Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-cxxrm Total loading time: 0.213 Render date: 2021-11-30T13:27:26.413Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

3 - Inter-Korean relations: confrontation, economic exchanges, and the nuclear crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Uk Heo
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Terence Roehrig
United States Naval War College, Newport, Rhode Island
Get access


Since the division of the country, the relationship between the two Koreas has fluctuated. In general, the inter-Korean relationship can be divided into four different periods based on the characteristics of the relationship: (1) antagonistic period: from the Syngman Rhee administration to the Chun Doo-hwan government, 1948–1987; (2) period of coexistence: the Roh Tae-woo and the Kim Young-sam administrations, 1988–1997; (3) engagement policy period: the Kim Dae-jung and Roh Moo-hyun administrations, 1998–2007; and (4) conditional engagement policy period: the Lee Myung-bak and the Park Geun-hye administrations, 2008 to present.

Four factors have affected South Korea’s policy toward North Korea: economic development, democratization in South Korea, the end of the Cold War, and North Korea’s nuclear weapons program. Among them, South Korea’s economic development played a key role in changing its approach toward North Korea because economic development led to democratization, which gave way to political elite changes and subsequent policy changes. Furthermore, democratically elected leaders implemented their North Korean policy with confidence thanks to political legitimacy and economic superiority. In this chapter, we study the effects of economic development on South Korea’s policy toward North Korea.

South Korea's Rise
Economic Development, Power, and Foreign Relations
, pp. 28 - 49
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Eberstadt, Nicholas, The End of North Korea (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press, 1999), 26Google Scholar
Kyu-seop, Jung, “Unification Diplomacy,” in Dal-choong, Kim (ed.), Korea’s Foreign Policy (Seoul: Orum Publishers, 1998), 235–60 (in Korean)Google Scholar
United States Department of State, American Foreign Policy: Current Documents, 1967 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1967)Google Scholar
Hughes, Christopher W., “North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons: Implications for the Nuclear Ambitions of Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan,” Asia Policy 3 (January 2007): 75–104 (93–94)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joong-sun, Roh, Two Koreas’ Unification Policy and Fifty Years of the Unification Movement (Seoul: Sa-Gyejeol, 1996) (in Korean)Google Scholar
Im, Hyug-baeg and Choi, Yu-Jeoung, “Inter-Korean and Cross-Strait Relations through the Window of Regional Integration Theories,” Asian Survey 51:5 (September/October 2011): 785–811Google Scholar
Levin, Norman and Han, Yong-Sup, Sunshine in Korea: The South Korean Debate over Policies toward North Korea (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Center for Asia Pacific Policy, 2002)Google Scholar
Heo, Uk, “The Political Economy of Defense Spending in South Korea,” Journal of Peace Research 34 (November 1996): 483–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koo, Youngnok, “Future Perspective on South Korea’s Foreign Relations,” Asian Survey 20:11 (November 1980): 1155–56Google Scholar
Heo, Uk and Hyun, Chong-min, “The Sunshine Policy Revisited: An Analysis of South Korea’s Policy toward North Korea,” in Heo, Uk and Horowitz, Shale (eds.), Conflict in Asia: Korea-China-Taiwan, and India-Pakistan (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003), 92–93Google Scholar
Yu-hwan, Koh, “Unification Policies of Two Koreas and Outlook for Unity,” Korea Focus 8:6 (2000): 90–113Google Scholar
Cha, Victor, “Korean Unification: The Zero-Sum Past and the Precarious Future,” Asian Perspective 21:3 (Winter 1997): 63–92Google Scholar
Republic of Korea Ministry of Unification, Peace and Cooperation: White Paper on Korean Unification (Seoul: Ministry of Unification, 2001), 21–22Google Scholar
Roehrig, Terence, “North Korea and the US State Sponsors of Terrorism List,” Pacific Focus 24:1 (April 2009): 85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chien-peng, Chung, “Democratization in South Korea and Inter-Korean Relations,” Pacific Affairs 76:1 (Spring 2003): 9–35Google Scholar
Yoon, Sanghyun, “South Korea’s Kim Young Sam Government: Political Agendas,” Asian Survey 36:5 (May 1996): 511–22 (513)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bae, Jong-yun and Myong, Sejin, “South Korea’s Foreign Policy toward Korean Issues: The Feasibility for Independent Variable and its Limits,” Korea and World Politics 27:4 (Winter 2011): 40–42 (in Korean)Google Scholar
Koo, Bonhak and Nam, Changhee, “South Korea’s Sunshine Policy and the Inter-Korean Security Relations,” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 13:1 (Autumn 2001): 79–101 (80)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Republic of Korea Ministry of Unification, Kim Dae-jung’s Policies on North Korea: Achievements and Future Goals (Seoul: Yangdong, 1999) (in Korean)Google Scholar
Berry, William E., Global Security Watch: Korea: A Reference Handbook (Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2008)Google Scholar
Creekmore, Marion V., A Moment of Crisis: Jimmy Carter, the Power of a Peacemaker, and North Korea’s Nuclear Ambitions (New York: Public Affairs, 2006), 57–58Google Scholar
Weiner, Eric, “Honor Guard,” in Peloso, Jennifer (ed.), The Two Koreas, Reference Shelf 76 (New York: H.W. Wilson, 2004), 88–91Google Scholar
Heo, Uk and Woo, Jung-yeop, “Changing National Identity and Security Perception in South Korea,” in Roehrig, Terence, Seo, Jungmin, and Heo, Uk (eds.), Korean Security in a Changing East Asia (Westport, CT: Praeger Security International, 2007), 192–206Google Scholar
Bluth, Christopher, Crisis: On the Korean Peninsula (Washington, DC: Potomac Books, 2011)Google Scholar
Hwang, Eui-gak, “Inter-Korean Economic Cooperation: The Need for Reciprocity – Does Lopsided Cooperation Continue to Soothe North’s Bluffing Mentality?International Journal of Korean Studies 12:1 (Fall/Winter 2008): 101–26 (102)Google Scholar
Roehrig, Terence, “The Dispute over the Northern Limit Line: Toward a Negotiated Settlement,” Korea Observer 39:4 (Winter 2008): 507–37Google Scholar
Yin, Yap Su, “Dialogue with Pyongyang Still the Way to Go, Says Seoul; Minister Repeats Government Stand that Nuclear Crisis Cannot Be Resolved by Sanctions or Military Force,” Straits Times, June 28, 2003Google Scholar
Tait, Richard, “Playing by the Rules in Korea: Lessons Learned in the North-South Economic Engagement,” Asian Survey 43:2 (March/April 2003): 305–28 (308)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Noland, Marcus, “Sanctioning North Korea: The Political Economy of Denuclearization and Proliferation,” Asian Survey 50:3 (May/June 2010): 539–68 (541)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bae, Jong-yun, “South Korean Strategic Thinking toward North Korea: The Evolution of the Engagement Policy and its Impact on US-ROK Relations,” Asian Survey 50:2 (March/April 2010): 335–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Choong-nam, “Inter-Korean Relations and the Future of the US-ROK Alliance,” International Journal of Korean Studies 10:2 (Fall/Winter 2006): 75–106Google Scholar
Funabashi, Yoichi, The Peninsula Questions: A Chronicle of the Second Korean Nuclear Crisis (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2007), 215Google Scholar
Snyder, Scott, “South Korea’s Squeeze Play,” Washington Quarterly 28:4 (Autumn 2005): 93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cha, Do-hyeong, “Challenges and Opportunities: The Participatory Government’s Policy toward North Korea,” East Asian Review 16:2 (Summer 2004): 97–110Google Scholar
Snyder, Scott, “Lee Myung-bak’s Foreign Policy: A 250-Day Assessment,” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 21:1 (March 2011): 85–102 (85)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Mark, “A Holiday in North Korea amid Cross-Border Tensions,” New York Times, April 15, 2011Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats