Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-5rzhg Total loading time: 0.282 Render date: 2021-12-09T13:15:10.710Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

15 - Appendix: Towards a standardized protocol for the measurement of soil CO2 efflux

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Werner L. Kutsch
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Biogeochemie, Jena
Michael Bahn
Affiliation:
Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Austria
Andreas Heinemeyer
Affiliation:
Stockholm Environmental Institute, University of York
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Soil CO2 efflux, more commonly termed soil respiration, is considered to be the second largest flux of carbon between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. Current estimates of global soil respiration are in the range of 68–80 Pg C a−1 (Raich and Potter, 1995; Raich et al., 2002), which exceeds estimated annual rates from fossil fuel combustion by an order of magnitude (Schlesinger and Andrews, 2000; IPCC, 2007). It must be noted that these estimates of global soil CO2 efflux are based on a very limited dataset: (1) the distribution of data for biomes is biased towards forests in the Northern hemisphere; (2) a considerable proportion of the data is based on static chamber measurements, which tend to underestimate soil respiration at high flux rates (Norman et al., 1997; Chapter 2, Pumpanen et al.); (3) annual estimates are often based on simplistic relationships (generally only temperature and sometimes also soil moisture) that capture only a limited fraction of the diurnal, seasonal, annual and inter-annual variation of soil respiration and (4) the spatial variation of soil respiration is generally not well captured, both within ecosystems and across similar ecosystems at a regional scale.

A further major problem for obtaining sensible estimates of global soil CO2 efflux is related to the fact that even though an increasing amount of data is becoming available, these more recent datasets are often not easily comparable due to different methodologies and to the limited availability of ancillary parameters.

Type
Chapter
Information
Soil Carbon Dynamics
An Integrated Methodology
, pp. 272 - 280
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubinet, M., Grelle, A., Ibrom, A.et al. (2000) Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forests: the EUROFLUX methodology. Advances in Ecological Research, 30, 113–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahn, M., Rodeghiero, M., Anderson-Dunn, M.et al. (2008) Soil respiration in European grasslands in relation to climate and assimilate supply. Ecosystems, 11, 1352–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bain, W. G., Hutyra, L., Patterson, D. C.et al. (2005) Wind-induced error in the measurement of soil respiration using closed dynamic chambers. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 131, 225–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldocchi, D., Falge, E., Gu, L. H.et al. (2001) FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 82, 2415–34.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldocchi, D., Tang, J. W. and Xu, L. K. (2006) How switches and lags in biophysical regulators affect spatial-temporal variation of soil respiration in an oak-grass savanna – art. no. G02008. Journal of Geophysical Research – Biogeosciences, 111, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, E. A. and Janssens, I. A. (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature, 440, 165–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, E. A., Savage, K., Verchot, L. V. and Navarro, R. (2002) Minimizing artifacts and biases in chamber-based measurements of soil respiration. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 113, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, E. A., Savage, K. E., Trumbore, S. E. and Borken, W. (2006a) Vertical partitioning of CO2 production within a temperate forest soil. Global Change Biology, 12, 944–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, E. A., Janssens, I. A. and Luo, Y. Q. (2006b) On the variability of respiration in terrestrial ecosystems: moving beyond Q10. Global Change Biology, 12, 154–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drewitt, G. B., Black, T. A., Nesic, Z.et al. (2002) Measuring forest floor CO2 fluxes in a Douglas-fir forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 110, 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elberling, B. and Brandt, K. K. (2003) Uncoupling of microbial CO2 production and release in frozen soil and its implications for field studies of arctic C cycling. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35, 263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierer, N. and Schimel, J. P. (2003) A proposed mechanism for the pulse in carbon dioxide production commonly observed following the rapid rewetting of a dry soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67, 798–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, A., Weihermüller, L., Huisman, J. A.et al. (2008) Measurement depth effects on the apparent temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in field studies. Biogeosciences Discussions, 5, 1867–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubbs, F. E. (1969) Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics, 11, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gu, L. H., Post, W. M. and King, A. W. (2004) Fast labile carbon turnover obscures sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration from soil to temperature: a model analysis – art. no. GB1022. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 18, B1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, P. J., Edwards, N. T., Garten, C. T. and Andrews, J. A. (2000) Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry, 48, 115–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, P. J., O'Neill, E. G. and Chambers, M. L. S. (2003) Soil respiration and litter decomposition. In North American Temperate Deciduous Forest Responses to Changing Precipitation Regimes, ed. Hanson, P. J. and Wullschleger, S. D.. New York: Springer, pp. 163–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemeyer, A., Hartley, I. P., Evans, S. P., Fuente, J. A. C. and Ineson, P. (2007) Forest soil CO2 flux: uncovering the contribution and environmental responses of ectomycorrhizas. Global Change Biology, 13, 1786–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbard, K. A., Law, B. E., Reichstein, M. and Sulzman, J. (2005) An analysis of soil respiration across northern hemisphere temperate ecosystems. Biogeochemistry, 73, 29–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, T., Kim, H. and Tanaka, Y. (2003) Long-term half-hourly measurement of soil CO2 concentration and soil respiration in a temperate deciduous forest – art. no. 4631. Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 108, 4631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollinger, D. Y. and Richardson, A. D. (2005) Uncertainty in eddy covariance measurements and its application to physiological models. Tree Physiology, 25, 873–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis – Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janssens, I. A., Lankreijer, H., Matteucci, G.et al. (2001) Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests. Global Change Biology, 7, 269–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jassal, R. S., Black, T. A., Drewitt, G. B.et al. (2004) A model of the production and transport of CO2 in soil: predicting soil CO2 concentrations and CO2 efflux from a forest floor. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 124, 219–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jassal, R. S., Black, T. A., Novak, M.et al. (2005) Relationship between soil CO2 concentrations and forest-floor CO2 effluxes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 130, 176–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutsch, W. L. (1996) Untersuchung zur Bodenatmung zweier Ackerstandorte im Bereich der Bornhöveder Seenkette. EcoSys, Beiträge zur Ökosystemforschung, Suppl. 16.Google Scholar
Kutsch, W. L., Staack, A., Wötzel, J., Middelhoff, U. and Kappen, L. (2001) Field measurements of root respiration and total soil respiration in an alder forest. New Phytologist, 150, 157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzyakov, Y. (2002) Review: factors affecting rhizosphere priming effects. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 165, 382–96.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzyakov, Y. (2006) Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 425–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dantec, V., Epron, D. and Dufrene, E. (1999) Soil CO2 efflux in a beech forest: comparison of two closed dynamic systems. Plant and Soil, 214, 125–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longdoz, B., Yernaux, M. and Aubinet, M. (2000) Soil CO2 efflux measurements in a mixed forest: impact of chamber disturbances, spatial variability and seasonal evolution. Global Change Biology, 6, 907–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, C. P., Riley, W. J., Pierce, L. L. and Field, C. B. (1999) The effects of chamber pressurization on soil-surface CO2 flux and the implications for NEE measurements under elevated CO2. Global Change Biology, 5, 269–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moldrup, P., Olsen, T., Yamaguchi, T., Schjonning, P. and Rolston, D. E. (1999) Modelling diffusion and reaction in soil. IX. The Buckingham-Burdine–Campbell equation for gas diffusivity in undisturbed soil. Soil Science, 164, 542–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monson, R. K., Burns, S. P., Williams, M. W.et al. (2006) The contribution of beneath-snow soil respiration to total ecosystem respiration in a high-elevation, subalpine forest. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 20, GB3030, doi:10.1029/2005GB002684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, J. M., Kucharik, C. J., Gower, S. T.et al. (1997) A comparison of six methods for measuring soil-surface carbon dioxide fluxes. Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 102, D24, 28771–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papale, D., Reichstein, M., Aubinet, M.et al. (2006) Towards a standardized processing of Net Ecosystem Exchange measured with eddy covariance technique: algorithms and uncertainty estimation. Biogeosciences, 3, 571–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavelka, M., Acosta, M., Marek, M. V., Kutsch, W. and Janous, D. (2007) Dependence of the Q10 values on the depth of the soil temperature measuring point. Plant and Soil, 292, 171–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendall, E., Del Grosso, S., King, J. Y.et al. (2003) Elevated atmospheric CO2 effects and soil water feedbacks on soil respiration components in a Colorado grassland. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17, 1046, doi:10.1029/ 2001GB001821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pumpanen, J., Kolari, P., Ilvesniemi, H.et al. (2004) Comparison of different chamber techniques for measuring soil CO2 efflux. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 123, 159–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raich, J. W. and Potter, C. S. (1995) Global patterns of carbon dioxide emissions from soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 9, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raich, J. W., Potter, C. S. and Bhagawati, D. (2002) Interannual variability in global soil respiration, 1980–94. Global Change Biology, 8, 800–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichstein, M., Rey, A., Freibauer, A.et al. (2003) Modeling temporal and large-scale spatial variability of soil respiration from soil water availability, temperature and vegetation productivity indices – art. no. 1104. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17, 1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichstein, M., Subke, J. A.Angeli, A. C. and Tenhunen, J. D. (2005a) Does the temperature sensitivity of decomposition of soil organic matter depend upon water content, soil horizon, or incubation time?Global Change Biology, 11, 1754–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichstein, M., Katterer, T., Andren, O.et al. (2005b) Temperature sensitivity of decomposition in relation to soil organic matter pools: critique and outlook. Biogeosciences, 2, 317–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, A. D. and Hollinger, D. Y. (2005) Statistical modeling of ecosystem respiration using eddy covariance data: maximum likelihood parameter estimation, and Monte Carlo simulation model and parameter uncertainty, applied to three simple models. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 131, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodeghiero, M. and Cescatti, A. (2005) Main determinants of forest soil respiration along an elevation/temperature gradient in the Italian Alps. Global Change Biology, 11, 1024–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, L. and Hedderich, J. (2006) Angewandte Statistik. Methodensammlung mit R; mit 180 Tabellen, 12th edn. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Sampson, D. A., Janssens, I. A., Yuste, J. C. and Ceulemans, R. (2007) Basal rates of soil respiration are correlated with photosynthesis in a mixed temperate forest. Global Change Biology, 13, 2008–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, K., Davidson, E. A. and Richardson, A. D. (2008) A conceptual and practical approach to data quality and analysis procedures for high-frequency soil respiration measurements. Functional Ecology, doi: 10.1111/j.1365–2435.2008.01414.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, K. E. and Davidson, E. A. (2003) A comparison of manual and automated systems for soil CO2 flux measurements: trade-offs between spatial and temporal resolution. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, 891–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlesinger, W. H. and Andrews, J. A. (2000) Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle. Biogeochemistry, 48, 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subke, J. A., Hahn, V., Battipaglia, G.et al. (2004) Feedback interactions between needle litter decomposition and rhizosphere activity. Oecologia, 139, 551–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subke, J. A., Inglima, I. and Cotrufo, M. F. (2006) Trends and methodological impacts in soil CO2 efflux partitioning: a metaanalytical review. Global Change Biology, 12, 921–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takle, E. S., Massman, W. J., Brandle, J. R.et al. (2004) Influence of high-frequency ambient pressure pumping on carbon dioxide efflux from soil. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 124, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, J. W., Baldocchi, D. D., Qi, Y. and Xu, L. K. (2003) Assessing soil CO2 efflux using continuous measurements of CO2 profiles in soils with small solid-state sensors. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 118, 207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, J. W., Baldocchi, D. D. and Xu, L. (2005) Tree photosynthesis modulates soil respiration on a diurnal time scale. Global Change Biology, 11, 1298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welles, J. M., Demetriades-Shah, T. H. and McDermitt, D. K. (2001) Considerations for measuring ground CO2 effluxes with chambers. Chemical Geology, 177, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, D., Grathwohl, P. and Hohener, P. (2004) Review of field methods for the determination of the tortuosity and effective gas-phase diffusivity in the vadose zone. Vadose Zone Journal, 3, 1240–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, L., Furtaw, M. D., Madsen, R. A.et al. (2006) On maintaining pressure equilibrium between a soil CO2 flux chamber and the ambient air. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D08S10, doi:10.1029/2005JD006435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×