We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Abi-Saab, Get al (eds), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (Bloomsbury2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ago, R, ‘Die Internationalen Organisationen und Ihre Funktionen im inneren Tätigkeitsgebiet der Staaten’ in Wehberg, H, Schätzel, W, and Schlochauer, H-J (eds), Rechtsfragen der internationalen Organisation: Festschrift für Hans Wehberg zu seinem 70 Geburtstag (Vittorio Klostermann1956) 20Google Scholar
Azaria, D, Treaties on Transit of Energy via Pipelines and Countermeasures (OUP2005)Google Scholar
Baetens, F, ‘Ejusdem Generis and Noscitur a Sociis’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 133Google Scholar
Balashov, Y, ‘Persistence’ in Callender, E (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time (OUP2011) 14Google Scholar
Berman, F and Bentley, D, ‘Treaties and Other International Instruments – I General Definition, Treaty Formalities’ in Roberts, I (ed), Satow’s Diplomatic Practice (7th edn, OUP2017) 599Google Scholar
Berman, F and Bentley, D, ‘Treaties and Other International Instruments – II Most Common Forms: Treaty/Convention/Agreement/Protocol’ in Roberts, I (ed), Satow’s Diplomatic Practice (7th edn, OUP2017) 608Google Scholar
Berman, F and Bentley, D, ‘Treaties and Other International Instruments – III Pact, Act, Modus Vivendi, Declaration, Exchange of Notes, Memorandum of Understanding’ in Roberts, I (ed), Satow’s Diplomatic Practice (7th edn, OUP2017) 616Google Scholar
Berman, F and Bentley, D, ‘Treaties and Other International Instruments – IV Ratification, Accession, Acceptance and Approval, Treaty Succession’ in Roberts, I (ed), Satow’s Diplomatic Practice (7th edn, OUP2017) 638Google Scholar
Bilder, R, ‘Beyond Compliance: Helping Nations Cooperate’ in Shelton, D (ed), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System (OUP2003) 65Google Scholar
Birnie, P, ‘Legal Techniques of Settling Disputes: The Soft Settlement Approach’ in Butler, WE (ed), Perestroika and International Law (Martinus Nijhoff1990) 175Google Scholar
Birnie, P, International Regulation of Whaling: From Conservation of Whaling to Conservation of Whales and Regulation of Whale-Watching (Oceana Publications1985) 549Google Scholar
Birnie, P, ‘The Status of Environmental “Soft Law”: Trends and Examples with Special Focus on IMO Norms’, in Ringbom, H (ed), Competing Norms in the Law of Marine Environmental Protection, Focus on Ship Safety and Pollution Prevention (Kluwer Law International1997) 39Google Scholar
Blix, H, Treaty-Making Power (Stevens & Sons1960)Google Scholar
Blokker, NM, ‘Constituent Instruments: Creating a Genie That May Escape from the Bottle?’ in Cogan, JK, Hurd, I, and Johnstone, I (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations (OUP2013) 943Google Scholar
Bodeau-Livinec, P and Morgan-Foster, J, ‘Article 61’ in Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP2011) 1382Google Scholar
Bos, M, A Methodology of International Law (North-Holland1984)Google Scholar
Bowett, DW, ‘Treaties and State Responsibility’ in Bardonnet, Det al (eds), Mélanges Virally (Pedone1991) 137Google Scholar
Boyle, A, ‘Some Reflections on Relationship of Treaties and Soft Law’ in Gowlland-Debbas, V (ed), Multilateral Treaty–Making: Current Status of Challenges to and Reforms Needed in International Legislative Process (Springer2000) 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braumann, C and Reinisch, A, ‘Effet Utile’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 47Google Scholar
Brierly, JL, The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace (Clarendon Press1928)Google Scholar
Brölmann, C, ‘Limits of the Treaty Paradigm’ in Fitzmaurice, M and Craven, M (eds), Interrogating the Treaty: Essays in the Contemporary Law of Treaties (Wolf Legal Publishers2005) 29Google Scholar
Brölmann, C, ‘Specialized Rules of Treaty Interpretation: International Organizations’ in Hollis, DB (ed) The Oxford Guide to Treaties (OUP2012) 507Google Scholar
Brölmann, C, ‘Typologies and the “Essential Juridical Character” of Treaties’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP2018) 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, J, ‘Reweaving the Fabric of International Law? Patterns of Consent in the Environmental Framework Agreements’ in Wolfrum, R and Röben, V (eds), Developments of International Law in Treaty-Making (Springer2005) 101Google Scholar
Brunner, C, Force Majeure and Hardship under General Contract Principles: Exemption for Non-performance in International Arbitration (Kluwer Law International2009)Google Scholar
Buga, I, ‘Subsequent Practice and Treaty Modification’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP2018) 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buga, I, The Modification of Treaties by Subsequent Practice (OUP2018)Google Scholar
Camps, M, ‘Britain and the European Community 1955–1963’ in Mayne, R (ed), The Recovery of Europe (Weidenfeld & Nicholson1970)Google Scholar
Cantor, G, Contributions to the Founding of the Theory of Transfinite Numbers (Jourdain, P tr, Dover Publications1915)Google Scholar
Capitant, H, De la cause des obligations (contrats, engagements unilatéraux, legs) (Dalloz1927)Google Scholar
Chanaki, A, L’ adaptation des traités dans les temps (Bruylant2013)Google Scholar
Chinkin, C, ‘Human Rights’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP2018) 509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinkin, C, ‘Normative Development in International Legal System’ in Shelton, D (ed), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System (OUP2000) 21Google Scholar
Christakis, T, ‘Article 56’ in Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP2011) 1251Google Scholar
Cohen, MG, ‘Desuetude and Obsolescence of Treaties’ in Cannizzaro, E (ed), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (OUP2011) 350Google Scholar
Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe and BIICL (eds), Treaty-Making: Expression of Consent to Be Bound by a Treaty (Kluwer Law International2001)Google Scholar
Crema, L, ‘Subsequent Agreements Practice and Subsequent Practice within and outside the Vienna Convention’ in Nolte, G (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP2013) 17Google Scholar
d’Argent, P, ‘Contra Proferentem’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 241Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J, ‘The Multi-dimensional Process of Interpretation: Content-Determination and Law Ascertainment Distinguished’ in Bianchi, A, Peat, D, and Windsor, M (eds), Interpretation in International Law (OUP2015) 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahm, G, Delbrück, J, and Wolfrum, R, Völkerrecht Band I/3 (2nd edn, de Gruyter2002)Google Scholar
de Vattel, E, The Law of Nations or Principles on the Law of Nature Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (GGJ and J Robinson1793)Google Scholar
de Visscher, C, Problémes d’ interprétation judiciaire en droit international public (Pedone1963)Google Scholar
Descartes, R, Principles of Philosophy (Miller, RP and Miller, VR tr, Kluwer1983)Google Scholar
Djeffal, C, Static and Evolutive Treaty Interpretation: A Functional Reconstruction (CUP2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, P-M, ‘Evolutionary Interpretation of Treaties: Between Memory and Prophecy’ in Cannizzaro, (ed) The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (OUP2011) 123Google Scholar
Dupuy, R-J, ‘Declaratory Law and Programmatory Law: From Revolutionary Custom to “Soft Law”’ in Akkerman, RJ, van Krieken, PJ and Pannenborg, Ch (eds), Declarations on Principles: A Quest for Universal Peace (Sijthoff1979) 252Google Scholar
Earman, J and Norton, JD, ‘Infinite Pains: The Trouble with Supertasks’ in Morton, A and Stich, S (eds), Paul Benacerraf: The Philosopher and His Critics (Blackwell1996) 231Google Scholar
Eddington, A, The Nature of the Physical World (CUP1928)Google Scholar
Einstein, Aet al, The Principle of Relativity (Perrett, W and Jeffery, GB tr, Dover Books1952)Google Scholar
Elias, O and Lim, CL, The Paradox of Consensualism in International Law (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff1998)Google Scholar
Elias, TO, The Modern Law of Treaties (Oceana1974)Google Scholar
Emerson, RW, ‘Nature’ in Slater, J, Ferguson, AR and Carr, JF (eds), Collected Works of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Vol III: Essays (Beknap Press1983) 105Google Scholar
Engelen, FA, Interpretation of Tax Treaties under International Law: A Study of Articles 31, 32, and 33 of Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Their Application to Tax Treaties (International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation2004)Google Scholar
Fenwick, CG, International Law (The American Law Book Co1924)Google Scholar
Feynman, R, The Meaning of It All: Thoughts of a Citizen–Scientist (Helix Books1998)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Angst of the Exceptio Inadimplenti Non Est Adimplendum in International Law’ in Bartels, L and Paddeu, F (eds), Exceptions in International Law (OUP2020)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Exceptional Circumstances and Treaty Commitments’ in Hollis, D (ed), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (OUP2012) 605Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The Practical Working of the Law of Treaties’ in Evans, MD (ed), International Law (5th edn, CUP2019) 138Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The Whaling Convention and Thorny Issues of Interpretation’ in Fitzmaurice, M and Tamada, D (eds), Whaling in the Antarctic: Significance and Implications of the ICJ Judgment (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff2016) 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M and Costelloe, DG, ‘Lawmaking by Treaty: Conclusion of Treaties and Evolution of Treaty Regimes in Practice’ in Brölmann, C and Radi, Y (eds), Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Lawmaking (Edward Elgar2016) 111Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M and Elias, O, Contemporary Issues in the Law of Treaties (Eleven International Publishing2005)Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M and Merkouris, P, ‘Uniformity versus Specialization (1): The Quest for a Uniform Law of Inter-State Treaties’ in Tams, C, Tzanakopoulos, A, and Zimmermann, A (eds), Research Handbook on the Law of Treaties (Edward Elgar2014) 341Google Scholar
Foreign Office, Handbook of Commercial Treaties etc, With Foreign Powers (4th edn, HM Stationery Office1931)Google Scholar
Fox, H, ‘Article 31(3)(a) and (b) of the Vienna Convention and the Kasikili/Sedudu Island Case’ in Fitzmaurice, M, Elias, O, and Merkouris, P (eds), The Issues of Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers2010) 59Google Scholar
Franck, T, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (OUP1995)Google Scholar
Friedrich, J, International Environmental “Soft Law”: The Functions and Limits of Nonbinding Instruments in International Environmental Law and Governance (Springer2014)Google Scholar
Gaja, G, ‘Unruly Treaty Reservations’ in Ago, R (ed), Droit international à l'heure de sa codification: études en l'honneur de Roberto Ago, Vol 1 (Giuffrè1987) 307Google Scholar
Gardiner, R, ‘Characteristics of the Vienna Convention Rules on Treaty Interpretation’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP2018) 335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geny, F, Méthode d’ interprétation et sources en droit privé positif: Essai critique, Vol I (LGDJ1954)Google Scholar
Giegerich, T, ‘Article 56’ in Dӧrr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer2018) 1039Google Scholar
Giegerich, T, ‘Article 60’ in Dӧrr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer2018) 1095Google Scholar
Giegerich, T, ‘Article 62’ in Dӧrr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer2018) 1143Google Scholar
Goehring, T, ‘Treaty-Making and Treaty Evolution’ in Bodansky, D, Brunnée, J and Hey, E (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (OUP2008) 467Google Scholar
Goellner, A, Pre-caducité, caducité et désuétude en matiere de droit international public (essai juridique) (Rousseau1939)Google Scholar
Gomaa, MM, Suspension or Termination of Treaties on Grounds of Breach (Martinus Nijhoff1996)Google Scholar
Gourgourinis, A, Equity and Equitable Principles in the World Trade Organization: Addressing Conflicts and Overlaps between the WTO and Other Regimes (Routledge2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig, D, Intertemporality and the Law of Treaties (BIICL2001)Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A, ‘Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes of Motion’ in Samon, WC (ed), Zeno’s Paradoxes (Bobbs-Merrill1970) 200Google Scholar
Hafner, G, ‘The Drawbacks and Lacunae of the VCLT’ in Hafner, Get al (eds), Völkerrecht und die Dynamik der Menschenrechte: Liber Amicorum Wolfram Karl (2012) 421Google Scholar
Handl, G, ‘International “Lawmaking” by Conferences of the Parties and Other Politically Mandated Bodies: Comment’ in Wolfrum, R and Röben, V (eds), Development of International Law in Treaty-Making (Springer2005) 127Google Scholar
Hart, HLA, Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Clarendon Press1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, S, ‘Persistence through Time’ in Loux, MJ and Zimmerman, DW (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics (OUP2005) 315Google Scholar
Henin, PF, ‘In Pari Materia Interpretation in Treaty Law’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 211Google Scholar
Hershey, AS, The Essentials of International Public Law and Organization (rev edn, MacMillan1927)Google Scholar
Higgins, R, Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (OUP1994)Google Scholar
Higgins, R, ‘Some Observations on the Inter-temporal Rule in International Law’ in Makarczyk, J (ed), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21st Century (Kluwer Law International1996) 173Google Scholar
Hinton, CH, ‘What Is the Fourth Dimension?’ in Hinton, CH (ed), Scientific Romances No 1 (W Swan Schonneschein1884) 1Google Scholar
Hobbes, T, Elements of Philosophy – The First Section, Concerning Body (R and W Leybourn1656)Google Scholar
Horwich, P, Asymmetries in Time (MIT Press1987)Google Scholar
Hoyt, EC, The Unanimity Rule in the Revision of Treaties: A Re-Examination (Martinus Nijhoff1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, MO, The Permanent Court of International Justice: A Treatise (The MacMillan Co1934) 551Google Scholar
Jennings, RY and Watts, AD (eds), Oppenheim's International Law (9th edn, Longman1996)Google Scholar
Jennings, RY and Watts, AD (eds), Oppenheim’s International Law (9th edn, OUP2008)Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, J, Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (Routledge2011)Google Scholar
Kapteyn, PJG, van Themaat, PV, Introduction to the Law of the European Communities: From Maastricht to Amsterdam (Gormley, LW ed, 3rd edn, Kluwer Law International1998)Google Scholar
Kassoti, E, The Juridical Nature of Unilateral Acts of States in International Law (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J, The Concept of Treaty in International Law (Kluwer Law International1996)Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, ‘Reluctant “Grundnormen”: Articles 31(3)(c) and 42 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and the Fragmentation of International Law’ in Craven, M, Fitzmaurice, M, and Vogiatzi, M (eds), Time, History and International Law (Martinus Nijhoff2007) 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, PD, ‘Contemporary Responses to Agrippa’s Trilemma’ in Greco, J (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism (OUP2008) 484Google Scholar
Klingler, J, ‘Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Altrerius’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 73Google Scholar
Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018)Google Scholar
Kohen, M, ‘Keeping Subsequent Agreements and Practice in Their Right Limits’ in Nolte, G (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP2013) 34Google Scholar
Kolb, R, Good Faith in International Law (Hart2017)Google Scholar
Kolb, R, Interprétation et création du droit international: esquisses d'une herméneutique juridique moderne pour le droit international public (Bruylant2006)Google Scholar
Kontou, N, The Termination of Treaties in Light of New Customary International Law (Clarendon Press1994)Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (CUP1989)Google Scholar
Krieger, H, ‘Article 68’ in Dӧrr, O and Schmalenbach, K (eds), Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary (2nd edn, Springer2018) 1259Google Scholar
Kritsiotis, D, ‘The Object and Purpose of a Treaty’s Object and Purpose’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP2018) 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, TJ, Principles of International Law (7th edn, MacMillan1923)Google Scholar
Leca, J, Les techniques de révision des conventions internationales (LGDJ1961)Google Scholar
Leibniz, GW, The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence: With Extracts from Newton's ‘Principia’ and ‘Optiks’ (edited with introduction and notes by Alexander, HG, MUP1977)Google Scholar
Letsas, G, A Theory of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (OUP2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, C, Treaty Interpretation under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A New Round for Codification (Springer2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lost-Sieminska, D, ‘The International Maritime Organization’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP2018) 907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, V, ‘Sustainable Development and Unsustainable Arguments’ in Boyle, A and Freestone, D (eds), International Law and Sustainable Development: Past Achievements and Future Challenges (OUP1999) 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, A, ‘Ex Abundante Cautela’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 115Google Scholar
Madison, J, ‘Federalist Paper No 43’ in Rossiter, Cl (ed), The Federalist Papers (New American Library1961) 278Google Scholar
Matsushita, Met al (eds), The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (3rd edn, OUP2015)Google Scholar
McNair, A, The Law of Treaties (Clarendon Press1961)Google Scholar
McNair, AD and Watts, AD, The Legal Effects of War (4th edn, CUP1966)Google Scholar
McWhinney, E, ‘The Time Dimension in International Law, Historical Relativism and Intertemporal Law’ in Makarczyk, J (ed), Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Manfred Lachs (Martinus Nijhoff1984) 179Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, Article 31(3)(c) VCLT and the Principle of Systemic Integration: Normative Shadows in Plato’s Cave (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘In Dubio Mitius’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 259Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘“Third Party” Considerations and “Corrective Interpretation” in the Interpretative Use of Travaux Préparatoires − Is It Fahrenheit 451 for Preparatory Work?’ in Fitzmaurice, M, Elias, O, and Merkouris, P (eds), Treaty Interpretation and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: 30 Years On (Martinus Nijhoff2010) 75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkowski, H, ‘Space and Time’ as reprinted and translated in Einstein, A and Davis, FA (eds), The Principle of Relativity (Dover Publications1952) 73Google Scholar
Minon, A, ‘Per Argumentum a Fortiori’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 197Google Scholar
Mitchell, AD and Voon, T, ‘The Rule of Necessary Implication’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 331Google Scholar
Moeckli, D and White, ND, ‘Treaties as “Living Instruments”’ in Bowman, MJ and Kritsiotis, D (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP2018) 136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, JB, A Digest of International Law (Government Printing Office1906)Google Scholar
Murphy, S, ‘The Relevance of Subsequent Agreement and Subsequent Practice in Interpretation of Treaties’ in Nolte, G (ed), Treaties and Subsequent Practice (OUP2013) 82Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (CUP2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peat, D, Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals (CUP2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Article 19 of the 1969 Vienna Convention’ in Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP2011) 405Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Article 38’ in Zimmermann, Aet al (eds), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (2nd edn, OUP2012) 731Google Scholar
Pellet, A and Müller, D, ‘Reservations to Human Rights Treaties: Not an Absolute Evil …’ in Fastenrath, U (ed), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Judge Bruno Simma (OUP2011) 521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellet, A and Müller, D, ‘Reservations to Treaties: An Objection to a Reservation Is Definitely Not an Acceptance’ in Cannizzaro, E (ed), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (OUP2011) 37Google Scholar
Pergantis, V, The Paradigm of State Consent in the Law of Treaties (Edward Elgar2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulkowski, D, ‘Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generali/Generalia Specialibus Non Derogant’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 161Google Scholar
Quoc Dinh, N, Pellet, A, and Daillier, P, Droit International Public (7th edn, LGDJ2002)Google Scholar
Ress, G, ‘The Interpretation of the Charter’ in Simma, B (ed), The Charter of the United Nations: a Commentary (2nd edn, OUP2002) 13Google Scholar
Reuter, P, Introduction to the Law of Treaties (Mico, J and Haggenmacher, P tr, 2nd edn, Routledge1995)Google Scholar
Rosenne, S, Breach of Treaty (Grotius1985)Google Scholar
Rosenne, S, Developments in the Law of Treaties 1945–1986 (CUP1989)Google Scholar
Rosenne, S, The Time Factor in the Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (Sythoff1960)Google Scholar
Roucounas, E, A Landscape of Contemporary Theories of International Law (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, C, Principes généraux du droit international public: Tome 1 (Pedone1944)Google Scholar
Russell, B, The History of Western Philosophy (Simon & Schuster1967)Google Scholar
Sadat-Akhavi, SA, Methods of Resolving Conflicts between Treaties (Brill2003)Google Scholar
Saganek, P, Unilateral Acts of States in Public International Law (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff2015)Google Scholar
Sands, P and Klein, P, Bowett’s Law of International Institutions (6th edn, Sweet & Maxwell2009)Google Scholar
Sato, T, Evolving Constitutions of International Organizations: A Critical Analysis of the Interpretative Framework of the Constituent Instruments of International Organizations (Kluwer Law International1996)Google Scholar
Schermers, HG and Blokker, NM, International Institutional Law: Unity with Diversity (5th rev edn, Martinus Nijhoff2011)Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G, A Manual of International Law (3rd edn, Stevens1952)Google Scholar
Schwebel, St, ‘May Preparatory Work Be Used to Correct Rather Than Confirm the “Clear” Meaning of a Treaty Provision?’ in Makarczyk, J and Skubiszewski, K (eds), Theory of International Law at the Threshold of the 21st Century (Kluwer Law International1996) 541Google Scholar
Seidl-Hohenveldern, I, International Economic Law (Springer1989)Google Scholar
Shaw, MN and Fournet, C, ‘Article 62’ in Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP2011) 1411Google Scholar
Shelton, D, ‘Introduction: Law, Non-Law and the Problems of “Soft Law”’ in Shelton, D (ed), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System (OUP2000) 1Google Scholar
Sicilianos, L-A, Les réactions décentralisées à l’ illicite: des contre-mesures à la légitime défense (LGDJ1990)Google Scholar
Simma, B and Tams, C, ‘Article 60’ in Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP2011) 1351Google Scholar
Simma, B and Hernández, G, ‘Legal Consequences of an Impermissible Reservation to a Human Rights Treaty: Where Do We Stand?’ in Cannizzaro, E (ed), The Law of Treaties Beyond the Vienna Convention (OUP2011) 60Google Scholar
Simplicius, , On Aristotle’s Physics (Bloomsbury1997)Google Scholar
Sinclair, I, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (2nd edn, MUP1984)Google Scholar
Skubiszewski, K, ‘A New Source of the Law of Nations Resolutions of International Organisations’ in Guggenheim, P and Battelli, M (eds), Recueil d’études de droit international en hommage à Paul Guggenheim (Imprimerie de la Tribune de Genève1968) 508Google Scholar
Skubiszewski, K, Uchwaly Prawotworcze Organizacji Miendzynarodowych. Przeglad Zagadnien I Analiza Wstepna (Law-Making Resolutions of International Organisations. Survey of Problems and the Preliminary Analysis) (Praca Wydana z Zasiłku Polskiej Akademii Nauk1965)Google Scholar
Solomou, A, ‘Exceptions to a Rule Must Be Narrowly Construed’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 359Google Scholar
Sorensen, R, A Brief History of the Paradox: Philosophy and the Labyrinths of the Mind (OUP2003)Google Scholar
Sur, S, L’ interprétation en droit international public (LGDJ1974)Google Scholar
Surbiguet, MF and Vagogne, P, Liste des traites et accords de la France en vigueur au 1er octobre 1988 (Ministère des Affaires étrangères1988)Google Scholar
Szasz, PC, ‘International Norm-Making’ in Brown Weiss, E (ed), Environmental Change and International Law: New Challenges and Dimensions (UN University Press1992) 41Google Scholar
Sztucki, J, ‘Reflections on International “Soft Law”’ in Ramberg, J, Bring, O, and Mahmoudi, S (eds), Festschrift till Lars Hjerner: Studies in International Law (Norstedts1990) 549Google Scholar
Tammes, AJP, ‘Soft Law’ in Arbor, ER (ed), Essays on International and Comparative Law in Honour of Judge Erades (Martinus Nijhoff1983) 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tams, C, ‘Regulating Treaty Breaches’ in Bowman, and Kritsiotis, (eds), Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (CUP2018) 440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavernier, P, Recherches sur l’ application dans le temps des actes et des règles en droit international public: problèmes de droit intertemporel ou de droit transitoire (LGDJ1979)Google Scholar
Taylor, H, A Treatise on Public International Law (Callaghan1901)Google Scholar
Thirlway, H, ‘The Sources of International Law’ in Evans, M (ed), International Law (4th edn, OUP2014) 95Google Scholar
Tunkin, GI, Theory of International Law (WE Butler tr, Harvard University Press1974)Google Scholar
Tzanakopoulos, A, ‘Article 68 in 56’ in Corten, O and Klein, P (eds), The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (OUP2011) 1564Google Scholar
Tzeng, P, ‘The Principles of Contemporaneous and Evolutionary Interpretation’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 387Google Scholar
Ulfstein, G, ‘Treaty Bodies and Regimes’ in Hollis, DB (ed), The Oxford Guide to Treaties (OUP2012) 428Google Scholar
Ulfstein, G and Werksman, J, ‘The Kyoto Compliance System: Towards Hard Enforcement’ in Stokke, OS, Hovi, J, and Ulfstein, G (eds), Implementing the Climate Regime: International Compliance (Earthscan2005) 39Google Scholar
United Nations, Final Clauses of Multilateral Treaties: Handbook (United Nations2003)Google Scholar
Vamvoukos, A, Termination of Treaties in International Law: The Doctrines of Rebus sic Stantibus and Desuetude (Clarendon Press1985)Google Scholar
van Hoof, GJH, Rethinking the Sources of International Law (Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers1983)Google Scholar
Villiger, ME, Commentary on the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Brill2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virally, M, ‘The Sources of International Law’ in Sorensen, M (ed), Manual of Public International Law (Macmillan1968) 1564Google Scholar
Westlake, J, International Law (2nd edn, Sn1910)Google Scholar
Whitehead, AN, Essays in Science and Philosophy (Philosophical Library1947)Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R, ‘Legitimacy and International Law from a Legal Perspective: Some Introductory Considerations’ in Wolfrum, R and Röben, V (eds), Legitimacy in International Law (Springer2008) 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyatt, J, Intertemporal Linguistics in International Law: Beyond Contemporaneous and Evolutionary Treaty Interpretation (Hart Publishing2019)Google Scholar
Yotova, R, ‘Compliance with Domestic Law: An Implied Condition in Treaties Conferring Rights and Protections on Foreign Nationals and Their Property?’ in Klingler, J, Parkhomenko, Y, and Salonidis, C (eds), Between the Lines of the Vienna Convention?: Canons and Other Principles of Interpretation in Public International Law (Wolters Kluwer2018) 307Google Scholar
Abi-Saab, G, ‘General Course of Public International Law’ (1987/VII) 207RdC15Google Scholar
Ackermann, T and Fenrich, K, ‘Motion and Rest: International Law’s Responsiveness towards Terrorism, Mass Surveillance, and Self-Defence’ (2017) 77ZaöRV745Google Scholar
Agius, M, ‘The Invocation of Necessity in International Law’ (2009) 56/2NILR95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrus, M and Wessel, R, ‘Between Pragmatism and Predictability: Temporariness in International Law’ (2014) 45NYIL3Google Scholar
Arato, J, ‘’Subsequent Practice and Evolutive Interpretation’ (2010) 9/3Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aust, A, ‘The Theory and Practice of Informal International Instruments’ (1986) 35ICLQ787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bantekas, I, ‘Uniformity in Model Laws as Subsequent Practice under Article 31 of Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (2015) 20ARIEL145Google Scholar
Baratta, R, ‘Should Invalid Reservations to Human Rights Treaties Be Disregarded?’ (2000) 11EJIL413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basaran, I, ‘The Evolution of the International Maritime Organization’s Role in Shipping’ (2016) 47/1JMarL&Com101Google Scholar
Bassiouni, Ch, ‘Functional Approach to “General Principles of International Law”’ (1989–90) 11MichJInt’lL768Google Scholar
Baxter, RR, ‘International Law in Her Infinite Variety’ (1980) 29ICLQ549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, WE, ‘Decisions of the Permanent Court of International Justice on Points of Law and Procedure of General Application’ (1930) 11BYIL1Google Scholar
Beckett, WE, ‘Les questions d’ intérêt général au point de vue juridique dans la jurisprudence de la Cour permanente de justice internationale’ (1932) 39RdC135Google Scholar
Beckett, WE, ‘Les questions d’ intérêt général au point de vue juridique dans la jurisprudence de la Cour permanente de justice internationale (juillet 1932 – juillet 1934)’ (1934) 50RdC193Google Scholar
Benacerraf, P, ‘Tasks, Super-Tasks, and the Modern Eleatics’ (1962) 59JPhil765Google Scholar
Bernhardt, R, ‘Evolutive Treaty Interpretation, Especially of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1999) 42GYIL11Google Scholar
Bernstein, S, ‘Legitimacy in a Global Environmental Governance’ (2005) 1JILIR139Google Scholar
Besson, S, ‘State Consent and Disagreement in International Law-Making: Dissolving the Paradox’ (2016) 29LJIL289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley-Taylor, DR and Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The Evolution and Modernisation of Treaty Regimes’ (2018) 20ICLR403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnie, PW, ‘Small Cetaceans and the International Whaling Commission’ (1997) 10/1GeoIntlEnvtlLRev1Google Scholar
Blix, H, ‘The Requirement of Ratification’ (2000) 30BYIL352Google Scholar
Bodansky, D, ‘The Legal Character of the Paris Agreement’ (2016) 25RECIEL142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, D, ‘The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law?’ (1999) 93AJIL596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolintineanu, A, ‘Expression of Consent to Be Bound by a Treaty in the Light of the 1969 Vienna Convention’ (1974) 68AJIL672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonafé, BL and Palchetti, P, ‘Subsequent Practice in Treaty Interpretation between Article 31 and Article 32 of the Vienna Convention’ (2018) 46QuestInt’lL1Google Scholar
Bothe, M, ‘Legal and Non-Legal Norms – A Meaningful Distinction in International Relations?’ (1980) 11NYIL65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowett, DW, ‘Reservations to Non-Restricted Multilateral Treaties’ (1976–7) 48BYIL67Google Scholar
Bowman, MJ, ‘The Multilateral Treaty Amendment Process – A Case Study’ (1995) 44/3ICLQ540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, AE, ‘Saving the World? Implementation and Enforcement of International Environmental Law through International Institutions’ (1991) 3JEL229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brierly, JL, ‘Some Considerations on the Obsolescence of Treaties’ (1926) IITransactions of the Grotius Society4Google Scholar
Brölmann, Cet al, ‘Exiting International Organisations: A Brief Introduction’ (2018) 15/2IOLR243Google Scholar
Brölmann, C, ‘Law-Making Treaties: Form and Function in International Law’ (2005) 74NJIL383Google Scholar
Brunnée, J, ‘COPing with Consent: Law-Making under Multilateral Environmental Agreements’ (2002) 15LJIL1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, J and Toope, S, ‘International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an Interactional Theory of International Law’ (2000) 19ColumJTransnat’lL19Google Scholar
Buffard, I and Zemanek, K, ‘The “Object and Purpose” of a Treaty: An Enigma?’ (1998) 3/1ARIEL311Google Scholar
Burke, MB, ‘Dion and Theon: An Essentialist Solution to an Ancient Puzzle’ (1994) 91JPhilos129Google Scholar
Busutill, JJ, ‘The Bonn Declaration on International Terrorism: A Non-Binding Agreement on Aircraft Hijacking’ (1992) 31ICLQ474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cançado Trindade, AA, ‘The Time Factor in the Application of the Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Law’ (1978) 61RivDirInternaz232Google Scholar
Capotorti, F, ‘L’extinction et la suspension des traités’ (1971/III) 134RdC134Google Scholar
Carter, WR, ‘Dion’s Left Foot (and the Price of Burkean Economy)’ (1997) 57Philos&PhenomenolRes371Google Scholar
Castellarin, E, ‘La sentence partielle du 30 juin 2016 dans l’ affaire du différend territorial et maritime entre la Croatie et la Slovénie’ (2016) 52AFDI129Google Scholar
Churchill, RR and Ulfstein, G, ‘Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little-Noticed Phenomenon in International Law’ (2000) 94AJIL623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coing, H, ‘Trois formes historiques du droit: glossateurs, pandectistes, école de l’exégèse’ (1970) 48RHD531, 540Google Scholar
Coope, U, ‘Why Does Aristotle Say That There Is No Time without Change?’ (2001) 101Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, P, ‘Brexit: A Drama in Six Acts’ (2016) 40ELR447Google Scholar
Crawford, J and Olleson, S, ‘The Exception of Non-Performance: Links between the Law of Treaties and the State Responsibility’ (2000) 21AYBIL55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauchald, OK, ‘The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals – An Empirical Analysis (2008) 19EJIL301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreirós, J, ‘“What Fermented in Me for Years”: Cantor’s Discovery of Transfinite Numbers’ (1995) 22HistMath33Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Do Treaties Need Ratification?’ (1934) 15BYIL113Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, 1951–4: General Principles and Sources of Law’ (1953) 30BYIL1Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, 1951–4: Treaty Interpretation and Other Treaty Points’ (1957) 33BYIL203Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Consent to Be Bound – Anything New under the Sun?’ (2005) 74NJIL483Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Dynamic (Evolutive) Interpretation of Treaties – Part I’ (2008) 21HYIL101Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Dynamic (Evolutive) Interpretation of treaties – Part II’ (2009) 22HYIL3Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘Subsequent Agreement and Subsequent Practice: Some Reflections on the International Law Commission’s Draft Conclusions’ (2020) 22ICLR14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The Identification and Character of Treaties and Treaty Obligations between States in International Law’ (2002) 73/1BYIL141Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M, ‘The Tale of Two Judges: Sir Hersch Lauterpacht and Sir Gerald Fitzmaurice – Human Rights and the Interpretation of Treaties’ (2008) 61RHDI125Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M and Merkouris, P, ‘Re-Shaping Treaties while Balancing Interests of Stability and Change: Trends in the Amendment/Modification/Revision of Treaties’ (2015) 20/1ARIEL41Google Scholar
Fontanelli, F, ‘The Invocation of the Exception of Non-Performance: A Case-Study on the Role and Application of General Principles of International Law of Contractual Origin’ (2012) 1CJICL119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forlati, S, ‘Reactions to Non-Performance of Treaties in International Law’ (2012) 25/3LJIL759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgopoulos, Th, ‘Le droit intertemporel et les dispositions conventionelles évolutives – quelle thérapie contre la vieillesse des traits?’ (2004) 108/1RGDIP123Google Scholar
Gillespie, A, ‘Iceland’s Reservation at the International Whaling Commission’ (2003) 14EJIL977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraud, E, ‘Modification et terminaison des traités collectifs’ (1961) 49/1AIDI5Google Scholar
Guzman, AT and Meyer, TLO, ‘International Soft Law’ (2010) 2JLA171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwiazda, J, ‘A Proof of the Impossibility of Completing Infinitely Many Tasks’ (2012) 93PacPhilosQ1Google Scholar
Hafner, G, ‘L’ “obsolescence” de certaines dispositions du traité autrichien de 1955’ (1991) 37AFDI239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner, G, ‘Modification of Treaties by Subsequent Practice – Some Comments on the Austrian Position’ (2015) 20ARIEL175Google Scholar
Hamamoto, Y, ‘Possible Limitations to the Role of Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice – Viewed from Some State Practices’ (2020) 22/1 ICLR 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraszti, G, ‘Treaties and the Fundamental Change of Circumstances’ (1975/III) 146RdC1Google Scholar
Hartz, GA and Cover, JA, ‘Space and Time in the Leibnizian Metaphysic’ (1988) 22Noûs493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, CC, ‘Concerning the Interpretation of Treaties’ (1909) 3AJIL46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, CC, ‘Interpretation of Treaties by the Permanent Court of International Justice’ (1930) 24AJIL1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irving, R, ‘The United Kingdom Referendum – June 1975’ (1976) 1ELR3Google Scholar
Jennings, RY, ‘What Is International Law and How Do We Tell It When We See It?’ (1981) 37ASDI59Google Scholar
Kearney, RD and Dalton, RE, ‘The Treaty on Treaties’ (1970) 64AJIL495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiss, A, ‘Les actes unilatéraux dans la pratique française du droit international’ (1961) 65RGDIP317Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, ‘Accepting the Unacceptable? A New Nordic Approach to Reservations to Multilateral Treaties’ (2000) 69NJIL179Google Scholar
Klabbers, J, ‘The Redundancy of Soft Law’ (1996) 65NJIL167Google Scholar
Koester, V, ‘The Ramsar Convention: Which Parties Are Effectively Parties to What? (and Other Legal Issues)’ (2014) 44/1–2 EP&L100Google Scholar
Kolb, R, ‘La désuétude en droit international public’ (2007) 111/3RGDIP577Google Scholar
Kolbasov, JJ, ‘Pravovyje Mery Okhrany Morija ot Zagrazhenia s Sushi’ (Legal Measures for the Protection of the Sea Land-Based Pollution), Paper presented at the International Conference on Ecology and Law in the Baltic Sea Region: Sources and Development, held in Riga, 1990 (unpublished, on file with the authors)Google Scholar
Linderfalk, U, ‘The Application of International Legal Norms over Time: The Second Branch of Intertemporal Law’ (2011) 58/2NILR147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, U, ‘The Creation of Jus Cogens: Making Sense of Article 53 of the Vienna Convention’ (2011) 71ZaöRV359Google Scholar
Linderfalk, U, ‘Doing the Right Thing for the Right Reason – Why Dynamic or Static Approaches Should Be Taken in the Interpretation of Treaties’ (2008) 10ICLR109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linderfalk, U, ‘The Effect of Jus Cogens Norms: Whoever Opened Pandora’s Box, Did You Ever Think about the Consequences?’ (2007) 18EJIL853Google Scholar
Lipson, C, ‘Why Are Some International Agreements Informal?’ (1991) 45International Organisation495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissitzyn, OJ, ‘Treaties and Changed Circumstances (Rebus Sic Stantibus)’ (1967) 61AJIL895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lysen, G, ‘The Joint Declaration by the EEC and the CMEA’ (1989) 14NCJInt’lL & ComReg369Google Scholar
Magliveras, DK, ‘The Withdrawal from the League of Nations Revisited’ (1991) 10Penn State International Law Review25Google Scholar
Malkin, HW, ‘Reservations to Multilateral Conventions’ (1926) 7BYIL141Google Scholar
Marks, S, ‘Treaties, State Responsibility and Remedies’ (1990) 49/3CLJ387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall-Smith, KL, ‘Reservations and the Determinative Function of the Human Rights Treaty Bodies’ (2012) 54GYIL521Google Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘Interpreting the Customary Rules on Interpretation’ (2017) 19ICLR126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkouris, P, ‘(Inter)temporal Considerations in the Interpretative Process of the VCLT: Do Treaties Endure, Perdure or Exdure?’ (2014) 45NYIL121Google Scholar
Milanovic, M and Sicilianos, L-A, ‘Reservations to Treaties: An Introduction’ (2011) 24EJIL1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moloo, R, ‘When Actions Speak Louder Than Words: The Relevance of Subsequent Party Conduct to Treaty Interpretation’ (2013) 31/1BerkJIntlL39Google Scholar
Müllerson, R, ‘The ABM Treaty: Changed Circumstances, Extraordinary Events, Supreme Interests and International Law’ (2005) 59ICLQ509Google Scholar
Münch, F, ‘Comments on the 1968 Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1969) 29ZaöRV1Google Scholar
Nahlik, S, ‘La Conference de Vienne sur le droit des traités: une vue d’ensemble’ (1969) 15AFDI24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, Y, ‘Defining Boundaries of Legally Binding Treaties – A Study of Different State Practice in Treaty-Making’ (2018) 20ICLR169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Treaties and Their Practice – Symptoms of Their Rise or Decline’ (2018) 392RdC205Google Scholar
Norton, JD, ‘A Quantum Mechanical Supertask’ (1999) 29/8FoundPhys1265Google Scholar
Oberthür, S, ‘Ozone Layer Protection at the Turn of the Century: The Eleventh Meeting of the Parties’ (2000) 30/1–2 EP&L34Google Scholar
Oberthür, S and Lefeber, R, ‘Holding Countries to Account: The Kyoto Protocol’s Compliance System Revisited after Four Years of Experience’ (2010) 1Climate L133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostendorf, P, ‘The Withdrawal Cannot Be Withdrawn: The Irrevocability of a Withdrawal Notification under Article 50(2) TEU’ (2017) 42/5ELR767Google Scholar
Paddeu, F, ‘A Genealogy of Force Majeure in International Law’ (2011) 82BYIL381Google Scholar
Peters, JK, ‘Reservations to Multilateral Treaties: How International Legal Doctrine Reflects World Vision’ (1982-3) 23HILJ71Google Scholar
Plender, R, ‘The Role of Consent in the Termination of Treaties’ (1986) 57BYIL133Google Scholar
Pronto, AN, ‘The Effect of War on Law – What Happens to Their Treaties When States Go to War?’ (2013) 2CJICL227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadri, R, ‘Cours général de droit international public’ (1964/III) 113RdC237Google Scholar
Rajamani, L, ‘The 2015 Paris Agreement: Interplay between Hard, Soft and Non-Obligations’ (2016) 28JEL337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranganathan, S, ‘Between Philosophy and Anxiety? The Early International Law Commission, Treaty Conflict and the Project of International Law’ (2012) 83BYIL82Google Scholar
Rank, R, ‘Modern War and the Validity of Treaties: A Comparative Study’ (1953) 38CLQ321Google Scholar
Roessler, F, ‘Law, De Facto Agreements and Declarations of Principle in International Economic Relations’ (1978) 21GYIL27Google Scholar
Rogers, JM and Molzon, RE, ‘Some Lessons about the Law from Self-Referential Problems in Mathematics’ (1991–2) 90MichLRev992Google Scholar
Roucounas, E, ‘Engagements parallèles et contradictoires’ (1987/VI) 206RdC9Google Scholar
Roucounas, E, ‘The Users of International Law’ in Arsanjani, MHet al (eds), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W Michael Reisman (Brill/Martinus Nijhoff2010) 217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, A, ‘The International Legal Effects of Unilateral Declarations’ (1977) 71AJIL1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruda, JM, ‘Reservation to Treaties’ (1975) 146RdC 95Google Scholar
Sari, A, ‘Reversing a Withdrawal Notification under Article 50 TEU: Can a Member State Change Its Mind’ (2017) 42/4ELR451Google Scholar
Saydé, A, ‘Defining the Concept of Abuse of Union Law’ (2014) 33/1YEL138Google Scholar
Scelle, G, ‘Règles générales du droit de la paix’ (1933/IV) 46RdC327Google Scholar
Schachter, O, ‘The Twilight Existence of Nonbinding International Agreements’ (1977) 71AJIL296Google Scholar
Schiller, AA, ‘Custom in Classical Roman Law’ (1937) 24VaLRev268Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, G, ‘The Principles and Standards of International Economic Law’ (1966/I) 117RdC5Google Scholar
Schwelb, E, ‘Termination or Suspension of the Operation of a Treaty as a Consequence of Its Breach’ (1967) 7IJIL309Google Scholar
Setear, J, ‘An Iterative Perspective on Treaties: A Synthesis of International Relations Theory and International Law’ (1996) 37/1HILJ139Google Scholar
Shaw, M, ‘Case Concerning Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botswana/Namibia)’ (2000) 49ICLQ964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicilianos, L-A, ‘The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Dimension of the Relations of International Responsibility’ (2002) 13/5EJIL1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sicilianos, L-A, ‘The Relationship between Reprisals and Denunciation or Suspension of a Treaty’ (1993) 4EJIL341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simma, B, ‘Reflections on Article 60 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Its Background in General International Law’ (1970) 20ZOffR5Google Scholar
Simma, B, ‘Termination and Suspension of Treaties: Two Recent Austrian Cases’ (1978) 21GYIL74Google Scholar
Tietje, C, ‘The Changing Legal Structure of International Treaties as an Aspect of an Emerging Global Governance Architecture’ (1999) 42GYIL26Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C, ‘Obligations Arising for States without or against Their Will’ (1993/IV) 241RdC195Google Scholar
Treves, T, ‘The Expansion of International Law: General Course on Public International Law’ (2015) 398RdC9Google Scholar
Tridimas, T, ‘Article 50: An Endgame without an End?’ (2016) 27KLJ297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Mensbrugghe, Y, ‘Legal Status of International North Sea Conference Declarations’ (1990) 5IJECL15Google Scholar
Vidmar, J, ‘Unilateral Revocability in Wightman: Fixing Article 50 with Constitutional Tools’ (2019) 15/2EuConst359Google Scholar
Weil, P, ‘Towards Relative Normativity in International Law’ (1983) 77AJIL413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellens, K and Borchardt, G, ‘Soft Law in the European Community Law’ (1989) 14ELR267Google Scholar
Wessel, RA, ‘Informal International Law-Making as a New Form of World Legislation’ (2011) 8IOLR253Google Scholar
Widdows, K, ‘The Unilateral Denunciation of Treaties Containing No Denunciation Clause’ (1982) 53BYIL83Google Scholar
Wiersema, A, ‘The New International Law-Makers? Conferences of the Parties to Multilateral Environmental Agreements’ (2009) 1MichJInt’lL231Google Scholar
Witenberg, JC, ‘Onus probandi devant les jurisdictions arbitrales’ (1951) 55RGDIP321Google Scholar
Xiouri, M, ‘Material Breach of a Treaty: Some Remarks on the Partial Award of 30 June 2016 in the Matter of an Arbitration between Croatia and Slovenia’ (2019) 8/1CILJ131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiouri, M, ‘The Exceptio Non Adimpleti Contractus in Public International Law’ (2019) 21ICLR56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasseen, MK, ‘L’ interprétation des traités d’après la Convention de Vienne sur le Droit des Traités’ (1976) 151RdC1Google Scholar
UNGA, ‘Statute of the International Law Commission’ (21 November 1947) UNGA Res 174 (II) (as amended by UNGA Res 485 (V) (12 December 1950), 984 (X) (3 December 1955), 985 (X) (3 December 1955) and 36/39 (18 November 1981))Google Scholar
UNGA, ‘Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment’ (15 December 1972) UN Doc A/RES/2994Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G, ‘Third Report on State Responsibility’ (19 July 1991) UN Doc A/CN.4/440 and Add.1, reproduced in [1991/II – Part One] YBILC 1Google Scholar
Brierly, JL, ‘First Report on the Law of Treaties’ (14 April 1950) UN Doc A/CN.4/23, reproduced in [1950/II] YBILC 222Google Scholar
Cedeño, VR, ‘Fourth Report on Unilateral Acts of States’ (30 May 2001) UN Doc A/CN.4/519, reproduced in [2001/II – Part One] YBILC 115Google Scholar
Cedeño, VR, ‘Third Report on Unilateral Acts of States’ (17 February 2000) UN Doc A/CN.4/505, reproduced in [2000/II – Part One] YBILC 247Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Second Report on State Responsibility’ UN Doc A/CN.4/498 and Add.1–4, reproduced in [1999/II – Part One] YBILC 3Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Third Report on State Responsibility’ (15 March, 15 June, 10 and 18 July, and 4 August 2000) UN Doc A/CN.4/507 and Add. 1–4Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Fourth Report on the Law of Treaties’ (17 March 1959) UN Doc A/CN.4/120, reproduced in [1959/II] YBILC 37Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Second Report on the Law of Treaties’ (15 March 1957) UN Doc A/CN.4/107, reproduced in [1957/II] YBILC 16Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties’ (18 March 1958) UN Doc A/CN.4/115, reproduced in [1958/II] YBILC 20Google Scholar
ILC ‘Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with Commentaries’ (4 May–19 July 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/191, reproduced in [1966/II] YBILC 187Google Scholar
ILC Study Group, ‘Annex A. Treaties over Time in Particular: Subsequent Agreement and Practice’, reproduced in [2008/II – Part Two] YBILC 152Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries’ (23 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2001) UN Doc A/56/10, reproduced in [2001/II – Part Two] YBILC 31Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Conclusions on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties, with Commentaries’ (30 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2018) UN Doc A/73/10, reproduced in [2018/II – Part Two] YBILC 11Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Guide to Practice on Reservations to Treaties, with Commentaries’ (26 April–3 June and 4 July–12 August 2011) UN Doc A/66/10/Add.1Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Guiding Principles Applicable to Unilateral Declarations of States Capable of Creating Legal Obligations, with Commentaries thereto’ [2006/II – Part Two] YBILC 161Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the Commission to the General Assembly on the Work of Its 49th Session’ [1997/II – Part Two] YBILC 1Google Scholar
ILC Study Group, ‘Report on Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, finalised by Martti Koskenniemi’ (13 April 2006) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission Covering the Work of Its 16th Session’ (11 May–24 July 1964) UN Doc A/5809Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 18th Session’ 4 May–19 July 1966) UN Doc A/6309/Rev.l, reproduced in [1966/II] YBILC 172Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 44th Session’ (4 May–24 July 1992) UN Doc A/47/10, reproduced in [1992/II – Part Two] YBILC 1Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 66th Session’ (5 May–6 June and 7 July–8 August 2014) UN Doc A/69/10Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 68th Session’ (2 May–10 June and 4 July–12 August 2016) UN Doc A/71/10Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties: Text of the Draft Conclusions adopted by the Drafting Committee on Second Reading’ (11 May 2018) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.907Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1585th Meeting’ (6 May 1980) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1585Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 691st Meeting’ (31 May 1963) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.691Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 693rd Meeting’ (5 July 1963) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.693Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 728th Meeting’ (21 May 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.728Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 729th Meeting’ (22 May 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.729Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 744th Meeting’ (12 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.744Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 745th Meeting’ (15 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.745Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 746th Meeting’ (16 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.746Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 747th Meeting’ (17 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.747Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 753rd Meeting’ (26 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.753Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 754th Meeting’ (29 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.754Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 764th Meeting’ (13 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.764Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 765th Meeting’ (14 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.765Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 766th Meeting’ (15 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.766Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 767th Meeting’ (16 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.767Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 769th Meeting’ (17 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.769Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 770th Meeting’ (20 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.770Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 831st Meeting’ (14 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.831Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 832nd Meeting’ (17 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.832Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 833rd Meeting’ (18 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.833Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 834th Meeting’ (19 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.834Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 845th Meeting’ (5 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.845Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 847th Meeting’ (9 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.847Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 848th Meeting’ (10 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.848Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 857th Meeting’ (24 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.857Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 859th Meeting’ (26 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.859Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 860th Meeting’ (27 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.860Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 866th Meeting’ (9 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.866Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 869th Meeting’ (14 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.869Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 870th Meeting’ (15 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.870Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 871st Meeting’ (16 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.871Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 872nd Meeting’ (17 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.872Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 873rd Meeting’ (20 July 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.873Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 875th Meeting’ (22 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.875Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 876th Meeting’ (23 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.876Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 883rd Meeting’ (4 July 1966) UN Doc A/ CN.4/SR.883Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 888th Meeting’ (12 July 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.888Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1858th Meeting’ (10 July 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1858Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1860th Meeting’ (12 July 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1860Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1867th Meeting’ (20 July 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1867Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, ‘Second Report on the Law of Treaties’ (8 June 1954) UN Doc A/CN.4/87 and Corr.1, reproduced in [1954/II] YBILC 123Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Fifth Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to Treaty Interpretation’ (28 February 2018) UN Doc A/CN.4/715Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘First Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to Treaty Interpretation’ (19 March 2013) UN Doc A/CN.4/660Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Fourth Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’ (7 March 2016) UN Doc A/CN.4/694Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Second Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’ (26 March 2014) UN Doc A/CN.4/671Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Third Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’ (7 April 2015) UN Doc A/CN.4/683Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Fifteenth Report on Reservations to Treaties’ (31 March, 26 May, and 31 May 2010) UN Doc A/CN.4/624 and Add.1-2Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Fifth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (4 April 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/380 and Corr.1, reproduced in [1984/II – Part One] YBILC 1Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Fourth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (14–15 April 1983) UN Doc A/CN.4/366 and Add.1 & Add.1/Corr.1, reproduced in [1983/II – Part One] YBILC 3Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Preliminary Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (1 April 1980) UN Doc A/CN.4/330, reproduced in [1980/II – Part One] YBILC 107Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Seventh Report on State Responsibility’ (4 March and 23 April 1986) UN Doc A/CN.4/397 and Corr.1 & 2 and Add.1 & Corr.1, reproduced in [1986/II – Part One] YBILC 1Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Sixth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (2 April 1985) UN Doc A/CN.4/389 and Corr.1 & Corr.2, reproduced in [1985/II – Part One] YBILC 3Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘First Report on the Law of Treaties’ (26 March 1962) UN Doc A/CN.4/144 and Add.1, reproduced in [1962/II] YBILC 28Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘Second Report on the Law of Treaties’ (20 March, 10 April, 30 April and 5 June 1963) UN Doc A/CN.4/156 and Add.1–3, reproduced in [1963/II] YBILC 36Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘Sixth Report on the Law of Treaties’ (11 March, 25 March, 12 April, 11 May, 17 May, 24 May, 1 June, and 14 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/186 and Add. 1–7, reproduced in [1966/II] YBILC 51Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties’ (3 March, 9 June, 12 June, and 7 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/167 and Add.1–3, reproduced in [1964/II] YBILC 5Google Scholar
Wood, M, ‘Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law’ (27 March 2015) UN Doc A/CN.4/682Google Scholar
Sixth Committee, ‘20th Session, Summary Record of the 843rd Meeting’ (7 October 1965) UN Doc A/C.6/20/SR.843Google Scholar
Sixth Committee, ‘20th Session, Summary Record of the 845th Meeting’ (11 October 1965) UN Doc A/C.6/SR.845Google Scholar
Sixth Committee, ‘20th Session, Summary Record of the 850th Meeting’ (13 October 1965) UN Doc A/C.6/SR.850Google Scholar
Australia, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 41’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.237Google Scholar
Colombia, Spain, and Venezuela, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 53’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.307, Add.1 and 2Google Scholar
France, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 41’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.46Google Scholar
Netherlands, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 40’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.232Google Scholar
UK, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 53’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.311Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 15th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (5 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.15 80Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 19th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (9 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.19 97Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 31st Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (19 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.31 164Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 33rd Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (22 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.33 177Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 37th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (24 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/11 203Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 38th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (25 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/11 210Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 58th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (8 May 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.58 334Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 62nd Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (9 May 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.62 361Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘2nd Session – 11th Plenary Meeting’ (30 April 1969) UN Doc A/CONF.39/SR.11 35Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘2nd Session – 86th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (11 April 1969) UN Doc A/CONF.39/11/Add.1 222Google Scholar
4
UNGA, ‘Statute of the International Law Commission’ (21 November 1947) UNGA Res 174 (II) (as amended by UNGA Res 485 (V) (12 December 1950), 984 (X) (3 December 1955), 985 (X) (3 December 1955) and 36/39 (18 November 1981))Google Scholar
UNGA, ‘Stockholm Declaration on the Human Environment’ (15 December 1972) UN Doc A/RES/2994Google Scholar
5
Arangio-Ruiz, G, ‘Third Report on State Responsibility’ (19 July 1991) UN Doc A/CN.4/440 and Add.1, reproduced in [1991/II – Part One] YBILC 1Google Scholar
Brierly, JL, ‘First Report on the Law of Treaties’ (14 April 1950) UN Doc A/CN.4/23, reproduced in [1950/II] YBILC 222Google Scholar
Cedeño, VR, ‘Fourth Report on Unilateral Acts of States’ (30 May 2001) UN Doc A/CN.4/519, reproduced in [2001/II – Part One] YBILC 115Google Scholar
Cedeño, VR, ‘Third Report on Unilateral Acts of States’ (17 February 2000) UN Doc A/CN.4/505, reproduced in [2000/II – Part One] YBILC 247Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Second Report on State Responsibility’ UN Doc A/CN.4/498 and Add.1–4, reproduced in [1999/II – Part One] YBILC 3Google Scholar
Crawford, J, ‘Third Report on State Responsibility’ (15 March, 15 June, 10 and 18 July, and 4 August 2000) UN Doc A/CN.4/507 and Add. 1–4Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Fourth Report on the Law of Treaties’ (17 March 1959) UN Doc A/CN.4/120, reproduced in [1959/II] YBILC 37Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Second Report on the Law of Treaties’ (15 March 1957) UN Doc A/CN.4/107, reproduced in [1957/II] YBILC 16Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties’ (18 March 1958) UN Doc A/CN.4/115, reproduced in [1958/II] YBILC 20Google Scholar
ILC ‘Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with Commentaries’ (4 May–19 July 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/191, reproduced in [1966/II] YBILC 187Google Scholar
ILC Study Group, ‘Annex A. Treaties over Time in Particular: Subsequent Agreement and Practice’, reproduced in [2008/II – Part Two] YBILC 152Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries’ (23 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2001) UN Doc A/56/10, reproduced in [2001/II – Part Two] YBILC 31Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Draft Conclusions on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties, with Commentaries’ (30 April–1 June and 2 July–10 August 2018) UN Doc A/73/10, reproduced in [2018/II – Part Two] YBILC 11Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Guide to Practice on Reservations to Treaties, with Commentaries’ (26 April–3 June and 4 July–12 August 2011) UN Doc A/66/10/Add.1Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Guiding Principles Applicable to Unilateral Declarations of States Capable of Creating Legal Obligations, with Commentaries thereto’ [2006/II – Part Two] YBILC 161Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the Commission to the General Assembly on the Work of Its 49th Session’ [1997/II – Part Two] YBILC 1Google Scholar
ILC Study Group, ‘Report on Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, finalised by Martti Koskenniemi’ (13 April 2006) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission Covering the Work of Its 16th Session’ (11 May–24 July 1964) UN Doc A/5809Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 18th Session’ 4 May–19 July 1966) UN Doc A/6309/Rev.l, reproduced in [1966/II] YBILC 172Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 44th Session’ (4 May–24 July 1992) UN Doc A/47/10, reproduced in [1992/II – Part Two] YBILC 1Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 66th Session’ (5 May–6 June and 7 July–8 August 2014) UN Doc A/69/10Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its 68th Session’ (2 May–10 June and 4 July–12 August 2016) UN Doc A/71/10Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties: Text of the Draft Conclusions adopted by the Drafting Committee on Second Reading’ (11 May 2018) UN Doc A/CN.4/L.907Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1585th Meeting’ (6 May 1980) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1585Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 691st Meeting’ (31 May 1963) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.691Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 693rd Meeting’ (5 July 1963) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.693Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 728th Meeting’ (21 May 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.728Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 729th Meeting’ (22 May 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.729Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 744th Meeting’ (12 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.744Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 745th Meeting’ (15 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.745Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 746th Meeting’ (16 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.746Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 747th Meeting’ (17 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.747Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 753rd Meeting’ (26 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.753Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 754th Meeting’ (29 June 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.754Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 764th Meeting’ (13 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.764Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 765th Meeting’ (14 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.765Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 766th Meeting’ (15 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.766Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 767th Meeting’ (16 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.767Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 769th Meeting’ (17 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.769Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 770th Meeting’ (20 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.770Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 831st Meeting’ (14 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.831Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 832nd Meeting’ (17 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.832Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 833rd Meeting’ (18 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.833Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 834th Meeting’ (19 January 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.834Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 845th Meeting’ (5 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.845Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 847th Meeting’ (9 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.847Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 848th Meeting’ (10 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.848Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 857th Meeting’ (24 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.857Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 859th Meeting’ (26 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.859Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 860th Meeting’ (27 May 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.860Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 866th Meeting’ (9 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.866Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 869th Meeting’ (14 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.869Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 870th Meeting’ (15 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.870Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 871st Meeting’ (16 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.871Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 872nd Meeting’ (17 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.872Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 873rd Meeting’ (20 July 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.873Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 875th Meeting’ (22 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.875Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 876th Meeting’ (23 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.876Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 883rd Meeting’ (4 July 1966) UN Doc A/ CN.4/SR.883Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 888th Meeting’ (12 July 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.888Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1858th Meeting’ (10 July 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1858Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1860th Meeting’ (12 July 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1860Google Scholar
ILC, ‘Summary Record of the 1867th Meeting’ (20 July 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/SR.1867Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, ‘Second Report on the Law of Treaties’ (8 June 1954) UN Doc A/CN.4/87 and Corr.1, reproduced in [1954/II] YBILC 123Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Fifth Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to Treaty Interpretation’ (28 February 2018) UN Doc A/CN.4/715Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘First Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to Treaty Interpretation’ (19 March 2013) UN Doc A/CN.4/660Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Fourth Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’ (7 March 2016) UN Doc A/CN.4/694Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Second Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’ (26 March 2014) UN Doc A/CN.4/671Google Scholar
Nolte, G, ‘Third Report on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to the Interpretation of Treaties’ (7 April 2015) UN Doc A/CN.4/683Google Scholar
Pellet, A, ‘Fifteenth Report on Reservations to Treaties’ (31 March, 26 May, and 31 May 2010) UN Doc A/CN.4/624 and Add.1-2Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Fifth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (4 April 1984) UN Doc A/CN.4/380 and Corr.1, reproduced in [1984/II – Part One] YBILC 1Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Fourth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (14–15 April 1983) UN Doc A/CN.4/366 and Add.1 & Add.1/Corr.1, reproduced in [1983/II – Part One] YBILC 3Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Preliminary Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (1 April 1980) UN Doc A/CN.4/330, reproduced in [1980/II – Part One] YBILC 107Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Seventh Report on State Responsibility’ (4 March and 23 April 1986) UN Doc A/CN.4/397 and Corr.1 & 2 and Add.1 & Corr.1, reproduced in [1986/II – Part One] YBILC 1Google Scholar
Riphagen, W, ‘Sixth Report on the Content, Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility’ (2 April 1985) UN Doc A/CN.4/389 and Corr.1 & Corr.2, reproduced in [1985/II – Part One] YBILC 3Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘First Report on the Law of Treaties’ (26 March 1962) UN Doc A/CN.4/144 and Add.1, reproduced in [1962/II] YBILC 28Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘Second Report on the Law of Treaties’ (20 March, 10 April, 30 April and 5 June 1963) UN Doc A/CN.4/156 and Add.1–3, reproduced in [1963/II] YBILC 36Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘Sixth Report on the Law of Treaties’ (11 March, 25 March, 12 April, 11 May, 17 May, 24 May, 1 June, and 14 June 1966) UN Doc A/CN.4/186 and Add. 1–7, reproduced in [1966/II] YBILC 51Google Scholar
Waldock, H, ‘Third Report on the Law of Treaties’ (3 March, 9 June, 12 June, and 7 July 1964) UN Doc A/CN.4/167 and Add.1–3, reproduced in [1964/II] YBILC 5Google Scholar
Wood, M, ‘Third Report on Identification of Customary International Law’ (27 March 2015) UN Doc A/CN.4/682Google Scholar
6
Sixth Committee, ‘20th Session, Summary Record of the 843rd Meeting’ (7 October 1965) UN Doc A/C.6/20/SR.843Google Scholar
Sixth Committee, ‘20th Session, Summary Record of the 845th Meeting’ (11 October 1965) UN Doc A/C.6/SR.845Google Scholar
Sixth Committee, ‘20th Session, Summary Record of the 850th Meeting’ (13 October 1965) UN Doc A/C.6/SR.850Google Scholar
Australia, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 41’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.237Google Scholar
Colombia, Spain, and Venezuela, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 53’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.307, Add.1 and 2Google Scholar
France, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 41’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.46Google Scholar
Netherlands, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 40’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.232Google Scholar
UK, ‘Amendment Proposal to Article 53’ UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/L.311Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 15th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (5 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.15 80Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 19th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (9 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.19 97Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 31st Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (19 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.31 164Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 33rd Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (22 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.33 177Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 37th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (24 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/11 203Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 38th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (25 April 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/11 210Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 58th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (8 May 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.58 334Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘1st Session – 62nd Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (9 May 1968) UN Doc A/CONF.39/C.1/SR.62 361Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘2nd Session – 11th Plenary Meeting’ (30 April 1969) UN Doc A/CONF.39/SR.11 35Google Scholar
United Nations Conference on the Law of Treaties, ‘2nd Session – 86th Meeting of the Committee of the Whole (COW)’ (11 April 1969) UN Doc A/CONF.39/11/Add.1 222Google Scholar
9
Institut de Droit International, ‘De l’interprétation des traités’(1950) 43/1AIDI336Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘De l’ interprétation des traités’ (1952) 44AIDI359Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘De l’interprétation des traités’(1956) 46AIDI359Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘Modifications et terminaison des traités collectifs’ (1961/I) 49AIDI229Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘Problems Arising from a Succession of Codification Conventions on a Particular Subject’ (1995/I) 66AIDI248Google Scholar
Institut de Droit International, ‘Resolution of 11 August 1975: The Intertemporal Problem in Public International Law’ (1975) 56AIDI536Google Scholar
Virally, M, ‘Rapport définitif: La distinction entre textes internationaux ayant une portée juridique dans les relations mutuelles entre leur auteurs et les textes juridiques qui en sont dépourvus’ (1983) 60/IAIDI328Google Scholar
Virally, M, ‘Rapport provisoire: La distinction entre textes internationaux ayant une portée juridique dans les relations mutuelles entre leur auteurs et les textes juridiques qui en sont dépourvus’ (1983) 60/IAIDI166Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘The Report of the Legal Drafting Group on Possible Adjustments and Amendment of the Montreal Protocol’ (17 June 1999) UN Doc UNEP/OzL.Pro.11/3Google Scholar
World Tourism Organisation, ‘Report of the Secretary-General: Other Administrative and Statutory Matters – Status of Ratification of Amendments to the Statutes and of the 1947 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies’ (1 October 2018) UN Doc CE/109/3(d)iiiGoogle Scholar
CMP1, ‘Decision 27/CMP.1: Procedures and Mechanisms Relating to Compliance under the Kyoto Protocol’ (9–10 December 2005) UN Doc FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.3Google Scholar
ECOSOC, ‘Activities of Other Organizations and Countries of Interest to the Working Party’ (22 December 2008) UN Doc ECE/TRANS/WP.30/2009/1Google Scholar
France, ‘Observations by France on General Comment 24’ (1997) 4IHRR6Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 1: Convention on Treaties’(1935) 29AJIL Supp1205Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 2: David Dudley Field’s Draft Code’(1935) 29AJIL Supp1207Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 3: Bluntschli’s Draft Code’(1935) 29AJIL Supp1208Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 4: Fiore’s Draft Code’ (1935) 29AJIL Supp1212Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 5: Draft of the International Commission of American Jurists’ (1935) 29AJIL Supp1222Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 7: The Interpretation of Treaties’ (1935) 29AJIL Supp1225Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1935) 29AJIL Supp657Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, ‘General Comment on Issues Relating to Reservations Made upon Ratification or Accession to the Covenant or the Optional Protocols Thereto, or in Relation to Declarations under Article 41 of the Covenant’ (4 November 1994) UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.6Google Scholar
ITU, ‘Resolution No 62: Basic Instruments of the Union’ (1982) 1531 UNTS 493Google Scholar
Security Consultative Committee, ‘Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee – A Stronger Alliance for a Dynamic Security Environment: The New Guidelines for Japan–US Defence Cooperation’ (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 27 April 2015) www.mofa.go.jp/files/000078186.pdf>>Google Scholar
UK, ‘Observations by the United Kingdom on General Comment 24’ (1996) 3IHRR261Google Scholar
UNCED, ‘Rio Declaration on Environment and Development’ (1992) 31ILM874Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘Decision III/1: Amendment to the Basel Convention’ (28 November 1995) UN Doc UNEP/CHW.3/35Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘Report of the 2nd Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer’ (29 June 1990) UN Doc UNEP/OZL.Pro.2/3, Decision II/2Google Scholar
UNFCCC, ‘Proposal from Saudi Arabia to Amend the Kyoto Protocol’ (26 May 2005) UN Doc FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/2Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘The Report of the Legal Drafting Group on Possible Adjustments and Amendment of the Montreal Protocol’ (17 June 1999) UN Doc UNEP/OzL.Pro.11/3Google Scholar
World Tourism Organisation, ‘Report of the Secretary-General: Other Administrative and Statutory Matters – Status of Ratification of Amendments to the Statutes and of the 1947 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies’ (1 October 2018) UN Doc CE/109/3(d)iiiGoogle Scholar
CMP1, ‘Decision 27/CMP.1: Procedures and Mechanisms Relating to Compliance under the Kyoto Protocol’ (9–10 December 2005) UN Doc FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.3Google Scholar
ECOSOC, ‘Activities of Other Organizations and Countries of Interest to the Working Party’ (22 December 2008) UN Doc ECE/TRANS/WP.30/2009/1Google Scholar
France, ‘Observations by France on General Comment 24’ (1997) 4IHRR6Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 1: Convention on Treaties’(1935) 29AJIL Supp1205Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 2: David Dudley Field’s Draft Code’(1935) 29AJIL Supp1207Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 3: Bluntschli’s Draft Code’(1935) 29AJIL Supp1208Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 4: Fiore’s Draft Code’ (1935) 29AJIL Supp1212Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 5: Draft of the International Commission of American Jurists’ (1935) 29AJIL Supp1222Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Appendix 7: The Interpretation of Treaties’ (1935) 29AJIL Supp1225Google Scholar
Garner, JW (Reporter), ‘Codification of International Law: Part III – Law of Treaties – Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1935) 29AJIL Supp657Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee, ‘General Comment on Issues Relating to Reservations Made upon Ratification or Accession to the Covenant or the Optional Protocols Thereto, or in Relation to Declarations under Article 41 of the Covenant’ (4 November 1994) UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.6Google Scholar
ITU, ‘Resolution No 62: Basic Instruments of the Union’ (1982) 1531 UNTS 493Google Scholar
Security Consultative Committee, ‘Joint Statement of the Security Consultative Committee – A Stronger Alliance for a Dynamic Security Environment: The New Guidelines for Japan–US Defence Cooperation’ (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 27 April 2015) www.mofa.go.jp/files/000078186.pdf>>Google Scholar
UK, ‘Observations by the United Kingdom on General Comment 24’ (1996) 3IHRR261Google Scholar
UNCED, ‘Rio Declaration on Environment and Development’ (1992) 31ILM874Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘Decision III/1: Amendment to the Basel Convention’ (28 November 1995) UN Doc UNEP/CHW.3/35Google Scholar
UNEP, ‘Report of the 2nd Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer’ (29 June 1990) UN Doc UNEP/OZL.Pro.2/3, Decision II/2Google Scholar
UNFCCC, ‘Proposal from Saudi Arabia to Amend the Kyoto Protocol’ (26 May 2005) UN Doc FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/2Google Scholar