Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-5rzhg Total loading time: 0.428 Render date: 2021-12-09T15:19:39.394Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

11 - Semi-empirical modelling of the response of soil respiration to environmental factors in laboratory and field conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Werner L. Kutsch
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Biogeochemie, Jena
Michael Bahn
Affiliation:
Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Austria
Andreas Heinemeyer
Affiliation:
Stockholm Environmental Institute, University of York
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Soil respiration, globally 68–80 Pg C y−1, represents the second largest carbon flux between ecosystems and the atmosphere (Schimel et al., 1996; Raich et al., 2002). This is more than ten times the current rate of fossil fuel combustion and indicates that each year around 10% of the atmosphere's CO2 cycles through the soil. Thus, even a small change in soil respiration could significantly intensify – or mitigate – current atmospheric increases of CO2, with potential feedbacks to climate change. Despite this global significance and the considerable scientific commitment to its study over the last decades, there is still limited comprehensive understanding of the factors controlling temporal and across-ecosystem variability of soil respiration.

This understanding is largely hampered by the fact that studies are often conducted and compared at different temporal and spatial scales that are not compatible. Since, particularly in large-scale studies, factors influencing soil respiration often correlate with each other, responses of soil respiration to those factors are confounded and only apparent relationships are obtained.

For the purpose of this chapter, methods (and their associated problems) for analyzing soil respiration data from different scales are reviewed and jointly interpreted with emphasis on the temperature dependence of soil respiration.

MODELLING SOIL RESPIRATION: AN OVERVIEW

General modelling approaches

Soil respiration – defined as the CO2 efflux from the soil surface – originates from the metabolic activity of roots (autotrophic respiration), micro-organisms (bacteria, actinomycetes and fungi) and soil meso- and macro-fauna (heterotrophic respiration).

Type
Chapter
Information
Soil Carbon Dynamics
An Integrated Methodology
, pp. 207 - 220
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amthor, J. S. (2000) The McCree–de Wit-Penning de Vries–Thornley respiration paradigms: 30 years later. Annals of Botany, 86, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. M. (1991) The effects of climate change on decomposition processes in grassland and coniferous forests. Ecological Applications, 1, 326–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrén, O. and Kätterer, T. (1997) ICBM: the introductory carbon balance model for exploration of soil carbon balances. Ecological Applications, 7, 1226–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrén, O. and Paustian, K. (1987) Barley straw decomposition in the field: comparison of models. Ecology, 68, 1190–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrhenius, S. (1889) Über die Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit bei der Inversion von Rohrzucker durch Säuren. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, 4, 226–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkin, O. K. and Tjoelker, M. G. (2003) Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature. Trends in Plant Science, 8, 343–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bååth, E. and Wallander, H. (2003) Soil and rhizosphere microorganisms have the same Q10 for respiration in a model system. Global Change Biology, 9, 1788–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beare, M. H., Coleman, D. C., Crossley, D. A. J., Hendrix, P. F. and Odum, E. P. (1995) A hierarchical approach to evaluating the significance of soil biodiversity to biogeochemical cycling. Plant and Soil, 170, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, H. F. (1958) The effect of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen availability. Plant and Soil, 10, 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blet-Charaudeau, C., Muller, J. and Laudelout, H. (1990) Kinetics of carbon dioxide evolution in relation to microbial biomass and temperature. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54, 1324–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond-Lamberty, B., Wang, C. and Gower, S. T. (2004) A global relationship between the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of soil respiration?Global Change Biology, 10, 1756–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, R. D., Nadelhoffer, K., Canary, J. D. and Kaye, J. P. (1998) Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration. Nature, 396, 570–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borken, W., Xu, Y.-J., Brumme, R. and Lamersdorf, N. (1999) A climate change scenario for carbon dioxide and dissolved organic carbon fluxes from a temperate forest soil: drought and rewetting effects. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63, 1848–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borken, W., Davidson, E. A., Savage, K., Gaudinski, J. and Trumbore, S. E. (2003) Drying and wetting effects on carbon dioxide release from organic horizons. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67, 1888–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunnell, F. L., Tait, D. E. N., Flanagan, P. W. and Cleve, K. (1977) Microbial respiration and substrate weight loss. I. A general model of the influences of abiotic variables. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 9, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlyle, J. C. and Than, U. B. (1988) Abiotic controls of soil respiration beneath an eighteen-year-old Pinus radiata stand in south-eastern Australia. Journal of Ecology, 76, 654–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curiel Yuste, J., Janssens, I. A., Carrara, A. and Ceulemans, R. (2004) Annual Q10 of soil respiration reflects plant phenological patterns as well as temperature sensitivity. Global Change Biology, 10, 161–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, E. A. and Janssens, I. A. (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 440, 165–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, E. A., Belk, E. and Boone, R. D. (1998) Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in temperate mixed hardwood forest. Global Change Biology, 4, 217–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, E. A., Janssens, I. A. and Luo, Y. Q. (2006) On the variability of respiration in terrestrial ecosystems: moving beyond Q10. Global Change Biology, 12, 154–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, C. and Moncrieff, J. B. (1999) A model for soil CO2 production and transport 1: model development. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 95, 225–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giardina, C. P. and Ryan, M. G. (2000) Evidence that decomposition rates of organic carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature. Nature, 404, 858–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, A., Weihermüller, L., Huisman, J. A.et al. (2008) Measurement depth effects on the apparent temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in field studies. Biogeosciences Discussions, 5, 1867–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, P. J., Wullschleger, S. D., Bohlmann, S. A. and Todd, D. E. (1993) Seasonal and topographic patterns of forest floor CO2 efflux from an upland oak forest. Tree Physiology, 13, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Högberg, P., Nordgren, A., Buchmann, N.et al. (2001) Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration. Nature, 411, 789–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard, D. M. and Howard, P. J. A. (1993) Relationships between CO2 evolution, moisture content and temperature for a range of soil types. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 25, 1537–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, H. W. (1977) A simulation model for decomposition in grasslands. Ecology, 58, 469–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, H. W., Cole, C. V., Klein, D. A. and Coleman, D. C. (1977) A simulation model for the effect of predation on bacteria in continuous culture. Microbial Ecology, 3, 259–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssens, I. A. and Pilegaard, K. (2003) Large seasonal changes in Q10 of soil respiration in a beech forest. Global Change Biology, 9, 911–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssens, I. A., Lankreijer, H., Matteucci, G.et al. (2001) Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests. Global Change Biology, 7, 269–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssens, I. A., Dore, S., Epron, D.et al. (2003) Climatic influences on seasonal and spatial differences in soil CO2 efflux. In Fluxes of Carbon, Water and Energy of European Forests, ed. Valentini, R.. Vol. 163. Ecological Studies. Berlin: Springer, pp. 233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kätterer, T., Reichstein, M., Andrén, O. and Lomander, A. (1998) Temperature dependence of organic matter decomposition: a critical review using literature data analyzed with different models. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 27, 258–62.Google Scholar
Keith, H., Jacobsen, K. L. and Raison, R. J. (1997) Effects of soil phosphorus availability, temperature and moisture on soil respiration in Eucalyptus pauciflora forest. Plant and Soil, 190, 127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killham, K. (1994) Soil Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirschbaum, M. U. F. (1995) The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic carbon storage. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 27, 753–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr, W. and Kattge, J. (2005) Inversion of terrestrial ecosystem model parameter values against eddy covariance measurements by Monte Carlo sampling. Global Change Biology, 11, 1333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalski, A. S., Serrano-Ortiz, P., Janssens, I. A.et al. (2008) Can flux tower research neglect geochemical CO2 exchange?Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148, 1045–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liski, J., Ilvesniemi, H., Mäkelä, A. and Westman, C. J. (1999) CO2 emissions from soil in response to climatic warming are overestimated: the decomposition of old soil organic matter is tolerant of temperature. Ambio, 28, 171–4.Google Scholar
Lloyd, J. and Taylor, J. A. (1994) On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional Ecology, 8, 315–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. J. and Holmes, J. W. (1988) Soil Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meentemeyer, V. (1978) Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology, 59, 465–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, L. and Menten, M. L. (1913) Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. Biochemische Zeitschrift, 49, 334–6.Google Scholar
Miller, R. D. and Johnson, D. D. (1964) The effect of soil moisture tension on carbon dioxide evolution, nitrification, and nitrogen mineralization. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 28, 644–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyano, F., Kutsch, W. and Schulze, E.-D. (2008) Response of mycorrhizal, rhizosphere and soil basal respiration to temperature and photosynthesis in a barley field. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39, 843–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, R. J. K., Campbell, C. A. and Weier, K. L. (1982) Quantitative relationships between net nitrogen mineralization and moisture content of soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 62, 111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, A. M. (1990) Microbial decomposition (respiration) of litter in eucalypt forests of south-western Australia: an empirical model based on laboratory incubations. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 22, 153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orchard, V. A. and Cook, F. J. (1983) Relationship between soil respiration and soil moisture. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 15, 447–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, W. J., Schimel, D. S., Cole, C. V. and Ojima, D. S. (1987) Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in the Great Plains. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51, 1173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavelka, M., Acosta, M., Marek, M. V., Kutsch, W. and Janous, D. (2007) Dependence of the Q10 values on the depth of the soil temperature measuring point. Plant and Soil, 292, 171–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raich, J. W. and Potter, C. S. (1995) Global patterns of carbon dioxide emissions from soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 9, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raich, J. W. and Schlesinger, W. H. (1992) The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus, 44B, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raich, J. W. and Tufekcioglu, A. (2000) Vegetation and soil respiration: correlations and controls. Biogeochemistry, 48, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raich, J. W., Potter, C. S. and Bhagawati, D. (2002) Interannual variability in global soil respiration, 1980–1994. Global Change Biology, 8, 800–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratkowsky, D. A., Olley, J., Mcmeekin, T. A. and Ball, A. (1982) Relationship between temperature and growth rate of bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology, 149, 1–5.Google Scholar
Reichstein, M., Bednorz, F., Broll, G. and Kätterer, T. (2000) Temperature dependence of carbon mineralisation: conclusions from a long-term incubation of subalpine soil samples. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32, 947–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichstein, M., Rey, A., Freibauer, A.et al. (2003a) Modeling temporal and large-scale spatial variability of soil respiration from soil water availability, temperature and vegetation productivity indices. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17, 1104, doi:10.1029/2003GB002035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichstein, M., Tenhunen, J., Roupsard, O.et al. (2003b) Inverse modeling of seasonal drought effects on canopy CO2/H2O exchange in three Mediterranean ecosystems. Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 4726, doi:10.1029/2003JD003430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichstein, M., Subke, J.-A., Angeli, A. C. and Tenhunen, J. D. (2005) Does the temperature sensitivity of decomposition of soil organic matter depend upon water content, soil horizon, or incubation time?Global Change Biology, 11, 1754–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reth, S., Reichstein, M. and Falge, E. (2005) The effect of soil water content, soil temperature, soil pH-value and the root mass on soil CO2 efflux: a modified model. Plant and Soil, 268, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigo, A., Recous, S., Neel, C. and Mary, B. (1997) Modelling temperature and moisture effects on C–N transformations in soils: comparison of nine models. Ecological Modelling, 102, 325–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, D. J. and Cairns, A. (1978) Influence of temperature on biochemical processes in some soils from tussock grasslands. 1. Respiratory activity. New Zealand Journal of Science, 21, 581–9.Google Scholar
Sacks, W. J., Schimel, D. S., Monson, R. K. and Braswell, B. H. (2006) Model-data synthesis of diurnal and seasonal CO2 fluxes at Niwot Ridge, Colorado. Global Change Biology, 12, 240–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimel, D., Alves, D., Enting, I.et al. (1996) CO2 and the carbon cycle. In Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC, ed. Houghton, J. T., Filho, L. G. M., Callander, B. A.et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar
Schinner, F., Öhlinger, R., Kandeler, E. and Margesin, R. (1993) Bodenbiologische Arbeitsmethoden. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skopp, J., Jawson, M. D. and Doran, J. W. (1990) Steady-state aerobic microbial activity as a function of soil-water content. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54, 1619–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommers, L. E., Gilmour, C. M., Wildung, R. E. and Beck, S. M. (1981) The effect of water potential on decomposition processes in soils. In Water Potential Relations in Soil Microbiology, ed. Parr, J. F., Gardner, W. R. and Elliott, L. F.. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication No. 9. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, pp. 97–117Google Scholar
Stanford, G. and Epstein, E. (1974) Nitrogen mineralization – water relations in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 38, 103–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subke, J.-A., Hahn, V., Battipaglia, G.et al. (2004) Feedback interactions between needle litter decomposition and rhizosphere activity. Oecologia, 139, 551–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subke, J.-A., Inglima, I. and Francesca Cotrufo, M. (2006) Trends and methodological impacts in soil CO2 efflux partitioning: a metaanalytical review. Global Change Biology, 12, 921–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarantola, A. (1994) Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Tjoelker, M. G., Oleksyn, J. and Reich, P. B. (2001) Modelling respiration of vegetation: evidence for a general temperature-dependent Q10. Global Change Biology, 7, 223–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Updegraff, K., Pastor, J., Bridgham, S. D. and Johnston, C. A. (1995) Environmental and substrate controls over carbon and nitrogen mineralization in northern wetlands. Ecological Applications, 5, 151–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentini, R., Matteucci, G., Dolman, A. J.et al. (2000) Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature, 404, 861–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van't Hoff, J. H. (1898) Lectures on Theoretical and Physical Chemistry. Part 1: Chemical Dynamics (translated by Lehfeldt, R. A.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Waksman, S. A. and Gerretsen, F. C. (1931) Influence of temperature and moisture upon the nature and extent of decomposition of plant residues by microorganisms. Ecology, 12, 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, J. P., Cherry, R. S. and Schlesinger, W. H. (1996) The Q10 relationship of microbial respiration in a temperate forest soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 28, 1067–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, L. and Baldocchi, D. D. (2004) Seasonal variation in carbon dioxide exchange over a Mediterranean annual grassland in California. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 123, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×