Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-vh8gq Total loading time: 0.605 Render date: 2022-10-03T03:04:01.630Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Chapter 6 - Evaluating embryo development stages using time-lapse microscopy (TLM)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2016

Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Edwards, RG, Fishel, SB, Fehilly, CB, Purdy, JM, Slater, JM, Cohen, J, et al. Factors influencing the success of in-vitro fertilization for alleviating human infertility. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1984;1:323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, DS, Abdelhafez, F, Russell, H, Goldfarb, J, Desai, N. Severe teratozoospermia and its influence on pronuclear morphology, embryonic cleavage and compaction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;22;9:37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgetti, C, Hans, E, Terriou, P, Salzmann, J, Barry, B, Chabert-Orsini, V, et al. Early cleavage: an additional predictor of high implantation rate following elective single embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:8591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hesters, L, Prisant, N, Fanchin, R, Méndez Lozano, DH, Feyereisen, E, Frydman, R, et al. Impact of early cleaved zygote morphology on embryo development and in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome: a prospective study. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1677–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lian, WL, Xin, ZM, Jin, HX, Song, WY, Peng, ZF, Sun, YP. Effects of early-cleavage embryo transfer on in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer pregnancy outcomes. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013;40:319–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Machtinger, R, Racowsky, C. Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26:210–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terriou, P, Giorgetti, C, Hans, E, Salzmann, J, Charles, O, Cignetti, L, et al. Relationship between even early cleavage and day 2 embryo score and assessment of their predictive value for pregnancy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:294–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1270–83.PubMed
Herrero, J and Meseguer, M. Selection of high potential embryos using time-lapse imaging: the era of morphokinetics. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1030–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkegaard, K, Agerholm, IE, Ingerslev, HJ. Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1277–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holte, J, Berglund, L, Milton, K, Garello, C, Gennarelli, G, Revelli, A, Bergh, T. Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:548–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prados, FJ, Debrock, S, Lemmen, JG, Agerholm, I. The cleavage stage embryo. Hum Reprod. 2012;27 Suppl 1:i50–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Racowsky, C, Vernon, M, Mayer, J, Ball, GD, Behr, B, Pomeroy, KO, et al. Standardization of grading embryo morphology. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1152–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guerif, F, Frapsauce, C, Chavez, C, Cadoret, V, Royere, D. Treating women under 36 years old without top-quality embryos on day 2: a prospective study comparing double embryo transfer with single blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:775–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Royen, E, Mangelschots, K, Vercruyssen, M, De Neubourg, D, Valkenburg, M, Ryckaert, G, et al. Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1062–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Ambroggio, J, Gindoff, PR, Dayal, MB, Khaldi, R, Peak, D, Frankfurter, D, et al. Multinucleation of a sibling blastomere on day 2 suggests unsuitability for embryo transfer in IVF-preimplantation genetic screening cycles. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:856–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, SJ, Taylor, A, Johnson, MH, Braude, PR. An analysis of multinucleated blastomere formation in human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1912–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Veek, LL. Preembryo grading and degree of cytoplasmic fragmentation. In: An Atlas of Human Gametes and Conceptuses: An Illustrated Reference for Assisted Reproductive Technology. New York, USA: Parthenon Publishing, 1999: pp. 4651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebner, T, Moser, M, Sommergruber, M, Gaiswinkler, U, Shebl, O, Jesacher, K, et al. Occurrence and developmental consequences of vacuoles throughout preimplantation development. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1635–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabrielsen, A, Lindenberg, S, Petersen, K. The impact of the zona pellucida thickness variation of human embryos on pregnancy outcome in relation to suboptimal embryo development. A prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2166–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, YP, Xu, Y, Cao, T, Su, YC, Guo, YH. Zona pellucida thickness and clinical pregnancy outcome following in vitro fertilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;89:258–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Cruguel, S, Ferré-L’Hôtellier, V, Morinière, C, Lemerle, S, Reynier, P, Descamps, P, et al. Early compaction at day 3 may be a useful additional criterion for embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:683–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skiadas, CC, Jackson, KV, Racowsky, C. Early compaction on day 3 may be associated with increased implantation potential. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:1386–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomari, H, Honjou, K, Nagata, Y, Horiuchi, T. Relationship between meiotic spindle characteristics in human oocytes and the timing of the first zygotic cleavage after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:1099–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×