Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-rbfsf Total loading time: 1.138 Render date: 2022-06-25T14:48:40.812Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Part II - Structural dynamics: resources and multi-sectoral linkages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

Mauro L. Baranzini
Affiliation:
Università della Svizzera Italiana, Switzerland
Claudia Rotondi
Affiliation:
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano
Roberto Scazzieri
Affiliation:
Università di Bologna and University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Duchin, F. (2009), Input-output Economics and Material flows, in Suh, S. (ed.), Handbook of Input-Output Economics in Industrial Ecology, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 2341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, T. C. (ed.) (1951) Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Monograph 13, Wiley.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. (1970) ‘Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 52(3), pp. 262–71.Google Scholar
Miller, R. E., and Blair, P. D. (2009) Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, 2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, S., and Kondo, Y. (2009) Waste Input-Output Analysis; Concepts and Application to Industrial Ecology, Amsterdam: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuyama, Y. (2007) ‘Economic Modeling for Disaster Impact Analysis: Past, Present, and Future’, Introduction to Economic Modeling for Disaster Impact Analysis, special issue of Economic Systems Research, vol. 19(2): pp. 115124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1977) Lectures on the Theory of Production, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. and Pellizzari, F. (1999) Rent, Resources, Technologies, Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. and Scazzieri, R. (1986) ‘The Exchange-Production Duality and the Dynamics of Economic Knowledge’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Foundations of Economics, Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford and New York: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Seton, F., (1977) ‘The Question of Ideological Obstacles to Rational Price Setting in Communist Countries’, Ch. 2 in Abouchar, Alan (ed.) The Socialist Price Mechanism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1960) Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steenge, A. E. (2004) ‘Social Cost in the Leontief Environmental Model: Rules and Limits to Policy’, in Dietzenbacher, E. and Lahr, M.L. (eds.) Wassily Leontief and Input-Output Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steenge, A. E. and Serrano, M. (2012) ‘Income Distributions in Input-Output Models’, Economic Systems Research, vol. 24(4): pp. 391412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavazzuti, F., and D'Adda, C. (1972) ‘Imposta sul valore aggiunto e prezzi: un'applicazione dello schema input-output’, Note economiche, 5–6, pp. 176–87.Google Scholar
D'Adda, C. (1966) La funzione del consumo nel modello di Leontief (a report to the Italian National Research Council, Study Group on Distribution, Technical Progress and Economic Development), mimeo.Google Scholar
D'Adda, C. (1989) ‘An Economy of Industries and Its Aggregate Representation’, BNL Quarterly Review, 168, pp. 97107.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1936) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. (1941) The Structure of American Economy 1919–1939, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. (1966) ‘Input-Output Analysis 1965’ in Leontief, W. W. Input-Output Economics, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 134–55.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1867) Das Kapital, Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, Hamburg: Verlag von Otto Meisner.Google Scholar
Mathur, P. N. (1964) ‘Output and Investment for Exponential Growth in Consumption – An Alternative Formulation: and Derivation of Their Technological Upper Limits’, Review of Economic Studies, 31.1, pp. 73–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morishima, M. (1958) ‘Prices, Interest and Profits in a Dynamic Leontief System’, Econometrica, 26.3, pp. 358–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1965) ‘A New Theoretical Approach to the Problems of Economic Growth’, Vatican City: Pontificia Accademia Scientiarum Scripta Varia, 28, Part. II, pp. 1–126.
Pasinetti, L. L. (1973) ‘The Notion of Vertical Integration in Economic Analysis’, Metroeconomica, 25, pp. 129. Reprinted in L. L. Pasinetti (ed.) (1980) Essays on the Theory of Joint Production, London: Macmillan; New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L.L. (1977) Lectures on the Theory of Production, London: Macmillan; New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1980) ‘Rent, Income Distribution and Orders of Efficiency and Rentability’, in Pasinetti, L. L., (ed.), Essays on the Theory of Joint Production, London, Macmillan, pp. 219–40. Reprinted in H. D. Kurz and N. Salvadori (eds.), The Legacy of Piero Sraffa, Cheltenham, UK: E. Elgar, 2003, vol. II, pp. 311–41.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1986) ‘Technological Scarcity: An Essay on Production and Structural Change’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Foundations of Economics. Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford and New York, Basil Blackwell, pp. 311–38.Google Scholar
Duchin, F. (2005) ‘A World Trade Model Based on Comparative Advantage with m Regions, n Goods, and k Factors’, Economic Systems Research, 17.2, pp. 141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchin, F., and Levine, S. H. (2011) ‘Sectors May Use Multiple Technologies Simultaneously: The Rectangular Choice-of-Technology Model with Binding Factor Constraints’, Economic Systems Research, 23.3, pp. 281302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchin, F., and Levine, S. H. (2012) ‘The Rectangular Sector-by-Technology Model: Not Every Economy Produces Every Product and Some Products May Rely on Several Technologies Simultaneously’, Journal of Economic Structures, 1.3, pp. 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchin, F., and Szyld, D. (1985) ‘A Dynamic Input-Output Model with Assured Positive Output’, Metroeconomica, 37, pp. 269–82. Reprinted in H. Kurz, C. Lager and E. Dietzenbacher (eds.) Input-Output Analysis, Cheltenham: E. Elgar.Google Scholar
Kondo, Y., and Nakamura, S. (2005) ‘Waste Input-Output Linear Programming Model with Its Application to Eco-Efficiency Analysis’, Economic Systems Research, 17.4, pp. 393408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontief, W. (1953) Studies in the Structure of the American Economy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. (1970) ‘The Dynamic Inverse’ in Carter, A. and Brody, A. (eds.) Contributions to Input-Output Analysis: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 1746.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. (1971) ‘Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts’, American Economic Review, 61.1, pp. 17. (Presidential address delivered at the eighty-third meeting of The American Economic Association, Detroit, Michigan, December 1970.)Google Scholar
Leontief, W., Carter, A., and Petri, P. (1977) The Future of the World Economy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, S., and Kondo, Y. (2002) ‘Input-Output Analysis of Waste Management’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 6.1, pp. 3963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, S., and Kondo, Y. (2009) Waste Input-Output Analysis: Concepts and Application to Industrial Ecology, Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuters (2010) ‘Chile Bill Ups Mine Royalty from 2018’, Mining Weekly, September 1, www.miningweekly.com/article/chile-bill-ups-mine-royalty-from-2018-2010-09-01, accessed 15 September 2010.
Strømman, A., and Duchin, F. (2006) ‘A World Trade Model with Bilateral Trade Based on Comparative Advantage’, Economic Systems Research, 18.3, pp. 281–97.Google Scholar
United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2010) Mineral Commodity Summaries. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey.
World Bank (2012) Renewable Energy Desalination: An Emerging Solution to Close the Water Gap in the Middle East and North Africa, Washington, DC.
Zacharia, J. (2010) ‘Offshore Gas Discoveries in Israel Prompt Squabbling over Royalties’, The Washington Post, 29 August, 3 pp., www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/28/AR2010082803523.html, accessed 15 September 2010.
Bortis, H. (1997) Institutions, Behaviour and Economic Theory – A Contribution to Classical-Keynesian Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (paperback edn 2006).Google Scholar
Bortis, H. (2003) ‘Keynes and the Classics – Notes on the Monetary Theory of Production’, in Rochon, L.-P. and Rossi, S. (eds.) Modern Theories of Money, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Mass.: E. Elgar, pp. 411–75.Google Scholar
Bortis, H. (2012) Toward a Synthesis in Post-Keynesian Economics in Luigi Pasinetti's Contribution’, in Arena, R. and Porta, P. L. (eds.) Structural Dynamics and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145–80.Google Scholar
Bortis, H. (2013) ‘Post-Keynesian Principles and Economic Policies’, in Harcourt, G. C. and Kriesler, P. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics, vol. II, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 326–65.Google Scholar
Dembinski, P. H. (2008) Finance: Servant or Deceiver? Financialization at the Crossroads, London: Palgrave-Macmillan; original: Finance Servante ou Finance Trompeuse? Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, Editions Paroles et Silence.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. ([1930] 1971) A Treatise on Money, 2 vols., London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. ([1933] 1973) A Monetary Theory of Production, reprinted in Collected Works, vol. XIII, The General Theory and After, Part I: Preparation, London: Macmillan, pp. 408–11.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. ([1936] 1973) The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1980) Activities 1940–44–Shaping the Post-War World: The Clearing Union, Collected Writings, vol. XXV, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marx, K. ([1885] 1973) Das Kapital, vol. II, Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1967) Rendita e distribuzione in un modello economico plurisettoriale, Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Quesnay, F. (1972) Quesnay's Tableau économique, edited, with new material, translations and notes by Kuczynski, M. and Meek, R. L., London: Macmillan; New York: A. M. Kelley for the Royal Economic Society and the American Economic Association (1st edn 1758).Google Scholar
Shackle, G. L. S. (1967) The Years of High Theory: Invention and Tradition in Economic Thought 1926-1939, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, R. (1992) John Maynard Keynes, vol. II, The Economist as Saviour 1920–1937, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1960) Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arena, Richard, and Salvadori, Neri (eds.) Money, Credit and the Role of the State: Essays in Honour of Augusto Graziani, London: Ashgate Publishing.
Arnold, V. I. (2006) From Hilbert's Superposition Problem to Dynamical Systems’, in Bolibruch, A. A., Osipov, Yu. S. and Sinai, Ya. G. (eds.) Mathematical Events of the Twentieth Century, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Moscow: PHASIS, ch.2, pp. 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellman, R., and Cooke, K. L. (1963) Differential-Difference Equations, London: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Birkhoff, G. D. (1927) Dynamical Systems, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brouwer, L. E. J. (1981) Brouwer's Cambridge Lectures on Intuitionism, ed. by van Dalen, Dirk, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. D. (1958) Computability and Unsolvability, London: Constable and Company, Ltd.Google Scholar
Davis, M. D., Sigal, R., and Weyuker, E. J. (1994) Computability, Complexity, and Languages: Fundamentals of Theoretical Computer Science, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goodstein, R. L. (1944) ‘On the Restricted Ordinal Theorem’, Journal of Symbolic Logic, 9.2, pp. 3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, R. M. (1951a) ‘Iteration, Automatic Computers and Economic Dynamics’, Metroeconomica, 3.1, pp. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, R. M. (1951b) ‘The Nonlinear Accelerator and the Persistence of Business Cycles’, Econometrica, 19.1, pp. 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, J. R (1950) A Contribution to the Theory of the Trade Cycle, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hilbert, D. (1902) ‘Mathematical Problems’, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 8 July, pp. 437–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1940) A Model of the Trade Cycle’, The Economic Journal, 50.2, pp. 7892.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1954) ‘The Relation of Economic Growth and Cyclical Fluctuations’, The Economic Journal, 64.253, pp. 5371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1985) Economics without Equilibrium, New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Kalecki, M. (1935) ‘A Macrodynamic Theory of Business Cycles’, Econometrica, 3.3, pp. 327–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1930), Secular Movements in Production and Prices: Their Nature and Their Bearing upon Cyclical Fluctuations, Boston, Mass. and New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Lundberg, E. (1937) Studies in the Theory of Economic Expansion, London: P. S. King & Son.Google Scholar
Paris, J., and Tavakol, R. (1993) Goodstein Algorithm as a Super-Transient Dynamical System’, Physics Letters A, 180, pp. 83–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pour-El, M. B and Richards, J. I. (1989) Computability in Analysis and Physics, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, H. Jr. (1967) Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1967) Rendita e distribuzione in un modello economico plurisettoriale, Milan: Giuffré.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1975) Accumulazione del capitale e rendita, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1980) ‘Rent, Income Distribution, and Orders of Efficiency and Rentability’, in Pasinetti, L. L. (ed.) Essays on the Theory of Joint Production, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 218–40.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (ed.) (1982) The Gold Problem: Economic Perspectives, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. and Pellizzari, F. (1996) Risorse, tecnologie, rendita, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. and Pellizzari, F. (1999) Rent, Resources, Technologies, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Fortis, M. (eds.) (2005) Research and Technological Innovation: The Challenge for a New Europe, Berlin: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A., and Fortis, M. (2008) The EU and the Economies of the Eastern European Enlargement, Berlin: Physica-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomaa, A. (1985) Computation and Automata, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. (1997) Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smullyan, R. M. (1993) Recursion Theory for Metamathematics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1960) Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, I. (1991) ‘Deciding the Undecidable’, Nature, 352, August, pp. 664–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velupillai, K. V. (1997) Review of “Growth and Economic Development” by Siro Lombardini’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21, pp. 1259–62.Google Scholar
Velupillai, K. V. (2009) ‘Uncomputability and Undecidability in Economic Theory’, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 215.4, pp. 1404–16.Google Scholar
Velupillai, K. V. (2011) ‘The Phillips Machine and the Epistemology of Analogue Computation’, Economia Politica – Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, 27, Special Issue on the Phillips Machine, pp. 3962.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1967) ‘Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: An Anatomy of Urban Crisis’, The American Economic Review, 57.3, pp. 415–26.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. K., and Stiglitz, J. E. (1977) ‘Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity’, The American Economic Review, 67.3, pp. 297308.Google Scholar
Eltis, W. A. (2000) The Classical Theory of Economic Growth, 2nd edn, London and New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabszewicz, J. J., and Thisse, J. F. (1979) ‘Price Competition, Quality and Income Disparities’, Journal of Economic Theory, 20.3, pp. 340–59.Google Scholar
Gabszewicz, J. J., and Thisse, J. F. (1980) ‘Entry (and Exit) in a Differentiated Industry’, Journal of Economic Theory, 22.2, pp. 327–38.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. M., and Landesmann, M. A. (1996) ‘Disaggregated Models of the Business Cycle’, in Landesmann, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Production and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 304–43.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., and Helpman, E. (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. O. (1974) ‘The Political Economy of the Rent Seeking Society’, The American Economic Review, 64.3, pp. 291303.Google Scholar
Landesmann, M. A., and Stehrer, R. (2006) ‘Goodwin's Structural Economic Dynamics: Modelling Schumpeterian and Keynesian Insights’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 17.4, pp. 501–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landesmann, M. A., and Stehrer, R. (2007) ‘Income Distribution, Technical Change and the Dynamics of International Economic Integration’, Metroeconomica, 58.1, pp. 4573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1960) ‘A Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System’, The Review of Economic Studies, 27.2, pp. 270–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1981) Structural Change and Economic Growth: A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1993) Structural Economic Dynamics: A Theory of the Economic Consequences of Human Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1986) ‘Technological Scarcity: An Essay on Production and Structural Change’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Foundations of Economics. Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford and New York: B. Blackwell, pp. 311–38.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1990) ‘Rent, Distribution and Economic Structure: A Collection of Essays’, Quaderni IDSE, 1, Milan, CNR.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. ([1817] 1951) On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. ([1912] 1961) The Theory of Economic Development: an Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle, translated from the German by Opie, R. (1961) New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2000) Pascalian Meditations, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M., and Tullock, G. (1962) The Calculus of Consent, Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Candela, G. (1975) Il modello economico di François Quesnay’, Giornale degli Economisti ed Annali di Economia, 34 N. S., pp. 6994.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2012) The Political Economy of Circular Interdependencies and Vertical Integration: Opening the Black Box of ‘National Interest’, Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2013) Structural Political Economy and the Economics of Institutions, Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I. (2014) ‘Beyond Constraining and Enabling: On How Social Structure Orients Action in Organisations,’ unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
Cardinale, I. (2015) ‘Towards a Structural Political Economy of the Eurozone’, in Cardinale, I., Coffman, D. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) The Political Economy of the Eurozone, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I., and Scazzieri, R. (2013) Technology and Production: The Economic Analysis of Tasks, Functions, and Material Structures, Working Paper, University of Cambridge.
Cardinale, I., and Coffman, D. (2014) ‘Economic Interdependencies and Political Conflict: Towards a Structural and Historical Approach to Taxation’, Economia Politica. Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, 31:3 pp. 277–300.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I., and Landesmann, M. A. (2015) ‘Tradables, Non-Tradables and the Political Economy of the Eurozone’, in Cardinale, I., Coffman, D. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) The Political Economy of the Eurozone, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I., and Runde, J. (2014) Technology and Human Practices: Beyond Enabling and Constraining, Working Paper, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cardinale, I., and Scazzieri, R. (2014) ‘The Political Economy of the Eurozone: Crisis and Prospects’, Rendiconti dell'Accademia delle Scienze dell'Istituto di Bologna, Classe di Scienze Morali, pp. 207–16.
Coffman, D. (2013) Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G. (1982) ‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories. A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change’, Research Policy, 11, pp. 147–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., and Nelson, R. R. (2010) ‘Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes’, in Halland, B. H. and Rosenberg, N. (eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. I, Burlington, Mass.: Academic Press, pp. 51128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, M. (1996) National Interests in International Society, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1969) ‘Process in Farming versus Process in Manufacturing: A Problem of Balanced Development’, in Papi, G. U. and Nunn, C. (eds.) Economic Problems of Agriculture in Industrial Societies, New York: St Martin's Press, pp. 497528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grätzel, M. (2013) ‘Energy Beyond Oil’, Paper Presented at the Second Edition of Interlab, University of Lugano, Switzerland, 18 October 2013.
Hicks, J. (1973) Capital and Time: A Neo-Austrian Theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hishiyama, I. (1960) The Tableau Economique of Quesnay’, Kyoto University Economic Review, 30.1, pp. 146.Google Scholar
Janeway, W. H. (2012) Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy: Markets, Speculation and the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jevons, W. S. (1865) The Coal Question: An Inquiry Concerning the Progress of the Nation, and the Probable Exhaustion of Our Coal-Mines, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. (1941) The Structure of American Economy, 1919–1929; an Empirical Application of Equilibrium Analysis, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. (1991) ‘The Economy as a Circular Flow’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2.1, pp. 181212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
List, F. (1885) The National System of Political Economy. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Lowe, A. (1976) The Path of Economic Growth. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, H. J. (1954) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. (1945) ‘A Model of General Economic Equilibrium’, The Review of Economic Studies, 13.1, pp. 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1973) ‘The Notion of Vertical Integration in Economic Analysis’, Metroeconomica, 25.1, pp. 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (1977) Lectures on the Theory of Production. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasinetti, L. L. (2002) ‘Il Tableau Économique e le economie moderne’, Paper Presented at Fondazione Mattioli, Milan, 9 October 2002.
Phillips, A. (1955) ‘The Tableau Économique as a Simple Leontief Model’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69.1, pp. 137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pich, M. T., Loch, C. H., and de Meyer, A. (2002) ‘On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management’, Management Science, 48.8, pp. 1008–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1967) Rendita e distribuzione in un modello economico plurisettoriale. Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1975) Accumulazione del capitale e rendita. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1980) ‘Rent, Income Distribution and Orders of Efficiency and Rentability’, in Pasinetti, L. L. (ed.), Essays on the Theory of Joint Production, London: Macmillan, pp. 219–40.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1986) ‘Technological Scarcity: An Essay on Production and Structural Change’, in Baranzini, M. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Foundations of Economics: Structures of Inquiry and Economic Theory, Oxford and New York: B. Blackwell, pp. 311–38.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1987) ‘Land Rent’, in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds.) The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics, London: Macmillan, pp. 118–21.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1990) ‘Rent, Distribution and Economic Structure: A Collection of Essays’, Quaderni IDSE, 1, Milan: CNR.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. (1996) ‘Production and Efficiency with Global Technologies’, in Landesmann, M. A. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Production and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–39.Google Scholar
Quadrio Curzio, A. and Pellizzari, F. (1999) Rent, Resources, Technologies. Berlin and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quesnay, F. ([1759] 1972) Quesnay's Tableau Économique, Kuczynski, Marguerite and Meek, Ronald L (eds.), London: Macmillian; New York: A.M. Kelley, for the Royal Economic Society and the American Economic Association.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. ([1817] 1951) On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, vol. I of The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, Sraffa, P. ed. with the collaboration of Dobb, M. H., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rogowski, R. (1987) ‘Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade’, The American Political Science Review, 81.4, pp. 1121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. (1991) ‘Leontief's “The Economy as a Circular Flow”: An Introduction’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2.1, pp. 177–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (1993) A Theory of Production: Tasks, Processes, and Technical Practices, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2009) ‘Traverse Analysis and Methods of Economic Dynamics’, in Hagemann, H. and Scazzieri, R. (eds.) Capital, Time and Transitional Dynamics, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 96132.Google Scholar
Scazzieri, R. (2014) ‘A Structural Theory of Increasing Returns’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics: 29.2, pp. 7588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, J. T. (1961) Lectures on the Mathematical Method in Analytical Economics, New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Smith, A. ([1776] 1976) An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. (1960) Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities; Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Svallfors, S. (2007) The Political Sociology of the Welfare State: Institutions, Social Cleavages, and Orientations, Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, D. B. (1962) The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Vaggi, G. (1987) The Economics of François Quesnay, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaggi, G. (2008) ‘Quesnay, François (1694–1774)’, in Durlauf, S. N. and Blume, L. E. (eds.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Basingstoke: Nature Publishing Group, pp. 816–26.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. (1962) ‘The Supply of Raw Materials in the Industrial Revolution’, Economic History Review, 15.1, pp. 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, E. (2010) Energy and the English Industrial Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×