Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figure
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- 1 A comparative survey: German – V2 and partially OV
- 2 The functional architecture of a German clause: facts and controversies
- 3 Targeting the clause-initial position: German wh-constructions
- 4 Targeting left: clause-internal word order and word order variation
- 5 Targeting the right edge: extraposition
- 6 Case: a nominative–accusative language with a four-way case paradigm
- 7 Non-finite verbs and their constructions
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figure
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- 1 A comparative survey: German – V2 and partially OV
- 2 The functional architecture of a German clause: facts and controversies
- 3 Targeting the clause-initial position: German wh-constructions
- 4 Targeting left: clause-internal word order and word order variation
- 5 Targeting the right edge: extraposition
- 6 Case: a nominative–accusative language with a four-way case paradigm
- 7 Non-finite verbs and their constructions
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Syntax of German , pp. 354 - 367Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
(1994) ‘Functional head and interpretation’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
and (1998) ‘Parametrizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP-checking’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002) ‘On the correlation between morphology and syntax: the case of V-to-I’, in Jan-Wouter Zwart and Werner Abraham (eds.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 219–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANS (1984) Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, see , , and .
(alias: Sjef) (2000) ‘The right periphery in SOV languages: English and Dutch’, in (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 181–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987) ‘Some remarks on subordinate-clause word order in Faroese’, Scripta Islandica 38: 3–35.Google Scholar
(1991) ‘Haben kopflose Relativsätze tatsächlich keine Köpfe?’ in and (eds.), Strukturen und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien, Tübingen: Narr, pp. 144–58.Google Scholar
(1990) ‘Directionality of government and logical form: a study of focusing particles and wh-scope’, Habilitation thesis, University of Konstanz.
(1998) ‘Final complementizers in hybrid languages’, Journal of Linguistics 35: 233–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Two grammars in one: sentential complements and complementizers in Bengali and other South Asian languages’, in and (eds.), The yearbook of South Asian languages: Tokyo symposium on South Asian languages – contact, convergence and typology, New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 11–36.Google Scholar
(2003) ‘Non-nominative subjects in comparison’, in and (eds.), Non-nominative subjects, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 49–76.Google Scholar
(1955) Studien über das deutsche verbum infinitum, Copenhagen: Munksgaard. (Second unchanged edition (1983), introduced by Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Tübingen: Niemeyer.)Google Scholar
and (2004) ‘Topic, focus and V2. Defining the CP sublayers’, in (ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. II, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–75.Google Scholar
(1985) ‘Some remarks on the ergative hypothesis’, in (ed.), Erklärende Syntax des Deutschen, Tübingen: Narr, pp. 53–74.Google Scholar
and (1989) ‘On verb raising, extraposition, and free word order in Dutch’, in , , and (eds.), Sentential complementation and the lexicon, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
and (1990) ‘Stranding’, in and (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) ‘A contrastive analysis of interaction verbs with dative complements’, Linguistics 36: 253–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘Realizing Germanic inflection: why morphology does not drive syntax’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Clustering theories’, in and (eds.), pp. 121–45.CrossRef
, , and (1992) ‘Satz, Satztyp und Illokution’, in (ed.), Satz und Illokution, vol. I, Tübingen: Niemeyer [Linguistische Arbeiten 278], pp. 3–89.Google Scholar
(1977) ‘Variables in the theory of transformations. Part I: Bounded versus unbounded transformations’, in , and (eds.), Formal Syntax, New York, Academic Press, pp. 157–96.Google Scholar
(2004) ‘ “Roll-up” structures and morphological words’, in and (eds.), pp. 147–71.CrossRef
(1997) The meaning of topic and focus. The 59th Street Bridge accent, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Let's phrase it! – Focus, word order, and prosodic phrasing in German double object constructions’, in and (eds.), Competition in syntax, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
and (1995) ‘All right’, in and (eds.), On extraction and extraposition in German, Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Linguistics Today 11], pp. 179–211.Google Scholar
(1986) Italian Syntax: a government and binding approach, Dordrecht: Reidel [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999) ‘The typology of structural deficiency: a case study of three classes of pronouns’, in (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 145–233.Google Scholar
(1999) Optimizing structure in context. Scrambling and information structure, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
(1973) ‘Conditions on transformations’, in and (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 232–86.Google Scholar
(1977) ‘On wh-movement’, in , and (eds.), Formal syntax, New York: Academic Press, pp. 71–132.Google Scholar
(1982) Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1991) ‘Some notes on economy of derivation and representation’, in (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 417–54.Google Scholar
(1992) ‘A Minimalist Program for linguistic theory’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1.
and (1995) ‘Principles and parameters theory’, in , , and (eds.), Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 506–69.Google Scholar
(1999) Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Restructuring and the order of aspectual and root modal heads’, in and (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax. Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 137–55.Google Scholar
(2002) ‘A note on restructuring and quantifier climbing in French’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 617–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Restructuring and functional structure’, in (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. III, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 132–91.Google Scholar
and (1996) ‘VP-internal structure and object shift in Icelandic’, Linguistic Inquiry 27: 391–444.Google Scholar
, and (eds.) (1994) Studies on scrambling, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Studies in Generative Grammar 41].CrossRef
and (1997) ‘The position of the head and the domain of scrambling’, in (ed.), Typology: prototypes, item orderings and universals, Prague, Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica, pp. 57–90.Google Scholar
(1997) Principles & parameters. An introduction to syntactic theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and (1990) ‘Extraposition and the complement principle’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 23–47.Google Scholar
(1988) ‘Case patterns in German: Some implications for the theory of abstract case’, McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax: 79–122.
(1994) ‘Parameters of object movement’, in and (eds.), pp. 101–52.CrossRef
(1997) ‘Yiddish VP order and the typology of object movement in Germanic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 369–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Multiple questions in and about Yiddish’, in and (eds.), UMOP 25, The Proceedings of SULA 1 (The semantics of underrepresented languages in the Americas), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 20–22 April 2001.Google Scholar
den (1992) ‘Particles’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden.
(1988) ‘Universals of negative position’, in , and (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 93–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duden Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache (1966) Der große Duden, vol. IV, Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut Dudenverlag (second augmented and corrected edition, adapted by Paul Grebe).
, and (eds.) (2004) Verb clusters. A study of Hungarian, German and Dutch, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
(1975) ‘The transformational cycle in Dutch and German’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht (distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana).
(1985) ‘Deutsche Verbalprojektionen und die Frage der Universalität konfigurationaler Sprachen’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Passau, Germany.
(1991) ‘Minimale Syntax’, Habilitation thesis, University of Passau, Germany [Published as: Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 32, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen].
(1993) ‘The return of the base generators’, Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 36: 1–74.Google Scholar
(1997) ‘Minimal link effects in German (and other languages)’, unpublished MS, University of Potsdam. (Related handout from 1996 at www.ling. uni-potsdam.de/~fanselow/mlc.htm).
(2001) ‘Features, theta-roles, and free constituent order’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 405–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘Quirky subjects and other specifiers’, in and (eds.), More than words, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag [Studia Grammatica 53], pp. 227–50.Google Scholar
(2003) ‘Free constituent order: a Minimalist interface account’, Folia Linguistica 37: 191–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Partial wh-movement’, in and (eds.), Syncom – The syntax companion, chapter 47, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2006) ‘Dative and indirect object in German dialects: evidence from relative clauses’, in , and (eds.), Datives and other cases: between argument structure and event structure, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Studies in Language Companion Series 75), pp. 213–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) ‘Bewegungsresistente Verben’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 26: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986) ‘Fundamental issues in the theory of binding’, in (ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, vol. I, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 151–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Syntaktische Bedingungen für die semantische Interpretation. Über Bindung, implizite Argumente und Skopus, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag [Studia Grammatica 35].Google Scholar
(1981) ‘Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 12: 155–84.Google Scholar
and (1999) ‘Scrambling in German and Japanese: adjunction versus multiple specifiers’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 1–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1990) ‘Scrambling theories’, in and (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Prolific domains. On the anti-locality of movement dependencies, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980) ‘On the syntax and semantics of PP extraposition’, Linguistic Inquiry 11: 637–78.Google Scholar
and (1986) ‘Finiteness and verb fronting in Frisian’, in and (eds.), Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 77–110.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Antisymmetry and verb-final order in West Flemish’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3: 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986) ‘Verb projection raising, scope, and the typology of rules affecting verbs’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 417–66.Google Scholar
(1983) ‘Connectedness effects in German’, Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 23: 82–119.Google Scholar
(1984a) ‘The case of German’, in (ed.), Studies in German Grammar, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 65–101.Google Scholar
(1984b) ‘Was zu haben ist und was zu sein hat – Bemerkungen zum Infinitiv’, Papiere zur Linguistik 30: 23–36.Google Scholar
(1985) ‘A unified account of case and theta-marking – The case of German’, Papiere zur Linguistik 32: 3–36.Google Scholar
(1989) ‘Theta-tracking systems – evidence from German’, in and (eds.), Configurationality: the Typology of Asymmetries, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 185–206.Google Scholar
(1990) ‘Topicalization and other puzzles of German syntax’, in and (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) ‘Fakultativ kohärente Infinitkonstruktionen im Deutschen’, Working Papers of the Sonderforschungsbereich 340 (Universities of Stuttgart and Tübingen) 17. (Reprinted 1994 in Anita Steube and Gerhild Zybatow (eds.), Zur Satzwertigkeit von Infinitiven und Small Clauses, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 75–106.)Google Scholar
(1992) ‘Die Struktur der Nominalphrase – Lexikalische und funktionale Strukturen’, in (ed.), Deutsche Syntax. Ansichten und Aussichten, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 304–33.Google Scholar
(1992/2000) ‘Branching and discharge’ (1992) Working Papers of the Sonderforschungsbereich 340 (Universities of Stuttgart and Tübingen) 23: 1–31; (2000) in Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert and Jane Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical specification and insertion, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 197], pp. 135–64.CrossRef
(1995) ‘Downright down to the right’, in and (eds.), On extraction and extraposition in German, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Linguistics Today], pp. 145–271.Google Scholar
(1996) ‘Wenn die Semantik arbeitet, – und die Syntax sie gewähren läßt’, in and (eds.), Wenn die Semantik arbeitet, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 7–27.Google Scholar
(1997a) ‘Extraposition’, in , and (eds.) (1997), pp. 115–51.
(1997b) ‘Projective economy. On the minimal functional structure of the German clause’, in and (eds.), German: syntactic problems – problematic syntax, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 83–103.Google Scholar
(1997c) ‘Economy in syntax is projective economy’, in , and (eds.), The role of economy principles in linguistic theory, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag [Studia Grammatica 40], pp. 205–26.Google Scholar
(1997d) ‘Precedence among predicates’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997e) ‘Scrambling – Locality, economy, and directionality’, in (ed.), Scrambling, Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers. [Linguistics Workshop Series 5], pp. 61–91.Google Scholar
(2000a) ‘Scrambling – What's the state of the art?’ in and (eds.), The acquisition of scrambling and cliticization, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000b) ‘Adverb placement – Convergence of structure and licensing’, Theoretical Linguistics 26: 95–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000c) ‘The license to license’, in (ed.), Argument & case: explaining Burzio 's generalization, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000d) ‘OV is more basic than VO’, in (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a) ‘Heads and selection’, in and (eds.), Semi-lexical categories, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 67–96.Google Scholar
(2001b) ‘How to stay accusative in Icelandic and Faroese’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 68: 1–14.Google Scholar
(2001c) ‘Prosodic signals for reconstructing the basic item order. On the interplay between structure and prosody’, in and (eds.), Item order: its variety and linguistic and phonetic consequences, Proceedings of International Linguistics and Phonetics Conference 2000, Charles University, Prague: The Karolinum Press, pp. 347–66.Google Scholar
(2003) ‘V-Clustering and clause union – Causes and effects’, in and (eds.), Verb constructions in German and Dutch, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 91–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004a) ‘Pre- and postverbal adverbials in VO and OV’, Lingua 114(6): 779–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004b) ‘The superiority conspiracy’, in , and (eds.), The minimal link condition, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 147–75.Google Scholar
(2005a) ‘Parenthesen – Evidenz aus Bindungsverhältnissen’, in (ed.), Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie, Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, pp. 281–93.Google Scholar
(2005b) ‘How to turn German into Icelandic – and derive the VO-OV contrasts’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Mittelfeldphenomena’, in and (eds.), Syncom – The Syntax Companion, chapter 43, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
and (1998) Scrambling, Lund: Germanistisches Institut, University of Lund [Sprache und Pragmatik 49].Google Scholar
and (2003) ‘Scrambling – non-triggered chain formation in OV languages’, Journal of Germanic Linguistics 15: 203–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Jeffrey Lidz and Julien Musolino (2007) ‘V-Raising and grammar competition in Korean: evidence from negation and quantifier scope’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) ‘Linearizing AUXs in German verbal complexes’, in , and (eds.), German in head-driven phrase structure grammar, CSLI Lecture Notes 46, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 11–37.Google Scholar
(1988) ‘A constraint on governors in the West Germanic verb cluster’, in , , and (eds.), Morphology and modularity: in honour of Henk Schultink, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 147–61.Google Scholar
(1998) Visual intelligence. How we create what we see, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
(1978) Lexikalistische Syntax: Die Aktiv-Passiv-Relation und andere Infinitkonstruktionen im Deutschen, Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982) ‘Explikationen für “normale Betonung” und “normale Wortstellung” ’, in (ed.), Satzglieder im Deutschen. Vorschläge zur syntaktischen, semantischen und pragmatischen Fundierung, Tübingen: Narr [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 15], pp. 75–153.Google Scholar
(1991) ‘Projektionsstufen bei V-Projektionen’, unpublished MS, University of Tübingen.
and (1995) The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1992) ‘Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
(1982) ‘Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar’, Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
(1980) ‘Infinitivkomplemente im Deutschen: Transformationsgrammatische Untersuchungen zum Verb “lassen” ’, Doctoral dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.
(1982) Syntax und Semantik der Negation im Deutschen, Munich: Fink [Studien zur theoretischen Linguistik 1].Google Scholar
(1988) ‘Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung und Grammatik’, in (ed.), Intonationsforschungen, Tübingen: Niemeyer [Linguistische Arbeiten 200], pp. 89–134.Google Scholar
(1987) ‘Phrase structure, grammatical relations, and discontinuous constituents’, in and (eds.), Discontinuous constituency, New York: Academic Press. [Syntax & Semantics 20], pp. 27–69.Google Scholar
(2002) ‘Monadische Akkusativ-Subjekt-Konstruktionen im Isländischen’, Master thesis, University of Salzburg, Dept. of Linguistics.
and (2003) ‘Dutch and German verb constructions in performance Grammar’, in and (eds.), Verb constructions in German and Dutch, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 185–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1975) ‘Over afgeleide structuur en de interpretatie van zinnen’ [On derived structure and the interpretation of sentences], unpublished MS, University of Amsterdam [cited in R.G. Ruys (2001)].
(2007) ‘Asymmetries in scrambling and cyclic linearization’, Linguistic Inquiry 39: 49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) ‘The flexible nature of verb movement’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.
(1984) ‘On deriving differences between German and English’, unpublished MS, Berlin, Technische Universität.
(2000) ‘Discontinuous NPs in German. A case study of the interaction of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics’, Doctoral dissertation, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken.
(1993) Apposition: Begriffsbestimmung und syntaktischer Status, Tübingen: Narr [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 44].Google Scholar
(1988) ‘Language acquisition and the form of the grammar’, Doctoral dissertation, Amherst, University of Massachusetts.
(2007) Beyond coherence. The syntax of opacity in German, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978) ‘Über dativische Appositionen bei akkusativischem Bezugswort im Deutschen’, Linguistische Berichte 55: 1–17.Google Scholar
(1977) Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen, Tübingen: Narr [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 5].Google Scholar
(1989) ‘Agreement and agreement phrases’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 217–52.Google Scholar
and (1995) ‘Structural case, specifier head relations, and the case of predicative NPs’, in , and (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 167–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986) ‘The constituent structure of -te complements’, in (ed.), Working Papers from the first SDF Workshop in Japanese Syntax, La Jolla: Dept. of Linguistics, UC San Diego, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
é (2007) ‘About object es in the German Vorfeld’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 553–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘The EPP, scrambling, and wh-in-situ’, in (ed.), Ken Hale – A life in linguistics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 293–338.Google Scholar
(1990) ‘Scrambling in German and the specificity effect’, unpublished MS, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
(1999) A lexical approach to Italian cliticization, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. [CSLI lecture notes 84].Google Scholar
(1995b) ‘On extraposition and extraction in German’, in and (eds.), On extraction and extraposition in German, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Linguistics Today], pp. 213–43.Google Scholar
(1996) ‘Incomplete category fronting’, Habilitation thesis, University of Tübingen [SfS-Report 01–96. Published 1997, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter].
(1999) ‘Optimality, markedness, and word order in German’, Linguistics 37: 777–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1993) ‘Improper movement and unambiguous binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 461–507.Google Scholar
and (1994) ‘Scrambling as A-bar movement’, in and (eds.) (1994), pp. 331–85.
(1995) ‘Complex predicates in Dutch and English’, in , and (eds.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999) Flexible syntax – A theory of case and arguments, Doctoral, Kluwer [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 47].
(2003) ‘Eliminating positions: syntax and semantics of sentence modification’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.
(1997) Verb-erst-Deklarativsätze. Grammatik und Pragmatik, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksel International.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘Scope and word order’, in , , and (eds.), Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 867–80.Google Scholar
(1996) ‘Die syntaktische und semantische Struktur von was-für-Phrasen’, Linguistische Berichte 161: 37–67.Google Scholar
(1992) ‘Überlegungen zur Syntax und semantischen Interpretation von w-Interrogativsätzen’, Deutsche Sprache 3(19): 193–212.Google Scholar
(1987) ‘Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding’, in and (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 98–129.Google Scholar
(1986) ‘Comp, Infl and Germanic Word Orders’, in and (eds.), Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 185–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) The higher functional field: evidence from Northern Italian dialects, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
-Yves (1989) ‘Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘Parasitic gaps and the across-the-board phenomenon’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 735–54.Google Scholar
(2005) ‘An anti-localistic account of why scrambled datives in German can't bind anaphors’, SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 287–309.Google Scholar
, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey N. Leech and Jan Svartvik (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language, 4th edition, London: Longman.Google Scholar
(1995) ‘Interface strategies’, OTS Working Paper, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics (OTS), University of Utrecht.
(1998) ‘Wh-in-situ in the framework of the Minimalist Program’, Natural Language Semantics 6: 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976) ‘Reflexivierung in deutschen AcI-Konstruktionen. Ein transformationsgrammatisches Dilemma’, Papiere zur Linguistik 9: 5–82.Google Scholar
(1987) ‘Die Stellung der Verbargumente im Deutschen. Stilübungen zum Grammatik: Pragmatik-Verhältnis’, in (ed.), Sprache und Pragmatik, [Lunder germanistische Forschungen 55], pp. 139–87.
(2000) ‘On the parenthetical features of German was … w-constructions and how to account for them’, in , and (eds.), Wh-scope-marking, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 359–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) ‘Wh-Movement and integrated parenthetical constructions’, in and (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Germanic Syntax Workshop, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–40.Google Scholar
(2007) ‘Modals, so-called semi-modals, and grammaticalization in German’, Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 12: 1–56.Google Scholar
and (2004) ‘Review article of S. Wurmbrand “Infinitives. Restructuring and clause structure”’, Linguistics 42(2): 469–508.Google Scholar
(2004) ‘Object shift and scrambling in North and West Germanic: A case study in symmetrical syntax’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
and (2005) ‘Explaining Expl’, in and (eds.), The function of function words and functional categories, Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today, 78], pp. 115–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van (1983) ‘The case of German adjectives’, in and (eds.), Linguistic categories: auxiliaries and related puzzles, vol. I, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 223–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van (2006) ‘Free relatives’, in and (eds.), Syncom – The Syntax Companion, chapter 27, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1997) ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’, in (ed.), Elements of grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281–337.Google Scholar
(2004) (ed.) The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, vols. I and II, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Morphology-driven syntax. A theory of V to I raising and pro drop, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Studies in Generative Linguistic Analysis 4].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) ‘Wahlfreiheit mit Konsequenzen – Scrambling, Topikalisierung und FHG im Dienste der Informationsstrukturierung’, in (ed.), Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur, Tübingen: Niemeyer [Linguistische Arbeiten 306], pp. 251–312.Google Scholar
(1994) ‘Scrambling – was ist das?’ in (ed.), Was determiniert Wortstellungsvariation?, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 85–196.Google Scholar
(1967) ‘Constraints on variables in syntax’, PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
(2001) ‘Dutch scrambling and the strong–weak distinction’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4: 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Wh-questions in Japanese: scrambling, reconstruction, and wh-movement’, Linguistic Analysis 31: 1–41.Google Scholar
(1994) ‘Additional wh-effects and the adjunction site theory’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3: 195–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998) ‘Order in phrase structure and movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 29: 439–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Natürlichsprachliche Quantifikation und das Partitionierungsproblem’, unpublished MA thesis, University of Salzburg.
(1990) ‘VP in Japanese: evidence from -te complements’, in (ed.), Japanese / Korean Linguistics, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 319–33.Google Scholar
, (1989) ‘Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund [Reprinted 1992 by Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands].
, (2004) ‘Icelandic non-nominative subjects’, in and (eds.), Non-nominative subjects, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007) ‘Effects of givenness and constraint on free word order’, unpublished MS, University of Potsdam (to be published in and (eds.), Information structure from different perspectives).
von and (1988) Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985) ‘Dependency and coordination in the grammar of Dutch and English’, Language 61: 523–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Syntax, eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
(2007) Syntax, eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, 2nd revised edition, Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
and (1994) ‘Morphology feeds syntax: the case of particle verbs’, Linguistics 32: 913–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1993) ‘Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope-taking’, Natural Language Semantics 1: 235–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) ‘Object shift and scrambling’, in and (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 148–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) ‘Parameters of phrase structure and verb second phenomena’, in (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 339–64.Google Scholar
(1989) ‘The null subject parameter and the new mainland Scandinavian word order. A possible counterexample from a Norwegian dialect’, in (ed.), Papers from the eleventh Scandinavian conference on linguistics, Joensuu [Joensuun Ylioppilaskunnan Kirjakauppa 1], pp. 87–100.
(1995) ‘Phonological phrases: their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence’, Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
(1993) ‘The Syntax of Movement in Basque’, in and (eds.), Syntactic Theory and Basque Syntax, International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology, XXVII, 417–45.
(1985) Dépendances et niveaux de représentation en syntaxe, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) ‘Scandinavian object shift and West Germanic scrambling’, in and (eds.), pp. 487–517.CrossRef
(1995) Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1997) ‘V°-to-I° movement and inflection for person in all tenses’, in (ed.), The new comparative grammar, London: Longman, pp. 189–213.Google Scholar
(2001) ‘Verb movement variation in German and Optimality Theory’, Habilitation thesis, University of Tübingen.
(1992) Principles and parameters of syntactic saturation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1990) ‘Der Dativ – ein struktureller Kasus?’ in Gisbert Fanselow and Sascha Felix (eds.), Merkmale und Strukturen syntaktischer Kategorien, Tübingen: Narr, pp. 70–103.Google Scholar
(1989) ‘The syntax of German infinitives’, Doctoral dissertation, University College, London.
(2004) ‘The structure of clusters’, in and (eds.), pp. 173–201.CrossRef
(1994) ‘Extraposition in German’, Wiener Linguistische Gazette 48–50: 1–30.
(1997) ‘Extraposition, identification and precedence’, in , and (eds.), pp. 357–95.CrossRef
(1998) ‘Superiority in German’, in , and (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 16 University of Washington (1997), Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 431–46.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘Symmetric and asymmetric passives’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 679–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) ‘Four-way case systems: ergative, nominative, objective, and accusative’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 181–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1983) ‘On the compositionality of German prefix verbs’, in , and (eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 452–65.Google Scholar
(2001) Infinitives: restructuring and clause structure, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [Studies in Generative Grammar 55].Google Scholar
(1989) ‘Object shift as an A-movement rule’, MIT Working papers in Linguistics 11: 256–71.Google Scholar
, and (1985) ‘Case and grammatical functions: the Icelandic passive’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, (1993) ‘Dutch syntax. A minimalist approach’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
(1995) ‘A note on verb clusters in the Stellingwerf dialect’, in and (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 215–26.Google Scholar
(1996) Morphosyntax of verb movement. A minimalist approach to syntax of Dutch, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
(2000) ‘A head raising analysis of relative clauses in Dutch’, in , , and (eds.), The syntax of relative clauses, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 349–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar