Functional analyses as mechanism sketches. Synthese 183: 283–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietroski, P. M. 1992. Intentionality and teleological error. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73: 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigliucci, M. 2001. Phenotypic Plasticity: Beyond Nature and Nurture. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pittendrigh, C. S. 1958. Adaptation, natural selection, and behavior. In Roe, A. and Simpson, G. G., eds., Behavior and Evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 390–416.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1993. Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, B. 1998. Why is a wing like a spoon? A pluralist theory of function. Journal of Philosophy 95: 215–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, C. 2001. Functions in Mind: A Theory of Intentional Content. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, D. J., Jarman, A. P., Mason, J. O., and Kind, P. C. 2011. Building Brains: An Introduction to Neural Development. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purves, D. 1988. A new theory of brain function. Quarterly Review of Biology 63: 202–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purves, D. 1994. Neural Activity and the Growth of the Brain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Purves, D. and Lichtman, J. W. 1980. Elimination of synapses in the developing nervous system. Science 210: 153–157.CrossRef
Purves, D., White, L. E., and Riddle, D. R. 1996. Is neural development Darwinian? Trends in Neuroscience 19: 460–464.Google ScholarPubMed
Pust, J. 2001. Natural selection explanation and origin essentialism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31: 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quartz, S. R. 1999. The constructivist brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 48–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quartz, S. R. and Sejnowski, T. J. 1997. The neural basis of cognitive development: A constructivist manifesto. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 537–596.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rakic, P. 1976. Prenatal genesis of connections subserving ocular dominance in the rhesus monkey. Nature 261: 467–471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramsey, W. M. 2007. Representation Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauschecker, J. P. 1995. Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex. Trends in Neurosciences 18: 36–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, R. C. 2007. Evolutionary Psychology as Maladapted Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richters, J. and Hinshaw, S. 1999. The abduction of disorder in psychiatry. Journal of Abnormal Psychiatry 108: 438–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, M. 2015. The Evolution of Everything: How New Ideas Emerge. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. S. and Ehrlich, P. R. 2008. Natural selection and cultural rates of change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 105: 3416–3420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, P. C. and St. Clair, S. B. 2016. Quaking aspen in Utah: Integrating recent science with management. Rangelands 38: 266–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolli, C. G., et al. 2010. Impact of tumor cell cytoskeleton organization on invasiveness and migration: A microchannel-based approach. PLoS ONE 5: e8726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, A. 2018. Making mechanism interesting. Synthese 95:11–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, A and Neander, K. 2009. Are homologies (selected effect or causal role) function free? Philosophy of Science 76: 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, M. J., Klyubin, I., Cullen, W. K., and Anwyl, R. 2003. Synaptic plasticity in animal models of early alzheimer’s disease. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 358:821–828.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruse, M. E. 1973. The Philosophy of Biology. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. E. 2002. Evolutionary biology and teleological thinking. In Ariew, A., Cummins, R., and Perlman, M., eds., Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–62.Google Scholar
Saborido, C. and Moreno, A. 2015. Biological pathology from an organizational perspective. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36: 83–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saborido, C., Mossio, M., and Moreno, A. 2011. Biological organization and cross-generation functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62: 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salkovskis, P. M. 1991. The importance of behaviour in the maintenance of anxiety and panic: A cognitive account. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 19: 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. 1989. Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S. 1998. Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, S. 2013. Information in animal communication: When and why does it matter? In Stegmann, U., ed., Animal Communication Theory: Information and Influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, K. 1993. Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schlosser, G. 1998. Self-re-production and functionality: A systems-theoretical approach to teleological explanation. Synthese 116: 303–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, P. 2012. How frogs see the world: Putting Millikan’s teleosemantics to the test. Philosophia 40:483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, P. 2018. Perceiving the world outside: How to solve the distality problem for informational teleosemantics. The Philosophical Quarterly 68: 349–369.Google Scholar
Schulz, A. 2018. Efficient Cognition: The Evolution of Representational Decision-Making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, W. and Dickinson, A. 2000. Neuronal coding of prediction errors. Annual Review of Neuroscience 23: 473–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, P. H. 1999. Proper function and recent selection. Philosophy of Science 66: S210–S222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, P. H. 2002. The continuing usefulness account of proper function. In Ariew, A., Cummins, R., and Perlman, M., eds., Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 244–260.Google Scholar
Schwartz, P. H. 2007. Defining dysfunction: Natural selection, design, and drawing a line. Philosophy of Science 74: 364–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, P. H. 2014. Reframing the disease debate and defending the biostatistical theory. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39: 572–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedgwick, P. 1981. Illness: Mental and otherwise. In Caplan, A. L., Engelhardt, H. T. Jr., and McCartney, J. J., eds., Concepts of Health and Disease: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Addison-Wesley, 119–29.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., and Marler, P. 1980. Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Animal Behaviour 28: 1070–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, N. 2007. Consumers need information: Supplementing Teleosemantics with an Input Condition. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75: 404–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shea, N. 2013. Inherited representations are read in development. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skipper, R. A. and Millstein, R. L. 2005. Thinking about evolutionary mechanisms: Natural selection. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36:327–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smaldino, P. E. and McElreath, R. 2016. The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science 3: 160384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, S. H. 1973. Amphetamine psychosis: A “model” schizophrenia mediated by catecholamines. American Journal of Psychiatry 130: 61–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sober, E. 1984. The Nature of Selection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sober, E. 1995. Natural selection and distributive explanation: A reply to Neander. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46: 384–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. and Wilson, D. S. 1998. Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spector, F., and Maurer, M. 2009. Synesthesia: A new approach to understanding the development of perception. Developmental Psychology 45: 175–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperry, R. W. 1965. Embryogenesis of behavioral nerve nets. In Dehaan, R. L. and Urspring, H., eds., Organogenesis. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 161–185.Google Scholar
Spitzer, R. L. 1999. Harmful dysfunction and the DSM analysis of mental disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108: 430–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R. L. and Endicott, J. 1978. Medical and mental disorder: Proposed definition and criteria. In Spitzer, R. L., and Klein, D. F., eds., Critical Issues in Psychiatric Diagnosis. New York: Raven Press,15–39.Google Scholar
Stegmann, U. 2009. A consumer-based teleosemantics for animal signals. Philosophy of Science 76: 864–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, A. H., Barres, B. A., and Stevens, B. 2012. The complement system: An unexpected role in synaptic pruning during development and disease. Annual Review of Neuroscience 35: 369–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterelny, K. 1990. The Representational Theory of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. 1995. Basic minds. Philosophical Perspectives 9: 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2000. The “genetic program” program: A commentary on Maynard Smith on information in biology. Philosophy of Science 67: 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2003. Thought in a Hostile World: The Evolution of Human Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. 2008. Real intentionality 3: Why intentionality entails consciousness. In Strawson, G., ed., Real Materialism and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L. 2006. Toward mapping the evolved functional organization of mind and brain. In Sober, E., ed., Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, 3rd ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 175–95.Google Scholar
Tremblay, M., Lowery, R. L., and Majewska, A K. 2010. Microglial interactions with synapses are modulated by visual experience. PIOS Biology 8: e1000527.Google ScholarPubMed
Uhlhaas, P. J. and Mishara, A. L. 2007. Perceptual anomalies in schizophrenia: Integrating phenomenology and cognitive neuroscience. Schizophrenia Bulletin 33: 142–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varela, F. 1979. Principles of Biological Autonomy. Elsevier: North Holland.Google Scholar
Wagner, A. D., Bunge, S. A., and Badre, D. 2004. Cognitive control, semantic memory, and priming: Contributions from prefrontal cortex. In Gazzaniga, M., ed., The Cognitive Neurosciences, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 709–726.Google Scholar
Wakefield, J. C. 1992. The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist 47: 373–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. C. 1999a. Evolutionary versus prototype analyses of the concept of disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108: 374–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. C. 1999b. Mental disorder as a black box essentialist concept. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108: 465–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakefield, J. C. 2000. Spandrels, vestigial organs, and such: Reply to Murphy and Woolfolk’s “The harmful dysfunction analysis of mental disorder.” Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 7: 253–269.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. M. 1996. Fitness and function. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47: 553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, D. M. 1998. The scope of selection: Sober and Neander on what natural selection explains. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76: 250–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, D. M. and Ariew, A. 1996. A taxonomy of functions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26: 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. 2011. The Myth of Junk DNA. Seattle: Discovery Institute Press.Google Scholar
Wiesel, T. N. and Hubel, D. H. 1963. Single-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. Journal of Neurophysiology 26: 1003–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisel, T. N. and Hubel, D. H. 1965. Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology 28: 1029–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggs, C. L. and Martin, A. 1998. Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 8: 227–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S. 2002. Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. 1972. Teleology and the logical structure of function statements. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 3: 1–80.Google Scholar
Witten, I. B., et al. 2011. Recombinase-driver rat lines: tools, techniques, and optogenetic application to dopamine-mediated reinforcement. Neuron 72: 721–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, R. O. L. and Lichtman, J. W. 2002. Synapse elimination. In. Squire, L. R., Bloom, F. E., McConnell, S. K., Roberts, J. L., Spitzer, N. C. and Zigmond, M. J., eds., Fundamental Neuroscience, 2nd edn. Amsterdam: Academic Press,533–554.Google Scholar
Woolfolk, R. L. 1999. Malfunction and mental disorder. The Monist 82: 658–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization Press.
Wouters, A. G. 1995. Viability explanation. Biology and Philosophy 10: 435–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wouters, A. G. 2013. Biology’s functional perspective: Roles, advantage, and organization. In Kampourakis, K., ed., The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer. 455–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. 1973. Functions. Philosophical Review 82: 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, L. 1976. Teleological Explanations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wright, L. 2013. Epilogue. In Huneman, P., ed., Function: Selection and Mechanisms. 233–243. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. Z. 1964. A Model of the Brain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar