Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-67wsf Total loading time: 1.604 Render date: 2022-05-22T05:42:55.271Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Part V - Towards a political economy of resources and structural change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Mauro L. Baranzini
Affiliation:
Università della Svizzera Italiana, Switzerland
Claudia Rotondi
Affiliation:
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano
Roberto Scazzieri
Affiliation:
Università di Bologna and University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelman, I., and Taft Morris, C. (1988a) Comparative Patterns of Economic Development 1850–1914, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Adelman, I., and Taft Morris, C. (1988b) ‘Interactions between Agriculture and Industry during the Nineteenth Century’, in Antonelli, G. and Curzio, A. Quadrio (eds.), The Agro-Technological System Towards 2000. A European Perspective, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford and Tokyo: North-Holland, pp. 2431.Google Scholar
Alchian, A. (1987) Rent’ in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, London: Macmillan, vol. 3, pp. 141–3.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1777) Observations on the Means of Exciting a Spirit of National Industry, Edinburgh: Cadell and Elliot.Google Scholar
Ando, A., and Fisher, F. M. (1963) ‘Near Decomposability, Partition and Aggregation, and the Relevance of Stability Discussions’, International Economic Review, 4.1, pp. 5367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, A., and Modigliani, F. (1963) ‘The Life-Cycle Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests’, American Economic Review, 53.1, pp. 5584.Google Scholar
Andreatta, N. (1958) Distribuzione del reddito e accumulazione del capitale, Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Andreoni, A. (2011) ‘Manufacturing Agrarian Change: Inter-Sectoral Learning, Agricultural Production and Technological Capabilities’, DRUID Working Paper series no. 11–13.
Andreoni, A. (2014) ‘Structural Learning: Embedding Discoveries and the Dynamics of Production’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 29.2, pp. 5874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, A., and Scazzieri, R. (2014) ‘Triggers of Change: Structural Trajectories and Production Dynamics’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38.6, pp. 1391–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonelli, G., and Quadrio Curzio, A. (eds.) (1988) The Agro-Technological System Towards 2000. A European Perspective, Amsterdam and New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
Araujo, J. T. (1992) ‘The Government Sector in Kaldor-Pasinetti Models of Growth and Income Distribution’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 15.2, pp. 211–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araujo, J. T. (1995) ‘Kaldor's Neo-Pasinetti Theorem and the Cambridge Theory of Distribution’, Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 63.3, pp. 311–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araujo, J. T., and Harcourt, G. C. (1993) Maurice Dobb, Joan Robinson and Gerald Shove on Accumulation and the Rate of Profits’, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 15.1, pp. 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araujo, R. A., and Teixeira, J. R. (2002) ‘Structural Change and Decisions on Investment Allocation’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 13.2, pp. 249–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araujo, R. A., and Teixeira, J. R. (2004) ‘Structural Economic Dynamics: An Alternative Approach to North-South Models’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28.5, pp. 705–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, R. (1982) ‘Réflexions sur la compatibilité des approches ricardiennes et keynésiennes du fonctionnement de l'activité économique’, Économie Appliquée, 35.3, pp. 405–48.Google Scholar
Arena, R. (1992) ‘Une synthèse entre post-keynésiens et néo-ricardiens est-elle encore possible?’, L'Actualité économique, 68.4, pp. 587606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, R., and Porta, P. L. (eds.) (2012a) Structural Dynamics and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arena, R., and Porta, P. L. (eds.) (2012b) ‘Introduction: Structural Dynamics and Contemporary Growth Theory’, in Arena, R. and Porta, P. L. (eds.) Structural Dynamics and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. (1971) ‘The Distribution of Wealth and the Individual Life-Cycle’, Oxford Economic Papers, 23.2, pp. 239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. (1974) ‘A Model of the Distribution of Wealth’, University of Essex and MIT, mimeo.
Baldone, S. (1996) ‘Vertical Integration, the Temporal Structure of Production Processes and Transition between Techniques’, in Landesmann, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Production and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranzini, A., Goldemberg, J., and Speck, S. (2000) ‘A Future for Carbon Taxes’, Ecological Economics, 32, pp. 395412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baranzini, M. (1979) ‘Review of Protagonisti del pensiero economico, Vol. I: Nascita e affermazione del marginalismo (1871–1890); Vol. II: Tradizione e rivoluzione in economia politica (1890–1936)’, ed. by Curzio, A. Quadrio and Scazzieri, R., The Economic Journal, 89.3, pp. 480–2.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. (1987) ‘Distribution Theories: Keynesian’, in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, vol. I, London: Macmillan, pp. 876–8.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. (1991) A Theory of Wealth, Distribution and Accumulation, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. (1995) ‘Distribution, Accumulation and Institutions’, in Heertje, A. (ed.) The Makers of Modern Economics, vol. II, Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, Vt.: E. Elgar, pp. 128.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. (2001) ‘The Foundations of the Cambridge School of Income Distribution and Structural Change’, in Teixeira, J. R. and Carneiro, F. G. (eds.) Growth, Redistribution and Structural Change, Brasilia: Universa Editora, pp. 1145.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. (2005) Modigliani's Life-Cycle Theory of Savings Fifty Years Later’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 58.233–4, pp. 109–72.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. (2008) ‘Flexible Saving and Economic Growth’, in Scazzieri, R., Sen, A., and Zamagni, S. (eds.) Markets, Money and Capital. Hicksian Economics for the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287308.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M., Benjuino, S. O., and Teixeira, J. R. (2003) ‘Taxation on Intergenerational Bequest and Redistribution of Wealth in a Class-Setting’, Discussion Paper no. 279, Dept. of Economics, University of Brasilia.
Baranzini, M., and Harcourt, G. C. (eds.) (1993) The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi Pasinetti, Basingstoke: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M., and Mari, C. (2011) ‘The Cantabrigensis-Italian School of Income and Wealth Distribution’, in Gli economisti post-keynesiani di Cambridge e l'Italia, Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Atti dei Convegni Lincei, no. 261, pp. 235340.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M., and Mirante, A. (2013) ‘The Cambridge Post-Keynesian School of Income and Wealth Distribution’, in Harcourt, G. C. and Kriesler, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics, vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 288361.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M., and Quadrio Curzio, A. (2012) ‘From Adam Smith to Structural Dynamics: Luigi Pasinetti's Life-Long Contribution’, paper presented at the Conference ‘The Economics of Structural Change: Theory, Institutions and Policies’, in honour of Luigi L. Pasinetti, Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, 12–13 September 2012.
Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (1986a) Foundations of Economics. Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford and New York: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (1986b) ‘Knowledge in Economics: A Framework’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R., (eds.), Foundations of Economics. Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford and New York: B. Blackwell, pp. 187.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (1990a) The Economic Theory of Structure and Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (1990b) ‘Introduction’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Economic Theory of Structure and Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 120.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (1990c) ‘Economic Structure. Analytical Perspectives’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) The Economic Theory of Structure and Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 227333.Google Scholar
Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (1997) ‘Profit and Rent in a Model of Capital Accumulation and Structural Dynamics’, in Arestis, P., Palma, G. and Sawyer, M. (eds.) Essays in Honour of Geoff Harcourt, vol. I, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 121–32.Google Scholar
Bharadwaj, K. (1978) Classical Political Economy and Rise to Dominance of Supply and Demand Theories, New Delhi: Orient Longman.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. (1968) Economic Theory in Retrospect, 2nd edn, London: Heinemann (1st edn 1964).Google Scholar
Bliss, C. J. (1975) Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income, Amsterdam and Oxford: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Bortis, H. (1997) Institutions, Behaviour and Economic Theory. A Contribution to Classical-Keynesian Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Britto, R. (1968) ‘A Study in Equilibrium Dynamics in Two Types of Growing Economies’, Economic Journal, 78.311, pp. 624–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britto, R. (1972) ‘On Differential Savings Propensities in Two-Class Growth Models’, Review of Economic Studies, 39.4, pp. 491–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byé, M. (1928) Les lois des rendements non proportionnels, Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2012) ‘The Political Economy of Circular Interdependencies and Vertical Integration: Opening the Black Box of “National Interest”’, SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2357981. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2357981.
Cardinale, I., and Coffman, D. (2014) ‘Economic Interdependencies and Political Conflict: Towards a Structural and Historical Approach to Taxation’, Economia Politica. Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, 31.3, pp. 277–300.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I., Coffman, D., and Scazzieri, R. (2015) ‘Towards a Political Economy of Industrial Fluctuations’, in Aftalion, A., Periodic Overproduction Crises, London: Anthem Press (1st French edn: Paris, 1913).Google Scholar
Cardinale, I., Coffman, D., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (2015) The Political Economy of the Eurozone, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I., and Scazzieri, R. (2013) ‘Technology and Production: The Economic Analysis of Tasks, Functions, and Material Structures’, paper presented at the Interdisciplinary Workshop on Techniques and Technology, 25–7 October 2013, University College London.
Carrà, S. (ed.) (2008) Le fonti di energia, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Carraro, C., Gerlagh, R., and van der Zwaan, B. (2003) ‘Endogenous Technical Change in Environmental Macroeconomics’, Resource and Energy Economics, 25, pp. 110.Google Scholar
Champernowne, D. G. (1945/46) ‘A Note on J. v. Neumann's Article on “A Model of Economic Equilibrium”’, Review of Economic Studies, 13.1, pp. 1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakravarty, S. (1989) John von Neumann's Model of an Expanding Economy: An Essay in Interpretation’, in Dore, M., Chakravarty, S. and Goodwin, R. (eds.) John von Neumann and Modern Economics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 6981.Google Scholar
Chenery, H. B. (1960) ‘Patterns of Industrial Growth’, The American Economic Review, 50.4, pp. 624–54.Google Scholar
Chenery, H. B. (1975) ‘A Structuralist Approach to Development Policy’, The American Economic Review, 65.2, Papers and Proceedings of the Eighty-seventh Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, pp. 310–16.Google Scholar
Chenery, H. B., and Syrquin, M. (1975) Patterns of Development, 1950–1970, Oxford: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.Google Scholar
Clark, J. B. (1891) ‘Distribution as Determined by a Law of Rent’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 5.3, pp. 289318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costabile, L., and Scazzieri, R. (2012) ‘Tendenze recenti del pensiero economico italiano’, in Porta, P. L. and Zamagni, V. (eds.) Il contributo italiano alla storia del pensiero. Economia, Rome: Istituto dell'Enciclopedia Italiana, pp. 739–65.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. S., and Heal, G. (1971) Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. S., and Heal, G. (1974) ‘The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources’, Review of Economic Studies, 41, pp. 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denicolò, V., and Matteuzzi, M. (1990) Public Debt and the Pasinetti Paradox’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14.3, pp. 339–44.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. (1977) ‘The Accumulation of Capital Theory’, Oxford Economic Papers, 29.1, pp. 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dore, M., Chakravarty, S., and Goodwin, R. (eds.) (1989) John von Neumann and Modern Economics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Duesenberry, J. (1952) Income, Savings and the Theory of Consumer Behavior, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Duchin, F., and Lange, G.-M. (1994) The Future of the Environment. Ecological Economics and Technological Change, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eatwell, J. (1977) The Irrelevance of Returns to Scale in Sraffa's Analysis’, Journal of Economic Literature, 15.1, pp. 61–8.Google Scholar
Eatwell, J. (1980) ‘On the Theoretical Consistency of Theories of Surplus Value’, Capital and Class, 10, pp. 155–8.Google Scholar
Eatwell, J. (1991) ‘Institutions, Efficiency, and the Theory of Economic Policy’, Social Research, 61.1, pp. 3553.Google Scholar
Eatwell, J. (2012) The Theory of Value and the Foundations of Economic Policy, In Memoriam Pierangelo Garegnani’, Contributions to Political Economy, 31.2, pp. 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eatwell, J., and Milgate, M. (2011) The Fall and Rise of Keynesian Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P. (eds.) (1987) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. (1911–1913) ‘Contributions to the Theory of Railway Rates’, Economic Journal, 21.83, pp. 346–70; 21.84, pp. 551–71; 22.86, pp. 198–218; 23.90, pp. 206–26.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. E. (1969) The Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtado, C. (1965) ‘Development and Stagnation in Latin America: a Structuralist Approach’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 1.11, pp, 159–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtado, C. (1967) Teoria e politica do desenvolvimento económico, São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional.Google Scholar
Furtado, C., and Maneschi, A. (1968) ‘Un modelo simulado de desenvolvimento e estagnaçao na America Latina, Revista brasileira de economia, 12 (September), pp. 532.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. (1960) Il capitale nelle teorie della distribuzione, Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. (1984) Value and Distribution in the Classical Economists and Marx’, Oxford Economic Papers, 36.2, pp. 291325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garegnani, P. (1987) ‘Surplus Approach to Value and Distribution’, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, London: Macmillan, vol. IV, pp. 560–74.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. (1989) ‘Some Notes on Capital, Expectations and the Analysis of Changes’, in Feiwel, G. R. (ed.) Joan Robinson and Modern Economic Theory, London: Macmillan, pp. 344–67.Google Scholar
Garegnani, P. (1990) Sraffa: Classical versus Marginalist Analysis’, in Bharadwaj, K. and Schefold, B. (eds.) Essays on Piero Sraffa: Critical Perspectives on the Revival of Classical Theory, London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 112–58.Google Scholar
Gehrke, C., and Hagemann, H. (1996) ‘Efficient Traverses and Bottlenecks: a Structural Approach’, in Landesmann, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Production and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 140–66.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971) The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, Chapter IX (‘The Analytical Representation of Process and the Economics of Production’), pp. 211–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1990) ‘Production Process and Dynamic Economics’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) The Economic Theory of Structure and Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University. Press, pp. 198226.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. M., and Landesmann, M. A. (1996) ‘Structural Change and Macroeconomic Stability in Disaggregated Models’, in Landesmann, M. A. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Production and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–87.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. M., and Punzo, L. (1987) The Dynamics of a Capitalist Economy: A Multi-Sectoral Approach, Cambridge: Polity Press and B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gossling, W. F. (1972) Productivity Trends in a Sectoral Macro-economic Model: A Study of American Agriculture and Supporting Industries, 1919–1964, London: Cass for Input-Output Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Grierson, P. (1977) The Origins of Money, London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Grilli, E. (2005) Crescita e sviluppo delle nazioni. Teorie, strategie e risultati, Turin: UTET.Google Scholar
Gualerzi, D. (2002) Consumption and Growth: Recovery and Structural Change in the US Economy, Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
Hagemann, H. (2012) ‘Luigi Pasinetti's Structural Economic Dynamics and the Employment Consequences of New Technologies’, in R. Arena and P. L. Porta (eds.) Structural Dynamics and Economic Growth, op. cit., pp. 204–17.
Hagemann, H. (2009) Hicks's Traverse Analysis. From Capital and Growth to Capital and Time’, in Hagemann, H. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Capital, Time and Transitional Dynamics, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 133–49.Google Scholar
Hagemann, H., Landesmann, M. A., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (2003a) The Economics of Structural Change, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
Hagemann, H., Landesmann, M. A., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (2003b) ‘Introduction’, in Hagemann, H., Landesmann, M.A. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), The Economics of Structural Change, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.: E. Elgar, vol. I, pp. xixlii.Google Scholar
Hagemann, H., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (2009a) Capital, Time and Transitional Dynamics, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hagemann, H., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (2009b) ‘Capital Structure and Economic Transitions: An Introductory Essay‘, in Hagemann, H. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Capital, Time and Transitional Dynamics, Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 139.Google Scholar
Harcourt, G. C. (2006) The Structure of Post-Keynesian Economics: The Core Contributions of the Pioneers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, G. C. (2012) ‘Luigi Pasinetti: the Senior Living Heir of the Cambridge School of Economics and the Last of the Great System-Builders’, in Arena, R. and Porta, P. L. (eds.) Structural Dynamics and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.137–44.Google Scholar
Harcourt, G. C., and Kenyon, P. (1976) ‘Pricing and the Investment Decision’, Kyklos, 29, pp. 449–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, G. C., and Kerr, P. (2009) Joan Robinson, London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, G. C., and Riach, P. A. (eds.) (1997) A ‘Second Edition’ of The General Theory, 2 Vol., London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harcourt, G. C., and Roncaglia, A. (eds.) (1995) Income and Employment in Theory and Practice: Essays in Memory of Athanasios Asimakopulos, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, R.F. (1939) ‘An Essay in Dynamic Theory’, Economic Journal, 49.193, pp. 1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrod, R.F. (1948), Towards a Dynamic Economics, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hennings, K. (1986) ‘The Exchange Paradigm and the Theory of Production and Distribution’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Foundations of Economics. Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford and New York: B. Blackwell, pp. 221–43.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1932) The Theory of Wages, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1969) A Theory of Economic History, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1976) ‘“Revolutions” in Economics’, in Latsis, S. J. (ed.) Method and Appraisal in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 207–18.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1977) ‘The Mainspring of Economic Growth’, in Hicks, J., Economic Perspectives. Further Essays on Money and Growth, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 119. (Nobel lecture reprinted from Swedish Journal of Economics, 1973, 75.4, pp. 336–48.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1979) The Ricardian System: A Comment’, Oxford Economic Papers, 31.1, pp. 133–4.Google Scholar
Hicks, J.R. (1985), Methods of Dynamic Economics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hill, G. (2001) ‘The Immiseration of the Landlords: Rent in a Kaldorian Theory of Income Distribution’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25.4, pp. 481–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, A. (1958) The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. (1968) ‘The Political Economy of Import-Substituting Industrialization in Latin America’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82.1, pp. 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotelling, H. (1931) ‘The Economics of Exhaustible Resources’, Journal of Political Economy, 39, pp. 137–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R.G., and Stavins, R.N. (2003) ‘Technological Change and the Environment’, in Mäler, K. G. and Vincent, J. R. (eds.) Handbook of Environmental Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, vol. I: Environmental Degradation and Institutional Response, pp. 462516.Google Scholar
Jevons, W. S. (1865) The Coal Question: An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-Mines, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kahn, R. F. (1959) ‘Exercises in the Analysis of Growth’, Oxford Economic Papers, 11.2, pp. 143–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1955–56) ‘Alternative Theories of Distribution’, Review of Economic Studies, 23.2, pp. 83100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1960) Essays on Value and Distribution, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1966) Marginal Productivity and the Macro-Economic Theories of Distribution. Comment on Samuelson and Modigliani’, Review of Economic Studies, 33.4, pp. 309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. ([1981] 1989) ‘The Role of Increasing Returns, Technical Progress and Cumulative Causation in the Theory of International Trade and Economic Growth’, Economie Appliquée, 4. Reprinted in F. Targetti and A. P. Thirlwall (eds.) (1989) Further Essays on Economic Theory and Policy, London: Duckworth, pp. 201–23.Google Scholar
Kemp, R. ( 1997) Environmental Policy and Technical Change: a Comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments, Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
Kerr, P., and Scazzieri, R. (2013) ‘Structural Economic Dynamics and the Cambridge Tradition’ in Harcourt, G. C. and Kriesler, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, vol. I, pp. 257–87.Google Scholar
Kessler, D., and Masson, A. (eds.) (1988) Modelling the Accumulation and Distribution of Wealth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1973–) The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, eds. Robinson, E. A. G. and Moggridge, D. E., London: Macmillan; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff, L. J., and Summers, L. H. (1981) ‘The Role of Intergenerational Transfers in Aggregate Capital Accumulation’, Journal of Political Economy, 89.4, pp. 706–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotlikoff, L. J., and Summers, L. H. (1988) ‘The Contribution of Intergenerational Transfers to Total Wealth: A Reply’, in Kessler, D. and Masson, A. (eds.), Modelling the Accumulation and Distribution of Wealth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 5367.Google Scholar
Kregel, J. A. (1971) Rate of Profit, Distribution and Growth: Two Views, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kregel, J. A. (1973) The Reconstruction of Political Economy: An Introduction to Post-Keynesian Economics, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kregel, J. A. (1980) Economic Dynamics and the Theory of Steady Growth: A Historical Essay on Harrod's “Knife-Edge”’, History of Political Economy, 12.1, pp. 97123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, H. D. (1978) ‘Rent Theory in a Multisectoral Model’, Oxford Economic Papers, 30.1, pp. 1637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, H. D. (ed.) (2000) Critical Essays on Piero Sraffa's Legacy in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, H. D., Pasinetti, L. L., and Salvadori, N. (eds.) (2008) Piero Sraffa: The Man and the Scholar, Exploring His Unpublished Papers, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kurz, H. D., and Salvadori, N. (2001) ‘Classical Economics and the Problem of Exhaustible Resources’, Metroeconomica, 52.3, pp. 282–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, H. D., and Salvadori, N. (eds.) (2003) The Legacy of Piero Sraffa, Volumes I and II, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1955a) ‘Toward a Theory of Economic Growth’, in Lekachman, R. (ed.), National Policy for Economic Welfare at Home and Abroad, New York: Doubleday, pp. 1285.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1955b) ‘Economic Growth and Income Inequality’, American Economic Review, 45.1, pp. 128.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1966) Modern Economic Growth: Rate, Structure, and Spread, New Haven; London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1971) Economic Growth of Nations: Total Output and Production Structure, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1973) Population, Capital and Growth, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Landes, D. S. (1969) The Unbound Prometheus: Technical Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landesmann, M.A. (1990) ‘Specification of Structure and Economic Dynamics’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) The Economic Theory of Structure and Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 95121.Google Scholar
Landesmann, M.A. and Scazzieri, R. (1993) ‘Commodity Flows and Productive Subsystems: An Essay in the Analysis of Structural Change’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Growth, Distribution and Structural Change, Houndmills and London: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 209–45.Google Scholar
Landesmann, M.A. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (1996a, 2009) Production and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landesmann, M.A. and Scazzieri, R. (1996b) ‘Introduction’ in Landesmann, M. A. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Production and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landesmann, M.A. and Scazzieri, R. (1996c) ‘Coordination of Production Processes, Subsystem Dynamics and Structural Change’, in Landesmann, M. A. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Production and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 304–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon, P. (1967) Structural Change and Growth in Capitalism, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. (1941) The Structure of the American Economy, 1919–1929, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. (1947) ‘Introduction to a Theory of the Internal Structure of Functional Relationships’, Econometrica, 15 (October), pp. 361–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontief, W. W. (1953) ‘Domestic Production and Foreign Trade. The American Capital Position Re-examined’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 97, pp. 332–9. Reprinted in Leontief (1986) Input-Output Economics, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 65–93.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. (1966) Essays in Economics. Theories and Theorizing, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. (ed.) (1977) Structure, System and Economic Policy, Proceedings of Section F of the British Association for the Advancement of Science held at the University of Lancaster 1–8 September 1976, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. ([1928] 1991) ‘The Economy as a Circular Flow’, Structural Change and Economics Dynamics, 2.1, 1991, pp. 181212. (English translation of the 1928 German original ‘Die Wirtschaft als Kreislauf’.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontief, W. W., Carter, A. P., and Petri, P. A. (1977) The Future of the World Economy. A United Nations Study, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W., Chenery, H. B. et al.. (1953) Studies in the Structure of the American Economy: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations in Input-Output Analysis, White Plains, NY: International Arts and Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W., and Duchin, F. (1986) The Future Impact of Automation on Workers, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lima, G. T. (2003) ‘Whose Saving Behaviour Really Matters in the Long Run? The Pasinetti (Irrelevance) Theorem Revisited’, Nova Economia, 13.2, pp. 1135.Google Scholar
Lombardini, S. (1993) ‘Rationality and Economic Behaviour’, in Baranzini, M. and Harcourt, G. C. (eds.) The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi Pasinetti, Basingstoke: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 384402.Google Scholar
Lombardini, S. (1996) ‘Joan Robinson's Contribution to Economic Development’, in M. C. Marcuzzo, L. L. Pasinetti and A. Roncaglia (eds.) The Economics of Joan Robinson, op. cit., pp. 135–47.
Lombardini, S., and Quadrio Curzio, A. (eds.) (1972) La distribuzione del reddito nella teoria economica, Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Lopez, R. A. (2008) Progress in Sustainable Development Research, New York: Nova Publisher.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. (1954) ‘The Classical Theory of Economic Growth’, Social Research, 21.2, pp. 127–58.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. (1965) On Economic Knowledge. Toward a Science of Political Economics, New York/Evanston: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. (1969) ‘Toward a Science of Political Economics’, in Heilbroner, R. L. (ed.) Economic Means and Social Ends. Essays in Political Economics, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 136.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. (1976) The Path of Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lydall, H. (1979) A Theory of Income Distribution, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. (1815a) The Grounds of an Opinion on the Policy of Restricting the Importation of Foreign Corn, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. (1815b) An Inquiry into the Nature and Progress of Rent and the Principles by Which it is Regulated, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. ([1798] 1993) An Essay on the Principle of Population, edited with an introduction by Gilbert, G., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maneschi, A. (1974) ‘The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor and Pasinetti Models of Growth and Distribution’, Review of Economic Studies, 41.1, pp. 149–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maneschi, A. (1993) ‘Ricardian Comparative Advantage and the Perils of the Stationary State’, in Baranzini, M. and Harcourt, G. C. (eds.) The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi Pasinetti, Basingstoke: Macmillan; New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 124–46.Google Scholar
Mangoldt, H. (1863) Grundriss der Volkswirthschaftslehre, Stuttgart: Engelhorn.Google Scholar
Marcuzzo, M. C., Pasinetti, L. L., and Roncaglia, A. (eds.) (1996) The Economics of Joan Robinson, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marengo, L., and Scazzieri, R. (2014) ‘Embedding Production: Structural Dynamics and Organizational Change’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 29.1, pp. 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marglin, S. A. (1984) Growth, Distribution and Prices, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mari, C. (2010) Kaldor, Cambridge and the Keynesian Theory of Income Distribution, PhD thesis, Lugano, Switzerland: USI.Google Scholar
Marrelli, M., and Salvadori, N. (1979) ‘The Rate of Profit in an Expanding Economy: Some Existence, Uniqueness and Stability Conditions’, Australian Economic Papers, 18.33, pp. 283–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. (1961 [1890]) Principles of Economics, 9th (variorum) edn with annotations by Guillebaud, C. W., London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Martin, J. M. (1990) ‘Energy and Technological Change. Lessons from the Last Fifteen Years’, Science, Technology and Industry Review, July, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Matuszewski, T. I. (1965) Un système rectangulaire d’échanges inter-industries à rendements non proportionnels, paper presented at the 1st World Congress of the Econometric Society, Rome.Google Scholar
Mazzanti, M., and Zoboli, R. (2005) Delinking and Environmental Kuznets Curves for Waste Indicators in Europe’, Environmental Sciences, 2.4, pp. 409–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, J. E. (1963) ‘The Rate of Profits in a Growing Economy’, Economic Journal, 73.292, pp. 665–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, J. E. (1966a) ‘The Outcome of the Pasinetti Process: A Note’, Economic Journal, 76.301 pp. 161–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, J. E. (1966b) ‘Life-Cycle Savings, Inheritance and Economic Growth’, Review of Economic Studies, 33.1, pp. 6178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meade, J. E. (1968) The Growing Economy, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Meade, J. E. (1973) ‘The Inheritance of Inequalities: Some Biological, Demographic, Social and Economic Factors’, The Proceedings of the British Academy, 59, pp. 355–81.Google Scholar
Meade, J. E. and Hahn, F. H. (1965) ‘The Rate of Profit in a Growing Economy’, Economic Journal, 75.298, pp. 445–8.Google Scholar
Meadows, D.H. et al. (1972) The Limits to Growth. The First Report to the Club of Rome, New York: Universe Book.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. ([1848] 1965) Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, ed. by Robson, J. M., with an Introduction by V. W. Braden, Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F. (1986) ‘Life Cycle, Individual Thrift, and the Wealth of Nations’, American Economic Review, 76.3, pp. 297313.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F. (1988) ‘Measuring the Contribution of Intergenerational Transfers to Total Wealth: Conceptual Issues and Empirical Findings’, in Kessler, D. and Masson, A. (eds.) Modelling the Accumulation and Distribution of Wealth, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 2152.Google Scholar
Modigliani, F., and Brumberg, R. (1954) ‘Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross-Section Data’, in Kurihara, K. K. (ed.) Post-Keynesian Economics, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 388436.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (1995) ‘Environmental Crises and Technological Change’, in Curzio, A. Quadrio and Zoboli, R. (eds.) Science, Economics and Technology for the Environment, Milan: Cariplo Foundation for Scientific Research, pp. 223–43.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2002) The Gifts of Athena. Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mongiovi, G. (2001) The Cambridge Tradition in Economics: An Interview With G. C. Harcourt’, Review of Political Economy, 13.4, pp. 503–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mongiovi, G., and Petri, F. (eds.) (1999) Value, Distribution and Capital: Essays in Honour of P. Garegnani, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Muldrew, C. (2011) Food, Energy and the Creation of Industriousness. Work and Material Culture in Agrarian England, 1550–1780, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrdal, G. (1953) The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul (1st edn 1930).Google Scholar
Nazzani, E. (1872) Sulla rendita fondiaria, Forlì: Tipografia Sociale Democratica.Google Scholar
Nell, E. J. (1998) The General Theory of Transformational Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, J. (1937) ‘Über ein ökonomisches Gleichungssystem und eine Verallgemeinerung des Brouwerschen Fixpunktsatzes’, in Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums, vol. VIII, Vienna, pp. 7383. (English translation as ‘A Model of General Economic Equilibrium’, Review of Economic Studies, 1945/6, 13.1, pp. 1–9.)Google Scholar
Nicola, P. C. (2012) Efficiency and Equity in Welfare Economics, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Nicola, P. C., Quadrio Curzio, A., and Rotondi, C. (2010) Distribution and Growth, Technology and Development. Reflections on Nino Andreatta's Theoretical Analysis’, Rivista Internazionale di Scienze sociali, 118.2, pp. 155–97.Google Scholar
Nurkse, R. (1953) Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries, Oxford: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
OECD (2002) Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth, Paris: OECD.
Oppenheimer, P. M. (1982) ‘Possible and Desirable Roles for Gold in the International Monetary System: Reconsideration and Proposals’, in Curzio, A. Quadrio (ed.) The Gold Problem. Economic Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 187203.Google Scholar
Panico, C. (1985) ‘Market Forces and the Relationship between the Rate of Interest and the Rate of Profits’, Contributions to Political Economy, 4.1, pp. 3760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panico, C., and Salvadori, N. (eds.) (1993) Post Keynesian Theory of Growth and Distribution, Aldershot: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
Parisi, D., and Rotondi, C. (1999) ‘Keynesian Elements in a Long-Term Analysis: Two Views of Two Influencial Pre- and Postwar Italian Economists’, in Pasinetti, L. L. and Schefold, B. (eds.) The Impact of Keynes on Economics in the 20th Century, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.: E. Elgar, pp. 153–9.Google Scholar
Park, M. S. (1994) ‘Long Period’, in Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. (eds.) The Elgar Companion to Radical Political Economy, Aldershot and Hants: E. Elgar, pp. 249–55.Google Scholar
Park, M.-S. (1997) ‘Accumulation, Capacity Utilisation and Distribution’, Contributions to Political Economy, 16.1, pp. 87101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1959) ‘On Concepts and Measures of Changes in Productivity’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 41.3, pp. 270–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1960) ‘A Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System’, Review of Economic Studies, 27.2, pp. 7898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1962a) ‘Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth’, Review of Economic Studies, 29.4, pp. 267–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1962b) ‘A Multi-Sector Model of Economic Growth’, a PhD dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Economics and Politics of the University of Cambridge, September.
Pasinetti, L. L. (1964/5) ‘Causalità e interdipendenza nell'analisi econometrica e nella teoria economica’, in Annali dell'Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore 1964–65, Milan: Vita e Pensiero, pp. 231–50.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1965) A New Theoretical Approach to the Problems of Economic Growth, Vatican City: Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1966a) ‘The Rate of Profit in a Growing Economy: A Reply’, Economic Journal, 76.301, pp. 158–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1966b) New Results in an Old Framework: Comment on Samuelson and Modigliani’, Review of Economic Studies, 33.4, pp. 303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1973) ‘The Notion of Vertical Integration in Economic Analysis’, Metroeconomica, pp. 129. Reprinted in L. L. Pasinetti (ed.) (1980) Essays on the Theory of Joint Production, London: Macmillan, pp. 16–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1974a) Growth and Income Distribution. Essays in Economic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1974b) ‘The Rate of Profit in an Expanding Economy’, in L. L. Pasinetti, Growth and Income Distribution. Essays in Economic Theory, op. cit., pp. 121–46.
Pasinetti, L. L. (1977a) Lectures on the Theory of Production, London: Macmillan; New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1977b) Reply to Professor Stiglitz’, in Morishima, M., ‘Pasinetti's Growth and Distribution Revisited’, Journal of Economic Literature, 15.1, pp. 57–8.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (ed.) (1980) Essays on the Theory of Joint Production, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1981) Structural Change and Economic Growth: A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1983) ‘The Accumulation of Capital’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 7.3–4, pp. 405–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1986a) ‘Theory of Value – A Source of Alternative Paradigms in Economic Analysis’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.), Foundations of Economics, Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford and New York: B. Blackwell, pp. 409–31.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1986b) Sraffa's Circular Process and the Concept of Vertical Integration’, Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach, 2, pp. 316.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1988) ‘Growing Sub-Systems, Vertically Hyper-Integrated Sectors and the Labour Theory of Value’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 12, pp. 125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1993) Structural Economic Dynamics. A Theory of the Economic Consequences of Human Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1999) ‘Economic Theory and Technical Progress’, Economic Issues, 4.2, pp. 118.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (2007) Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians. A ‘Revolution in Economics’ to be Accomplished, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (2011a) La “rivoluzione in economia” di Keynes e i post-Keynesiani’, in Gli economisti postkeynesiani di Cambridge e l'Italia, Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Atti dei Convegni Lincei, no. 261, pp. 1329.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (2011b) ‘Considerazioni conclusive con alcune ipotesi contro-fattuali sulla presente crisi’, in Gli economisti postkeynesiani di Cambridge e l'Italia, Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Atti dei Convegni Lincei, no. 261, pp. 433–57.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (2012a) ‘Growth and Structural Change: Perspectives for the Future’, in Arena, R. and Porta, P. L. (eds.) Structural Dynamics and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 276–82.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (2012b) ‘Second Afterword: the Significance of Structural Economic Dynamics’, in Arena, R. and Porta, P. L. (eds.) Structural Dynamics and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 283–7.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L., and Scazzieri, R. (1987) ‘Structural Economic Dynamics’, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, London: Macmillan, vol. IV, pp. 525–8.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L., and Solow, R. M. (eds.) (1994) Economic Growth and the Structure of Long Term Development, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pellizzari, F. (1985) La teoria economica delle risorse naturali, Milan: Angeli.Google Scholar
Perrings, C. (1987) Economy and Environment: A Theoretical Essay on the Interdependence of Economic and Environmental Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perroux, F. (1939) Cours d’économie politique, 2nd edn, Paris: Domat Montchrétien.Google Scholar
Poni, C., and Scazzieri, R. (2007) ‘Environmental Crisis and Property Rights: Historical Contexts and Theoretical Frameworks’, in Prinz, A., Steenge, A. E. and Schmidt, J. (eds.) The Rules of the Game: Institutions, Law and Economics, Berlin: LINT Verlag, pp. 81101.Google Scholar
Popp, D. (2002) ‘Induced Innovation and Energy Prices’, American Economic Review, 92.1, pp. 160–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popp, D. (2004), R&D Subsidies and Climate Policy: is There a “Free Lunch”?, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 10880.
Prebisch, R. (1971) Change and Development – Latin America's Great Task; Report Submitted to the Inter-American Development Bank, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Prodi, R., and Quadrio Curzio, A. (2012) ‘Gold in the Past and EuroUnionBond for the Future’, Economia Politica. Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, 29.3, pp. 295303.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1965) ‘Reddito e saggio di interesse nelle decisioni di consumo e risparmio nell'ipotesi di comportamento razionale’, in Forte, F. and Lombardini, S. (eds.) Saggi di economia, Milan: Giuffrè, pp. 352.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1967) Rendita e distribuzione in un modello economico plurisettoriale [Rent and Distribution in a Multi-sectoral Economic Model], Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1972) ‘La distribuzione del reddito nella teoria economica: un commento’, in Lombardini, S. and Curzio, A. Quadrio (eds.) La distribuzione del reddito nella teoria economica, Milan: Franco Angeli, pp. 1349.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1975) Accumulazione del capitale e rendita [Accumulation of Capital and Rent], Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1977) ‘Rendita, distribuzione del reddito, ordine di efficienza e di redditività’, in Pasinetti, L. L. (ed.) Contributi alla teoria della produzione congiunta, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 301–27.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1980) ‘Rent, Income Distribution and Orders of Efficiency and Rentability’, in Pasinetti, L. L. (ed.) Essays on the Theory of Joint Production, London: Macmillan, pp. 219–40. Reprinted in H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori (eds.) (2003) The Legacy of Piero Sraffa, Cheltenham: E. Elgar, vol. II, pp. 311–41.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1981) ‘Un diagramma dell'oro tra demonetizzazione e rimonetizzazione’, Rivista internazionale di scienze economiche e commerciali, 10–11, pp. 915–40.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1982a) ‘Materie prime: identità di un problema e finalità di un rapporto’, Materie Prime, 1, pp. 912.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (ed.) (1982b) The Gold Problem. Economic Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1983) ‘Primary Commodity Prices, Exhaustible Resources and International Monetary Relations: Alternative Explanations’, in J. A. Kregel (ed.) Distribution, Effective Demand and International Economic Relations, op. cit., London: Macmillan, pp. 142–52.
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1985) ‘Dal rifiuto del numerario aureo ai prezzi quasi ufficiali dell'oro’, Rivista internazionale di scienze economiche e commerciali, October–November, pp. 965–87.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1986) ‘Technological Scarcity: An Essay on Production and Structural Change’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Foundations of Economics. Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford and New York: B. Blackwell, pp. 311–38.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1987a) ‘Produzione ed efficienza con tecnologie globali. Parte I’, Economia Politica, 4 (1), pp. 1132.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1987b) ‘Land Rent’, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.) The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, London: Macmillan, vol. III, pp. 118–21.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1988) ‘Le «scarsità relative» nella storia della teoria economica e rilevanza attuale’, in Guerci, C.M. and Zanetti, G. (a cura di), Sviluppo economico e vincolo energetico, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 3953.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1990) ‘Rent, Distribution and Economic Structure: a Collection of Essays’, Quaderni IDSE, 1, Milan: Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche-CNR (this volume includes Quadrio Curzio 1980, 1986, 1987a, 1987b).Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1991) ‘Technology and Natural Resources in the Growth of Economies’, Innovazione e Materie Prime, special issue, pp. 116.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1993a) ‘On Economic Science, Its Tools and Economic Reality’, in M. Baranzini and G. C. Harcourt (eds.) The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi Pasinetti, op. cit., pp. 246–71.
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1993b) ‘Distribuzione della ricchezza e del reddito’, Enciclopedia delle Scienze Sociali, Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana Treccani, pp. 194207.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1993c) ‘Innovation, Primary Commodities and the World Economy: A Survey on Twelve Years of Contributions through Two Journals’, Innovazione e Materie Prime, II, 2–3, pp. 520.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1996) ‘Production and Efficiency with Global Technologies’, in Landesmann, M. A. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Production and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–26.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1997) ‘Rendita’, in Enciclopedia delle scienze sociali, Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana, Treccani, vol. VII, Rome: Istituto dell'Enciclopedia Italiana, pp. 395407.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1998) ‘Rent’, in Kurz, H. and Salvadori, N. (eds.) The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics, vol. L-Z, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.: E. Elgar, pp. 289–93.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1999a) ‘Historical and Theoretical Introduction to Rent, Resources, and Technologies’ in Curzio, A. Quadrio and Pellizzari, F. (eds.) Rent, Resources, Technologies, Berlin: Springer, pp. 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1999b) ‘Conclusions and Further Lines of Research’, in Curzio, A. Quadrio and Pellizzari, F. (eds.) Rent, Resources, Technologies, Berlin: Springer, pp. 233–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (2005) ‘Risorse scarse e tecnologia’, in Pragmatica, special issue, August, pp. iviii.
Quadrio Curzio, A. (2007) Economisti ed economia. Per un'Italia europea: paradigmi tra il XVIII e il XX secolo, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (2011a) ‘Risorse e dinamica economica, tecnologia e rendite’, in Gli economisti postkeynesiani di Cambridge e l'Italia, Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Atti dei Convegni Lincei, no. 261, pp. 409–32.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (2011b) ‘Resources and Economic Dynamics, Technology and Rents’, Quaderni Cranec, Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Antonelli, G. (eds.) (1988) The Agro-Technological System Towards 2000, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Quadrio-Curzio, A., and Fortis, M. (1996) ‘Growth and Productive Structure: A Medium-Term Perspective’, in Colombo, B., Demeny, P. and Perutz, M. F. (eds.), Resources and Population: Natural, Institutional and Demographic Dimensions of Development, Oxford: Clarendon Press-Pontificia Academia Scientiarum, pp. 137–56.Google Scholar
Quadrio-Curzio, A., and Fortis, M. (eds.) (2002) Complexity and Industrial Clusters. Dynamics and Models in Theory and Pratice, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio-Curzio, A., and Fortis, M. (2005a) ‘Introduction – Research, Technology, Innovation: Analysis and Cases’ in Curzio, A. Quadrio and Fortis, M. (eds.) Research and Technological Innovation: The Challenge for a New Europe, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, pp. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio-Curzio, A., and Fortis, M. (eds.) (2005b) Research and Technological Innovation: the Challenge for a New Europe, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., Fortis, M., and Zoboli, R. (1994) ‘Innovation, Resources and Economic Growth. Changing Interactions in the World Economy’, in Curzio, A. Quadrio, Fortis, M. and Zoboli, R. (eds.) Innovation, Resources and Economic Growth, Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Pellizzari, F. (1981) ‘La teoria economica delle risorse naturali’, Energia, 2, pp. 1429.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Pellizzari, F. (1991) ‘Structural Rigidities and Dynamic Choice of Technologies’, Rivista internazionale di scienze economiche e commerciali, 38.6–7, pp. 481517.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Pellizzari, F. (1996a) Risorse, tecnologie, rendita, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Pellizzari, F. (1996b) ‘Distribuzione dinamica del reddito e risorse scarse’, in Cozzi, T., Curzio, A. Quadrio, Nicola, P. C. and Pasinetti, L. L. (eds.) Benessere, equilibrio e sviluppo. Studi in onore di Siro Lombardini, vol. III, Milan: Vita e Pensiero, pp. 203–54.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Pellizzari, F. (1998) ‘Extensive and Intensive Rent’, in Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. (eds.) The Elgar Companion to Classical Economics (ECCE), Cheltenham: E. Elgar, pp. 279–83.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Pellizzari, F. (1999) Rent, Resources, Technologies, Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Pellizzari, F. (2004) ‘Rent, Technology, and the Environment’, in Arena, R. and Salvadori, N. (eds.) Money, Credit and the Role of the State. Essays in Honour of Augusto Graziani, Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 335–48.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., Pellizzari, F., and Zoboli, R. (2008) ‘Technological Innovation, Relative Scarcity, Investments’, Encyclopaedia of Hydrocarbons, Rome: ENI and Istituto per l'Enciclopedia Italiana Treccani, IV, pp. 1122.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., Pellizzari, F., and Zoboli, R. (2011) Natural Resources and Technologies, Cranec Working Paper, Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., Prosperetti, L., and Zoboli, R. (eds.) ( 1994) The Management of Municipal Solid Waste in Europe: Economic, Technological and Environmental Perspectives, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Rotondi, C. (eds.) (2013) Un economista eclettico. Distribuzione, tecnologie e sviluppo nel pensiero di Nino Andreatta, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Rotondi, C. (eds.) (2015) Ricardo on Gold’, in Kurz, H. D. and Salvadori, N. (eds.) The Elgar Companion to David Ricardo, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.USA: E. Elgar, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (1977–1982) Protagonisti del pensiero economico, 4 vols., Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (1983) Sui momenti costitutivi dell'economia politica, vol. II of Protagonisti del pensiero economico, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (1986) ‘The Exchange-Production Duality and the Dynamics of Economic Knowledge’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Foundations of Economics. Structures of Inquiry and Economiuc Theory, Oxford and New York: B. Blackwell, pp. 377407.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (1990) ‘Profili di dinamica economica strutturale: introduzione’, in Curzio, A. Quadrio and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Dinamica economica strutturale, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 1151.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) (2008) ‘Historical Stylizations and Monetary Theory’, in R. Scazzieri, A. Sen and S. Zamagni (eds.), Markets, Money and Capital: Hicksian Economics for the Twenty-First Century, op. cit., pp. 185–203.
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Zoboli, R. (eds.) (1995a) Ambiente e dinamica globale. Scienza, tecnologia ed economia a confronto, Il Mulino: Bologna.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Zoboli, R. (eds.) (1995b) Science, Economics and Technology for the Environment, Milan: Fondazione Cariplo per la Ricerca Scientifica.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Zoboli, R. (eds.) (1998) ‘The Costs of Sustainability’, in Giampietro, M. et al. (eds.) Il contributo italiano alla realizzazione della “Carta della terra” nel cinquantesino anniversario delle Nazioni Unite, Proceedings of the International Conference, Rome: Accademia Nazionale delle Scienze detta dei XL, pp. 97110.Google Scholar
Quesnay, F. ([1758] 1958) ‘Maximes générales de gouvernement economique d'un royaume agricole’, in François Quesnay et la Physiocratie, Paris: Institut National d’Études Démographiques, pp. 949–76.Google Scholar
Quesnay, F. ([1759] 1972) Quesnay's Tableau Economique, edited with new material, translations and notes by Kuczynski, M. and Meek, R. L., London: Macmillan; New York: A. M. Kelley, for the Royal Economic Society and the American Economic Association.Google Scholar
Rae, D.W. and Taylor, M. (1970) The Analysis of Political Cleavages, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. (1815) An Essay on Profits, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. (1951) On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, vol. I of The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Sraffa, P. ed. with the collaboration of Dobb, M. H., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1st edn 1817; 2nd edn 1819, 3rd edn 1821).Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. (1951–73) The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, 11 vols., Sraffa, P. ed. with the collaboration of Dobb, M. H., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. (1932) An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. V. (1956) The Accumulation of Capital, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. V. (1962) Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, R. (1987) ‘Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade’, The American Political Science Review, 81.4, pp. 1121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (1977) ‘The Sraffian Revolution’, in Weintraub, S. (ed.) Modern Economic Thought, Oxford: B. Blackwell, pp. 163–77.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (1978) Sraffa and the Theory of Prices, New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, A. (2005) The Wealth of Ideas: A History of Economic Thought, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (1969) ‘The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 18.1, pp. 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (1994) ‘Energy Efficient Technologies, Past and Future Perspectives’, in Curzio, A. Quadrio, Fortis, M. and Zoboli, M. (eds.) Innovation, Resources and Economic Growth, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenberg, N. (1996) ‘The Impact of Technological Change on Resources for Growing Population’, in Colombo, B. et al. (eds.) Resources and Population, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 113–25.Google Scholar
Ruttan, V. W. (2002), ‘Sources of Technical Change: Induced Innovation, Evolutionary Theory and Path Dependence’, in Gruebler, A. et al. (eds.) Technological Change and the Environment, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 939.Google Scholar
Salvadori, N. (1996) ‘“Productivity Curves” in the Accumulation of Capital’, in Marcuzzo, M. C., Pasinetti, L. L. and Roncaglia, A. (eds.) The Economics of Joan Robinson, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 232–48.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A., and Modigliani, F. (1966a) ‘The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models’, Review of Economic Studies, 33.4, pp. 269301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A., and Modigliani, F. (1966b) ‘Reply to Pasinetti and Robinson’, Review of Economic Studies, 33.4, pp. 321–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sardoni, C., and Kriesler, P. (eds.) (1999) Keynes, Post-Keynesianism and Political Economy: Essays in Honour of Geoff Harcourt, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1981) Efficienza produttiva e livelli di attivita’, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1982) ‘Scale and Efficiency in Models of Production’, in Baranzini, M. (ed.) Advances in Economic Theory, Oxford: B. Blackwell, pp.1942.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1983) Economic Dynamics and Structural Change: A Comment on Pasinetti’, Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali, 30.1, pp. 7390.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1990) ‘Vertical Integration in Economic Theory’, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, 13.1, pp. 2046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1993a) A Theory of Production: Tasks, Processes and Technical Practices, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1993b) ‘Action, Processes and Economic Theory’, in Heertje, A. (ed.) The Makers of Modern Economics, vol. I, Aldershot, UK and Brookfield, Vt.: E. Elgar, pp. 84114.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1994) ‘Models of Long-Term Development: Comment’, in Pasinetti, L. L. and Solow, R. M. (eds.) Economic Growth and the Structure of Long Term Development, London: Macmillan, pp. 171–5.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1996a) ‘Introduction to Pasinetti's Structural Economic Dynamics: A Symposium’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 7.2, pp. 123–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1996b) ‘The Accumulation of Capital and Structural Economic Dynamics’, in M. C. Marcuzzo, L. L. Pasinetti and A. Roncaglia (eds.) The Economics of Joan Robinson, op. cit., pp. 174–87.
Scazzieri, R. (1998) ‘Hierarchy of Production Activities and Decomposition of Structural Change: An Essay in the Theory of Economic History’, in Hagemann, H. and Kurz, H. D. (eds.) Political Economics in Retrospect. Essays in Memory of Adolph Lowe, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.: E. Elgar, pp. 195207.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1999) ‘A Theory of Resilient Flow–Fund Linkages’, in Mayumi, K. and Gowdy, J. (eds.) Bioeconomics and Sustainability, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.: E. Elgar, pp. 229–56.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2007) Paolo Sylos Labini: A Memoir’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 18.2, pp. 279–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2009) ‘Traverse Analysis and Methods of Economic Dynamics’, in Hagemann, H. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Capital, Time and Transitional Dynamics, Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge, pp. 96132.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2010) Douglass C. North's Understanding the Process of Economic Change: Analytical Principles and Historical Narratives’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 21.2, pp. 135–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2011) ‘Structural Economic Dynamics: Looking Back and Forging Ahead’, in Gli economisti postkeynesiani di Cambridge e l'Italia, Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Atti dei Convegni Lincei, no. 261, pp. 205–33.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2012a) ‘The Concept of “Natural Economic System”: A Tool for Structural Analysis and an Instrument for Policy Design’, in R. Arena and P. L. Porta (eds.) Structural Dynamics and Economic Growth, op. cit., pp. 218–40.
Scazzieri, R. (2012b) ‘Structural Economic Dynamics: Methods, Theories and Decisions’, in Krämer, H. M., Kurz, H. and Trautwein, H.-M. (eds.) Macroeconomics and the History of Economic Thought: Essays in Honour of Harald Hagemann, Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge, pp. 314–28.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2014) ‘A Structural Theory of Increasing Returns’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 29.2, pp. 7588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scazzieri, R., Sen, A., and Zamagni, S. (eds.) (2008) Markets, Money and Capital: Hicksian Economics for the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R., and Zamagni, S. (2008) ‘Between Theory and History: on the Identity of Hicks's Economics’, in R. Scazzieri, A. Sen and S. Zamagni (eds.), Markets, Money and Capital. Hicksian Economics for the Twenty-First Century, op. cit., pp. 1–37.
Schumpeter, J.A. (1949) The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1962) ‘The Architecture of Complexity’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106.6, pp. 467–82. doi:10.2307/985254.Google Scholar
Simon, H.A., and Ando, A. (1961) ‘Aggregation of Variables in Dynamic Systems’, Econometrica, 29.2, pp. 111–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skott, P. (1989) Conflict and Effective Demand in Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skott, P. (1995) ‘Cumulative Causation and the “New” Theories of Economic Growth’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 17.3, pp. 381402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, E. G., and Teixeira, A. A. C., (2008) ‘Surveying Structural Change: Seminal Contributions and a Bibliometric Account’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19.4, pp. 273300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. ([1776] 1976) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, General Editors Campbell, R. H. and Skinner, A. S., Textual Editor Todd, W. B., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1956) ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70.1, pp. 6594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1974a) ‘Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: the Humbug Production Function: A Comment’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 56, p. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1974b) ‘Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources’, Review of Economic Studies, 41.1, pp. 2945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1926) ‘The Laws of Returns under Competitive Conditions’, Economic Journal, 36.144, pp. 535–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1951) ‘Introduction’ to The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, ed. Sraffa, P. with the collaboration of Dobb, M. H., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, vol. I, pp. xiiilxii.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1960) Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. ([1925] 1998) ‘On the Relations between Cost and Quantity Produced’, in Pasinetti, L.L. (ed.) Italian Economic Papers, Bologna: Il Mulino; Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 323–63.Google Scholar
Steenge, A. E., and van Den Berg, R. (2007) Transcribing the Tableau Économique: Input-Output Analysis à la Quesnay, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 29.3, pp. 331–58.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. J. (1941) Production and Distribution Theories, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (1974) ‘Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths’, Review of Economic Studies, 41, pp. 123–37.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (1979) ‘Prices and Income Distribution in Manufacturing Industry’, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2.1, pp. 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (1982) ‘On the Instability of Raw Materials Prices and the Problem of Gold’, in Curzio, A. Quadrio (ed.) The Gold Problem. Economic Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.163–70.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (1984) The Forces of Economic Growth and Decline, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sylos Labini, P. (1993) ‘Long-Run Changes in the Wage and Price Mechanisms of the Processes of Growth’, in M. Baranzini and G. C. Harcourt (eds.), The Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations: Growth, Distribution and Structural Change: Essays in Honour of Luigi Pasinetti, op. cit., pp. 311–47.
Sylos Labini, P. (1994) ‘Wages, Profits and Theories of Growth: Comment’, in L. L. Pasinetti and R. M. Solow (eds.) Economic Growth and the Structure of Long Term Development, op. cit., pp. 112–15.
Syrquin, M. (1988) ‘Patterns of Structural Change’, in Chenery, H. and Srinivasan, T. N. (eds.) Handbook of Development Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, vol. 1, pp. 203–73.Google Scholar
Syrquin, M., and Chenery, H. B. (1989a) Patterns of Development, 1950 to 1983, Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Syrquin, M., and Chenery, H. B. (1989b) ‘Three Decades of Industrialization’, The World Bank Economic Review, 3, pp. 145–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Targetti, F., and Thirlwall, A. P. (eds.) (1983) Further Essays on Economic Theory and Policy, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Teixeira, J. R. (1996) ‘Structural Economic Dynamics: Review Article’, Revue Tiers-Monde, 36, pp. 461–2.Google Scholar
Teixeira, J. R., and Sarquis, S. (1996) ‘Evaluating Gains from International Relations According to Structural Dynamics – A Pasinettian Approach’, Texte de recherche, 32, IEDES, Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris.Google Scholar
Teixeira, J. R., Sugahara, R., and Baranzini, M. (1998) On Micro-Foundations for the Kaldor-Pasinetti Growth Model with Taxation and Bequest’, Anais do XXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia, 1, pp. 505–18. Reprinted (2002) in the Brazilian Journal of Business Economics, 2.1, pp. 9–23.Google Scholar
Tobin, J. (1960) ‘Towards a General Kaldorian Theory of Distribution’, Review of Economic Studies, 27.2, pp. 119–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tugan Baranovsky, M. I. ([1894, 1900] 1913) Les crises industrielles en Angleterre, translated from the second Russian edition by J. Schapiro, Paris: Giard et Brière.Google Scholar
Turgot, A. R. J. ([1768] 1808) ‘Observations sur le mémoire de M. de Saint-Péravy en faveur de l'impôt indirect’, in Oeuvres de Turgot, Paris: Imprimerie De Delance, IV, pp. 312–43.Google Scholar
Walsh, V., and Gram, H. (1980) Classical and Neoclassical Theories of General Equilibrium, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
West, E. (1815) Essay on the Application of Capital to Land, London: T. Underwood.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. (1893) Über Wert, Kapital und Rente nach den neueren nationalökonomischen Theorien, Jena: Fischer. (English translation as Value, Capital and Rent, London: Allen & Unwin, 1954.)Google Scholar
Wicksteed, P. H. (1894) An Essay on the Coordination of the Laws of Distribution, London: Macmillan. Reprinted 1932, London: The London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Wicksteed, P. H. (1933) The Common Sense of Political Economy, London: G. Routledge & Sons (1st edn 1910).Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wood, A. (1975) A Theory of Profits, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, A. (1978) A Theory of Pay, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woodfield, A., and McDonald, J. (1979) On Relative Income Shares in the Pasinetti and Samuelson-Modigliani Systems’, Economic Journal, 89.354, pp. 329–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. (1962) ‘The Supply of Raw Materials in the Industrial Revolution’. Economic History Review, 15.1, pp. 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. (1987) ‘The Classical Economists and the Industrial Revolution’, in Wrigley, E.A., People, Cities and Wealth: the Transformation of Traditional Society, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 2145.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. (1988) Continuity, Chance and Change: the Character of the Industrial Revolution in England, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. (1991) ‘Energy Availability and Agricultural Productivity’, in Campbell, B. M. S. and Overeton, M. (eds.) Land, Labour and Lifestock: Historical Studies in European Agricultural Productivity, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 323–39.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E.A. (1994) ‘The Classical Economists, the Stationary State, and the Industrial Revolution’, in Snooks, G.D. (ed.), Was the Industrial Revolution Necessary? , London: Routledge, pp. 2742.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E.A. (2006) ‘The Transition to an Advanced Organic Economy: Half a Millenium of English Agriculture’, Economic History Review, 59, pp. 435–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, E.A. (2010) Energy and the English Industrial Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamagni, S. (1984) On Ricardo and Hayek Effects in a Fixwage Model of Traverse’, Oxford Economic Papers, 36 (Supplement), pp. 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z. (2000) ‘Decoupling China's Carbon Emissions Increase from Economic Growth: An Economic Analysis and Policy Implications’, World Development, 28.4, pp. 739–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoboli, R. (1996) ‘Technology and Changing Population Structure: Environmental Implications for the Advanced Countries’, Dynamis-Quaderni, 6, Milan: IDSE-CNR.Google Scholar