Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5959bf8d4d-89n48 Total loading time: 0.37 Render date: 2022-12-10T00:15:34.655Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

16 - Intergroup Schadenfreude

Conditions and Consequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2011

Russell Spears
Affiliation:
Cardiff University
Colin Wayne Leach
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Larissa Z. Tiedens
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Colin Wayne Leach
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

People can feel just as strongly about their membership in groups as they do about any other feature of their lives. Recent theory and research marrying social identity theory with appraisal and other approaches to emotion is beginning to show how important emotions are to the group and intergroup aspects of social life. In this chapter, we develop the intergroup emotion perspective by focusing on schadenfreude – a malicious pleasure that group members can take in the suffering of another group. We believe schadenfreude is an important, if somewhat obscure, emotion because it is an insidious expression of a malevolent feeling that can do serious harm to intergroup relations.

THE SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY OF INTERGROUP RELATIONS

The social identity theory tradition has been particularly useful in defining the group level of self and specifying the relations between groups that can structure psychological experience (Tajfel & Turner, 1986). Although Tajfel (1978, p. 63) referred to the “emotional significance” attached to group membership as a defining feature of social identity, classic social identity theory offers a rather generic account of the affective side of group life. Thus, the evaluation of ingroups and outgroups is typically characterized along a single dimension of valence that ranges from the self-directed positivity of ingroup favoritism to the other-directed negativity of outgroup derogation. This fairly simple characterization of group evaluation is belied by other aspects of a theoretical framework that emphasizes the complexities of intergroup relations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, M. G., Brewer, M. B., & Herrmann, R. K. (1999). Images and affect: A functional analysis of out-group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 78–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotions and personality, Volume 1. Psychological aspects. New York: Columbia University Press
Bettelheim, B., & Janowitz, M. (1964). Social change and prejudice. New York: Free Press
Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell
Branscombe, N. R., & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capote, T. (1975). Music for chameleons. Vintage: New York
Diehl, M. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn't all bad: The strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, N., Rijswijk, W., Roefs, M., & Simons, C. (1997). Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 186–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall: Theory and research concerning tall poppies. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 1–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feather, N. T., & Sherman, R. (2002). Envy, resentment, schadenfreude, and sympathy: Reactions to deserved and undeserved achievement and subsequent failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 953–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting vs. (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frijda, N. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Goldhagen, D. J. (1996). Hitler's willing executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. New York: Knopf
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: J. Wiley & SonsCrossRef
Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Crosby, F. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117–129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jetten, J., Spears, R., Hogg, M. A., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2000). Discrimination constrained and justified: Variable effects of group variability and in-group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 329–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. E., & Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, C. W., Snider, S., & Iyer, A. (2002). “Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate”: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 136–163). New York: Cambridge University Press
Leach, C. W., & Spears, R. (2002). “Without cruelty there is no festival”: Gloating over the suffering of a lower status group. Manuscript under review, University of California, Santa Cruz
Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 932–943CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, D. M., Silver, L. A., & Smith, E. R. (this volume). Intergroup emotions: Emotion as an intergroup phenomenon
Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (Eds.). (2002). From prejudice to intergroup relations: Differentiated reactions to social groups. Philadelphia: Psychology Press
Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummendey, A., & Otten, S. (1998). Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 107–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mummendey, A., & Simon, B. (1989). Better or different? III: The impact of importance of comparison dimension and relative ingroup size upon inter-group discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1961). Thus spoke zarathustra (trans. R. J. Hollingdale) (p. 123). New York: Penguin. (Original work published 1883–1885.)
Nietzsche, F. (1967). On the genealogy of morals (trans. W. Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale) (p. 127). New York: Random House. (Original work published 1887.)
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. New York: Cambridge University
Oxford English Dictionary. (1989). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological measures (Vol. 1; pp. 17–59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, IncCrossRef
Reicher, S. D., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheepers, D., Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2002). Diversity in discrimination: Structural factors, situational features, and social functions. Manuscript submitted for publication
Smith, E. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward a new conceptualization of prejudice. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping (pp. 297–315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, IncCrossRef
Smith, R. H. (1991). Envy and the sense of injustice. In P. Salovey (Ed.), The psychology of jealousy and envy (pp. 79–99). New York: Guilford Press
Smith, R. H., Turner, T. J., Garonzik, R., Leach, C. W., Urch, V., & Weston, C. (1996). Envy and schadenfreude. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 158–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Doosje, B. (2002). The (il)legitimacy of ingroup bias: From social reality to social resistance. In J. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 332–362). New York: Cambridge University Press
Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, R., & Smith, H. J. (2001). Experiments as politics. Political Psychology, 22, 309–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. New York: University Press
Struch, N., & Schwartz, S. H. (1989). Intergroup aggression: Its predictors and distinctness from ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 364–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). London: Academic Press
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson Hall
Van Dijk, W. Yedema, M., Goslinga, S., & Ouwerkerk, J. (2002). Jammer joh! [What a shame!] In D. A. Stapel, M. Hagendoom & E. Van Dijk (Eds.), Jaarboek Sociale Psychologie 2001 (pp. 271–310). Delft: Eburon
Wills, T. A. (1981). Downward comparison principles in social psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 245–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, T. A. (1991). Similarity and self-esteem in downward comparison. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: contemporary theory and research (pp. 51–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
17
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×