Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:57:41.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false


Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2022

Jeffrey M. Kaplow
College of William and Mary, Virginia
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Signing Away the Bomb
The Surprising Success of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime
, pp. 226 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54 (3): 421456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acharya, Avidit, Blackwell, Matthew, and Sen, Maya. 2016. Explaining Causal Findings without Bias: Detecting and Assessing Direct Effects. American Political Science Review 110 (3): 512529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akita, Hiroyuki. 2020. Trump Demands Japan and South Korea Pay for Nuclear Umbrella. Nikkei Asia.Google Scholar
Albright, David, and Stricker, Andrea. 2018. Taiwan’s Former Nuclear Weapons Program: Nuclear Weapons On-Demand. Institute for Science and International Security.Google Scholar
Albright, David, and Gay, Corey. 1998. Taiwan: Nuclear Nightmare Averted. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 54 (1): 5460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albright, David, and Brannan, Paul. 2009. IAEA Report on Syria. Institute for Science and International Security.Google Scholar
Albright, David, and Brannan, Paul. 2010. Satellite Image Shows Syrian Site Functionally Related to Al Kibar Reactor. Institute for Science and International Security.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham. 2010. Nuclear Disorder: Surveying Atomic Threats. Foreign Affairs 89 (1): 7485.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amano, Yukiya. 2017. Introductory Statement to the Board of Governors. International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D. 2014. The Perils of Peer Effects. Labour Economics 30: 98108.Google Scholar
Anstey, Isabelle. 2018. Negotiating Nuclear Control: The Zangger Committee and the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group in the 1970s. The International History Review 40 (5): 975995.Google Scholar
Arlot, Sylvain, and Celisse, Alain. 2010. A Survey of Cross-Validation Procedures for Model Selection. Statistics Surveys 4: 4079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asahi Shimbun. 2003. Nuclear Research Report <Summary>. February 20..+February+20.>Google Scholar
Asculai, Ephraim. 2004. Rethinking the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime. Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Australian Senate. 2000. Select Committee for an Inquiry into the Contract for a New Reactor at Lucas Heights.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert M. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert M., and Dion, Douglas. 1988. The Further Evolution of Cooperation. Science 242 (4884): 13851390.Google Scholar
Bailey, Michael A., Strezhnev, Anton, and Voeten, Erik. 2017. Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (2): 430456.Google Scholar
Ban, Ki-moon. 2004. Statement at the 59th Session of the United Nations General Assembly. Permanent Mission of the Republic of Korea to the United Nations.Google Scholar
Barkenbus, Jack N. 1980. Whither the Treaty? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 36 (4): 3739.Google Scholar
Barnaby, Frank. 1980. The NPT Review Conference – Much Talk, Few Results. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 30: 78.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, Martha. 1999. The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization 53 (4): 699732.Google Scholar
Barnum, Miriam, and Lo, James. 2020. Is the NPT Unraveling? Evidence from Text Analysis of Review Conference Statements. Journal of Peace Research 57 (6): 740751.Google Scholar
Barrett, Scott. 1999. A Theory of Full International Cooperation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 11 (4): 519541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barretto, Paulo M. C., and Cetto, Ana María. 2005. IAEA Technical Cooperation & the NPT. IAEA Bulletin 46 (2): 2830.Google Scholar
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 1986a. Arms Sales to Taiwan “Outrageous Interference in China’s Affairs.” April 2.Google Scholar
BBC Summary of World Broadcasts. 1986b. Defence Ministry Denies Developing Nuclear Weapons. March 17.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2000. Improving Quantitative Studies of International Conflict: A Conjecture. American Political Science Review 94 (1): 2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2011. Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series–Cross-Section Political Economy Data. Annual Review of Political Science 14 (1): 331352.Google Scholar
Becker-Jakob, Una, Hofmann, Gregor, Müller, Harald, and Wunderlich, Carmen. 2013. Good International Citizens: Canada, Germany, and Sweden. In Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control Interests, Conflicts, and Justice, edited by Müller, Harald and Wunderlich, Carmen. University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Mark S. 2016. Examining Explanations for Nuclear Proliferation. International Studies Quarterly 60 (3): 520529.Google Scholar
Bell, Mark S. 2021. Nuclear Reactions: How Nuclear-Armed States Behave. Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellemare, Marc F., Masaki, Takaaki, and Pepinsky, Thomas B.. 2017. Lagged Explanatory Variables and the Estimation of Causal Effect. The Journal of Politics 79 (3): 949963.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Milton R. 1978. Taiwan’s Nuclear Plans Concern U.S. Officials. Washington Post, December 20.Google Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas, Kalbhenn, Anna, Koubi, Vally, and Spilker, Gabriele. 2013. Is There a “Depth versus Participation” Dilemma in International Cooperation? The Review of International Organizations 8 (4): 477497.Google Scholar
Berry, William D., DeMeritt, Jacqueline H. R., and Esarey, Justin. 2010. Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models: Is a Product Term Essential? American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 248266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, Richard K. 2000. Universal Deterrence or Conceptual Collapse? Liberal Pessimism and Utopian Realism. In The Coming Crisis: Nuclear Proliferation, US Interests, and World Order, edited by Utgoff, Victor A., 5186. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bleek, Philipp C. 2010. Does Proliferation Beget Proliferation? Why Nuclear Dominoes Rarely Fall. Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Bleek, Philipp C. 2017. When Did (and Didn’t) States Proliferate? Chronicling the Spread of Nuclear Weapons. Project on Managing the Atom, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.Google Scholar
Bleek, Philipp C., and Lorber, Eric B.. 2014. Security Guarantees and Allied Nuclear Proliferation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (3): 429454.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Lincoln P. 1975. Nuclear Spread and World Order. Foreign Affairs 53 (4): 743755.Google Scholar
Bosch, Olivia, and van Ham, Peter. 2007. Global Non-Proliferation and Counter-Terrorism: The Impact of UNSCR 1540. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14 (1): 6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branigin, William. 1979. Iran Set to Scrap $34 Billion Worth of Civilian Projects. Washington Post, May 30.Google Scholar
Braut-Hegghammer, Målfrid. 2011. Revisiting Osirak: Preventive Attacks and Nuclear Proliferation Risks. International Security 36 (1): 101132.Google Scholar
Braut-Hegghammer, Målfrid. 2016. Unclear Physics: Why Iraq and Libya Failed to Build Nuclear Weapons. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, Eric. 2020. Will U.S. Sanctions Snapback Force Iran Out of the NPT? CSIS Commentary.Google Scholar
Brookings Institution. 2020. Experts Assess the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, 50 Years After it Went into Effect. Order From Chaos.Google Scholar
Brown, Robert L. 2015. Nuclear Authority: The IAEA and the Absolute Weapon. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Robert L., and Kaplow, Jeffrey M.. 2014. Talking Peace, Making Weapons: IAEA Technical Cooperation and Nuclear Proliferation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (3): 402428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Walton L. 1994. Presidential Leadership and U.S. Nonproliferation Policy. Presidential Studies Quarterly 24 (3): 563575.Google Scholar
Buchan, Alastair, ed. 1966. A World of Nuclear Powers? Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Budjeryn, Mariana. 2015. The Power of the NPT: International Norms and Ukraine’s Nuclear Disarmament. The Nonproliferation Review 22 (2): 203237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bühlmann, Christian. 2007. Le Développement de l’Arme Atomique en Suisse: Bref Tour d’Horizon. Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1975. Rethinking Non-Proliferation. International Affairs 51 (2): 175189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 1969. NPT: Movement toward a Viable World. 25 (4): 48.Google Scholar
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 2002. The History of the Bulletin Clock. 58 (2): 3637.Google Scholar
Bunn, George. 1994. Viewpoint: The NPT and Options for Its Extension in 1995. The Nonproliferation Review 1 (2): 5260.Google Scholar
Bunn, George, and Van Doren, Charles N.. 1991. Options for Extension of the NPT: The Intention of the Drafters of Article X.2. In Options & Opportunities: The NPT Extension Conference of 1995, edited by Bunn, George, Van Doren, Charles N., and Fischer, David. Programme for Promoting Nuclear Non-Proliferation.Google Scholar
Burr, William. 2007. U.S. Opposed Taiwanese Bomb during 1970s. Briefing Book 221. National Security Archive.Google Scholar
Burr, William. 2014. A Scheme of “Control”: The United States and the Origins of the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group, 1974–1976. The International History Review 36 (2): 252276.Google Scholar
Burr, William. 2017. The United States and South Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Program, 1974–1976, Part I. Briefing Book 582. National Security Archive.Google Scholar
Burr, William. 2019. Taiwan’s Nuclear Weapons Research and Development, 1966–1988. Briefing Book 656. National Security Archive.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. 2007. Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade. International Organization 61 (04): 735761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, George W. 2004. State of the Union 2004. The White House.Google Scholar
Byers, Michael. 2004. Policing the High Seas: The Proliferation Security Initiative. American Journal of International Law 98 (3): 526545.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. Colin, Gelbach, Jonah B., and Miller, Douglas L.. 2008. Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors. Review of Economics and Statistics 90 (3): 414427.Google Scholar
Cameron, James, and Rabinowitz, Or. 2017. Eight Lost Years? Nixon, Ford, Kissinger and the Non-Proliferation Regime, 1969–1977. Journal of Strategic Studies 40 (6): 839866.Google Scholar
Campbell, Kurt M., and Sunohara, Tsuyoshi. 2004. Japan: Thinking the Unthinkable. In The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices, edited by Campbell, Kurt M., Einhorn, Robert J., and Reiss, Mitchell. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Carcelli, Shannon, Gartzke, Erik, Gibbons, Rebecca Davis, and Kaplow, Jeffrey M.. 2014. The Nuclear Regime Complex: A New Dataset. Paper prepared for the 2014 International Studies Association Annual Convention, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Carlson, John. 2009. Defining Noncompliance: NPT Safeguards Agreements. Arms Control Today 39 (4): 2227.Google Scholar
Carlson, John, Bragin, Victor, Bardsley, John, and Hill, John. 1999. Nuclear Safeguards as an Evolutionary System. The Nonproliferation Review 6 (2): 109117.Google Scholar
Carnahan, Burrus M. 1987. Treaty Review Conferences. The American Journal of International Law 81 (1): 226230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carranza, Mario E. 2006. Can the NPT Survive? The Theory and Practice of US Nuclear Non-Proliferation Policy after September 11. Contemporary Security Policy 27 (3): 489525.Google Scholar
Carranza, Mario E. 2019. The Stability of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Norm: A Critique of Norm-Contestation Theory. The Nonproliferation Review 26 (1–2): 722.Google Scholar
Carter, Ashton B. 2006. America’s New Strategic Partner? Foreign Affairs 85 (4): 33.Google Scholar
Carter, David B., and Signorino, Curtis S.. 2010. Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data. Political Analysis 18 (3): 271292.Google Scholar
Chanlett-Avery, Emma, and Nikitin, Mary Beth. 2009. Japan’s Nuclear Future: Policy Debate, Prospects, and U.S. Interests. Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Charbonneau, Louis. 2004. Some in U.S. Think Syria Has Atomic Centrifuges – Sources. Reuters, May 5.Google Scholar
Chauvistré, Eric. 1992. The Implications of IAEA Inspections under Security Council Resolution 687. United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research.Google Scholar
Chitumbo, K., Robb, S., and Hilliard, J.. 2002. Use of Commercial Satellite Imagery in Strengthening IAEA Safeguards. In Commercial Satellite Imagery: A Tactic in Nuclear Weapon Deterrence, edited by Jasani, Bhupendra and Stein, Gotthard, 2348. Praxis Publishing.Google Scholar
Chuen, Cristina. 2005. The G8 Global Partnership. The Nonproliferation Review 12 (1): 71106.Google Scholar
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review 98 (2): 355370.Google Scholar
Cochran, Thomas B. 2008. Adequacy of IAEA’s Safeguards for Achieving Timely Detection. In Falling Behind: International Scrutiny of the Peaceful Atom, edited by Henry, D. Sokolski. Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Coe, Andrew J., and Vaynman, Jane. 2015. Collusion and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. The Journal of Politics 77 (4): 983997.Google Scholar
Coffey, Joseph I. 1971. Nuclear Guarantees and Nonproliferation. International Organization 25 (4): 836844.Google Scholar
Cohen, Avner. 1998. Israel and the Bomb. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Colgan, Jeff D., Keohane, Robert O., and Van de Graaf, Thijs. 2012. Punctuated Equilibrium in the Energy Regime Complex. The Review of International Organizations 7 (2): 117143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Scott J., Hays, Jude C., and Franzese, Robert J.. 2020. Fixed Effects in Rare Events Data: A Penalized Maximum Likelihood Solution. Political Science Research and Methods 8 (1): 92105.Google Scholar
Correlates of War Project. 2017. State System Membership List, v2016.Google Scholar
Cortell, Andrew P., and Davis, James W.. 1996. How Do International Institutions Matter? The Domestic Impact of International Rules and Norms. International Studies Quarterly 40 (4): 451478.Google Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan. 2002. Information Systems in Treaty Regimes. World Politics 54 (4): 405436.Google Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan. 2005. Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism. International Organization 59 (2): 363398.Google Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan. 2007. International Institutions and National Policies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, Kelsey, and Parker, Jenna. 2019. The Nuclear Security Summit Process and Its Outcomes. In Nuclear Safeguards, Security, and Nonproliferation, edited by Doyle, James E., 319355. 2nd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Christina L. 2009. Overlapping Institutions in Trade Policy. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 2531.Google Scholar
Day Jr., Samuel H. 1975. The Drift Becomes a Rush. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 31 (7): 67.Google Scholar
Debs, Alexandre, and Monteiro, Nuno P.. 2017. Nuclear Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Der Spiegel. 1988. Arbeiten die Jugoslawen an der Atombombe?, January 25.Google Scholar
Deutch, John, Kanter, Arnold, Moniz, Ernest, and Poneman, Daniel. 2004. Making the World Safe for Nuclear Energy. Survival 46 (4): 6579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanapala, Jayantha. 2010. Evaluating the 2010 NPT Review Conference. United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Dhanapala, Jayantha, and Duarte, Sergio. 2015. Is There a Future for the NPT? Arms Control Today 45 (6): 810.Google Scholar
Diekmann, Andreas. 1985. Volunteer’s Dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution 29 (4): 605610.Google Scholar
Donno, Daniela. 2010. Who Is Punished? Regional Intergovernmental Organizations and the Enforcement of Democratic Norms. International Organization 64 (4): 593625.Google Scholar
Donno, Daniela. 2013. Defending Democratic Norms: International Actors and the Politics of Electoral Misconduct. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donohue, David. 1998. Strengthening IAEA Safeguards Through Environmental Sampling and Analysis. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 271–273: 1118.Google Scholar
Donohue, David, Deron, Stein, and Kuhn, Erwin. 1994. Environmental Monitoring and Safeguards: Reinforcing Analytical Capabilities. IAEA Bulletin 36 (3): 2023.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation? International Organization 50 (3): 379406.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1998. Managing the Evolution of Multilateralism. International Organization 52 (2): 397419.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2003. The Hidden Hand of Economic Coercion. International Organization 57 (3): 643659.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2009. The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 6570.Google Scholar
Duffield, John S. 2008. International Security Institutions: Rules, Tools, Schools, or Fools? In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, eds. Rockman, Bert A., Binder, Sarah A., and Rhodes, R. A. W.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dujarric, Stéphane. 2020. Statement Attributable to the Spokesman of the Secretary-General – on the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Entry-into-Force of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. United Nations.Google Scholar
Dunn, Lewis A. 1982. Controlling the Bomb: Nuclear Proliferation in the 1980s. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, Lewis A. 1985. Standing Up for the NPT. Arms Control Today 15 (8): 67.Google Scholar
Dunn, Lewis A. 1986. Building on Success: The NPT at Fifteen. Survival 28 (3): 221233.Google Scholar
Dunn, Lewis A. 2012. Leveraging Proliferation Shocks. In Over the Horizon Proliferation Threats, edited by Wirtz, James J. and Lavoy, Peter R.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, Lewis A. 2017. How the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Could Dramatically Erode – and Why the United States and Russia Should Cooperate to Prevent That Outcome, and How. US-Russian Working Group on the NPT Review Process.Google Scholar
Dunn, Lewis A., and Kahn, Herman. 1976. Trends in Nuclear Proliferation, 1975–1995: Projections, Problems, and Policy Options. Hudson Institute.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim. 2008. Good Citizen Europe. International Affairs 84 (1): 1328.Google Scholar
Early, Bryan R., Nance, Mark T., and Patrick Cottrell, M.. 2017. Global Governance at the Energy-Security Nexus: Lessons from UNSCR 1540. Energy Research & Social Science 24: 94101.Google Scholar
Early, Bryan R., and Spice, Robert. 2015. Economic Sanctions, International Institutions, and Sanctions Busters: When Does Institutionalized Cooperation Help Sanctioning Efforts? Foreign Policy Analysis 11 (3): 339360.Google Scholar
Einhorn, Robert J. 2016. The NPT Review Process: The Need for a More Productive Approach. Arms Control Today 46 (7): 1519.Google Scholar
Endicott, John E. 1977. The 1975–1976 Debate over Ratification of the NPT in Japan. Asian Survey 17 (3): 275292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, William. 1975. Failure at the NPT Review Conference. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 31 (7): 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Jennifer. L, and Way, Christopher. 2011. Membership Has Its Privileges: Conventional Arms and Influence within the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. In Causes and Consequences of Nuclear Proliferation, edited by Rauchhaus, Robert, Kroenig, Matthew, and Gartzke, Erik, 3260. Routledge.Google Scholar
Esfandiary, Dina, and Tabatabai, Ariane. 2014. Meeting Iran’s Nuclear Fuel Supply Needs. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.Google Scholar
EU Council Secretariat. 2003. Basic Principles for an EU Strategy against Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Council of the European Union.Google Scholar
Fahmy, Nabil. 2006. An Assessment of International Nuclear Nonproliferation Efforts after 60 Years. The Nonproliferation Review 13 (1): 8187.Google Scholar
Falk, Armin, and Fischbacher, Urs. 2006. A Theory of Reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior 54 (2): 293315.Google Scholar
Fariss, Christopher J. 2014. Respect for Human Rights Has Improved over Time: Modeling the Changing Standard of Accountability. American Political Science Review 108 (2): 297318.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1998. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52 (2): 269305.Google Scholar
Feaver, Peter D., and Niou, Emerson M. S.. 1996. Managing Nuclear Proliferation: Condemn, Strike, or Assist? International Studies Quarterly 40 (2): 209233.Google Scholar
Feld, Bernard T. 1968. After the Nonproliferation Treaty—What Next? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 24 (7): 23.Google Scholar
Feld, Bernard T. 1975. The Charade of Piecemeal Arms Limitation. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 31 (1): 8.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Marta. 2016. IAEA LEU Bank: New Agreement Opens the Way for Construction of Storage Facility. International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Fields, Jeffrey, and Enia, Jason S.. 2009. The Health of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. The Nonproliferation Review 16 (2): 173196.Google Scholar
Findlay, Trevor. 2007. Looking Back: The Additional Protocol. Arms Control Today 37 (9): 4751.Google Scholar
Findlay, Trevor. 2015. Proliferation Alert! The IAEA and Non-Compliance Reporting. Project on Managing the Atom, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.Google Scholar
Firth, David. 1993. Bias Reduction of Maximum Likelihood Estimates. Biometrika 80 (1): 2738.Google Scholar
Fischer, David. 1997. History of the International Atomic Energy Agency: The First Forty Years. International Atomic Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Mark. 2007. Nuclear Black Markets: Pakistan, A.Q. Khan and the Rise of Proliferation Networks. International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Mark. 2008. US–India Nuclear Cooperation Accord: Implications for the Non-proliferation Regime. Asia-Pacific Review 15 (1): 7685.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Mark. 2016. Asia’s Latent Nuclear Powers: Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Adelphi 455. International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Mark. 2019. How Japan Could Go Nuclear. Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
Ford, Christopher A. 2007. Debating Disarmament: Interpreting Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The Nonproliferation Review 14 (3): 401428.Google Scholar
Ford, Christopher A. 2009a. Nuclear Disarmament, Nonproliferation, and the Credibility Thesis. Hudson Institute.Google Scholar
Ford, Christopher A. 2009b. Nuclear Technology Rights and Wrongs: The NPT, Article IV, and Nonproliferation. Hudson Institute.Google Scholar
Frantz, Douglas. 2004. Nuclear Ring May Have Aided Syria. Los Angeles Times, June 25.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Matthew. 2009a. Spreading Temptation: Proliferation and Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation Agreements. International Security 34 (1): 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, Matthew. 2009b. Taking a Walk on the Supply Side: The Determinants of Civilian Nuclear Cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (2): 181208.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Matthew. 2012. Atomic Assistance: How “Atoms for Peace” Programs Cause Nuclear Insecurity. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Matthew, and Tkach, Benjamin. 2015. Almost Nuclear: Introducing the Nuclear Latency Dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science 32 (4): 443461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, Matthew, and Berejikian, Jeffrey D.. 2012. Disaggregating Noncompliance: Abstention versus Predation in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (3): 355381.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Matthew, Kroenig, Matthew, and Sechser, Todd S.. 2014. The Case for Using Statistics to Study Nuclear Security. H-Diplo/ISSF Forum (2): 3754.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Matthew, and Kreps, Sarah E.. 2010. Targeting Nuclear Programs in War and Peace: A Quantitative Empirical Analysis, 1941-2000. Journal of Conflict Resolution 54 (6): 831859.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Matthew, and Lupu, Yonatan. 2016. Do Arms Control Treaties Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. International Studies Quarterly 60 (3): 530539.Google Scholar
Furukawa, Katsuhisa. 2003. Nuclear Option, Arms Control, and Extended Deterrence: In Search of a New Framework for Japan’s Nuclear Policy. In Japan’s Nuclear Option: Security, Politics, and Policy in the 21st Century, edited by Thompson, Jeffrey W. and Self, Benjamin, 95147. Stimson Center.Google Scholar
Furukawa, Katsuhisa. 2010. Japan’s Policy and Views on Nuclear Weapon: A Historical Perspective. Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics, & Strategic Studies 37: 130.Google Scholar
Furukawa, Katsuhisa. 2012. Japan’s Nuclear Option. In Over the Horizon Proliferation Threats, edited by Wirtz, James J. and Lavoy, Peter R., 1332. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallini, Linda. 2007. Foreign Affairs Oral History: Linda Gallini. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training.Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik. 2014. An Apology for Numbers in the Study of National Security…If an Apology Is Really Necessary. H-Diplo/ISSF Forum (2): 7790.Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik, and Kroenig, Matthew. 2009. A Strategic Approach to Nuclear Proliferation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (2): 151160.Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik, and Kroenig, Matthew. 2017. Social Scientific Analysis of Nuclear Weapons: Past Scholarly Successes, Contemporary Challenges, and Future Research Opportunities. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (9): 18531874.Google Scholar
Gavin, Francis J. 2012. Nuclear Statecraft: History and Strategy in America’s Atomic Age. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gavin, Francis J. 2014. What We Talk about When We Talk about Nuclear Weapons: A Review Essay. H-Diplo/ISSF Forum (2): 1136.Google Scholar
Gavin, Francis J. 2015. Strategies of Inhibition: U.S. Grand Strategy, the Nuclear Revolution, and Nonproliferation. International Security 40 (1): 946.Google Scholar
Gavin, Francis J. 2020. Nuclear Weapons and American Grand Strategy. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Gelb, Leslie H. 1975. Arms Expert Warns on Nuclear Spread. The New York Times, April 10.Google Scholar
Gerzhoy, Gene. 2015. Alliance Coercion and Nuclear Restraint: How the United States Thwarted West Germany’s Nuclear Ambitions. International Security 39 (4): 91129.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Rebecca Davis. 2018. The Humanitarian Turn in Nuclear Disarmament and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The Nonproliferation Review 25 (1–2): 1136.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Rebecca Davis. 2019a. Addressing the Nuclear Ban Treaty. Washington Quarterly 42 (1): 2740.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Rebecca Davis. 2019b. Can This New Approach to Nuclear Disarmament Work? War on the Rocks.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Rebecca Davis. 2019c. The Future of the Nuclear Order. Arms Control Today.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Rebecca Davis. 2020. Supply to Deny: The Benefits of Nuclear Assistance for Nuclear Nonproliferation. Journal of Global Security Studies 5 (2): 282298.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Rebecca Davis. 2022. The Hegemon’s Toolkit: US Leadership and the Politics of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Jeff. 2007. Bayesian Methods: A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach. 2nd ed. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Gillette, Robert. 1978. U.S. Squelched Apparent S. Korea A-Bomb Drive. Los Angeles Times, November 4.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Michael J. 2004. Is There a Broader-Deeper Trade-off in International Multilateral Agreements? International Organization 58 (3): 459484.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2002. Expanded Trade and GDP Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (5): 712724.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Wallensteen, Peter, Eriksson, Mikael, Sollenberg, Margareta, and Strand, Håvard. 2002. Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research 39 (5): 615637.Google Scholar
Global Affairs Canada. 2020. Minister of Foreign Affairs Marks 50th Anniversary of Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.Google Scholar
Globe and Mail. 1987. Ottawa Signs A-pact with Swiss. December 23.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, Diehl, Paul Francis, and Balas, Alexandru. 2016. The Puzzle of Peace: The Evolution of Peace in the International System. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldblat, Jozef. 1986. Will the NPT Survive? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 42 (1): 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldblat, Jozef. 1997. Nuclear‐Weapon‐Free Zones: A History and Assessment. The Nonproliferation Review 4 (3): 1832.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, Pierre. 2001. Strengthened Safeguards: Meeting Present and Future Challenges. IAEA Bulletin 43 (4): 611.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, Pierre. 2006. The Urgent Need to Strengthen the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, Pierre. 2009. Exposing Nuclear Non-compliance. Survival 51 (1): 143164.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, Pierre. 2010. Safeguards Noncompliance: A Challenge for the IAEA and the UN Security Council. Arms Control Today 40 (1): 2227.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, Pierre. 2020. Dealing Preventively with NPT Withdrawal. Nonproliferation Policy Education Center.Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael R. 1985. North Korea Joins Pact to Prevent the Spread of Nuclear Weapons. The New York Times, December 27.Google Scholar
Grand, Camille. 2010. The Non-Proliferation Treaty in an Era of Proliferation Crises. In Nuclear Weapons after the 2010 NPT Review Conference, edited by Zanders, Jean Pascal, 1326. European Union Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1978. Threshold Models of Collective Behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83 (6): 14201443.Google Scholar
Gray, Julia. 2018. Life, Death, or Zombie? The Vitality of International Organizations. International Studies Quarterly 62 (1): 113.Google Scholar
Green, Michael J. 1995. Arming Japan: Defense Production, Alliance Politics, and the Postwar Search for Autonomy. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Michael J., and Furukawa, Katsuhisa. 2000. New Ambitions, Old Obstacles: Japan and Its Search for an Arms Control Strategy. Arms Control Today 30 (6): 1724.Google Scholar
Green, Michael J., and Furukawa, Katsuhisa. 2008. Japan: New Nuclear Realism. In The Long Shadow: Nuclear Weapons and Security in 21st Century Asia, edited by Alagappa, Muthiah, 347372. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gruemm, H. 1983. Safeguards Verification – Its Credibility and the Diversion Hypothesis. IAEA Bulletin 25 (4): 2729.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T. 2002. A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law. California Law Review 90 (6): 1823.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2009. The Power Politics of Regime Complexity: Human Rights Trade Conditionality in Europe. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 3337.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Noland, Marcus. 2012. Engaging North Korea: The Efficacy of Sanctions and Inducements. In Sanctions, Statecraft, and Nuclear Proliferation, edited by Solingen, Etel, 232260. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Noland, Marcus. 2017. Hard Target: Sanctions, Inducements, and the Case of North Korea. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hajnoczi, Thomas. 2020. The Relationship between the NPT and the TPNW. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 3 (1): 8791.Google Scholar
Halsted, Thomas A. 1975. The Spread of Nuclear Weapons – Is the Dam about to Burst? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 31 (5): 8.Google Scholar
Harrison, Selig S. 1996. Japan and Nuclear Weapons. In Japan’s Nuclear Future: The Plutonium Debate and East Asian Security, edited by Harrison, Selig S., 344. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
He, Haibo, and Garcia, E. A.. 2009. Learning from Imbalanced Data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 21 (9): 12631284.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Mark. 2008. IAEA Chief, West Clash over Nuclear Aid for Syria. Reuters, November 24.Google Scholar
Heinze, Georg, and Schemper, Michael. 2002. A Solution to the Problem of Separation in Logistic Regression. Statistics in Medicine 21 (16): 24092419.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 1999. Forum Shopping for Human Rights. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148 (2): 285400.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Mark. 2004. ROK claimed IAEA Knew of U Work, Pressed for no IAEA Board Report. Nucleonics Week, September 23.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Mark. 2011. New Global Rules for Sensitive Nuclear Trade. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Mark. 2016. Toward a Nuclear Suppliers Group Policy for States Not Party to the NPT. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Mark. 2017. Eyes on the Prize: India’s Pursuit of Membership in the Nuclear Suppliers Group. The Nonproliferation Review 24 (3–4): 275296.Google Scholar
Hibbs, Mark. 2018. Safeguards for Saudi Arabia. Arms Control Wonk.Google Scholar
Hill, Steven. 2021. NATO and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Chatham House.Google Scholar
Hirdman, Sven, Barnaby, Frank, and Goldblat, Jozef. 1972. The Near-Nuclear Countries and the NPT. Almqwist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Theodore. 2004. The IAEA Additional Protocol: What It Is and Why It Matters. The Nonproliferation Review 11 (3): 140166.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Stephanie C. 2009. Overlapping Institutions in the Realm of International Security: The Case of NATO and ESDP. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 4552.Google Scholar
Horovitz, Liviu. 2015. Beyond Pessimism: Why the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Will Not Collapse. Journal of Strategic Studies 38 (1–2): 126158.Google Scholar
Huddle, Jr., “Pancho.”, Franklin Pierce 2015. Foreign Affairs Oral History: Ambassador Franklin Pierce “Pancho” Huddle, Jr. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Schott, Jeffrey J., Elliott, Kimberly Ann, and Oegg, Barbara. 2007. Economic Sanctions Reconsidered. 3rd ed. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hug, Simon, and Lukács, Richard. 2014. Preferences or Blocs? Voting in the United Nations Human Rights Council. The Review of International Organizations 9 (1): 83106.Google Scholar
Hughes, Llewelyn. 2007. Why Japan Will Not Go Nuclear (Yet): International and Domestic Constraints on the Nuclearization of Japan. International Security 31 (4): 6796.Google Scholar
Hunt, Constance D. 1977. Canadian Policy and the Export of Nuclear Energy. The University of Toronto Law Journal 27 (1): 69104.Google Scholar
Huntley, Wade L. 2006. Rebels without a Cause: North Korea, Iran and the NPT. International Affairs 82 (4): 723742.Google Scholar
Huntley, Wade L. 2007. U.S. Policy toward North Korea in Strategic Context: Tempting Goliath’s Fate. Asian Survey 47 (3): 455480.Google Scholar
Hyde, Alan. 2009. The International Labor Organization in the Stag Hunt for Global Labor Rights. Law & Ethics of Human Rights 3 (2): 154179.Google Scholar
Hymans, Jacques E. C. 2006. The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation: Identity, Emotions, and Foreign Policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hymans, Jacques E. C. 2010. The Study of Nuclear Proliferation and Nonproliferation: Toward a New Consensus? In Forecasting Nuclear Proliferation in the 21st Century, edited by Potter, William C. and Mukhatzhanova, Gaukar, 1:1337. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hymans, Jacques E. C. 2012. Achieving Nuclear Ambitions: Scientists, Politicians, and Proliferation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. 2005a. Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran. GOV/2005/77, Board of Governors Resolution.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. 2005b. Strengthening the Effectiveness and Improving the Efficiency of the Safeguards System Including Implementation of Additional Protocols. GC(49)/9, Report to the IAEA General Conference.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. 2007. Cooperation between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Agency in the light of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1737 (2006). GOV/2007/7, Report by the Director General.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. 2008. Communication dated 10 September 2008 received from the Permanent Mission of Germany to the Agency regarding a ‘Statement on Civil Nuclear Cooperation with India’. INFCIRC/734 (Corrected).Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency. 2021. Status of the Additional Protocol.Google Scholar
International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. 2021. Signature and Ratification Status.Google Scholar
Iwama, Yoko. 2018. The Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Decision to Join the Non-Proliferation Treaty. In Joining the Non-Proliferation Treaty, edited by Baylis, John and Iwama, Yoko, 151171. Routledge.Google Scholar
Japan Economic Newswire. 1985. N. Korea Building Nuclear Reactor, ABC Says. June 7.Google Scholar
Jargalsaikhan, Enkhsaikhan. 2005. Mongolia: A Model for an Innovative Approach to Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones. The Nonproliferation Review 12 (1): 153162.Google Scholar
Jasper, Ursula. 2012. The Ambivalent Neutral. The Nonproliferation Review 19 (2): 267292.Google Scholar
Jensen, Lloyd. 1974. Return from the Nuclear Brink: National Interest and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1982. Security Regimes. International Organization 36 (2): 357378.Google Scholar
Jo, Dong-Joon, and Gartzke, Erik. 2007. Determinants of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (1): 167194.Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebecca. 2005. Politics and Protection: Why the 2005 NPT Review Conference Failed. Disarmament Diplomacy (80): 332.Google Scholar
Jones, Scott A. 2016. The Multilateral Export Control Regimes: Informality Begets Collaboration. In International Cooperation on WMD Nonproliferation, edited by Knopf, Jeffrey W., 2345. University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Jonter, Thomas. 2016. The Key to Nuclear Restraint: The Swedish Plans to Acquire Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Joseph, Robert G. 2005. (U.S. Senate) Hearing on U.S.-India Civil Nuclear Cooperation Initiative. U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Joshi, Mahesh V. 2002. On Evaluating Performance of Classifiers for Rare Classes. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, 641–644.Google Scholar
Joyner, Daniel H. 2011. Interpreting the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1992. Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers. International Organization 46 (3): 681708.Google Scholar
Kang, Jungmin, Hayes, Peter, Bin, Li, Suzuki, Tatsujiro, and Tanter, Richard. 2005. South Korea’s Nuclear Surprise. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 61 (1): 4049.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Jeffrey M. 2015. The Canary in the Nuclear Submarine: Assessing the Nonproliferation Risk of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Loophole. The Nonproliferation Review 22 (2): 185202.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Jeffrey M. 2016. The Negotiation Calculus: Why Parties to Civil Conflict Refuse to Talk. International Studies Quarterly 60 (1): 3846.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Jeffrey M. 2020. All the World’s Nuclear Reactors. Dataset.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Jeffrey M., and Gibbons, Rebecca Davis. 2015. The Days after a Deal with Iran: Implications for the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Kapur, Ashok. 1977. Nth Powers of the Future. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 430: 8495.Google Scholar
Kapur, Ashok. 1980. The Nuclear Spread: A Third World View. Third World Quarterly 2 (1): 5975.Google Scholar
Kase, Yuri. 2001. The Costs and Benefits of Japan’s Nuclearization: An Insight into the 1968/70 Internal Report. The Nonproliferation Review 8 (2): 5568.Google Scholar
Kassenova, Togzhan. 2011. A “Black Hole” in the Global Nonproliferation Regime: The Case of Taiwan. NAPSNet Policy Forum 11-30.Google Scholar
Keeley, James F. 1993. The IAEA and the Iraqi Challenge: Roots and Responses. International Journal 49 (1): 126155.Google Scholar
Keeley, James F. 1998. Compliance and the Non-Proliferation Treaty: Developments in Safeguards and Supply Controls. In Treaty Compliance: Some Concerns and Remedies, edited by Canadian Council on International Law and The Markland Group. Brill Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2009. The More the Merrier? The Effects of Having Multiple International Election Monitoring Organizations. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 5964.Google Scholar
Kennedy, John F. 1963. News Conference 52. Presented at the U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. Reciprocity in International Relations. International Organization 40 (1): 127.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Victor, David G.. 2011. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 723.Google Scholar
Kerr, Paul. 2005a. IAEA Board Closes Safeguards Loophole. Arms Control Today 35 (9): 29.Google Scholar
Kerr, Paul. 2005b. IAEA Board Seeks Strengthened Safeguards. Arms Control Today 35 (6): 24.Google Scholar
Kerr, Paul. 2017. The JCPOA and Safeguards: Model or Outlier? The Nonproliferation Review 24 (3–4): 261273.Google Scholar
Kim, Youngse. 1996. Equilibrium Selection in n-Person Coordination Games. Games and Economic Behavior 15 (2): 203227.Google Scholar
Kimball, Daryl G. 2016. NSG Membership Proposal Would Undermine Nonproliferation. Arms Control Now.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation. American Political Science Review 95 (1): 4969.Google Scholar
King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2001. Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data. Political Analysis 9 (2): 137163.Google Scholar
King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2007. When Can History Be Our Guide? The Pitfalls of Counterfactual Inference. International Studies Quarterly 51 (1): 183210.Google Scholar
Kishi, Toshimitsu. 2018. Deliberations on Japanese Nuclear Policy During the Sato Administration: Studies by the Cabinet Research Office. National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Kittrie, Orde F. 2006. Averting Catastrophe: Why the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Is Losing Its Deterrence Capacity and How to Restore It. Michigan Journal of International Law 28: 337430.Google Scholar
Kmentt, Alexander. 2013. How Divergent Views on Nuclear Disarmament Threaten the NPT. Arms Control Today 43 (10): 813.Google Scholar
Knopf, Jeffrey W. 2012. Nuclear Disarmament and Nonproliferation: Examining the Linkage Argument. International Security 37 (3): 92132.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. 2001. Loosening the Ties That Bind: A Learning Model of Agreement Flexibility. International Organization 55 (2): 289325.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. 2013. The Continent of International Law. Journal of Conflict Resolution 57 (4): 653681.Google Scholar
Kotsiantis, Sotiris, Kanellopoulos, Dimitris, and Pintelas, Panayiotis. 2006. Handling Imbalanced Datasets: A Review. GESTS International Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering 30 (1): 2536.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1982. Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables. International Organization 36 (2): 185205.Google Scholar
Kroenig, Matthew. 2009a. Exporting the Bomb: Why States Provide Sensitive Nuclear Assistance. American Political Science Review 103 (1): 113133.Google Scholar
Kroenig, Matthew. 2009b. Importing the Bomb: Sensitive Nuclear Assistance and Nuclear Proliferation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (2): 161180.Google Scholar
Kroenig, Matthew. 2010. Exporting the Bomb: Technology Transfer and the Spread of Nuclear Weapons. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kroenig, Matthew. 2016. US Nuclear Weapons and Non-Proliferation: Is There a Link? Journal of Peace Research 53 (2): 166179.Google Scholar
Kroenig, Matthew, and Pavel, Barry. 2014. A Nuclear Deal with Iran: The Proliferation Challenge. The National Interest.Google Scholar
Kurosaki, Akira. 2017. Nuclear Energy and Nuclear-Weapon Potential: A Historical Analysis of Japan in the 1960s. The Nonproliferation Review 24 (1–2): 4765.Google Scholar
Kurosawa, Mitsuru. 2004. Moving beyond the Debate on a Nuclear Japan. The Nonproliferation Review 11 (3): 110137.Google Scholar
Kutchesfahani, Sara Z. 2019. Regional Initiatives toward a Nuclear Weapons Free World: The Case of Nuclear Weapons Free Zones. In Nuclear Safeguards, Security, and Nonproliferation, edited by Doyle, James E., 5976. 2nd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Kyl, Jon. 2000. Maintaining Peace through Strength: A Rejection of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. Harvard Journal on Legislation 37 (1): 325343.Google Scholar
Lake, David A., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2006. The Logic of Delegation to International Organizations. In Delegation and Agency in International Organizations, edited by Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A, Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J., 341368. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lanoszka, Alexander. 2018. Atomic Assurance: The Alliance Politics of Nuclear Proliferation. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Leah, Christine M. 2017. Unusual Suspects Down Under: Australia’s Choice of the Nonproliferation Treaty. In Negotiating the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: Origins of the Nuclear Order, edited by Popp, Roland, Horovitz, Liviu, and Wenger, Andreas, 119136. Routledge.Google Scholar
Leeds, Brett, Ritter, Jeffrey, Mitchell, Sara, and Long, Andrew. 2002. Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions, 1815–1944. International Interactions 28 (3): 237260.Google Scholar
Levite, Ariel E. 2003. Never Say Never Again: Nuclear Reversal Revisited. International Security 27 (3): 5988.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 2006. How Long for Japan to Build a Deterrent? Arms Control Wonk.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 2007. N Minus Six Months. Arms Control Wonk.Google Scholar
Lewis, Patricia M. 2013. A Middle East Free of Nuclear Weapons: Possible, Probable or Pipe-Dream? International Affairs 89 (2): 433450.Google Scholar
Lupu, Yonatan. 2013. Best Evidence: The Role of Information in Domestic Judicial Enforcement of International Human Rights Agreements. International Organization 67 (3): 469503.Google Scholar
Luque, Amalia, Carrasco, Alejandro, Martín, Alejandro, and Heras, Ana de las. 2019. The Impact of Class Imbalance in Classification Performance Metrics Based on the Binary Confusion Matrix. Pattern Recognition 91: 216231.Google Scholar
Mallard, Grégoire. 2014. Fallout: Nuclear Diplomacy in an Age of Global Fracture. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Peter Rosendorff, B.. 2002. Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements. International Organization 56 (3): 477513.Google Scholar
Manski, Charles F. 1993. Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem. The Review of Economic Studies 60 (3): 531542.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Jaggers, Keith, and Gurr, Ted Robert. 2010. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2010. Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis 10 (2): 134153.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 2005. The President and International Commitments: Treaties as Signaling Devices. Presidential Studies Quarterly 35 (3): 440465.Google Scholar
Marwah, Onkar. 1975. The NPT Review Conference. In Nuclear Proliferation and the Near-Nuclear Countries, edited by Marwah, Onkar and Shulz, Ann, 301313. Ballinger Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Mattiacci, Eleonora, Mehta, Rupal N., and Whitlark, Rachel Elizabeth. 2021. Atomic Ambiguity: Event Data Evidence on Nuclear Latency and International Cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 1994. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19 (3): 549.Google Scholar
Mehta, Rupal N. 2020. Delaying Doomsday: The Politics of Nuclear Reversal. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mehta, Rupal N., and Whitlark, Rachel Elizabeth. 2017. The Benefits and Burdens of Nuclear Latency. International Studies Quarterly 61 (3): 517528.Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul, and Sauer, Tom. 2018. The Nuclear Ban Treaty: A Sign of Global Impatience. Survival 60 (2): 6172.Google Scholar
Miller, Judith. 1981. Cranston Sees Iraq as Nuclear Power by ’82. The New York Times, March 18.Google Scholar
Miller, Judith. 1982. U.S. Walks Out as Atom Parley Bars the Israelis. The New York Times, September 25.Google Scholar
Miller, Nicholas L. 2014a. Nuclear Dominoes: A Self-Defeating Prophecy? Security Studies 23 (1): 3373.Google Scholar
Miller, Nicholas L. 2014b. The Secret Success of Nonproliferation Sanctions. International Organization 68 (4): 913944.Google Scholar
Miller, Nicholas L. 2018. Stopping the Bomb: The Sources and Effectiveness of US Nonproliferation Policy. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Steven E. 2012. Nuclear Collisions: Discord, Reform and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald B. 1994. Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance. International Organization 48 (3): 425458.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald B. 1998. Sources of Transparency: Information Systems in International Regimes. International Studies Quarterly 42 (1): 109130.Google Scholar
Mitra, Devirupa. 2016. Exclusive: India’s 300-page Application for NSG Membership. The Wire, July 1.Google Scholar
Mochizuki, Mike M. 2007. Japan Tests the Nuclear Taboo. The Nonproliferation Review 14 (2): 303328.Google Scholar
Molander, Per. 1992. The Prevalence of Free Riding. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (4): 756771.Google Scholar
Moltz, James Clay. 1998. Closing the NPT Loophole on Exports of Naval Propulsion Reactors. The Nonproliferation Review 6 (1): 108114.Google Scholar
Moltz, James Clay. 2006. Future Nuclear Proliferation Scenarios in Northeast Asia. The Nonproliferation Review 13 (3): 591604.Google Scholar
Monteiro, Nuno P., and Debs, Alexandre. 2014. The Strategic Logic of Nuclear Proliferation. International Security 39 (2): 751.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Alexander H. 2005. Ringing in Proliferation: How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb Network. International Security 30 (2): 153187.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Alexander H. 2013. Stop Helping Me: When Nuclear Assistance Impedes Nuclear Programs. In The Nuclear Renaissance and International Security, edited by Stulberg, Adam N. and Fuhrmann, Matthew, 177202. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Alexander H., and Mount, Adam. 2014. Misestimation: Explaining US Failures to Predict Nuclear Weapons Programs. Intelligence and National Security 29 (3): 357386.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Alexander H., and Sagan, Scott D.. 2009. The Perils of Predicting Proliferation. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (2): 302328.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. Clifton, Bapat, Navin A., and Kobayashi, Yoshi. 2014. The Threat and Imposition of Sanctions: Updating the TIES dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science 31 (5): 541558.Google Scholar
Morrow, Daniel, and Carriere, Michael. 1999. The Economic Impacts of the 1998 Sanctions on India and Pakistan. The Nonproliferation Review 6 (4): 116.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 2007. When Do States Follow the Laws of War? American Political Science Review 101 (3): 559572.Google Scholar
Möser, Robin. 2019. “The Major Prize”: Apartheid South Africa’s Accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, 1988–91. The Nonproliferation Review 26 (5–6): 559573.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald. 2005a. The 2005 NPT Review Conference: Reasons and Consequences of Failure and Options for Repair. Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald. 2005b. A Treaty in Troubled Waters: Reflections on the Failed NPT Review Conference. The International Spectator 40 (3): 3344.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald. 2010a. Between Power and Justice: Current Problems and Perspectives of the NPT Regime. Strategic Analysis 34 (2): 189201.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald. 2010b. The 2010 NPT Review Conference: Some Breathing Space Gained, but No Breakthrough. The International Spectator 45 (3): 518.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald, and Schmidt, Andreas. 2010. The Little-Known Story of Deproliferation: Why States Give up Nuclear Weapons Activities. In Forecasting Nuclear Proliferation in the 21st Century, edited by Potter, William C. and Mukhatzhanova, Gaukar, 1:124158. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Alva. 1976. The Game of Disarmament: How the United States and Russia Run the Arms Race. Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Nader, Alireza. 2012. Influencing Iran’s Decisions on the Nuclear Program. In Sanctions, Statecraft, and Nuclear Proliferation, edited by Solingen, Etel, 211231. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Narang, Vipin. 2014. The Use and Abuse of Large-n Methods in Nuclear Studies. H-Diplo/ISSF Forum (2): 9197.Google Scholar
Narang, Vipin. 2017. Strategies of Nuclear Proliferation: How States Pursue the Bomb. International Security 41 (3): 110150.Google Scholar
National Planning Association. 1958. 1970 without Arms Control: Implications of Modern Weapons Technology.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2012. The Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty: Technical Issues for the United States. The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Nayar, Ranvir. 2020. 50 Years of Failure: Anniversary of NPT Is Nothing to Celebrate. Arab News, March 13.Google Scholar
Nephew, Richard. 2017. The Art of Sanctions: A View from the Field. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Jenny, and Simpson, John. 2004. The NPT Withdrawal Clause and Its Negotiating History. Mountbatten Centre for International Studies.Google Scholar
North Atlantic Treaty Organization. 2020. North Atlantic Council Statement on the 50th Anniversary of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.Google Scholar
Nunn, Sam. 2014. Open a Nuclear Fuel Bank. The New York Times, July 11.Google Scholar
Nutt, Cullen G. 2019. Proof of the Bomb: The Influence of Previous Failure on Intelligence Judgments of Nuclear Programs. Security Studies 28 (2): 321359.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 1981. Maintaining a Nonproliferation Regime. International Organization 35 (1): 1538.Google Scholar
Obama, Barack. 2009. Remarks at Hradcany Square, Prague, Czech Republic. The White House.Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, Mervyn, and Walsh, Jamie. 2014. Ireland and the 1975 NPT Review Conference: Norm-Building and the Role of Small States. Irish Studies in International Affairs 25: 101116.Google Scholar
Office of the Director of National Intelligence. 2007. Iran: Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities. National Intelligence Estimate, Unclassified Key Judgments.Google Scholar
Office of the Director of National Intelligence. 2008. Background Briefing with Senior U.S. Officials on Syria’s Covert Nuclear Reactor and North Korea’s Involvement.Google Scholar
O’Mahoney, Joseph. 2020. The Smiling Buddha Effect: Canadian and US Policy after India’s 1974 Nuclear Test. The Nonproliferation Review 27 (1–3): 167179.Google Scholar
Onderco, Michal, and Nuti, Leopoldo. 2020. Extending the NPT – A Critical Oral History of the 1995 Review and Extension Conference. Wilson Center.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A. 1985. Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies. World Politics 38 (1): 124.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A. 1986. Cooperation under Anarchy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pabsch, Wiegand. 1975. The Non-Proliferation Treaty: Success or Failure? An Appraisal of the Review Conference. NATO Review 23 (4): 2427.Google Scholar
Pan, Esther. 2005. Nonproliferation: Proliferation Threats. Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V. 2000. Power versus Prudence: Why Nations Forgo Nuclear Weapons. McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V. 2003. Systemic Conditions and Security Cooperation: Explaining the Persistence of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 16 (1): 135.Google Scholar
Pellaud, Bruno. 2000. The Strengthened Safeguards System: Objectives, Challenges and Expectations. In Tightening the Reins, edited by Häckel, Erwin and Stein, Gotthard, 8998. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Perkovich, George. 2006. The End of the Nonproliferation Regime? Current History 105 (694): 355362.Google Scholar
Perkovich, George. 2008. Nuclear Developments in the GCC: Risks and Trends. In Gulf Yearbook 2007–2008. Gulf Research Center.Google Scholar
Perkovich, George. 2010. Toward Realistic U.S.–India Relations. Carnegie Moscow Center.Google Scholar
Pfaff, William. 2005. Nuclear Realities. The New York Times, August 13.Google Scholar
Pilat, Joseph F. 1989. Challenges to the Nonproliferation Regime into the 21st Century: Conference Summary. Los Alamos National Laboratory.Google Scholar
ed. 2019. Nuclear Latency and Hedging: Concepts, History, and Issues. Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
2020. A World without the NPT Redux. United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research.Google Scholar
Plummer, Martyn. 2010. JAGS (Just Another Gibbs Sampler), version 2.1.0.Google Scholar
Pollack, Jonathan D., and Reiss, Mitchell B.. 2004. South Korea: The Tyranny of Geography and the Vexations of History. In The Nuclear Tipping Point: Why States Reconsider Their Nuclear Choices, edited by Campbell, Kurt M., Einhorn, Robert J., and Reiss, Mitchell B.. Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. Patterns of Congressional Voting. American Journal of Political Science 35 (1): 228.Google Scholar
Popp, Roland, Horovitz, Liviu, and Wenger, Andreas, eds. 2016. Negotiating the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty: Origins of the Nuclear Order. Routledge.Google Scholar
Potter, William C. 1995. The Politics of Nuclear Renunciation: The Cases of Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine. Stimson Center.Google Scholar
Potter, William C. 2005a. India and the New Look of U.S. Nonproliferation Policy. The Nonproliferation Review 12 (2): 343354.Google Scholar
Potter, William C. 2005b. The NPT Review Conference: 188 States in Search of Consensus. The International Spectator 40 (3): 1931.Google Scholar
Potter, William C. 2010. The NPT & the Sources of Nuclear Restraint. Daedalus 139 (1): 6881.Google Scholar
Potter, William C. 2016. The Unfulfilled Promise of the 2015 NPT Review Conference. Survival 58 (1): 151178.Google Scholar
Prina, L. Edgar. 1984. Cranston Claims Iraq, Iran in Nuclear Weapons Race. San Diego Union-Tribune, June 26.Google Scholar
Pulcini, Giordana, and Rabinowitz, Or. 2021. An Ounce of Prevention – A Pound of Cure? The Reagan Administration’s Nonproliferation Policy and the Osirak Raid. Journal of Cold War Studies 23 (2): 440.Google Scholar
Purkitt, Helen E., and Burgess, Stephen F.. 2005. South Africa’s Weapons of Mass Destruction. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Putz, Catherine. 2019. Low Enriched Uranium Bank Officially Operational in Kazakhstan. The Diplomat, October 29.Google Scholar
Quester, George H. 1967. Is the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Enough? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 23 (9): 3537.Google Scholar
Quester, George H. 1970. Japan and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Asian Survey 10 (9): 765778.Google Scholar
Quester, George H. 1972. Some Conceptual Problems in Nuclear Proliferation. American Political Science Review 66 (2): 490497.Google Scholar
Quester, George H. 1973. The Politics of Nuclear Proliferation. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, Or, and Miller, Nicholas L.. 2015. Keeping the Bombs in the Basement: U.S. Nonproliferation Policy toward Israel, South Africa, and Pakistan. International Security 40 (1): 4786.Google Scholar
Rainey, Carlisle. 2016. Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models. Political Analysis 24 (3): 339355.Google Scholar
Rathbun, Nina Srinivasan. 2006. The Role of Legitimacy in Strengthening the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime. The Nonproliferation Review 13 (2): 227252.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G.. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58 (2): 277309.Google Scholar
Reiss, Mitchell. 1988. Without the Bomb: The Politics of Nuclear Nonproliferation. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Reiss, Mitchell. 1995. Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain Their Nuclear Capabilities. Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan. 2014. Security Commitments and Nuclear Proliferation. Foreign Policy Analysis 10 (1): 6180.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Celia L., and Wan, Wilfred T.. 2012. Empirical Trends in Sanctions and Positive Inducements in Nonproliferation. In Sanctions, Statecraft, and Nuclear Proliferation, edited by Solingen, Etel, 56122. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Wayne. 2000. Australia’s Bid for the Atomic Bomb. Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Richelson, Jeffrey. 2007. Spying on the Bomb: American Nuclear Intelligence from Nazi Germany to Iran and North Korea. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Rockwood, Laura. 2018. Evaluation of the Impact of the Model Additional Protocol on Non-Nuclear-Weapon States with Comprehensive Safeguards Agreements. Swedish Radiation Safety Authority.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Rublee, Maria Rost. 2008. Taking Stock of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime: Using Social Psychology to Understand Regime Effectiveness. International Studies Review 10 (3): 420450.Google Scholar
Rublee, Maria Rost. 2009a. Nonproliferation Norms: Why States Choose Nuclear Restraint. University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Rublee, Maria Rost. 2009b. The Future of Japanese Nuclear Policy. Strategic Insights 8 (2): 111.Google Scholar
Rublee, Maria Rost. 2010. The Nuclear Threshold States. The Nonproliferation Review 17 (1): 4970.Google Scholar
Rublee, Maria Rost, and Cohen, Avner. 2018. Nuclear Norms in Global Governance: A Progressive Research Agenda. Contemporary Security Policy 39 (3): 317340.Google Scholar
Rust, Dean. 2017. How We’ve Come to View the NPT: Three Pillars. In Nuclear Rules, Not Just Rights: The NPT Reexamined, edited by Sokolski, Henry D., 37101. Nonproliferation Policy Education Center.Google Scholar
Ruzicka, Jan, and Wheeler, Nicholas J.. 2010. The Puzzle of Trusting Relationships in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. International Affairs 86 (1): 6985.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. 1996. Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb. International Security 21 (3): 5486.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. 2010a. Nuclear Latency and Nuclear Proliferation. In Forecasting Nuclear Proliferation in the 21st Century, edited by Potter, William C. and Mukhatzhanova, Gaukar, 1: 80101. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. 2010b. Shared Responsibilities for Nuclear Disarmament: A Global Debate. American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott D. 2011. The Causes of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation. Annual Review of Political Science 14 (1): 225244.Google Scholar
Samore, Gary. 2005. Iran’s Strategic Weapons Programmes: A Net Assessment. International Institute for Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
Samuels, Richard J., and Schoff, James L.. 2015. Japan’s Nuclear Hedge: Beyond “Allergy” and Breakout. Political Science Quarterly 130 (3): 475503.Google Scholar
Sanger, David E., and Miller, Judith. 2003. Libya to Give up Arms Programs, Bush Announces. The New York Times, December 20.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Jayita. 2019. U.S. Policy to Curb West European Nuclear Exports, 1974–1978. Journal of Cold War Studies 21 (2): 110149.Google Scholar
Sauer, Tom. 2006. The Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime in Crisis. Peace Review 18 (3): 333340.Google Scholar
Schanfein, Mark. 2008. International Atomic Energy Unattended Monitoring Systems. In Nuclear Safeguards, Security, and Nonproliferation, edited by Doyle, James E., 113133. 1st ed. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Schnakenberg, Keith E., and Fariss, Christopher J.. 2014. Dynamic Patterns of Human Rights Practices. Political Science Research and Methods 2 (1): 131.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Lowell H. 2014. How Supportive of the Nonproliferation Regime Are the United States and Its Allies? In State Behavior and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime, edited by Fields, Jeffrey R., 149168. University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. 1969. Should the U.S. Senate Consent Now to Ratification of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty? CON. Congressional Digest 48 (1): 11.Google Scholar
Seo, Yeon-Gyu, Cho, Sung-Bae, and Yao, Xin. 2000. The Impact of Payoff Function and Local Interaction on the N-Player Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma. Knowledge and Information Systems 2 (4): 461478.Google Scholar
Shaker, Mohamed I. 1992. The 1995 NPT Extension Conference: A Rejoinder. Bulletin of Peace Proposals 23 (4): 3336.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2000. International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs. American Political Science Review 94 (4): 819835.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2010. Treaty Compliance and Violation. Annual Review of Political Science 13 (1): 273296.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Hopkins, Daniel J.. 2005. The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods. American Political Science Review 99 (4): 623631.Google Scholar
Simpson, John. 1984. The Non‐Proliferation Treaty at Its Half‐Life. Arms Control 5 (3): 112.Google Scholar
Simpson, John, and Nielsen, Jenny. 2005. The 2005 NPT Review Conference. The Nonproliferation Review 12 (2): 271301.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David. 1988. Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on Material Capabilities of States, 1816–1985. International Interactions 14 (2): 115132.Google Scholar
Singh, Sonali, and Way, Christopher R.. 2004. The Correlates of Nuclear Proliferation: A Quantitative Test. Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (6): 859885.Google Scholar
Smart, Ian. 1975. Non-Proliferation Treaty: Status and Prospects. In NPT: Paradoxes and Problems, edited by Marks, Anne W.. Arms Control Association.Google Scholar
Smith, Bradley C., and Spaniel, William. 2020. Introducing ν-CLEAR: A Latent Variable Approach to Measuring Nuclear Proficiency. Conflict Management and Peace Science 37 (2): 232256.Google Scholar
Smith, R. Jeffrey, and Oberdorfer, Don. 1988. Taiwan to Close Nuclear Reactor: U.S. Voiced Concern on Spread of Weapons. The Washington Post, March 24.Google Scholar
Smith, Roger K. 1987. Explaining the Non-Proliferation Regime: Anomalies for Contemporary International Relations Theory. International Organization 41 (2): 253281.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985. Coordination versus Prisoners’ Dilemma: Implications for International Cooperation and Regimes. American Political Science Review 79 (4): 923942.Google Scholar
Sokolski, Henry D. 2008. Assessing the IAEA’s Ability to Verify the NPT. In Falling Behind: International Scrutiny of the Peaceful Atom, edited by Sokolski, Henry D.. Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Sokolski, Henry D. 2010. What Does the History of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Tell Us about Its Future? In Reviewing the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, edited by Sokolski, Henry D.. Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Sokolski, Henry D., and Gilinsky, Victor. 2009. Locking down the NPT. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.Google Scholar
Solingen, Etel. 1994. The Political Economy of Nuclear Restraint. International Security 19 (2): 126169.Google Scholar
Solingen, Etel. 2007. Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Solingen, Etel. 2010. The Perils of Prediction: Japan’s Once and Future Nuclear Status. In Forecasting Nuclear Proliferation in the 21st Century, edited by Potter, William C. and Mukhatzhanova, Gaukar, 2:131157. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Solingen, Etel. ed. 2012. Sanctions, Statecraft, and Nuclear Proliferation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spaniel, William. 2019. Bargaining over the Bomb: The Successes and Failures of Nuclear Negotiations. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spector, Leonard S., and Cohen, Avner. 2008. Israel’s Airstrike on Syria’s Reactor: Implications for the Nonproliferation Regime. Arms Control Today 38 (6): 1521.Google Scholar
Speier, Richard H., Chow, Brian G., and Starr, S. Rae. 2001. Nonproliferation Sanctions. RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Spies, Michael. 2006. Iran and the Limits of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime. American University International Law Review 22 (3): 401433.Google Scholar
Squassoni, Sharon. 2008. Looking Back: The 1978 Nuclear Nonproliferation Act. Arms Control Today 38 (10): 6467.Google Scholar
St John, Ronald Bruce. 2004. “Libya Is Not Iraq”: Preemptive Strikes, WMD and Diplomacy. Middle East Journal 58 (3): 386402.Google Scholar
Stanic, Nada. 1989. Nuclear Planning Ban Said to End Nuclear Option for Yugoslavia. Nucleonics Week, July 13.Google Scholar
Steinwart, Ingo, and Christmann, Andreas. 2008. Support Vector Machines. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Stoiber, Carlton. 2003. The Evolution of NPT Review Conference Final Documents, 1975–2000. The Nonproliferation Review 10 (3): 126166.Google Scholar
Stone, Randall W. 2004. The Political Economy of IMF Lending in Africa. American Political Science Review 98 (4): 577591.Google Scholar
Stone, Randall W. 2008. The Scope of IMF Conditionality. International Organization 62 (4): 589620.Google Scholar
Strulak, Tadeusz. 1993. The Nuclear Suppliers Group. The Nonproliferation Review 1 (1): 210.Google Scholar
Stulberg, Adam N. 2013. Internationalization of the Fuel Cycle and the Nuclear Energy Renaissance: Confronting the Credible Commitment Problem. In The Nuclear Renaissance and International Security, edited by Stulberg, Adam N. and Fuhrmann, Matthew, 97123. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Stussi-Lauterberg, Jurg. 1995. Historical Outline on the Question of Swiss Nuclear Armament. U.S. Department of State Translation.Google Scholar
Sulzberger, A. O. Jr. 1981. Ex-Inspector Asserts Iraq Planned to Use Reactor to Build A-Bombs. The New York Times, June 20.Google Scholar
Sun, Yanmin, Wong, Andrew K. C., and Kamel, Mohamed S.. 2009. Classification of Imbalanced Data: A Review. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 23 (4): 687719.Google Scholar
Swets, John A. 1988. Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic Systems. Science 240 (4857): 12851293.Google Scholar
Tape, James, and Pilat, Joseph F.. 2008. Nuclear Safeguards and the Security of Nuclear Materials. In Nuclear Safeguards, Security, and Nonproliferation, edited by Doyle, James E., 1730. 1st ed. Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Thayer, Bradley A. 1995. The Causes of Nuclear Proliferation and the Utility of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime. Security Studies 4 (3): 463519.Google Scholar
Titterton, Ernest. 1969. A “Worthless Bit of Paper.” Sydney Morning Herald, July 25.Google Scholar
Topaloff, Liubomir K. 2017. Japan’s Nuclear Moment. The Diplomat, April 21.Google Scholar
Treier, Shawn, and Jackman, Simon. 2008. Democracy As a Latent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 201217.Google Scholar
Tzeng, Peter. 2013. Nuclear Leverage. The Nonproliferation Review 20 (3): 473492.Google Scholar
Unger, Bruce. 1976. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference: An Unsuccessful Attempt to Stem the Tide. World Affairs 139 (2): 87111.Google Scholar
United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. 1968a. Statement by the Pakistani representative to the Second Committee of the Conference on Non-Nuclear Weapon States.Google Scholar
United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. 1968b. Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).Google Scholar
United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. 1969. Switzerland: Ratification of Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).Google Scholar
United States Senate. 2016. Reviewing the Civil Nuclear Agreement with Norway. Hearing Before the Committee on Foreign Relations. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Urpelainen, Johannes. 2010. Enforcing International Environmental Cooperation: Technological Standards Can Help. The Review of International Organizations 5 (4): 475496.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of State. 2020. Statement on the 50th Anniversary of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. 2008. Report on Whether Public Statements Regarding Iraq by U.S. Government Officials Were Substantiated by Intelligence. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
van Wyk, Jo-Ansie, and van Wyk, Anna-Mart. 2015. From the Nuclear Laager to the Non-Proliferation Club: South Africa and the NPT. South African Historical Journal 67 (1): 3246.Google Scholar
Van Doren, Charles N., and Bunn, George. 1990. Progress and Peril at the Fourth NPT Review Conference. Arms Control Today 20 (8): 812.Google Scholar
Verdier, Daniel. 2008. Multilateralism, Bilateralism, and Exclusion in the Nuclear Proliferation Regime. International Organization 62 (3): 439476.Google Scholar
Volpe, Tristan A. 2016. Atomic Inducements: The Case for “Buying Out” Nuclear Latency. The Nonproliferation Review 23 (3–4): 481493.Google Scholar
Volpe, Tristan A. 2017. Atomic Leverage: Compellence with Nuclear Latency. Security Studies 26 (3): 517544.Google Scholar
Von Stein, Jana. 2005. Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance. American Political Science Review 99 (4): 611622.Google Scholar
Von Wielligh, Nic, and Von Wielligh-Steyn, Lydia. 2015. The Bomb: South Africa’s Nuclear Weapons Programme. Litera.Google Scholar
Wable, Kesav Murthy. 2007. The U.S.-India Strategic Nuclear Partnership: A Debilitating Blow to the Non-Proliferation Regime. Brooklyn Journal of International Law 33: 719759.Google Scholar
Walsh, Jim. 1997. Surprise Down Under: The Secret History of Australia’s Nuclear Ambitions. The Nonproliferation Review 5 (1): 120.Google Scholar
Walsh, Jim. 2005. The NPT and the Future of Non-proliferation. Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission.Google Scholar
Walsh, Jim. 2014. The Additional Protocol in the Middle East and North Africa. In State Behavior and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime, edited by Fields, Jeffrey R., 251275. University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, John. 1981. Reagan Outlines Nonproliferation Policy. Science 213 (4507): 522523.Google Scholar
Warburg, Gerald Felix. 2012. Nonproliferation Policy Crossroads: Lessons Learned from the US-India Nuclear Cooperation Agreement. The Nonproliferation Review 19 (3): 451471.Google Scholar
Ward, Michael D., Greenhill, Brian D., and Bakke, Kristin M.. 2010. The Perils of Policy by p-Value: Predicting Civil Conflicts. Journal of Peace Research 47 (4): 363375.Google Scholar
Way, Christopher, and Sasikumar, Karthika. 2004. Leaders and Laggards: When and Why Do Countries Sign the NPT? McGill University.Google Scholar
Way, Christopher, and Weeks, Jessica L. P.. 2014. Making It Personal: Regime Type and Nuclear Proliferation. American Journal of Political Science 58 (3): 705719.Google Scholar
Weiss, Leonard. 2007. U.S.-India Nuclear Cooperation. The Nonproliferation Review 14 (3): 429457.Google Scholar
Wesley, Michael. 2005. It’s Time to Scrap the NPT. Australian Journal of International Affairs 59 (3): 283299.Google Scholar
White House, The. 2005. Joint Statement between President George W. Bush and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.Google Scholar
Willenson, Kim. 1975. Korea North, Korea South. Newsweek, June 30.Google Scholar
Williams, Joshua, and Wolfsthal, Jon. 2005. The NPT at 35: A Crisis of Compliance or a Crisis of Confidence? Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Willis, David K. 1981. On the Trail of the A-bomb Makers. Christian Science Monitor, November 30.Google Scholar
Winn, Patrick. 2019. Japan Has Plutonium, Rockets and Rivals. Will It Ever Build a Nuke? Public Radio International, March 14.Google Scholar
Winters, Raven. 2005. Preventing Repeat Offenders: North Korea’s Withdrawal and the Need for Revision to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 38 (5): 14991529.Google Scholar
WMD Commission. 2005. Report of the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction.Google Scholar
Wohlstetter, Albert. 1976. Spreading the Bomb without Quite Breaking the Rules. Foreign Policy 25 (Winter): 8896, 145179.Google Scholar
Wolfsthal, Jon. 2004. Seoul Should Not Fear the United Nations Security Council. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Wollenmann, Reto. 2004. Zwischen Atomwaffe und Atomsperrvertrag: Die Schweiz auf dem Weg von der Nuklearen Option zum Nonproliferationsvertrag (1958–1969). ETH Zurich.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2015. World Development Indicators.Google Scholar
Wulf, Norman A. 2000. Observations from the 2000 NPT Review Conference. Arms Control Today 30 (9): 39.Google Scholar
Yao, Xin, and Darwen, Paul J.. 1995. An Experimental Study of N-Person Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Games. Progress in Evolutionary Computation 956: 90108.Google Scholar
Yee, Min S. 1968. Formosa Reported Building N-Weapon. Boston Globe, May 6.Google Scholar
Zarate, Robert. 2008. The NPT, IAEA Safeguards and Peaceful Nuclear Energy: An “Inalienable Right,” but Precisely to What? In Falling Behind: International Scrutiny of the Peaceful Atom, edited by Sokolski, Henry D., 221290. Strategic Studies Institute.Google Scholar