Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-l4dq5 Total loading time: 1.906 Render date: 2022-06-27T12:35:42.666Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }
Treaties in Motion Treaties in Motion
The Evolution of Treaties from Formation to Termination
Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

Book contents

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2020

Malgosia Fitzmaurice  and
Panos Merkouris
Malgosia Fitzmaurice
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Panos Merkouris
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Treaties in Motion
The Evolution of Treaties from Formation to Termination
 , pp. 340 - 371
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

References

Primary Sources

Abi-Saab, G et al (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Bloomsbury 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ago, R, ‘Die Internationalen Organisationen und Ihre Funktionen im inneren Tätigkeitsgebiet der Staaten’ in Wehberg, H, Schätzel, W, and Schlochauer, H-J (eds), Rechtsfragen der internationalen Organisation: Festschrift für Hans Wehberg zu seinem 70 Geburtstag (Vittorio Klostermann 1956) 20Google Scholar
Alvarez, JE, International Organisations as Law-Makers (OUP 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzilotti, D, Cours de Droit International, Tome I (Sirey 1929)Google Scholar
Aristotle, , CategoriesGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, , MetaphysicsGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, , PhysicsGoogle Scholar
Aust, A, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (3rd edn, CUP 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azaria, D, Treaties on Transit of Energy via Pipelines and Countermeasures (OUP 2005)Google Scholar
Baetens, F, ‘Ejusdem Generis and Noscitur a Sociis’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 133Google Scholar
Balashov, Y, ‘Persistence’ in Callender, E (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time (OUP 2011) 14Google Scholar
Berman, F and Bentley, D, ‘Treaties and Other International Instruments – I General Definition, Treaty Formalities’ in Roberts, I (ed), Satow’s Diplomatic Practice (7th edn, OUP 2017) 599Google Scholar
Berman, F and Bentley, D, ‘Treaties and Other International Instruments – II Most Common Forms: Treaty/Convention/Agreement/Protocol’ in Roberts, I (ed), Satow’s Diplomatic Practice (7th edn, OUP 2017) 608Google Scholar
Berman, F and Bentley, D, ‘Treaties and Other International Instruments – III Pact, Act, Modus Vivendi, Declaration, Exchange of Notes, Memorandum of Understanding’ in Roberts, I (ed), Satow’s Diplomatic Practice (7th edn, OUP 2017) 616Google Scholar
Berman, F and Bentley, D, ‘Treaties and Other International Instruments – IV Ratification, Accession, Acceptance and Approval, Treaty Succession’ in Roberts, I (ed), Satow’s Diplomatic Practice (7th edn, OUP 2017) 638Google Scholar
Bilder, R, ‘Beyond Compliance: Helping Nations Cooperate’ in Shelton, D (ed), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System (OUP 2003) 65Google Scholar
Birnie, P, ‘Legal Techniques of Settling Disputes: The Soft Settlement Approach’ in Butler, WE (ed), Perestroika and International Law (Martinus Nijhoff 1990) 175Google Scholar
Birnie, P, International Regulation of Whaling: From Conservation of Whaling to Conservation of Whales and Regulation of Whale-Watching (Oceana Publications 1985) 549Google Scholar
Birnie, P, ‘The Status of Environmental “Soft Law”: Trends and Examples with Special Focus on IMO Norms’, in Ringbom, H (ed), Competing Norms in the Law of Marine Environmental Protection, Focus on Ship Safety and Pollution Prevention (Kluwer Law International 1997) 39Google Scholar
Bjorge, E, The Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties (OUP 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blix, H, Treaty-Making Power (Stevens & Sons 1960)Google Scholar
Blokker, NM, ‘Constituent Instruments: Creating a Genie That May Escape from the Bottle?’ in Cogan, JK, Hurd, I, and Johnstone, I (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations (OUP 2013) 943Google Scholar
Bodeau-Livinec, P and Morgan-Foster, J, ‘Article 61’ in Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP 2011) 1382Google Scholar
Bos, M, A Methodology of International Law (North-Holland 1984)Google Scholar
Bowett, DW, ‘Treaties and State Responsibility’ in Bardonnet, D et al (eds), Mélanges Virally (Pedone 1991) 137Google Scholar
Boyle, A, ‘Some Reflections on Relationship of Treaties and Soft Law’ in Gowlland-Debbas, V (ed), Multilateral Treaty–Making: Current Status of Challenges to and Reforms Needed in International Legislative Process (Springer 2000) 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braumann, C and Reinisch, A, ‘Effet Utile’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 47Google Scholar
Brierly, JL, The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace (Clarendon Press 1928)Google Scholar
Brölmann, C, ‘Limits of the Treaty Paradigm’ in Fitzmaurice, M and Craven, M (eds), Interrogating the Treaty: Essays in the Contemporary Law of Treaties (Wolf Legal Publishers 2005) 29Google Scholar
Brölmann, C, ‘Specialized Rules of Treaty Interpretation: International Organizations’ in Hollis, DB (ed) The Oxford Guide to Treaties (OUP 2012) 507Google Scholar
Brölmann, C, ‘Typologies and the “Essential Juridical Character” of Treaties’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP 2018) 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, J, ‘Reweaving the Fabric of International Law? Patterns of Consent in the Environmental Framework Agreements’ in Wolfrum, R and Röben, V (eds), Developments of International Law in Treaty-Making (Springer 2005) 101Google Scholar
Brunner, C, Force Majeure and Hardship under General Contract Principles: Exemption for Non-performance in International Arbitration (Kluwer Law International 2009)Google Scholar
Buga, I, ‘Subsequent Practice and Treaty Modification’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP 2018) 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buga, I, The Modification of Treaties by Subsequent Practice (OUP 2018)Google Scholar
Callender, C, What Makes Time Special? (OUP 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camps, M, ‘Britain and the European Community 1955–1963’ in Mayne, R (ed), The Recovery of Europe (Weidenfeld & Nicholson 1970)Google Scholar
Cantor, G, Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers (Jourdain, P tr, Dover Publications 1915)Google Scholar
Capitant, H, De la cause des obligations (contrats, engagements unilatéraux, legs) (Dalloz 1927)Google Scholar
Chanaki, A, L’ adaptation des traités dans les temps (Bruylant 2013)Google Scholar
Chinkin, C, ‘Human Rights’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP 2018) 509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinkin, C, ‘Normative Development in International Legal System’ in Shelton, D (ed), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System (OUP 2000) 21Google Scholar
Christakis, T, ‘Article 56’ in Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP 2011) 1251Google Scholar
Cohen, MG, ‘Desuetude and Obsolescence of Treaties’ in Cannizzaro, E (ed), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (OUP 2011) 350Google Scholar
Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe and BIICL (eds), Treaty-Making: Expression of Consent to Be Bound by a Treaty (Kluwer Law International 2001)Google Scholar
Crema, L, ‘Subsequent Agreements Practice and Subsequent Practice within and outside the Vienna Convention’ in Nolte, G (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP 2013) 17Google Scholar
d’Argent, P, ‘Contra Proferentem’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 241Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J, ‘The Multi-dimensional Process of Interpretation: Content-Determination and Law Ascertainment Distinguished’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D, and Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP 2015) 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahm, G, Delbrück, J, and Wolfrum, R, Völkerrecht Band I/3 (2nd edn, de Gruyter 2002)Google Scholar
de Vattel, E, The Law of Nations or Principles on the Law of Nature Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (GGJ and J Robinson 1793)Google Scholar
de Visscher, C, Problémes d’ interprétation judiciaire en droit international public (Pedone 1963)Google Scholar
Descartes, R, Principles of Philosophy (Miller, RP and Miller, VR tr, Kluwer 1983)Google Scholar
Djeffal, C, Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: A Functional Reconstruction (CUP 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, P-M, ‘Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties: Between Memory and Prophecy’ in Cannizzaro, (ed) The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (OUP 2011) 123Google Scholar
Dupuy, R-J, ‘Declaratory Law and Programmatory Law: From Revolutionary Custom to “Soft Law”’ in Akkerman, RJ, van Krieken, PJ and Pannenborg, Ch (eds), Declarations on Principles: A Quest for Universal Peace (Sijthoff 1979) 252Google Scholar
Earman, J and Norton, JD, ‘Infinite Pains: The Trouble with Supertasks’ in Morton, A and Stich, S (eds), Paul Benacerraf: The Philosopher and His Critics (Blackwell 1996) 231Google Scholar
Eddington, A, The Nature of the Physical World (CUP 1928)Google Scholar
Einstein, A et al, The Principle of Relativity (Perrett, W and Jeffery, GB tr, Dover Books 1952)Google Scholar
Elias, O and Lim, CL, The Paradox of Consensualism in International Law (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff 1998)Google Scholar
Elias, TO, The Modern Law of Treaties (Oceana 1974)Google Scholar
Emerson, RW, ‘Nature’ in Slater, J, Ferguson, AR and Carr, JF (eds), Collected Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Vol III: Essays (Beknap Press 1983) 105Google Scholar
Engelen, FA, Interpretation of Tax Treaties under International Law: A Study of Articles 31, 32, and 33 of Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Their Application to Tax Treaties (International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation 2004)Google Scholar
Fenwick, CG, International Law (The American Law Book Co 1924)Google Scholar
Feynman, R, The Meaning of It All: Thoughts of a Citizen–Scientist (Helix Books 1998)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Angst of the Exceptio Inadimplenti Non Est Adimplendum in International Law’ in Bartels, L and Paddeu, F (eds), Exceptions in International Law (OUP 2020)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Exceptional Circumstances and Treaty Commitments’ in Hollis, D (ed), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (OUP 2012) 605Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The Practical Working of the Law of Treaties’ in Evans, MD (ed), International Law (5th edn, CUP 2019) 138Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The Whaling Convention and Thorny Issues of Interpretation’ in Fitzmaurice, M and Tamada, D (eds), Whaling in the Antarctic: Significance and Implications of the ICJ Judgment (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff 2016) 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M and Costelloe, DG, ‘Lawmaking by Treaty: Conclusion of Treaties and Evolution of Treaty Regimes in Practice’ in Brölmann, C and Radi, Y (eds), Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Lawmaking (Edward Elgar 2016) 111Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M and Elias, O, Contemporary Issues in the Law of Treaties (Eleven International Publishing 2005)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M and Merkouris, P, ‘Uniformity versus Specialization (1): The Quest for a Uniform Law of Inter-State Treaties’ in Tams, C, Tzanakopoulos, A, and Zimmermann, A (eds), Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties (Edward Elgar 2014) 341Google Scholar
Foreign Office, Handbook of Commercial Treaties etc, With Foreign Powers (4th edn, HM Stationery Office 1931)Google Scholar
Fox, H, ‘Article 31(3)(a) and (b) of the Vienna Convention and the Kasikili/Sedudu Island Case’ in Fitzmaurice, M, Elias, O, and Merkouris, P (eds), The Issues of Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2010) 59Google Scholar
Franck, T, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (OUP 1995)Google Scholar
Friedrich, J, International Environmental “Soft Law”: The Functions and Limits of Nonbinding Instruments in International Environmental Law and Governance (Springer 2014)Google Scholar
Gaja, G, ‘Unruly Treaty Reservations’ in Ago, R (ed), Droit international à l'heure de sa codification: études en l'honneur de Roberto Ago, Vol 1 (Giuffrè 1987) 307Google Scholar
Gardiner, R, ‘Characteristics of the Vienna Convention Rules on Treaty Interpretation’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP 2018) 335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, R, Treaty Interpretation (2nd edn, OUP 2015)Google Scholar
Geny, F, Méthode d’ interprétation et sources en droit privé positif: Essai critique, Vol I (LGDJ 1954)Google Scholar
Giegerich, T, ‘Article 56’ in Dӧrr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer 2018) 1039Google Scholar
Giegerich, T, ‘Article 60’ in Dӧrr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer 2018) 1095Google Scholar
Giegerich, T, ‘Article 62’ in Dӧrr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer 2018) 1143Google Scholar
Goehring, T, ‘Treaty-Making and Treaty Evolution’ in Bodansky, D, Brunnée, J and Hey, E (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (OUP 2008) 467Google Scholar
Goellner, A, Pre-caducité, caducité et désuétude en matiere de droit international public (essai juridique) (Rousseau 1939)Google Scholar
Gomaa, MM, Suspension or Termination of Treaties on Grounds of Breach (Martinus Nijhoff 1996)Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, A, Equity and Equitable Principles in the World Trade Organization: Addressing Conflicts and Overlaps between the WTO and Other Regimes (Routledge 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig, D, Intertemporality and the Law of Treaties (BIICL 2001)Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A, ‘Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes of Motion’ in Samon, WC (ed), Zeno’s Paradoxes (Bobbs-Merrill 1970) 200Google Scholar
Hafner, G, ‘The Drawbacks and Lacunae of the VCLT’ in Hafner, G et al (eds), Völkerrecht und die Dynamik der Menschenrechte: Liber Amicorum Wolfram Karl (2012) 421Google Scholar
Handl, G, ‘International “Lawmaking” by Conferences of the Parties and Other Politically Mandated Bodies: Comment’ in Wolfrum, R and Röben, V (eds), Development of International Law in Treaty-Making (Springer 2005) 127Google Scholar
Hart, HLA, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Clarendon Press 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, S, ‘Persistence through Time’ in Loux, MJ and Zimmerman, DW (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics (OUP 2005) 315Google Scholar
Henin, PF, ‘In Pari Materia Interpretation in Treaty Law’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 211Google Scholar
Hershey, AS, The Essentials of International Public Law and Organization (rev edn, MacMillan 1927)Google Scholar
Higgins, R, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (OUP 1994)Google Scholar
Higgins, R, ‘Some Observations on the Inter-temporal Rule in International Law’ in Makarczyk, J (ed), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21st Century (Kluwer Law International 1996) 173Google Scholar
Hinton, CH, ‘What Is the Fourth Dimension?’ in Hinton, CH (ed), Scientific Romances No 1 (W Swan Schonneschein 1884) 1Google Scholar
Hobbes, T, Elements of Philosophy – The First Section, Concerning Body (R and W Leybourn 1656)Google Scholar
Horwich, P, Asymmetries in Time (MIT Press 1987)Google Scholar
Hoyt, EC, The Unanimity Rule in the Revision of Treaties: A Re-Examination (Martinus Nijhoff 1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, MO, The Permanent Court of International Justice: A Treatise (The MacMillan Co 1934) 551Google Scholar
Jennings, RY and Watts, AD (eds), Oppenheim's International Law (9th edn, Longman 1996)Google Scholar
Jennings, RY and Watts, AD (eds), Oppenheim’s International Law (9th edn, OUP 2008)Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (Routledge 2011)Google Scholar
Kapteyn, PJG, van Themaat, PV, Introduction to the Law of the European Communities: From Maastricht to Amsterdam (Gormley, LW ed, 3rd edn, Kluwer Law International 1998)Google Scholar
Kassoti, E, The Juridical Nature of Unilateral Acts of States in International Law (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J, The Concept of Treaty in International Law (Kluwer Law International 1996)Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, ‘Reluctant “Grundnormen”: Articles 31(3)(c) and 42 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Fragmentation of International Law’ in Craven, M, Fitzmaurice, M, and Vogiatzi, M (eds), Time, History and International Law (Martinus Nijhoff 2007) 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, PD, ‘Contemporary Responses to Agrippa’s Trilemma’ in Greco, J (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism (OUP 2008) 484Google Scholar
Klingler, J, ‘Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Altrerius’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 73Google Scholar
Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018)Google Scholar
Kohen, M, ‘Keeping Subsequent Agreements and Practice in Their Right Limits’ in Nolte, G (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP 2013) 34Google Scholar
Kolb, R, Good Faith in International Law (Hart 2017)Google Scholar
Kolb, R, Interprétation et création du droit international: esquisses d'une herméneutique juridique moderne pour le droit international public (Bruylant 2006)Google Scholar
Kontou, N, The Termination of Treaties in Light of New Customary International Law (Clarendon Press 1994)Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (CUP 1989)Google Scholar
Krieger, H, ‘Article 68’ in Dӧrr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer 2018) 1259Google Scholar
Kritsiotis, D, ‘The Object and Purpose of a Treaty’s Object and Purpose’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP 2018) 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, TJ, Principles of International Law (7th edn, MacMillan 1923)Google Scholar
Leca, J, Les techniques de révision des conventions internationales (LGDJ 1961)Google Scholar
Leibniz, GW, The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence: With Extracts from Newton's ‘Principia’ and ‘Optiks’ (edited with introduction and notes by Alexander, HG, MUP 1977)Google Scholar
Letsas, G, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (OUP 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, U, On the Interpretation of Treaties (Springer 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, C, Treaty Interpretation under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A New Round for Codification (Springer 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lost-Sieminska, D, ‘The International Maritime Organization’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP 2018) 907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, V, ‘Sustainable Development and Unsustainable Arguments’ in Boyle, A and Freestone, D (eds), International Law and Sustainable Development: Past Achievements and Future Challenges (OUP 1999) 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, A, ‘Ex Abundante Cautela’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 115Google Scholar
Madison, J, ‘Federalist Paper No 43’ in Rossiter, Cl (ed), The Federalist Papers (New American Library 1961) 278Google Scholar
Cicero, Marcus Tullius, De OfficiisGoogle Scholar
Matsushita, M et al (eds), The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (3rd edn, OUP 2015)Google Scholar
McNair, A, The Law of Treaties (Clarendon Press 1961)Google Scholar
McNair, AD and Watts, AD, The Legal Effects of War (4th edn, CUP 1966)Google Scholar
McWhinney, E, ‘The Time Dimension in International Law, Historical Relativism and Intertemporal Law’ in Makarczyk, J (ed), Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs (Martinus Nijhoff 1984) 179Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration: Normative Shadows in Plato’s Cave (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘In Dubio Mitius’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 259Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘“Third Party” Considerations and “Corrective Interpretation” in the Interpretative Use of Travaux Préparatoires − Is It Fahrenheit 451 for Preparatory Work?’ in Fitzmaurice, M, Elias, O, and Merkouris, P (eds), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Martinus Nijhoff 2010) 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkowski, H, ‘Space and Time’ as reprinted and translated in Einstein, A and Davis, FA (eds), The Principle of Relativity (Dover Publications 1952) 73Google Scholar
Minon, A, ‘Per Argumentum a Fortiori’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 197Google Scholar
Mitchell, AD and Voon, T, ‘The Rule of Necessary Implication’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 331Google Scholar
Moeckli, D and White, ND, ‘Treaties as “Living Instruments”’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP 2018) 136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, JB, A Digest of International Law (Government Printing Office 1906)Google Scholar
Murphy, S, ‘The Relevance of Subsequent Agreement and Subsequent Practice in Interpretation of Treaties’ in Nolte, G (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP 2013) 82Google Scholar
Newton, I, De GravitationeGoogle Scholar
Nollkaemper, A, The Legal Regime for Transboundary Water Pollution: Between Discretion and Constraint (Kluwer Law International 1993) 252Google Scholar
Nolte, G (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP 2013)Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L, International Law – Vol 1: Peace (4th edn, Longmans 1928)Google Scholar
Paddeu, F, Justification and Excuse in International Law: Concept and Theory of General Defences (CUP 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmenides, , On NatureGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (CUP 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peat, D, Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals (CUP 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Article 19 of the 1969 Vienna Convention’ in Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP 2011) 405Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Article 38’ in Zimmermann, A et al (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (2nd edn, OUP 2012) 731Google Scholar
Pellet, A and Müller, D, ‘Reservations to Human Rights Treaties: Not an Absolute Evil …’ in Fastenrath, U (ed), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma (OUP 2011) 521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, A and Müller, D, ‘Reservations to Treaties: An Objection to a Reservation Is Definitely Not an Acceptance’ in Cannizzaro, E (ed), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (OUP 2011) 37Google Scholar
Pergantis, V, The Paradigm of State Consent in the Law of Treaties (Edward Elgar 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philo, , De aeternitate mundiGoogle Scholar
Plato, , CratylusGoogle Scholar
Plutarch, , TheseusGoogle Scholar
Pulkowski, D, ‘Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali/Generalia Specialibus Non Derogant’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 161Google Scholar
Quoc Dinh, N, Pellet, A, and Daillier, P, Droit International Public (7th edn, LGDJ 2002)Google Scholar
Ress, G, ‘The Interpretation of the Charter’ in Simma, B (ed), The Charter of the United Nations: a Commentary (2nd edn, OUP 2002) 13Google Scholar
Reuter, P, Introduction to the Law of Treaties (Mico, J and Haggenmacher, P tr, 2nd edn, Routledge 1995)Google Scholar
Rosenne, S, Breach of Treaty (Grotius 1985)Google Scholar
Rosenne, S, Developments in the Law of Treaties 1945–1986 (CUP 1989)Google Scholar
Rosenne, S, The Time Factor in the Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (Sythoff 1960)Google Scholar
Roucounas, E, A Landscape of Contemporary Theories of International Law (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff 2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, C, Principes généraux du droit international public: Tome 1 (Pedone 1944)Google Scholar
Russell, B, The History of Western Philosophy (Simon & Schuster 1967)Google Scholar
Sadat-Akhavi, SA, Methods of Resolving Conflicts between Treaties (Brill 2003)Google Scholar
Saganek, P, Unilateral Acts of States in Public International Law (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff 2015)Google Scholar
Sands, P and Klein, P, Bowett’s Law of International Institutions (6th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2009)Google Scholar
Saramago, J, Blindness (Harvest Books 1999)Google Scholar
Sato, T, Evolving Constitutions of International Organizations: A Critical Analysis of the Interpretative Framework of the Constituent Instruments of International Organizations (Kluwer Law International 1996)Google Scholar
Schermers, HG and Blokker, NM, International Institutional Law: Unity with Diversity (5th rev edn, Martinus Nijhoff 2011)Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G, A Manual of International Law (3rd edn, Stevens 1952)Google Scholar
Schwebel, St, ‘May Preparatory Work Be Used to Correct Rather Than Confirm the “Clear” Meaning of a Treaty Provision?’ in Makarczyk, J and Skubiszewski, K (eds), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21st Century (Kluwer Law International 1996) 541Google Scholar
Seidl-Hohenveldern, I, International Economic Law (Springer 1989)Google Scholar
Shaw, MN and Fournet, C, ‘Article 62’ in Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP 2011) 1411Google Scholar
Shelton, D, ‘Introduction: Law, Non-Law and the Problems of “Soft Law”’ in Shelton, D (ed), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System (OUP 2000) 1Google Scholar
Sicilianos, L-A, Les réactions décentralisées à l’ illiref: des contre-mesures à la légitime défense (LGDJ 1990)Google Scholar
Simma, B and Tams, C, ‘Article 60’ in Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP 2011) 1351Google Scholar
Simma, B and Hernández, G, ‘Legal Consequences of an Impermissible Reservation to a Human Rights Treaty: Where Do We Stand?’ in Cannizzaro, E (ed), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (OUP 2011) 60Google Scholar
Simplicius, , On Aristotle’s Physics (Bloomsbury 1997)Google Scholar
Sinclair, I, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd edn, MUP 1984)Google Scholar
Skubiszewski, K, ‘A New Source of the Law of Nations Resolutions of International Organisations’ in Guggenheim, P and Battelli, M (eds), Recueil d’études de droit international en hommage à Paul Guggenheim (Imprimerie de la Tribune de Genève 1968) 508Google Scholar
Skubiszewski, K, Uchwaly Prawotworcze Organizacji Miendzynarodowych. Przeglad Zagadnien I Analiza Wstepna (Law-Making Resolutions of International Organisations. Survey of Problems and the Preliminary Analysis) (Praca Wydana z Zasiłku Polskiej Akademii Nauk 1965)Google Scholar
Solomou, A, ‘Exceptions to a Rule Must Be Narrowly Construed’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 359Google Scholar
Sorensen, R, A Brief History of the Paradox: Philosophy and the Labyrinths of the Mind (OUP 2003)Google Scholar
Sur, S, L’ interprétation en droit international public (LGDJ 1974)Google Scholar
Surbiguet, MF and Vagogne, P, Liste des traites et accords de la France en vigueur au 1er octobre 1988 (Ministère des Affaires étrangères 1988)Google Scholar
Szasz, PC, ‘International Norm-Making’ in Brown Weiss, E (ed), Environmental Change and International Law: New Challenges and Dimensions (UN University Press 1992) 41Google Scholar
Sztucki, J, ‘Reflections on International “Soft Law”’ in Ramberg, J, Bring, O, and Mahmoudi, S (eds), Festschrift till Lars Hjerner: Studies in International Law (Norstedts 1990) 549Google Scholar
Tammes, AJP, ‘Soft Law’ in Arbor, ER (ed), Essays on International and Comparative Law in Honour of Judge Erades (Martinus Nijhoff 1983) 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tams, C, ‘Regulating Treaty Breaches’ in Bowman, and Kritsiotis, (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP 2018) 440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavernier, P, Recherches sur l’ application dans le temps des actes et des règles en droit international public: problèmes de droit intertemporel ou de droit transitoire (LGDJ 1979)Google Scholar
Taylor, H, A Treatise on Public International Law (Callaghan 1901)Google Scholar
Tennyson, A, UlyssesGoogle Scholar
Thirlway, H, ‘The Sources of International Law’ in Evans, M (ed), International Law (4th edn, OUP 2014) 95Google Scholar
Tunkin, GI, Theory of International Law (WE Butler tr, Harvard University Press 1974)Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A, ‘Article 68 in 56’ in Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP 2011) 1564Google Scholar
Tzeng, P, ‘The Principles of Contemporaneous and Evolutionary Interpretation’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 387Google Scholar
Ulfstein, G, ‘Treaty Bodies and Regimes’ in Hollis, DB (ed), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (OUP 2012) 428Google Scholar
Ulfstein, G and Werksman, J, ‘The Kyoto Compliance System: Towards Hard Enforcement’ in Stokke, OS, Hovi, J, and Ulfstein, G (eds), Implementing the Climate Regime: International Compliance (Earthscan 2005) 39Google Scholar
United Nations, Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties: Handbook (United Nations 2003)Google Scholar
Vamvoukos, A, Termination of Treaties in International Law: The Doctrines of Rebus sic Stantibus and Desuetude (Clarendon Press 1985)Google Scholar
van Hoof, GJH, Rethinking the Sources of International Law (Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1983)Google Scholar
Villiger, ME, Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Brill 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virally, M, ‘The Sources of International Law’ in Sorensen, M (ed), Manual of Public International Law (Macmillan 1968) 1564Google Scholar
Westlake, J, International Law (2nd edn, Sn 1910)Google Scholar
Whitehead, AN, Essays in Science and Philosophy (Philosophical Library 1947)Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R, ‘Legitimacy and International Law from a Legal Perspective: Some Introductory Considerations’ in Wolfrum, R and Röben, V (eds), Legitimacy in International Law (Springer 2008) 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, J, Intertemporal Linguistics in International Law: Beyond Contemporaneous and Evolutionary Treaty Interpretation (Hart Publishing 2019)Google Scholar
Yotova, R, ‘Compliance with Domestic Law: An Implied Condition in Treaties Conferring Rights and Protections on Foreign Nationals and Their Property?’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer 2018) 307Google Scholar
Yü, T-C, The Interpretation of Treaties (Sn 1927)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Secondary Sources

‘Editorial Comments: Withdrawing from the Ever Closer Union?” (2016) 53/6 CMLR 1491Google Scholar
‘Ramsar Convention: Progress Achieved’ (1987) 17/5 EP&L 179Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, G, ‘General Course of Public International Law’ (1987/VII) 207 RdC 15Google Scholar
Ackermann, T and Fenrich, K, ‘Motion and Rest: International Law’s Responsiveness towards Terrorism, Mass Surveillance, and Self-Defence’ (2017) 77 ZaöRV 745Google Scholar
Agius, M, ‘The Invocation of Necessity in International Law’ (2009) 56/2 NILR 95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, R, ‘Amending Constitutional Amendment Rules’ (2015) 13/3 Int’lJConstL 655Google Scholar
Ambrus, M and Wessel, R, ‘Between Pragmatism and Predictability: Temporariness in International Law’ (2014) 45 NYIL 3Google Scholar
Arato, J, ‘’Subsequent Practice and Evolutive Interpretation’ (2010) 9/3 Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aust, A, ‘The Theory and Practice of Informal International Instruments’ (1986) 35 ICLQ 787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bantekas, I, ‘Uniformity in Model Laws as Subsequent Practice under Article 31 of Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (2015) 20 ARIEL 145Google Scholar
Baratta, R, ‘Should Invalid Reservations to Human Rights Treaties Be Disregarded?’ (2000) 11 EJIL 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basaran, I, ‘The Evolution of the International Maritime Organization’s Role in Shipping’ (2016) 47/1 JMarL&Com 101Google Scholar
Bassiouni, Ch, ‘Functional Approach to “General Principles of International Law”’ (1989–90) 11 MichJInt’lL 768Google Scholar
Baxter, RR, ‘International Law in Her Infinite Variety’ (1980) 29 ICLQ 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, WE, ‘Decisions of the Permanent Court of International Justice on Points of Law and Procedure of General Application’ (1930) 11 BYIL 1Google Scholar
Beckett, WE, ‘Les questions d’ intérêt général au point de vue juridique dans la jurisprudence de la Cour permanente de justice internationale’ (1932) 39 RdC 135Google Scholar
Beckett, WE, ‘Les questions d’ intérêt général au point de vue juridique dans la jurisprudence de la Cour permanente de justice internationale (juillet 1932 – juillet 1934)’ (1934) 50 RdC 193Google Scholar
Benacerraf, P, ‘Tasks, Super-Tasks, and the Modern Eleatics’ (1962) 59 JPhil 765Google Scholar
Bernhardt, R, ‘Evolutive Treaty Interpretation, Especially of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1999) 42 GYIL 11Google Scholar
Bernstein, S, ‘Legitimacy in a Global Environmental Governance’ (2005) 1 JILIR 139Google Scholar
Besson, S, ‘State Consent and Disagreement in International Law-Making: Dissolving the Paradox’ (2016) 29 LJIL 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley-Taylor, DR and Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The Evolution and Modernisation of Treaty Regimes’ (2018) 20 ICLR 403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnie, PW, ‘Small Cetaceans and the International Whaling Commission’ (1997) 10/1 GeoIntlEnvtlLRev 1Google Scholar
Black, M, ‘Achilles and the Tortoise’ (1951) 11/5 Analysis 91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blix, H, ‘The Requirement of Ratification’ (2000) 30 BYIL 352Google Scholar
Bodansky, D, ‘The Legal Character of the Paris Agreement’ (2016) 25 RECIEL 142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, D, ‘The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law?’ (1999) 93 AJIL 596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolintineanu, A, ‘Expression of Consent to Be Bound by a Treaty in the Light of the 1969 Vienna Convention’ (1974) 68 AJIL 672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonafé, BL and Palchetti, P, ‘Subsequent Practice in Treaty Interpretation between Article 31 and Article 32 of the Vienna Convention’ (2018) 46 QuestInt’lL 1Google Scholar
Bothe, M, ‘Legal and Non-Legal Norms – A Meaningful Distinction in International Relations?’ (1980) 11 NYIL 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowett, DW, ‘Reservations to Non-Restricted Multilateral Treaties’ (1976–7) 48 BYIL 67Google Scholar
Bowman, MJ, ‘The Multilateral Treaty Amendment Process – A Case Study’ (1995) 44/3 ICLQ 540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, AE, ‘Saving the World? Implementation and Enforcement of International Environmental Law through International Institutions’ (1991) 3 JEL229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brierly, JL, ‘Some Considerations on the Obsolescence of Treaties’ (1926) II Transactions of the Grotius Society 4Google Scholar
Brölmann, C et al, ‘Exiting International Organisations: A Brief Introduction’ (2018) 15/2 IOLR 243Google Scholar
Brölmann, C, ‘Law-Making Treaties: Form and Function in International Law’ (2005) 74 NJIL 383Google Scholar
Brunnée, J, ‘COPing with Consent: Law-Making under Multilateral Environmental Agreements’ (2002) 15 LJIL 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, J, ‘The Kyoto Protocol: Testing Ground for Compliance Theories?’ (2003) 63 ZaöRV 255Google Scholar
Brunnée, J and Toope, S, ‘International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an Interactional Theory of International Law’ (2000) 19 ColumJTransnat’lL 19Google Scholar
Buffard, I and Zemanek, K, ‘The “Object and Purpose” of a Treaty: An Enigma?’ (1998) 3/1 ARIEL 311Google Scholar
Burke, MB, ‘Dion and Theon: An Essentialist Solution to an Ancient Puzzle’ (1994) 91 JPhilos 129Google Scholar
Busutill, JJ, ‘The Bonn Declaration on International Terrorism: A Non-Binding Agreement on Aircraft Hijacking’ (1992) 31 ICLQ 474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cançado Trindade, AA, ‘The Time Factor in the Application of the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Law’ (1978) 61 RivDirInternaz 232Google Scholar
Capotorti, F, ‘L’extinction et la suspension des traités’ (1971/III) 134 RdC 134Google Scholar
Carter, WR, ‘Dion’s Left Foot (and the Price of Burkean Economy)’ (1997) 57 Philos&PhenomenolRes 371Google Scholar
Castellarin, E, ‘La sentence partielle du 30 juin 2016 dans l’ affaire du différend territorial et maritime entre la Croatie et la Slovénie’ (2016) 52 AFDI 129Google Scholar
Churchill, RR and Ulfstein, G, ‘Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little-Noticed Phenomenon in International Law’ (2000) 94 AJIL 623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coing, H, ‘Trois formes historiques du droit: glossateurs, pandectistes, école de l’exégèse’ (1970) 48 RHD 531, 540Google Scholar
Coope, U, ‘Why Does Aristotle Say That There Is No Time without Change?’ (2001) 101 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P, ‘Brexit: A Drama in Six Acts’ (2016) 40 ELR 447Google Scholar
Crawford, J and Olleson, S, ‘The Exception of Non-Performance: Links between the Law of Treaties and the State Responsibility’ (2000) 21 AYBIL 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crivellaro, J, ‘How did Anzilotti’s Jurisprudential Conception Influence the Jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice?’ (Jura Gentium, 2011) <www.juragentium.org/topics/thil/en/crivella.htm>>Google Scholar
d’Amato, A, ‘Treaties as a Source of General Rules of International Law’ (1962) 3 Harvard International Law Club Bulletin 1Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J, ‘The Idea of “Rules” in the Sources of International Law’ (2013) 84 BYIL 103Google Scholar
Danilenko, GM, ‘International Jus Cogens: Issues of Law-Making’ (1991) 2 EJIL 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P, ‘Non-Compliance: A Pivotal or Secondary Function of COP Governance?’ (2013) 15/1 ICLR 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Aréchaga, EJ, ‘International Law in the Past Third of a Century’ (1978/I) 159 RdC 1Google Scholar
de Wet, JC, ‘Die Sogenaamde “Exceptio Non Adimpleti Contractus” in die Praktyk van Vandaag’ (1945) 9/4 THRR 239Google Scholar
Deutsch, H, ‘Relative Identity’ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 17 August 2018) <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-relative/>>Google Scholar
Dock, MC, ‘Le retrait des membres des organisations internationales de la famille des Nations Unies’ (1994) 40 AFDI 106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, P-M, ‘Droit des traités, codification et responsabilité internationale’ (1997) 43 AFDI 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, RW, ‘Reservations to Treaties’ (1989) 10 MichJInt’lL 362Google Scholar
Eeckhout, P and Frantziou, E, ‘Brexit and Article 50 TEU: A Constitutionalist Reading’ (2017) 54/3 CMLR 695Google Scholar
Eisemann, PM, ‘Le gentlemen’s agreement comme source du droit international’ (1979) 106 JDI 326Google Scholar
Elias, TO, ‘The Doctrine of Intertemporal Law’ (1980) 74 AJIL 285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauchald, OK, ‘The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals – An Empirical Analysis (2008) 19 EJIL 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreirós, J, ‘“What Fermented in Me for Years”: Cantor’s Discovery of Transfinite Numbers’ (1995) 22 HistMath 33Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Do Treaties Need Ratification?’ (1934) 15 BYIL 113Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, 1951–4: General Principles and Sources of Law’ (1953) 30 BYIL 1Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, 1951–4: Treaty Interpretation and Other Treaty Points’ (1957) 33 BYIL 203Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Consent to Be Bound – Anything New under the Sun?’ (2005) 74 NJIL 483Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Dynamic (Evolutive) Interpretation of Treaties – Part I’ (2008) 21 HYIL 101Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Dynamic (Evolutive) Interpretation of treaties – Part II’ (2009) 22 HYIL 3Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Subsequent Agreement and Subsequent Practice: Some Reflections on the International Law Commission’s Draft Conclusions’ (2020) 22 ICLR 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The Identification and Character of Treaties and Treaty Obligations between States in International Law’ (2002) 73/1 BYIL 141Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The Tale of Two Judges: Sir Hersch Lauterpacht and Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice – Human Rights and the Interpretation of Treaties’ (2008) 61 RHDI 125Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M and Merkouris, P, ‘Re-Shaping Treaties while Balancing Interests of Stability and Change: Trends in the Amendment/Modification/Revision of Treaties’ (2015) 20/1 ARIEL 41Google Scholar
Fontanelli, F, ‘The Invocation of the Exception of Non-Performance: A Case-Study on the Role and Application of General Principles of International Law of Contractual Origin’ (2012) 1 CJICL 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forlati, S, ‘Reactions to Non-Performance of Treaties in International Law’ (2012) 25/3 LJIL 759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, P, ‘The Identity of Indiscernibles’ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 15 August 2010) <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-indiscernible/>>Google Scholar
French, D, ‘Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules’ (2006) 55 ICLQ 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaja, G, ‘Positivism and Dualism in Dionisio Anzilotti’ (1992) 3 EJIL 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaja, G, ‘Primary and Secondary Rules in the International Law of State Responsibility’ (2014) 97 RivDirInternaz 981Google Scholar
Gallois, A, ‘Identity over Time’ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 6 October 2016) <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-time/>>Google Scholar
Georgopoulos, Th, ‘Le droit intertemporel et les dispositions conventionelles évolutives – quelle thérapie contre la vieillesse des traits?’ (2004) 108/1 RGDIP 123Google Scholar
Gillespie, A, ‘Iceland’s Reservation at the International Whaling Commission’ (2003) 14 EJIL 977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraud, E, ‘Modification et terminaison des traités collectifs’ (1961) 49/1 AIDI 5Google Scholar
Goldstein, L, ‘Four Alleged Paradoxes in Legal Reasoning’ (1979) 38/2 CLJ 373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, C, ‘Acta Sunt Servanda? A Regime for Regulating Unilateral Acts of States at International Law’ (2006) 25 AYBIL 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, R, ‘Human Rights Treaties, Invalid Reservations, and State Consent’ (2002) 96 AJIL 531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gormley, LW, ‘Brexit – Nevermind the Whys and Wherefores: Fog in the Channel, Continent Cut Off’ (2017) 40 FordhamInt’lLJ 1175Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, A, ‘The Distinction between Interpretation and Application of Norms in International Adjudication’ (2011) 2/1 JIDS 31Google Scholar
Greig, DW, ‘Reciprocity, Proportionality, and the Law of Treaties’ (1994) 34 VJIL 295Google Scholar
Gross, L, ‘The Dispute between Greece and Turkey Concerning the Continental Shelf in the Aegean’ (1977) 71 AJIL 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruchalla-Wesierski, T, ‘A Framework for Understanding Soft Law’ (1984) 30 McGill LJ 37Google Scholar
Guzman, AT, ‘The Consent Problem in International Law’, Berkeley Programme in International Law and Economics, Working Paper Series (2011) <https://escholarship.org/content/qt04x8x174/qt04x8x174.pdf>>Google Scholar
Guzman, AT and Meyer, TLO, ‘International Soft Law’ (2010) 2 JLA 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwiazda, J, ‘A Proof of the Impossibility of Completing Infinitely Many Tasks’ (2012) 93 PacPhilosQ 1Google Scholar
Hafner, G, ‘L’ “obsolescence” de certaines dispositions du traité autrichien de 1955’ (1991) 37 AFDI 239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner, G, ‘Modification of Treaties by Subsequent Practice – Some Comments on the Austrian Position’ (2015) 20 ARIEL 175Google Scholar
Hamamoto, Y, ‘Possible Limitations to the Role of Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice – Viewed from Some State Practices’ (2020) 22/1 ICLR 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraszti, G, ‘Treaties and the Fundamental Change of Circumstances’ (1975/III) 146 RdC 1Google Scholar
Hartz, GA and Cover, JA, ‘Space and Time in the Leibnizian Metaphysic’ (1988) 22 Noûs 493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, K, ‘Temporal Parts’ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 5 October 2015) <http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/temporal-parts/>>Google Scholar
Helfer, LR, ‘Nonconsensual International Lawmaking’ (2008) 1 UIllLRev 71Google Scholar
Helfer, RL, ‘Exiting Treaties’ (2005) 91 VaLRev 1579Google Scholar
Helgesen, JE, ‘What Are the Limits to the Evolutive Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights?’ (2011) 31 HRLJ 275Google Scholar
Helmersen, ST, ‘Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: Legality, Semantics and Distinctions’ (2013) 6 EurJLegStud 127Google Scholar
Henkin, L, ‘International Law: Politics, Values, and Functions’ (1989) 216 RdC 9Google Scholar
Higgins, R, ‘Time and the Law: International Perspectives on an Old Problem’ (1997) 46 ICLQ 501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillgenberg, H, ‘A Fresh Look at Soft Law’ (1999) 10 EJIL 499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillion, C, ‘Le retrait de l’Union européenne: Analyse juridique’ (2016) RTDE 719Google Scholar
Hillion, C, ‘Withdrawal under Article 50 TEU: An Integration-Friendly Process’ (2018) 55/2 CMLR 29Google Scholar
Holmes, OW, ‘The Path of the Law’ 10 HLR 457Google Scholar
Huggett, N, ‘Zeno’s Paradoxes’ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 15 October 2010) <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paradox-zeno/#Arr>>Google Scholar
Huggett, N and Hoefer, C, ‘Absolute and Relational Theories of Space and Motion’ (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 22 January 2015) <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacetime-theories/>>Google Scholar
Hyde, CC, ‘Concerning the Interpretation of Treaties’ (1909) 3 AJIL 46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, CC, ‘Interpretation of Treaties by the Permanent Court of International Justice’ (1930) 24 AJIL 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irving, R, ‘The United Kingdom Referendum – June 1975’ (1976) 1 ELR 3Google Scholar
Jennings, RY, ‘What Is International Law and How Do We Tell It When We See It?’ (1981) 37 ASDI 59Google Scholar
Kearney, RD and Dalton, RE, ‘The Treaty on Treaties’ (1970) 64 AJIL 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, A, ‘Les actes unilatéraux dans la pratique française du droit international’ (1961) 65 RGDIP 317Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, ‘Accepting the Unacceptable? A New Nordic Approach to Reservations to Multilateral Treaties’ (2000) 69 NJIL 179Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, ‘The Redundancy of Soft Law’ (1996) 65 NJIL 167Google Scholar
Koester, V, ‘The Ramsar Convention: Which Parties Are Effectively Parties to What? (and Other Legal Issues)’ (2014) 44/1–2 EP&L 100Google Scholar
Kolb, R, ‘La désuétude en droit international public’ (2007) 111/3 RGDIP 577Google Scholar
Kolbasov, JJ, ‘Pravovyje Mery Okhrany Morija ot Zagrazhenia s Sushi’ (Legal Measures for the Protection of the Sea Land-Based Pollution), Paper presented at the International Conference on Ecology and Law in the Baltic Sea Region: Sources and Development, held in Riga, 1990 (unpublished, on file with the authors)Google Scholar
König, D, ‘Tacit Consent / Opting Out Procedure’ (2013) MPEPIL 1478Google Scholar
Kotzur, M, ‘Intertemporal Law’ [2008] MPEPIL 1433Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness of Treaties’ (1949) 26 BYIL 73Google Scholar
Lawrence, P and Wong, D, ‘Soft Law in the Paris Climate Agreement: Strength or Weakness?’ (2017) 26 RECIEL 276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Floch, G, ‘La désuétude en droit international public’ (2007) 111/3 RGDIP 609Google Scholar
Lefeber, R, ‘Creative Legal Engineering’ (2000) 13 LJIL 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letsas, G, ‘Strasbourg’s Interpretive Ethic: Lessons for the International Lawyer’ (2010) 21 EJIL 509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z, ‘International Intertemporal Law’ (2018) 48/2 CalWInt’lLJ 342Google Scholar
Linderfalk, U, ‘The Application of International Legal Norms over Time: The Second Branch of Intertemporal Law’ (2011) 58/2 NILR 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, U, ‘The Creation of Jus Cogens: Making Sense of Article 53 of the Vienna Convention’ (2011) 71 ZaöRV 359Google Scholar
Linderfalk, U, ‘Doing the Right Thing for the Right Reason – Why Dynamic or Static Approaches Should Be Taken in the Interpretation of Treaties’ (2008) 10 ICLR 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, U, ‘The Effect of Jus Cogens Norms: Whoever Opened Pandora’s Box, Did You Ever Think about the Consequences?’ (2007) 18 EJIL 853Google Scholar
Lipson, C, ‘Why Are Some International Agreements Informal?’ (1991) 45 International Organisation 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissitzyn, OJ, ‘Treaties and Changed Circumstances (Rebus Sic Stantibus)’ (1967) 61 AJIL 895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lysen, G, ‘The Joint Declaration by the EEC and the CMEA’ (1989) 14 NCJInt’lL & ComReg 369Google Scholar
Magliveras, DK, ‘The Withdrawal from the League of Nations Revisited’ (1991) 10 Penn State International Law Review 25Google Scholar
Malkin, HW, ‘Reservations to Multilateral Conventions’ (1926) 7 BYIL 141Google Scholar
Marks, S, ‘Treaties, State Responsibility and Remedies’ (1990) 49/3 CLJ 387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall-Smith, KL, ‘Reservations and the Determinative Function of the Human Rights Treaty Bodies’ (2012) 54 GYIL 521Google Scholar
McCall-Smith, KL, ‘Severing Reservations’ (2014) 63 ICLQ 599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGibbon, I, ‘Estoppel in International Law’ (1958) 7 ICLQ 468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, C, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54/2 ICLQ 279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNair, AD, ‘L’ application et l’ interprétation des traités d’ aprés la jurisprudence britannique’ (1933) 43 RdC 247Google Scholar
Meek, MR, ‘International Law: Reservations to Multilateral Agreements’ (1955) 5 DePaul LR 40Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘Interpreting the Customary Rules on Interpretation’ (2017) 19 ICLR 126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘(Inter)temporal Considerations in the Interpretative Process of the VCLT: Do Treaties Endure, Perdure or Exdure?’ (2014) 45 NYIL 121Google Scholar
Milanovic, M and Sicilianos, L-A, ‘Reservations to Treaties: An Introduction’ (2011) 24 EJIL 1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moloo, R, ‘When Actions Speak Louder Than Words: The Relevance of Subsequent Party Conduct to Treaty Interpretation’ (2013) 31/1 BerkJIntlL 39Google Scholar
Müllerson, R, ‘The ABM Treaty: Changed Circumstances, Extraordinary Events, Supreme Interests and International Law’ (2005) 59 ICLQ 509Google Scholar
Münch, F, ‘Comments on the 1968 Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1969) 29 ZaöRV 1Google Scholar
Myers, DP, ‘The Names and Scope of Treaties’ (1957) 51 AJIL 574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nahlik, S, ‘La Conference de Vienne sur le droit des traités: une vue d’ensemble’ (1969) 15 AFDI 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, Y, ‘Defining Boundaries of Legally Binding Treaties – A Study of Different State Practice in Treaty-Making’ (2018) 20 ICLR 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Treaties and Their Practice – Symptoms of Their Rise or Decline’ (2018) 392 RdC 205Google Scholar
Norton, JD, ‘A Quantum Mechanical Supertask’ (1999) 29/8 FoundPhys 1265Google Scholar
Oberthür, S, ‘Ozone Layer Protection at the Turn of the Century: The Eleventh Meeting of the Parties’ (2000) 30/1–2 EP&L 34Google Scholar
Oberthür, S and Lefeber, R, ‘Holding Countries to Account: The Kyoto Protocol’s Compliance System Revisited after Four Years of Experience’ (2010) 1 Climate L 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostendorf, P, ‘The Withdrawal Cannot Be Withdrawn: The Irrevocability of a Withdrawal Notification under Article 50(2) TEU’ (2017) 42/5 ELR 767Google Scholar
Paddeu, F, ‘A Genealogy of Force Majeure in International Law’ (2011) 82 BYIL 381Google Scholar
Papageorgiou, I, ‘The (Ir-)revocability of the Withdrawal Notification under Article 50 TEU’ Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, European Parliament (March 2018) <www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2018/596820/IPOL_IDA(2018)596820_EN.pdf>>Google Scholar
Peters, JK, ‘Reservations to Multilateral Treaties: How International Legal Doctrine Reflects World Vision’ (1982-3) 23 HILJ 71Google Scholar
Plender, R, ‘The Role of Consent in the Termination of Treaties’ (1986) 57 BYIL 133Google Scholar
Pronto, AN, ‘The Effect of War on Law – What Happens to Their Treaties When States Go to War?’ (2013) 2 CJICL 227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadri, R, ‘Cours général de droit international public’ (1964/III) 113 RdC 237Google Scholar
Rajamani, L, ‘The 2015 Paris Agreement: Interplay between Hard, Soft and Non-Obligations’ (2016) 28 JEL 337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranganathan, S, ‘Between Philosophy and Anxiety? The Early International Law Commission, Treaty Conflict and the Project of International Law’ (2012) 83 BYIL 82Google Scholar
Rank, R, ‘Modern War and the Validity of Treaties: A Comparative Study’ (1953) 38 CLQ 321Google Scholar
Roessler, F, ‘Law, De Facto Agreements and Declarations of Principle in International Economic Relations’ (1978) 21 GYIL 27Google Scholar
Rogers, JM and Molzon, RE, ‘Some Lessons about the Law from Self-Referential Problems in Mathematics’ (1991–2) 90 MichLRev 992Google Scholar
Roucounas, E, ‘Engagements parallèles et contradictoires’ (1987/VI) 206 RdC 9Google Scholar
Roucounas, E, ‘The Users of International Law’ in Arsanjani, MH et al (eds), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W Michael Reisman (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff 2010) 217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, A, ‘The International Legal Effects of Unilateral Declarations’ (1977) 71 AJIL 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruda, JM, ‘Reservation to Treaties’ (1975) 146 RdC 95Google Scholar
Sari, A, ‘Reversing a Withdrawal Notification under Article 50 TEU: Can a Member State Change Its Mind’ (2017) 42/4 ELR 451Google Scholar
Saydé, A, ‘Defining the Concept of Abuse of Union Law’ (2014) 33/1 YEL 138Google Scholar
Scelle, G, ‘Règles générales du droit de la paix’ (1933/IV) 46 RdC 327Google Scholar
Schachter, O, ‘The Twilight Existence of Nonbinding International Agreements’ (1977) 71 AJIL 296Google Scholar
Schiller, AA, ‘Custom in Classical Roman Law’ (1937) 24 VaLRev 268Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G, ‘The Principles and Standards of International Economic Law’ (1966/I) 117 RdC 5Google Scholar
Schwelb, E, ‘Termination or Suspension of the Operation of a Treaty as a Consequence of Its Breach’ (1967) 7 IJIL 309Google Scholar
Setear, J, ‘An Iterative Perspective on Treaties: A Synthesis of International Relations Theory and International Law’ (1996) 37/1 HILJ 139Google Scholar
Shaw, M, ‘Case Concerning Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botswana/Namibia)’ (2000) 49 ICLQ 964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicilianos, L-A, ‘The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Dimension of the Relations of International Responsibility’ (2002) 13/5 EJIL 1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicilianos, L-A, ‘The Relationship between Reprisals and Denunciation or Suspension of a Treaty’ (1993) 4 EJIL 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, B, ‘Reflections on Article 60 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Its Background in General International Law’ (1970) 20 ZOffR 5Google Scholar
Simma, B, ‘Termination and Suspension of Treaties: Two Recent Austrian Cases’ (1978) 21 GYIL 74Google Scholar
Stern, B, ‘La succession d’ Etats’ (1996) 262 RdC 9Google Scholar
Sucharipa-Behrmann, L, ‘The Legal Effects of Reservations to Multilateral Treaties’ (1996) 1 ARIEL 67Google Scholar
Tamada, D, ‘The Japan–South Korea Claims Agreement: Identification of Subsequent Agreements and Practice’ (2020) 22/1 ICLR 107Google Scholar
Teubner, G, ‘“And God Laughed …”: Indeterminacy, Self-Reference and Paradox in Law’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirlway, H, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989: Part One’ (1989) 60 BYIL 1Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989: Part Two’ (1991) 62 BYIL 1Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989: Supplement 2006: Part Three’ (2006) 77 BYIL 1Google Scholar
Thomson, JF, ‘Tasks and Super-Tasks’ (1954) 15 Analysis 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thürer, D, ‘Soft Law’ (2009) MPEPIL 1469Google Scholar
Tietje, C, ‘The Changing Legal Structure of International Treaties as an Aspect of an Emerging Global Governance Architecture’ (1999) 42 GYIL 26Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C, ‘Obligations Arising for States without or against Their Will’ (1993/IV) 241 RdC 195Google Scholar
Treves, T, ‘The Expansion of International Law: General Course on Public International Law’ (2015) 398 RdC 9Google Scholar
Tridimas, T, ‘Article 50: An Endgame without an End?’ (2016) 27 KLJ 297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Mensbrugghe, Y, ‘Legal Status of International North Sea Conference Declarations’ (1990) 5 IJECL 15Google Scholar
Vidmar, J, ‘Unilateral Revocability in Wightman: Fixing Article 50 with Constitutional Tools’ (2019) 15/2 EuConst 359Google Scholar
Weil, P, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law’ (1983) 77 AJIL 413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellens, K and Borchardt, G, ‘Soft Law in the European Community Law’ (1989) 14 ELR 267Google Scholar
Wessel, RA, ‘Informal International Law-Making as a New Form of World Legislation’ (2011) 8 IOLR 253Google Scholar
Widdows, K, ‘The Unilateral Denunciation of Treaties Containing No Denunciation Clause’ (1982) 53 BYIL 83Google Scholar
Wiersema, A, ‘The New International Law-Makers? Conferences of the Parties to Multilateral Environmental Agreements’ (2009) 1 MichJInt’lL 231Google Scholar
Witenberg, JC, ‘Onus probandi devant les jurisdictions arbitrales’ (1951) 55 RGDIP 321Google Scholar
Xiouri, M, ‘Material Breach of a Treaty: Some Remarks on the Partial Award of 30 June 2016 in the Matter of an Arbitration between Croatia and Slovenia’ (2019) 8/1 CILJ 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiouri, M, ‘The Exceptio Non Adimpleti Contractus in Public International Law’ (2019) 21 ICLR 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasseen, MK, ‘L’ interprétation des traités d’après la Convention de Vienne sur le Droit des Traités’ (1976) 151 RdC 1Google Scholar
Gatti, M, ‘The Article 50 Procedure for Withdrawal from the EU: A Well-Designed Secession Clause’ (EU Studies Association, 6 May 2017) <,www.eustudies.org/conference/papers/download/43>>Google Scholar
Georgopoulos, A, ‘The (Ir)revocability of Article 50 TEU (C-621/18 Wightman): Iphigenia Must Reach the Altar’ (SSRN, 8 December 2018) <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3298401_code734328.pdf?abstractid=3298401&mirid=1>CrossRef>Google Scholar
Hathaway, OA, Saurabh Sanghvi, HN and Solow, S, ‘Tacit Amendments’ (Yale Law School, 15 November 2011) <https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/cglc/TacitAmendments.pdf>>Google Scholar
UNGA, ‘Statute of the International Law Commission’ (21 November 1947) UNGA Res 174 (II) (as amended by UNGA Res 485 (V) (12 December 1950), 984 (X) (3 December 1955), 985 (X) (3 December 1955) and 36/39 (18 November 1981))Google Scholar
UNGA, ‘Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment’ (15 December 1972) UN Doc A/RES/2994Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G, ‘Third Report on State Responsibility’ (19 July 1991) UN Doc A/CN.4/440 and Add.1, reproduced in [1991/II – Part One] YBILC 1Google Scholar
Brierly, JL, ‘First Report on the Law of Treaties’ (14 April 1950) UN Doc A/CN.4/23, reproduced in [1950/II] YBILC 222Google Scholar
Cedeño, VR, ‘Fourth Report on Unilateral Acts of States’ (30 May 2001) UN Doc A/CN.4/519, reproduced in [2001/II – Part One] YBILC 115Google Scholar
Cedeño, VR, ‘Third Report on Unilateral Acts of States’ (17 February 2000) UN Doc A/CN.4/505, reproduced in [2000/II – Part One] YBILC 247Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Second Report on State Responsibility’ UN Doc A/CN.4/498 and Add.1–4, reproduced in [1999/II – Part One] YBILC 3Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Third Report on State Responsibility’ (15 March, 15 June, 10 and 18 July, and 4 August 2000) UN Doc A/CN.4/507 and Add. 1–4Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Fourth Report on the Law of Treaties’ (17 March 1959) UN Doc A/CN.4/120, reproduced in [1959/II] YBILC 37Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Second Report on the Law of Treaties’ (15 March 1957) UN Doc A/CN.4/107, reproduced in [1957/II] YBILC 16Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties’ (18 March 1958) UN Doc A/CN.4/115, reproduced in [1958/II] YBILC 20Google Scholar
ILC ‘Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with Commentaries’ (4 May–19 July 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/191, reproduced in [1966/II] YBILC 187Google Scholar
ILC Study Group, ‘Annex A. Treaties over Time in Particular: Subsequent Agreement and Practice’, reproduced in [2008/II – Part Two] YBILC 152Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries’ (23 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2001) UN Doc A/56/10, reproduced in [2001/II – Part Two] YBILC 31Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Conclusions on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties, with Commentaries’ (30 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2018) UN Doc A/73/10, reproduced in [2018/II – Part Two] YBILC 11Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Guide to Practice on Reservations to Treaties, with Commentaries’ (26 April–3 June and 4 July–12 August 2011) UN Doc A/66/10/Add.1Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Guiding Principles Applicable to Unilateral Declarations of States Capable of Creating Legal Obligations, with Commentaries thereto’ [2006/II – Part Two] YBILC 161Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the Commission to the General Assembly on the Work of Its 49th Session’ [1997/II – Part Two] YBILC 1Google Scholar
ILC Study Group, ‘Report on Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, finalised by Martti Koskenniemi’ (13 April 2006) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission Covering the Work of Its 16th Session’ (11 May–24 July 1964) UN Doc A/5809Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 18th Session’ 4 May–19 July 1966) UN Doc A/6309/Rev.l, reproduced in [1966/II] YBILC 172Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 44th Session’ (4 May–24 July 1992) UN Doc A/47/10, reproduced in [1992/II – Part Two] YBILC 1Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 66th Session’ (5 May–6 June and 7 July–8 August 2014) UN Doc A/69/10Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 68th Session’ (2 May–10 June and 4 July–12 August 2016) UN Doc A/71/10Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties: Text of the Draft Conclusions adopted by the Drafting Committee on Second Reading’ (11 May 2018) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.907Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1585th Meeting’ (6 May 1980) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1585Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 691st Meeting’ (31 May 1963) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.691Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 693rd Meeting’ (5 July 1963) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.693Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 728th Meeting’ (21 May 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.728Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 729th Meeting’ (22 May 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.729Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 744th Meeting’ (12 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.744Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 745th Meeting’ (15 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.745Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 746th Meeting’ (16 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.746Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 747th Meeting’ (17 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.747Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 753rd Meeting’ (26 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.753Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 754th Meeting’ (29 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.754Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 764th Meeting’ (13 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.764Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 765th Meeting’ (14 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.765Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 766th Meeting’ (15 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.766Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 767th Meeting’ (16 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.767Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 769th Meeting’ (17 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.769Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 770th Meeting’ (20 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.770Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 831st Meeting’ (14 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.831Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 832nd Meeting’ (17 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.832Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 833rd Meeting’ (18 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.833Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 834th Meeting’ (19 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.834Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 845th Meeting’ (5 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.845Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 847th Meeting’ (9 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.847Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 848th Meeting’ (10 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.848Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 857th Meeting’ (24 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.857Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 859th Meeting’ (26 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.859Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 860th Meeting’ (27 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.860Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 866th Meeting’ (9 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.866Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 869th Meeting’ (14 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.869Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 870th Meeting’ (15 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.870Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 871st Meeting’ (16 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.871Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 872nd Meeting’ (17 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.872Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 873rd Meeting’ (20 July 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.873Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 875th Meeting’ (22 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.875Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 876th Meeting’ (23 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.876Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 883rd Meeting’ (4 July 1966) UN Doc A/ CN.4/SR.883Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 888th Meeting’ (12 July 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.888Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1858th Meeting’ (10 July 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1858Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1860th Meeting’ (12 July 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1860Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1867th Meeting’ (20 July 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1867Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, ‘Second Report on the Law of Treaties’ (8 June 1954) UN Doc A/CN.4/87 and Corr.1, reproduced in [1954/II] YBILC 123Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Fifth Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to Treaty Interpretation’ (28 February 2018) UN Doc A/CN.4/715Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘First Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to Treaty Interpretation’ (19 March 2013) UN Doc A/CN.4/660Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Fourth Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’ (7 March 2016) UN Doc A/CN.4/694Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Second Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’ (26 March 2014) UN Doc A/CN.4/671Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Third Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’ (7 April 2015) UN Doc A/CN.4/683Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Fifteenth Report on Reservations to Treaties’ (31 March, 26 May, and 31 May 2010) UN Doc A/CN.4/624 and Add.1-2Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Fifth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (4 April 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/380 and Corr.1, reproduced in [1984/II – Part One] YBILC 1Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Fourth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (14–15 April 1983) UN Doc A/CN.4/366 and Add.1 & Add.1/Corr.1, reproduced in [1983/II – Part One] YBILC 3Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Preliminary Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (1 April 1980) UN Doc A/CN.4/330, reproduced in [1980/II – Part One] YBILC 107Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Seventh Report on State Responsibility’ (4 March and 23 April 1986) UN Doc A/CN.4/397 and Corr.1 & 2 and Add.1 & Corr.1, reproduced in [1986/II – Part One] YBILC 1Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Sixth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (2 April 1985) UN Doc A/CN.4/389 and Corr.1 & Corr.2, reproduced in [1985/II – Part One] YBILC 3Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘First Report on the Law of Treaties’ (26 March 1962) UN Doc A/CN.4/144 and Add.1, reproduced in [1962/II] YBILC 28Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘Second Report on the Law of Treaties’ (20 March, 10 April, 30 April and 5 June 1963) UN Doc A/CN.4/156 and Add.1–3, reproduced in [1963/II] YBILC 36Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘Sixth Report on the Law of Treaties’ (11 March, 25 March, 12 April, 11 May, 17 May, 24 May, 1 June, and 14 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/186 and Add. 1–7, reproduced in [1966/II] YBILC 51Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties’ (3 March, 9 June, 12 June, and 7 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/167 and Add.1–3, reproduced in [1964/II] YBILC 5Google Scholar
Wood, M, ‘Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law’ (27 March 2015) UN Doc A/CN.4/682Google Scholar
Sixth Committee, ‘20th Session, Summary Record of the 843rd Meeting’ (7 October 1965) UN Doc A/C.6/20/SR.843Google Scholar
Sixth Committee, ‘20th Session, Summary Record of the 845th Meeting’ (11 October 1965) UN Doc A/C.6/SR.845Google Scholar
Sixth Committee, ‘20th Session, Summary Record of the 850th Meeting’ (13 October 1965) UN Doc A/C.6/SR.850Google Scholar
ILA, ‘Preliminary Report of the Study Group on the Content and Evolution of the Rules of Interpretation’ (ILA, 7–11 August 2016) <https://ila.vettoreweb.com/Storage/Download.aspx?DbStorageId=1401&StorageFileGuid=bcaa951e-ae3e-4ccb-9c80–248c98c741e3>>Google Scholar
ILA Committee on Formation of Customary (General) International Law, ‘Final Report of the Committee: Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law’ (ILA, 2000) <https://ila.vettoreweb.com/Storage/Download.aspx?DbStorageId=1107&StorageFileGuid=e6663317-c7ca-4fff-a6e8–1cc2423756bf>>Google Scholar
Australia, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 41’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.237Google Scholar
Colombia, Spain, and Venezuela, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 53’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.307, Add.1 and 2Google Scholar
France, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 41’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.46Google Scholar
Netherlands, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 40’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.232Google Scholar
UK, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 53’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.311Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 15th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (5 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.15 80Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 19th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (9 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.19 97Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 31st Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (19 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.31 164Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 33rd Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (22 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.33 177Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 37th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (24 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/11 203Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 38th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (25 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/11 210Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 58th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (8 May 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.58 334Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 62nd Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (9 May 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.62 361Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘2nd Session – 11th Plenary Meeting’ (30 April 1969) UN Doc A/CONF.39/SR.11 35Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘2nd Session – 86th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (11 April 1969) UN Doc A/CONF.39/11/Add.1 222Google Scholar
UNGA, ‘Statute of the International Law Commission’ (21 November 1947) UNGA Res 174 (II) (as amended by UNGA Res 485 (V) (12 December 1950), 984 (X) (3 December 1955), 985 (X) (3 December 1955) and 36/39 (18 November 1981))Google Scholar
UNGA, ‘Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment’ (15 December 1972) UN Doc A/RES/2994Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G, ‘Third Report on State Responsibility’ (19 July 1991) UN Doc A/CN.4/440 and Add.1, reproduced in [1991/II – Part One] YBILC 1Google Scholar
Brierly, JL, ‘First Report on the Law of Treaties’ (14 April 1950) UN Doc A/CN.4/23, reproduced in [1950/II] YBILC 222Google Scholar
Cedeño, VR, ‘Fourth Report on Unilateral Acts of States’ (30 May 2001) UN Doc A/CN.4/519, reproduced in [2001/II – Part One] YBILC 115Google Scholar
Cedeño, VR, ‘Third Report on Unilateral Acts of States’ (17 February 2000) UN Doc A/CN.4/505, reproduced in [2000/II – Part One] YBILC 247Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Second Report on State Responsibility’ UN Doc A/CN.4/498 and Add.1–4, reproduced in [1999/II – Part One] YBILC 3Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Third Report on State Responsibility’ (15 March, 15 June, 10 and 18 July, and 4 August 2000) UN Doc A/CN.4/507 and Add. 1–4Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Fourth Report on the Law of Treaties’ (17 March 1959) UN Doc A/CN.4/120, reproduced in [1959/II] YBILC 37Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Second Report on the Law of Treaties’ (15 March 1957) UN Doc A/CN.4/107, reproduced in [1957/II] YBILC 16Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties’ (18 March 1958) UN Doc A/CN.4/115, reproduced in [1958/II] YBILC 20Google Scholar
ILC ‘Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with Commentaries’ (4 May–19 July 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/191, reproduced in [1966/II] YBILC 187Google Scholar
ILC Study Group, ‘Annex A. Treaties over Time in Particular: Subsequent Agreement and Practice’, reproduced in [2008/II – Part Two] YBILC 152Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries’ (23 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2001) UN Doc A/56/10, reproduced in [2001/II – Part Two] YBILC 31Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Conclusions on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties, with Commentaries’ (30 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2018) UN Doc A/73/10, reproduced in [2018/II – Part Two] YBILC 11Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Guide to Practice on Reservations to Treaties, with Commentaries’ (26 April–3 June and 4 July–12 August 2011) UN Doc A/66/10/Add.1Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Guiding Principles Applicable to Unilateral Declarations of States Capable of Creating Legal Obligations, with Commentaries thereto’ [2006/II – Part Two] YBILC 161Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the Commission to the General Assembly on the Work of Its 49th Session’ [1997/II – Part Two] YBILC 1Google Scholar
ILC Study Group, ‘Report on Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, finalised by Martti Koskenniemi’ (13 April 2006) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission Covering the Work of Its 16th Session’ (11 May–24 July 1964) UN Doc A/5809Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 18th Session’ 4 May–19 July 1966) UN Doc A/6309/Rev.l, reproduced in [1966/II] YBILC 172Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 44th Session’ (4 May–24 July 1992) UN Doc A/47/10, reproduced in [1992/II – Part Two] YBILC 1Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 66th Session’ (5 May–6 June and 7 July–8 August 2014) UN Doc A/69/10Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 68th Session’ (2 May–10 June and 4 July–12 August 2016) UN Doc A/71/10Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties: Text of the Draft Conclusions adopted by the Drafting Committee on Second Reading’ (11 May 2018) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.907Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1585th Meeting’ (6 May 1980) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1585Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 691st Meeting’ (31 May 1963) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.691Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 693rd Meeting’ (5 July 1963) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.693Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 728th Meeting’ (21 May 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.728Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 729th Meeting’ (22 May 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.729Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 744th Meeting’ (12 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.744Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 745th Meeting’ (15 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.745Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 746th Meeting’ (16 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.746Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 747th Meeting’ (17 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.747Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 753rd Meeting’ (26 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.753Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 754th Meeting’ (29 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.754Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 764th Meeting’ (13 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.764Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 765th Meeting’ (14 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.765Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 766th Meeting’ (15 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.766Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 767th Meeting’ (16 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.767Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 769th Meeting’ (17 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.769Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 770th Meeting’ (20 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.770Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 831st Meeting’ (14 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.831Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 832nd Meeting’ (17 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.832Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 833rd Meeting’ (18 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.833Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 834th Meeting’ (19 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.834Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 845th Meeting’ (5 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.845Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 847th Meeting’ (9 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.847Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 848th Meeting’ (10 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.848Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 857th Meeting’ (24 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.857Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 859th Meeting’ (26 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.859Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 860th Meeting’ (27 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.860Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 866th Meeting’ (9 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.866Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 869th Meeting’ (14 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.869Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 870th Meeting’ (15 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.870Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 871st Meeting’ (16 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.871Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 872nd Meeting’ (17 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.872Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 873rd Meeting’ (20 July 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.873Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 875th Meeting’ (22 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.875Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 876th Meeting’ (23 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.876Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 883rd Meeting’ (4 July 1966) UN Doc A/ CN.4/SR.883Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 888th Meeting’ (12 July 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.888Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1858th Meeting’ (10 July 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1858Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1860th Meeting’ (12 July 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1860Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1867th Meeting’ (20 July 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1867Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, ‘Second Report on the Law of Treaties’ (8 June 1954) UN Doc A/CN.4/87 and Corr.1, reproduced in [1954/II] YBILC 123Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Fifth Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to Treaty Interpretation’ (28 February 2018) UN Doc A/CN.4/715Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘First Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to Treaty Interpretation’ (19 March 2013) UN Doc A/CN.4/660Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Fourth Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’ (7 March 2016) UN Doc A/CN.4/694Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Second Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’ (26 March 2014) UN Doc A/CN.4/671Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Third Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’ (7 April 2015) UN Doc A/CN.4/683Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Fifteenth Report on Reservations to Treaties’ (31 March, 26 May, and 31 May 2010) UN Doc A/CN.4/624 and Add.1-2Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Fifth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (4 April 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/380 and Corr.1, reproduced in [1984/II – Part One] YBILC 1Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Fourth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (14–15 April 1983) UN Doc A/CN.4/366 and Add.1 & Add.1/Corr.1, reproduced in [1983/II – Part One] YBILC 3Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Preliminary Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (1 April 1980) UN Doc A/CN.4/330, reproduced in [1980/II – Part One] YBILC 107Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Seventh Report on State Responsibility’ (4 March and 23 April 1986) UN Doc A/CN.4/397 and Corr.1 & 2 and Add.1 & Corr.1, reproduced in [1986/II – Part One] YBILC 1Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Sixth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (2 April 1985) UN Doc A/CN.4/389 and Corr.1 & Corr.2, reproduced in [1985/II – Part One] YBILC 3Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘First Report on the Law of Treaties’ (26 March 1962) UN Doc A/CN.4/144 and Add.1, reproduced in [1962/II] YBILC 28Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘Second Report on the Law of Treaties’ (20 March, 10 April, 30 April and 5 June 1963) UN Doc A/CN.4/156 and Add.1–3, reproduced in [1963/II] YBILC 36Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘Sixth Report on the Law of Treaties’ (11 March, 25 March, 12 April, 11 May, 17 May, 24 May, 1 June, and 14 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/186 and Add. 1–7, reproduced in [1966/II] YBILC 51Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties’ (3 March, 9 June, 12 June, and 7 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/167 and Add.1–3, reproduced in [1964/II] YBILC 5Google Scholar
Wood, M, ‘Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law’ (27 March 2015) UN Doc A/CN.4/682Google Scholar
Sixth Committee, ‘20th Session, Summary Record of the 843rd Meeting’ (7 October 1965) UN Doc A/C.6/20/SR.843Google Scholar
Sixth Committee, ‘20th Session, Summary Record of the 845th Meeting’ (11 October 1965) UN Doc A/C.6/SR.845Google Scholar
Sixth Committee, ‘20th Session, Summary Record of the 850th Meeting’ (13 October 1965) UN Doc A/C.6/SR.850Google Scholar
ILA, ‘Preliminary Report of the Study Group on the Content and Evolution of the Rules of Interpretation’ (ILA, 7–11 August 2016) <https://ila.vettoreweb.com/Storage/Download.aspx?DbStorageId=1401&StorageFileGuid=bcaa951e-ae3e-4ccb-9c80–248c98c741e3>>Google Scholar
ILA Committee on Formation of Customary (General) International Law, ‘Final Report of the Committee: Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law’ (ILA, 2000) <https://ila.vettoreweb.com/Storage/Download.aspx?DbStorageId=1107&StorageFileGuid=e6663317-c7ca-4fff-a6e8–1cc2423756bf>>Google Scholar
Australia, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 41’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.237Google Scholar
Colombia, Spain, and Venezuela, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 53’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.307, Add.1 and 2Google Scholar
France, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 41’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.46Google Scholar
Netherlands, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 40’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.232Google Scholar
UK, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 53’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.311Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 15th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (5 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.15 80Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 19th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (9 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.19 97Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 31st Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (19 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.31 164Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 33rd Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (22 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.33 177Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 37th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (24 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/11 203Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 38th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (25 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/11 210Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 58th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (8 May 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.58 334Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 62nd Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (9 May 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.62 361Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘2nd Session – 11th Plenary Meeting’ (30 April 1969) UN Doc A/CONF.39/SR.11 35Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘2nd Session – 86th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (11 April 1969) UN Doc A/CONF.39/11/Add.1 222Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘De l’interprétation des traités’(1950) 43/1 AIDI 336Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘De l’ interprétation des traités’ (1952) 44 AIDI 359Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘De l’interprétation des traités’(1956) 46 AIDI 359Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘Modifications et terminaison des traités collectifs’ (1961/I) 49 AIDI 229Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘Problems Arising from a Succession of Codification Conventions on a Particular Subject’ (1995/I) 66 AIDI 248Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘Resolution of 11 August 1975: The Intertemporal Problem in Public International Law’ (1975) 56 AIDI 536Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘Resolution: L’ interprétation des traités’ (IDI, 1956) <www.idi-iil.org/app/uploads/2017/06/1956_grena_02_fr.pdf>>Google Scholar
Virally, M, ‘Rapport définitif: La distinction entre textes internationaux ayant une portée juridique dans les relations mutuelles entre leur auteurs et les textes juridiques qui en sont dépourvus’ (1983) 60/I AIDI 328Google Scholar
Virally, M, ‘Rapport provisoire: La distinction entre textes internationaux ayant une portée juridique dans les relations mutuelles entre leur auteurs et les textes juridiques qui en sont dépourvus’ (1983) 60/I AIDI 166Google Scholar
ILO Committee on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards, ‘Possible Improvements in the Standard – Setting Activities of the ILO: The Role of Standards in the Achievement of the ILO’s Objectives’ (March 2000) GB.277/LILS/2 <www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/gb/docs/gb277/pdf/lils-2.pdf>>Google Scholar
Transnational Institute, ‘The UN Drug Control Conventions: A Primer’ (Transnational Institute, 24 October 2015) <www.tni.org/files/publication-downloads/primer_unconventions_24102015.pdf>>Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘The Report of the Legal Drafting Group on Possible Adjustments and Amendment of the Montreal Protocol’ (17 June 1999) UN Doc UNEP/OzL.Pro.11/3Google Scholar
World Tourism Organisation, ‘Report of the Secretary-General: Other Administrative and Statutory Matters – Status of Ratification of Amendments to the Statutes and of the 1947 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies’ (1 October 2018) UN Doc CE/109/3(d)iiiGoogle Scholar
1978 Bonn Summit Statement on Air-Hijacking (1978) 17 ILM 1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984 Declaration of the International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea (OSPAR, 1984) <www.ospar.org/site/assets/files/1239/1nsc-1984-bremen_declaration.pdf>>Google Scholar
1987 London Declaration, Second International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea (Vlaams Instituut Voor de Zee, 24–5 November 1987) <www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/140155.pdf>>Google Scholar
1988 Ministerial Declaration on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea (Helsinki Commission, 15 February 1988) <www.helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Ministerial%20declarations/MinDecl1988.pdf>>Google Scholar
1990 Baltic Sea Declaration (Helsinki Commission, 2–3 September 1990) www.helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Ministerial%20declarations/RonnebyDecl1990.pdf>>Google Scholar
1990 Ministerial Declaration of the Third International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea (University of Oregon, 8 March 1990) <https://iea.uoregon.edu/treaty-text/1990-thirdnorthseadeclarationentxt>>Google Scholar
1993 Declaration on Resource Mobilisation for the Baltic Sea Joint Comprehensive Environmental Action Programme (Helsinki Commission, 24–25 March 1993) www.helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Ministerial%20declarations/GdanskDecl1993.pdf>>Google Scholar
2001 Copenhagen Declaration on the Safety of Navigation and Emergency Capacity in the Baltic Sea Area (Helsinki Commission, 10 September 2001) <www.helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Ministerial%20declarations/Copenhagen2001.pdf>>Google Scholar
2003 Bremen Ministerial Declaration (Helsinki Commission, 25 June 2003) <www.helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Ministerial%20declarations/Bremen2003.pdf>>Google Scholar
2007 HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan (Helsinki Commission, 15 November 2007) <www.helcom.fi/Documents/Baltic%20sea%20action%20plan/BSAP_Final.pdf>>Google Scholar
2010 Moscow Ministerial Declaration (Helsinki Commission, 20 May 2010) <www.helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Ministerial%20declarations/HELCOM%20Moscow%20Ministerial%20Declaration%20FINAL.pdf>>Google Scholar
2012 Bremen Declaration Adopted at the North Sea Commission Annual Business Meeting 20 June 2012 (Eastern Norway Country Network, 20 June 2012) www.ostsam.no/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Bremen-Declaration.pdf>>Google Scholar
2013 Copenhagen Declaration Taking Further Action to Implement the Baltic Sea Action Plan – Reaching Good Environmental Status for a Healthy Baltic Sea (Helsinki Commission, 3 October 2013) <www.helcom.fi/Documents/Ministerial2013/Ministerial%20declaration/2013%20Copenhagen%20Ministerial%20Declaration%20w%20cover.pdf>>Google Scholar
CITES, ‘Resolution Conf 9.24 (Rev. CoP17)’ (CITES, 2019) <www.cites.org/sites/default/files/document/E-Res-09-24-R17.pdf>>Google Scholar
CMP1, ‘Decision 27/CMP.1: Procedures and Mechanisms Relating to Compliance under the Kyoto Protocol’ (9–10 December 2005) UN Doc FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.3Google Scholar
ECOSOC, ‘Activities of Other Organizations and Countries of Interest to the Working Party’ (22 December 2008) UN Doc ECE/TRANS/WP.30/2009/1Google Scholar
European Council, ‘United Kingdom Notification under Article 50 TEU: Letter of 29 March 2017 from the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom to the President of the European Council’ (29 March 2017) XT 20001/17 <http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/XT-20001-2017-INIT/en/pdf>>Google Scholar
France, ‘Observations by France on General Comment 24’ (1997) 4 IHRR 6Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 1: Convention on Treaties’(1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1205Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 2: David Dudley Field’s Draft Code’(1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1207Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 3: Bluntschli’s Draft Code’(1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1208Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 4: Fiore’s Draft Code’ (1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1212Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 5: Draft of the International Commission of American Jurists’ (1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1222Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 7: The Interpretation of Treaties’ (1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1225Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1935) 29 AJIL Supp 657Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, ‘General Comment on Issues Relating to Reservations Made upon Ratification or Accession to the Covenant or the Optional Protocols Thereto, or in Relation to Declarations under Article 41 of the Covenant’ (4 November 1994) UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.6Google Scholar
ITU, ‘Resolution No 62: Basic Instruments of the Union’ (1982) 1531 UNTS 493Google Scholar
Security Consultative Committee, ‘Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee – A Stronger Alliance for a Dynamic Security Environment: The New Guidelines for Japan–US Defence Cooperation’ (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 27 April 2015) www.mofa.go.jp/files/000078186.pdf>>Google Scholar
UK, ‘Observations by the United Kingdom on General Comment 24’ (1996) 3 IHRR 261Google Scholar
UNCED, ‘Rio Declaration on Environment and Development’ (1992) 31 ILM 874Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘Decision III/1: Amendment to the Basel Convention’ (28 November 1995) UN Doc UNEP/CHW.3/35Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘Report of the 2nd Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer’ (29 June 1990) UN Doc UNEP/OZL.Pro.2/3, Decision II/2Google Scholar
UNFCCC, ‘Proposal from Saudi Arabia to Amend the Kyoto Protocol’ (26 May 2005) UN Doc FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/2Google Scholar
UNFCCC, ‘Questions of Implementation’ (UNFCC, 2019) <http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/compliance/questions_of_implementation/items/5451.php>>Google Scholar
US, ‘Observations by the United States on General Comment 24’ (1996) 3 IHRR 265Google Scholar
ILO Committee on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards, ‘Possible Improvements in the Standard – Setting Activities of the ILO: The Role of Standards in the Achievement of the ILO’s Objectives’ (March 2000) GB.277/LILS/2 <www.ilo.org/public/english/standards/relm/gb/docs/gb277/pdf/lils-2.pdf>>Google Scholar
Transnational Institute, ‘The UN Drug Control Conventions: A Primer’ (Transnational Institute, 24 October 2015) <www.tni.org/files/publication-downloads/primer_unconventions_24102015.pdf>>Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘The Report of the Legal Drafting Group on Possible Adjustments and Amendment of the Montreal Protocol’ (17 June 1999) UN Doc UNEP/OzL.Pro.11/3Google Scholar
World Tourism Organisation, ‘Report of the Secretary-General: Other Administrative and Statutory Matters – Status of Ratification of Amendments to the Statutes and of the 1947 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies’ (1 October 2018) UN Doc CE/109/3(d)iiiGoogle Scholar
1978 Bonn Summit Statement on Air-Hijacking (1978) 17 ILM 1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1984 Declaration of the International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea (OSPAR, 1984) <www.ospar.org/site/assets/files/1239/1nsc-1984-bremen_declaration.pdf>>Google Scholar
1987 London Declaration, Second International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea (Vlaams Instituut Voor de Zee, 24–5 November 1987) <www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/140155.pdf>>Google Scholar
1988 Ministerial Declaration on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea (Helsinki Commission, 15 February 1988) <www.helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Ministerial%20declarations/MinDecl1988.pdf>>Google Scholar
1990 Baltic Sea Declaration (Helsinki Commission, 2–3 September 1990) www.helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Ministerial%20declarations/RonnebyDecl1990.pdf>>Google Scholar
1990 Ministerial Declaration of the Third International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea (University of Oregon, 8 March 1990) <https://iea.uoregon.edu/treaty-text/1990-thirdnorthseadeclarationentxt>>Google Scholar
1993 Declaration on Resource Mobilisation for the Baltic Sea Joint Comprehensive Environmental Action Programme (Helsinki Commission, 24–25 March 1993) www.helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Ministerial%20declarations/GdanskDecl1993.pdf>>Google Scholar
2001 Copenhagen Declaration on the Safety of Navigation and Emergency Capacity in the Baltic Sea Area (Helsinki Commission, 10 September 2001) <www.helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Ministerial%20declarations/Copenhagen2001.pdf>>Google Scholar
2003 Bremen Ministerial Declaration (Helsinki Commission, 25 June 2003) <www.helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Ministerial%20declarations/Bremen2003.pdf>>Google Scholar
2007 HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan (Helsinki Commission, 15 November 2007) <www.helcom.fi/Documents/Baltic%20sea%20action%20plan/BSAP_Final.pdf>>Google Scholar
2010 Moscow Ministerial Declaration (Helsinki Commission, 20 May 2010) <www.helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Ministerial%20declarations/HELCOM%20Moscow%20Ministerial%20Declaration%20FINAL.pdf>>Google Scholar
2012 Bremen Declaration Adopted at the North Sea Commission Annual Business Meeting 20 June 2012 (Eastern Norway Country Network, 20 June 2012) www.ostsam.no/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Bremen-Declaration.pdf>>Google Scholar
2013 Copenhagen Declaration Taking Further Action to Implement the Baltic Sea Action Plan – Reaching Good Environmental Status for a Healthy Baltic Sea (Helsinki Commission, 3 October 2013) <www.helcom.fi/Documents/Ministerial2013/Ministerial%20declaration/2013%20Copenhagen%20Ministerial%20Declaration%20w%20cover.pdf>>Google Scholar
CITES, ‘Resolution Conf 9.24 (Rev. CoP17)’ (CITES, 2019) <www.cites.org/sites/default/files/document/E-Res-09-24-R17.pdf>>Google Scholar
CMP1, ‘Decision 27/CMP.1: Procedures and Mechanisms Relating to Compliance under the Kyoto Protocol’ (9–10 December 2005) UN Doc FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.3Google Scholar
ECOSOC, ‘Activities of Other Organizations and Countries of Interest to the Working Party’ (22 December 2008) UN Doc ECE/TRANS/WP.30/2009/1Google Scholar
European Council, ‘United Kingdom Notification under Article 50 TEU: Letter of 29 March 2017 from the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom to the President of the European Council’ (29 March 2017) XT 20001/17 <http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/XT-20001-2017-INIT/en/pdf>>Google Scholar
France, ‘Observations by France on General Comment 24’ (1997) 4 IHRR 6Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 1: Convention on Treaties’(1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1205Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 2: David Dudley Field’s Draft Code’(1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1207Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 3: Bluntschli’s Draft Code’(1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1208Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 4: Fiore’s Draft Code’ (1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1212Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 5: Draft of the International Commission of American Jurists’ (1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1222Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 7: The Interpretation of Treaties’ (1935) 29 AJIL Supp 1225Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1935) 29 AJIL Supp 657Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, ‘General Comment on Issues Relating to Reservations Made upon Ratification or Accession to the Covenant or the Optional Protocols Thereto, or in Relation to Declarations under Article 41 of the Covenant’ (4 November 1994) UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.6Google Scholar
ITU, ‘Resolution No 62: Basic Instruments of the Union’ (1982) 1531 UNTS 493Google Scholar
Security Consultative Committee, ‘Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee – A Stronger Alliance for a Dynamic Security Environment: The New Guidelines for Japan–US Defence Cooperation’ (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 27 April 2015) www.mofa.go.jp/files/000078186.pdf>>Google Scholar
UK, ‘Observations by the United Kingdom on General Comment 24’ (1996) 3 IHRR 261Google Scholar
UNCED, ‘Rio Declaration on Environment and Development’ (1992) 31 ILM 874Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘Decision III/1: Amendment to the Basel Convention’ (28 November 1995) UN Doc UNEP/CHW.3/35Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘Report of the 2nd Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer’ (29 June 1990) UN Doc UNEP/OZL.Pro.2/3, Decision II/2Google Scholar
UNFCCC, ‘Proposal from Saudi Arabia to Amend the Kyoto Protocol’ (26 May 2005) UN Doc FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/2Google Scholar
UNFCCC, ‘Questions of Implementation’ (UNFCC, 2019) <http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/compliance/questions_of_implementation/items/5451.php>>Google Scholar
US, ‘Observations by the United States on General Comment 24’ (1996) 3 IHRR 265Google Scholar
‘Motion’ (Oxford Dictionaries, 2018) <https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/motion>>Google Scholar
‘Move’ (Oxford Dictionaries, 2018) <https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/move>>Google Scholar
Brière, C, ‘The Advocate-General Opinion in Wightman: Article 50 Notification to Withdraw from the European Union Is Unilaterally Revocable’ (European Law Blog, 6 December 2018) <http://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/12/06/the-advocate-general-opinion-in-wightman-article-50-notification-to-withdraw-from-the-european-union-is-unilaterally-revocable/>>Google Scholar
Çali, B, ‘Qatar’s Reservations to the ICCPR: Anything New under the VCLT Sun?’ (EJIL: Talk!, 19 September 2019) <www.ejiltalk.org/qatars-reservations-to-the-iccpr-anything-new-under-the-vclt-sun/>>Google Scholar
Camenzuli, LK, ‘The Development of International Environmental Law at the Multilateral Environmental Agreements: Conference of the Parties and Its Validity’ <http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/cel10_camenzuli.pdf>>Google Scholar
Cameron, D, ‘EU Speech at Bloomberg: Prime Minister David Cameron Discussed the Future of the European Union at Bloomberg’ (UK Government, 23 January 2013) www.gov.uk/government/speeches/eu-speech-at-bloomberg>>Google Scholar
Closa Montero, C, ‘Is Article 50 Reversible? On Politics beyond Legal Doctrine’ (Verfassungsblog, 4 January 2017) <https://verfassungsblog.de/is-article-50-reversible-on-politics-beyond-legal-doctrine/>>Google Scholar
Edward, D et al, ‘In the Matter of Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union (“The Three Knights’ Opinion”)’ (Bindmans, 10 February 2017) <www.bindmans.com/uploads/files/documents/Final_Article_50_Opinion_10.2.17.pdf>>Google Scholar
Falk, R, ‘“Voluntary” International Law and the Paris Agreement’ (Richard Falk Wordpress, 16 January 2016) <https://richardfalk.wordpress.com/2016/01/16/voluntary-international-law-and-the-paris-agreement/>>Google Scholar
Garner, O, ‘Can the United Kingdom Unilaterally Revoke Its Article 50 Notification to Withdraw from the EU? Wightman v Secretary of State for DexEU [2018] CSIH 62’ (European Law Blog, 24 September 2018) <http://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/09/24/can-the-united-kingdom-unilaterally-revoke-its-article-50-notification-to-withdraw-from-the-eu-wightman-v-secretary-of-state-for-dexeu-2018-csih-62/>>Google Scholar
Garner, O, ‘Case C-621/18, Wightman v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union: The European Court of Justice Confirms That Article 50 Notification Can Be Unilaterally Revoked’ (European Law Blog, 11 December 2018) <http://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/12/11/case-c-621-18-wightman-v-secretary-of-state-for-exiting-the-european-union-the-european-court-of-justice-confirms-that-article-50-notification-can-be-unilaterally-revoked/>>Google Scholar
IMO, ‘Introduction’ (IMO, 2019) <www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/Home.aspx>>Google Scholar
Jay, A and Lynn, J, ‘Yes Minister Series, Episode Six: The Writing on the Wall: Transcript of Episode’ (Yes Minister, 24 March 1980) <www.yes-minister.com/ymseas1b.htm>>Google Scholar
McCrea, R, ‘Brexit II? The Legal Issues of Revoking the Notification to Leave the EU but Then Notifying to Leave Again’ (EU Law Analysis Blog, 16 December 2018) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2018/12/brexit-ii-legal-issues-of-revoking.html>>Google Scholar
StPeers, , ‘Brexit: You Can U-turn If You Want To. The CJEU Judgment in Wightman’ (EU Law Analysis Blog, 10 December 2018) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2018/12/brexit-you-can-u-turn-if-you-want-to.html>>Google Scholar
Peers, S, ‘Can an Article 50 Notice of Withdrawal from the EU Be Unilaterally Revoked?: The Case for Unilateral Revocability of the Article 50 Notice’ (EU Law Analysis Blog, 16 January 2018) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2018/01/can-article-50-notice-of-withdrawal.html>>Google Scholar
Peers, S, ‘Revoking the Notice to Withdraw from the EU? The Opinion in Wightman’ (EU Law Analysis Blog, 4 December 2018) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2018/12/revoking-notice-to-withdraw-from-eu.html>>Google Scholar
Perakis, M, ‘Does the Principle of the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order Allow for a Member State to Revoke the Notification of Its Withdrawal from the EU?’ (European Law Blog, 31 October 2018) <http://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/10/31/does-the-principle-of-the-autonomy-of-the-eu-legal-order-allow-for-a-member-state-to-revoke-the-notification-of-its-withdrawal-from-the-eu/>>Google Scholar
Reid, AS, ‘Scotching Brexit? Background to the Wightman Case about Reversing the Article 50 Notification Unilaterally’ (EU Law Analysis Blog, 16 November 2018) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2018/11/scotching-brexit-background-to-wightman.html>>Google Scholar
Sarmiento, D, ‘Miller, Brexit and the (Maybe Not So Evil) Court of Justice’ (Verfassungsblog, 8 November 2016) <http://verfassungsblog.de/miller-brexit-and-the-maybe-not-to-so-evil-court-of-justice/>>Google Scholar
Sarvarian, A, ‘Arbitration between Croatia and Slovenia: Leaks, Wiretaps, Scandal (Part 4)’ (EJIL: Talk!, 3 May 2016) <www.ejiltalk.org/arbitration-between-croatia-andslovenia-leaks-wiretaps-scandal-part-4/>>Google Scholar
Slaughter, A-M, ‘The Paris to Global Governance’ (Project Syndicate, 28 December 2015) <www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/paris-agreement-model-for-global-governance-by-anne-marie-slaughter-2015-12?barrier=accessreg>>Google Scholar
Tladi, D, ‘Is the International Law Commission Elevating Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice?’ (EJIL: Talk!, 30 August 2018) www.ejiltalk.org/is-the-international-law-commission-elevating-subsequent-agreements-and-subsequent-practice/>>Google Scholar
Chr, Voigt, ‘On the Paris Agreement’s Imminent Entry into Force (Part II of II)’ (EJIL: Talk!, 12 October 2016) <www.ejiltalk.org/on-the-paris-agreements-imminent-entering-into-force-what-are-the-consequences-of-the-paris-agreements-entering-into-force-part-ii/>>Google Scholar
Weatherill, S, ‘Can an Article 50 Notice of Withdrawal from the EU Be Unilaterally Revoked?: Why the Withdrawal Notification under Article 50 TEU Is Not Unilaterally Revocable’ (EU Law Analysis Blog, 16 January 2018) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2018/01/can-article-50-notice-of-withdrawal.html>>Google Scholar
Weiler, J, ‘A Second Brexit Referendum – What Makes You Think They Will Have You Back?’ (EJIL: Talk!, 26 November 2018) <www.ejiltalk.org/a-second-brexit-referendum-what-makes-you-think-they-will-have-you-back/#more-16684>>Google Scholar