Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T22:42:21.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Endogenous real business cycles and international Specialization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2010

Wilfred J. Ethier
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Elhanan Helpman
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
J. Peter Neary
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This study investigates, from the viewpoint of endogenous real business cycles, the relationship between international specialization and dynamic behavior of multiple countries' economic activities (business cycles) in a two-good, two-factor model in which capital is freely mobile internationally. Among the many areas of international economics to which Professor Ronald Jones has made major contributions are the determination of trade patterns and the international movement of capital. In his early work, Professor Jones investigated world specialization patterns in models in which production factors are internationally immobile (Jones, 1956 and 1961). He then extended his research to the case in which capital is freely mobile internationally. In this setting, he investigated the determinants of capital flows and the roles of tariff and tax policies (Jones, 1967, 1987 and 1989, Jones and Ruffin, 1975, and Jones and Dei, 1983). Through this long sequence of insightful research, Professor Jones has illuminated the critical role that the international movement of capital plays in the determination of a world specialization pattern. We are both graduates of the University of Rochester, the school that Professor Jones has helped to become a center of economic thought, and we are honored to have this opportunity to present our study involving a subject to which he has made such an important contribution.

The relationship between international specialization and international business cycles has long been considered in the context of what may be called the hypothesis of trade destabilization, the proposition that trade destablizes a (small) less-developed country by making the country overly specialized in a small part of the primary sector, thereby subjecting it to the (larger) business cycles of (more developed) large countries.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×