Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-pkshj Total loading time: 0.658 Render date: 2021-11-30T16:50:21.643Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Hubert Haider
Affiliation:
Universität Salzburg
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Syntax of German , pp. 354 - 367
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, Werner (1995) Deutsche Syntax im Sprachenvergleich, Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Adger, David (1994) ‘Functional head and interpretation’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Alexiadou, Artemis and Anagnostopoulou, Elena (1998) ‘Parametrizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP-checking’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis and Fanselow, Gisbert (2002) ‘On the correlation between morphology and syntax: the case of V-to-I’, in Jan-Wouter Zwart and Werner Abraham (eds.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 219–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANS (1984) Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, see Geerts, Guido, Haeseryn, Walter, Rooij, Jaap and Toorn, Maarten C..
Aoun, Joseph and Audrey Li, Yen-hui (1993) ‘Scope and constituency’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 141–82.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon (1979) ‘Control in Montague Grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 10: 533–81.Google Scholar
Barbiers, LambertusJozef, Christiaan (alias: Sjef) (2000) ‘The right periphery in SOV languages: English and Dutch’, in Svenonius, Peter (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 181–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Michael (1987) ‘Some remarks on subordinate-clause word order in Faroese’, Scripta Islandica 38: 3–35.Google Scholar
Bausewein, Karin (1991) ‘Haben kopflose Relativsätze tatsächlich keine Köpfe?’ in Fanselow, Gisbert and Felix, Sascha (eds.), Strukturen und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien, Tübingen: Narr, pp. 144–58.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef (1990) ‘Directionality of government and logical form: a study of focusing particles and wh-scope’, Habilitation thesis, University of Konstanz.
Bayer, Josef (1998) ‘Final complementizers in hybrid languages’, Journal of Linguistics 35: 233–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef (2001) ‘Two grammars in one: sentential complements and complementizers in Bengali and other South Asian languages’, in Bhaskararao, Peri and Subbarao, Karumuri V. (eds.), The yearbook of South Asian languages: Tokyo symposium on South Asian languages – contact, convergence and typology, New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 11–36.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef (2003) ‘Non-nominative subjects in comparison’, in Bhaskararao, Peri and Subbarao, Karumuri V. (eds.), Non-nominative subjects, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 49–76.Google Scholar
Bech, Gunnar (1955) Studien über das deutsche verbum infinitum, Copenhagen: Munksgaard. (Second unchanged edition (1983), introduced by Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Tübingen: Niemeyer.)Google Scholar
Beerman, , Dorothee, , LeBlanc, David and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.) (1997) Rightward movement, Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Linguistics Today 17].CrossRef
Benincà, Paula and Poletto, Cecilia (2004) ‘Topic, focus and V2. Defining the CP sublayers’, in Rizzi, Luigi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. II, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–75.Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans (1986) Gaps and dummies, Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans (1985) ‘Some remarks on the ergative hypothesis’, in Abraham, Werner (ed.), Erklärende Syntax des Deutschen, Tübingen: Narr, pp. 53–74.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans and Rutten, Jean (1989) ‘On verb raising, extraposition, and free word order in Dutch’, in Jaspers, Dany, Klooster, Wim G., Putseys, Yvan and Seuren, Pieter A. M. (eds.), Sentential complementation and the lexicon, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans and Webelhuth, Gert (1990) ‘Stranding’, in Grewendorf, Günther and Sternefeld, Wolfgang (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rakesh M. (1999) Verb movement and the syntax of Kashmiri, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blume, Kerstin (1998) ‘A contrastive analysis of interaction verbs with dative complements’, Linguistics 36: 253–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, JonathanDavid, (2002) ‘Realizing Germanic inflection: why morphology does not drive syntax’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, JonathanDavid, (2004) ‘Clustering theories’, in Kiss, Katalin É. and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), pp. 121–45.CrossRef
Bobaljik, Jonathan and Thráinsson, Höskuldur (1998) ‘Two heads aren't always better than one’, Syntax 1: 37–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko and Takahashi, Daiko (1998) ‘Scrambling and last resort’, Linguistic Inquiry 29: 347–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Margarethe, Reis, Marga, Rosengren, Inger and Zimmermann, Ilse (1992) ‘Satz, Satztyp und Illokution’, in Rosengren, Inger (ed.), Satz und Illokution, vol. I, Tübingen: Niemeyer [Linguistische Arbeiten 278], pp. 3–89.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan (1977) ‘Variables in the theory of transformations. Part I: Bounded versus unbounded transformations’, in Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Tom and Akmajian, Adrian (eds.), Formal Syntax, New York, Academic Press, pp. 157–96.Google Scholar
Brody, Michael (2004) ‘ “Roll-up” structures and morphological words’, in Kiss, Katalin É. and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), pp. 147–71.CrossRef
Büring, Daniel (1997) The meaning of topic and focus. The 59th Street Bridge accent, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel (2001) ‘Let's phrase it! – Focus, word order, and prosodic phrasing in German double object constructions’, in Müller, Gereon and Sternefeld, Wolfgang (eds.), Competition in syntax, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel and Hartmann, Katharina (1995) ‘All right’, in Lutz, Uli and Pafel, Jürgen (eds.), On extraction and extraposition in German, Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Linguistics Today 11], pp. 179–211.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel and Hartmann, Katharina (1997) ‘Doing the right thing’, The Linguistic Review 14: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi (1986) Italian Syntax: a government and binding approach, Dordrecht: Reidel [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna and Michal Starke, (1999) ‘The typology of structural deficiency: a case study of three classes of pronouns’, in Riemsdijk, Henk C. (ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 145–233.Google Scholar
Cheng, , Lai-shen, Lisa (1997) On the Typology of Wh-Questions, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Choi, Hye-Won (1999) Optimizing structure in context. Scrambling and information structure, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1973) ‘Conditions on transformations’, in Anderson, Steven and Kiparsky, Paul (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 232–86.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1977) ‘On wh-movement’, in Culicover, Peter, Wasow, Tom and Akmajian, Adrian (eds.), Formal syntax, New York: Academic Press, pp. 71–132.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1981) Lectures on government and binding, Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1982) Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1986) Barriers, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1991) ‘Some notes on economy of derivation and representation’, in Freidin, Robert (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 417–54.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1992) ‘A Minimalist Program for linguistic theory’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1.
Chomsky, Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Lasnik, Howard (1995) ‘Principles and parameters theory’, in Jacobs, Joachim, Stechow, Arnim, Sternefeld, Wolfgang and Vennemann, Theo (eds.), Syntax: an international handbook of contemporary research, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 506–69.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo (1999) Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo (2001) ‘Restructuring and the order of aspectual and root modal heads’, in Cinque, Guglielmo and Salvi, Giampaolo (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax. Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 137–55.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo (2002) ‘A note on restructuring and quantifier climbing in French’, Linguistic Inquiry 33: 617–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo (2004) ‘Restructuring and functional structure’, in Belletti, Adriana (ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. III, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 132–91.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris (1997) Local economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris and Thráinsson, Höskuldur (1996) ‘VP-internal structure and object shift in Icelandic’, Linguistic Inquiry 27: 391–444.Google Scholar
Corver, , Norbert, and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.) (1994) Studies on scrambling, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Studies in Generative Grammar 41].CrossRef
Corver, Norbert and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (1997) ‘The position of the head and the domain of scrambling’, in Palek, Bohumil (ed.), Typology: prototypes, item orderings and universals, Prague, Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica, pp. 57–90.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. (1997) Principles & parameters. An introduction to syntactic theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. and Rochemont, Michael S. (1990) ‘Extraposition and the complement principle’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 23–47.Google Scholar
Czepluch, Hartmut (1988) ‘Case patterns in German: Some implications for the theory of abstract case’, McGill Working Papers in Linguistics, Special issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax: 79–122.
Dehé, Nicole (2002) Particle verbs in English, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deprez, Vivian (1994) ‘Parameters of object movement’, in Corver, Norbert and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), pp. 101–52.CrossRef
Diesing, Molly (1992) Indefinites, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly (1997) ‘Yiddish VP order and the typology of object movement in Germanic’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 369–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesing, Molly (2001) ‘Multiple questions in and about Yiddish’, in Kim, Ji-Yung and Werle, Adam (eds.), UMOP 25, The Proceedings of SULA 1 (The semantics of underrepresented languages in the Americas), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 20–22 April 2001.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den (1992) ‘Particles’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Leiden.
Dikken, Marcel den (1995) Particles, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. (1988) ‘Universals of negative position’, in Hammond, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith and Wirth, Jessica (eds.), Studies in syntactic typology, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 93–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duden Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache (1966) Der große Duden, vol. IV, Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut Dudenverlag (second augmented and corrected edition, adapted by Paul Grebe).
Katalin, É. Kiss (1987) Configurationality in Hungarian, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Kiss, É., Katalin, and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.) (2004) Verb clusters. A study of Hungarian, German and Dutch, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Evers, Arnold (1975) ‘The transformational cycle in Dutch and German’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht (distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana).
Fanselow, Gisbert (1985) ‘Deutsche Verbalprojektionen und die Frage der Universalität konfigurationaler Sprachen’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Passau, Germany.
Fanselow, Gisbert (1991) ‘Minimale Syntax’, Habilitation thesis, University of Passau, Germany [Published as: Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 32, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen].
Fanselow, Gisbert (1993) ‘The return of the base generators’, Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 36: 1–74.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert (1997) ‘Minimal link effects in German (and other languages)’, unpublished MS, University of Potsdam. (Related handout from 1996 at www.ling. uni-potsdam.de/~fanselow/mlc.htm).
Fanselow, Gisbert (2001) ‘Features, theta-roles, and free constituent order’, Linguistic Inquiry 32: 405–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert (2002) ‘Quirky subjects and other specifiers’, in Kaufmann, Ingrid and Stiebels, Barbara (eds.), More than words, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag [Studia Grammatica 53], pp. 227–50.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert (2003) ‘Free constituent order: a Minimalist interface account’, Folia Linguistica 37: 191–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert (2006) ‘Partial wh-movement’, in Everaert, Martin and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), Syncom – The syntax companion, chapter 47, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fiengo, Robert (1980) Surface structure, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg (2006) ‘Dative and indirect object in German dialects: evidence from relative clauses’, in Hole, Daniel, Meinunger, André and Abraham, Werner (eds.), Datives and other cases: between argument structure and event structure, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Studies in Language Companion Series 75), pp. 213–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortmann, Christian (2007) ‘Bewegungsresistente Verben’, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 26: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidin, Robert (1986) ‘Fundamental issues in the theory of binding’, in Lust, Barbara (ed.), Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, vol. I, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 151–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner (1993) Syntaktische Bedingungen für die semantische Interpretation. Über Bindung, implizite Argumente und Skopus, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag [Studia Grammatica 35].Google Scholar
Frey, Werner (2004) ‘A medial topic position for German’, Linguistische Berichte 198: 153–90.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner and Pittner, Karin (1998) ‘Zur Positionierung von Adverbien’, Linguistische Berichte 86: 489–534.Google Scholar
Fukui, Naoki (1993) ‘Parameters and optionality’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 399–420.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald (1981) ‘Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 12: 155–84.Google Scholar
Geerts, Guido, Haeseryn, Walter, Rooij, Jaap and Toorn, Maarten C. (1984) Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther (2002) Minimalistische Syntax, Tübingen: UTB/Franke.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther and Sabel, Joachim (1999) ‘Scrambling in German and Japanese: adjunction versus multiple specifiers’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8: 1–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther and Sternefeld, Wolfgang (1990) ‘Scrambling theories’, in Grewendorf, Günther and Sternefeld, Wolfgang (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grohman, Kleanthes (2003) Prolific domains. On the anti-locality of movement dependencies, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline (1980) ‘On the syntax and semantics of PP extraposition’, Linguistic Inquiry 11: 637–78.Google Scholar
Haan, Germen and Weerman, Fred (1986) ‘Finiteness and verb fronting in Frisian’, in Haider, Hubert and Prinzhorn, Martin (eds.), Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 77–110.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane (2001) ‘Antisymmetry and verb-final order in West Flemish’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3: 207–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (1986) ‘Verb projection raising, scope, and the typology of rules affecting verbs’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 417–66.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1983) ‘Connectedness effects in German’, Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 23: 82–119.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1984a) ‘The case of German’, in Toman, Jindřich (ed.), Studies in German Grammar, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 65–101.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1984b) ‘Was zu haben ist und was zu sein hat – Bemerkungen zum Infinitiv’, Papiere zur Linguistik 30: 23–36.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1985) ‘A unified account of case and theta-marking – The case of German’, Papiere zur Linguistik 32: 3–36.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1986) ‘Affect alpha’, Linguistic Inquiry 17: 113–26.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1989) ‘Theta-tracking systems – evidence from German’, in Marácz, László and Muysken, Pieter (eds.), Configurationality: the Typology of Asymmetries, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 185–206.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1990) ‘Topicalization and other puzzles of German syntax’, in Grewendorf, Günther and Sternefeld, Wolfgang (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1991) ‘Fakultativ kohärente Infinitkonstruktionen im Deutschen’, Working Papers of the Sonderforschungsbereich 340 (Universities of Stuttgart and Tübingen) 17. (Reprinted 1994 in Anita Steube and Gerhild Zybatow (eds.), Zur Satzwertigkeit von Infinitiven und Small Clauses, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 75–106.)Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1992) ‘Die Struktur der Nominalphrase – Lexikalische und funktionale Strukturen’, in Hoffmann, Ludger (ed.), Deutsche Syntax. Ansichten und Aussichten, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 304–33.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1992/2000) ‘Branching and discharge’ (1992) Working Papers of the Sonderforschungsbereich 340 (Universities of Stuttgart and Tübingen) 23: 1–31; (2000) in Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert and Jane Grimshaw (eds.), Lexical specification and insertion, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 197], pp. 135–64.CrossRef
Haider, Hubert (1993) Deutsche Syntax, generativ, Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1995) ‘Downright down to the right’, in Lutz, Uli and Pafel, Jürgen (eds.), On extraction and extraposition in German, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Linguistics Today], pp. 145–271.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1996) ‘Wenn die Semantik arbeitet, – und die Syntax sie gewähren läßt’, in Harras, Gisela and Bierwisch, Manfred (eds.), Wenn die Semantik arbeitet, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 7–27.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1997a) ‘Extraposition’, in Beerman, Dorothee, LeBlanc, David and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.) (1997), pp. 115–51.
Haider, Hubert (1997b) ‘Projective economy. On the minimal functional structure of the German clause’, in Abraham, Werner and Gelderen, Elly (eds.), German: syntactic problems – problematic syntax, Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 83–103.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1997c) ‘Economy in syntax is projective economy’, in Wilder, Chris, Gärtner, Hans-Martin and Bierwisch, Manfred (eds.), The role of economy principles in linguistic theory, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag [Studia Grammatica 40], pp. 205–26.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1997d) ‘Precedence among predicates’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert (1997e) ‘Scrambling – Locality, economy, and directionality’, in Tonoike, Shigeo (ed.), Scrambling, Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers. [Linguistics Workshop Series 5], pp. 61–91.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2000a) ‘Scrambling – What's the state of the art?’ in Powers, Susan M. and Hamann, Cornelia (eds.), The acquisition of scrambling and cliticization, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2000b) ‘Adverb placement – Convergence of structure and licensing’, Theoretical Linguistics 26: 95–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2000c) ‘The license to license’, in Reuland, Eric (ed.), Argument & case: explaining Burzio 's generalization, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2000d) ‘OV is more basic than VO’, in Svenonius, Peter (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2001a) ‘Heads and selection’, in Corver, Norbert and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), Semi-lexical categories, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 67–96.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2001b) ‘How to stay accusative in Icelandic and Faroese’, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 68: 1–14.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2001c) ‘Prosodic signals for reconstructing the basic item order. On the interplay between structure and prosody’, in Palek, Bohumil and Fujimura, O. (eds.), Item order: its variety and linguistic and phonetic consequences, Proceedings of International Linguistics and Phonetics Conference 2000, Charles University, Prague: The Karolinum Press, pp. 347–66.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2003) ‘V-Clustering and clause union – Causes and effects’, in Seuren, Pieter and Kempen, Gerard (eds.), Verb constructions in German and Dutch, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 91–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2004a) ‘Pre- and postverbal adverbials in VO and OV’, Lingua 114(6): 779–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2004b) ‘The superiority conspiracy’, in Stepanov, Arthur, Fanselow, Gisbert and Vogel, Ralf (eds.), The minimal link condition, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 147–75.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2005a) ‘Parenthesen – Evidenz aus Bindungsverhältnissen’, in D'Avis, Franz J. (ed.), Deutsche Syntax: Empirie und Theorie, Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, pp. 281–93.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2005b) ‘How to turn German into Icelandic – and derive the VO-OV contrasts’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8: 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert (2006) ‘Mittelfeldphenomena’, in Riemsdijk, Henk C. and Everaert, Martin (eds.), Syncom – The Syntax Companion, chapter 43, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Sue and Vikner, Sten (eds.) (1995) Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRef
Haider, Hubert and Rosengren, Inger (1998) Scrambling, Lund: Germanistisches Institut, University of Lund [Sprache und Pragmatik 49].Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert and Rosengren, Inger (2003) ‘Scrambling – non-triggered chain formation in OV languages’, Journal of Germanic Linguistics 15: 203–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-Hye, Jeffrey Lidz and Julien Musolino (2007) ‘V-Raising and grammar competition in Korean: evidence from negation and quantifier scope’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiemstra, Inge (1986) ‘Some aspects of wh-questions in Frisian’, Nowele 8: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiemstra, Inge (1994) ‘Linearizing AUXs in German verbal complexes’, in Nerbonne, John, Netter, Klaus and Pollard, Carl (eds.), German in head-driven phrase structure grammar, CSLI Lecture Notes 46, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 11–37.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack (1988) ‘A constraint on governors in the West Germanic verb cluster’, in Everaert, Martin, Evers, Arnold, Huybreghts, Riny and Trommelen, Mieke (eds.), Morphology and modularity: in honour of Henk Schultink, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 147–61.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Donald D. (1998) Visual intelligence. How we create what we see, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N. (1978) Lexikalistische Syntax: Die Aktiv-Passiv-Relation und andere Infinitkonstruktionen im Deutschen, Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N. (1982) ‘Explikationen für “normale Betonung” und “normale Wortstellung” ’, in Abraham, Werner (ed.), Satzglieder im Deutschen. Vorschläge zur syntaktischen, semantischen und pragmatischen Fundierung, Tübingen: Narr [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 15], pp. 75–153.Google Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N. (1991) ‘Projektionsstufen bei V-Projektionen’, unpublished MS, University of Tübingen.
Holmberg, Anders (1999) ‘Remarks on Holmberg's generalization’, Studia Linguistica 53: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders and Platzack, Christer (1995) The role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoop, Helen (1992) ‘Case configuration and noun phrase interpretation’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
Hornstein, Norbert (1995) Logical form. From GB to Minimalism, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Huang, James C.-T. (1982) ‘Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar’, Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Huber, Walter (1980) ‘Infinitivkomplemente im Deutschen: Transformationsgrammatische Untersuchungen zum Verb “lassen” ’, Doctoral dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.
Iversen, Ragnvald (1918) Syntaksen i Tromsø Bymaal, Kristiania: Bymaals-Lagets Forlag.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim (1982) Syntax und Semantik der Negation im Deutschen, Munich: Fink [Studien zur theoretischen Linguistik 1].Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim (1988) ‘Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung und Grammatik’, in Altmann, Hans (ed.), Intonationsforschungen, Tübingen: Niemeyer [Linguistische Arbeiten 200], pp. 89–134.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim (1992) ‘Bewegung als Valenzvererbung – Teil I’, Linguistische Berichte 148: 85–142.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim (1997) ‘I-Topikalisierung’, Linguistische Berichte 168: 91–133.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Pauline (1987) ‘Phrase structure, grammatical relations, and discontinuous constituents’, in Huck, Geoffrey J. and Ojeda, Almerindo E. (eds.), Discontinuous constituency, New York: Academic Press. [Syntax & Semantics 20], pp. 27–69.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle (1991) ‘Object positions’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 577–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kainhofer, Judith (2002) ‘Monadische Akkusativ-Subjekt-Konstruktionen im Isländischen’, Master thesis, University of Salzburg, Dept. of Linguistics.
Kathol, Andreas (2000) Linear syntax, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard (1981) ‘ECP extensions’, Linguistic Inquiry 12: 93–133.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard (1983) ‘Connectedness’, Linguistic Inquiry 14: 223–49.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kempen, Gerard and Harbusch, Karin (2003) ‘Dutch and German verb constructions in performance Grammar’, in Seuren, Pieter and Kempen, Gerard (eds.), Verb constructions in German and Dutch, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 185–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerstens, Johan (1975) ‘Over afgeleide structuur en de interpretatie van zinnen’ [On derived structure and the interpretation of sentences], unpublished MS, University of Amsterdam [refd in R.G. Ruys (2001)].
Ko, Heejeong (2007) ‘Asymmetries in scrambling and cyclic linearization’, Linguistic Inquiry 39: 49–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf (2000) ‘The flexible nature of verb movement’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Koopman, Hilda (1995) ‘On verbs that fail to undergo V-second’, Linguistic Inquiry 26: 137–63.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda and Szabolcsi, Anna (2000) Verbal complexes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika (1984) ‘On deriving differences between German and English’, unpublished MS, Berlin, Technische Universität.
Kress, Bruno (1982) Isländische Grammatik, Leipzig: Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Kuthy, Cordula (2000) ‘Discontinuous NPs in German. A case study of the interaction of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics’, Doctoral dissertation, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken.
Larson, Richard (1988) ‘On the double object construction’, Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–91.Google Scholar
Lawrenz, Birgit (1993) Apposition: Begriffsbestimmung und syntaktischer Status, Tübingen: Narr [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 44].Google Scholar
Lebeaux, David (1988) ‘Language acquisition and the form of the grammar’, Doctoral dissertation, Amherst, University of Massachusetts.
Lee-Schoenfeld, Vera (2007) Beyond coherence. The syntax of opacity in German, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leirbukt, Odleif (1978) ‘Über dativische Appositionen bei akkusativischem Bezugswort im Deutschen’, Linguistische Berichte 55: 1–17.Google Scholar
Lenerz, Jürgen (1977) Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen, Tübingen: Narr [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 5].Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop (1989) ‘Agreement and agreement phrases’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 217–52.Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop (1994) ‘Toward a unified theory of scrambling’, in Corver, Norbert and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.) (1994), pp. 301–30.CrossRef
Maling, Joan and Sprouse, Rex A. (1995) ‘Structural case, specifier head relations, and the case of predicative NPs’, in Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Susan and Vikner, Sten (eds.), Studies in comparative Germanic syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 167–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec (1991) ‘Case and licensing’, Proceedings of ESCOL 8: 234–53.Google Scholar
McCawley, James and Momoi, K. (1986) ‘The constituent structure of -te complements’, in Kuroda, Shige-Yuki (ed.), Working Papers from the first SDF Workshop in Japanese Syntax, La Jolla: Dept. of Linguistics, UC San Diego, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
Meinunger, André (2007) ‘About object es in the German Vorfeld’, Linguistic Inquiry 38: 553–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru (1997) ‘Against optional scrambling’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 1–25.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru (2001) ‘The EPP, scrambling, and wh-in-situ’, in Kenstowicz, Michael (ed.), Ken Hale – A life in linguistics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 293–338.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike (1990) ‘Scrambling in German and the specificity effect’, unpublished MS, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Monachesi, Paola (1999) A lexical approach to Italian cliticization, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. [CSLI lecture notes 84].Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon (1995a) A-bar syntax. A study in movement types, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon(1995b) ‘On extraposition and extraction in German’, in Lutz, Uli and Pafel, Jürgen (eds.), On extraction and extraposition in German, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Linguistics Today], pp. 213–43.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon(1996) ‘Incomplete category fronting’, Habilitation thesis, University of Tübingen [SfS-Report 01–96. Published 1997, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter].
Müller, Gereon(1997) ‘Extraposition as remnant movement’, in Beerman, Dorothee, LeBlanc, David and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.) (1997), pp. 215–46.CrossRef
Müller, Gereon(1999) ‘Optimality, markedness, and word order in German’, Linguistics 37: 777–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon(2000) Elemente der optimalitätstheoretischen Syntax, Tübingen: Staufenberg.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon and Sternefeld, Wolfgang (1993) ‘Improper movement and unambiguous binding’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 461–507.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon and Sternefeld, Wolfgang (1994) ‘Scrambling as A-bar movement’, in Corver, Norbert and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.) (1994), pp. 331–85.
Nash, Léa (1996) ‘The internal ergative subject hypothesis’, NELS 26: 195–209.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad (1994) ‘Scrambling as a D-structure phenomenon’, in Corver, Norbert and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.) (1994), pp. 387–429.CrossRef
Neeleman, Ad (1995) ‘Complex predicates in Dutch and English’, in Haider, Hubert, Olsen, Sue and Vikner, Sten (eds.), Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad and Weerman, Fred (1999) Flexible syntax – A theory of case and arguments, Doctoral, Kluwer [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 47].
Nilsen, Øystein (2003) ‘Eliminating positions: syntax and semantics of sentence modification’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Önnerfors, Olaf (1997) Verb-erst-Deklarativsätze. Grammatik und Pragmatik, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksel International.Google Scholar
Pafel, Jürgen (1993) ‘Scope and word order’, in Jacobs, Joachim, Stechow, Arnim, Sternefeld, Wolfgang and Vennemann, Theo (eds.), Syntax: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 867–80.Google Scholar
Pafel, Jürgen (1996) ‘Die syntaktische und semantische Struktur von was-für-Phrasen’, Linguistische Berichte 161: 37–67.Google Scholar
Pasch, Renate (1992) ‘Überlegungen zur Syntax und semantischen Interpretation von w-Interrogativsätzen’, Deutsche Sprache 3(19): 193–212.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann (1919) Deutsche Grammatik. Vol. III, part IV: Syntax, Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. and Ross, John Robert (1970) ‘Relative clauses with split antecedents’, Linguistic Inquiry 1: 350.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David (1987) ‘Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding’, in Reuland, Eric and Meulen, Alice (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 98–129.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David (1995) Zero syntax: experiencers and cascades, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David (2000) Phrasal movement and its kin, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin (2003) ‘Linear order and constituency’, Linguistic Inquiry 34: 37–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittner, Karin (1995) ‘The case of German relatives’, Linguistic Review 12: 197–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer (1986) ‘Comp, Infl and Germanic Word Orders’, in Hellan, Lars and Kristensen, Kirsti Koch (eds.), Topics in Scandinavian Syntax, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 185–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia (2000) The higher functional field: evidence from Northern Italian dialects, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves (1989) ‘Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. (1993) ‘Parasitic gaps and the across-the-board phenomenon’, Linguistic Inquiry 24: 735–54.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. (2004) Sceptical linguistic essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Michael (2005) ‘An anti-localistic account of why scrambled datives in German can't bind anaphors’, SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 287–309.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey N. Leech and Jan Svartvik (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language, 4th edition, London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya (1980) ‘On the position of extraposed clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 11: 621–4.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya (1983) Anaphora and semantic interpretation, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya (1995) ‘Interface strategies’, OTS Working Paper, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics (OTS), University of Utrecht.
Reinhart, Tanya (1998) ‘Wh-in-situ in the framework of the Minimalist Program’, Natural Language Semantics 6: 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, Marga (1976) ‘Reflexivierung in deutschen AcI-Konstruktionen. Ein transformationsgrammatisches Dilemma’, Papiere zur Linguistik 9: 5–82.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga (1987) ‘Die Stellung der Verbargumente im Deutschen. Stilübungen zum Grammatik: Pragmatik-Verhältnis’, in Rosengren, Inger (ed.), Sprache und Pragmatik, [Lunder germanistische Forschungen 55], pp. 139–87.
Reis, Marga (2000) ‘On the parenthetical features of German was … w-constructions and how to account for them’, in Lutz, Ulli, Müller, Gereon and Stechow, Arnim (eds.), Wh-scope-marking, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 359–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, Marga (2002) ‘Wh-Movement and integrated parenthetical constructions’, in Wouter Zwart, Jan and Abraham, Werner (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Germanic Syntax Workshop, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–40.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga (2007) ‘Modals, so-called semi-modals, and grammaticalization in German’, Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis 12: 1–56.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga and Sternefeld, Wolfgang (2004) ‘Review article of S. Wurmbrand “Infinitives. Restructuring and clause structure”’, Linguistics 42(2): 469–508.Google Scholar
Richards, Marc D. (2004) ‘Object shift and scrambling in North and West Germanic: A case study in symmetrical syntax’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Richards, Marc D. and Biberauer, Theresa (2005) ‘Explaining Expl’, in Dikken, Marcel and Tortora, Christina (eds.), The function of function words and functional categories, Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Linguistik Aktuell / Linguistics Today, 78], pp. 115–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk C. van (1983) ‘The case of German adjectives’, in Heny, Frank and Richards, Barry (eds.), Linguistic categories: auxiliaries and related puzzles, vol. I, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 223–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk C. van (2006) ‘Free relatives’, in Riemsdijk, Henk C. and Everaert, Martin (eds.), Syncom – The Syntax Companion, chapter 27, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk C. van and Williams, Edwin (1981) ‘NP structure’, The Linguistic Review 1: 171–217.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi (1982) Issues in Italian syntax, Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi (1997) ‘The fine structure of the left periphery’, in Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), Elements of grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281–337.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi (2004) (ed.) The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, vols. I and II, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian (1997) ‘Restructuring, head movement and locality’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 423–60.Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, Bernhard (1999) Morphology-driven syntax. A theory of V to I raising and pro drop, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Studies in Generative Linguistic Analysis 4].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosengren, Inger (1993) ‘Wahlfreiheit mit Konsequenzen – Scrambling, Topikalisierung und FHG im Dienste der Informationsstrukturierung’, in Reis, Marga (ed.), Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur, Tübingen: Niemeyer [Linguistische Arbeiten 306], pp. 251–312.Google Scholar
Rosengren, Inger (1994) ‘Scrambling – was ist das?’ in Haftka, Brigitta (ed.), Was determiniert Wortstellungsvariation?, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 85–196.Google Scholar
Ross, John (1967) ‘Constraints on variables in syntax’, PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ruys, E. G. (2001) ‘Dutch scrambling and the strong–weak distinction’, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4: 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabel, Joachim (2000) ‘Das Verbstellungsproblem im Deutschen’, Deutsche Sprache 28: 74–99.Google Scholar
Sabel, Joachim (2001) ‘Wh-questions in Japanese: scrambling, reconstruction, and wh-movement’, Linguistic Analysis 31: 1–41.Google Scholar
Saito, Mamoru (1994) ‘Additional wh-effects and the adjunction site theory’, Journal of East Asian Linguistics 3: 195–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Mamoru and Fukui, Naoki (1998) ‘Order in phrase structure and movement’, Linguistic Inquiry 29: 439–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauerland, Uli (1999) ‘Erasability and interpretation’, Syntax 2: 161–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenner, Mathias (2004) ‘Natürlichsprachliche Quantifikation und das Partitionierungsproblem’, unpublished MA thesis, University of Salzburg.
Schulz, Dora and Griesbach, Heinz (1970) Grammatik der deutschen Sprache, 8th edition, Munich: Hueber Verlag.Google Scholar
Sells, Peter (1990) ‘VP in Japanese: evidence from -te complements’, in Hoji, Hajime (ed.), Japanese / Korean Linguistics, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 319–33.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, , Ármann, Halldór (1989) ‘Verbal syntax and case in Icelandic’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Lund [Reprinted 1992 by Málvísindastofnun Háskóla Íslands].
Sigurðsson, , Ármann, Halldór (2004) ‘Icelandic non-nominative subjects’, in Bhaskararao, Peri and Subbarao, Karumuri V. (eds.), Non-nominative subjects, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skopeteas, Stavros and Fanselow, Gisbert (2007) ‘Effects of givenness and constraint on free word order’, unpublished MS, University of Potsdam (to be published in Féry, Caroline and Zimmermann, Malte (eds.), Information structure from different perspectives).
Stechow, Arnim von and Sternefeld, Wolfgang (1988) Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, Mark (1985) ‘Dependency and coordination in the grammar of Dutch and English’, Language 61: 523–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternefeld, Wolfgang (1985) ‘Deutsch ohne grammatische Funktionen’, Linguistische Berichte 99: 394–439.Google Scholar
Sternefeld, Wolfgang (2006) Syntax, eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
Sternefeld, Wolfgang (2007) Syntax, eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, 2nd revised edition, Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara and Wunderlich, Dieter (1994) ‘Morphology feeds syntax: the case of particle verbs’, Linguistics 32: 913–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna and Zwarts, Frans (1993) ‘Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope-taking’, Natural Language Semantics 1: 235–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur (2001) ‘Object shift and scrambling’, in Baltin, Mark and Collins, Chris (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 148–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Lisa (1991) ‘Parameters of phrase structure and verb second phenomena’, in Freidin, Robert (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 339–64.Google Scholar
Trosterud, Trond (1989) ‘The null subject parameter and the new mainland Scandinavian word order. A possible counterexample from a Norwegian dialect’, in Niemi, Jussi (ed.), Papers from the eleventh Scandinavian conference on linguistics, Joensuu [Joensuun Ylioppilaskunnan Kirjakauppa 1], pp. 87–100.
Truckenbrodt, Hubert (1995) ‘Phonological phrases: their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence’, Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Uriagereka, Juan (1993) ‘The Syntax of Movement in Basque’, in Lakarra, Joseph and Urbina, John Ortiz de (eds.), Syntactic Theory and Basque Syntax, International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology, XXVII, 417–45.
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger (1985) Dépendances et niveaux de représentation en syntaxe, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten (1994) ‘Scandinavian object shift and West Germanic scrambling’, in Corver, Norbert and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), pp. 487–517.CrossRef
Vikner, Sten (1995) Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten (1997) ‘V°-to-I° movement and inflection for person in all tenses’, in Haegeman, Liliane (ed.), The new comparative grammar, London: Longman, pp. 189–213.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten (2001) ‘Verb movement variation in German and Optimality Theory’, Habilitation thesis, University of Tübingen.
Vogel, Ralf and Steinbach, Markus (1998) ‘The dative – an oblique case’, Linguistische Berichte 173: 65–90.Google Scholar
Wali, Kashi and Koul, Omkar N. (1997) Kashmiri. A cognitive-descriptive grammar, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Webelhuth, Gert (1992) Principles and parameters of syntactic saturation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wegener, Heide (1990) ‘Der Dativ – ein struktureller Kasus?’ in Gisbert Fanselow and Sascha Felix (eds.), Merkmale und Strukturen syntaktischer Kategorien, Tübingen: Narr, pp. 70–103.Google Scholar
Wilder, Chris (1989) ‘The syntax of German infinitives’, Doctoral dissertation, University College, London.
Williams, Edwin (2002) Representation theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin (2004) ‘The structure of clusters’, in Kiss, Katalin É. and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), pp. 173–201.CrossRef
Wiltschko, Martina (1994) ‘Extraposition in German’, Wiener Linguistische Gazette 48–50: 1–30.
Wiltschko, Martina (1997) ‘Extraposition, identification and precedence’, in Beerman, Dorothee, LeBlanc, David and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.), pp. 357–95.CrossRef
Wiltschko, Martina (1998) ‘Superiority in German’, in Curtis, Emily, Lyle, James and Webster, Gabriel (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 16 University of Washington (1997), Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 431–46.Google Scholar
Wöllstein-Leisten, Angelika (2001) Die Syntax der dritten Konstruktion, Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen (1993) ‘Symmetric and asymmetric passives’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 679–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Ellen (1997) ‘Four-way case systems: ergative, nominative, objective, and accusative’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 181–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Ellen (2006) ‘Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure’, Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter (1983) ‘On the compositionality of German prefix verbs’, in Bäuerle, Rainer, Schwarze, Christoph and Stechow, Arnim (eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 452–65.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter (1997) ‘Cause and the structure of verbs’, Linguistic Inquiry 28: 27–68.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susanne (2001) Infinitives: restructuring and clause structure, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [Studies in Generative Grammar 55].Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susanne (2004) ‘West Germanic verb clusters: the empirical domain’ in Kiss, Katalin É. and Riemsdijk, Henk C. (eds.) (2004), pp. 43–85.CrossRef
Guido, Wyngaerd (1989) ‘Object shift as an A-movement rule’, MIT Working papers in Linguistics 11: 256–71.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira, Maling, Joan and Jackendoff, Ray (1987) ‘Case in tiers’, Language 63: 28–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan and Thráinsson, Höskuldur (1985) ‘Case and grammatical functions: the Icelandic passive’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwart, , Jan-Wouter, C. (1993) ‘Dutch syntax. A minimalist approach’, Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (1995) ‘A note on verb clusters in the Stellingwerf dialect’, in Dikken, Marcel and Hengeveld, Kees (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 215–26.Google Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (1996) Morphosyntax of verb movement. A minimalist approach to syntax of Dutch, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter (2000) ‘A head raising analysis of relative clauses in Dutch’, in Alexiadou, Artemis, Law, Paul, Meinunger, André and Wilder, Chris (eds.), The syntax of relative clauses, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 349–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Hubert Haider, Universität Salzburg
  • Book: The Syntax of German
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845314.009
Available formats