Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-j5sqr Total loading time: 0.448 Render date: 2022-09-29T08:29:58.856Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

2 - The self in philosophy, neuroscience and psychiatry: an epistemic approach

from Part I - Conceptual background

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2009

Georg Northoff
Affiliation:
Harvard University, MA, USA
Alexander Heinzel
Affiliation:
Harvard University, MA, USA
Tilo Kircher
Affiliation:
Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
Anthony David
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Get access

Summary

Abstract

The self and self-consciousness are investigated in such different disciplines as neuroscience, psychiatry and philosophy. The resulting theories of these investigations are as different as are these three sciences. This often leads to the question which of the theories should be considered as the best theory or even as the true theory.

However in this chapter we hold the opinion that none of the different theories is comprehensive in a way that covers all the questions brought up by the other disciplines. We think that this is due to the fact that the three different sciences start from different perspectives, namely the first-person perspective, second-person perspective and third-person perspective. Consequently their resulting theories cannot be regarded as an absolute truth, but only as true in the scope of their perspective.

In this chapter the different perspectives are characterized according to their epistemic limitations and abilities. Furthermore it is shown how these perspectives lead to characteristic implications concerning the theories of the self in the different sciences.

Introduction

The self and self-consciousness have always been important problems in philosophy, especially dealt with in the philosophy of mind (Gloy, 1998). However the recent philosophy of mind often refers to Descartes' theory as its beginning (Seager, 1999). His special methodology and his theses have deeply influenced many of his successors. Descartes begins with our reflective consciousness, which questions anything. It results in a fundamental doubt towards everything except the fact that we think or doubt, e.g. the consciousness or the mind does not doubt its own existence.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bollas, L. (1997). Der Schatten des Objekts: Das ungedachte Bekannte. Zur Psychoanalyse der frühen Entwicklung. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta
Brennan, A. (1989/90). Fragmented selves and the problem of ownership. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 90, 143–58Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Churchland, P. M. (1985). Reduction, qualia and the direct introspection of brain states. Journal of Philosophy, 15, 8–28Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1984). First-person authority. Dialectica, 17, 101–11Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1988). Quining qualia. In Consciousness, ed. A. Marcel & E. Bisiach, pp. 42–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Descartes, R. (1904). Principles of philosophy. In Oeuvres de Descartes, ed. C. Adams & P. Tannery, pp. 34–78. Paris: J. Vrin
Frith, U. (1998). Literally changing the brain. Brain, 121, 1011–12Google Scholar
Gadenne, V. (1996). Bewusstsein, Kognition und Gehirn, Einführung in die Psychologie des Bewusstseins. Bern: Hans Huber
Glover, P. (1988). The Philosophy and Psychology of Personal Identity. London: Penguin
Gloy, K. (1998). Bewu[W9]tseinstheorien. Munich: Verlag Karl Alber
Holly, W. J. (1986). On D. Davidson first person authority. Dialectica, 40, 153–6Google Scholar
Hurely, S. L. (1998). Consciousness in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Husserl, E. (1966). Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewu[W9]teins, pp. 123–78. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff
Jacobson, E. (1978). Das Selbst und die Welt der Objekte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp
Melzack, R. (1989). Phantom limbs, the self and the brain. Canadian Psychology, 30, 1–16Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). Phänomenologie der Wahrnehmung. Translated by R. Boehm. Berlin: De Gruyter
Metzinger, T. (1993). Subjekt und Selbstmodell. Paderborn: Schöningh Press
Metzinger, T. (1995). Conscious Experience. Thoverton: Imprint Academic
Metzinger, T. (1997). Ich-Störungen als pathologische Formen mentaler Selbstmodellierung. In Neuropsychiatrie und Neurophilosophie, ed. G. Northoff, pp. 169–91. Paderborn: Schöningh Press
Nagel, T. (1984). Über das Leben, die Seele und den Tod. Frankfurt am Main: Neurowissenschaftliche Bibliothek, Etteneum
Nagel, T. (1986). The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Northoff, G. (1995). Neuropsychiatrische Phänomene und das Leib-Seele Problem: Qualia im Knotenpunkt zwischen Gehirn und Subjekt. Essen: Die blaue Eule Verlag
Northoff, G. (2000). Phänomenale, tiefenpsychologische und neurowissenschaftliche Perspektiven der Katatonie: eine epistemische Betrachtung. In Depression, Manie und schizoaffektive Psychosen, ed. H. B[W8]ker, pp. 34–67. Giessen: Psychological Publisher
Northoff, G. (2001). ‘Brain-paradox’ and ‘embedment’ – do we need a ‘philosophy of the brain’? Brain and Mind, 2, 195–211
Northoff, G. (2002). Philosophy of the Brain. Hypothesis of ‘Embedment’. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Seager, W. (1999). Theories of Consciousness. Trowbridge, Wiltshire: Redwood Books
Shoemaker, S. & Swinburne, R. (1984). Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell
Varela, F. (1998). Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem. In Explaining Consciousness – The Hard Problem, ed. J. Shear, pp. 1-13. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
5
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×