Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 November 2020
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Technologies of the NovelQuantitative Data and the Evolution of Literary Systems, pp. 257 - 268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Abrahamson, Eric. “The Iron Cage: Ugly, Uncool, and Unfashionable.” Organization Studies 32.5 (2011): 615–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamson, Eric, and Rosenkopf, Lori. “Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation.” Organization Science 8.3 (1997): 289–309.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry. “Persian Letters (Montesquieu, 1721).” In The Novel, edited by Moretti, Franco, 2:161–72. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Aneau, Barthélemy. Alector ou le coq, histoire fabuleuse. Edited by Fontaine, Marie-Madeleine. 2 vols. Geneva: Droz, 1996.Google Scholar
Aravamudan, Srinivas. Enlightenment Orientalism: Resisting the Rise of the Novel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Argens, Jean-Baptiste de Boyer, marquis d'. Lectures amusantes, ou les délassements de l'esprit, avec un discours sur les nouvelles, 2 vols. The Hague: Adrien Moetjens, 1739, 1:52–3.Google Scholar
Aristotle, Poetics, in Russell, D. A., and Winterbottom, M., eds. Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations, 90–132. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Nancy. Desire and Domestic Fiction: A Political History of the Novel. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian. The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. London: Allen Lane/Penguin, 2009.Google Scholar
Arzoumanov, Anna. Pour lire les clefs de l'Ancien Régime: Anatomie d'un protocole interprétatif. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2013.Google Scholar
Banfield, Ann. Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Boston: Routledge and Kegan and Paul, 1982.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. “Histoire et sociologie du vêtement.” Annales E.S.C. 12.3 (1957): 430–41.Google Scholar
Basalla, George. The Evolution of Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Emmanuèle. De l'histoire de Troie au livre du Graal: Le Temps, le récit (XIIe-XIIIe siècles). Orléans: Paradigme, 1994.Google Scholar
Beasley, Jerry C. A Check List of Prose Fiction Published in England, 1740–1749. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1972.Google Scholar
Beebee, Thomas O. Clarissa on the Continent: Translation and Seduction. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Bender, John B. Imagining the Penitentiary: Fiction and the Architecture of Mind in Eighteenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Best, Stephen, and Marcus, Sharon. “Surface Reading: An Introduction.” Representations 108.1 (2009): 1–21.Google Scholar
Bibliographie de la France, ou journal général de l'imprimerie et de la librairie. Paris: Pillet, 1814–1971.Google Scholar
Bijker, Wiebe E. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Bikhchandani, Sushil, Hirshleifer, David, and Welch, Ivo. “A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades.” Journal of Political Economy 100.5 (1992): 992–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binhammer, Katherine. “The Story within the Story of Sentimental Fiction.” Narrative 25.1 (2017): 45–64.Google Scholar
Black, Scott. Without the Novel: Romance and the History of Prose Fiction (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Blackbourn, David. “‘The Horologe of Time’: Periodization in History.” PMLA 127.2 (2012): 301–7.Google Scholar
Blocker, Déborah. Instituer un “art”: Politiques du théâtre dans la France du premier XVIIe siècle. Paris: Champion, 2009.Google Scholar
Blythe, Richard A., and Croft, William. “S-Curves and the Mechanisms of Propagation in Language Change.” Language 88.2 (2012): 269–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boileau, Nicolas. Art poétique. Edited by Menant, Sylvain. Paris: GF Flammarion, 1969.Google Scholar
Boulle, Pierre. Planet of the Apes. Translated by Fielding, Xan. London: Penguin, 2001.Google Scholar
Boulukos, George. “The Secret History of the Rise of the Novel: The Novel and the Middle Class in English Studies.” The Eighteenth Century 52.3–4 (2011): 361–82.Google Scholar
Boyd, Brian. “Does Austen Need Narrators? Does Anyone?” New Literary History 48.2 (2017): 285–308.Google Scholar
Bray, Bernard. L'Art de la lettre amoureuse, 1550–1700: Des manuels aux romans. The Hague: Mouton, 1967.Google Scholar
Bray, Bernard, and Landy-Houillon, Isabelle, eds. Lettres portugaises; Lettres d'une Péruvienne; et autres romans d'amour par lettres. Paris: Flammarion, 1983.Google Scholar
Brewer, David A. “Counting, Resonance, and Form: A Speculative Manifesto (with Notes).” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 24.2 (2012): 161–70.Google Scholar
Broadwell, Peter M., Mimno, David, and Tangherlini, Timothy R.. “The Tell-Tale Hat: Surfacing the Uncertainty in Folklore Classification.” CA: Journal of Cultural Analytics, February 8, 2017. https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11069.Google Scholar
Brown, Homer Obed. Institutions of the Novel: From Defoe to Scott. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Burney, Fanny. Camilla, or a Picture of Youth. Edited by Bloom, Edward A. and Bloom, Lillian D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Buurma, Rachel Sagner. “Critical Histories of Omniscience.” In New Directions in the History of the Novel, edited by Patrick, Parrinder, Andrew, Nash, and Nicola, Wilson, 121–33. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campanini, Magda. “Fragmentation et unité du récit: Autour de la genèse du roman par lettres.” In La Partie et le tout: La Composition du roman, de l’âge baroque au tournant des Lumières, edited by Marc, Escola, Jan, Herman, Lucia, Omacini, Paul, Pelckmans, and Jean-Paul, Sermain, 337–47. Leuven: Peeters, 2011.Google Scholar
Campbell, John. “La ‘Modernité’ de La Princesse de Clèves.” Seventeenth-Century French Studies 29 (2007): 63–72.Google Scholar
Carlson, W. Bernard. Innovation as a Social Process: Elihu Thomson and the Rise of General Electric, 1870–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Carnell, Rachel. “Eliza Haywood and the Narratological Tropes of Secret History.” Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 14.4 (2014): 101–21.Google Scholar
Cave, Terence. Pré-Histoires: Textes troublés au seuil de la modernité. Geneva: Droz, 1999.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. “Leisure and Sociability: Reading Aloud in Early Modern Europe.” In Urban Life in the Renaissance, edited by Zimmerman, Susan and Ronald, F. E. Weissman, 103–20. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Chrétien, de Troyes. Arthurian Romances. Translated by Owen, D. D. R.. London: Dent, 1987.Google Scholar
Cicero, . Rhetorica ad Herennium. Translated by Caplan, Henry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Cohen, Margaret. The Sentimental Education of the Novel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Cohn, Dorrit.Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Congreve, William. Incognita, or Love and Duty Reconcil'd. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1922.Google Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. “Toward a Theory of Non-Genre Literature.” In Theory of the Novel: A Historical Approach, edited by Michael, McKeon, 51–6. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Dames, Nicholas. “The Chapter in Western Literature.” In The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature, 2016. http://literature.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-15.Google Scholar
D'Angelo, Filippo. “‘Je suis le héros véritable de mon roman’: L'Équivocité de la voix narrative dans les récits à la première personne au XVIIe siècle.” Les Cahiers du Centre de Recherches Historiques 33 (2004). http://ccrh.revues.org/237.Google Scholar
Day, Robert Adams. Told in Letters: Epistolary Fiction before Richardson. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1966.Google Scholar
De Gusta, Michael. “The Real Death of the Music Industry.” Business Insider, February 18, 2011. www.businessinsider.com/these-charts-explain-the-real-death-of-the-music-industry-2011-2?IR=T.Google Scholar
DeJean, Joan. Tender Geographies: Women and the Origins of the Novel in France. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Démoris, René. “Aux origines de l'homme historique: Le Croisement, au XVIIe siècle, du roman et de l'histoire (nouvelles et pseudo-mémoires).” In Le Roman historique (XVIIe-XXe siècles): Actes de Marseille, edited by Ronzeaud, Pierre, 23–41. Paris: Papers on French Seventeenth-Century Literature, 1983.Google Scholar
Denby, David J. Sentimental Narrative and the Social Order in France, 1760–1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Dionne, Ugo. La Voie aux chapitres: Poétique de la disposition romanesque. Paris: Seuil, 2008.Google Scholar
“Livres et chapitres: La Division du roman des Lumières.” In Le Second Triomphe du roman du XVIIIe siècle, edited by Philip, Stewart and Michel, Delon, 127–50. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2009.Google Scholar
DiPiero, Thomas. Dangerous Truths and Criminal Passions: The Evolution of the French Novel, 1569–1791. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doody, Margaret Anne. The True Story of the Novel. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Downie, J. A. “Mary Davys's ‘Probable Feign'd Stories’ and Critical Shibboleths about ‘The Rise of the Novel’.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 12.2–3 (2000): 309–26.Google Scholar
“Prologue.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Eighteenth-Century Novel, edited by Downie, J. A., xvii–xxiv. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Dubuis, Roger. “Le mot ‘nouvelle’ au Moyen Age: De la nébuleuse au terme générique.” In La Nouvelle: Définitions, transformations, edited by Alluin, Bernard and Suard, François, 13–26. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille, 1990.Google Scholar
Du Plaisir, . Sentiments sur les lettres et sur l'histoire, avec des scrupules sur le style [1683], in Poétiques du roman: Scudéry, Huet, Du Plaisir et autres textes théoriques et critiques du XVIIe siècle sur le genre romanesque, edited by Camille Esmein, 709–814. Paris: Champion, 2004.Google Scholar
Edgerton, David. “From Innovation to Use: Ten Eclectic Theses on the Historiography of Technology.” History and Technology 16.2 (1999): 111–36.Google Scholar
The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History since 1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Eliot, Simon. “Patterns and Trends and the NSTC: Some Initial Observations. Part 2.” Publishing History 43 (1998): 71–115.Google Scholar
English, James F., and Underwood, Ted. “Shifting Scales: Between Literature and Social Science.” MLQ 77.3 (2016): 277–95.Google Scholar
Esmein, Camille. “Le Tournant historique comme construction théorique: L'Exemple du ‘tournant’ de 1660 dans l'histoire du roman.” Fabula LHT 0(2005). https://www.fabula.org/lht/0/esmein.html.Google Scholar
Esmein, Camille, ed. Poétiques du roman: Scudéry, Huet, Du Plaisir et autres textes théoriques et critiques du XVIIe siècle sur le genre romanesque. Paris: Champion, 2004.Google Scholar
Esmein-Sarrazin, Camille. L'Essor du roman: Discours théorique et constitution d'un genre littéraire au XVIIe siècle. Paris: Champion, 2008.Google Scholar
Festa, Lynn. Fiction without Humanity: Person, Animal, Thing in Early Enlightenment Literature and Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Flaubert, Gustave. Madame Bovary: Provincial Ways. Translated by Davis, Lydia. New York: Viking Press, 2010.Google Scholar
“Naturalizing the Unnatural: A View from Blending Theory.” Journal of Literary Semantics 31.9 (2010): 1–21.Google Scholar
“How Natural Is ‘Unnatural Narratology’; Or, What Is Unnatural about Unnatural Narratology?” Narrative 20.3 (2012): 357–70.Google Scholar
Foley, Barbara. Telling the Truth: The Theory and Practice of Documentary Fiction. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Forcione, Alban K. Cervantes’ Christian Romance: A Study of Persiles y Sigismunda. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon, 1971.Google Scholar
Frautschi, Richard, and Martin, Angus. “French Prose Fiction Published between 1701 and 1750: A New Profile of Production.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 14.3–4 (2002): 735–56.Google Scholar
Fréron, Elie-Catherine. “Lettre I: Suite de l'Histoire de Grandisson [sic].” L'Année littéraire 5.4 (1758): 3–20.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “The Uncanny.” In Collected Papers, edited by Jones, Ernest, 368–407. New York: Basic Books, 1959.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Fumaroli, Marc. “Jacques Amyot and the Clerical Polemic against the Chivalric Novel.” Renaissance Quarterly 38.1 (1985): 22–40.Google Scholar
“Les Mémoires du XVIIe siècle au carrefour des genres en prose” (1972). In La Diplomatie de l'esprit: De Montaigne à La Fontaine, 183–215. Paris: Gallimard, 1998.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Catherine. Nobody's Story: The Vanishing Acts of Women Writers in the Marketplace, 1670–1820. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.Google Scholar
“The Rise of Fictionality.” In The Novel, edited by Moretti, Franco, 1:336–63. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Garside, Peter, James Raven, and Rainer Schöwerling. The English Novel 1770–1829: A Bibliographical Survey of Prose Fiction Published in the British Isles. 2 vols. London: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method. 1972. Reprint, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Narrative Discourse Revisited. Translated by Lewin, Jane E.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Gevrey, Françoise. L'Illusion et ses procédés: De “La Princesse de Clèves” aux “Illustres Françaises.” Paris: J. Corti, 1988.Google Scholar
Giraud, Yves. “La Dimension romanesque dans quelques ensembles épistolaires du XVIe siècle.” In Le Roman français au XVIe siècle, ou le renouveau d'un genre dans le contexte européen, edited by Michèle, Clément and Pascale, Mounier, 81–92. Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg, 2005.Google Scholar
Giraud, Yves, and Clin-Lalande, Anne-Marie. Nouvelle Bibliographie du roman épistolaire en France, des origines à 1842. 2nd ed. Fribourg: Editions Universitaires, 1995.Google Scholar
Gittes, Katharine S. Framing the Canterbury Tales: Chaucer and the Medieval Frame Narrative Tradition. New York: Greenwood Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Głowiński, Michał. “On the First-Person Novel.” New Literary History 9.1 (1977): 103–14.Google Scholar
Godenne, René. “L'Association ‘nouvelle-petit roman’ entre 1650 et 1750.” CAIEF 18 (1966): 67–78.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Claire. Vaux and Versailles: The Appropriations, Erasures, and Accidents that Made Modern France. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. Forgers and Critics: Creativity and Duplicity in Western Scholarship. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Grande, Nathalie. “Du long au court: Réduction de la longueur et invention des formes narratives, l'exemple de Madeleine de Scudéry.” Dix-septième siècle 215 (2002): 263–71.Google Scholar
Greiner, Frank. Fictions narratives en prose de l’âge baroque: Répertoire analytique I (1585–1610). Paris: Champion, 2007.Google Scholar
Fictions narratives en prose de l’âge baroque: Répertoire analytique II (1611–1623). Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2014.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Käte. The Logic of Literature. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A.C. “Sidney's Arcadia as Prose Fiction: Its Relation to Its Sources.” English Literary Renaissance 2.1 (1962): 29–60.Google Scholar
Heliodorus of Emesa. L'Histoire aethiopique. Edited by Plazenet, Laurence. Translated by Amyot, Jacques. Paris: Champion, 2008.Google Scholar
Herman, Jan, Kozul, Mladen, and Kremer, Nathalie. Le Roman véritable: Stratégies préfacielles au XVIIIe siècle. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2008.Google Scholar
Hexter, J. H. “The Myth of the Middle Class in Tudor England (1950).” In Reappraisals in History: New Views on History and Society in Early Modern Europe, 71–117. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hipp, Marie-Thérèse. Mythes et réalités: Enquête sur le roman et les mémoires, 1660–1700. Paris: Klincksieck, 1976.Google Scholar
Hudson, Nicholas. “Social Rank, ‘The Rise of the Novel’ and Whig Histories of Eighteenth-Century Fiction.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 17.4 (2005): 564–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huet, Pierre-Daniel. A Treatise on Romances and Their Original. London: R. Battersby, 1672.Google Scholar
Hume, Robert D. “Authorship, Publication, Reception (2): 1660–1750.” In The Oxford History of the Novel in English, edited by Thomas, Keymer, 1:26–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. Paul. Before Novels: The Cultural Contexts of Eighteenth-Century English Fiction. New York: Norton, 1990.Google Scholar
Jackson, Tony E. The Novel as Technology: Writing and Narrative in British Fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Jockers, Matthew L. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. “Novel.” In A Dictionary of the English Language, 1374. London: W. Strahan, 1755.Google Scholar
Jones, Silas Paul. A List of French Prose Fiction from 1700–1750, with a Brief Introduction. New York: H.W. Wilson, 1939.Google Scholar
Jost, François. “L'Évolution d'un genre: Le Roman épistolaire dans les lettres occidentales.” In Essais de littérature comparée II: Europaeana, 89–179. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Kenny, Neil. “‘Ce nom de Roman qui estoit particulier aux Livres de Chevalerie, estant demeuré à tous les Livres de fiction’: La Naissance antidatée d'un genre.” In Le Roman français au XVIe siècle, ou le renouveau d'un genre dans le contexte européen, edited by Michèle, Clément and Pascale, Mounier, 19–32. Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg, 2005.Google Scholar
Kern, Edith. “The Romance of Novel/Novella.” In The Disciplines of Criticism: Essays in Literary Theory, Interpretation, and History, edited by Demetz, Peter, Greene, Thomas, and Nelson, Lowry Jr., 511–30. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Kibédi-Varga, Aron. “Pour une définition de la nouvelle à l’époque classique.” CAIEF 18 (1966): 53–65.Google Scholar
Lallemand, Marie-Gabrielle. Les Longs Romans du XVIIe siècle: Urfé, Desmarets, Gomberville, La Calprenède, Scudéry. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2013.Google Scholar
Langer, Ullrich. “Le Roman humaniste: Vers le plaisir du fini.” In Du roman courtois au roman baroque: Actes du colloque des 2–5 juillet 2002, edited by Bury, Emmanuel and Mora, Francine, 437–48. Paris: Belles Lettres, 2004.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Translated by Porter, Catherine. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Lee, Christine S. “The Meanings of Romance: Rethinking Early Modern Fiction.” Modern Philology 112.2 (2014): 287–311.Google Scholar
Lever, Maurice. La Fiction narrative en prose au dix-septième siècle. Paris: CNRS, 1976.Google Scholar
Liebowitz, Stan J., and Margolis, Stephen E.. The Economics of Qwerty: Papers by Stan Liebowitz and Stephen Margolis. Edited by Lewin, Peter. New York: MacMillan/NYU Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Lukács, György. The Historical Novel. Translated by Hannah Mitchell and Stanley Mitchell. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Lynch, Deidre Shauna. The Economy of Character: Novels, Market Culture, and the Business of Inner Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Mander, Jenny. Circles of Learning: Narratology and the Eighteenth-Century French Novel. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1999.Google Scholar
Marchant, François. Roman sans titre, histoire véritable ou peu s'en faut. Paris: Maradan, 1788.Google Scholar
Martin, Angus, Vivienne Mylne, and Richard Frautschi. Bibliographie du genre romanesque français, 1751–1800. London: Mansell, 1977.Google Scholar
Martindale, Colin. The Clockwork Muse: The Predictability of Artistic Change. New York: Basic Books, 1990.Google Scholar
Mazzoni, Guido. Theory of the Novel. Translated by Hanafi, Zakiya. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
McBurney, William H. A Check List of English Prose Fiction, 1700–1739. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
McKeon, Michael. The Origins of the English Novel, 1600–1740. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
McKeon, Michael, ed. The Theory of the Novel: A Historical Approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Mongland, André. La France révolutionnaire et impériale: Annales de bibliographie méthodique et description des livres imprimés. 10 vols. Paris: Imprimerie nationale, 1931.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, baron de. “Quelques réflexions sur les Lettres persanes.” In Oeuvres, Vol. 3. London: Nourse, 1757.Google Scholar
Moore, Steven. The Novel: An Alternative History. 2 vols. New York: Bloomsbury Continuum, 2010.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History. London: Verso, 2005.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. R. “Make-Believe and Make Believe: The Fictionality of Greek Novels.” In Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, edited by Christopher, Gill and Wiseman, T. P., 175–229. Exeter: Exeter University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Mylne, Vivienne. “Chapters as a Structural Device in the Conte and the Novel.” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 192 (1980): 1332–33.Google Scholar
The Eighteenth-Century French Novel: Techniques of Illusion. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Orlemanski, Julie. “Who Has Fiction? Modernity, Fictionality, and the Middle Ages.” New Literary History 50.2 (2019): 145–70.Google Scholar
Orr, Leah. Novel Ventures: Fiction and Print Culture in England, 1690–1730. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Page, Scott E. “Path Dependence.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1.1 (2006): 87–115.Google Scholar
Paige, Nicholas. “The Storyteller and the Book: Scenes of Narrative Production in the Early French Novel.” MLQ 67.2 (2006): 141–70.Google Scholar
Before Fiction: The Ancien Régime of the Novel. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.Google Scholar
“Examples, Samples, Signs: An Artifactual View of Fictionality in the French Novel, 1681–1830.” New Literary History 48.3 (2017): 503–30.Google Scholar
Picard, Raymond, and Lafond, Jean, eds. Nouvelles du XVIIe siècle. Paris: Gallimard, 1997.Google Scholar
Pinch, Trevor J., and Bijker, Wiebe E.. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, edited by Bijker, Wiebe E., Hughes, Thomas P., and Pinch, Trevor J., 11–44. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Piper, Andrew. Enumerations: Data and Literary Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Pizzorusso, Arnaldo. La Poetica del romanzo in Francia (1660–1685). Rome: Sciascia, 1962.Google Scholar
Plazenet, Laurence. L'Ébahissement et la délectation: Réception comparée et poétiques du roman grec en France et en Angleterre aux XVIe et XVIIe siècles. Paris: Champion, 1997.Google Scholar
Poovey, Mary. Genres of the Credit Economy: Mediating Value in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Raven, James. British Fiction, 1750–1770: A Chronological Check-List of Prose Fiction Printed in Britain and Ireland. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1987.Google Scholar
“Britain, 1750–1830.” In The Novel, edited by Moretti, Franco, 1:429–54. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Reeve, Clara. The Progress of Romance through Times, Countries and Manners. Colchester: W. Keymer, 1785.Google Scholar
Reynolds, William H. “Cars and Clothing: Understanding Fashion Trends.” Journal of Marketing 32.3 (1968): 44–9.Google Scholar
Richardson, Brian. Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Richardson, Jane, and Kroeber, A. L.. “Three Centuries of Women's Dress Fashions: A Quantitative Analysis.” Anthropological Records 5.2 (1940): 111–53.Google Scholar
Richardson, Samuel. Selected Letters. Edited by Carroll, John. Oxford: Clarendon, 1964.Google Scholar
The History of Sir Charles Grandison in a Series of Letters. 4th ed. 7 vols. London: Rivington, 1762.Google Scholar
Riou, Daniel. “Naissance du roman moderne au XVIIe siècle – idéologie, institution, réception.” In Histoire de la France littéraire, edited by Jean-Charles, Darmon and Michel, Delon, 2:663–82. Paris: Quadrige/PUF, 2006.Google Scholar
Rivara, Anne, ed. Le Roman des années trente: La Génération de Prévost et de Marivaux. Saint-Étienne: Publications de l'Université de Saint-Étienne, 1998.Google Scholar
Robinson, Dwight E. “Style Changes: Cyclical, Inexorable, and Foreseeable.” Harvard Business Review 53.6 (1975): 121–31.Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. The Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York: The Free Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Rousset, Jean. Narcisse romancier: Essai sur la première personne dans le roman. Paris: Corti, 1973.Google Scholar
Rustin, Jacques. “Mensonge et vérité dans le roman français du XVIIIe siècle.” RHLF 69 (1969): 13–38.Google Scholar
Sandy, Gerald N. “Classical Forerunners of the Theory and Practice of Prose Romance in France: Studies in the Narrative Form of Minor French Romances of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries.” Antike und Abendland 28.2 (1982): 169–91.Google Scholar
Schneider, Gary. The Culture of Epistolarity: Vernacular Letters and Letter Writing in Early Modern England, 1500–1700. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Scholes, Robert, Kellogg, Robert, and Phelan, James. The Nature of Narrative: Fortieth Anniversary Edition. 1966. Reprint, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Simon. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Showalter, English. The Evolution of the French Novel, 1641–1782. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Skretkowicz, Victor. European Erotic Romance: Philhellene Protestantism, Renaissance Translation, and English Literary Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sorel, Charles. La Bibliothèque française. 2nd ed. Paris: Compagnie des libraires, 1667.Google Scholar
Sproles, George B. “Analyzing Fashion Life Cycles: Principles and Perspectives.” Journal of Marketing 45.4 (1981): 116–24.Google Scholar
Stephens, Walter. “Tasso's Heliodorus and the World of Romance.” In Search for the Ancient Novel, edited by James, Tatum, 67–87. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Stewart, Philip. Imitation and Illusion in the French Memoir Novel, 1700–1750. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Suarez, Michael F. “Towards a Bibliometric Analysis of the Surviving Record, 1701–1800.” In The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, edited by Suarez, Michael F. and Turner, Michael L., 5:39–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Tieje, Arthur Jerrold. “A Peculiar Phase of the Theory of Realism in Pre-Richardsonian Fiction.” PMLA 28.2 (1913): 213–52.Google Scholar
Turner, James Grantham. “‘Romance’ and the Novel in Restoration England.” The Review of English Studies 63.258 (2011): 58–85.Google Scholar
Underwood, Ted. Why Literary Periods Mattered: Historical Contrast and the Prestige of English Studies. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Distant Horizons: Digital Evidence and Literary Change. University of Chicago Press, 2019Google Scholar
“A Genealogy of Distant Reading.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 11.2 (2017). www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/11/2/000317/000317.html.Google Scholar
Vaillant, Alain. La Crise de la littérature: Romantisme et modernité. Grenoble: ELLUG, 2005.Google Scholar
Versini, Laurent. Laclos et la tradition: Essai sur les sources et la technique des Liaisons dangereuses. Paris: Klincksieck, 1968.Google Scholar
Viala, Alain. “De Scudéry à Courtilz de Sandras: Les Nouvelles historiques et galantes.” Dix-septième siècle 215 (2002): 287–95.Google Scholar
Walton, Kendall L. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Watt, Ian P. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Williams, Ioan, ed. Novel and Romance, 1700–1800: A Documentary Record. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.Google Scholar
Winner, Langdon. “Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 18.3 (1993): 362–78.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by Anscombe, G.E.M.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953.Google Scholar
Zonza, Christian. La Nouvelle historique en France à l’âge classique (1657–1703). Paris: Champion, 2007.Google Scholar