Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-fxdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T07:43:25.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2024

Yaron Matras
Yaron Matras
Affiliation:
Aston University and the University of Haifa
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Speech and the City
Multilingualism, Decoloniality and the Civic University
 , pp. 152 - 170
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalberse, S., Backus, A. & Muysken, P. 2019. Heritage languages: A language contact approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afzal, N. 2020. The prosecutor: One man’s pursuit of justice for the voiceless. London: Ebury.Google Scholar
Ag, A. & Jørgensen, J. N. 2013. Ideologies, norms, and practices in youth poly-languaging. International Journal of Bilingualism 17(4): 525–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahearn, L. M. 2001. Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30(1): 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, S. 2012. On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. 2021. Complaint! Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Albino, V., Berardi, U. & Dangelico, R. M. 2015. Smart cities: Definitions, performance and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology 22(1): 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, K. & McElhinny, B. 2017. Neoliberalism, language and migration. In: Canagarajah, S. ed. The Routledge handbook of migration and language. London: Routledge, 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, A. & Thrift, N. 2017. Seeing like a city. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 2013. Us and them? The dangerous politics of immigration controls. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1992. Global ethnoscapes: Notes and queries for a transnational anthropology. In: Fox, R. G. ed. Interventions: Anthropologies of the present. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research, 191–210.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ateek, M. & Rasinger, S. M. 2018. Syrian or non-Syrian? Reflections on the use of LADO in the UK. In: Nick, I. M. ed. Forensic linguistics: Asylum-seekers, refugees and immigrants. Wilmington, NC: Vernon Press, 75–93.Google Scholar
Ayres-Bennett, W. 2018. Collaboration, connectedness, champions: Approaches within government. In: Kelly, M. ed. Languages after Brexit. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddiel, D. 2021. Jews don’t count. London: TLS.Google Scholar
Band, A. 1966. Jewish studies in American liberal-arts colleges and universities. American Jewish Yearbook 67: 1–30.Google Scholar
Baron, M. 2012. Do we need smart cities for resilience? Journal of Economics and Management 10: 32–46.Google Scholar
Batac, M. A. 2022. ‘Failing’ and finding a Filipina diasporic scholarly ‘home’: A de/colonizing autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry 28(1): 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batty, M. 2013. Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography 3(3): 274–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beattie, G. 2013. Our racist heart? An exploration of unconscious prejudice in everyday life. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessant, K. C. 2018. The relational fabric of community. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhambra, G. K., Gebrial, D. & Nişancıoğlu, K. eds. 2018. Decolonising the university. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, K. 2016. The vulnerable academic: Personal narratives and strategic de/colonizing of academic structures. Qualitative Inquiry 22(5): 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharyya, G., Elliott-Cooper, A., Balani, S., Nişancıoğlu, K., Koram, K., Gebrial, D., El-Enany, N. & de Noronha, L. 2021. Empire’s endgame. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F., Green, D. & Gollan, T. H. 2009. Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 10: 89–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bischoff, A. & Hudelson, P. 2010. Access to healthcare interpreter services: Where are we and where do we need to go? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7(7): 2838–2844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackledge, A. & Creese, A. 2009. ‘Because tumi Bangali’: Inventing and disinventing the national in multilingual communities in the UK. Ethnicities 9(4): 451–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackledge, A. & Creese, A. 2010. Multilingualism: A critical perspective. London: Continuum International.Google Scholar
Blackledge, A. & Creese, A. 2012. Pride, profit and distinction: Negotiation across time and space in community language education. In: Duchêne, A. & Heller, M. eds. Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit. New York: Routledge, 116–141.Google Scholar
Blackledge, A. & Creese, A., with Baynham, M., Cooke, M., Goodson, L., Hua, Z., Malkani, B., Phillimore, J., Robinson, M., Rock, F., Simpson, J., Tagg, C., Thompson, J., Trehan, K. & Li, Wei. 2018. Language and superdiversity: An interdisciplinary perspective. In: Creese, A. & Blackledge, A. eds. The Routledge handbook of language and superdiversity. London: Routledge, xxi–xlv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, D. 2006. Multilingual identities in a global city. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blokland, T. 2017. Community as urban practice. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2009. Language, asylum & the national order. Current Anthropology 50(4): 415–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2010. Sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2013a. Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity, vol. 18. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. 2013b. Citizenship, language, and superdiversity: Towards complexity. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 12(3): 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. & Backus, A. 2013. Superdiverse repertoires and the individual. In: Saint-Georges, I. & Weber, J. J eds. Multilingualism and multimodality: The future of education research. Rotterdam: Sense, 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. & Rampton, B. 2011. Language and superdiversity. Diversities 132: 1–21.Google Scholar
Bonacina-Pugh, F. 2012. Researching ‘practiced language policies’: Insights from conversation analysis. Language Policy 11(3): 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonacina-Pugh, F. 2020. Legitimizing multilingual practices in the classroom: The role of the practiced language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 23(4): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, J. & Glasgow, G. P. eds. 2018. Agency in language policy and planning: Critical inquiries. New York & London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, J. 2017. Translanguaging engagement: Dynamic multilingualism and university language engagement programmes. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature 10(4): 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, J. & Atkinson, L. 2020. Translanguaging beyond bricolage: Meaning making and collaborative ethnography in community arts. In: Moore, E., Bradley, J. & Simpson, J. eds. Translanguaging as transformation: The collaborative construction of new linguistic realities. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 135–154.Google Scholar
Bradley, J., Moore, E., Simpson, J. & Atkinson, L. 2018. Translanguaging space and creative activity: Theorising collaborative arts-based learning. Language and Intercultural Communication 18(1): 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brear, M. R. & Tsotetsi, C. T. 2021. (De)colonising outcomes of community participation: A South African ethnography of ‘ethics in practice’. Qualitative Research 22(6): 1–18.Google Scholar
Brizić, K. & Hufnagl, C. L. 2011. Multilingual cities Wien: Bericht zur Sprachenerhebung in den 3. und 4. Volksschulklassen. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Brooks, E., Clark, C. & Rostas, I. 2022. Engaging with decolonisation, tackling antigypsyism: Lessons from teaching Romani Studies at the Central European University in Hungary. Social Policy & Society 21(1): 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, R. 2004. Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, R. 2005. The ‘diaspora’ diaspora. Ethnic and Racial Studies 28(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, R. & Cooper, F. 2000. Beyond ‘identity’. Theory and Society 29(1): 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryer, T., Pliscoff, C. & Connors, A. W. 2020. Civic mission of the university. In: Bryer, T., Pliscoff, C. & Connors, A. W. eds. Promoting civic health through university–community partnerships. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bührig, K., Kliche, O., Meyer, B. & Pawlack, B. 2012. Explaining the interpreter’s unease: Conflicts and contradictions in bilingual communication in clinical settings. In: Braunmüller, K. & Gabriel, C. eds. Multilingual individuals and multilingual societies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, B. 2012. The linguistic repertoire revisited. Applied Linguistics 33(5): 503–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, B. 2015. Linguistic repertoire and Spracherleben, the lived experience of language. Applied Linguistics 38(3): 340–358.Google Scholar
Busch, B. 2018. The language portrait in multilingualism research: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies 236.Google Scholar
Busteed, M. 2016. A cosmopolitan city. In: Kidd, A. & Wyke, T. eds. Manchester: Making the modern city. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 213–257.Google Scholar
Butler, J. [1999] 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, T. 2010. The role of linguists and native speakers in language analysis for the determination of speaker origin. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 17(1): 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, T. 2012. Clarification of the issues in language analysis: A rejoinder to Fraser and Verrips. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 19(1): 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, T. 2018. Language analysis in the asylum procedure: Consider the context. In: Nick, I. M. ed. Forensic linguistics: Asylum-seekers, refugees and immigrants. Wilmington, NC: Vernon Press, 1–21.Google Scholar
Cameron, J. & Gibson, K. 2005. Participatory action research in a post-structuralist vein. Geoforum 36(3): 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. 2013. Language analysis in the United Kingdom’s refugee status determination system: Seeing through policy claims about ‘expert knowledge’. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36(4): 670–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. & Hwa, Y. S. 2015. The spirit of community engagement. International e-Journal of Community & Industry Engagement 2(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S., ed. 2017. The Routledge handbook of migration and language. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. 2022. Challenges in decolonizing linguistics: The politics of enregisterment and the divergent uptakes of translingualism. Educational Linguistics 1(1): 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chik, A., Benson, P. & Moloney, R., eds. 2019. Multilingual Sydney. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chlosta, C., Ostermann, T. & Schroeder, C. 2003. Die ‘Durchschnittsschule’ und ihre Sprachen: Ergebnisse des Projekts Sprachenerhebung Essener Grundschulen (SPREEG) [The ‘average school’ and its languages: Results of the project language elicitation in Essen’s primary schools (SPREEG)]. Essener Linguistische Skripte 3(1): 43–139.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. 1991. Community languages: The Australian experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M. & Kipp, S. 2006. Australia’s community languages. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2006(180): 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, M., Hajek, J. & Kipp, S. 2008. Tale of two multilingual cities in a multilingual continent. People & Place 16(3): 1–8.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. 2008. Global diasporas: An introduction (2nd edition). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, P. 1989. The contested terrain of locality studies. Tijdschrift voor sociale en economise geografie 80(1): 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, C. 2004. A critical examination of the use of language analysis interviews in asylum proceedings: A case study of a West African seeking asylum in the Netherlands. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law 11(2): 200–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornwall, A. 2008. Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meaning and practices. Community Development Journal 43(3): 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, L. 2015. Scholarship and activism: A social movements perspective. Studies in Social Science 9: 34–53.Google Scholar
Craig, S. 2012. The use of language analysis in asylum decision making in the UK: A discussion. Journal of Immigration Asylum and Nationality Law 26(3): 255–268.Google Scholar
Craig, S. & Zwaan, K. 2019. Legal aspects of LADO from a European perspective: Struggling with the burden of proof? In: Patrick, P., Schmid, M.S. & Zwaan, K. eds. Language analysis for the determination of origin: Current perspectives and new directions. Cham: Springer, 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creese, A. & Blackledge, A. eds. 2018. The Routledge handbook of language and superdiversity. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, K. (Akala) 2021. Natives: Race & class in the ruins of empire. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
De Vries, J. 1990. On coming to our census: A layman’s guide to demolinguistics. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 11(1–2): 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deumert, A. 2018a. Commentary: On participation and resistance. In: Lim, L., Stroud, C. & Wee, L. eds. The multilingual citizen: Towards a politics of language for agency and change. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 289–299.Google Scholar
Deumert, A. 2018b. The multivocality of heritage: Moments, encounters and mobilities. In: Creese, A. & Blackledge, A. eds. The Routledge handbook of language and superdiversity. London: Routledge, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deumert, A., Storch, A. & Shepherd, N., eds. 2020. Colonial and decolonial linguistics: Knowledges and epistemes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicken, P. 2002. Global Manchester: From globaliser to globalised. In: Peck, J. & Ward, K. eds. City of revolution: Restructuring Manchester. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 18–33.Google Scholar
Diner, S. J. 2017. Universities and their cities: Urban higher education in America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donakey, A. 2007. Language planning and policy in Manchester. MA dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Douglass, M. 2008. Livable cities: Neoliberal v. convivial modes of urban planning in Seoul. The Korea Spatial Planning Review 59: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, J. & Gogolin, I. eds. 2013. Linguistic superdiversity in urban areas: Research approaches, vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eades, D. 2005. Applied linguistics and language analysis in asylum seeker cases. Applied Linguistics 26(4): 503–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eades, D. 2009. Testing the claims of asylum seekers: The role of language analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly 6: 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, V. 2001. Community languages in the United Kingdom. In: Extra, G. & Gorter, D. eds. The other languages of Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 243–250.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, F. 1845. Die Lage der arbeitenden Klasse in England. Leipzig: Wigand.Google Scholar
Extra, G. & Yaǧmur, K. eds. 2004. Urban multilingualism in Europe: Immigrant minority languages at home and school. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Extra, G. & Yağmur, K. 2011. Urban multilingualism in Europe: Mapping linguistic diversity in multicultural cities. Journal of Pragmatics 43(5): 1173–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincher, R., Iveson, K., Leitner, H. & Preston, V. 2014. Planning in the multicultural city: Celebrating diversity or reinforcing difference? Progress in Planning 92: 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J. A. 1971. Sociolinguistics. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, S. 2019. Transnational languages, multilinguals and the challenges for LADO. In: Patrick, P., Schmid, M. S. & Zwaan, K. eds. Language analysis for the determination of origin: Current perspectives and new directions. Cham: Springer, 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flew, T. 2020. Globalization, neoglobalization and postglobalization: The challenge of populism and the return of the national. Global Media and Communication 16: 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, G. 2005. The impact of medical interpreter services on the quality of health care: A systematic review. Medical Care Research and Review 62(3): 255–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foucault, M. 2008. The birth of bio-politics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P., French, P. & Wilson, K. 2019. LADO as forensic speaker profiling. In: Patrick, P., Schmid, M. S. & Zwaan, K. eds. Language analysis for the determination of origin: Current perspectives and new directions. Cham: Springer, 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, H. 2009. The role of ‘educated native speakers’ in providing language analysis for the determination of the origin of asylum seekers. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law 16(1): 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, H. 2019. The role of native speakers in LADO: Are we missing a more important question? In: Patrick, P., Schmid, M. S. & Zwaan, K. eds. Language analysis for the determination of origin: Current perspectives and new directions. Cham: Springer, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. 2001. Recognition without ethics? Theory, Culture & Society 18(2–3): 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fürstenau, S., Gogolin, I. & Yağmur, K. eds. 2003. Mehrsprachigkeit in Hamburg: Ergebnisse einer Sprachenerhebung an den Grundschulen in Hamburg. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Gaiser, L. & Matras, Y. 2016a. The spatial construction of civic identities: A study of Manchester’s linguistic landscapes. http://mlm.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ManchesterLinguisticLandscapes.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gaiser, L. & Matras, Y. 2016b. Language provisions in access to primary and hospital care in central Manchester. Multilingual Manchester: University of Manchester. http://mlm.humanities.manchester.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Language-provisions-in-access-to-primary-and-hospital-care-Sept-2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gaiser, L. & Matras, Y. 2020a. Defining the position of ‘community’ in the study of linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape: An International Journal 6(2): 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaiser, L. & Matras, Y. 2020b. Re-visiting ‘community language’: Arabic in a Western global city. In: Mar-Molinero, C. ed. Researching language in superdiverse urban contexts: Exploring methodological and theoretical concepts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 52–78.Google Scholar
García, O. 1997. New York’s multilingualism: World languages and their role in a U.S. city. In: García, O. & Fishman, J. A. eds. The multilingual apple: Languages in New York City. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 3–50.Google Scholar
García, O. & Fishman, J. A. 1997. The multilingual apple: Languages in New York City. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
García, O. & Li, Wei. 2014. Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garibay, C, Yalowitz, S. & guest editors. 2015. Redefining multilingualism in museums: A case for broadening our thinking. Museums & Social Issues 10(1): 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2004. Area studies after post structuralism. Environment and Planning A 36: 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilroy, P. 2004. After empire: Melancholia or convivial culture? London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick Schiller, N. 2010. Cities and transnationality. In: Bridge, G. & Watson, S. eds. The new Blackwell companion to the city. Oxford: Blackwell, 172–192.Google Scholar
Goddard, J. 2018. The civic university and the city. In: Meusburger, P., Heffernan, M. & Suarsana, L. eds. Geographies of the University. Cham: Springer, 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, J., Hazelkorn, E., Kempton, L. & Vallance, P. 2016. The civic university: The policy and leadership challenges. Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gogolin, I. 2002. Linguistic and cultural diversity in Europe: A challenge for educational research and practice. European Educational Research Journal 1(1): 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodfellow, M. 2019. Hostile environment: How immigrants became scapegoats. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Goodhart, D. 2017. The road to somewhere: The populist revolt and the future of politics. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
Gorter, D. 2013. Linguistic landscapes in a multilingual world. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 33: 190–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, L. & Kantor, J. M. 2007. ‘Soft’ area studies versus ‘hard’ social science: A false opposition. Slavic Studies 66(1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Greiner, C. & Sakdapolrak, P. 2013. Translocality: Concepts, applications and emerging research perspectives. Geography Compass 7(5): 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1990. Cultural identity and diaspora. In: Rutherford, J. ed. Identity: Community, culture, difference. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 222–237.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1997. The local and the global: Globalization and ethnicity. In: King, A.D. ed. Culture, globalization and the world-system: Contemporary conditions for the representation of identity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 19–39.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. [2019] 1992. The West and the rest: Discourse and power. In: Hall, S. Essential Essays, edited by Morley, D., vol. 2. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 141–184.Google Scholar
Hall, Suzanne. 2012. City, street and citizen: The measure of the ordinary. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, F. 1992. The millet of Manchester: Arab merchants and the cotton trade. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 19(2): 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halwachs, D. W., Schrammel-Leber, B. & Klinge, S. A. 2013. Romani, education, segregation and the European Charter for Regional and Minority Languages. Graz: Grazer Linguistische Studien.Google Scholar
Harding, A. & Blokland, T. 2014. Urban theory: A critical introduction to power, cities and urbanism in the 21st century. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Harkavy, I. 2006. The role of universities in advancing citizenship and social justice in the 21st century. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 1(1): 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harney, L., McCurry, J., Scott, J. & Wills, J. 2016. Developing ‘process pragmatism’ to underpin engaged research in human geography. Progress in Human Geography 40: 316–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. 2008. Language and the nation‐state: Challenges to sociolinguistic theory and practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 504–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. 2010a. Paths to post-nationalism: A critical ethnography of language and identity. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, M. 2010b. The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. & Duchêne, A. 2012. Pride and profit: Changing discourses of language, capital and nation-state. In: Duchêne, A. & Heller, M. eds. Language in late capitalism: Pride and profit. New York: Routledge, 1–21.Google Scholar
Heller, M. & McElhinny, B. eds. 2017. Language, capitalism, colonialism: Toward a critical history. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hernon, I. 2020. Antisemitism and the left. Stroud: Amberley.Google Scholar
Heryanto, A. 2013. The intimacies of cultural studies and area studies: The case of Southeast Asia. International Journal of Cultural Studies 16: 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heugh, K. 2018. Commentary – Linguistic citizenship: Who decides whose languages, ideologies and vocabulary matter? In: Lim, L., Stroud, C. & Wee, L. eds. The multilingual citizen: Towards a politics of language for agency and change. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 174–189.Google Scholar
Heugh, K. 2022. Linguistic citizenship as a decolonial lens on southern multilingualisms and epistemologies. In: Williams, Q., Deumert, A. & Milani, T. M. Struggles for multilingualism and linguistic citizenship. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, C. 2017. Space, place and language. In: Canagarajah, S. ed. The Routledge handbook of migration and language. London: Routledge, 102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsh, D. 2018. Contemporary left antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hlavac, J. & Stolac, D. eds. 2021. Diaspora language contact: The speech of Croatian speakers abroad. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan-Brun, G. 2018. This post-Brexit linguanomics. In: Kelly, M. ed. Languages after Brexit: How the UK speaks to the world. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollands, R. G. 2008. Will the real smart city please stand up. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 12(3): 303–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, B. 2018. Speaking to a global future: The increasing value of language and culture to British business post-Brexit. In: Kelly, M. ed. Languages after Brexit: How the UK speaks to the world. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. & Meyerhoff, M. 1999. The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society 28(2): 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmwood, J. 2018. Race and the neoliberal university: Lessons from the public university. In: Bhambra, G. K., Gebrial, D. & Nişancıoğlu, K. eds. Decolonising the university. London: Pluto Press, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, N. H., Tapia, A. A., Hanks, D. H., Dueñas, F. K. & Lee, S. 2018. Ethnography of language planning and policy. Language Teaching 512: 152–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskin, J. 2018. Native speaker non-linguistics in LADO: An insider perspective. In: Nick, I. M. ed. Forensic linguistics: Asylum-seekers, refugees and immigrants. Wilmington, NC: Vernon Press, 23–40.Google Scholar
Hoskin, J., Cambier-Langeveld, T. & Foulkes, P. 2020. Improving objectivity, balance and forensic fitness in LAAP: A response to Matras. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 26(2): 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J. 2020. A shifting standard: A stratified ideological ecology in a Birmingham Chinese complementary school. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 42(2): 1–13.Google Scholar
Hylton, S. 2003. A history of Manchester. Stroud: Phillimore.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. 1972. On communicative competence. In: Pride, J. B. & Holmes, J. eds. Sociolinguistics: Selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 269–293.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. 1991. Mapping meanings: A cultural critique of locality studies. Environment and Planning 23: 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworska, S. & Themistocleous, C. 2018. Public discourses on multilingualism in the UK: Triangulating a corpus study with a sociolinguistic attitude survey. Language in Society 47(1): 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, J. B. & Salmons, J. C. eds. 2015. Germanic heritage languages in North America: Acquisition, attrition and change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. C. & Johnson, E. J. 2015. Power and agency in language policy appropriation. Language Policy 14(3): 221–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, J. N. 2008. Polylingual languaging around and among children and adolescents. International Journal of Multilingualism 5(3): 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, C. 2008. Difference, subjectivities and power: (De)colonizing practices in internationalizing the curriculum. Intercultural Education 19(1): 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joss, S., Cook, M. & Dayot, Y. 2017. Smart cities: Towards a new citizenship regime? A discourse analysis of the British smart city standard. Journal of Urban Technology 24(4): 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalayil, S. 2019. Second-generation South Asian Britons: Multilingualism, heritage languages and diasporic identity. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Karatsareas, P. 2018. Attitudes towards Cypriot Greek and Standard Modern Greek in London’s Greek Cypriot community. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(4): 412–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, M. ed. 2018. Languages after Brexit: How the UK speaks to the world. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly-Holmes, H. & Pietikäinen, S. 2016. Language: A challenging resource in a museum of Sámi culture. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 16(1): 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshet, Y. & Popper-Giveon, A. 2019. Language practice and policy in Israeli hospitals: The case of the Hebrew and Arabic languages. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 8(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, K. 2017. Citizenship, securitization and suspicion in UK ESOL policy. In: Arnaut, K., Karrebæk, M. S., Spotti, M. & Blommaert, J. eds. Engaging superdiversity: Recombining spaces, times and language practices. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 303–320.Google Scholar
Khan-Harris, K. 2019. Strange hate: Antisemitism, racism and the limits of diversity. London: Repeater Books.Google Scholar
Kidd, A. 1993. Manchester: A history. Lancaster: Carnegie.Google Scholar
King, L. 2016. Multilingual cities and the future: Vitality or decline? In: King, L. & Carson, L. eds. The multilingual city: Vitality, conflict and change. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, L. & Carson, L. eds. 2016. The multilingual city: Vitality, conflict and change. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubik, J. 2015. Between contextualization and comparison: A thorny relationship between East European studies and disciplinary ‘mainstreams’. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 29(2): 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
Lanvers, U., Doughty, H. & Thompson, A. 2018. Brexit as linguistic symptom of Britain retreating into its shell? Brexit-induced politicization of language learning. The Modern Language Journal 102(4): 775–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Hancock, M. G. & Hu, M. 2014. Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 89: 80–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, L. 2022. The myth of orderly multilingualism. In: Williams, Q., Deumert, A. & Milani, T. M. Struggles for multilingualism and linguistic citizenship. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 19–34.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. 1968. Le droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Leggio, D. V. 2017. Critiquing stereotypes: Research engagement with local authority interventions in support of Roma migrants. ANUAC 6(1): 119–140.Google Scholar
Liao, M.-H. 2018. Museums and creative industries: The contribution of translation studies. The Journal of Specialised Translation 29: 45–62.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, A. J. & Taylor-Leech, K. 2020. Agency in language planning and policy. Current Issues in Language Planning 22(1–2): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipponen, L. & Kumpulainen, K. 2011. Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 27: 812–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Li. 2006. Complementary schools, past, present and future. Language and Education 20(1): 76–83.Google Scholar
Wei, Li. 2018a. Translanguaging as a practical theory of languages. Applied Linguistics 39(1): 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Li. 2018b. Linguistic (super-)diversity, post-multilingualism and translanguaging moments. In: Creese, A. & Blackledge, A. eds. The Routledge handbook of language and superdiversity. London: Routledge, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, Y. S. 2007. Cantonese-English code-switching in the Manchester Chinese immigrant community. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Lorenz, C. 2012. If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry 38(3): 599–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, N. & Heynen, N. 2021. Abolishing the frontier: (De)colonizing ‘public’ education. Social & Cultural Geography 22(3): 403–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lytra, V. 2011. Negotiating language, culture and pupil agency in complementary school classrooms. Linguistics and Education 22(1): 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lytra, V. & Baraç, T. 2008. Language practices, language ideologies and identity construction in London Turkish complementary schools. In: Lytra, V. & Jørgensen, N. eds. 2008. Multilingualism and identities across contexts: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on Turkish-speaking youth in Europe. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen (Copenhagen Studies in Bilingualism 45).Google Scholar
Macaro, E. 2008. The decline in language learning in England: Getting the facts right and getting real. Language Learning Journal 36(1): 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, I., Bhavnani, R., Khan, L. & Gus, J. 1989. Murder in the playground: The report of the Macdonald Inquiry into racism and racial violence in Manchester schools. London: Longsight Press.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, B. 2007. The academic citizen: The virtue of service in university life. Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mac Giolla Chríost, D. 2007. Language and the city. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makoni, S. & Pennycook, A. eds. 2007. Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Makovi, K. 2019. The signatures of social structure: Petitioning for the abolition of the slave trade in Manchester. Social Science History 43(3): 625–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, F. E. 1983. Cosmos and chaos: Celebration in the modern world. In: Manning, F. E. ed. The celebration of society: Perspectives on contemporary cultural performances. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University Press, 3–30.Google Scholar
Martin, J. & Jennings, M. 2015. Tomorrow’s museum: Multilingual audiences and the learning institution. Museums & Social Issues 10(1): 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. & Engels, F. 1848. Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei. London: Bildungs-Gesellschaft für Arbeiter von J. E. Burghard.Google Scholar
Massey, D. 1991. The political place of locality studies. Environment and Planning A 23: 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, D. 1993. Questions of locality. Geography 78(2): 142–149.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. 2009. Language contact (2nd edition 2020). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. 2010. Romani in Britain: The afterlife of a language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. 2014. ‘I met lucky people’: The story of the Romani Gypsies. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. 2015. The Romani Gypsies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. 2017a. From Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society to Romani Studies: Purpose and essence of a modern academic platform. Romani Studies 27(2): 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. 2017b. Can global cities have a language policy? Society, Languages & Policy 1(1).Google Scholar
Matras, Y. 2018a. Duly verified? Language analysis in UK asylum applications of Syrian refugees. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 25(1): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. 2018b. The Multilingual Manchester research model: An integrated approach to urban language diversity. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 14(3): 248–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. 2019. Revisiting Kurdish dialect geography: Findings from the Manchester database. In: Haig, G., Öpengin, E. & Gundoğdu, S. eds. Current issues in Kurdish linguistics. Bamberg: Bamberg University Press, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. 2021a. The standardization of a stateless language. In: Ayres-Bennett, W. & Bellamy, J. eds. The Cambridge handbook of language standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 645–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. 2021b. Process, tools and agenda in LADO: A rejoinder. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 28(2): 233–250.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. 2021c. Theorizing language contact. In: Janda, R., Joseph, B. & Vance, B. S. eds. The handbook of historical linguistics, vol. 2. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 375–392.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. & Gaiser, L. 2020. Signage as event: Deriving ‘community’ from language practice. Linguistic Landscape: An International Journal 6(2): 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y., Gaiser, L. & Reershemius, G. 2018. Multilingual repertoire management and illocutionary functions in Yiddish signage in Manchester. Journal of Pragmatics 135: 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y., Harrison, K., Gaiser, L. & Connor, S. 2022. Actors’ discourses on language supplementary schools: Diaspora practices and emerging ideologies. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. http://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.2020801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y., Jones, C. & Howley, G. 2020. Attitudes to the language and identity of Romanian Roma migrants in the UK school setting. Intercultural Education 31(3): 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. & Karatsareas, P. 2020. Non-standard and minority varieties as community languages in the UK: Towards a new strategy for language maintenance. https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/download/3fa4be6ef42c8897c1313da52024ca921b795d3453b99449306ba3ff983182f5/1137378/Non-Standard-and-Minority-Varieties-as-Community-Languages-in-the-UK-Position-Paper.pdfGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. & Leggio, D. V. 2018a. eds. Open borders, unlocked cultures: Romanian Roma migrants in Western Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. & Leggio, D. V. 2018b. Community identity and mobilization: Roma migrant experiences in Manchester. In: Matras, Y. & Leggio, D. V. eds. Open borders, unlocked cultures: Romanian Roma migrants in Western Europe. London: Routledge, 151–170.Google Scholar
Matras, Y., Leggio, D. V. & Steel, M. 2015. ‘Roma Education’ as a lucrative niche: Ideologies and representations. Zeitschrift für internationale Bildungsforschung und Entwicklungspädagogik 38: 11–17.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. & Robertson, A. 2015. Multilingualism in a post-industrial city: Policy and practice in Manchester. Current Issues in Language Planning 16(3): 296–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. & Robertson, A. 2017. Urban multilingualism and the civic university: A dynamic, non-linear model of participatory research. Social Inclusion 5(3): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y., Robertson, A. & Jones, C. 2016. Using the school setting to map community languages: A pilot study in Manchester, England. International Journal of Multilingualism 16(3): 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y., Tipton, R. & Gaiser, L. 2023. Agency and multilingualism in public health care: How practitioners draw on local experiences and encounters. In: Beeler, B., Gaibrois, C., Lecomte, P. & Vigier, M. eds. Understanding the dynamics of language and multilingualism in professional contexts: Advances in language-sensitive management research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 26–60.Google Scholar
McLelland, N. 2017. Teaching and learning foreign languages: A history of language education, assessment and policy in Britain. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, T. 2019. Language and subjectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, T. 2022. Discourse and agency of the subject in autobiographical narratives. In: Purkarthofer, J. & Flubacher, M. eds. Speaking subjects in multilingualism research: Biographical and speaker-centred approaches. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, T. & Schüpbach, D. 2018. Fairness and justice in language analysis for the determination of origin of asylum seekers (LADO). In: Nick, I. M. ed. Forensic linguistics: Asylum-seekers, refugees and immigrants. Wilmington, NC: Vernon Press, 155–174.Google Scholar
Menken, K. & García, O. 2010. Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policy makers. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, S., Sumartojo, S., Closs Stephens, A. & Coward, M. 2020. Togetherness after terror: The more or less digital commemorative public atmospheres of the Manchester Arena bombing’s first anniversary. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38(3): 546–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignolo, W. D. 2011. The dark side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mignolo, W. D. & Walsh, C. E. 2018. On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Milani, T. M. & Jonsson, R. 2018. Linguistic citizenship in Sweden: (De)constructing languages in a context of linguistic human rights. In: Lim, L., Stroud, C. & Wee, L. eds. The multilingual citizen: Towards a politics of language for agency and change. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 221–246.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. 2021. Imperial nostalgia: How the British conquered themselves. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. 2010. Current issues in heritage language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 30: 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, P. 2021. Imperial nostalgia: How the British conquered themselves. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. 2012. Is the heritage language like a second language? EUROSLA Yearbook 12(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moosmüller, S. 2010. IAFPA position on language analysis in asylum procedures. In: Zwaan, K., Verrips, M. & Muysken, P. eds. Language and origin – The role of language in European asylum procedures: Linguistic and legal perspectives. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 43–47.Google Scholar
Mora, L., Bolici, R. & Deakin, M. 2017. The first two decades of smart-city research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Urban Technology 24(1): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. 2020. Decolonial linguistics as paradigm shift: A commentary. In: Deumert, A., Storch, A. & Shepherd, N. eds. Colonial and decolonial linguistics: Knowledges and epistemes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, M. 2021. Worlding geography: From linguistic privilege to decolonial anywheres. Progress in Human Geography 45(6): 1440–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulroy, E. 2004. University civic engagement with community-based organizations. Journal of Community Practice 12(3–4): 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, P. 2019. Language and origin: The perspective of multilingualism. In: Patrick, P., Schmid, M. S. & Zwaan, K. eds. Language analysis for the determination of origin: Current perspectives and new directions. Cham: Springer, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neary, M. 2020. Civic university or university of the earth? A call for intellectual insurgency. Civic Sociology 1(1): https://doi.org/10.1525/001c.14518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neather, R. 2012. ‘Non-expert’ translators in a professional community: Identity, anxiety and perceptions of translator expertise in the Chinese museum community. The Translator 18(2): 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ngai, K. M., Grudzen, C. R., Lee, R., Tong, V. Y., Richardson, L. D. & Fernandez, A. 2016. The association between limited English proficiency and unplanned emergency department revisit within 72 hours. Annals of Emergency Medicine 682: 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, F. 2012. Degrees of freedom in speech production: An argument for native speakers in LADO. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 19(2): 263–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, A. 2011. Introduction: Worlding cities, or the art of being global. In: Roy, A & Ong, A. eds. Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–26.Google Scholar
Öpengin, E. & Haig, G. 2014. Regional variation in Kurmanji: A preliminary classification of dialects. Kurdish Studies 2(2): 143–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osman, M. F. 2006. Language choice among Arabic-English bilinguals in Manchester. MA dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Ottoviano, G. I. P. & Peri, G. 2006. The economic value of cultural diversity: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Economic Geography 6: 9–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panayi, P. 2010. An immigration history of Britain: Multicultural racism since 1800. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pappenhagen, R., Scarvaglieri, C. & Redder, A. 2016. Expanding the linguistic landscape scenery? Action theory and ‘linguistic landscaping’. In: Blackwood, R., Lanza, E. & Woldemariam, H. eds. Negotiating and contesting identities in linguistic landscapes. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 147–162.Google Scholar
Parkin, D. 2016. From multilingual classification to translingual ontology: A turning point. In: Arnaut, K., Blommaert, J., Rampton, B. & Spotti, M. eds. Language and superdiversity. New York: Routledge, 71–88.Google Scholar
Patrick, P. L. 2012. Language Analysis for Determination of Origin: Objective evidence for refugee status determination. In: Solan, L. & Tiersma, P. eds. The Oxford handbook of language and law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 533–546.Google Scholar
Patrick, P. L. 2016. The impact of sociolinguistics on refugee status determination. In: Lawson, R. & Sayers, D. eds. Sociolinguistic research: Application and impact. London: Routledge, 235–256.Google Scholar
Peck, J. & Ward, K. 2002a. Placing Manchester. In: Peck, J. & Ward, K. eds. City of revolution: Restructuring Machester. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1–17.Google Scholar
Peck, J. & Ward, K. eds. 2002b. City of revolution: Restructuring Manchester. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. & Otsuji, E. 2015. Metrolingualism: Language in the city. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillimore, J. 2015. Delivering maternity services in an age of superdiversity: The challenges of novelty and newness. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38(4): 568–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, R. & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. 1995. Linguistic rights and wrongs. Applied Linguistics 16(4): 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pidgeon, M. 2016. More than a checklist: Meaningful indigenous inclusion in higher education. Social Inclusion 4(1): 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. 2016. Linguistic diversity and social justice: An introduction to applied sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. 2020. Covid-19 forces us to take linguistic diversity seriously. In: Boomgaarden, G. ed. 12 Perspectives on the Pandemic: International thought leaders reflect on Covid-19. Berlin: De Gruyter, 12–17.Google Scholar
Piller, I., Zhang, J. & Jia, L. 2020. Linguistic diversity in a time of crisis: Language challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. Multilingua 39(5): 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinarbasi, S. 2020. Manchester antislavery, 1792–1807. Slavery & Abolition 41(2): 349–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. 2018. Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. & Dayson, K. 2013. Engagement and the idea of the civic university. In: Benneworth, P. ed. University engagement with socially excluded communities. Dordrecht: Springer, 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M. L. 1991. Arts of the contact zone. Profession 91: 33–40.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. L. 2003. Building a new public idea about language. Profession 1: 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. R. 2019. Trouble in LADO-land: How the brain deceives the ear. In: Patrick, P., Schmid, M. S. & Zwaan, K. eds. Language analysis for the determination of origin: Current perspectives and new directions. Cham: Springer, 131–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokofyeva, T. 2018. Linguistic origin identification in focus: Theory and practice in LOID. In: Nick, I. M. ed. Forensic linguistics: Asylum-seekers, refugees and immigrants. Wilmington, NC: Vernon Press, 41–55.Google Scholar
Purcell, M. 2013. Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs 36(1): 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purkarthofer, J. 2016. Sprachort Schule: Zur Konstruktion von mehrsprachigen sozialen Räumen und Praktiken in einer zweisprachigen Volksschule. Klagenfurt: Drava.Google Scholar
Purkarthofer, J. 2022. And the subject speaks to you: Biographical narratives as memories and stories of the narrative self. In: Purkarthofer, J. & Flubacher, M. eds. Speaking subjects in multilingualism research: Biographical and speaker-centred approaches. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 3–20.Google Scholar
Purkarthofer, J. & Flubacher, M., eds. 2022. Speaking subjects in multilingualism research: Biographical and speaker-centred approaches. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 1995. Crossing: Language and identity among adolescents. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. 2010. Linguistic ethnography, interactional sociolinguistics and the study of identities: Applied linguistics: A reader. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rampton, B., Cooke, M. & Holmes, S. 2018. Sociolinguistic citizenship. Journal of Social Science Education 17(4): 68–83.Google Scholar
Rampton, B., Cooke, M., Leung, C., Tomei, A., Bryers, D., Winstanley, B. & Holmes, S. 2021. Localising linguistic citizenship. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies 292.Google Scholar
Rampton, B., Leung, C. & Cooke, M. 2020. Education, England and users of languages other than English. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies 275.Google Scholar
Rappaport, R. A. 1999. Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redder, A., Pauli, J., Kießling, R., Bührig, K., Brehmer, B., Breckner, I. & Androuttsopoulos, J. 2013. Mehrsprachige Kommunikation in der Stadt. Münster: Waxman.Google Scholar
Rehbein, J. 2013. The future of multilingualism: Towards a HELIX of societal multilingualism and global auspices. In: Bührig, K. & Meyer, B. eds. Transferring linguistic know-how into institutional practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 43–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricento, T. 2005. Problems with the ‘language-as-resource’ discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the USA. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9(3): 348–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, D. 2018. The left’s Jewish problem: Jeremy Corbyn, Israel and antisemitism. London: Biteback.Google Scholar
Robson, B. 2002. Mancunian ways: The politics of regeneration. In: Peck, J. & Ward, K. eds. City of revolution: Restructuring Manchester. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 34–49.Google Scholar
Rose, M. M. 2016. Voices of the people. In: Kidd, A. & Wyke, T. eds. Manchester: Making the modern city. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 171–211.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. R & Bousquette, J. 2018. Heritage languages in North America: Sociolinguistic approaches. Journal of Language Contact 11: 201–207.Google Scholar
Rusu, M. S. & Kantola, I. 2016. A time of meta-celebration: Celebrating the sociology of celebration. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology 7(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Safran, W. 1991. Diasporas in modern societies: Myths of homeland and return. Diaspora 1(1): 83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, E. 1978. Orientalism. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sanghera, S. 2021. Empireland: How imperialism had shaped modern Britain. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 1991. The global city. New York: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 2005. The global city: Introducing a concept. Brown Journal of World Affairs 11(2): 27–43.Google Scholar
Scanlan, P. X. 2020. Slave empire: How slavery built modern Britain. London: Robinson.Google Scholar
Schenker, Y., Pérez-Stable, E. J., Nickleach, D. & Karliner, L. S. 2011. Patterns of interpreter use for hospitalized patients with limited English proficiency. Journal of General Internal Medicine 26(7): 712–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiller, M. 2015. Paradigmatic pragmatism and the politics of diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38(7): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, M. 2016. European cities, municipal organizations and diversity: The new politics of difference. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, M., Elroy, I. & Elmakais, I. 2016. We are lost: Measuring the accessibility of signage in public general hospitals. Language Policy 1(16): 23–38.Google Scholar
Sebba, M. 2018. Awkward questions: Language issues in the 2011 census in England. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 39(2): 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shek, D. T. L. & Hollister, R. M. eds. 2017. University social responsibility and quality of life: A global survey of concepts and experiences. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sian, K. P. 2019. Navigating institutional racism in British universities. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. & Phillipson, R. eds. 2017. Language rights, vol. 1. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soto Huerta, M. E. & Huerta Migus, L. 2015. Creating equitable ecologies: Broadening access through multilingualism. Museums and Social Issues 10(1): 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, G. C. 1993. Can the subaltern speak? In: Williams, P. & Chrisman, L. eds. Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader. New York: Colombia University Press, 66–111.Google Scholar
Spotti, M. 2016. Sociolinguistic Shibboleths at the institutional gates: Language, origin and the construction of asylum seekers’ identities. In: Arnaut, K., Blommaert, J., Rampton, B. & Spotti, M. eds. Language and superdiversity. London: Routledge, 261–278.Google Scholar
Stevenson, P. 2017. Language and migration in a multilingual metropolis: Berlin lives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, M. 2017. Nothing about us without us, or the dangers of a closed society research paradigm. Romani Studies 27(2): 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C. 2001. African mother-tongue programmes and the politics of language: Linguistic citizenship versus linguistic human rights. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 22(4): 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C. 2008. Bilingualism: Colonialism and post-colonialism. In: Heller, M. ed. Bilingualism: A social approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 25–49.Google Scholar
Stroud, C. 2018. Linguistic citizenship. In: Lim, L., Stroud, C. & Wee, L. eds. The multilingual citizen: Towards a politics of language for agency and change. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 17–39.Google Scholar
Stroud, C. & Kerfoot, C. 2021. Decolonizing higher education: Multilingualism, linguistic citizenship and epistemic justice. In: Bock, Z. & Stroud, C. eds. Language and decoloniality in higher education: Reclaiming voices from the south. London: Bloomsbury, 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C. & Williams, Q. 2017. Multilingualism as utopia: Fashioning non-racial selves. AILA Review 30: 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syrett, S. & Sepulveda, L. 2011. Realising the diversity dividend: Population diversity and urban economic development. Environment and Planning 43: 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, E. K. 2017. A rhizomatic account of heritage language. In: Canagarajah, S. ed. The Routledge handbook of migration and language. London: Routledge, 468–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ten Thije, D. & Zeevart, L. eds. 2007. Receptive multilingualism: Linguistic analyses, language policies and didactic concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinsley, T. 2018. Languages in English secondary schools post-Brexit. In: Kelly, M. eds. Languages after Brexit. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tipton, R. 2019. Exploring the ESOL–PSIT relation: Interpellation, resistance and resilience. Language & Communication 67: 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, J. 1999. Globalization and culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tönnies, F. [1887] 2001. Community and civil society. In: Harris, J. ed. Cambridge texts in the history of political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuhiwai Smith, L. T. [1999] 2021. Decolonising methodologies (3rd edition). London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallance, P. 2016. The historical roots and development of the civic university. In: Goddard, J., Hazelkorn, E., Kempton, L. & Vallance, P. eds. The civic university: The policy and leadership challenges. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 16–33.Google Scholar
Vanolo, A. 2014. Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies 51(5): 883–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, L. & Penn, A. 2006. Jewish immigrant settlement patterns in Manchester and Leeds 1881. Urban Studies 43(3): 653–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veronelli, G. A. 2015. The coloniality of language: Race, expressivity, power, and the darker side of modernity. Wagadu: A Journal of Transnational Women’s & Gender Studies 13: 108–134.Google Scholar
Verrips, M. 2010. Language analysis and contra-expertise in the Dutch asylum procedure. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law 17(2): 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verrips, M. 2011. LADO and the pressure to draw strong conclusions: A response to Tina Cambier–Langeveld. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law 18(1): 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertovec, S. 2007. Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(6): 1024–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, K., Deas, I., Haughton, G. & Hincks, S. 2015. Placing Greater Manchester. Representation 51(4): 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. 2008. The university in the modern world. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 3(1): 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattendorf, E., Festman, J., Westermann, B., Keil, U., Zappatore, D., Franceschini, R., Luedi, G., Radue, E.-W., Münte, T. F., Rager, G. & Nitsch, C. 2014. Early bilingualism influences early and subsequently later acquired languages in cortical regions representing control functions. International Journal of Bilingualism 18(1): 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werbner, P. 1979. Avoiding the ghetto: Pakistani migrants and settlement shifts in Manchester. New Community 7(3): 376–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werbner, P. 1980. From rags to riches: Manchester Pakistanis in the textile trade. New Community 8(1–2): 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werbner, P. 2002. The place which is diaspora: Citizenship, religion and gender in the making of chaordic transnationalism. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 28(1): 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, B. W. ed. 2018. Intercultural cities: Policy and practice for a new era. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, F. & Howard, A. 2008. Disrobing the Aboriginal industry: The deception behind indigenous cultural preservation. Montreal: McGill Queen’s University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, H., Alexiadou, A., Allen, S., Bunk, O., Gagarina, N., Iefremenko, K., Martynova, M., Pashkova, T., Rizou, V., Schroeder, C., Shadrova, A., Szucsich, L., Tracy, R., Tsehaye, W., Zerbian, S. & Zuban, Y. 2022. Heritage speakers as part of the native language continuum. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 717973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiese, H. & Kerswill, P. eds. 2022. Urban contact dialects and language change: Insights from the Global North and South. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wiley, T. G. 2001. On defining heritage languages and their speakers. In: Peyton, J., Ranard, D. A. & McGinnis, S. eds. Heritage languages in America: Preserving a national resource. Washington, DC & McHenry, IL: Center for Applied Linguistics & Delta Systems, 29–36.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1979. The Jewish immigrant in Manchester: The contribution of oral history. Oral History 7(1): 43–53.Google Scholar
Williams, G. 2003. The enterprising city centre: Manchester’s development challenge. London: Spon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. & Savski, K. 2018. Critical discourse-ethnographic approaches to language policy. In: Tollefson, J. W. & Pérez-Milans, M. eds. The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 93–112.Google Scholar
Woldeyes, Y. G. & Offord, B. 2018. Decolonizing human rights education: Critical pedagogy praxis in higher education. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives 17(1): 24–36.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. R. 1966. Peasants. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Wong, C. 2015. A framework for ‘city prosperity index’: Linking indicators, analysis and policy. Habitat International 45: 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, C., Baker, M., Webb, B., Hincks, S. & Schulze-Baing, A. 2015. Mapping policies and programmes: The use of GIS to communicate spatial relationships in England. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 42: 1020–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X. & Oldfield, P. 2015. How ‘civic’ the trend developed in the histories of the universities. Open Journal of Social Sciences 3(6): 11–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyke, T. 2016. Rise and decline of Cottonopolis. In: Kidd, A. & Wyke, T. eds. Manchester: Making the modern city. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 69–117.Google Scholar
Young, C., Diep, M. & Drabble, S. 2006. Living with difference? The ‘cosmopolitan city’ and urban reimaging in Manchester, UK. Urban Studies 43(10): 1687–1714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar