Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-zdfhw Total loading time: 1.357 Render date: 2022-08-10T02:06:47.292Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

PART III - Acquiring Suprasegmental Features

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

Ratree Wayland
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Second Language Speech Learning
Theoretical and Empirical Progress
, pp. 247 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baese-Berk, M. M. (2019). Interactions between speech perception and production during learning of novel phonemic categories. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 81(4), 9811005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauman, J., Blodgett, A., Rytting, C. A., & Shamoo, J. (2009). The ups and downs of Vietnamese tones: A description of native speaker and adult learner tone systems for Northern and Southern Vietnamese (Technical Report No. E.5.3 TTO 2118). College Park, MD: University of Maryland Center for Advanced Study of Language.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James E. Flege (pp. 1334). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettoni-Techio, M., Rauber, A. S., & Koerich, R. D. (2007). Perception and production of word-final alveolar stops by Brazilian Portuguese learners of English. In INTERSPEECH 2007 (pp. 22932296), Antwerp.Google Scholar
Blodgett, A., Bauman, J., Bowles, A., & Winn, M. B. (2008). A comparison of native speaker and American adult learner Vietnamese lexical tones. In Proceedings of Acoustics 08 (pp. 688692), Paris.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.4.08).Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E. (1997). Perception and production of a new vowel category by second-language learners. In James, A & Leather, J (Eds.), Second-language speech: Structure and process (pp. 5374). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunelle, M. (2015). Vietnamese (Tiếng Việt). In Jenny, M & Sidwell, P (Eds.), The handbook of Austroasiatic languages (Vol. 2, pp. 909953). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Burnham, D., & Francis, E. (1997). The role of linguistic experience in the perception of Thai tones. In Abramson, A. S. (Ed.), Southeast Asian linguistics studies in honor of Vichin Panupong (pp. 2948). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Byun, T. M., & Tiede, M. (2017). Perception-production relations in later development of American English rhotics. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0172022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, E. W., de Verdière, Colin, Erickson, É, Lazard, J, Lazarus, S, F., & Thite, S. (2010). Homotopic Fréchet distance between curves or, walking your dog in the woods in polynomial time. Computational Geometry, 43(3), 295311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G. (1974). The pitch range of English and Chinese speakers. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2(2), 159171.Google Scholar
Ding, H., Hoffmann, R., & Jokisch, O. (2011). An investigation of tone perception and production in German learners of Mandarin. Archives of Acoustics, 36(3). doi:10.2478/v10168-011-0036-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giang, Đinh Lư. (2011). Tình hình song ngữ Khmer-Việt tại đồng bằng sông Cửu Long: một số vấn đề lý thuyết và thực tiễn [Khmer-Vietnamese bilingualism in the Mekong Delta: Theoretical and practical issues]. PhD dissertation, Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
Giang, Đinh Lư. (2015). Các đặc điểm chính của song ngữ Khmer-Việt vùng Nam Bộ [The main features of Khmer-Vietnamese bilingualism in the South]. Ngôn ngữ & Đời sóng, 4(234), 8188.Google Scholar
Elvin, J., Williams, D., & Escudero, P. (2016). The relationship between perception and production of Brazilian Portuguese vowels in European Spanish monolinguals. Loquens, 3(2), e031.Google Scholar
Escudero, P. R. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1993). Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(3), 15891608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1999). The relation between L2 production and perception. In Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (pp. 12731276), Berkeley.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Frieda, E. M., & Nozawa, T. (1997). Amount of native-language (L1) use affects the pronunciation of an L2. Journal of Phonetics, 25(2), 169186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., MacKay, I. R. A., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ perception and production of English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 29732987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, A. L., Ciocca, V., Ma, L., & Fenn, K. (2008). Perceptual learning of Cantonese lexical tones by tone and non-tone language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 36(2), 268294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandour, J. T. (1983). Tone perception in Far Eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
General Statistics Office of Vietnam. (2010). The 2009 Vietnam population and housing census: Major findings. Hanoi: General Statistics Office of Vietnam. Retrieved from www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=515&idmid=5&ItemID=9813Google Scholar
Ghosh, S. S., Matthies, M. L., Maas, E., … Perkell, J. S. (2010). An investigation of the relation between sibilant production and somatosensory and auditory acuity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(5), 30793087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guenther, F. H., & Perkell, J. S. (2004). A neural model of speech production and supporting experiments. In From sound to sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech communication (pp. B98B106). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., & Pederson, E. (2007). Investigating the role of attention in phonetic learning. In Bohn, O.-S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 5777). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallé, P. A., Chang, Y.-C., & Best, C. T. (2004). Identification and discrimination of Mandarin Chinese tones by Mandarin Chinese vs. French listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 32(3), 395421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Châu, Hoàng Thị. (1989). Tiếng Việt trên các miền đất nước: Phương ngữ học [Vietnamese in the various areas of the motherland: A dialectological study]. Hà Nội: NXB Khoa học Xã hội.Google Scholar
Huang, T. (2007). Perception of Mandarin tones by Chinese-and English-speaking listeners. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 17971800), Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2015). The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(2), 817832.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirby, J. (2014). Incipient tonogenesis in Phnom Penh Khmer: Acoustic and perceptual studies. Journal of Phonetics, 43, 6985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, J., & Giang, Đinh Lư. (2017). On the r>h shift in Kiên Giang Khmer. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 10(2), 6685.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-S., Vakoch, D. A., & Wurm, L. H. (1996). Tone perception in Cantonese and Mandarin: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(5), 527542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, E. S., & Law, F. F. (2010). Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: Language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationship. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(3), 12901305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llisterri, J. (1995). Relationships between speech production and speech perception in a second language. In Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 9299), Stockholm.Google Scholar
Mennen, I. (1998). Can language learners ever acquire the intonation of a second language? In STiLL-1998 (pp. 1720), Marholmen, Sweden.Google Scholar
Miracle, W. C. (1989). Tone production of American students of Chinese: A preliminary acoustic study. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 24, 4965.Google Scholar
Morrison, G. S. (2003). Perception and production of Spanish vowels by English speakers. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 15331536), Barcelona.Google Scholar
Müller, M. (2007). Dynamic time warping. In Information retrieval for music and motion (pp. 6984). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagle, C. L. (2018). Examining the temporal structure of the perception-production link in second language acquisition: A longitudinal study. Language Learning, 68(1), 234270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, H. T., & Macken, M. A. (2008). Factors affecting the production of Vietnamese tones: A study of American learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(1), 4977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huệ, Nguyễn Thị. (2010). Tiếp xúc ngôn ngữ giữa tiếng Khmer với tiếng Việt (trường hợp tỉnh Trà Vinh) [Language contact between Khmer and and Vietnamese in Tra Vinh province]. PhD dissertation, Ho Chi Minh City University of Social Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
Lợi, Nguyễn Văn & Edmondson, J. A. (1998). Tone and voice quality in modern northern Vietnamese: Instrumental case studies. Mon-Khmer Studies, 28, 118.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., & Bouchon, C. (2011). The relation between perception and production in L2 phonological processing. In INTERSPEECH (pp. 161164), Florence.Google Scholar
Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., Lane, H., … Zandipour, M. (2004). The distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(4), 23382344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phạm, A. H. (2003). Vietnamese tone: A new analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sakai, M., & Moorman, C. (2018). Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, A., & Strange, W. (1982). The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3(3), 243261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sochoeun, C. (2006). Khmer Krom migration and their identity. MA thesis, Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh.Google Scholar
Strange, W. (1995). Phonetics of second-language acquisition: Past, present, future. In Branderud, P & Elenius, K (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 7683), Stockholm.Google Scholar
Minh, Thạch Ngọc. (1999). Monosyllabization in Kiengiang Khmer. Mon-Khmer Studies, 29, 8195.Google Scholar
Phương, Vũ Thanh. (1982). Phonetic properties of Vietnamese tones across dialects. In Bradley, D (Ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian linguistics: No. 8. Tonation (pp. 5576). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. A. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 10331043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y., Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (2012). L2 acquisition and processing of Mandarin tones. In Li, P, Tan, L. H., Bates, E, & Tzeng, O. J. L. (Eds.), Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics: Vol. 1. Chinese (pp. 250256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. (2003). Perceptual discrimination of Thai tones by naive and experienced learners of Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(01), 113129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54(4), 681712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 75(6), 18661878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, B. (2012). The gap between the perception and production of tones by American learners of Mandarin – an intralingual perspective. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 1(1), 3353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, B. (2015). Perception and production of Mandarin tones by native speakers and L2 learners. Berlin: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-662-44645-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, F., Jügler, J., Andreeva, B., Möbius, B., & Trouvain, J. (2014). Too cautious to vary more? A comparison of pitch variation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 10371041), Dublin.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. E. (1973). Intrinsic F 0 in vowels: Physiological correlates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53(1), 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. E. (1978). Correlation analysis of the physiological factors controlling fundamental voice frequency. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63(1), 211222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baills, F., Suárez-González, N., González-Fuente, S., & Prieto, P. (2019). Observing and producing pitch gestures facilitates the learning of Mandarin Chinese tones and words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 3358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.48. Retrieved from www.praat.org/Google Scholar
Chen, S., Wiltshire, C., Li, B., & Wayland, R. (2019). A quantitative analysis of tone sandhi in Mandarin and Nanjing Chinese based on surface pitch contours and underlying pitch targets. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 6.Google Scholar
Chen, S., Zhang, C., McCollum, A. G., & Wayland, R. (2017). Statistical modelling of phonetic and phonologised perturbation effects in tonal and non-tonal languages. Speech Communication, 88, 1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, X. 程潇 (2011). 浅析外国留学生习得汉语声调的难点及教学策略 [Primary analysis of foreign students’ difficulty with Chinese tone acquisition and instructional strategies]. Retrieved from www.lwlm.com/yuyanxue/201102/542663.htmGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallé, P. A. (1994).Evidence for tone-specific activity of the sternohyoid muscle in modern standard Chinese. Language and Speech, 37(2), 103123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hao, Y.-C. (2012). Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 269279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, J. I., & Prieto, P. (2015). Intonational variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. In Frota, S & Prieto, P (Eds.), Intonation in romance (pp. 350439). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasisopa, B., El-Khoury Antonios, L., Jongman, A., Sereno, J. A., & Burnham, D. (2018). Training children to perceive non-native lexical tones: Tone language background, bilingualism, and auditory-visual information. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J., Dewey, D. P., Baker-Smemoe, W., Ring, S., Westover, A., & Eggett, D. L. (2015). L2 development during study abroad in China. System, 55, 123133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leather, J. (1996). Interrelation of perceptual and productive learning in the initial acquisition of second-language tone. In James, A & Leather, L (Eds.), Second-language speech: Structure and process (pp. 75101). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1977). The acquisition of tone in Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 4(2), 185199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). Perception practice, production practice, and musical ability in L2-Mandarin tone-word learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 593620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Wang, M., Perfetti, C. A., Brubaker, B., Wu, S., & MacWhinney, B. (2011). Learning a tonal language by attending to the tone: An in vivo experiment. Language Learning, 61, 11191141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Mirman, D., Dixon, J. A., & Magnuson, J. S. (2008). Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 475494.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morett, L. M., & Chang, L.-Y. (2015). Emphasising sound and meaning: Pitch gestures enhance Mandarin lexical tone acquisition. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30(3), 347353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1978). Production of tone. In Tone (pp. 539). New York, NY: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1948). Tone languages: A technique for determining the number and type of pitch contrasts in a language, with studies of tonemic substitution and fusion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rose, P. (1987). Considerations in the normalization of the fundamental frequency of linguistic tone. Speech Communication, 6, 343352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, C. K., & Best, C. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsukada, K., Xu, H., & Rattanasone, N. (2015). The perception of Mandarin lexical tones by listeners from different linguistic backgrounds. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 4(2), 141161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. J. (1995). Ye tan meiguo ren xuexi hanyu shengdiao [On American learners’ tone acquisition]. Language Teaching and Research, 2, 126140.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 10331043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wayland, R. P., & Guion, S. G. (2004). Training English and Chinese listeners to perceive Thai tones: A preliminary report. Language Learning, 54(4), 681712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, P. (2008). Development of lexical tone production in disyllabic words by 2-to 6-year-old Mandarin-speaking children. PhD dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Wong, P. (2012a). Acoustic characteristics of three-year-olds’ correct and incorrect monosyllabic Mandarin lexical tone productions. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 141151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, P. (2012b). Monosyllabic Mandarin tone productions by 3-year-olds growing up in Taiwan and in the United States: Interjudge reliability and perceptual results. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(5), 14231437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, P., Schwartz, R. G., & Jenkins, J. J. (2005). Perception and production of lexical tones by 3-year-old, Mandarin-speaking children. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 48, 10651079. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/074)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, L., Chen, X., Zhou, N., Li, Y., Zhao, X., & Han, D. (2007). Recognition of lexical tone production of children with an artificial neural network. Acta Otolaryngologica, 127(4), 365369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Y. (2013). ProsodyPro – A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. In Tools and resources for the analysis of speech prosody (TRASP 2013) (pp. 710). Aix-en-Provence, France.Google Scholar
Xu, Y., & Wang, Q. E. (2001). Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Speech Communication, 33, 319337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, B. (2015). Perception and production of Mandarin tones by native speakers and L2 learners. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, M. J. W. (2002). Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, X. N. (1999). Shanghai tonetics. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Archibald, J. (1992). Transfer of L1 parameter settings: Some empirical evidence from Polish metrics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 301339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, J. (1993). The learnability of English metrical parameters by adult Spanish speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching, 31/32, 129142.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2007). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.6.05) [Computer program].Google Scholar
Chrabaszcz, A., Winn, M., Lin, C. Y., & Idsardi, W. J. (2014). Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin, and Russian speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 14681479. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45, 207228. doi:10.1177/00238309020450030101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, A. (2005). Lexical stress. In Pisoni, D & Remez, R (Eds.), Handbook of speech perception (pp. 264289). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. (2015). Lexical stress in English pronunciation. In Reed, M & Levis, J. M. (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 106124). Chichester, England: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988). The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(1), 113121.Google Scholar
De Jong, K., & Zawaydeh, B. (1999). Stress, duration and intonation in Arabic word-level prosody. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastian, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastian-Galles, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106, 682706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E. (1981). The phonological basis of foreign accent: A hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly, 15(4), 443455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of “new” and “similar” phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 4765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., & Bohn, O. (1989). In instrumental study of vowel reduction and stress placement in Spanish-accented English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 3562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folkes, J., & Bond, Z. (1989). The vowels of stressed and unstressed syllables in nonnative English. Language Learning, 39, 341373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, D. (1955). Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4), 765768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, D. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1, 126152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. G. (2005). Knowledge of English word stress patterns in early and late Korean-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 503533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. G., Clark, J. J., Harada, T., & Wayland, R. P. (2003). Factors affecting stress placement for English non-words include syllabic structure, lexical class, and stress patterns of phonologically similar words. Language and Speech, 46, 403427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion, S. G., Harada, T., & Clark, J. J. (2004). Early and late Spanish-English bilinguals’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 7, 207226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1978). Tone and/or accent. In Napoli, D. J. (Ed.), Elements of tone, stress, and intonation (pp. 120). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2014). Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 793808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jesse, A., Poellmann, K., & Kong, Y-Y. (2017). English listeners use suprasegmental cues to lexical stress early during spoken word recognition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehiste, I., & Fox, R. A. (1992). Perception of prominence by Estonian and English listeners. Language and Speech, 35, 419434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, P. (1960). Some acoustic correlates of word stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 451454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, C. Y., Wang, M. I. N., Idsardi, W. J., & Xu, Y. I. (2014). Stress processing in Mandarin and Korean second language learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 316346. doi:10.1017/s1366728913000333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattys, S. L. (2000). The perception of primary and secondary stress in English. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 253265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattys, S. L., & Samuel, A. G. (2000). Implications of stress-pattern differences in spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 571596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasr, R. T. (1960). Phonemic length in Lebanese Arabic. Phonetica, 5, 209211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M., Shukla, M., & Mehler, J. (2011). Stress-timed vs. syllable-timed languages. In van Oostendorp, M, Ewen, C, Hume, E, & Rice, K (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology (pp. 11471159). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M., Gu, H., & Fan, J. (2013). English speakers’ perception of Spanish lexical stress: Context-driven L2 stress perception. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 186197. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, S., & Dupoux, E. (2002). A typological study of stress deafness. In Gussenhoven, C (Ed.), Proceedings of laboratory phonology 7 (pp. 203240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, D. (1986). Tone in lexical phonology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinisch, E., Jesse, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2010). Early use of phonetic information in spoken word recognition: Lexical stress drives eye movements immediately. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 772783. doi:10.1080/17470210903104412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sereno, J., & Jongman, A. (1995). Acoustic correlates of grammatical class. Language and Speech, 38, 5776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluijter, A. M. C., & van Heuven, V. J. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 24712485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teng, E. (2001). The use of stress and vowel reduction by Chinese learners of English. MA thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Thelwall, R., & Saadeddin, M. (1990). Arabic. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 20, 3739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueyama, M. (2000). Prosodic transfer: An acoustic study of L2 English versus L2 Japanese. PhD thesis, UCLA.Google Scholar
van der Hulst, H., & Smith, N. (1988). Autosegmental studies on pitch accent. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayland, R., & Guion, S. (2003). Perceptual discrimination of Thai tones by naive and experienced learners of Thai. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 113129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayland, R., Guion, S. G., & Landfair, B. L. (2006). Native Thai speakers’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 285304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, V., & Andruski, J. E. (2010). A cross-language study of perception of lexical stress in English. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39, 323344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, V., & Andruski, J. E. (2011). The effect of language experience on perception of stress typicality in English nouns and verbs. The Mental Lexicon, 6(2), 275301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Francis, A. (2010). The weighting of vowel quality in native and non-native listeners’ perception of English lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 260271. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2009.11.00CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Nissen, S., & Francis, A. (2008). Acoustic characteristics of English lexical stress produced by native Mandarin speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), 44984513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adank, P., Evans, B. G., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S. K. (2009). Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 520529. doi:10.1037/a0013552Google ScholarPubMed
Baese-Berk, M. M., Bradlow, A. R., & Wright, B. A. (2013). Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(3), EL174–EL180. doi:10.1121/1.4789864CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baese-Berk, M. M., & Morrill, T. H. (2015). Speaking rate consistency in native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(3), EL223–EL228. doi:10.1121/1.4929622CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, R. E., & Bradlow, A. R. (2009). Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody. Language and Speech, 52(4), 391413. doi:10.1177/0023830909336575CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, R. E., Baese-Berk, M., Bonnasse-Gahot, L., Kim, M., Van Engen, K. J., & Bradlow, A. R. (2011). Word durations in non-native English. Journal of Phonetics, 39(1), 117. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.10.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementaries. In Bohn, O. S. (Ed.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (Vols. 1–2, pp. 1334). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrie, S. A., McAuliffe, M. J., & Liss, J. M. (2012). Perceptual learning of dysarthric speech: A review of experimental studies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(1), 290305. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0349)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradlow, A. R. (n.d.). SpeechBox. Retrieved from https://speechbox.linguistics.northwestern.eduGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., & Alexander, J. A. (2007). Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4), 2339. doi:10.1121/1.2642103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707729. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradlow, A. R., Blasingame, M., & Lee, K. (2018). Language-independent talker-specificity in bilingual speech intelligibility: Individual traits persist across first-language and second-language speech. Laboratory Phonology, 9(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., Kim, M., & Blasingame, M. (2017). Language-independent talker-specificity in first-language and second-language speech production by bilingual talkers: L1 speaking rate predicts L2 speaking rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(2), 886899. doi:10.1121/1.4976044CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, C. M., & Garrett, M. F. (2004). Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(6), 36473658. doi:10.1121/1.1815131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., & Santesteban, M. (2004). Lexical access in bilingual speech production: Evidence from language switching in highly proficient bilinguals and L2 learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 491511. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jong, N. H., Groenhout, R., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 223243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 533557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. (2009). Linguistic perception of “similar” L2 sounds. Phonology in Perception, 15, 152190.Google Scholar
Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(5), 12411255. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/087)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=related:OXsRS-F20TEJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=en&num=20&as_sdt=0,5&as_ylo=1995&as_yhi=1995Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., Liu, S. H., & Yeni-Komshian, G. H. (2000). Age of learning effects on the duration of sentences produced in a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(2), 205228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, R. F., & Bent, T. (2017). Children’s use of semantic context in perception of foreign-accented speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(1), 223230. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Phonetic Association (IPA). (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ivanova, I., & Costa, A. (2008). Does bilingualism hamper lexical access in speech production? Acta Psychologica, 127(2), 277288. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.06.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, M., Horton, W. S., & Bradlow, A. R. (2011). Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), 125156. doi:10.1515/labphon.2011.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka, Z. (2006). Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 119135. doi:10.1017/S1366728906002483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R., & Scott, S. K. (2012). Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(7–8), 953978. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.705006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, K. B. (2015). Social expectation improves speech perception in noise. Language and Speech, 58(4), 502521. doi:10.1177/0023830914565191CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaughlin, D. J., & Van Engen, K. J. (2020). Task-evoked pupil response for accurately-recognized accented speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(2), EL151156. doi:10.31234/osf.io/vx2tyCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mok, P., & Dellwo, V. (2008). Comparing native and non-native speech rhythm using acoustic rhythmic measures: Cantonese, Beijing Mandarin and English. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody (pp. 423426). Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
Morrill, T., Baese-Berk, M., & Bradlow, A. (2016). Speaking rate consistency and variability in spontaneous speech by native and non-native speakers of English. doi:10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porretta, V., Kyröläinen, A.-J., & Tucker, B. V. (2015). Perceived foreign accentedness: Acoustic distances and lexical properties. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 77(7), 24382451. doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0916-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porretta, V., Tremblay, A., & Bolger, P. (2017). Got experience? PMN amplitudes to foreign-accented speech modulated by listener experience. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 5467. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porretta, V., Tucker, B. V., & Järvikivi, J. (2016). The influence of gradient foreign accentedness and listener experience on word recognition. Journal of Phonetics, 58, 121. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2016.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero-Rivas, C., Martin, C. D., & Costa, A. (2015). Processing changes when listening to foreign-accented speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(181), Article 167. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00167CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmale, R., Hollich, G., & Seidl, A. (2011). Contending with foreign accent in early word learning. Journal of Child Language, 38(5), 10961108. doi:10.1017/S0305000910000619CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sidaras, S. K., Alexander, J. E. D., & Nygaard, L. C. (2009). Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish accented speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(5), 33063316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Towell, R., & Dewaele, J. M. (2005). The role of psycholinguistic factors in the development of fluency amongst advanced learners of French. In Dewaele, J. M. (Ed.), Focus on French as a foreign language (pp. 210239). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M. M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R. (2010). The Wildcat corpus of native-and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language and Speech, 53(4), 510540. doi:10.1177/0023830910372495CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Engen, K. J., & Peelle, J. E. (2014). Listening effort and accented speech. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00577CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Engen, K. J., Phelps, J. E. B., Smiljanic, R., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2014). Enhancing speech intelligibility: Interactions among context, modality, speech style, and masker. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(5), 19081911. doi:10.1044/JSLHR-H-13-0076CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaughn, C., Baese-Berk, M., & Idemaru, K. (2019). Re-examining phonetic variability in native and non-native speech. Phonetica, 76, 327358. doi:10.1159/000487269CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, T., Jongman, A., & Sereno, J. (2007). Effects of acoustic variability in the perceptual learning of non-native-accented speech sounds. Phonetica, 64(2–3), 122144. doi:10.1159/000107913CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinberger, S. H. (n.d.). The Speech Accent Archive. George Mason University. Retrieved from http://accent.gmu.edu/Google Scholar
Witteman, M. J., Weber, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2013). Tolerance for inconsistency in foreign-accented speech. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21(2), 512519. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0519-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, X., & Fowler, C. A. (2013). Listening with a foreign-accent: The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit in Mandarin speakers of English. Journal of Phonetics, 41(5), 369378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×