Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-05T01:52:28.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Beyond a Minimum Threshold: The Right to Social Equality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Lanse Minkler
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Over the past two decades, a growing number of human rights scholars and practitioners have focused on defining the content of the economic and social rights guaranteed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), as well as other international human rights instruments. Numerous works now elaborate on the “minimum core content” of these rights, which grouped together form an international human rights-based poverty line (CESCR 2001; Chapman & Russell 2002; Vizard 2006; Bilchitz 2007). Some works also explore the idea of an “adequate” level of social rights, as explicitly guaranteed in the UDHR and the ICESCR (UDHR Article 25; ICESCR Article 11). Both of these approaches to defining economic and social rights describe the content of the rights in terms of a minimum threshold to which a person is entitled without much, if any, regard for the overall equality in the enjoyment of these rights by the people within a society.

Yet, today there is mounting evidence indicating that economic and social inequality adversely affect many dimensions of people's lives (Commission on the Social Determinants of Health [CSDH] 2008; Wilkinson 2005). Indeed, a growing number of studies show that more unequal societies have higher homicide rates; lower life expectancies; lower average standards of health; greater discrimination against women, racial minorities, and other marginalized groups; and lower participation in elections (Wilkinson 2005). These dimensions correlate strikingly closely to human rights recognized in international human rights legal instruments, including the rights to life, health, nondiscrimination, personal security, and political participation. Thus, the research suggests that economic and social inequality adversely affects the enjoyment of human rights. In view of this evidence, it is timely to consider the extent to which the International Bill of Human Rights encompasses a guarantee of some level of economic and social equality – just as it guarantees some level of civil and political equality.

Type
Chapter
Information
The State of Economic and Social Human Rights
A Global Overview
, pp. 271 - 305
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkire, Sabina, 2007. “Multidimensional Poverty: How to Choose Dimensions,” Maitreyee 7: 2–4.Google Scholar
Alston, Philip, 2004. “Core Labour Standards and the Transformation of the International Labour Rights Regime,” European Journal of International Law 15: 457–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, Philip, 2008. “Putting Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Back on the Agenda of the United States,” in Schultz, William F. (Ed.) The Future of Human Rights: U.S. Policy for a New Era, 120–138, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, David, 2007. Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-Economic Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brigham v. State of Vermont, 1997. 692 A.2d 384, Vt.
Brown v. Board of Education, 1954. 347 U.S. 483.
Brownlie, Ian, 2008. Principles of Public Law, 7th edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campaign for Fiscal Equity v. State of New York, 2003. 801 N.E.2d 326, NY App. Div.
Chaoulli v. Quebec Attorney General, 2005. 1 SCR 791.
Chapman, Audrey and Russell, Sage (Eds.), 2002. Core Obligations: Building a Framework for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Antwerp and Oxford: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Chen, Shaohua and Ravillion, Martin, 2009. “The Developing World is Poorer Than We Thought, But No Less Successful in the Fight Against Poverty.” The World Bank Development Research Group, Policy Research Working Paper 4703.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), 1990. General Comment No. 3, The nature of the States parties obligations, Article 2(1), UN Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.1, December 14.
CESCR, 1998. General Comment No. 9, The domestic application of the Covenant, UN Doc. E/C.12/1998/24, December 3.
CESCR, 1999. General Comment No. 13, The right to education, Article 13, UN Doc. E/C.12/1999/10, December 8.
CESCR, 2000. General Comment No. 14, The right to the highest attainable standard of health, Article 12, UN Doc. E/C.12/2000/4, August 11.
CESCR, 2001. Poverty and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. UN Doc. E/C.12/2001/10, May 10.
CESCR, 2005. Concluding Observations of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Bosnia and Herzegovina. UN Doc. E/C.12/BIH/CO/1, November 25.
CESCR, 2008. General Comment No. 19, The right to social security, Article 9, UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/19, January 30.
CESCR, 2009. General Comment No. 20, Non-discrimination in economic, social and cultural rights, Article 2.2, UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/20, July 2.
Corte Constitutional de la República de Colombia (Constitutional Court of Colombia), Sentencia (Judgment) No. T-760/2008 (2008).
Craven, Matthew, 1995. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cutural Rights: A Perspective on its Development, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
CSDH (Commission on the Social Determinants of Health), 2008. Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health, Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Eide, Asbjørn, 1999. “Article 28,” in Gudmundur Alfredsson and Asbjørn Eide (Eds.) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Common Standard of Achievement, 567–635, The Hague: Martinus NijHoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Eurostat, 2005. “Income Poverty and Social Exclusion in the EU25,” Statistics in Focus 13: 1–2.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson, 2008. “The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition,” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20: 1–24.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson, 2010. “The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State,” Emory Law Journal 60: 251–275.Google Scholar
Fredman, Sandra, 2008. Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredman, Sandra, 2009. “Engendering Socio-Economic Rights,” South African Journal of Human Rights 25(3): 410–441.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann, 2002. A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom, 2001. (1) SA 46 (CC).
HRC (Human Rights Committee), 1996. General Comment No. 25, The right to participate in public affairs, voting rights and the equal right to public service, Article 25, UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.7, July 12.
Hunt, Paul, 2008. “Annual Report of the Special Rapporeur on the Right to Health to the UN Human Rights Council,” UN Doc. A/HRC/7/11, January 31.
Hunt, Paul, 2009. “Missed Opportunities: Human Rights and the Commission on Social Determinants of Health,” Global Health Promotion 16: 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Martha, 2006. “‘The Last Line of Defense for [Which] Citizens’: Accountability, Equality, and the Right to Health in Chaoulli,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 44: 349–375.Google Scholar
Khan, Irene, 2009. The Unheard Truth: Poverty and Human Rights, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Laderchi, CaterinaRuggeri, Ruhi Saith, and Stewart, Frances, 2003. “Does it matter that we don't agree on the definition of poverty? A comparison of four approaches,” Working Paper Number 107, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Marks, Stephen, 2009. “The Past and Future of the Separation of Human Rights into Categories,” Maryland Journal of International Law 24: 209–243.Google Scholar
Michael, Marmot and Wilkinson, Richard G.. 2006. Social Determinants of Health, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCoy, David, 2006. “Financing Health Care: For All, for Some, for Patients or for Profits?” in Lois L. Ross, Maureen Johnson and William Meyer (Eds.), The Global Rights to Health: Canadian Development Report 2007, pp. 59-83, Ottawa: Renouf Publishing.Google Scholar
Morsink, Johannes, 1999. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting and Intent, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neier, Areyeh, 2006. “Social and Economic Rights: A Critique,” Human Rights Brief 13(2): 1–3.Google Scholar
Norton, Michael I. and Ariely, Dan, 2011. “Building America – One Wealth Quintile at a Time,” Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1): 9–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, Manfred, 1993. U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary, Kehl, Germany: N.P. Engel.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, 2007a. “Human Rights and Human Capabilities,” Harvard Human Rights Journal 20: 21–24.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha, 2007b. “The Capabilities Approach and Ethical Cosmopolitanism: A Response to Noah Feldman,” Yale Law Journal Pocket Part 117: 123–129.Google Scholar
OHCHR (Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights), 2004. Human Rights and Poverty Reduction: A Conceptual Framework, HR/PUB/04/1, Geneva: OHCHR.Google Scholar
OHCHR, 2006. Principles and Guidelines for a Human Rights Approach to Poverty Reduction Strategies, HR/PUB/06/12, Geneva: OHCHR.Google Scholar
Oritz, Isabel and Cummins, Matthew, 2011. “Global Inequality: Beyond the Bottom Billion: A Rapid Review of Income Distribution in 141 Countries,” New York: UNICEF Division of Policy and Practice.
Phillips, Anne, 1999. Which Equalities Matter?, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne, 2001. “Feminism and Liberalism Revisted: Has Martha Nussbaum Got it Right?Constellations 8(2): 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogash, Carol, 2008. “Free Lunch Isn't so Cool, So Some Students Go Hungry.” The New York Times. Retrieved from .
Riddell, Roger, 2004. “Approaches to Poverty: A Note from the ‘Development’ Perspective,” International Council on Human Rights Policy, Researchers’ Meeting on Poverty, Development, Rights, Geneva, November 24–25.
Rogers v. Swindon NHS Primary Care Trust, 2006. EWA Civ 392.
Rose v. Council for Better Education, 1989. 790 S.W.2d 186, Ky.
Rowlingson, Karen, 2011. “Does Income Inequality Cause Health and Social Problems?” London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Sachs, Jeffrey, 2005. The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Saunders, Peter, 2010. “Beware False Prophets: Equality, the Good Society and the Spirit Level,” London: Policy Exchange.
Sen, Amartya, 1999. Development as Freedom, New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya, 2005. “Human Rights and Capabilities,” Journal of Human Development 6(2): 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogley, Sigrun, 1999. “Article 2,” in Gudmundar Alfredson and Asbjørn Eide (Eds.) The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 75–87, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Stewart, Frances, 1989. “Basic Needs Strategies, Human Rights, and the Right to Development,” Human Rights Quarterly 11: 347–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, Andy, 2010. “Global Poverty and the New Bottom Billion: What If Three-Quarters of the World's Poor Live in Middle-Income Countries?” Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, IDS Working Paper 349.
UNDP (United Nations Development Program), 2000. Human Rights and Human Development, Human Development Report 2000, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
UNGA (United Nations General Assembly), 2000. United Nations Millennium Declaration, Res 55/2, UN Doc A/RES/55/2.
United States Census Bureau, 2011. “Poverty.” Retrieved from .
Vandenhole, Wouter, 2005. Non-Discrimination and Equality iin the View of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies, Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Vizard, Polly, 2006. Poverty and Human Rights: Sen's ‘Capability Approach’ Explored, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WHO (World Health Organization), 2010. The World Health Report 2010 – Health Systems Financing: The path to universal coverage, Geneva: World Health Organization.
Wilkinson, Richard, 2005. The Impact of Inequality: How to Make Sick Societies Healthier, Abingdon, UK: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Richard and Pickett, Kate, 2009. The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Woodward, David, 2010. “How poor is ‘poor’? Towards a rights-based poverty line,” New Economics Foundation. Retrieved from .
World Bank, 2000. Crying Out for Change: Voices of the Poor, Deepa Narayan (Ed)., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank, 2001. Attacking Poverty: World Development Report 2001, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank, 2003. Making Services Work for Poor People, New York: Oxford University Press and The World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank, 2005. Equity and Development: World Development Report 2006, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yamin, Alicia, Parra-Vera, Oscar, and Gianella, Camila, 2011. “Colombia – Judicial Protection of the Right to Health: An Elusive Promise?” in Alicia Yamin and Siri Gloppen (Eds.) Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health?, 103–131, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Katharine, 2008. “The Minimum Core of Economic and Social Rights: A Concept in Search of Content,” Yale Journal of International Law 33: 113–175.Google Scholar
Young, Katharine, 2009. “Freedom, Want, and Economic and Social Rights: Frame and Law,” Maryland Journal of International Law 24:182–208.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×