Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-r8t2r Total loading time: 0.459 Render date: 2022-07-04T01:24:15.503Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true
Taking Stock of Nature Taking Stock of Nature
Participatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy, Planning and Practice
Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

5 - Taking stock of nature in species-rich but economically poor areas: an emerging discipline of locally based monitoring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Get access



Conventional scientist-executed forms of monitoring are expensive and rely upon highly skilled scientists or technicians (Danielsen et al., 2000). As such only a small amount of this type of monitoring is undertaken in developing countries, where funding and available expertise are limited. This is unfortunate as the developing countries have the greatest importance globally in terms of their assemblages of species, including those threatened by extinction, and also have a great diversity of habitats and important ecosystem services (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005). They are also the parts of the world where habitat loss is currently proceeding at the greatest speed, and where we know least about the trends in species abundance (Balmford, Green and Jenkins, 2003; IUCN, 2007).

Recently, experiments have been made to involve less educated local people in monitoring of natural resources in developing countries. Although there are still a number of scientific questions surrounding these approaches, and many schemes are still at an early stage of development, the new approaches show a great deal of promise (Danielsen, Burgess and Balmford, 2005a; Danielsen, Burgess and Balmford, 2005c). This chapter analyses the success and challenges of four schemes that stand out from the majority, because they have been replicated and scaled-up, and are now institutionalized and adopted nationally in the respective countries. We begin by describing and explaining the activities and outcomes for each of the four schemes, before presenting our own cross-cutting analysis of the benefits and challenges of such approaches.

Taking Stock of Nature
Participatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy, Planning and Practice
, pp. 88 - 112
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Akida, A. (2007). What is the National Forestry and Beekeeping Database?The Arc Journal 21 (September 2007), 34–35.Google Scholar
Balmford, A., Green, R. E. and Jenkins, M. (2003). Measuring the changing state of nature. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 326–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., Hill, D. A. and Mustoe, S. (2000). Bird Census Techniques: 2nd edition. London: Academic Press, 350 pp.Google Scholar
Blomley, T. (2006). Mainstreaming participatory forestry within the local government reform process in Tanzania. Gatekeeper Series128. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Blomley, T and Ramadhani, H. (2006). Going to scale with Participatory Forest Management: early lessons from Tanzania. International Forestry Review 8, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brashares, J. S. (2003). Behavioral, ecological, and life-history correlates of mammal extinctions in West Africa. Conservation Biology 17, 733–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brashares, J. S. and Arcese, P. (2002). Role of forage, habitat and predation in the behavioral plasticity of a small African antelope. Journal of Animal Ecology 71, 626–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brashares, J. S. and Sam, M. K. (2005). How much is enough? Estimating the minimum sampling required for effective monitoring of African reserves. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2709–2722. Available at Scholar
Brashares, J. S., Arcese, P. and Sam, M. K. (2001). Human demography and reserve size predict wildlife extinction in West Africa. Proceedings Royal Society of London B 268, 2473–2478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brashares, J. S., Arcese, P., Sam, M. al. (2004). Bushmeat hunting, wildlife declines and fish supply in West Africa. Science 306, 1180–1183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Côté, I. M., Gill, J. A., Gardner, T. A. and Watkinson, A. R. (2005). Measuring coral reef decline through meta-analysis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 360, 385–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, F., Balete, D. S., Poulsen, M. al. (2000). A simple system for monitoring biodiversity in protected areas of a developing country. Biodiversity and Conservation 9, 1671–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D. and Balmford, A. (2005a). Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2507–2542. Available at Scholar
Danielsen, F., Jensen, A. E., Alviola, P. al. (2005b). Does monitoring matter? A quantitative assessment of management decisions from locally-based monitoring of protected areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2633–2652. Available at Scholar
Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D. and Balmford, A. (eds.) (2005c). Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Fifteen case studies presented in Special issue of Biodiversity and Conservation 14, (11), Available at Scholar
Danielsen, F., Mendoza, M. M., Tagtag, al. (2007). Increasing conservation management action by involving local stakeholders in natural resource monitoring. Ambio 36, 566–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, F., Burgess, N. D., Balmford, al. (2009). Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology 23, 31–42. Available at Scholar
,Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) (1992). National Integrated Protected Area System Act R. A. No. 7586 and Implementing Rules and Regulations DAO 25, Series of 1992. Manila, The Philippines: DENR, PAWB.Google Scholar
,DENR (2000). Guidelines on the Implementation of the Biodiversity Monitoring System (BMS) in Protected Areas. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Administrative Order No. 2000–13. Quezon City, The Philippines: DENR, Diliman.Google Scholar
,Ghana Wildlife Division (2000). Wildlife Division Policy for Collaborative Community Based Wildlife Management. Accra, Ghana: Ministry of Forestry, 11pp.Google Scholar
Gurevitch, J., Curtis, P. S. and Jones, M. H. (2001). Meta-analysis in ecology. Advances in Ecological Research 32, 199–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,IUCN (2007). 2007 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Available at
Loh, J., Green, R. E., Ricketts, al. (2005). The Living Planet Index: using species population time series to track trends in biodiversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 360, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis Report. Washington D.C: Island Press.Google Scholar
Poulsen, M. K., Massao, J., Burgess, N. and Topp-Jørgensen, E. (2007). Community based monitoring of PFM in Tanzania: initial experiences and lessons learned. The Arc Journal 21, 31–33.Google Scholar
Stuart-Hill, G., Diggle, R., Munali, B., Tagg, J. and Ward, D. (2005). The Event Book System: a community based natural resource monitoring system from Namibia. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2611–2631. Available at Scholar
Topp-Jørgensen, E., Poulsen, M. K., Lund, J. F. and Massao, J. F. (2005). Community-based monitoring of natural resource use and forest quality in montane forests and miombo woodlands in Iringa District, Tanzania. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2653–2677. Available at Scholar
,United Republic of Tanzania (2007). National Forest and Beekeeping Programme Monitoring Database (NAFOBEDA) Version 2.8. Monitoring Manual – Monitoring Procedures. Tanzania: Forestry and Beekeeping Division, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism.
Uychiaoco, A. J., Arceo, H. O., Green, S. al. (2005). Monitoring and evaluation of reef protected areas by local fishers in the Philippines: tightening the adaptive management cycle. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 2775–2794. Available at Scholar
Wily, L. A. (2000). Forest law in Eastern and Southern Africa. Moving towards a community based forest future? Unasylva 203, 29 pp.Google Scholar
Yoccoz, N. G., Nichols, J. D. and Boulinier, T. (2003). Monitoring of biological diversity – a response to Danielsen et al. Oryx 37, 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats