Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-md8df Total loading time: 0.344 Render date: 2021-12-07T20:01:43.107Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

2 - Does International Law Obligate States to Open Their National Courts to Persons for the Invocation of Treaty Norms That Protect or Benefit Persons?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Sean D. Murphy
Affiliation:
Patricia Roberts Harris Research Professor of Law George Washington University Law School
David Sloss
Affiliation:
Santa Clara University, School of Law
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In its decisions in the LaGrand and Avena cases, the International Court of Justice (hereinafter, ICJ or the Court) determined that Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) creates “individual rights” (as opposed to just rights of states) and that the United States has an obligation to provide an individual with meaningful access to U.S. courts to vindicate those rights. On the basis of those determinations, it might be thought that international law generally obligates a state to open its courts for private persons to vindicate rights or benefits that a treaty accords to them, whether or not the treaty expressly provides for such a remedy. Such a proposition, however, is overbroad and does not follow from a close reading of the ICJ's decisions or from a more general assessment of the international legal system. This chapter seeks to provide a more nuanced assessment of whether international law generally obligates states to open their national courts to persons in such situations.

Because of the equal sovereign status of states, it is generally accepted in international law that a state cannot and should not sue another state in national courts to vindicate a treaty right. Instead, states normally address the matter through resort to international negotiation or dispute settlement. By contrast, the invocation of treaties in national courts usually arises in the context of actions by or against nonstate actors or private parties (i.e., persons or companies).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement
A Comparative Study
, pp. 61 - 119
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Manner, George, The Object Theory of the Individual in International Law, 46 Am. J. Int'l L.428 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, Richard D. & Dalton, Robert E., The Treaty on Treaties, 64 Am. J. Int'l L.495, 516–17 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kälin, Walter, Implementing Treaties in Domestic Law: From “Pacta Sunt Servanda” to “Anything Goes”? in Multilateral Treaty-Making111, 112–18 (Gowlland-Debbas, Vera ed., 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Hazel, International Law and Restraints on the Exercise of Jurisdiction by National Courts of States, in International Law361, 361–65 (Evans, Malcolm ed., 2d ed. 2006)Google Scholar
Jin, Huang & Jingsheng, Ma, Immunities of States and Their Property: The Practice of the People's Republic of China, 1 Hague Y.B. Int'l L.163 (1988)Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, Judicial Misgivings Regarding the Application of International Law: An Analysis of Attitudes of National Courts, 4 Eur. J. Int'l L.159, 169–75 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, Reviewing the Difficulties of Codification: On Ago's Classification of Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result in Relation to State Responsibility, 10 Eur. J. Int'l L.371, 374–78 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Rebecca J., State Accountability under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, in Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives228, 232 (Cook, Rebecca J. ed., 1994)Google Scholar
Shany, Yuval, Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law? 16 Eur. J. Int'l L.907, 909–11 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards, 31 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol.843 (1999)Google Scholar
Besselink, Leonard F.M., Entrapped by the Maximum Standard: On Fundamental Rights, Pluralism and Subsidiarity in the European Union, 35 Common Mkt. L. Rev.629 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, Ian & Lustgarten, Laurence, Making Rights Real: The Courts, Remedies, and the Human Rights Act, 58 Cambridge L.J.509, 527–31 (1999)Google Scholar
Francioni, Francesco, The Jurisprudence of International Human Rights Enforcement: Reflections on the Italian Experience, in Enforcing International Human Rights in Domestic Courts15, 17–18 (Conforti, Benedetto & Francioni, Francesco eds., 1997)Google Scholar
Hofmann, Rainer, The German Federal Constitutional Court and Public International Law: New Decisions, New Approaches? 47 Ger. Y.B. Int'l L.9, 18–19 (2004)Google Scholar
Zeigler, Donald H., Rights, Rights of Action, and Remedies: An Integrated Approach, 76 Wash. L. Rev.67, 95 (2001)Google Scholar
Stabile, Susan J., The Role of Congressional Intent in Determining the Existence of Implied Rights of Action, 71 Notre Dame L. Rev.861, 862 (1996)Google Scholar
Schuman, David, The Right to a Remedy, 65 Temp. L. Rev.1197, 1198–99 (1992)Google Scholar
Sloss, David, Constitutional Remedies for Statutory Violations, 89 Iowa L. Rev.355, 359 (2004)Google Scholar
Levinson, Daryl J., Rights, Essentialism and Remedial Equilibration, 99 Colum. L. Rev.857, 861 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Robert R., Access-to-Courts Provisions in United States Commercial Treaties, 47 Am. J. Int'l L.20 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melish, Tara J., Rethinking the “Less as More” Thesis: Supranational Litigation of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in the Americas, 39 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol.171, 248 (2006)Google Scholar
Schachter, Oscar, The Obligation to Implement the Covenant in Domestic Law, in The International Bill of Rights311 (Henkin, Louis ed., 1981)Google Scholar
Viljoen, Frans, Application of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights by Domestic Courts in Africa, 43 J. African L.1 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H.H., The Transformation of Europe, 100 Yale L.J.2403, 2427–30 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjorklund, Andrea K., Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims, 45 Va. J. Int'l L.809 (2005)Google Scholar
Aréchaga, Eduardo Jiménez, International Responsibility, Manual of Public International Law584 (Sørensen, Max ed., 1968)Google Scholar
Randall, Kenneth C., Universal Jurisdiction under International Law, 66 Tex. L. Rev.785 (1988)Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif, International Recognition of Victims' Rights, 6 Hum. Rts. L. Rev.203 (2006)Google Scholar
Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order, 17 Eur. J. Int'l L.1 (2006)CrossRef
Nijman, Janne & Nollkaemper, André, Beyond the Divide, in New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law341 (Nijman, Janne & Nollkaemper, André eds., 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiro, Peter J., Globalization and the (Foreign Affairs) Constitution, 63 Ohio St. L.J.649 (2002)Google Scholar
Martinez, Jenny S., Towards an International Judicial System, 56 Stan. L. Rev.429 (2003)Google Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×