Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-888d5979f-g2njx Total loading time: 0.842 Render date: 2021-10-27T09:46:15.407Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

19 - GIS and GPS Techniques in an Ethnoprimatological Investigation of St Kitts Green Monkey (Chlorocebus sabaeus) Crop-Foraging Behavior

from Part III - GIS Analysis in Broad-Scale Space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2021

Francine L. Dolins
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Dearborn
Christopher A. Shaffer
Affiliation:
Grand Valley State University, Michigan
Leila M. Porter
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University
Jena R. Hickey
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Nathan P. Nibbelink
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
Get access

Summary

Over 350 years ago, the ecology of St Kitts, an island in the West Indies, was dramatically altered when Europeans arrived. The English and later French introduced sugar cane production, brought in a large African slave workforce, and (unintentionally) introduced a highly intelligent and adaptable invasive animal species, the green monkey (Chlorocebus sabaeus). Ever since green monkeys arrived in St Kitts, they have thrived on the island, in part by foraging on farmers’ crops. In this chapter, we utilize GIS and GPS techniques to generate a predictive model of this crop-foraging behavior. Additionally, we use ethnographic techniques to understand the nuanced ways in which historic land use changes in St Kitts have altered green monkey movements, and, in turn, Kittitians’ cultural conceptualization of monkeys. Our work shows the benefits of utilizing an ethnoprimatological framework and combining quantitative and qualitative data collection techniques in assessing human–nonhuman primate (NHP) conflict situations, which are inherently highly spatial in nature.

Type
Chapter
Information
Spatial Analysis in Field Primatology
Applying GIS at Varying Scales
, pp. 403 - 427
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beyer, H. L. 2004. Hawth’s analysis tools for ArcGIS. Available at www.spatialecology.com/htools.Google Scholar
Chapman, C. A. 1985. The influence of habitat on behavior in a group of St. Kitts green monkeys. Journal of Zoology, London 206: 311320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A. 1987. Selection of secondary growth areas by vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). American Journal of Primatology 12: 217221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A. and Fedigan, L. M. 1984. Territoriality in the St. Kitts vervet, Cercopithecus aethiops. Journal of Human Evolution 13: 677686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A., Fedigan, L. M., and Fedigan, L. 1988. Ecological and demographic influences on the pattern of association in St. Kitts vervets. Primates 29: 417421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormier, L. A. 2002. Monkey as food, monkey as child: Guaja symbolic cannibalism. Pages 6384 in Primates Face to Face: The Conservation Implications of Human and Nonhuman Primate Interconnections. Fuentes, A. and Wolfe, L. D.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormier, L. A. 2003. Kinship with Monkeys: The Guaja Foragers of Eastern Amazonia. Columbia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, K. M. 2013. An anthropological investigation of the dynamic human–vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) interface in St. Kitts, West Indies. Dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Dore, K. M. 2017. Navigating the methodological landscape: ethnographic data expose the nuances of “the monkey problem” in St. Kitts, West Indies. Pages 219231 in Ethnoprimatology: A Practical Guide to Research at the Human–Nonhuman Primate Interface. Dore, K. M., Riley, E. P., and Fuentes, A.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, K. M. 2018. Ethnoprimatology without conservation: the political ecology of farmer-green monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) relations in St. Kitts, West Indies. International Journal of Primatology 39: 918944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, K. M., Eller, A. R., Eller, J. L. 2018. Identity construction and symbolic association in farmer–vervet monkey (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus) interconnections in St. Kitts. Folia Primatologica 89: 6380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairbanks, L. A. and Bird, J. 1978. Ecological correlates of interindividual distance in the St. Kitts vervet (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). Primates 19: 605614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, A. 2006. Human–nonhuman primate interconnections and their relevance to anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology 2(2): 111.Google Scholar
Fuentes, A. 2012. Ethnoprimatology and the anthropology of the human–primate interface. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 101117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, A. and Hockings, K. 2010. The ethnoprimatological approach in primatology. American Journal of Primatology 72: 841847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuentes, A. and Wolfe, L. 2002. Primates Face to Face: Conservation Implications of Human–Nonhuman Primate Interconnections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillingham, S. and Lee, P. C. 2003. People and protected areas: a study of local perceptions of wildlife crop-damage conflict in an area bordering the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Oryx 3: 316325.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. and Remis, M. J. 2006. Biological and cultural anthropology of a changing tropical forest: a fruitful collaboration across subfields. American Anthropologist 108: 273285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashim, N. R., Abdul Manan, M. S., and Nazli, M. F. 2009. Using geographic information system to predict primate crop raiding in peninsular Malaysia. IUP Journal of Environmental Sciences 3(4): 3946.Google Scholar
Helmer, E. H., Kennaway, T. A., Pedreros, D. H., et al. 2008. Land cover and forest formation distributions for St. Kitts, Nevis, St. Eustatius, Grenada and Barbados from decision tree classification of cloud-cleared satellite imagery. Caribbean Journal of Science 44: 175198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. M. 1997. Crop-raiding by wild vertebrates: the farmer’s perspective in an agricultural community in western Uganda. International Journal of Pest Management 43: 7784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. M. 2000. Conflict of interest between people and baboons: crop raiding in Uganda. International Journal of Primatology 21: 299315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, C. M. and Webber, A. D. 2010. Perceptions of nonhuman primates in human–wildlife conflict scenarios. American Journal of Primatology 72: 919924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Y. and Nelder, J. A. 1996. Hierarchical generalized linear models with discussion. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 58: 619678.Google Scholar
Linkie, M., Dinata, Y., Nofrianto, A., and Leader-Williams, N. 2007. Patterns and perceptions of wildlife crop raiding in and around Kerinci Seblat National Park, Sumatra. Animal Conservation 10: 127135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maples, W. R., Maples, M. K., Greenhood, W. F., and Walek, M. L. 1976. Adaptations of crop-raiding baboons in Kenya. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 45: 309316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, M. T. 1974. The St. Kitts Vervet. Karger, New York.Google ScholarPubMed
Naughton-Treves, L. 1996. Uneasy neighbors: wildlife and farmers around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Dissertation. University of Florida.Google Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L. 1997. Farming the forest edge: vulnerable places and people around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Geographical Review 87: 2746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L. 1998. Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conservation Biology 12: 156169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L., Treves, A., Chapman, C., and Wrangham, R. 1998. Temporal patterns of crop-raiding by primates: linking food availability in croplands and adjacent forest. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 596606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, W. D., Manyanza, D. N., Gamassa, D.-G. M., and Sariko, H. I. 1994. The conflict between wildlife and local people living adjacent to protected areas in Tanzania: human density as a predictor. Conservation Biology 8: 249255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijman, V. and Nekaris, K. A. I. 2010. Testing a model for predicting primate crop-raiding using crop- and farm-specific risk values. Animal Behaviour Science 127: 125129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, J. and Wallis, J. 2005. Commensalism and Conflict: The Primate–Human Interface. American Society of Primatologists, Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Perkins, N. J. and Schisterman, E. F. 2006. The inconsistency of “optimal” cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. American Journal of Epidemiology 163: 670675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petto, A. J. and Povinelli, D. J. 1985. Some preliminary observations of vervets (Cercopithecus aethiops) from the Greatheeds Pond Area on St. Kitts, WI. Canadian Journal of Anthropology 4(2): 7781.Google Scholar
Poirier, F. E. 1972. The St. Kitts green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus): ecology, population dynamics, and selected behavioral traits. Folia Primatologica 17: 2055.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priston, N. E. C. 2005. Crop raiding by Macaca ochreata brunnescens in Sulawesi: reality, perceptions and outcomes for conservation. Dissertation. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Priston, N. E. C. and Underdown, S. J. 2009. A simple method for calculating the likelihood of crop damage by primates: an epidemiological approach. International Journal of Pest Management 55: 5156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.Google Scholar
Riley, E. P. 2007. The human–macaque interface: conservation implications of current and future overlap and conflict in Lore Lindu National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Anthropologist 109: 473484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, E. P. and Priston, N. E. C. 2010. Macaques in farms and folklore: exploring the human–nonhuman primate interface in Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology 72: 848854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rönnegård, L., Shen, X., and Alam, M. 2010. HGLM: a package for fitting hierarchical generalized linear models. R Journal 2(2): 2028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sade, D. S. and Hildrech, R. W. 1965. Notes on the green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus) on St. Kitts, West Indies. Caribbean Journal of Science 5: 6781.Google Scholar
Siex, K. S. and Struhsaker, T. T. 1999. Colobus monkeys and coconuts: a study of perceived human–wildlife conflicts. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 10091020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitati, N. W., Walpole, M. J., Smith, R. J., and Leader-Williams, N. 2003. Predicting spatial aspects of human–elephant conflict. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 667677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strum, S. C. 1994. Prospects for managing primate pests. Revue d’Ecologie: La Terre et la Vie 49: 295306.Google Scholar
Tweyho, M., Hill, C. M., and Obua, J. 2005. Patterns of crop raiding by primates around the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda. Wildlife Biology 11: 327347.Google Scholar
Warren, Y., Buba, B., and Ross, C. 2007. Patterns of crop-raiding near a Nigerian National Park. International Journal of Pest Management 53: 207216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, A. D. 2006. Primate crop raiding in Uganda: actual and perceived risks around Budongo Forest Reserve. Dissertation. Oxford Brookes University.Google Scholar
Wheatley, B. P. 1999. The Sacred Monkeys of Bali. Waveland, Prospect Heights, NY.Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×