Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-ckh7h Total loading time: 0.403 Render date: 2022-07-04T04:08:45.024Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

13 - Response strategy assessment: a tool for evaluating resilience for the management of social–ecological systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2012

Tobias Plieninger
Affiliation:
Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities
Claudia Bieling
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In this chapter our intent is to present a method – response strategy assessment – for evaluating the resilience of social–ecological systems. We will describe how key features of social–ecological resilience can be used as a basis for a simple and generic analytical tool. This method uses empirical observations of stakeholder actions, qualitative or quantitative, as input data.

We begin with a review of recent thinking concerning resilience-orientated approaches to landscape management, making important distinctions among three responses to disturbance: coping, adapting and strategic transformation. We define and classify ecosystem services as they apply to landscapes, paying particular attention to how the ecological scales (where services are generated) may or may not coincide in space or time with the social scales where stakeholders receive benefits.

We combine all of these notions in the application of response strategy assessment in a cultural landscape in southern Sweden. We conclude that the method is a simple application of resilience concepts, with potential for use in a variety of cultural landscapes and management situations.

Resilience-orientated approaches to landscape management

Resilience-orientated approaches to landscape management are concerned with how systems respond to disturbance. A disturbance may come in different forms, such as stress driven by slow-changing variables or as shocks related to fast-changing variables.

Resilience is simultaneously dependent on the nature of the drivers that exert stress or shock and on the nature of the system under influence of this disturbance. A system with few properties that support resilience may be very persistent in a stable environment with few and mild disturbances. Likewise, a system with properties that contribute to robustness, sturdiness, etc. would not be resilient in an overly hostile environment. One needs to explore both the properties of disturbances as well as those of the system to estimate the resilience of a particular system.

Type
Chapter
Information
Resilience and the Cultural Landscape
Understanding and Managing Change in Human-Shaped Environments
, pp. 224 - 241
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armitage, D.Marschke, M.Plummer, R. 2008 Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learningGlobal Environmental Change 18 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthel, S.Folke, C.Colding, J. 2010 Social–ecological memory in urban gardens retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem servicesGlobal Environmental Change 20 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. 2007 Community-based conservation in a globalized worldProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 15 188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S.Walker, B.Anderies, J. M. 2001 From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?Ecosystems 4 765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe 2000 The European Landscape ConventionStrasbourgCouncil of EuropeGoogle Scholar
Crossman, N. D.Bryan, B. A. 2009 Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionalityEcological Economics 68 654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, R. 2002 A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and servicesEcological Economics 41 393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Groot, R.Alkemade, R.Braat, L.Hein, L. 2010 Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision makingEcological Complexity 7 260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. D.Monteith, D. T.Cooper, D. M. 2005 Long-term increases in surface water dissolved organic carbon: observations, possible causes and environmental impactsEnvironmental Pollution 137 55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabricius, C.Folke, C.Cundill, G.Schultz, L. 2007 Powerless spectators, coping actors, and adaptive co-managers: a synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem managementEcology and Society 12 29http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art29/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, J. F.Burton, I.Smith, J. B.Tol, R. S. J. 1998 Handbook on Methods for Climate Change Impact Assessment and Adaptation StrategiesNairobi and AmsterdamUNEP and Institute for Environmental Studies (IVMGoogle Scholar
Fisher, B.Turner, R. K.Morling, P. 2009 Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision makingEcological Economics 68 643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, C. 2006 Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analysesGlobal Environmental Change 16 253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S.Meffe, G. K. 1996 Command and control and the pathology of natural resource managementConservation Biology 10 328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, B. 2002 Asking questions: techniques for semistructured interviewsPolitical Science and Politics 35 665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis ReportWashington, DCIsland PressGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M.Possingham, H. 2007 Active adaptive management for conservationConservation Biology 21 956CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monteith, D. T.Stoddard, J. L.Evans, C. D. 2007 Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistryNature 450 537CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naeem, S. 1998 Species redundancy and ecosystem reliabilityConservation Biology 12 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2009 A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systemsScience 325 419CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oxford Dictionaries 2011 Oxford Dictionaries OnlineOxford, UKOxford University Presshttp://oxforddictionaries.com/words/aboutGoogle Scholar
Parry, M. L.Canziani, O. F.Palutikof, J. P.van der Linden, P. J.Hanson, C. E. 2007 Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and VulnerabilityCambridge, UKCambridge University Press
Risbey, J.Kandlikar, M.Dowlatabadi, H. 1999 Scale, context, and decision making in agricultural adaptation to climate variability and changeMitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 4 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, L.Folke, C.Olsson, P. 2007 Enhancing ecosystem management through social–ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, SwedenEnvironmental Conservation 34 140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sendzimir, J.Flachner, Z. 2007 Exploiting ecological disturbanceFarming with Nature: The Science and Practice of EcoagricultureScherr, S. J.McNeely, J. A.Washington, DCIsland Press211Google Scholar
Smit, B.Pilifosova, O. 2003 From adaptation to adaptive capacity and vulnerability reductionClimate Change, Adaptive Capacity and DevelopmentSmith, J. B.Klein, R. J. T.Huq, S.LondonImperial College Press9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, B.Wandel, J. 2006 Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerabilityGlobal Environmental Change 16 282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuvendal, M.Elmqvist, T. 2011 Ecosystem services linking social and ecological systems – river brownification and the response of down stream stakeholdersEcology and Society 16 21http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss4/art21/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B. H.Holling, C. S.Carpenter, S. R.Kinzig, A. P. 2004 Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systemsEcology and Society 9 5http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrall, F.Burt, T. P. 2009 Changes in DOC treatability: indications of compositional changes in DOC trendsJournal of Hydrology 366 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×