Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-ntdpv Total loading time: 0.296 Render date: 2022-01-27T21:55:08.794Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

7 - The Emotional Convergence Hypothesis

Implications for Individuals, Relationships, and Cultures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2011

Cameron Anderson
Affiliation:
New York University
Dacher Keltner
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Larissa Z. Tiedens
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Colin Wayne Leach
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Get access

Summary

Imagine the following scenario. Susan and Tom have just started dating and are dining at a local restaurant. The service has been slow, and as they wait for the check Tom is furious and wants to complain to the manager. Susan, on the other hand, notes how busy the restaurant has been, and feels sympathy for the overworked, harried waiter – if anything, she wants to leave a large tip. Susan and Tom argue about the matter and leave in a huff.

This sort of interpersonal problem, all too familiar to many of us, arises in part when people have different emotional reactions to events. When individuals' emotions diverge in social interactions, they are left to grapple with their different perceptions, action tendencies, and often uncharitable explanations for why they differ. Had Susan and Tom both felt sympathy for the waiter, they would have agreed on the reasons for the slow service, a course of action, and perhaps felt solidarity in their shared response.

Based on the idea that it is adaptive for relationship partners to have similar emotional reactions to events, we propose that people in close relationships develop increasing similarity in their emotional responses over time – a process we call emotional convergence. Furthermore, we propose that people with less power make more of the change necessary for emotional convergence to occur. In this chapter, we elaborate on the theoretical basis for these hypotheses and draw on recent longitudinal studies of relationships to provide supportive evidence.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Areflli, L. K., Kenny, D. A., & Weiner, D. (2001). The importance of similarity and understanding of partners' marital ideals to relationship satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 8, 167–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116–132CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, C. Thompson, L., & Choi, H. S. (2004). Emotional similarity and the formation of coalitions in multi-party competitive environments. Manuscript in preparation
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relationship schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart's content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2000). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 197–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, J. (1988). Form and function in motor mimicry: Topographic evidence that the primary function is communication. Human Communication Research, 14, 275–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, P. A. (1978). Affective state, attraction, and affiliation: Misery loves happy company, too. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 616–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1983). Interpersonal attraction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
Campbell, D. T. (1975). On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist, 30, 1103–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1985). Vervet monkey alarm calls: Manipulation through shared information?Behaviour, 94, 150–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, H. S., Anderson, C., & Thompson, L. (2004). Emotional diversity and workgroup performance. Manuscript in preparation
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Collins, R. (1990). Stratification, emotional energy, and the transient emotions. In T. D. Kemper (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions (pp. 27–57). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
Deutsch, F., M., & Mackesy, M. E. (1985). Friendship and the development of self-schemas: The effects of talking about others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P. (1973). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 207–283
Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L. (1951). Architecture and group membership. Journal of Social Issues, 7, 152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, T., Healy, B. T., Goldstein, S., & Guthertz, M. (1990). Behavior-state matching and synchrony in mother-infant interactions of nondepressed versus depressed dyads. Developmental Psychology, 26, 7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48 (6), 621–628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forgas, J. P. (2002). Feeling and doing: Affective influences on interpersonal behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–165). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research
Frijda, N. H., & Mesquita, B. (1994). The social roles and functions of emotions. In S. Kitayama & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 51–88). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Gaensbauer, T. J., Harmon, R. J., Cytryn, L., & McKnew, D. H. (1984). Social and affective development in infants with a manic-depressive parent. American Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 223–229Google ScholarPubMed
Gray-Little, B., & Burks, N. (1983). Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 513–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 87–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press
Hogue, A., & Steinberg, L. (1995). Homophily in internalized distress in adolescent peer groups. Developmental Psychology, 31, 897–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, M. J., Hokanson, J. E., & Loewenstein, D. A. (1985). Induction of depressive affect after prolonged exposure to a mildly depressed individual. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1110–1113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsee, C. K., Hatfield, E., Carlson, J. G., & Chemtob, C. (1990). The effect of power on susceptibility to emotional contagion. Cognition & Emotion, 4, 327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, I. (1982) Groupthink. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 99–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C., & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 740–752CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2001). Social functions of emotions. In T. J. Mayne & G. A. Bonanno (Eds.), Emotions: Current issues and future directions. New York: Guilford
Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (1998). Emotion, social function, and psychopathology. Review of General Psychology, 2, 320–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., & Robinson, R. J. (1997). Defending the status quo: Power and bias in social conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1066–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemper, T. D. (1991). Predicting emotions from social relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 330–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFrance, M., & Ickes, W. (1981). Posture mirroring and interactional involvement: Sex and sex typing effects. Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 139–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levenson, R. W. (1994). Human emotions: A functional view. In P. Ekman & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. New York: Oxford University Press
Levenson, R. W., & Ruef, A. M. (1994). Empathy: A physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 234–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, K. D., & Horowitz, L. M. (1990). Satisfaction in interpersonal interactions as a function of similarity in level of dysphoria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 823–831CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, D., Kudoh, T., Scherer, K., & Wallbott, H. (1988). Antecedents of and reactions to emotions in the United States and Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19, 267–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesquita, B., & Frijda, N. H. (1992). Cultural variations in emotions: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 179–204CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owens, D. A., & Sutton, R. I. (2001). Status contests in meetings: Negotiating the informal order. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 25–35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates
Preston, S. D., & Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximal bases. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 25, 1–72Google Scholar
Price, R. A., & Vandenberg, S. G. (1980). Spouse similarity in American and Swedish couples. Behavior Genetics, 10, 59–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raghunathan, T. E., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Comparing correlated but nonoverlapping correlations. Psychological Methods, 1, 178–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, A., & Greenberg, J. (1988). Depression and interpersonal attraction: The role of perceived similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 112–119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenblatt, A., & Greenberg, J. (1991). Examining the world of the depressed: Do depressed people prefer others who are depressed?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 620–629CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savin-Williams, R. C. (1979). Dominance hierarchies in groups of early adolescents. Child Development, 50, 923–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, K. R. (1997). The role of culture in emotion-antecedent appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 902–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper
Sulloway, F. J. (1996). Born to rebel: Birth order, family dynamics, and creative lives. New York: Pantheon Books
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley
Thompson, L., & Fine, G. A. (1999). Socially shared cognition, affect, and behavior: A review and integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 278–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 86–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiedens, L. Z., Ellsworth, P. C., & Mesquita, B. (2000). Stereotypes about sentiments and status: Emotional expectations for high- and low-status group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 560–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kelsey, R. M., & Leitten, C. L. (1993). Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 248–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenzlaff, R. M., & Prohaska, M. L. (1989). When misery prefers company: Depression, attributions, and responses to others' moods. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 220–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahn-Waxler, C., Cummings, E. M., McKnew, D. H., & Radke-Yarrow, M. (1984). Altruism, aggression and social interactions in young children with a manic-depressive parent. Child Development, 55, 112–122CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×