Adler, Mortimer J. “Problems for Thomists: I. – The Problem of Species (Part One).” The Thomist 1, no. 1 (1939): 80–122.Google Scholar

Adler, Mortimer J. “Problems for Thomists: I. – The Problem of Species (Part Two).” The Thomist 1, no. 2 (1939): 237–70.Google Scholar

Adler, Mortimer J. “Problems for Thomists: I. – The Problem of Species (Part Three).” The Thomist 1, no. 3 (1939): 381–443.Google Scholar

Adler, Mortimer J. “Problems for Thomists: I. – The Problem of Species (Part Four).” The Thomist 2, no. 1 (1940): 88–155.Google Scholar

Adler, Mortimer J. “Problems for Thomists: I. – The Problem of Species (Part Five).” The Thomist 2, no. 2 (1940): 237–300.Google Scholar

Albert the Great. Questions Concerning Aristotle’s On Animals. Translated by Irven M Resnick and Kenneth F Kitchell. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Alexander, Andrew. “Human Origins and Genetics.” Clergy Review 49, no. 6 (1964): 344–53.Google Scholar

Alexander, Denis. Creation or Evolution: Do We Have to Choose? Oxford: Monarch Books, 2008.Google Scholar

Allen, Colin, Bekoff, Marc, and Lauder, George, eds. Nature’s Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1998.Google Scholar

Allen, Colin, and Neal, Jacob. “Teleological Notions in Biology.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford University, 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/teleology-biology/. Retrieved 20 July 2022.Google Scholar

Allis, C. David, Caparros, Marie-Laure, Jenuwein, Thomas, and Reinberg, Danny, eds. Epigenetics, Second Edition. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Alszeghy, Zoltan, and Flick, Maurizio. “Il Peccato Originale in Prospettiva Personalistica.” Gregorianum 46, no. 4 (1965): 705–32.Google Scholar

Ambrose. Hexameron, Paradise, and Cain and Abel. Translated by John J. Savage. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Amundson, Ron. The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Aquinas on Creation: Writings on the “Sentences” of Peter Lombard Book 2, Distinction 1, Question 1. Translated by William E. Carroll and Steven E. Baldner. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1997.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Aquinas: Selected Writings. Translated by Robert P. Goodwin. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Compendium theologiae seu brevis compilation theologiae ad fratrem Raynaldum. In Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, Vol. 42. Rome: Editori di San Tommaso, 1979, 83–191. [English translation: Compendium of Theology, tr. C. Vollert. St. Louis: B. Herder Book Co., 1947.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. De ente et essentia. In Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, Vol. 43. Rome: Editori di San Tommaso, 1976, 131–57. [English translation: Aquinas on Being and Essence: A translation and Interpretation, tr. Joseph Bobik. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1965.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. De mixtione elementorum ad magistrum Philippum de Castro Caeli. In Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, Vol. 43. Rome: Typographia polyglotta, 1976, 315–81. [English translation: Aquinas on Matter and Form and the Elements: A Translation and Interpretation of the De Principiis Naturae and the De Mixtione Elementorum of St. Thomas Aquinas, tr. Joseph Bobik. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1998.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. De principiis naturae. Vol. 43 of Opera Omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita. Rome. Typographia polyglotta, 1976, 39–47. [English translation: The Principles of Nature. In Selected Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas. Edited and translated by Robert P. Goodwin. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965, 7–28.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In Aristotelis librum De anima commentarium. Vol. 45/1 of Opera Omnia. Rome: Typographia polyglotta, 1984. [English translation: Aristotle’s De Anima in the Version of William of Moerbeke and the Commentary of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by Kenelm Foster and Silvester Humphries. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1951.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In Librum Boethii de Trinitate, Quaestiones Quinta et Sexta, ed. Wyser, Paul. Fribourg: Societe Philosophique and Louvain: Nauwelaerts, 1948. [English translation: The Division and Methods of the Sciences. Quaestions V and VI of his Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius translated with Introduction and Notes, Third Revised Edition by Armand Maurer. Toronto: The Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1963.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In Metaphysicam Aristotelis commentaria. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1926. [English translation: Commentary on The Metaphysics of Aristotle. 2 vols. Translated by John Rowan. Chicago: Regnery Press, 1961.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis expositio. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1965. [English translation: Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics. Translated by Richard J. Blackwell, Richard J. Spath, and W. Edmund Thirlkel. Notre Dame, IN: Dumb Ox Books, 1999.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestio disputata de anima. Edited by Robb, James H.. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1968. [English translation: Quaestions on the Soul. Translated by James H. Robb. Milwaukee, Wis.: Marquette University Press, 1984.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de malo. Vol. 23 of Opera Omnia. Rome: Typographia polyglotta, 1982. [English translation: On Evil. Translated by John A. Oesterle and Jean T. Oesterle. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de potentia Dei. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1965. [English translation: On the Power of God. Translated by English Dominican Fathers. Westminster, MD: Newman Press, 1952.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de veritate. Vol. 22/1–3 of Opera Omnia. Rome: Typographia polyglotta, 1972–1976. [English translation: Truth. 3 vols. Translated by Robert W. Mulligan S.J. et al. Albany, New York: Preserving Christian Publications, 1993.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de virtutibus. In Quaestionis disputatae vol. 2, 10th ed. Edited by Odetto, E.. Turin: Marietti, 1965, 707–828. [English Translation: Disputed Questions on Virtue: Quaestio Disputata de Virtutibus in Communi and Quaestio Disputata de Virtutibus Cardinalibus. Translated by Ralph McInerny. South Bend, IN: St. Augustines Press, 2009.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones quodlibetales. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1949.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super Libros Sententiarum. Edited by Fretté, S. E. and Maré, P.. Vols. 7–11 of Opera omnia. Paris: Vivès, 1882–1889.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra gentiles. 3 vols. Turin and Rome: Marietti, 1961–1967. [English translation: On the Truth of the Catholic Faith: Summa Contra Gentiles. 4 vols. Translated by Anton C. Pegis et al. Garden City, New York: Image Books, 1955–1957.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae. Rome: Editiones Paulinae, 1962. [English translation: Summa Theologica. 3 vols. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benzinger Bros., 1946.]Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Super librum De causis expositio. Edited by Saffrey, H. D., Fribourg and Louven: Société Philosophique, 1954. [English translation: Commentary on the Book of Causes. Translated and annotated by Vincent A. Guagliardo, O.P., Charles R. Hess, O.P., and Richard C. Taylor. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996.]Google Scholar

Arintero, Juan. La Evolución y la filosofía cristiana: Introducción general y Libro primero, La evolución y la mutabilidad de las especies orgánicas. Madrid: Gregorio del Amo, 1898.Google Scholar

Aristotle. De anima (On the Soul), translated by J. A. Smith. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard, 533–603. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar

Aristotle. De generatione animalium (On the Generation of Animals), translated by Arthur Platt. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard, 665–80. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar

Aristotle. De generatione et corruptione (On Generation and Corruption), translated by Harold H. Joachim. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard, 465–531. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar

Aristotle. De partibus animalium (On the Parts of Animals), translated by William Ogle. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard, 641–61. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar

Aristotle. Historia animalium (The History of Animals), translated by D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 1, edited by Barnes, Jonathan, 774–993. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Aristotle. Metaphysica (The Metaphysics), translated by W. D. Ross. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard, 681–926. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar

Aristotle. Meteorologica (The Meteorology), translated by W. Webster. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 1, edited by Barnes, Jonathan, 555–625. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Aristotle. Physica (The Physics), translated by R. K Gaye. In The Basic Works of Aristotle, edited by McKeon, Richard, 213–394. New York: The Modern Library, 2001.Google Scholar

Artigas, Mariano. The Mind of the Universe: Understanding Science and Religion. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Artigas, Mariano, Glick, Thomas F., and Martínez, Rafael A.. Negotiating Darwin: The Vatican Confronts Evolution, 1877–1902. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Artmann, Stefan. “Biological Information.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Sarkar, Sahotra and Plutynski, Anya, 22–39. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar

Ashley, Benedict M. “Causality and Evolution.” The Thomist 36, no. 2 (1972): 199–230.Google Scholar

Ashley, Benedict M. Theologies of the Body: Humanist and Christian. St. Louis: Pope John Center, 1985.Google Scholar

Attfield, Robin. Creation, Evolution and Meaning. Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar

Augustine. The Literal Meaning of Genesis. Vol. 1–2. Translated by John Hammond Taylor. New York: Newman Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Austin, Christopher J. “Aristotelian Essentialism: Essence in the Age of Evolution.” Synthese 194, no. 7 (2017): 2539–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, Christopher J. “Contemporary Hylomorphisms: On the Matter of Form.” Ancient Philosophy Today 2, no. 2 (2020): 113–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, Christopher J. Essence in the Age of Evolution: A New Theory of Natural Kinds. New York: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar

Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio. “Defending Adam After Darwin: On the Origin of Sapiens as a Natural Kind.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92, no. 2 (2018): 337–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio. “The Fittingness of Evolutionary Creation.” In Thomistic Evolution: A Catholic Approach to Understanding Evolution in the Light of Faith, edited by Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco, James Brent, Thomas Davenport, and John Baptist Ku. 182–91. Tacoma, WA: Cluny Media, 2016.Google Scholar

Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio. “The Historicity of Adam and Eve IV: A Theological Synthesis.” In Thomistic Evolution: A Catholic Approach to Understanding Evolution in the Light of Faith, edited by Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco, James Brent, Thomas Davenport, and John Baptist Ku. 171–75. Tacoma, WA: Cluny Media, 2016.Google Scholar

Austriaco, Nicanor Pier Giorgio, Brent, James, Davenport, Thomas, and Baptist Ku, John. Thomistic Evolution: A Catholic Approach to Understanding Evolution in the Light of Faith. Tacoma, WA: Cluny Media, 2016.Google Scholar

Ayala, Francisco J. “Teleological Explanations.” In Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ruse, Michael, 187–95. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1989.Google Scholar

Ayala, Francisco J. “Teleological Explanations in Evolutionary Biology.” In Nature’s Purposes: Analyses of Function and Design in Biology, edited by Allen, Colin, Bekoff, Marc, and Lauder, George, 29–49. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1998.Google Scholar

Bacon, Francis. The Dignity and Advancement of Learning. London and New York: The Colonial Press, 1900.Google Scholar

Baglow, Christopher. “Evolution and the Human Soul.” Church Life Journal. https://churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/evolution-and-the-human-soul/. Retrieved 16 April 2022.Google Scholar

Balme, David M. “Aristotle’s Biology Was Not Essentialist.” In Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, edited by Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James G., 287–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Balsas, Álvaro. Divine Action and the Laws of Nature: An Approach Based on the Concept of Causality Consonant with Contemporary Science. Braga: Axioma, 2018.Google Scholar

Barrett, Paul H., ed. The Collected Papers of Charles Darwin: Two Volume Set. 1st ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Basil the Great. De hominis structura. In Patrologia Graeca. Vol. 30. Paris: Migne, 1888.Google Scholar

Baedke, Jan, and Gilbert, Scott F.. “Evolution and Development.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Fall 2021. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/evolution-development/. Retrieved 20 July 2022.Google Scholar

Beatty, John. “Speaking of Species: Darwin’s Strategy.” In The Darwinian Heritage, edited by Kohn, David, 265–82. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Bedau, Mark. “Where’s the Good in Teleology?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52, no. 4 (1992): 781–806.Google Scholar

Beebee, Helen, and Sabbarton-Leary, Nigel, eds. The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. New York: Routledge, 2010.Google Scholar

Benzinger. Enchiridion Symbolorum, 43rd Ed. Edited by Hünermann, Peter. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bergson, Henri. Creative Evolution. Translated by Arthur Mitchel. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1911.Google Scholar

Berry, R. J., and Noble, T. A., eds. Darwin, Creation and the Fall: Theological Challenges. Nottingham: Intervarsity Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bethell, Tom. “Darwin’s Mistake.” Harper’s 252, no. 1509 (1976): 70–75.Google Scholar

Binswanger, Harry. The Biological Basis of Teleological Concepts. Los Angeles, CA: TOF Publications, Inc., 1990.Google Scholar

Blanchette, Oliva. The Perfection of the Universe According to Aquinas: A Teleological Cosmology. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Blandino, Giovanni S. Deux Hypotheses Sur L’Origine De L’Homme. Observations Theologiquese Et Scientifiques. Bologna: Assoguidi, 1962.Google Scholar

Bostock, David. Space, Time, Matter, and Form: Essays on Aristotle’s “Physics”. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Boulter, Stephen J. “Can Evolutionary Biology Do Without Aristotelian Essentialism?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 70 and 71 (2012): 83–103.Google Scholar

Boulter, Stephen J. “Evolution and the Principle of Proportionality.” In Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics and the Theology of Nature, edited by Simpson, William M. R., Koons, Robert C., and Orr, James, 125–48. New York: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar

Bouyssonie, Jean and Amédée, Bouyssonie. “Polygénisme.” Dictionnaire de théologie catholique 12, no. 2 (1935): col. 2536.Google Scholar

Bowler, Peter J. Evolution: The History of an Idea, 25th Anniversary Edition, With a New Preface. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Bowler, Peter J., and Henry, John. “Evolution.” In Science and Religion: A Historical Introduction, edited by Ferngren, Gary B., 2nd ed., 204–19. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Boyd, Richard. “Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 141–85. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar

Braillard, Pierre-Alain, and Malaterre, Christophe, eds. Explanation in Biology: An Enquiry into the Diversity of Explanatory Patterns in the Life Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar

Brandon, Robert N. Adaptation and Environment. Princeton, NJ and Chichester: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Brandon, Robert N. “Biological Teleology: Questions and Explanations.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 12, no. 2 (June 1, 1981): 91–105.Google Scholar

Brandon, Robert N., and Ramsey, Grant. “What’s Wrong with the Emergentist Statistical Interpretation of Natural Selection and Random Drift.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Hull, David L. and Ruse, Michael, 66–84. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Brower, Jeffrey E. Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Brown, Christopher. Aquinas and the Ship of Theseus: Solving Puzzles about Material Objects. London: Continuum, 2005.Google Scholar

Brown, David O. “St. George Jackson Mivart: Evo-Devo, Epigenetics and Thomism.” Theology and Science 20, no. 4 (2022): 474–92.Google Scholar

Butler, Samuel. Evolution: Old and New. London: Boque, 1882.Google Scholar

Byl, Simon. “Le Jugement de Darwin Sur Aristote.” L’Antiquité Classique 42, no. 2 (1973): 519–21.Google Scholar

Campbell, Joseph Keim, O’Rourke, Michael, and Slater, Matthew H., eds. Carving Nature at Its Joints: Natural Kinds in Metaphysics and Science. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, 2011.Google Scholar

Campbell, Richard. The Metaphysics of Emergence. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.Google Scholar

Carl, Brian T. “Thomas Aquinas on the Proportionate Causes of Living Species.” Scientia et Fides 8, no. 2 (2020): 223–48.Google Scholar

Carroll, William E. “At the Mercy of Chance? Evolution and the Catholic Tradition.” Revue Des Questions Scientifiques 177, no. 2 (2006): 179–204.Google Scholar

Caruana, Louis, ed. Darwin and Catholicism: The Past and Present Dynamics of a Cultural Encounter. London and New York: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar

Catholic Church. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd edition. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2000.Google Scholar

Catholic News Agency. “Francis Inaugurates Bust of Benedict, Emphasizes Unity of Faith, Science,” www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/francis-inaugurates-bust-of-benedict-emphasizes-stewardship-43494. Retrieved 9 January 2021.Google Scholar

Cavanaugh, William T., and Smith, James K. A., eds. Evolution and the Fall. Grand Rapids, MI: William. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar

Centore, Floyd. F. “Darwin on Evolution: A Re-Estimation.” The Thomist 33, no. 3 (1969): 456–96.Google Scholar

Centore, Floyd. F. “Evolution after Darwin.” The Thomist 33, no. 4 (1969): 718–36.Google Scholar

Chaberek, Michael. Aquinas and Evolution. Lexington: The Chartwell Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Chaberek, Michael. “Classical Metaphysics and Theistic Evolution: Why Are They Incompatible?” Studia Gilsoniana 8, no. 1 (2019): 47–81.Google Scholar

Chaberek, Michael. Knowledge and Evolution: How Theology, Philosophy, and Science Converge in the Question of Origins. Eugene, OR: Resource Publications, 2021.Google Scholar

Chaberek, Michael. “The Metaphysical Problem for Theistic Evolution: Accidental Change Does Not Generate Substantial Change.” Forum Philosophicum 26, no. 1 (2021): 35–49.Google Scholar

Chaberek, Michael. “Where Do Substantial Forms Come From? – A Polemic with the Theistic Evolution of Mariusz Tabaczek.” Nova et Vetera 21, no. 2 (2023): forthcoming.Google Scholar

Chardin, Pierre Teilhard de. “Fall, Redemption, and Geocentrism.” In Christianity and Evolution, edited by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, translated by René Hague, 36–44. New York: Harcourt, 1971.Google Scholar

Chardin, Pierre Teilhard de. “Note on Some Possible Historical Representations of Original Sin.” In Christianity and Evolution, edited by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, translated by René Hague, 45–55. New York: Harcourt, 1971.Google Scholar

Chardin, Pierre Teilhard de. The Phenomenon of Man. New York: Harper, 1959.Google Scholar

Charlton, William. “Did Aristotle Believe in Prime Matter?” In Physics: Books I and II, by Aristotle, Translated with Introduction and Notes by W. Charlton, 129–45. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Chiu, Lynn. Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: A Review of the Latest Scientific Research, www.templeton.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/EES_Review_FINAL_.pdf. Retrieved 12 January 2023.Google Scholar

Clayton, Philip. God and Contemporary Science. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997.Google Scholar

Clayton, Philip. “Kenotic Trinitarian Panentheism.” Dialog 44, no. 3 (2005): 250–55.Google Scholar

Coffey, Peter. Ontology or the Theory of Being. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1970.Google Scholar

Collins, Francis S. The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief. New York: Free Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Corey, Michael Anthony. Evolution and the Problem of Natural Evil. Lanham (Md.) ; New York ; Oxford: University Press of America, 2000.Google Scholar

Corning, Peter A. “Beyond the Modern Synthesis: A Framework for a More Inclusive Biological Synthesis.” Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology 153 (July 1, 2020): 5–12.Google Scholar

Craig, William Lane. In Quest of the Historical Adam: A Biblical and Scientific Exploration. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2021.Google Scholar

Craver, Carl F. “Functions and Mechanisms: A Perspectivalist View.” In Functions: Selection and Mechanisms, edited by Huneman, Philippe, 133–58. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.Google Scholar

Cummins, Robert. “Functional Analysis.” Journal of Philosophy 72, no. 20 (1975): 741–64.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. “Letter no. 2534.” In Correspondence Project, www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2534.xml. Retrieved 20 July 2021.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. “Letter no. 7273.” In Correspondence Project, www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-7273.xml. Retrieved 20 July 2021.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray, 1859.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. In two volumes – Vol. 1. London: John Murray, 1871.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882. Edited by Barlow, Nora. London: Collins, 1958.Google Scholar

Darwin, Charles, and Mayr, Ernst. On the Origin of Species: A Facsimile of the First Edition. Facsimile ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Darwin, Francis. The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin. Vols. 1–3. London: John Murray, 1887.Google Scholar

Davies, Paul. “Teleology without Teleology: Purpose through Emergent Complexity.” In In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, edited by Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur Robert, 95–108. Grand Rapids, MI / Cambridge, UK: William. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar

Dawes, Gregory W., and Smith, Tiddy. “The Naturalism of the Sciences.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 67 (2018): 22–31.Google Scholar

Dawkins, Richard. River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life. New York: Basic Books/Harper Collins, 1995.Google Scholar

Deane-Drummond, Celia. “In Adam All Die?: Questions at the Boundary of Niche Construction, Community Evolution, and Original Sin.” In Evolution and the Fall, edited by Cavanaugh, William T. and Smith, James K. A., 23–47. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar

De Filippi, Filippo. L’uomo e Le Scimie: Lezione Pubblica Detta in Torino La Sera Dell’11 Gennaio 1864 Da Filippo De Filippi. Milano: G. Daeli, 1864.Google Scholar

De Haan, Daniel. “Nihil dat quod non habet: Thomist Naturalism Contra Supernaturalism on the Origin of Species.” In A Catholic View on Evolution: New Perspectives in Thomistic Philosophy and Theology, ed. by Austriaco, Nicanor (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2023).Google Scholar

Delbrück, Max. “Aristotle-Totle-Totle.” In Of Microbes and Life, edited by Monod, Jacques and Borek, Ernest, 50–55. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Depew, David J. “Aristotelian Teleology and Philosophy of Biology in the Darwinian Era.” In The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology, edited by Connell, Sophia M., New ed., 261–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Depew, David J. “Consequence Etiology and Biological Teleology in Aristotle and Darwin.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39, no. 4 (December 2008): 379–90.Google Scholar

Depew, David J., and Weber, Bruce H.. “Challenging Darwinism: Expanding, Extending, Replacing.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought, edited by Ruse, Michael, 405–11. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Depew, David J., and Weber, Bruce H.. “The Fate of Darwinism: Evolution After the Modern Synthesis.” Biological Theory 6, no. 1 (December 1, 2011): 89–102.Google Scholar

de Queiroz, Kevin. “Different Species Problems and Their Resolution.” BioEssays 27, no. 12 (December 2005): 1263–69.Google Scholar

de Queiroz, Kevin. “Species Concepts and Species Delimitation.” Systematic Biology 56, no. 6 (2007): 879–86.Google Scholar

de Queiroz, Kevin. “Systematics and the Darwinian Revolution.” Philosophy of Science 55, no. 2 (1988): 238–59.Google Scholar

de Queiroz, Kevin. “The General Lineage Concept of Species and the Defining Properties of the Species Category.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 49–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.Google Scholar

de Sinéty, Robert. “Les Preuves et Les Limites Du Transformisme.” Études 127 (1911): 660–93.Google Scholar

de Sinéty, Robert. “Transformisme.” In Dictionnaire Apologétique de La Foi Catholique, edited by D’Alès, . Paris: Gabriel Beauchesne, col. 1793–1848.Google Scholar

Deacon, Terrence W. Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. New York: W. W. Norton, 2012.Google Scholar

Decaen, Christopher. “Elemental Virtual Presence in St. Thomas.” The Thomist 64, no. 2 (2000): 271–300.Google Scholar

Deely, John N. “The Philosophical Dimensions of the Origin of Species. Part I.” The Thomist 33, no. 1 (1969): 75–149.Google Scholar

Deely, John N. “The Philosophical Dimensions of the Origin of Species. Part II.” The Thomist 33, no. 2 (1969): 251–335.Google Scholar

DeKoninck, Charles. “Darwin’s Dilemma.” The Thomist 24, no. 2 (1961): 367–82.Google Scholar

Dembski, William A., and Witt, Jonathan. Intelligent Design Uncensored: An Easy-to-Understand Guide to the Controversy. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2010.Google Scholar

Dembski, William A., and Ruse, Michael, eds. Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Descartes, René. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 2. Translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Devitt, Michael. Biological Essentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. “Defending Intrinsic Biological Essentialism.” Philosophy of Science 88, no. 1 (2021): 67–82.Google Scholar

Devitt, Michael. “Historical Biological Essentialism.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 71 (2018): 1–7.Google Scholar

Devitt, Michael. “Individual Essentialism in Biology.” Biology & Philosophy 33, no. 5 (2018): 1–22.Google Scholar

Devitt, Michael. “Resurrecting Biological Essentialism.” Philosophy of Science 75, no. 3 (2008): 344–82.Google Scholar

Dewan, Lawrence. “The Importance of Substance,” https://maritain.nd.edu/jmc/ti/dewan.htm. Retrieved 19 August 2022.Google Scholar

DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk, McCluskey, Colleen, and Van Dyke, Christina. Aquinas’s Ethics: Metaphysical Foundations, Moral Theory, and Theological Context. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, Theodosius. Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, Theodosius. The Biology of Ultimate Concern. Later Printing edition. New York: The New American Library, 1967.Google Scholar

Dodds, Michael J. “Science, Causality and Divine Action: Classical Principles for Contemporary Challenges.” CTNS Bulletin 21, no. 1 (2001): 3–12.Google Scholar

Dodds, Michael J. The Philosophy of Nature. Oakland, CA: Western Dominican Province, 2010.Google Scholar

Dodds, Michael J. Unlocking Divine Action: Contemporary Science and Thomas Aquinas. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Donceel, Joseph. “Causality and Evolution: A Survey of Some Neo-Scholastic Theories.” New Scholasticism 39, no. 3 (1965): 295–315.Google Scholar

Dorlodot, Henry de. Darwinism and Catholic Thought. New York: Benziger, 1922.Google Scholar

Dorlodot, Henry de. Le Darwinisme Au Point de Vue de l’Orthodoxie Catholique. Brussels: Lovanium, 1921.Google Scholar

Dudley, John. Aristotle’s Concept of Chance: Accidents, Cause, Necessity, and Determinism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Duffy, Stephen J. “Our Hearts of Darkness: Original Sin Revisited.” Theological Studies 49, no. 4 (1988): 597–622.Google Scholar

Dulles, Avrey Robert. “God and Evolution.” First Things 176 (2007): 19–24.Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis. “A New Argument for Intrinsic Biological Essentialism.” Philosophical Quarterly 62, no. 248 (2012): 486–504.Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis. “Is There Still Hope for a Scholastic Ontology of Biological Species?” The Thomist 76, no. 3 (2012): 371–95.Google Scholar

Dupré, John. Humans and Other Animals. Oxford: Clarendon, 2002.Google Scholar

Dupré, John. “On the Impossibility of a Monistic Account of Species.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 3–22. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar

Dupré, John. Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Dupré, John. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Dubarle, Andre-Marie. The Biblical Doctrine of Original Sin. Translated by E. M. Stewart. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1964.Google Scholar

Edwards, Denis. How God Acts: Creation, Redemption, And Special Divine Action. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Edwards, Denis. The God of Evolution: A Trinitarian Theology. New York: Paulist Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Ehrman, Terrence. “Anthropogenesis and the Soul.” Scientia et Fides 8, no. 2 (2020): 173–92.Google Scholar

Elder, Crawford L. “Biological Species Are Natural Kinds.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 46, no. 3 (2008): 339–62.Google Scholar

Elders, Leo J. “The Philosophical and Religious Background of Charles Darwin’s Theory of Evolution.” Doctor Communis 37 (1984): 32–67.Google Scholar

Eldredge, Niles, and Jay Gould, Stephen. “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism.” In Models in Paleobiology, edited by Schopf, T. J. M., 82–115. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Co., 1972.Google Scholar

Ellis, Brian D. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Ellis, Brian D. The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism. Montreal and Ithaca, NY: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, Marc. “Darwin’s Solution to the Species Problem.” Synthese 175, no. 3 (2010): 405–25.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, Marc. “Microbiology and the Species Problem.” Biology & Philosophy 25, no. 4 (2010): 553–68.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, Marc. Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, Marc. “Species.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Fall 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/species/. Retrieved 20 July 2022.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, Marc. “Species and the Linnean Hierarchy.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 285–305. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, Marc. “Species Pluralism and Anti-Realism.” Philosophy of Science 65, no. 1 (1998): 103–20.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, Marc. “Systematics and Taxonomy.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Sarkar, Sahotra and Plutynski, Anya, 99–118. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar

Ereshefsky, Marc, and Matthen, Mohan. “Taxonomy, Polymorphism, and History: An Introduction to Population Structure Theory.” Philosophy of Science 72, no. 1 (2005): 1–21.Google Scholar

Facchini, Fiorenzo. “Man, Origin and Nature.” In Interdisciplinary Encyclopedia of Religion and Science, 2002. http://inters.org/origin-nature-of-man. Retrieved 17 April 2020.Google Scholar

Fáinche, Ryan. “Aquinas and Darwin.” In Darwin and Catholicism: The Past and Present Dynamics of a Cultural Encounter, edited by Caruana, Louis, 43–59. London; New York: T&T Clark, 2009.Google Scholar

Feser, Edward. Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae, 2014.Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Joseph. The Fall and the Ascent of Man: How Genesis Supports Darwin. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2012.Google Scholar

Flaman, Paul J. P. “Evolution, the Origin of Human Persons, and Original Sin: Physical Continuity with an Ontological Leap.” The Heythrop Journal 57, no. 3 (2016): 568–83.Google Scholar

Fowler, Thomas B., and Kuebler, Daniel. The Evolution Controversy: A Survey of Competing Theories. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2007.Google Scholar

Francis, Pope. Laudato Si’: On Care for Our Common Home. Huntington, IN: Our Sunday Visitor, 2015.Google Scholar

Franklin, Laura R. “Bacteria, Sex, and Systematics.” Philosophy of Science 74, no. 1 (2007): 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frost, Gloria. Aquinas on Efficient Causation and Causal Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Gaine, Simon F. “The Teaching of the Catholic Church and the Evolution of Humanity.” In A Catholic View on Evolution: New Perspectives in Thomistic Philosophy and Theology, edited by Austriaco, Nicanor (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2023).Google Scholar

Gage, Logan Paul. “Can a Thomist Be a Darwinist?” In God and Evolution, edited by Richards, Jay W., 187–202. Seattle: Discovery Institute Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald. “Le Monogénisme n’est-Il Nullement Révélé, Pas Même Implicitement?” Doctor Communis 2 (1948): 191–202.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, Michael T. “A Radical Solution to the Species Problem.” Systematic Zoology 23, no. 4 (1974): 536–44.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, Michael T. “Introduction.” In Darwin, Charles, The Various Contrivances by Which Orchids Are Fertilized by Insects, 2nd rev. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, Michael T. “Species Concepts, Individuality, and Objectivity.” Biology and Philosophy 2, no. 2 (1987): 127–43.Google Scholar

Ghiselin, Michael T. The Triumph of the Darwinian Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Giberson, Karl W., ed. Abraham’s Dice: Chance and Providence in the Monotheistic Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Gilbert, S. F., Opitz, J. M., and Raff, R. A.. “Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Developmental Biology.” Developmental Biology 173, no. 2 (1996): 357–72.Google Scholar

Gilson, Étienne. From Aristotle to Darwin and Back Again: A Journey in Final Causality, Species, and Evolution. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Gilson, Étienne. The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by L. K. Shook. New York: Random House, 1956.Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. “A Modern History Theory of Functions.” In Philosophy of Biology: An Anthology, edited by Rosenberg, Alex and Arp, Robert, 175–88. Oxford: Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, Peter, and Sterelny, Kim. “Biological Information.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Summer 2016. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/information-biological/. Retrieved 20 July 2022.Google Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, Peter, and Sterelny, Kim. “Information in Biology.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology, edited by Hull, David L. and Ruse, Michael, 103–19. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

González, Zeferino. La Biblia y La Ciencia. 2nd ed. Seville: Izquierdo, 1892.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Brian. How the Leopard Changed Its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1994.Google Scholar

Gorman, Michael. “Essentiality as Foundationality.” In Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives in Metaphysics, edited by Novotný, Daniel D. and Novák, Lukáš, 119–37. New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, Allan. “Aristotle’s Conception of Final Causality.” Review of Metaphysics 30, no. 2 (1976): 226–54.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, Allan. “Darwin on Aristotle.” Journal of the History of Biology 32, no. 1 (1999): 3–30.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, Allan. Teleology, First Principles, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Gotthelf, Allan, and Lennox, James G., eds. Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Gould, Stephen Jay. The Mismeasure of Man. Revised and Expanded edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1996.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C.. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 205, no. 1161 (September 21, 1979): 581–98.Google Scholar

Graham, William. The Creed of Science: Religious, Moral, and Social. London: Kegan Paul, 1881.Google Scholar

Gray, Asa. “Scientific Worthies.” Nature 10 (1874): 79–81.Google Scholar

Gregersen, Niels Henrik. “Deep Incarnation and Kenosis: In, With, Under, and As: A Response to Ted Peters.” Dialog 52, no. 3 (2013): 251–62.Google Scholar

Grelot, Pierre. Réflexions sur le Problème du Péché Originel. Tournai: Casterman, 1968.Google Scholar

Grene, Marjorie, and Depew, David J.. The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic History. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Griesemer, James. “Origins of Life Studies.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ruse, Michael, 263–90. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Paul E. “Squaring the Circle: Natural Kinds with Historical Essences.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 209–28. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Paul E. “What Is Innateness?” The Monist 85, no. 1 (2001): 70–85.Google Scholar

Grisez, Germain Gabriel. Christian Moral Principles: Way of the Lord Jesus: 1. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Guthrie, William Keith Chambers. A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 6, Aristotle: An Encounter. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Haeckel, Ernst. The History of Creation. Translated by E. Ray Lankester. London: H. S. King and Company, 1876.Google Scholar

HallerJr., John S. Outcasts from Evolution: Scientific Attitudes of Racial Inferiority, 1859 – 1900. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Haught, John F. God After Darwin: A Theology of Evolution. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hayward, Alan. Creation and Evolution: Rethinking the Evidence from Science and the Bible. Ada, Ml: Bethany House Publishers, 1985.Google Scholar

Hefner, Philip J. The Human Factor: Evolution, Culture, and Religion. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G., and Oppenheim, Paul. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 15, no. 2 (1948): 135–75.Google Scholar

Henry, John, and Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Causation.” In Science and Religion: A Historical Introduction, edited by Ferngren, Gary B., 377–94. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Hey, Jody. Genes, Categories, and Species: The Evolutionary and Cognitive Cause of the Species Problem. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Hofmann, James R. “Catholicism and Evolution: Polygenism and Original Sin Part I.” Scientia et Fides 8, no. 2 (2020): 95–138.Google Scholar

Hofmann, James R. “Catholicism and Evolution: Polygenism and Original Sin Part II.” Scientia et Fides 9, no. 1 (2021): 63–129.Google Scholar

Hofmann, James R. “Erich Wasmann, S.J.: Natural Species and Catholic Polyphyletic Evolution during the Modernist Crisis.” Journal of Jesuit Studies 7 (2020): 244–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofmann, James R. “Some Thomistic Encounters with Evolution.” Theology and Science 18, no. 2 (2020): 325–46.Google Scholar

Hofmann, James R. “The Evolving Taxonomy of Progressive Creation.” Scientia et Fides 11, no. 1 (2023): 199–214.Google Scholar

Hofmann, James R. “Thomistic Hylomorphism and Theistic Evolution.” Scientia et Fides 11, no. 2 (2023): forthcoming.Google Scholar

Howerth, I. W. “Natural Selection and the Survival of the Fittest.” The Scientific Monthly 5, no. 3 (1917): 253–57.Google Scholar

Hull, David L. “A Matter of Individuality.” Philosophy of Science 45, no. 3 (1978): 335–60.Google Scholar

Hull, David L. “Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles.” Biology and Philosophy 2, no. 2 (April 1, 1987): 168–84.Google Scholar

Hull, David L. “On the Plurality of Species: Questioning the Party Line.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 23–48. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar

Hull, David L. “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy – Two Thousand Years of Stasis (I-II).” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15–16, no. 60–61 (1965): 314–26, 1–18.Google Scholar

Hull, David L. “What Philosophy of Biology Is Not.” Synthese 20, no. 2 (1969): 157–84.Google Scholar

Hunt, Tam. “Reconsidering the Logical Structure of the Theory of Natural Selection.” Communicative & Integrative Biology 7, no. 6 (2014): e972848.Google Scholar

International Theological Commission. Communion and Stewardship: Human Persons Created in the Image of God. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2004.Google Scholar

Ingman, Max, Kaessmann, Henrik, Pääbo, Svante, and Gyllensten, Ulf. “Mitochondrial Genome Variation and the Origin of Modern Humans.” Nature 408, no. 6813 (December 2000): 708–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Irenaeus. “Against Heresies.” In Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol 1: The Apostolic Fathers, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, edited by Roberts, Alexander and Donaldson, James, 834–1391. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 1885.Google Scholar

Irwin, Terence. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Jablonka, Eva, and Lamb, Marion J.. Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.Google Scholar

John, Paul II. Address to the Plenary Session on ‘The Origins and Early Evolution of Life.’ Rome: Pontifical Academy of Sciences, 1996. www.pas.va/content/accademia/en/magisterium/johnpaulii/22october1996.html. Retrieved 14 June 2021.Google Scholar

John Paul IIAddress to the Symposium ‘Christian Faith and the Theory of Evolution.’ Translated by Paolo Zanna. Rome, 1985, http://inters.org/John-Paul-II-Faith-Evolution-1985. Retrieved 15 May 2021.Google Scholar

John Paul II“Consequences of Original Sin for All Humanity: Catechesis by Pope John Paul II on Jesus Christ.” October 1, 1986, http://totus2us.com/teaching/jpii-catechesis-on-god-the-son-jesus/. Retrieved 12 July 2021.Google Scholar

John Paul IIVeritatis Splendor. Rome, 1993. www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_06081993_veritatis-splendor.html. Retrieved 15 July 2022.Google Scholar

Kaiser, Christopher B. “Early Christian Belief in Creation and the Beliefs Sustaining the Modern Scientific Endeavor.” In The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity, edited by Stump, J. B. and Padgett, Alan G., 3–13. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar

Kampourakis, Kostas, and Minelli, Alessandro. “Understanding Evolution: Why Evo-Devo Matters.” BioScience 64, no. 5 (May 1, 2014): 381–82.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by Guyer, Paul. Translated by Eric Matthews and Paul Guyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Kauffman, Stuart. At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kellert, Stephen H., Longino, Helen E., and Waters, C. Kenneth, eds. Scientific Pluralism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Keltz, B. Kyle. Thomism and the Problem of Animal Suffering. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2020.Google Scholar

Kemp, Kenneth W. “God, Evolution, and the Body of Adam.” Scientia et Fides 8, no. 2 (2020): 139–72.Google Scholar

Kemp, Kenneth W. “Humani Generis & Evolution: A Report from the Archives.” Scintia ef Fides 11, no. 1 (2023): 9–27.Google Scholar

Kemp, Kenneth W. “Science, Theology, and Monogenesis.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85, no. 2 (2011): 217–36.Google Scholar

Kendal, Jeremy, Tehrani, Jamshid J., and Odling-Smee, John. “Human Niche Construction in Interdisciplinary Focus.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366, no. 1566 (2011): 785–92.Google Scholar

Kerr, Gaven. Aquinas and the Metaphysics of Creation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Kimura, Motoo. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

King, Hugh R. “Aristotle without Prima Materia.” Journal of the History of Ideas 17, no. 1/4 (1956): 370–89.Google Scholar

Kitcher, Philip. In Mendel’s Mirror: Philosophical Reflections on Biology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Kitcher, Philip. “Species.” Philosophy of Science 51, no. 2 (1984): 308–33.Google Scholar

Kitts, David B., and Kitts, David J.. “Biological Species as Natural Kinds.” Philosophy of Science 46, no. 4 (1979): 613–22.Google Scholar

Klubertanz, George P. “Causality and Evolution.” Modern Schoolman 19, no. 1 (1941): 11–14.Google Scholar

Kohn, David. “Darwin’s Keystone: The Principle of Divergence.” In The Cambridge Companion to the “Origin of Species”, edited by Ruse, Michael and Richards, Robert J., 87–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Kopf, Simon Maria. Reframing Providence: New Perspectives from Aquinas on the Divine Action Debate. New York: Oxford University Press, 2023.Google Scholar

Kretzmann, Norman. The Metaphysics of Creation: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles II. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul A. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Lamoureux, Denis O. Evolutionary Creation: A Christian Approach to Evolution. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2008.Google Scholar

Lamoureux, Denis O. “Evolutionary Creation: Moving Beyond the Evolution Versus Creation Debate.” Christian Higher Education 9, no. 1 (2009): 28–48.Google Scholar

Lang, David P. “The Thomistic Doctrine of Prime Matter.” Laval Théologique et Philosophique 54, no. 2 (1998): 367–85.Google Scholar

LaPorte, Joseph. Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Lawlor, Leonard, and Moulard Leonard, Valentine. “Henri Bergson.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Summer 2016. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/bergson/. Retrieved 17 April 2020.Google Scholar

Lennox, James G. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Lennox, James G. “Darwin Was a Teleologist.” Biology and Philosophy 8 (1993): 409–21.Google Scholar

Leo XIII, . Aeterni Patris: On the Restoration of Christian Philosophy. Rome, 1879. www.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_04081879_aeterni-patris.html. Retrieved 12 June 2021.Google Scholar

Leroy, Marie-Dalmace. L’évolution Restreinte Aux Espèces Organiques. Paris: Delhomme et Briguet, 1891.Google Scholar

Levada, William Joseph, Auletta, Gennaro, Leclerc, Marc, and Martínez, Rafael A., eds. Biological Evolution: Facts and Theories: A Critical Appraisal 150 Years after “The Origin of Species”. Analecta Gregoriana 312. Roma: Gregorian & Biblical Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Lickliter, Robert. “Developmental Evolution.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science 8, no. 1–2 (2017).Google Scholar

Livingstone, David N. Adam’s Ancestors: Race, Religion, and the Politics of Human Origins. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Livingstone, David N. Dealing with Darwin: Place, Politics, and Rhetoric in Religious Engagements with Evolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Lombardo, Nicholas E. “Evolutionary Genetics and Theological Narratives of Human Origins.” The Heythrop Journal 59, no. 3 (2018): 523–33.Google Scholar

Luyten, N. “Evolutionisme En Wijsbegeerte.” Tijdschrift Voor Philosophie 16, no. 1 (1954): 3–36.Google Scholar

Luyten, N. “The Philosophical Implications of Evolution.” The New Scholasticism 25 (1951): 290–312.Google Scholar

Macbeth, Norman. Darwin Retried: An Appeal to Reason. Boston: Gambit, 1971.Google Scholar

Mackie, John Leslie. “Evil and Omnipotence.” Mind 64, no. 254 (1955): 200–12.Google Scholar

Madden, James D. Mind, Matter, and Nature: A Thomistic Proposal for the Philosophy of Mind. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Madueme, Hans. “‘The Most Vulnerable Part of the Whole Christian Account’: Original Sin and Modern Science.” In Adam, the Fall, and Original Sin: Theological, Biblical, and Scientific Perspectives, edited by Madueme, Hans and Reeves, Michael, 225–49. Grand Rapid, MI: Baker Academic, 2014.Google Scholar

Magnus, P. D. Scientific Enquiry and Natural Kinds: From Planets to Mallards. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.Google Scholar

Mallet, James. “Mayr’s View of Darwin: Was Darwin Wrong about Speciation?” Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 95, no. 1 (2008): 3–16.Google Scholar

Maritain, Jacques. “On the Philosophy of Nature (I): Toward a Thomist Idea of Evolution.” In Untrammeled Approaches, 85–131. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Maritain, Jacques. The Range of Reason. New York: Scribner, 1952.Google Scholar

Massie, Pascal. “The Irony of Chance: On Aristotle’s Physics B, 4–6.” International Philosophical Quarterly 43, no. 1 (2003): 15–28.Google Scholar

Matthen, Mohan. “Biological Universals and the Nature of Fear.” The Journal of Philosophy 95, no. 3 (1998): 105–32.Google Scholar

Mayden, Richard L. “A Hierarchy of Species Concepts: The Denouement in the Saga of the Species Problem.” In Species: The Units of Biodiversity, edited by Claridge, M. F., Dawah, A. H., and Wilson, M. R., 381–424. London and New York: Springer, 1997.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. Evolution and the Diversity of Life: Selected Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. Populations, Species, and Evolution, An Abridgment of Animal Species and Evolution. Abridged ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. “Teleological and Teleonomic: A New Analysis.” In Evolution and the Diversity of Life: Selected Essays, 383–404. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. “The Multiple Meanings of Teleological.” In Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist, 38–66. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology: Observations of an Evolutionist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. “Typological Versus Population Thinking.” In Evolution and Anthropology: A Centennial Appraisal, edited by Meggers, Betty J., 409–12. Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington, 1959.Google Scholar

Mayr, Ernst. What Evolution Is. London: Phoenix, 2002.Google Scholar

McIver, Tom. “Formless and Void: Gap Theory Creationism.” Creation/Evolution Journal 8, no. 3 (1988): 1–24.Google Scholar

McMahon, Kevin. “Monogenism and Polygenism.” In New Catholic Encyclopedia, 2003. www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/monogenism-and-polygenism. Retrieved 21 June 2021.Google Scholar

McMullin, Ernan. “Introduction: Evolution and Creation.” In Evolution and Creation, edited by McMullin, Ernan, 1–56. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Melsen, Andreas Gerardus Maria van. The Philosophy of Nature. 3rd ed. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Messenger, Ernest C. Evolution and Theology: The Problem of Man’s Origin. New York: Macmillan, 1932.Google Scholar

Messenger, Ernest C. Theology and Evolution. London: Sands & Co., 1951.Google Scholar

Miller, Kenneth R. Finding Darwin’s God: A Scientist’s Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution. New York: Cliff Street Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Millikan, Ruth Garrett. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Millikan, Ruth Garrett. On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay about Substance Concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Mishler, Brent D. “Getting Rid of Species?” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 307–15. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar

Mivart, St George Jackson. “Darwin’s Brilliant Fallacy.” The Forum 7 (1889): 99–105.Google Scholar

Mivart, St George Jackson. On the Genesis of Species. New York: D. Appleton & Company, 1871.Google Scholar

Molnar, George. Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Edited by Mumford, Stephen. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Monod, Jacques. Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. Translated by Austryn Wainhouse. New York: Vintage Books, 1970.Google Scholar

Morales, José. Creation Theology. Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Morange, Michel. “Is There an Explanation for … the Diversity of Explanations in Biological Studies?” In Explanation in Biology: An Enquiry into the Diversity of Explanatory Patterns in the Life Sciences, edited by Braillard, Pierre-Alain and Malaterre, Christophe, 31–46. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar

Moreno, Alvaro, and Mossio, Matteo. Biological Autonomy: A Philosophical and Theoretical Enquiry. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar

Moreno, Antonio. “Finality and Intelligibility in Biological Evolution.” The Thomist 54, no. 1 (1990): 1–31.Google Scholar

Moreno, Antonio. “Some Philosophical Considerations on Biological Evolution.” The Thomist 37, no. 3 (1973): 417–54.Google Scholar

Moss, Lenny, and Nicholson, Daniel J.. “On Nature and Normativity: Normativity, Teleology, and Mechanism in Biological Explanation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43, no. 1 (2012): 88–91.Google Scholar

Muller, Camille. “L’Encyclique ‘Humani Generis’ et Les Problèmes Scientifiques.” Synthèses; Revue Mensuelle International 5, no. 57 (1951): 296–312.Google Scholar

Muller, Earl. “Evolution.” In New Catholic Encyclopedia, Supplement 2009, A-I. Detroit: Gale in association with The Catholic University of America, 2010.Google Scholar

NABRE: New American Bible Revised Edition. Charlottesville, VA: Saint Benedict Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Nagel, Ernst. “Types of Causal Explanation in Science.” In Cause and Effect, edited by Lerner, Daniel, 11–32. New York: Free Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Neander, Karen. “Functions as Selected Effects: The Conceptual Analyst’s Defense.” Philosophy of Science 58, no. 2 (1991): 168–84.Google Scholar

Nicholson, Daniel J., and Dupré, John. Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Nicolas, M. J. Evolution et Christianisme. De Teilhard de Chardin à Saint Thomas d’Aquin. Paris: Fayard, 1973.Google Scholar

Nogar, Raymond J. “From the Fact of Evolution to the Philosophy of Evolutionism.” The Thomist 24, no. 2 (1961): 463–501.Google Scholar

Nogar, Raymond J. The Wisdom of Evolution. New York: Doubleday, 1963.Google Scholar

Nosil, Patrik, Feder, Jeffrey L., and Gompert, Zachariah. “How Many Genetic Changes Create New Species?” Science 371, no. 6531 (2021): 777–79.Google Scholar

Novo, Francisco J. “The Theory of Evolution in the Writings of Joseph Ratzinger.” Scientia et Fides 8, no. 2 (2020): 323–49.Google Scholar

Numbers, Ronald L. The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design, Expanded Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Oakes, Edward T. “Dominican Darwinism: Evolution in Thomist Philosophy After Darwin.” The Thomist 77, no. 3 (2013): 333–65.Google Scholar

Oderberg, David S. Real Essentialism. New York: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar

O’Hara, Robert J. “Systematic Generalization, Historical Fate, and the Species Problem.” Systematic Biology 42, no. 3 (1993): 231–46.Google Scholar

Okasha, Samir. “Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism.” Synthese 131, no. 2 (2002): 191–213.Google Scholar

O’Leary, Don. Roman Catholicism and Modern Science: A History. New York: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar

Olson, Richard G. Science and Religion, 1450–1900: From Copernicus to Darwin. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2004.Google Scholar

O’Malley, Maureen. Philosophy of Microbiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

O’Malley, Maureen, and Dupré, John. “Size Doesn’t Matter: Towards a More Inclusive Philosophy of Biology.” Biology and Philosophy 22, no. 2 (2007): 155–91.Google Scholar

O’Rourke, Fran. “Aristotle and the Metaphysics of Evolution.” The Review of Metaphysics 58, no. 1 (2004): 3–59.Google Scholar

Orr, H. Allen. “Is Single-Gene Speciation Possible?” Evolution 45, no. 3 (1991): 764–69.Google Scholar

Paley, William. Natural Theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. London: R. Faulder, 1802.Google Scholar

Paro, Renato, Grossniklaus, Ueli, Santoro, Raffaella, and Wutz, Anton. Introduction to Epigenetics. Berlin: Springer, 2021.Google Scholar

Pasnau. Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Paul VI, Pope. “Original Sin and Modern Science: Address to Participants in A Symposium on Original Sin,” The Pope Speaks 11, no. 3 (1966): 229–35 (translated from the Italian L’Osservatore Romano, 11 July 1966, by Rev. Austin Vaughan).Google Scholar

Peacocke, Arthur. “Articulating God’s Presence in and to the World Unveiled by the Sciences.” In In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, edited by Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur Robert, 137–54. Grand Rapids, MI / Cambridge, UK: William. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2004.Google Scholar

Peacocke, Arthur. “Biological Evolution – A Positive Theological Appraisal.” In Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, edited by Russell, Robert J., Stoeger, William R., and Ayala, Francisco José, 357–76. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1998.Google Scholar

Peacocke, Arthur. Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming – Natural, Divine, and Human. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993.Google Scholar

Pendergast, Richard. “Evil, Original Sin, and Evolution.” The Heythrop Journal 50, no. 5 (2009): 833–45.Google Scholar

Pennisi, Elizabeth. “Evo-Devo Enthusiasts Get Down to Details.” Science 298, no. 5595 (November 1, 2002): 953–55.Google Scholar

Pennock, Robert T. Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics: Philosophical, Theological, and Scientific Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 2001.Google Scholar

Perlman, Mark. “The Modern Philosophical Resurrection of Teleology.” In Philosophy of Biology: An Anthology, edited by Rosenberg, Alex and Arp, Robert, 149–63. Oxford: Blackwell, 2010.Google Scholar

Peters, Ted, and Hewlett, Martin. Evolution from Creation to New Creation: Conflict, Conversation, and Convergence. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Peterson, Daniel J. “The Kenosis of the Father: Affirming God’s Action at the Higher Levels of Nature.” Theology and Science 11, no. 4 (2013): 451–54.Google Scholar

Phillips, Richard Percival. Modern Thomistic Philosophy: An Explanation for Students. Volume 1: The Philosophy of Nature. Reprint of the second reprinted edition (1962). Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae, 2013.Google Scholar

Pittendrigh, Colin S. “Adaptation, Natural Selection and Behavior.” In Behavior and Evolution, edited by Roe, Anne and Simpson, George Gaylord, 390–419. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1958.Google Scholar

Pius XII., Humani Generis. Rome, 1950. www.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis.html. Retrieved 23 May 2021.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. God, Freedom, and Evil. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1977.Google Scholar

Polkinghorne, John C. “Kenotic Creation and Divine Action.” In The Work of Love: Creation as Kenosis, edited by Polkinghorne, J. C., 90–106. Grand Rapids, MI / Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar

Pontifical Academy of Sciences. “Statement by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on Current Scientific Knowledge on Cosmic Evolution and Biological Evolution.” In Scientific Insights into the Evolution of the Universe and of Life, edited by Arber, Werner, Cabibbo, Nicola, and Sorondo, Marcelo Sanchez, 583–86. Vatican City: Pontificia Academia Scientiarum, 2009.Google Scholar

Portalié, Eugène. A Guide to the Thought of St. Augustine. Chicago, IL: Regnery Publishing 1960.Google Scholar

Porter, Alan M. W. “Do Animals Have Souls? An Evolutionary Perspective.” The Heythrop Journal 54, no. 4 (2013): 533–42.Google Scholar

Pruss, Alexander R. “God, Chance and Evolution. In Memory of Benjamin Arbour.” In Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics and the Theology of Nature, edited by Simpson, William M. R., Koons, Robert C., and Orr, James, 364–82. New York: Routledge, 2022.Google Scholar

Pušić, Bruno, Gregorić, Pavel, and Franjević, Damjan. “What Do Biologists Make of the Species Problem?” Acta Biotheoretica 65, no. 3 (2017): 179–209.Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’” In Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, edited by Hilary Putnam, 215–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In From a Logical Point of View, edited by Willard Van Orman Quine, 20–46. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl. “Evolution and Original Sin.” Concilium 26, no. 6 (1967): 61–73.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl. Foundations of Christian Faith: An Introduction to the Idea of Christianity. New York: Crossroad, 1978.Google Scholar

Rahner, Karl. “Theological Reflections on Monogenism.” In Theological Investigations. Vol. I, translated by Cornelius Ernst, 229–96. Baltimore: Helicon, 1961.Google Scholar

Ramage, Matthew J. From the Dust of the Earth: Benedict XVI, the Bible, and the Theory of Evolution. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 2022.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Ian T. Models for Divine Activity. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2011.Google Scholar

Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. “Belief in Creation and the Theory of Evolution.” In Dogma and Preaching, edited by Joseph Ratzinger, 131–42. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Eschatology: Death and Eternal Life. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Introduction to Christianity. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Schöpfungslehre [unpublished Freising lecture notes], 1958.Google Scholar

Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. Schöpfungslehre [unpublished Freising lecture notes], 1964.Google Scholar

Ratzinger, Joseph Cardinal. The Spirit of the Liturgy. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas. Process Metaphysics: An Introduction to Process Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Revol, Fabien. “The Concept of Continuous Creation Part I: History and Contemporary Use.” Zygon 55, no. 1 (2020): 229–50.Google Scholar

Richards, Richard A. “Species and Taxonomy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ruse, Michael, 161–88. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Richards, Richard A. The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Rieppel, Olivier. “New Essentialism in Biology.” Philosophy of Science 77, no. 5 (2010): 662–73.Google Scholar

Robert, Jason Scott. “Evo-Devo.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ruse, Michael, 291–309. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Robinson, H. M. “Prime Matter in Aristotle.” Phronesis 19, no. 2 (1974): 168–88.Google Scholar

Rondet, Henri. Original Sin: The Patristic and Theological Background. Staten Island, NY: Alba House, 1972.Google Scholar

Rosen, Robert. Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Alexander. Instrumental Biology, or The Disunity of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Alexander. The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Alexander, and Bouchard, Frederic. “Fitness.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, (Spring 2020 Edition), 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=fitness&archive=spr2020. Retrieved 20 July 2022.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Alex, and McShea, Daniel W.. Philosophy of Biology: A Contemporary Introduction. New York, NY: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Ross, Hugh. A Matter of Days: Resolving a Creation Controversy. Colorado Springs: NavPress, 2004.Google Scholar

Ruse, Michael. “Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals, or What?” In The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, edited by Ereshefsky, Marc, 343–62. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1992.Google Scholar

Ruse, Michael. Darwin and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Ruse, Michael. Taking Darwin Seriously: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1998.Google Scholar

Ruse, Michael. The Philosophy of Human Evolution. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Russell, Robert John. Cosmology from Alpha to Omega: The Creative Mutual Interaction of Theology and Science. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2008.Google Scholar

Russell, Robert John. “Special Providence and Genetic Mutation: A New Defense of Theistic Evolution.” In Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, edited by Russell, Robert J., Stoeger, William R., and Ayala, Francisco José, 191–223. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & CTNS, 1998.Google Scholar

Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey C., and Isham, C.J., eds. Quantum Cosmology and the Laws of Nature: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & CTNS, 1993.Google Scholar

Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey C., Meyering, Theo C., and Arbib, Michael A., eds. Neuroscience and the Person: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & CTNS, 1999.Google Scholar

Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey C., and Robert Peacocke, Arthur, eds. Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & CTNS, 2000.Google Scholar

Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey C., and Stoeger, William R., eds. Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action: Twenty Years of Challenge and Progress. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & CTNS, 2008.Google Scholar

Russell, Robert J., Clayton, Philip, Wegter-McNelly, Kirk, and Polkinghorne, John, eds. Quantum Mechanics: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 2001.Google Scholar

Russell, Robert J., Stoeger, William R., and José Ayala, Francisco, eds. Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & CTNS, 1998.Google Scholar

Sanz Sánchez, Santiago. “La Dottrina Della Creazione Nelle Lezioni Del Professor Joseph Ratzinger: Gli Appunti Di Freising (1958).” Annales Theologici 30, no. 1 (2016): 11–44.Google Scholar

Saunders, Nicholas. Divine Action and Modern Science. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Scheffczyk, Leo. Schwerpunkte des Glaubens: Gesammelte Schriften zur Theologie. Einsiedeln: Johannes-Verlag [Auslfg. Benziger], 1977.Google Scholar

Schmaus, Michael. Dogma: God and Creation. London: Sheed and Ward, 1969.Google Scholar

Schoonenberg, Piet. “Erbsünde und ‘Sünde der Welt’.” Orientierung: Katholische Blätter für weltanschauliche Information 6, no. 6 (1962): 65–69.Google Scholar

Schoonenberg, Piet. Man and Sin: A Theological View by Piet Schoonenberg. Translated by Joseph Donceel. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Schönborn, Christoph Cardinal. Chance or Purpose? Creation, Evolution and a Rational Faith. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Schreiner, Thomas R. “Original Sin and Original Death: Romans 5:12–19.” In Adam, the Fall, and Original Sin: Theological, Biblical, And Scientific Perspectives, edited by Madueme, Hans and Reeves, Michael, 271–88. Grand Rapid, MI: Baker Academic, 2014.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Gerald. Genesis and the Big Bang Theory: The Discovery of Harmony Between Modern Science and The Bible. New York: Bantam Books, 1990.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, Erwin. What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1944.Google Scholar

Schwager, Raymund. Banished from Eden: Original Sin and Evolutionary Theory in the Drama of Salvation. Herefordshire: Gracewing Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar

Scott, Eugenie Carol. Evolution Vs. Creationism: An Introduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Scott, Eugenie Carol. “The Creation/Evolution Continuum.” In National Center for Science Education, 2016. https://ncse.ngo/creationevolution-continuum. Retrieved 17 April 2020.Google Scholar

Second Vatican Council, Gaudium et Spes (Rome, 1965), www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_en.html. Retrieved 15 may 2021.Google Scholar

Seibt, Johanna, ed. Process Theories: Crossdisciplinary Studies in Dynamic Categories. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic, 2003.Google Scholar

Silva, Ignacio. “A Cause Among Causes? God Acting in the Natural World.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7, no. 4 (2015): 99–114.Google Scholar

Silva, Ignacio. “Divine Action and Thomism: Why Thomas Aquinas’s Thought Is Attractive Today.” Acta Philosophica 25, no. 1 (2016): 65–84.Google Scholar

Silva, Ignacio. Providence and Science in a World of Contingency: Thomas Aquinas’ Metaphysics of Divine Action. New York: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar

Silva, Ignacio. “Revisiting Aquinas on Providence and Rising to the Challenge of Divine Action in Nature.” Journal of Religion 94, no. 3 (2014): 277–91.Google Scholar

Silva, Ignacio. “Thomas Aquinas Holds Fast: Objections to Aquinas within Today’s Debate on Divine Action.” Heythrop Journal 48, no. 1 (2011): 1–10.Google Scholar

Simpson, George Gaylord. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Skrzypek, Jeremy. “Three Concerns for Structural Hylomorphism.” Analytic Philosophy 58, no. 4 (2017): 360–408.Google Scholar

Smit, Harry. “Darwin’s Rehabilitation of Teleology Versus Williams’ Replacement of Teleology by Natural Selection.” Biological Theory 5, no. 4 (2010): 357–65.Google Scholar

Smith, John Maynard, and Szathmary, Eors. The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origin of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Snyder, Steven. “Evolution and the Origin of Species: Aristotelian Reflections.” https://maritain.nd.edu/jmc/ti/snyder.htm. Retrieved 19 August 2022.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott. “Evolution, Population Thinking and Essentialism.” Philosophy of Science 47, no. 3 (1980): 350–83.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott. Philosophy of Biology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott. “Sets, Species, and Evolution: Comments on Philip Kitcher’s ‘Species.’” Philosophy of Science 51, no. 2 (1984): 334–41.Google Scholar

Solinas, M. From Aristotle’s Teleology to Darwin’s Genealogy: The Stamp of Inutility. Translated by James Douglas. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015.Google Scholar

Sollereder, Bethany N. God, Evolution, and Animal Suffering: Theodicy without a Fall. New York: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar

Solmsen, Friedrich. “Aristotle and Prime Matter: A Reply to Hugh R. King.” Journal of the History of Ideas 19, no. 2 (1958): 243–52.Google Scholar

Southgate, Christopher, ed. God, Humanity and the Cosmos – 3rd Edition: A Textbook in Science and Religion. London and New York: T & T Clark, 2011.Google Scholar

Southgate, Christopher, The Groaning of Creation: God, Evolution, and the Problem of Evil. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedict. “Ethics.” In The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza. Vol. 2, translated by Robert Harvey Monro Elwes, 43–271. New York: Dover Publications, 1951.Google Scholar

Stamos, David N. The Species Problem, Biological Species, Ontology, and the Metaphysics of Biology. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2004.Google Scholar

Sterelny, Kim. “Species as Ecological Mosaics.” In Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, edited by Wilson, Robert A., 119–38. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, 1999.Google Scholar

Sterelny, Kim, and Griffiths, Paul E.. Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Stipe, Claude E. “Scientific Creationism and Evangelical Christianity.” American Anthropologist 87, no. 1 (1985): 148–50.Google Scholar

Stoeger, William R. “Contemporary Physics and the Ontological Status of the Laws of Nature.” In Quantum Mechanics: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, edited by Russell, Robert J., Clayton, Philip, Wegter-McNelly, Kirk, and Polkinghorne, John, 207–31. Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory & Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 2001.Google Scholar

Storck, Michael Hector. “Parts, Wholes, and Presence by Power: A Response to Gordon P. Barnes.” The Review of Metaphysics 62, no. 1 (2008): 45–59.Google Scholar

Stump, Eleonore. Aquinas. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar

Suarez, Antoine. “‘Transmission at Generation’: Could Original Sin Have Happened at the Time When Homo Sapiens Already Had a Large Population Size?” Scientia et Fides 4, no. 1 (April 26, 2016): 253–94.Google Scholar

Suarez, Francisco. Opera Omnia, Vol. 25. Edited by Berton, Carolo. Paris: Louis Vivès, 1861.Google Scholar

Swamidass, S. Joshua. The Genealogical Adam and Eve: The Surprising Science of Universal Ancestry. Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2021.Google Scholar

Swamidass, S. Joshua. “The Misunderstood Science of Genetic Bottlenecks.” Peaceful Science, July 29, 2022. https://doi.org/10.54739/1w7j.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Afterword to the Polish Edition of Thomistic Evolution: A Catholic Approach to Understanding Evolution in the Light of Faith by Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco, O.P., James Brent, O.P., Thomas Davenport, O.P., and John Baptist Ku, O.P.” Nova et Vetera 21, no. 2 (2023): forthcoming.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. “An Aristotelian Account of Evolution and the Contemporary Philosophy of Biology.” In The 1st Virtual International Conference on the Dialogue between Science and Theology. Dialogo Conf 2014: Cosmology, Life & Anthropology, edited by Cosmin, Tudor Ciocan and Anton, Lieskovský, 57–69. Zilina: Publishing Institution of the University of Zilina, 2014.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Aristotelian-Thomistic Contribution to the Contemporary Studies on Biological Life and Its Origin.” Religions 14, no. 2 (February 2023): 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020214.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Contemporary Version of the Monogenetic Model of Anthropogenesis: Some Critical Remarks from the Thomistic Perspective.” Religions 14, no. 4 (2023): 523. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14040528.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. Divine Action and Emergence: An Alternative to Panentheism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Does God Create Through Evolution? A Thomistic Perspective.” Theology and Science 20, no. 1 (January 2, 2022): 46–68.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. Emergence: Towards A New Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Essentialist and Hylomorphic Notion of Species and Species Transformation,” in A Catholic View on Evolution: New Perspectives in Thomistic Philosophy and Theology, edited by Nicanor Austriaco (forthcoming). Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 2023.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Evolution and Creation – A Response to Michael Chaberek’s Polemic with Theistic Evolution.” Nova et Vetera 21, no. 2 (2023): forthcoming.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Hegel and Whitehead: In Search for Sources of Contemporary Versions of Panentheism in the Science–Theology Dialogue.” Theology and Science 11 (2013): 143–61.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. “The Metaphysics of Evolution: From Aquinas’s Interpretation of Augustine’s Concept of Rationes Seminales to the Contemporary Thomistic Account of Species Transformism.” Nova et Vetera 18, no. 3 (2020).Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. “Thomistic Response to the Theory of Evolution: Aquinas on Natural Selection and the Perfection of the Universe.” Theology and Science 13, no. 3 (2015): 325–44.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz. “What Do God and Creatures Really Do in an Evolutionary Change? Divine Concurrence and Transformism from the Thomistic Perspective.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93, no. 3 (2019): 445–82.Google Scholar

Tanzella-Nitti, Giuseppe. “La questione antropologica in prospettiva teologica.” In Centro di documentazione interdisciplinare di Scienza e fede, Conversazioni su scienza e fede, 192–95. Torino: Edizioni Lindau, 2012.Google Scholar

Tertullian. “On the Resurrection of the Flesh.” In Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol. 3: Latin Christianity – Its Founder, Tertullian, edited by Schaff, Philip and Menzies, Alan, 1202–316. Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library, 1885.Google Scholar

Thomas, Owen C., ed. God’s Activity in the World: The Contemporary Problem. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Thomson, Russell, Pritchard, Jonathan K., Shen, Peidong, Oefner, Peter J., and Feldman, Marcus W.. “Recent Common Ancestry of Human Y Chromosomes: Evidence from DNA Sequence Data.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, no. 13 (2000): 7360–65.Google Scholar

Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Saint Thomas Aquinas, Vol. 1. The Person and His Work. Translated by Robert Royal. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Valen, Leigh Van. “Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks.” Taxon 25, no. 2/3 (1976): 233–39.Google Scholar

Vander Laan, David. “Creation and Conservation.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Winter 2017. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2017. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/creation-conservation/. Retrieved 20 July 2022.Google Scholar

Vanneste, Alfred. The Dogma of Original Sin. Translated by Edward Callens. Louvain: Vander, 1975.Google Scholar

Vanneste, Alfred. “Toward a Theology of Original Sin.” Theology Digest 15 (1967): 209–14.Google Scholar

Varela, Francisco J. Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York: North Holland, 1979.Google Scholar

Velde, Rudi A. Aquinas on God: The “Divine Science” of the Summa Theologiae. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar

Velde, Rudi A. Participation and Substantiality in Thomas Aquinas. Cologne: Brill, 1995.Google Scholar

Venema, Dennis R. “Genesis and the Genome: Genomics Evidence for Human-Ape Common Ancestry and Ancestral Hominid Population Sizes.” Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 62, no. 3 (2010): 166–78.Google Scholar

Venema, Dennis R., and McKnight, Scot. Adam and the Genome: Reading Scripture after Genetic Science. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Verschuuren, Gerard M. Aquinas and Modern Science: A New Synthesis of Faith and Reason. Kettering, OH: Angelico Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Waddington, C. H. Evolution after Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Walsh, Denis. “Evolutionary Essentialism.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57, no. 2 (2006): 425–48.Google Scholar

Walsh, Denis. “Teleology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ruse, Michael, 113–37. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Wallace, Alfred Russel. Contributions to the Theory of Natural Selection: A Series of Essays. New York: Macmillan, 1870.Google Scholar

Wallace, Stan W. “In Defense of Biological Essentialism,” Philosophia Christi 4, no. 1 (2002), 34–35.Google Scholar

Wallace, William A. The Modeling of Nature: Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Nature in Synthesis. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Warfield, Benjamin Breckinridge. Evolution, Scripture, and Science: Selected Writings. Edited by Noll, Mark A. and Livingstone, David N.. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2000.Google Scholar

Wasmann, Erich. Modern Biology and the Theory of Evolution. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, & Company, 1910.Google Scholar

Webster, Gerry, and Goodwin, Brian. Form and Transformation: Generative and Relational Principles in Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar