Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T15:12:26.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

Edited by
Hent Kalmo  and
Quentin Skinner
Hent Kalmo
Affiliation:
Université de Paris X-Nanterre
Quentin Skinner
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Sovereignty in Fragments
The Past, Present and Future of a Contested Concept
 , pp. 243 - 263
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelin, J.P. (1635–1738). Theatrum Europaeum, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio (2005). State of Exception, trans. Kevin Attell, Chicago.
Agamben, Giorgio (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Heller-Roazen, Daniel, Stanford.Google Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio (2008). Le règne et la gloire. Homo Sacer II.2, Paris.
Albi, Anneli (2008). ‘Ironies in Human Rights Protection in the EU: Pre-Accession Conditionality and Post-Accession Conundrums’, European Law Journal 15, pp. 46–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto and Spolaore, Enrico (2003). The Size of Nations, Boston.Google Scholar
Allan, T.R.S. (1997). ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty: Law, Politics, and Revolution’, Law Quarterly Review 113, pp. 443–52.Google Scholar
Almain, Jacques (1706). Tractatus de autoritate ecclesiae in Jean Gerson, Opera Omnia, ed. Pin, Louis Ellies du, 5 vols., Antwerp, vol. ii, cols. 976–1012.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. (2002). Establishing the Supremacy of European Law. The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe, Oxford.Google Scholar
Angell, Norman (1914). The Foundations of International Polity, London.Google Scholar
Ankersmit, F.R. (2007). ‘Political Representation and Political Experience: An Essay on Political Psychology’, Redescriptions 11, pp. 21–44.Google Scholar
,Anon. (1647). ‘Manifest Oder Summarischer Bericht [1644]’ in Theatrum Europaeum, ed. Abelin, J.P., Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Aquinas, St Thomas (1964–1981). Summa Theologiae, London and New York.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, New York.Google Scholar
Arienzo, Alessandro (2004). ‘Dalla corporate governance alla categoria politica di governance’ in Governance, ed. Borelli, Gianfranco, Naples, pp. 125–62.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Kenneth (2003). ‘United Kingdom – Divided on Sovereignty’ in Sovereignty in Transition, ed. Walker, Neil, Oxford, pp. 327–50.Google Scholar
Ashley, R.K. and Walker, R.B.J. (1990). ‘Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline. Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies’, International Studies Quarterly 34, pp. 367–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augustine, , St (1998). The City of God Against the Pagans, ed. R.W. Dyson, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Austin, John (1995). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, ed. Rumble, Wilfrid E., Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, Balthazar (1912). De jure et officiis bellicis et disciplina militari, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Badinter, Robert (2003). Une constitution européenne, Paris.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Geoffrey (2004). ‘Reason of State and English Parliaments, 1610–42’, History of Political Thought 25, pp. 620–41.Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens (1995a). A Genealogy of Sovereignty, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelson, Jens (1995b). ‘The Trial of Judgment: A Note on Kant and the Paradoxes of Internationalism’, International Studies Quarterly 39, pp. 255–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelson, Jens (1996). ‘Short Circuits: Society and Tradition in International Relations Theory’, Review of International Studies 22, pp. 339–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelson, Jens (2001). The Critique of the State, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bast, Jürgen (2003). On the Grammar of EU Law: Legal Instruments, New York University, Jean Monnet Working Paper 9/2003.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean (1988). Selected Writings, ed. Poster, Mark, Stanford.Google Scholar
Baumgold, Deborah (1988). Hobbes's Political Theory, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baumgold, Deborah (1993). ‘Pacifying Politics: Resistance, Violence and Accountability in Seventeenth-Century Contract Theory’, Political Theory 21, pp. 6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaud, Olivier (2007). Théorie de la fédération, Paris.Google Scholar
Beaulac, Stéphane (2003a). The Power of Language in the Making of International Law, Leiden.Google Scholar
Beaulac, Stéphane (2003b). ‘Emer de Vattel and the Externalization of Sovereignty’, Journal of the History of International Law 5, pp. 237–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behnen, Michael (1986). ‘Der gerechte und der notwendige Krieg. “Necessitas” und “Utilitas reipublicae” in der Kriegstheorie des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts’ in Staatsverfassung und Heeresverfassung in der europäischen Geschichte der frühen Neuzeit, ed. Kunisch, J., Berlin, pp. 43–106.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Richard (2000). Rethinking Liberalism, London and New York.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Richard (2003). ‘Sovereignty, Post-Sovereignty and Pre-Sovereignty: Three Models of the State, Democracy and Rights within the EU’ in Sovereignty in Transition, ed. Walker, Neil, Oxford, pp. 167–89.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Richard (2007). Political Constitutionalism. A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Marc (2007). ‘The “Rule of Law” Means Literally What it Says: the Rule of the Law: Fuller and Raz on Formal Legality and the Concept of Law’, Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 32, pp. 90–113.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy (1970). Of Laws in General, ed. Hart, H.L.A., London.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy (1988). A Fragment on Government, ed. Burns, J.H. and Hart, H.L.A., intro. Harrison, Ross, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, Samantha (2005). ‘Review of Walker, N. (ed.). “Sovereignty in Transition”’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 3, pp. 147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevir, Mark (2008). ‘What is Genealogy’, Journal of the Philosophy of History 2, pp. 263–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhuta, Nehal (2005). ‘The Antinomies of Transformative Occupation’, 16 European Journal of International Law, pp. 721–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, C.J., Cunliffe, P. and Gourevitch, A. (eds.) (2007). Politics without Sovereignty, London.
Blaau, Loammi C. (1990). ‘The Rechtsstaat Idea Compared with the Rule of Law as a Paradigm for Protecting Rights’, South African Law Journal 107, pp. 76–96.Google Scholar
Blackstone, Sir William (1765). Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. i: Of the Rights of Persons, Oxford.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William (1979). Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–1769), Chicago.Google Scholar
Blecher, Michael (2006). ‘Law in Movement. Paradoxontology, Law and Social Movements’ in Human Rights and Capitalism, ed. Dine, Janet and Fagan, Andrew, Cheltenham, pp. 80–114.Google Scholar
Boccalini, Traiano (1626). The new found politike, trans. Vaughan, William.
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang (1991). ‘The Origin and Development of the Concept of the Rechtsstaat’ in State, Society and Liberty, New York, pp. 47–70.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean (1951). Oeuvres philosophiques de Jean Bodin – texte établi, translated and published by Mesnard, P., Paris.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean (1962). The Six Bookes of a Commonweale, ed. McRae, Kenneth D., Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, Jean (1986). Les six livres de la République, ed. Fremont, Christiane, Couzinet, Marie-Dominique and Rochais, Henri, Paris.Google Scholar
Bodin, Jean (1992). On Sovereignty: Four Chapters from The Six Books of the Commonwealth, ed. Franklin, Julian H., Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borelli, Gianfranco (1993). Ragion di stato e Leviatano, Bologna.Google Scholar
Borradori, Giovanna (2003). Philosophy and Terror. Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, Bernard (1910). The Philosophical Theory of the State, 2nd edn, London.Google Scholar
Botero, Giovanni (1630). Relations of the most famous kingdomes and common-wealths thorowout the world, trans. Johnson, Robert, London.Google Scholar
Boucher, David and Vincent, Andrew (2000). British Idealism and Political Theory, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bozeman, Adda (1984). ‘The International Order in a Multicultural World’ in The Expansion of International Society, ed. Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, Oxford, pp. 387–406.Google Scholar
Bramhall, John (1643). The Serpent Salve, n.p.
Brett, Annabel S. (1997). Liberty, Right and Nature: Individual Rights in Later Scholastic Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bröckling, U., Krasmann, S. and Lemke, Th. (2000). Gouvermentalität der Gegenwart. Studien zur Ökonomisierung des Sozialen, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Brownlie, Ian (1998). Principles of Public International Law, 5th edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, Hauke (2004). ‘The Right to War: Hegemonial Geopolitics or Civic Constitutionalism’, Constellations 11, pp. 512–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsson, Nils (1989). The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organization, Chichester.Google Scholar
Bryce, James (1901). ‘The Nature of Sovereignty’ in Studies in History and Jurisprudence, vol. ii, Oxford, pp. 49–111.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1990). ‘The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations’ in Hugo Grotius and International Relations, ed. Bull, Hedley and Roberts, Adam, Oxford, pp. 65–93.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley (1995). The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics, Houndmills, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Burke-White, W.W. (2002). ‘A Community of Courts: Toward a System of International Criminal Law Enforcement?’, Michigan Journal of International Law 24, pp. 1–102.Google Scholar
Burns, J.H. (1989). ‘Bentham and Blackstone: A Lifetime's Dialectic’, Utilitas: A Journal of UtilitarianStudies 1, pp. 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J.H. (1992). Lordship, Kingship and Empire: The Idea of Monarchy 1400–1525, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bynkershoek, Cornelis (1930). Quaestiones juris publici, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cairns, John W. (1984). ‘Blackstone, an English Institutionalist: Legal Literature and the Rise of the Nation State’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 4, pp. 318–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calhoun, Laurie (2002). ‘Legitimate Authority and “Just War” in the Modern World’, Peace & Change 27, pp. 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caney, Simon (2005). Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canning, Joseph (1987). The Political Thought of Baldus de Ubaldis, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carré de Malberg, Raymond (1920–1922). Contribution à la Théorie générale de l'Etat, Paris.Google Scholar
Cassese, Sabino (2002). La crisi dello stato, Rome and Bari.Google Scholar
,Center for Global Development (2003). Challenging Foreign Aid: A Policymaker's Guide to the Millennium Challenge Account.
Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia H. (1995). The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Christopher, Paul (1994). The Ethics of War and Peace. An Introduction to Legal and Moral Issues, Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
Cocco, Giuseppe and Negri, Antonio (2006). GlobAL, biopotere e lotte in America Latina, Rome.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly (1999). Normative Theory in International Relations. A Pragmatic Approach, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jean (2004). ‘Whose Sovereignty? Empire versus International Law’, Ethics & International Affairs 18, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Samy (2006). The Resilience of the State, London.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul (2007). The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries are Failing and What Can Be Done About It, New York.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R.G. (1989). Essays in Political Philosophy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Combacau, Jean (2000). ‘La souveraineté internationale de l’État dans la jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel français', Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel, no. 9, pp. 113–8.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robert (2003). The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-first Century, New York.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J. (1990). Capacity and Volition. A History of the Distinction between Absolute and Ordained Power, Pergamo.Google Scholar
Cox, Michael (2004). ‘Empire, Imperialism, and the Bush Doctrine’, Review of International Studies 30, pp. 585–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Paul (2001). ‘Constitutions, Constitutionalism and the European Union’, European Law Journal 7, pp. 125–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James (2006). The Creation of States in International Law, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Creveld, Martin (1999). The Rise and Decline of the State, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agents, Crown (n.d.). Mozambique Customs Reform Programme 1997–2006, London.
Dahbour, O. (2006). ‘Advocating Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization’, Journal of Social Philosophy 37, pp. 108–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, James (1971). ‘John Bramhall and the Theoretical Problems of Royalist Moderation’, The Journal of British Studies 11, pp. 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Ernesto (2007). Sovranità in frammenti: La semantica del potere in Michel Foucault e Niklas Luhmann, Verona.Google Scholar
Defoe, Daniel (1786). The History of the Union between England and Scotland, London.Google Scholar
Luca, Luigi (1946). Stato e Chiesa nel pensiero politico di G. Botero, Rome.Google Scholar
Del Vecchio, Giorgio (1935). La Crise de l'État, Paris.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles (1992). ‘What is a dispositif?’ in Michel Foucault, Philosopher, ed. Armstrong, Timothy, New York, pp. 159–68.Google Scholar
Denzer, Horst (1972). Moralphilosophie und Naturrecht bei Samuel Pufendorf, Munich.Google Scholar
,Department for International Development (DfID) (2004). ‘Proxy List of Fragile States’ in Why We Need to Work More Effectively in Fragile States.
Derathé, Robert (1988). Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la science politique de son temps, 2nd edn, Paris.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G. (1996). Dealing in Virtue. International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order, Chicago.Google Scholar
Dicey, Albert Venn (1959). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 10th edn, Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Dickmann, Fritz (1971). Friedensrecht und Friedenssicherung, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Dickmann, FritzDigest of Justinian (1985). Ed. Mommsen, Theodor and Krueger, Paul, ed. and trans. Watson, Alan, 4 vols., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Döring, Detlef (1995). Samuel Pufendorf: Kleine Vorträge und Schriften, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Downing, Calybute (1634). A Discourse of the State Ecclesiasticall of this Kingdome, in relation to the Civill, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael (1986). Empires, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Duchhardt, Heinz (2000). ‘War and International Law in Europe: Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries’ in War and Competition Between States, ed. Contamine, P., Oxford, pp. 279–99.Google Scholar
Duhamel, Olivier (2003). ‘Discussion with Ph. De Villiers on the European Constitution’, Le Figaro, 17 November.
Dwan, Renata and Bailey, Laura (2006). Liberia's Governance and Economic Management Assistance Programme (GEMAP), Washington, DC, World Bank, Fragile States Group.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth H.F. (1980). The State Tradition in Western Europe, Oxford.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David (1997). Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar, Oxford.Google Scholar
Elbe, Joachim (1939). ‘The Evolution of the Concept of Just War in International Law’, American Journal of International Law 33, pp. 665–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke (1985). ‘Reflections on War and Political Discourse. Realism, Just War, and Feminism in a Nuclear Age’, Political Theory 13, pp. 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke (2003). Just War against Terror. The Burden of American Power in a Violent World, New York.Google Scholar
Epron, Quentin (2006). La manière française du droit – contribution à l'histoire des méthodes juridiques de l'Humanisme aux pré-Lumières, Paris.Google Scholar
Esteban, Fernandez (1999). The Rule of Law in the European Constitution, The Hague.Google Scholar
,Failed State Index (2007). Foreign Policy and the Fund for Peace.
Falk, Richard (1999). Predatory Globalization. A Critique, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fastenrath, Ulrich (2000). ‘States, Extinction’ in Encyclopedia of Public International Law, ed. Bernhardt, R., vol. iv, North Holland, pp. 669–72.Google Scholar
Febbraio, Alberto and Teubner, Günther (1994). State, Law, and Economy as Autopoietic Systems, Milan.Google Scholar
Ferrajoli, Luigi (1997). La sovranità nel mondo moderno, 2nd edn, Rome and Bari.Google Scholar
Ferrari Bravo, Luciano (2001). ‘Homo Sacer’ in Dal fordismo alla globalizzazione, Rome, pp. 279–86.Google Scholar
Filmer, Sir Robert (1991). Patriarcha and Other Writings, ed. Sommerville, Johann, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha (2005). ‘Fights about Rules: the Role of Efficacy and Power in Changing Multilateralism’, Review of International Studies 31, pp. 186–207.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Günther (2004). ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law 25, pp. 1047–58.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Murray (1991). ‘State’ in The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Political Thought, ed. Miller, David, revised edn, Oxford, pp. 503–6.Google Scholar
Forsyth, Murray (1992). ‘The Tradition of International Law’ in Traditions of International Ethics, ed. Nardin, Terry and Mapel, David R., Cambridge, pp. 23–41.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1977). ‘Preface’ in Anti-Œdipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, New York, pp. xi–xiv.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1997). ‘Il faut défendre la société’. Cours au Collège de France 1975–1976, Paris.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2003). ‘Society Must Be Defended’. Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976, New York.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2005). Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collége de France, 1978–1979, Paris.Google Scholar
Fowler, Michael R. and Bunck, Julie Marie (1995). Law, Power, and the Sovereign State: The Evolution and Application of the Concept of Sovereignty, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Franklin, Julian H. (1973). Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Franklin, Julian H. (1991). ‘Sovereignty and the Mixed Constitution: Bodin and his Critics’ in The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J.H. and Goldie, Mark, Cambridge, pp. 298–328.Google Scholar
Freckmann, Anke and Wegerich, Thomas (1999). The German Legal System, London.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis (2004). State Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Fulbecke, William (1602). The pandectes of the law of nations, London.Google Scholar
Galli, Carlo (1996). Genealogia della politica: Carl Schmitt e la crisi del pensiero politico moderno, Bologna.Google Scholar
Gareis, Carl (1883). Allgemeines Staatsrecht, Freiburg and Tübingen.Google Scholar
Garnett, George (1994). ‘Editor's Introduction’ in Vindiciae, contra tyrannos, ed. and trans. Garnett, George, Cambridge, pp. xix–lxxvi.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel (1995). La révolution des pouvoirs. La souveraineté, le peuple et la représentation 1789–1799, Paris.Google Scholar
Gauthier, David P. (1969). The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gearty, Connor (2005). Can Human Rights Survive?, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gentili, Alberico (1933). De iure belli libri tres, Oxford.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond (1999). ‘Nietzsche and Genealogy’ in Morality, Culture and History: Essays on German Philosophy, Cambridge, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond (2001). Public Goods, Private Goods, Princeton.Google Scholar
Gihl, Torsten (1913). Sverige och västmakterna under Karl X Gustafs andra krig med Danmark, Uppsala.Google Scholar
Glaziou, Yves (1993). Hobbes en France au XVIIIe siècle, Paris.Google Scholar
Goldstone, J.A., Gurr, T.R., Harff, B., et al. (2000). State Failure Task Force Report: Phase III Findings, McLean, VA: Science Applications International Corporation.Google Scholar
Goodhardt, Arthur (1958). ‘Rule of Law and Absolute Sovereignty’, University of Pennsylvania Law Revue 106, pp. 943–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Dieter (2009). Souveränität. Herkunft und Zukunft eines Schlüsselbegriffs, Berlin.Google Scholar
Gross, Leo (1948). ‘The Peace of Westphalia, 1648–1948’, American Journal of International Law 42, pp. 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, Hugo (2005). The Rights of War and Peace, ed. Tuck, Richard, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Gruber, Lloyd (2000). Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guastini, Riccardo (2000). ‘La primauté du droit communautaire: une révision tacite de la Constitution italienne’, Les Cahiers du Conseil Constitutionnel, no. 9, pp. 173–84.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter (1983). Grotius et la Doctrine de Guerre Juste, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter (1990). ‘Grotius and Gentili: A Reassessment of Thomas E. Holland's Inaugural Lecture’ in Hugo Grotius and International Relations, ed. Bull, Hedley and Roberts, Adam, Oxford, pp. 133–76.Google Scholar
Hall, William E. (1924). A Treatise on International Law, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harding, Alan (2002). Medieval Law and the Foundations of the State, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardt, Michael (2000). ‘Sovereignty, Multitudes, Absolute Democracy: A Discussion between Michael Hardt and Thomas Dumm about Hardt and Negri's Empire’, Theory & Event 4.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio (1994). Labor of Dionysus: A Critique of the State-Form, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio (2000). Empire, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio (2004). Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire, New York.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio (2009). Commonwealth, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Harris, Grant T. (2006). ‘The Era of Multilateral Occupation’, Berkeley Journal of International Law 24, pp. 1–78.Google Scholar
Hart, H.L.A. (1983). Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Herbert L.A. (1994). The Concept of Law, 2nd edn. with a postscript edited by Bulloch, Penelope A. and Raz, Joseph, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hayward, John (1603). An Answer to the First Part of a Certaine Conference, Concerning Succession, London.Google Scholar
Hayward, John (1607). A Report of a Discourse Concerning Supreme Power in Affaires of Religion, London.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Friedrich Wilhelm (1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Right, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Held, David (1999). ‘The Transformation of Political Community: Rethinking Democracy in the Context of Globalization’ in Democracy's Edges, ed. Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano, Cambridge, pp. 84–111.Google Scholar
Held, David (2005). ‘Principles of Cosmopolitan Order’ in The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism, ed. Brock, Gillian and Brighouse, Harry, Cambridge, pp. 10–27.Google Scholar
Heller, Agnes (1991). ‘The Concept of the Political Revisited’ in Political Theory Today, ed. Held, David, Cambridge, pp. 330–43.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis (1968). How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy, New York.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis (1995). International Law: Politics and Values, Dordrecht, Boston and London.Google Scholar
Hertz, Noreena (2001). The Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy, London.Google Scholar
Hexter, J.H. (1973). The Vision of Politics on the Eve of the Reformation: More, Machiavelli, and Seyssel, New York.Google Scholar
Hinsley, Francis H. (1986). Sovereignty, 2nd edn, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ron (2004). Towards Juristocracy. The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1996). Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (2008). Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard, revised student edition with corrections, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, Leonard T. (1918). The Metaphysical Theory of the State: A Criticism, London.Google Scholar
Holliday, Ian (2003). ‘Ethics of Intervention: Just War Theory and the Challenge of the 21st Century’, International Relations 17, pp. 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höpfl, Harro (2004). Jesuit Political Thought: The Society of Jesus and the State, c.1540–1630, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, Alan Craig (1991). Algernon Sidney and the Republican Heritage in England and America, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, Erica (2008). ‘The European Year of Equal Opportunities for All: Is the EU Moving Away From a Formal Idea of Equality?’, European Law Journal 14, pp. 168–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David (1963). ‘Of the Original Contract’ in Essays, Moral Political and Literary, Oxford, pp. 452–73.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (2005a). ‘Pax Americana or the Empire of Insecurity’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 5, pp. 153–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew (2005b). ‘Legitimacy and the Use of Force: Can the Circle be Squared?’, Review of International Studies 31, pp. 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huysmans, Jef (2006). ‘International Politics of Exception: Competing Visions of International Political Order between Law and Politics’, Alternatives 31, pp. 135–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Fred L. (ed.) (1967). Major Peace Treaties of Modern History, 1648–1967, vol. i, New York.
Jackson, John H. (2003). ‘Sovereignty-Modern: A New Approach to an Outdated Concept’, American Journal of International Law 97, pp. 782–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert H. (2007). Sovereignty. Evolution of an Idea, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jahn, Beate (2005). ‘Kant, Mill and Illiberal Legacies in International Affairs’, International Organization 59, pp. 177–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Alan (1986). Sovereign Statehood. The Basis of International Society, London.Google Scholar
James, W.E. (2002). A Note on Pre-Shipment Inspection of Imports, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Jaume, Lucien (1983). ‘La théorie de la “personne fictive” dans le Léviathan de Hobbes’, Revue française de science politique 33, pp. 1009–35.CrossRef
Jaume, Lucien (1986). Hobbes et l'Etat représentatif moderne, Paris.Google Scholar
Jellinek, Georg (1880). Die rechtliche Natur der Staatenverträge, Vienna.Google Scholar
Jellinek, Georg (1922). Allgemeine Staatslehre, Berlin.
Jennings, Ivor (1952). The Law and the Constitution, London.Google Scholar
Johnson, James Turner (1975). Ideology, Reason, and the Limitation of War. Religious and Secular Concepts 1200–1740, Princeton.Google Scholar
Johnson, James Turner (1980). Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War. A Moral and Historical Inquiry, Princeton.Google Scholar
Johnson, James Turner (2006). ‘The Just War Idea: the State of the Question’, Social Philosophy & Policy 23, pp. 167–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Bill (1985). The State: Authority and Autonomy, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jouannet, Emmanuelle (1998). Emer de Vattel et l'émergence doctrinale du droit international classique, Paris.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert (2003). Paradise and Power. America and Europe in the New World Order, New York.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary (2002). ‘Cosmopolitanism and Organized Violence’ in Conceiving Cosmopolitanism. Theory, Context, and Practice, ed. Vertovec, Steven and Cohen, Robin, Oxford, pp. 268–78.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas (2008). Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Hannah Arendt, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, Frances M. (2004). ‘Failures of Just War Theory: Terror, Harm, and Justice’, Ethics 114, pp. 650–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1992). The Conflict of Faculties, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst (1951). ‘Pro Patria Mori in Medieval Political Thought’, American Historical Review 56, pp. 471–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst (1957/1997). The King's Two Bodies. A Study in Medieval Political Theory, Princeton.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kray, A. and Mastruzzi, M. (2005). ‘Bottom Quintile of Aggregate Governance Rankings’ in ‘Weak States and Global Threats?’, Governance Mattersiv.
Keefer, Scott Andrew (2006). ‘Building the Palace of Peace: the Hague Conference of 1899 and Arms Control in the Progressive Era’, Journal of the History of International Law 8, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, Scott Andrew (2007). ‘Building the Palace of Peace: the Hague Conference of 1907 and Arms Control before the World War’, Journal of the History of International Law 9, pp. 35–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, Maurice H. (1965). The Laws of War in the Late Middle Ages, London.Google Scholar
Kellison, Matthew (1621). The Right and Jurisdiction of the Prelate, and the Prince, n.p.
Kelsen, Hans (1911). Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre entwickelt aus der Lehre vom Rechtssatze, Tübingen.
Kelsen, Hans (1928a). Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts. Beitrag zu einer reinen Rechtslehre, 2nd edn, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans (1928b). Der soziologische und der juristische Staatsbegriff. Kritische Untersuchnung des Verhältnisses von Staat und Recht, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans (1929). ‘La naissance de l'Etat et la formation de sa nationalité. Les principes, leur application au cas de la Tchécoslovaquie’, Revue de droit international 2, pp. 613–41.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans (1942). ‘The Law as a Specific Social Technique’, University of Chicago Law Review 9, pp. 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans (1960). ‘Sovereignty and International Law’, Georgetown Law Journal 48, pp. 627–40.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David (1986). ‘Primitive Legal Scholarship’, Harvard International Law Journal 27, pp. 1–98.Google Scholar
King James, VI and I (1994). Political Writings, ed. Johann Sommerville, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Klabbers, Jan (1999). ‘Clinching the Concept of Sovereignty: Wimbledon Redux’, Austrian Review of International and European Law 3, pp. 345–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, Jan (2009). ‘Law-making and Constitutionalism’ in The Constitutionalisation of International Law, ed. Klabbers, Jan, Anne Peters and Geir Ulfstein, pp. 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesmann, Bernd (2007). Bellum solemne. Formen und Funktionen europäischer Kriegserklärungen des 17. Jahrhunderts, Mainz.Google Scholar
Kochenov, Dimitri (2009). ‘The EU Rule of Law: Cutting Paths through Confusion’, Erasmus Law Review 6, pp. 5–24.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold H. (1997). ‘Why Do Nations Obey International Law?’, The Yale Law Journal 106, pp. 2599–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (1994). ‘The Wonderful Artificiality of States’, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law 22, pp. 22–9Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (1995). ‘The Police in the Temple. Order, Justice and the UN; A Dialectical View’, European Journal of International Law 5, pp. 325–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (2000). ‘Present State of Research’ in La succession d'États: La codification à l'épreuve des faits / State Succession: Codification Tested against the Facts, ed. Eisemann, Pierre Michel and Koskenniemi, Martti, The Hague, pp. 89–168.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (2003a). ‘Book review. Giovanna Borradori (ed.), Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida’, German Law Journal 10, pp. 1087–94.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (2003b). ‘Legitimacy, Rights and Ideology: Notes towards a Critique of the New Moral Internationalism’, Associations. Journal for Legal and Social Theory 7, pp. 349–74.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (2004). ‘International Law as Political Theology: How to Read Nomos der Erde?’, Constellations 11, pp. 492–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (2005). From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (2007). ‘The Fate of International Law. Between Technique and Politics’, The Modern Law Review 70, pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (2009). ‘Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law’, European Journal of International Relations 15, pp. 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti and Lehto, Marja (1992). ‘La succession d’États dans l'ex-URSS en ce qui concerne particulièrement les relations avec la Finlande', Annuaire français de droit international 38, pp. 179–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1993). ‘Economic Interdependence and Independent Statehood’ in States in a Changing World: A Contemporary Analysis, ed. Jackson, Robert H. and James, Alan, New York, pp. 301–21.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. (1999). Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Leonard (1977). ‘The Idea of Authority in the West’, American Historical Review 82, pp. 249–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, Nico (2007). ‘The Open Architecture of European Human Rights Law’, LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 11/2007, 34 pp.; also in Modern Law Review 71, pp. 183–216.
Krupp, Tyler (2008). ‘Genealogy as Critique?’, Journal of the Philosophy of History 2, pp. 315–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunisch, Johannes (1991). ‘Der Nordische Krieg von 1655–1660 als Parabel frühneuzeitlicher Staatenkonflikte’ in Rahmenbedingungen und Handlungsspielräume europäischer Auβenpolitik im Zeitalter Ludwigs XIV, ed. Duchhardt, H., Berlin, pp. 9–42.Google Scholar
Ladeur, Karl-Heinz (1997). ‘Post-Modern Constitutional Theory: A Prospective for the Self-Organising Society’, Modern Law Review 60, pp. 617–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lansing, Robert (1921). Notes on Sovereignty, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold J. (1917). Studies in the Problem of Sovereignty, New Haven.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold J. (1919). Authority in the Modern State, London.Google Scholar
Laski, Harold J. (1931). The Foundations of Sovereignty, and Other Essays, London.Google Scholar
Latham, Robert (2000). ‘Social Sovereignty’, Theory, Culture & Society 17, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch (1948). Recognition in International Law, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bret, Cardin (1689). Les oeuvres de messire C. Le Bret …Contenant son traité de la souveraineté du roy (…), Paris.Google Scholar
Leander, Anna (2005). ‘The Market for Force and Public Security: the Destabilizing Consequences of Private Military Companies’, Journal of Peace Research 42, pp. 605–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefort, Claude (1988). ‘The Permanence of the Theologico-Political?’ in Democracy and Political Theory, Minneapolis, pp. 213–55.Google Scholar
Leibholz, Gerhard (1965). ‘Sovereignty and European Integration’ in Politics and Law, Leiden, pp. 214–34.Google Scholar
Leira, Halvard (2007). ‘At the Crossroads: Justus Lipsius and the Early Modern Development of International Law’, Leiden Journal of International Law 20, pp. 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesaffer, R. (2001). ‘War, Peace, Interstate Friendship and the Emergence of the ius publicum Europaeum’ in Frieden und Krieg in der Frühen Neuzeit: die europäische Staatenordnung und die aussereuropäische Welt, ed. Voss, W.E., Asch, Ronald G. and Wrede, Martin, Munich, pp. 87–113.Google Scholar
Levack, Brian P. (1973). The Civil Lawyers in England 1603–1641: A Political Study, Oxford.Google Scholar
Levack, Brian P. (1988). ‘Law and Ideology: the Civil Law and Theories of Absolutism in Elizabethan and Jacobean England’ in The Historical Renaissance: New Essays on Tudor and Stuart Literature and Culture, ed. Dubrow, Heather and Strier, Richard, Chicago, pp. 220–41.Google Scholar
Lewis, George C. (1898). Remarks on the Use and Abuse of Some Political Terms, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lieberman, David (1989). The Province of Legislation Determined: Legal Theory in Eighteenth-Century Britain, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, Hans (2003). ‘Sovereignty and Representation in the EU’ in Sovereignty in Transition, ed. Walker, Neil, Oxford, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
Livy, (1600). The Romane Historie Written by T. Livius of Padua, trans. Holland, Philemon, London.Google Scholar
Lobban, Michael (2007). A History of the Philosophy of Law in the Common Law World, 1600–1900, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Locke, John (1988). Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, Martin (2003). The Idea of Public Law, Oxford.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin (2005). ‘The Functionalist Style in Public Law’, University of Toronto Law Journal 55, pp. 361–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loyseau, Charles (1608). Traité des Seigneuries, Paris.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1969). Legitimation durch Verfahren, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (2004). Law as a Social System, ed. Kastner, F., Nobles, R., Schiff, D. and Ziegert, R, trans. Ziegert, K., Oxford.Google Scholar
Määta, Paula (2008). Equal Pay: Just a Principle of the ILO?, Tampere.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil (1984). ‘Der Rechtsstaat und die Rule of Law’, Juristen-Zeitung 2, pp. 65–70.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil (1993). ‘Beyond the Sovereign State’, Modern Law Review 56, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, Neil (1999). Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Practical Reason, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, Neil (2004). ‘Questioning Post-Sovereignty’, European Law Review 29, pp. 852–63.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil (2007). Institutions of Law, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò (1640). Nicholas Machiavel's Prince, trans. Dacres, Edward, London.Google Scholar
MacNeill, Jim (1991). Beyond Interdependence: The Meshing of the World's Economy and the Earth's Ecology, Oxford.Google Scholar
Maitland, F. W. (2003). State, Trust and Corporation, ed. Runciman, David and Ryan, Magnus, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, Noel (2007). Reason of State, Propaganda, and the Thirty Years' War: An Unknown Translation by Thomas Hobbes, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. (1996). Machiavelli's Virtue, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P. (1989). Rediscovering Institution: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York.Google Scholar
Marchart, Oliver (2007). Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau, Edinburgh.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marek, Kristina (1954). Identity and Continuity of States in Public International Law, Geneva.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1969). ‘The Concept of Sovereignty’ in In Defence of Sovereignty, ed. Stankiewicz, Wladyslaw J., New York, pp. 41–64.Google Scholar
Matanock, Aila M. (2008). Learning to Share: Under What Conditions States Delegate Governance, unpublished paper, Stanford University, Political Science Department.Google Scholar
Mattei, Rodolfo (1979). Il problema della ‘ragion di stato’ nell' età della controriforma, Milan.Google Scholar
Mayntz, Renate (1999). ‘La teoria della governance: sfide e prospettive’, Rivista italiana di scienza politica, 1, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
McLean, Janet (2003). ‘Government to State: Globalization, Regulation, and Governments as Legal Persons’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10, pp. 173–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, Janet (2005). ‘Divergent Legal Conceptions of the State: Implications for Global Administrative Law’, Law and Contemporary Problems 68, pp. 167–87.Google Scholar
Mény, Yves (2002). ‘Constituer l'Europe’, Le Monde, 28 February.Google Scholar
Meyer, J.W., Boli, J., Thomas, G.M. and Ramirez, F.O. (1997). ‘World Society and the Nation-State’, American Journal of Sociology 103, pp. 144–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, Kenneth William Bruce (1952). ‘Sovereignty in Theory and Practice’ in In Defence of Sovereignty, ed. Stankiewicz, Wladyslaw J., New York, pp. 132–59.Google Scholar
Minkkinen, Panu (2009). Sovereignty, Knowledge, Law, London.Google Scholar
Molina, Luis (1615). De iustitia et iure, Antwerp.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles (1951). Œuvres Complètes, text presented and annotated by Caillois, R., Paris.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles (1989). The Spirit of the Laws, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (2002). ‘In Defense of the Democratic Deficit: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40, pp. 603–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1929). Die internationale Rechtspflege, ihr Wesen und ihre Grenzen, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1948). ‘The Problem of Sovereignty Reconsidered’, 48 Colum. L. Rev., pp. 341–65.
Morgenthau, Hans J. (1966). Politics among Nations, 4th edn, New York.Google Scholar
Morris, Christopher W. (1998). An Essay on the Modern State, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Christopher W. (2004). ‘The Modern State’ in Handbook of Political Theory, ed. Gaus, Gerald F. and Kukathas, Chandran, London, pp. 195–209.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal (2005). On the Political, London and New York.Google Scholar
Müllerson, Rein (1998). ‘Law and Politics in Succession of States: International Law on Succession of States’ in Dissolution, Continuation and Succession in Eastern Europe, ed. Stern, Brigitte, The Hague, pp. 5–32.Google Scholar
Myers, Robert J. (1996). ‘Notes on the Just War Theory: Whose Justice, Which Wars?’, Ethics & International Affairs 10, pp. 116–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naim, Moises (2005). ‘Broken Borders’, Newsweek, 24 October.Google Scholar
Naim, Moises (2005). Illicit: How Smugglers, Traffickers, and Copycats are Hijacking the Global Economy, New York.Google Scholar
Näsström, Sofia (2003). ‘What Globalization Overshadows’, Political Theory 31, pp. 808–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,National Intelligence Council (2008). Global Trends 2025: a Transformed World, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Neff, Stephen C. (2005). War and the Law of Nations. A General History, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Negri, Antonio (1977). La forma-Stato, Milan.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio (1991a). Marx Beyond Marx. Lessons on the Grundrisse, New York and London.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio (1991b). The Savage Autonomy: The Power of Spinoza's Metaphysics and Politics, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio (1999). Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio (2005). Books for Burning, London.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio (2006). Political Descartes, London.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio (2008). ‘The Political Monster: Power and Naked Life’ in In Praise of the Common, ed. Casarino, Cesare and Negri, Antonio, Minneapolis, pp. 193–218.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Peter P. (1990). The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists: Selected Studies, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Arthur (1943). ‘Just War – A Legal Concept?’, Michigan Law Review 42, pp. 453–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donovan, Oliver (2003). The Just War Revisited, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offe, Claus (1985). ‘New Social Movements: Changing Boundaries of the Political’, Social Research 52, pp. 817–68.Google Scholar
Orford, Anne (2009). ‘Jurisdiction without Territory. From the Holy Roman Empire to the Responsibility to Protect’, Michigan Journal of International Law 30, pp. 981–1015.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas (2001a). ‘Sovereignty, International Relations and the Westphalian Myth’, International Organization 55, pp. 251–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiander, Andreas (2001b). ‘Before Sovereignty: Sovereignty and Politics in ancien régime Europe’, Review of International Studies 25, pp. 119–45.Google Scholar
Ost, François and Kerchove, Michel (2002). De la pyramide au réseau? Pour une théorie dialectique du droit, Brussels.Google Scholar
Othmer, Sieglinde (1970). Berlin und die Verbreitung des Naturrechts in Europa, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta (1990). Samuel Pufendorf, discepolo di Hobbes, Bologna.Google Scholar
Palonen, Kari (1998). Das ‘Webersche Moment’. Zur Kontingenz des Politischen, Opladen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Henry (1642). Observations upon some of his Majesties late Answers and Expresses, London.Google Scholar
Parkin, Jon (2007). Taming the Leviathan: The Reception of the Political and Religious Ideas of Thomas Hobbes in England 1640–1700, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasini, Dino (1965). Riflessioni in tema di sovranità, Milano.Google Scholar
Patterson, Eric (2005). 'Just War in the 21st Century: Reconceptualizing Just War Theory after September 11', International Politics 42, pp. 116–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauly, Louis W. and Grande, Edgar (2005). ‘Reconstituting Political Authority: Sovereignty, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy in a Transnational Order’ in Complex Sovereignty: Reconstituting Political Authority in the Twenty-first Century, ed. Pauly, Louis W. and Grande, Edgar, Toronto, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Pennington, Kenneth (1976). ‘The Canonists and Pluralism in the Thirteenth Century’, Speculum 51, pp. 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, Charles (1986). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, 3rd edn, New York.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne (2007). ‘The Globalization of State Constitutions’ in New Perspectives on the Divide Between National and International Law, ed. Nijman, J. and Nollkaemper, A., Oxford, p. 251–308.Google Scholar
Peterson, Erik (1935). Der Monotheismus als politisches Problem: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der politischen Theologie im Imperium Romanum, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Philpott, Daniel (1997). ‘Ideas and the Evolution of Sovereignty’ in State Sovereignty: Change and Persistence in International Relations, ed. Hashmi, Sohail H., Pennsylvania, pp. 15–47.Google Scholar
Piirimäe, Pärtel (2010). ‘War and Polemics in Early Modern Europe’ in Exploring Cultural History. Essays in Honour of Peter Burke, ed. Vivo, Filippo, Calaresu, Melissa and Rubiés, Joan-Pau, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel (1967). The Concept of Representation, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Plato, (1894). Plato's Republic – the Greek Text, ed. Jowett, Benjamin, Oxford.Google Scholar
Plessner, Helmuth (1931). Macht und menschliche Natur, Berlin.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco (1978). The Development of the Modern State: A Sociological Introduction, London.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard (2007). Countering Terrorism, Stanford.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos (ed.) (1976). La Crise de l'État, Paris.
Praet, Patrick (2007). ‘Politisierung des Rechts oder Verrechtlichung der Politik – Diskurs der Grundrechte’, Rechtstheorie 38, pp. 367–78.Google Scholar
Prokhovnik, Raia (2007). Sovereignties. Contemporary Theory and Practice, New York.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1706). Le droit de la nature et des gens, trans. Barbeyrac, Jean, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1717). Of the Law of Nature and Nations, trans. Kennett, Basil, 3rd edn, London.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1934). De jure naturae et gentium, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1995). ‘Gundaeus Baubator Danicus [1659]’ in Samuel von Pufendorf: Kleine Vorträge und Schriften. Texte zu Geschichte, Pädagogik, Philosophie, Kirche und Völkerrecht, ed. Döring, D., Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (2009). Two Books of the Elements of Universal Jurisprudence, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Rabb, Theodore K. (1998). Jacobean Gentleman: Sir Edwin Sandys, 1561–1629, Princeton.Google Scholar
Radin, Margeret Jane (1989). ‘Reconsidering the Rule of Law’, Boston University Law Review 69, pp. 781–819.Google Scholar
,RAMSI (n.d.). www.ramsi.org/node/5.
Rauschenberger, Walther (1921). ‘Die staatsrechtliche Bedeutung von Staatsstreich und Revolution’, Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 2, pp. 113–30.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1979). The Authority of Law. Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, Richard J. (1996). Just War. Principles and Cases, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rengger, Nicholas (2002). ‘On the Just War Tradition in the Twenty-First Century’, International Affairs 78, pp. 353–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rengger, Nicholas (2005). ‘The Judgment of War: on the Idea of Legitimate Force in World Politics’, Review of International Studies 31, pp. 143–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission (2007). Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, finalized by Martti Koskenniemi, Helsinki, 2007.Google Scholar
Revel, Judith (2007). Dictionnaire Foucault, Paris.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre (2000). La démocratie inachevée: histoire de la souveraineté du peuple en France, Paris.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. (2003). Distant Proximities: Dynamics Beyond Globalization, Princeton.Google Scholar
Rosenkrantz, Gundaeus (1659). Dissertatio juridico-politica de Legato Suecies durante obsidioni Hafniensi a Rege Daniae jure detento.
Ross, Alf (1947). A Textbook of International Law, London.Google Scholar
Ross, Alf (1960). ‘On the Concepts of “State” and “State Organs” in Constitutional Law’ in Scandinavian Studies in Law, vol. v, pp. 111–29.
Ross, Alf (1961). ‘Validity and the Conflict between Legal Positivism and Natural Law’ in Revista Juridica de Buenos-Aires, IV, repr. in Legal Positivism, ed. Jori, Mario (1992), Dartmouth, pp. 46–88.Google Scholar
Ross, Alf (1965). ‘Scandinavian Law’ in Sovereignty within the Law, ed. Larson, Arthuret al., London, pp. 107–22.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1964). Oeuvres Complètes – Du Contrat Social; écrits politiques, Paris.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1997). The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Runciman, David (1997). Pluralism and the Personality of the State, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runciman, David (2000). ‘What Kind of Person is Hobbes's State? A Reply to Skinner’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 8, pp. 268–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runciman, David (2003). ‘The Concept of the State: the Sovereignty of a Fiction’ in States and Citizens, ed. Skinner, Quentin and Strath, Bo, Cambridge, pp. 28–38.Google Scholar
Runciman, David (2008). Political Hypocrisy: The Mask of Power, from Hobbes to Orwell and Beyond, Princeton.Google Scholar
Rupp, Teresa (2000). ‘Damnation, Individual and Community in Remigio dei Girolami's De Bono Communi’, History of Political Thought 21, pp. 217–36.Google Scholar
Russell, Frederick H. (1975). The Just War in the Middle Ages, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles F. and Zeitlin, Jonathan (2007). ‘Learning Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union’, European Governance Papers, no. 2.
Sadurski, Wojciech (2008). ‘“Solange – chapter 3”: Constitutional Courts in Central Europe’, European Law Review 14, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott (1993). The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons, Princeton.Google Scholar
Sandys, Edwin (1605). A relation of the state of religion and with what hopes and pollicies it hath beene framed, and is maintained in the severall states of these westerne parts of the world, London.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia (1996). Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization, New York.Google Scholar
Schilling, Theodor (1996). ‘The Autonomy of the Community Legal Order: An Analysis of Possible Foundations’, Harvard International Law Journal 37, pp. 389–410.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Georg (1999). Geschichte des alten Reiches: Staat und Nation in der Frühen Neuzeit, 1495–1806, Munich.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1922). Politische Theologie. Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität, Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1932). Legalität und Legitimität, Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1950). Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum, Cologne.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1996a). Roman Catholicism and Political Form, trans. Ulmen, Gary L., Westport, CT.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (1996b). The Concept of the Political, trans. Schwab, George, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (2005). Political Theology. Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, ed. and trans. Schwab, G., intro. by Strong, T., Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl (2008). Political Theology II: The Myth of the Closure of Any Political Theology, trans. Hoelzl, Michael and Ward, Graham, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schofield, Philip (2006). Utility and Democracy: The Political Thought of Jeremy Bentham, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, Peter (1999). ‘The Constitution of the Holy Roman Empire After 1684: Samuel Pufendorf's Assessment in His Monzambano’, The Historical Journal 42, pp. 961–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schupp, Johann Balthazar (1657). ‘Ambrosii Mellilambii Send-Schreiben, An einen Vornehmen Cavallier. Betreffend Die Schwedische und Polnische Waffen’.
Schürmann, Reiner (1996). Des hégémonies brisées, Toulouse.Google Scholar
Schütze, Robert (2005). Sharpening the Separation of Powers through a Hierarchy of Norms? Reflections on the Draft Constitutional Treaty's Regime for Legislative and Executive Law-making, Maastricht.Google Scholar
Schwarzenberger, Georg (1957). ‘The Forms of Sovereignty’, Current Legal Problems 10, pp. 264–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciulli, David (2001). Corporate Power in Civil Society: An Application of Societal Constitutionalism, New York.Google Scholar
Senellart, Michel (1995). Les arts de gouverner. Du regimen médiéval au concept du gouvernment, Paris.Google Scholar
Shapcott, Richard (2001). Justice, Community and Dialogue in International Relations, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Jo (2003). ‘Sovereignty at the Boundaries of the Polity’ in Sovereignty in Transition, ed. Walker, Neil, Oxford, pp. 461–500.Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N. (1997). International Law, 4th edn, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry (1897). The Elements of Politics, 2nd edn, London.Google Scholar
Leone, Sierra (n.d.), Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone at www.sierra-leone.org/specialcourtstatute.html.
Skinner, Quentin (1978). The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, 2 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1999). ‘Hobbes and the Purely Artificial Person of the State’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 7, pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2002). Visions of Politics, 3 vols., Cambridge.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2007). ‘Hobbes on Persons, Authors and Representatives’ in The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes's Leviathan, ed. Springborg, Patricia, Cambridge, pp. 157–80.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2009). ‘A Genealogy of the Modern State’, Proceedings of the British Academy 162, pp. 325–70.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2004). ‘Disaggregated Sovereignty: Toward the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks’, Government and Opposition 39, pp. 159–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2005). A New World Order, Princeton.Google Scholar
Slomp, Gabriella (2006). ‘Carl Schmitt's Five Arguments against the Idea of Just War’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19, pp. 435–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, David (1994). Constitutional Royalism and the Search for Settlement c. 1640–1649, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobota, Katharina (1997). Das Prinzip Rechtsstaat, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Johann (1991a). ‘Introduction’ to Sir Robert Filmer, Patriarcha and Other Writings, Cambridge, pp. ix–xlvi.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Johann (1991b). ‘Absolutism and Royalism’ in The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, ed. Burns, J.H. and Goldie, Mark, Cambridge, pp. 347–73.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Johann (1999). Royalists and Patriots: Politics and Ideology in England 1603–1640, 2nd edn, London.Google Scholar
Sowell, Thomas (2004). Affirmative Action around the World: A Comparative Study, New Haven.Google Scholar
Späth, Konrad (2005). ‘Inside Global Governance: New Borders of a Concept’ in Criticizing Global Governance, ed. Lederer, Markus and Müller, Philipp S., New York, pp. 21–45.Google Scholar
Spitz, Jean-Fabien (1998). Bodin et la souveraineté, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik (1994). The Sovereign State and Its Competitors, Princeton.Google Scholar
Stern, Klaus (1984). Staatsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Band I, 2nd edn, Cologne.Google Scholar
Stewart, P. and Rice, S. (n.d.). ‘Today's Weak and Failing States’, Center for Global Development and Brookings Institution.
Strange, Susan (1996). The Retreat of the State: the Diffusion of Power in the World Economy, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suárez, Francisco. (1944). Selections from three works: De Legibus, ac deo legislatore, Defensio fidei catholicae.…, De Triplici virtute…, Oxford.Google Scholar
Suárez, F. (1975). De Civili Potestate (III. 1–16) in De Legibus, ed. Pereña, Luciano, Madrid.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass (1996). Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tesón, Fernando R. (1997). Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality, 2nd edn, New York.Google Scholar
Teubner, Günther (1997a). ‘The King's Many Bodies: the Self-Deconstruction of Law's Hierarchy’, The Law & Society Review 31, pp. 763–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Günther (1997b). Global Law without a State, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Teubner, Günther (2003). ‘Der Umgang mit Rechtsparadoxien: Derrida, Luhmann, Wiethölter’ in Rechtsverfassungsecht. Recht-Fertigung zwischen Privatrechtsdogmatik und Gesellschaftstheorie, ed. Joerges, Christian and Teubner, Günther, Baden Baden, pp. 22–45.Google Scholar
Teubner, Günther (2004). ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternative to State-Centered Theory’ in Transnational Governance & Constitutionalism, ed. Joerges, Christian, Sand, Inger-Johanne and Teubner, Günther, Oxford, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Teubner, Günther (2005). La cultura del diritto nell'epoca della globalizzazione. L'emergere delle costituzioni civili, Rome.Google Scholar
Teubner, Günther (2006). ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’, Modern Law Review 69, pp. 327–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoma, Richard (1910). ‘Rechtsstaatsidee und Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft’, Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts 4, pp. 196–218.Google Scholar
Thompson, Helen (2006). ‘The Case for External Sovereignty’, European Journal of International Relations 12, pp. 251–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurloe, John (1742). A Collection of State Papers, London.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1992). ‘The Limits of Allegiance in a Nuclear Age’ in Just War Theory, ed. Elshtain, Jean Bethke, New York, pp. 280–98.Google Scholar
Toyoda, Tetsuya (2009). ‘La doctrine vattelienne de l’égalité souveraine dans le contexte neuchâtelois', Journal of the History of International Law 11, pp. 103–24.Google Scholar
Troper, Michel (2001). La théorie du droit, le droit, l'Etat, Paris.Google Scholar
Troper, Michel (2003). ‘The Logic of the Justification of Judicial Review of Legislation’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 1, pp. 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troper, Michel (2008). ‘Identité constitutionnelle’ in 1958–2008. Cinquantième anniversaire de la Constitution française, ed. Mathieu, Bertrand, Paris, pp. 123–31.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1987). ‘The “Modern” Theory of Natural Law’, in The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, ed. Pagden, Anthony, Cambridge, pp. 99–121.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1993). Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1999). The Rights of War and Peace. Political Thought and the International Order From Grotius to Kant, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tukiainen, Arto (1994). ‘The Commonwealth as a Person in Hobbes's Leviathan’, Hobbes Studies 7, pp. 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James (1995). Strange Multiplicity. Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, Kaarlo (1992). ‘Four Models of the Rechtsstaat’ in Öffentliche oder private Moral? Festschrift für Ernesto Garzón Valdés, ed. Krawietz, Werner and Wright, Georg Henrik, Berlin, pp. 451–64.Google Scholar
Turegano Mansilla, Isabel (2007). ‘A vueltas con la noción de soberanía: Reflexiones sobre la contribución de Ernesto Garzón Valdés’, Doxa 30, pp. 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, Walter (1949). ‘The Development of the Medieval Idea of Sovereignty’, English Historical Review 64, pp. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,United States (2006). National Security Strategy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Vahlas, Alexis (2005). ‘Souveraineté et droit de retrait au sein de l´Union européenne’, Revue du droit public 6, pp. 1565–600.Google Scholar
Caenegem, Raoul C. (1991). Legal History: A European Perspective, London.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emerich (1760). The Law of Nations; or Principles of the Law of Nature: Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, London.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine (2008). ‘The Force of a Weak Field: Law and Lawyers in the Government of the European Union (For a Renewed Research Agenda)’, International Political Sociology 2, pp. 128–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vedel, Georges (1992). ‘Schengen et Maastricht (à propos de la décision n’°91–294 DC du Conseil constitutionnel du 25 juillet 1991)', Revue Française de Droit Administratif 8, pp. 173–84.Google Scholar
Verges, Jean (2002). ‘Réflexions sur le constitutionnalisme de l'Union européenne’ in L'identité de l'Europe, ed. Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf and Pena, Marc, Aix en Provence.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, Joe (2008). Considérations sur ce qui est commun. Cours général de droit international public (2002), Recueil des cours, vol. cccxxxiv, Académie de droit international, Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verzijl, J.H.W. (1969). International Law in Historical Perspective, Part II: International Persons, Leiden.Google Scholar
Villa, Dana (2007). ‘The “Autonomy of the Political” Reconsidered’, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 28, pp. 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, Andrew (1987). Theories of the State, Oxford.Google Scholar
Vindiciae, contra tyrannos (1994). Ed. and trans. George Garnett, Cambridge.
Viroli, Maurizio (1992). From Politics to Reason of State. The Acquisition and Transformation of the Language of Politics 1250–1600, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco (1917). De Jure Belli (De Indis), ed. Scott, James Brown, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco (1991). ‘On the Law of War’ in Political Writings, ed. Pagden, J.L. Anthony, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mohl, Robert (1844). Die Polizei-Wissenschaft nach den Grundsätzen des Rechtsstaates, 2nd edn, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Wade, H.W.R. (1955). ‘The Basis of Legal Sovereignty’, Cambridge Law Journal 14, pp. 172–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, H.W.R. (1996). ‘Sovereignty – Revolution or Evolution’, Law Quarterly Review 112, pp. 568–75.Google Scholar
Wæver, Ole (1995). ‘Identity, Integration and Security. Solving the Sovereignty Puzzle in E.U. Studies’, Journal of International Affairs 48, pp. 389–431.Google Scholar
Walker, Neil (ed.) (2003a). Sovereignty in Transition, Oxford and Portland.
Walker, R.B.J. (2003b). ‘Late Sovereignty in the European Union’ in Sovereignty in Transition, ed. Walker, Neil, Oxford, pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Walker, R.B.J. (1990). ‘Sovereignty, Identity, Community: Reflections on the Horizons of Contemporary Political Practice’ in Contending Sovereignties, ed. Walker, R.B.J. and Mendlovitz, S.H., Boulder and London, pp. 159–85.Google Scholar
Walker, R.B.J. (1995). ‘From International Relations to World Politics’ in The State in Transition: Reimagining Political Space, ed. Camilleri, Joseph A., Jarvis, Anthony P. and Pasolini, Albert J., Boulder, pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael (1977). Just and Unjust Wars. A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, New York.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael (2004). Arguing about War, New Haven.Google Scholar
Ward, Ian (2003). ‘The End of Sovereignty and the New Humanism’, Stanford Law Review 55, pp. 2091–112.Google Scholar
Ward, Paul W. (1928). Sovereignty: A Study of a Contemporary Political Notion, London.Google Scholar
Weatherill, Stephen (1995). Law and Integration in the European Union, Oxford.Google Scholar
Weber, Cynthia (1995). Simulating Sovereignty, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Weber, Cynthia and Biersteker, Thomas J. (ed.) (1996). State Sovereignty as Social Construct, Cambridge.
Weber, Max (1984). ‘Legitimacy, Politics and the State’ in Legitimacy and the State, ed. Connolly, William, Oxford, pp. 32–62.Google Scholar
Weigel, Georg (2003). ‘The Just War Tradition and the World after September 11’ in Logos 5, pp. 13–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H.H. (1999). The Constitution of Europe, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H.H. (2002). ‘A Constitution for Europe’, Journal of Common Market Studies 40, pp. 563–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, J.M., Porter, J.E. and Eizenstat, S.E. (2004). ‘On the Brink: Weak States and US National Security’, Commission on Weak States and US National Security.
Weiss, Thomas (2007). Humanitarian Intervention: Ideas in Action, London.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander (1999). ‘A Comment on Held's Cosmopolitanism’, in Democracy's Edges, ed. Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano, Cambridge, pp. 127–33.Google Scholar
Werner, W.G. and Wilde, J.H. (2001). ‘The Endurance of Sovereignty’, European Journal of International Relations 7, pp. 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J. (2000). Saving Strangers; Humanitarian Intervention in International Society, Oxford.Google Scholar
Willoughby, William (1896). An Examination of the Nature of the State, New York and London.Google Scholar
Wind, Marlene (2001). Sovereignty and European Integration: Towards a Post-Hobbesian Order, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, Bruno (2006). ‘Sovereignty and European Integration: The Weight of a Legal Tradition’ in Relocating Sovereignty, ed. Walker, Neil, Aldershot, pp. 491–520.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon (1996). ‘Fugitive Democracy’ in Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla, Princeton, pp. 31–45.Google Scholar
Ziller, Jacques (2003). ‘Sovereignty in France: Getting Rid of the Mal de Bodin’ in Sovereignty in Transition, ed. Walker, Neil, Oxford, pp. 261–78.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj (2006a). The Parallax View, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj (2006b). ‘A Plea for a Return to Différance’, Critical Inquiry 32, pp. 226–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zumbansen, Peer (2009). ‘Post-regulatorisches recht: Chronik einer angekündigten Karriere’ in Soziologische Jurisprudenz. Festschrift für Gunther Teubner, ed. Calliess, G.-P., Fischer-Lescano, A., Wielsch, D. and Zumbansen, P., Berlin, pp. 627–43.Google Scholar